27th February 2023

1
Overview models, and future evolution of 5G
network co-construction and sharing the
This paper is a collaborative work
technologies and solutions which have
between China Telecom, China Unicom,
been proven effective by the Chinese
Datang Mobile, Ericsson, Huawei and
operators.
ZTE based on experience in China of 5G
Network Co-Construction and Sharing
conducted in GSMA Foundry. Project Team
Since the initiation of 5G network co-
Since 2019, China Telecom and China construction and sharing, the project
Unicom have been working on 5G network team has been working on the
co-construction and sharing, with major development of related standards,
breakthroughs made in technology technical researches, and business
development, networking, operations, and deployment. Our sincere gratitude goes
management. Together, they have built to the team members from the following
the world's first, largest, and fastest 5G organizations for their contributions to
Standalone (SA) shared network, realising this guide:
one physical network correlated with two
logical networks, and multiple customised ⚫ China Telecom
private networks. This whitepaper ⚫ China Unicom
describes the technology development, ⚫ Datang Mobile
operations, management, business ⚫ Ericsson
⚫ Huawei
⚫ ZTE

2
Contents

Preface ............................................................................................................................. 4

Current Status of Global 5G Development ................................................................... 5

Challenge ………………………………………………………………………………….5
Significance of 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing ..................................... 6
Best Practice .......................................................................................................... 7

Key Technologies of 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing ............................... 9

Evolution of Standards for Mobile Communication Network Co-Construction and
Sharing ................................................................................................................... 9
5G Network Sharing ............................................................................................. 11
RAN Sharing ........................................................................................................ 11
National Inter-CN Roaming .................................................................................. 18
Spectrum Sharing ................................................................................................. 19
Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS) ....................................................................... 19
Power Sharing ...................................................................................................... 21
Inter-Carrier Dynamic Power Sharing ................................................................... 21
Promoting Standards and Industrialisation ........................................................... 23

International Roaming in 5GSA Network Co-Construction and Sharing Scenarios 24

International Roaming Under National Inter-CN Roaming .................................... 24
Scenario Description ............................................................................................ 24
New requirements in 3GPP and GSMA................................................................ 25
International Roaming Under RAN Sharing .......................................................... 26

Prospects for 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing ......................................... 27

Deepening Cooperation on 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing ................ 27
Future Technology Evolution for Network Co-Construction and Sharing.............. 28
Millimeter Wave .................................................................................................... 28
Edge Computing ................................................................................................... 29
6G Technologies .................................................................................................. 29

Glossary......................................................................................................................... 31

3
Preface

The advent of 5G is a major breakthrough in new-generation information and

communication technologies which will enable digital transformation and accelerate
future digital economic growth. Thanks to the potentially huge commercial value of 5G,
acceleration of 5G network deployments has become the primary focus of global
operators.

However, the industry is faced with challenges in 5G network deployment. One

challenge is how to reduce network construction and operation costs, and how to
benefit the billions of people in regions without advanced 5G communications
infrastructure.

To avoid repeated network construction by different individual operators, the 5G

network co-construction and sharing solution described in this paper (hereafter termed
“The CT/CU Deployment”) can reduce costs and energy consumption, effectively
improve the spectrum utilisation, and enable broader deployment of advanced mobile
networks. The CT/CU Deployment provides means to greatly reduce carbon
emissions, and accelerates the development of both digital information infrastructure
and the digital economy. The cooperation between operators will bring 5G services to
more people in less time and at reduced cost.

Since 2019, China Telecom and China Unicom have been working innovatively and
cooperating on their solution, and have made major breakthroughs in 5G network
sharing. So far, the operators have tackled many challenges in their network sharing
journey, including doubling bandwidth, multi-frequency coexistence, network
combination, and 4G/5G coordination, while ensuring good user experience over the
network. In addition, they have built the world's first and largest 5G SA shared
network, realising one physical network, two logical networks, and multiple customised
private networks, and laying a solid foundation for large-scale industrial applications.

This whitepaper describes the technologies, operation and management and

business models used in the CT/CU Deployment as well as its future evolution. In this
4
 whitepaper, as global leaders in 5G network sharing, China Telecom and China
Unicom share their use of technologies, further insights and solutions regarding
network sharing with the industry at large. The 5G Network Co-Construction and
Sharing Guide is released by the GSMA as a whitepaper to the industry to facilitate
future industry initiatives in network sharing.

1. Current Status of Global 5G Development

1.1 Challenge
Over the past few decades, the mobile communications industry has witnessed the
evolution from 1G to 5G. A new mobile network generation emerges typically every ten
years, bringing about breakthroughs in mobile technology and communications. Every
intergenerational leap or technological progress has greatly promoted industrial
upgrade as well as economic and social development, and therefore dramatically
changed the way we live and work. From analogue to digital communications, and from
voice to data services, the network throughput has increased hundreds of times, and
mobile communication networks have created a prosperous Internet economy.
As a new-generation mobile communications network, 5G networks not only
provide the ultimate user experience in Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR),
and Ultra high Definition (UHD) videos, but also enable communication between people
and things, and between things themselves, as well as meeting the application needs of
vertical industries such as mobile medicine, internet of vehicles, smart homes, industrial
control, and environmental monitoring. To rapidly integrate 5G networks into all walks of
life, 5G infrastructure construction is the key to the digital, network-based, and
intelligent transformation of the economy and society.
So far, 5.3 billion people around the world use mobile services, accounting for 67%
of the world's population. The proportion of 5G connections is expected to increase
from 8% in 2021 to 25% by 2025. However, there is still no 5G network coverage in
underdeveloped regions and countries. How to enable billions of people in such areas
to enjoy mobile communication services, experience the benefits brought by 5G and
drive global economic and social development through 5G connectivity are still to be
fully addressed by the global communications industry.

5
1.2 Significance of 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing
5G network co-construction and sharing is an effective solution to solve this
challenge, not only by reducing repeated network investment, but also accelerating
the construction of 5G networks and popularising 5G services and capabilities across
developed and underdeveloped global geographies. Network co-construction and
sharing provides four primary benefits, including; the reduction of CAPEX, integration
of operator resources for maximum efficiency, improvement in the quality of 5G
services from the user perspective, and reductions of the carbon emissions of base
stations.
1. Reduction of CAPEX
The higher network performance of 5G requires higher network infrastructure
investment. Therefore, it is difficult for a single operator to achieve large-scale 5G
network deployment in a short period of time. Thanks to the CT/CU Deployment, the
two operators can coordinate their existing network resources, therefore providing
better network performance through pace and scale of deployment, achieving a
synergistic effect.
2. Integration of operators' resources for maximum efficiency
The 5G spectrum at 3.5 GHz and 2.1 GHz of China Telecom and China Unicom
are adjacent, so only one set of equipment is required to provide better network
performance. Moreover, the network resources of the two operators are highly
complementary in a number of ways, including spectrum and ownership of physical
assets, in the southern and northern regions of China. Through the win-win cooperation
on the construction and sharing of one 5G Radio Access Network (RAN) nationwide,
the two operators achieved full 5G network coverage across the country, developed 5G
service capabilities, enhanced the market competitiveness of 5G networks, and
improved network and operational efficiency of assets.
3. Improvement in the quality of 5G services from the user perspective
With continuous development of the digital economy, 5G now carries expectations
of both consumers and industries, but the process from nationwide coverage to the
application and popularity of 5G networks is gradual. Network co-construction and
sharing shortens the waiting time for 5G service provisioning, whilst seeing a significant
reduction in infrastructure construction expenditure. With the greater benefits of 5G
services, the industry should make every effort to shift from 4G to 5G networks and
promote the development of 5G networks, and to provide users with stable and high-
quality 5G services.
6
4. Reduction of the carbon emissions of base stations
Co-construction and sharing can dramatically decrease the number of nodes
deployed in a network, improve the utilisation rate of nodes, and provide more services
with increased social and economic benefits without increasing energy consumption,
thereby effectively reducing network power consumption and promoting green and
innovative development.

1.3 Best Practice: 5G Network Co-Construction

and Sharing between China Telecom and China
Unicom
China Telecom and China Unicom, signed the 5G Network Co-Construction and
Sharing Framework Agreement in September 2019 for the construction of a nationwide 5G
RAN by sharing 5G frequency resources while building 5G core networks independently.
The two parties clearly defined their respective construction areas and the responsibilities
in construction, investment, maintenance, and costs. In the subsequent implementation of
5G co-construction and sharing, China Telecom and China Unicom continued to innovate
in technical solutions, cooperation models, and management mechanisms. On September
30, 2020, China Telecom and China Unicom completed the phase-1 construction and
commercial deployment of the world's first and largest 5G shared network, promoting 5G
network construction and end-to-end SA network evolution.

By December 2022, China Telecom and China Unicom had deployed about
1,000,000 base stations, accounting for more than 40% of all 5G base stations around the
world, and built the world's first and largest 5G SA shared network, realising large-scale
industrial applications. In addition, the sharing of 4G RANs between the two operators was
promoted, saving over USD 40 billion in network construction, and reducing network
operations costs by USD 4 billion, electricity usage by more than 10 billion kWh, and
carbon emissions by 10 million tons per year.

China Telecom and China Unicom have proposed 12 contributions to

international standards for 5G network co-construction and sharing, established the first
national standard for RAN sharing technologies in China, and led development and
implementation of global mobile communication network sharing. China Telecom and
China Unicom, together with their partners, have won various awards for the huge

7
achievements of this work, including; the iF Design Award in 2020 and 2021, the TM
Forum Outstanding Catalyst – Impact Society and Sustainability Award, the GTI
Innovative Breakthrough in Mobile Technology Award, and the GSMA GLOMO and
AMO awards.

Over the past three decades, an ICT globalisation system based on the unification
of standards, globalisation of technologies, products, supplies, and free flow of data has
been taking shape. The 5G network co-construction and sharing advocated by China
coincides with the vision of the Internet of Everything pursued by the
telecommunications industry. The CT/CU Deployment will further promote the
unification of industry standards, globalisation of supply chains, digitisation of society,
free flow of data, and circulation of capital within the industry.

China Telecom and China Unicom are global pioneers in nationwide full-lifecycle
5G network co-construction and sharing. Through a series of innovative practices in
products, technologies, operations & maintenance , and management, China Telecom
and China Unicom have accelerated the implementation of 5G network co-construction
and sharing, providing a "Chinese Experience" for the global telecommunications
industry in the following aspects:

Technology: practice of non-standalone (NSA) and SA network solutions,

Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS), power sharing, key technologies for co-construction
and sharing management, private network sharing, and international roaming solutions.

Evolution: exploration in deepening 5G network co-construction and sharing in the

future in terms of technical routes, geographic scope, number of partners, working
frequency bands, and Radio Access Technologies (RATs). Facing the further
challenges of millimeter wave spectrum sharing, indoor distribution sharing, edge
computing sharing, and 6G sharing in the future, the two operators will continue to
explore and innovate.

8
2. Key Technologies of 5G Network Co-
Construction and Sharing
2.1 Evolution of Standards for Mobile Communication Network Co-Construction
and Sharing
Since 2000 when the 3G era started, some operators in Europe have been
pressing for mobile communication network sharing, and the network sharing of
operators around the world has been emerging continuously in various forms.
Thanks to network sharing, repeated network infrastructure construction is reduced
and mobile communication services are quickly provided, benefiting users all over
the world.

From 2003 to 2004, 3GPP issued 3G network sharing standards in Release 6.

3GPP TS 23.251 defined the Multi-Operator Core Network (MOCN), including
system information broadcasting, network selection and other basic functions, as
well as the network sharing requirements for User Equipments (UEs), base
stations, and Core Networks (CNs). 3GPP TS 25.331 and other specifications have
defined the related interface protocols and other requirements for network sharing.
In Releases 8 and 10, 3GPP has respectively provided 4G and 2G network sharing
specifications.

Release 15 and later releases of 3GPP support RAN sharing and 5G MOCN,
and standardised RAN sharing in terms of network architectures, air interfaces, NG
interfaces, and Xn interfaces. TS 38.331 and other specifications have defined
more interface protocols and requirements for further network sharing. 3GPP's
requirements for network sharing continue to evolve in later releases. In Release
17, new operator- specific management of shared resources was added to adapt to
multi–cell ID scenarios. In Release 18, further research was carried out on the co-
construction and sharing management architecture, and the requirements for better
O&M management were clarified.

The Network Sharing Timeline in 3GPP is shown in Figure 2.1.

9
 Figure 2.1 Network Sharing Timeline in 3GPP

Mobile communication network sharing refers to the sharing of infrastructure or

communication equipment among multiple operators. The infrastructure includes
towers, buildings, and equipment rooms used for deploying base stations, whilst the
communication equipment includes RAN, transport network, and CN equipment.

In terms of operations management, there are two models of co-construction

and sharing for operators. One is to independently build networks and share
network resources based on business agreements, and the other is to set up a joint
venture which operates independently and undertakes wireless network
construction or maintenance. Network resource sharing includes active sharing and
passive sharing. Passive sharing refers to the sharing of infrastructure such as
antenna poles (towers), and passive equipment in transport networks. Active
sharing refers to the sharing of infrastructure in RANs such as base stations,
including those used for RAN sharing and national inter-CN roaming.

In most cases, operators obtain their frequency band resources from a

regulatory authority and invest them as shared resources in a shared network. As
the proportion of shared resources increases, CAPEX gradually decreases, but
deployment becomes more difficult to control and the coordination among operators
becomes more complex. This whitepaper focuses on active sharing which, in
comparison with the relatively mature passive sharing, requires better coordination
among operators and more complex technical solutions.

10
 Figure 2.2 Network Resource Sharing Models

Operators generally take cost reduction as the first concern when choosing
areas for network sharing. 5G network co-construction and sharing is implemented
in areas such as suburbs and rural areas, while in dense and general urban areas,
independent networks are deployed to provide differentiated services and ensure
differentiated network performance.

2.2 5G Network Sharing

5G sharing includes RAN sharing and national inter-CN roaming.

2.2.1 RAN Sharing

2.2.1.1 Technical Solutions
3GPP Standardised RAN sharing solutions support operators which intend to
share radio resources (carriers). In case of MOCN, a single (logical) RAN node
controls the (shared) radio resources. In the case of RAN sharing with multiple cell
ID broadcast radios, resources are commonly controlled by a set of
logical RAN nodes (one RAN node per cell ID broadcast). Further, the industry
adopted the term Multi-Operator RAN (MORAN) to denote a deployment variant
where the same RAN infrastructure (antennas, PAs, etc.) is used but each
operator uses its own carrier. See Figure 2.3.

11
 Figure 2.3 Network Architecture for RAN Sharing (both Operator A and B share
their RAN)
In MORAN, multiple independent carriers are configured and the PLMN IDs of
operators are broadcasted on the carriers. Baseband Units (BBUs) are shared,
and connected to Remote Radio Units (RRUs) and Active Antenna Units (AAUs)
provided by the same vendor of BBUs. Each carrier is independently configured
and managed. The RAN infrastructure provides logically and physically separated
cell resources and core network connectivity on a per operator basis. The MORAN
solution features simple RAN infrastructure sharing and O&M, and is applicable to
scenarios where operators need to maintain service and deployment
independence in shared networks.

In MOCN, one or more carriers are configured for frequency sharing.

Operators share their cells - physically and logically; in each cell, multiple Public
Land Mobile Networks (PLMNs) are broadcasted. Sharing radio resources among
participating operators is performed according to service level agreements.
Parameterisation of cell-level features needs to be negotiated among all
operators. UEs accessing shared cells select one of the broadcast PLMNs and
communicate this selection to the gNodeB, which connect UEs to their (selected)
core network, see Figure 2.4. The MOCN solution features high resource
efficiency and is applicable to operators
that closely cooperate with each other. For example, MOCN is used when
operator A has a spectrum license, and operator does not have a spectrum
license but would like to use the spectrum of operator A.

12
 RAN sharing with multiple cell ID broadcast is similar to MOCN in the sense
that each operator deploys its own 5G Core (5GC), but while MOCN requires the
operators to coordinate their allocation schemes of cell identifiers and Tracking
Area Codes, RAN sharing allows each operator to deploy respective allocation
schemes independently.

Figure 2.4 MORAN (left figure) and MOCN (right figure)

MORAN MOCN

Carriers Independent Shared

Cell-level Configured independently Configured in a unified way by

parameters by operators the hosting operator

Mobility Configured independently Configured in a unified way or

management by operators independently

Independent Quality of Independent QoS requiring

Service (QoS) operators to negotiate in
Impact on
Flexible adjustment based advance
performance
on considerable network More RAN resources available
independence for sharing

Service Implemented by multiple

Implemented independently
provisioning operators together

Two carriers deployed,

posing higher requirements
Fast implementation based on
Hardware for the bandwidth and power
existing hardware
supported by shared base
stations

13
 Network
Implemented independently Implemented in a unified way
adjustment

Table 2.1 Comparison Between MORAN and MOCN

2.2.1.2 Evolution from NSA Sharing to SA Sharing

In terms of the network sharing in the NSA phase, core networks are
independently established by operators, 5G base stations are shared, and 4G
anchor base stations are shared on demand, resulting in a complex network
architecture. As shown in Figure 2.5, the X2 interface is required between the 4G
base station and 5G base station for UE isolation and interoperation. To
implement the co-construction and sharing solution, the following two difficulties
must be tackled:

 4G and 5G base stations must be provided by the same vendor.

 4G anchor base stations and 5G base stations must be deployed at the same
site.

Figure 2.5 Evolution from 4G Sharing to NSA Sharing

There are two technical solutions for NSA sharing: dual-anchor solution
and single-anchor solution. See Figure 2.6.

14
 Figure 2.6 Dual-Anchor (left figure) and Single-Anchor (right figure) Solutions

Dual-Anchor Solution Single-Anchor Solution

⚫ 4G base stations are not ⚫ 5G base stations are

shared, and 5G base connected to the same
stations are connected to shared 4G anchor base
respective 4G anchor base station, and all the base
stations. stations must be provided by
Sharing
⚫ TX2 interfaces are the same vendor and located
required between 4G and at the same site.
5G base stations, which
must be provided by the
same vendor.

⚫ Fast network deployment ⚫ There are less requirements

leads to good user for the areas where networks
experience. are to be deployed.
Features
⚫ The requirements for the
areas where networks are
to be deployed are strict.

Table 2.2 Comparison Between Dual-Anchor and Single-Anchor Solutions

The dual-anchor solution is applicable to scenarios where the 4G base

stations of all operators as well as the 5G base stations of the hosting operator are
provided by the same vendor. Otherwise, X2 interface incompatibility problems
may occur. The dual-anchor solution can quickly achieve 5G network co-
construction and sharing with minor changes to existing 4G networks.

15
 The single-anchor solution is applicable to scenarios where 4G base stations
of operators are provided by different vendors. However, this solution requires a
complex reconstruction of existing 4G networks or the establishment of a new 4G
anchor. With this solution, 5G networks can be shared while 4G non-anchor base
stations are not.

In the NSA phase, voice services are carried over only LTE networks, i.e.
Voice over LTE (VoLTE).

The complex technical solutions for NSA sharing involve a large amount of
work in reconstruction and cause difficulties in network management and
optimisation. Therefore, an evolution to SA sharing, should be performed as soon
as possible to improve network quality.

Figure 2.7 Evolution from NSA to SA sharing

After the evolution to 5G SA sharing, operators only need to connect 5G base

stations to respective 5GCs, without the reconstruction of 5GCs. In addition,
transport networks should be scaled out as required, the base station sharing
function should be enabled for 5G base stations, and 4G base stations should be
configured as neighbour cells. With the 5G network decoupled from 4G networks,
no complex anchor coordination solution is needed, easy optimisation of the 5G

16
network is made possible, and good user experience is guaranteed in both 4G
and 5G networks.

In the SA phase, there are two voice service solutions: Voice over New Radio
(VoNR) and Evolved Packet System (EPS) fallback.

EPS fallback allows UEs to fall back either to their operators' LTE networks if
5G base stations are shared, or to the hosting operator's LTE network if both 5G
and 4G base stations are shared (if 4G base stations have been shared in the
NSA phase, they do not need to be reconstructed), see Figure 2.8.

Figure 2.8 Fallback of UEs to their Operators' LTE Networks

After fallback, voice services are provided via LTE networks to ensure voice
service continuity, while only data services are in NR networks. If a UE initiates a
voice call, a handover is triggered when the gNodeB establishes an IP Multimedia
Subsystem (IMS) voice channel in the NR network. In this case, the gNodeB
sends a redirection or inter-RAT handover request to the 5GC. After the UE falls
back to the LTE network, its voice services are implemented based on VoLTE.
EPS fallback allows 5G UEs to camp on NR networks where voice services are
not provided. Since there is latency in the fallback procedure, the call setup
duration increases.

The VoNR solution requires only 5G base stations to be shared. NR networks

are connected to the 5GC while LTE networks are connected to the Evolved
Packet Core (EPC). In NR networks, VoNR is used to provide voice services, and
17
 at the 5G network edge, UEs are handed over to their LTE networks through the
N26 interface and the voice services are continued on LTE. VoNR improves voice
quality and allows all the data and voice services of a UE to be implemented in the
same NR network.

2.2.2 National Inter-CN Roaming

2.2.2.1 Technical Solutions
The core networks involved in national inter-CN roaming are established by
respective operators. The core network of the hosting operator is interconnected
with that of the participating operator. Base stations are shared between operators
and connected to only the hosting operator's core network, see Figure 2.9. Unlike
international roaming, a national inter-CN roaming UE in the visited area may
receive signals from the Home PLMN (HPLMN), because the area is covered by
the 4G/5G signals of the hosting operator's network and the 4G signals of the
participating operator's network at the same time, resulting in a network selection
problem for the UE.

Figure 2.9 Network Architecture for National Inter-CN Roaming with

shared base stations

2.2.2.2 4G/5G Core Network Interconnection and Evolution

In the NSA phase, the EPC networks of operators are interconnected, and
NSA networks are constructed in different areas. 5G NSA UEs and 4G UEs can
use the same roaming policy or different roaming policies, depending on network
coverage, planning, and business cooperation. If operators have used national
inter-CN roaming in the 4G phase, the same roaming policy is used for 4G and
18
 NSA UEs in the NSA sharing phase. If operators have not used national inter-CN
roaming in the 4G phase and need to directly implement NSA sharing, different
roaming policies need to be used for 4G and NSA UEs to ensure that NSA UEs
roam to the coverage area of the shared NSA network and 4G UEs attached to 4G
networks. To implement such roaming policies, on base stations, Mobility
Management Entities (MMEs) and other Network Elements (NEs), operators need
to configure a mobility management policy and related information based on the
RAT Frequency Selection Priority (RFSP), mobility restriction and other
technologies to control inter-PLMN mobility.

In the SA sharing phase, a roaming UE can access a 5G Visited PLMN

(VPLMN) to use 5G services. In national inter-CN roaming mode, the RANs and
5GCs of operators are independently constructed and managed, and UEs are
separately managed. National inter-CN roaming is implemented through home
routing. That is, the data of a roaming UE is returned to the HPLMN, and the
HPLMN provides services for the UE.

The networks involved in national inter-CN roaming should provide IMS-

based voice and video services (including emergency call services), Short
Message Service (SMS) over IP (i.e. via IMS), and data services for UEs, and the
involved operators should provide services for roaming UEs based on an inter-
network roaming protocol.

2.3 Spectrum Sharing

Refarming 4G spectrum for rapid 5G network deployment has become a
global consensus, and about 50% of global 5G operators have put such refarming
into application. As 4G services and UEs will still exist, a major challenge is how to
coordinate the 4G and 5G development strategies and pace of the participating
and hosting operators in the 5G co-construction and sharing network, so as to
guarantee good user experience. Against such a backdrop, China Telecom and
China Unicom adopt the DSS technology. The DSS technology saves network
investment by taking account of the different 4G and 5G development strategies
and deployment timescales of operators.

2.3.1 Dynamic Spectrum Sharing (DSS)

Challenges

19
 In the early stage of 5G, 4G traffic is much heavier than 5G traffic, so there
exists an opportunity to optimise the use of spectrum when deploying standalone
5G networks.

Innovation
China Telecom and China Unicom have proposed the DSS technology to
promote the coordinated development of 4G and 5G based on the LTE 2.1 GHz
frequency band that features strong penetrability – see Figure 2.10. With the
DSS technology, 5G networks can be rapidly deployed without affecting 4G user
experience, effectively improving spectrum efficiency and meeting different
service requirements of both 4G and 5G users.

Figure 2.10 DSS Technology

In this solution, both 4G and 5G service requirements should be collected and

prioritised, and spectrum resources be allocated based on the priorities, so that
the 4G and 5G spectrum resources can be dynamically shared. Figure 2.11 shows
how the DSS solution works. For dynamic spectrum sharing, LTE and NR services
use the same spectrum, and the interference between them can be prevented or
reduced by using such technologies as Cell-Specific Reference Signal (CRS) rate
adaptation, Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service Single Frequency Network
(MBSFN) subframe, and Zero Power Channel State Information Reference Signal
(ZP CSI-RS). The potential increase in the overhead of 4G and 5G Physical
Downlink Control Channels (PDCCHs) after the DSS solution is used can be
minimised through efficient PDCCH allocation.

20
 Figure 2.11 DSS Solution

The spectrum resources allocated for NR and LTE can be dynamically

adjusted in accordance with the number of connected 4G and 5G UEs, thus
ensuring the optimal uplink and downlink performance. In addition, 4G and 5G
Physical Downlink Shared Channels (PDSCHs) and Physical Uplink Shared
Channels (PUSCHs) can be shared in real time and scheduled at millisecond level
based on service requirements to improve spectrum efficiency.

Technical Achievements

By taking 4G and 5G service requirements into account and coordinating the

development strategies and service requirements of operators involved in network
sharing, the DSS technology provides an intelligent adaptation policy for the long-
term network evolution. The DSS solution won the Best Mobile Technology
Breakthrough award in 2018.

2.4 Power Sharing

2.4.1 Inter-Carrier Dynamic Power Sharing
Challenges

Currently, the maximum transmit power of an AAU with Massive Multiple Input
Multiple Output (MIMO) on the 3.5 GHz frequency band is 320 W, and the transmit
power of each 100 MHz cell is 200 W. In the CT/CU Deployment , the minimum
bandwidth shall be 200 MHz on the 3.5 GHz frequency band. If a second carrier is
enabled, the average power of each carrier is only 160 W, resulting in 1 dB lower
21
power in coverage. Therefore, how to enable the second carrier without
deteriorating the coverage performance becomes an urgent issue.

Innovation

To address this issue, power resource pooling and dynamic power sharing
are introduced. As shown in Figure 2.12, the power resource pooling technology
allows dynamic power sharing between two carriers and flexible power allocation
in a unified manner. The dynamic power sharing technology actively allocates
power to two carriers based on service requirements. This ensures lossless
coverage performance when the second carrier is enabled in lightly-loaded
networks.

Figure 2.12 Dynamic Power Sharing

Technical Achievements
The application on the live network in Anhui province shows that the average
user experience in downlink services improves by 5% to 20% after the dynamic
power sharing technology is used.

22
 2.5 China Telecom and China Unicom Promoting
Standards and Industrialisation of 5G
Network Co-Construction and Sharing

2.5.1 Taking the lead in the project initiation of seven 5G international standards
and seven industry standards, significantly enhancing the influence of 5G
network co-construction and sharing on industry chains
China Telecom and China Unicom took the lead in the initiation of four 3GPP
specification projects: 2.1 GHz 40/50 MHz bandwidth Frequency Division
Duplexing (FDD) NR, NSA 26 dBm high-power UE, FDD Massive MIMO, and 5G
Quality of Experience (QoE). The 2.1 GHz 40/50 MHz bandwidth FDD NR greatly
promotes the technical evolution of FDD NR high bandwidth, and provides strong
impetus for FDD spectrum refarming and improvement in network
competitiveness. China Telecom and China Unicom launched the world's first
base station (with a RRU) that supports both the 1.8 GHz and 2.1 GHz frequency
bands and can operate at full power, and implemented the first 2.1 GHz 40/50
MHz bandwidth test in April 2020, promoting the development of high-bandwidth
FDD NR UEs.

China Telecom and China Unicom led the project initiation of the following
industry standards in the CCSA: Research on Smart Energy Saving of 5G Base
Stations, Technical Requirements for 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing,
Test Methods for 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing, Technical
Requirements for 5G Digital Indoor Distribution, and Test Methods for 5G Digital
Indoor Distribution.

2.5.2 Taking the lead in the outdoor 200 MHz bandwidth technology and achieving
the peak downlink data rate 2.7 Gbps

23
 To take advantage of spectrum sharing, improve the competitiveness of 5G
networks, and fully implement high-bandwidth capabilities, the operators enable
base stations to support 200 MHz bandwidth in conjunction with Carrier
Aggregation (CA). This enables 5G networks to meet the application requirements
whilst making full use of the high bandwidth and large capacity of the 3.5 GHz
frequency band and achieving a peak downlink data rate of 2.7 Gbps to a single
user. See figure 2.13.

Figure 2.13 Outdoor 200 MHz Bandwidth Technology

3. International Roaming in 5G SA Network

Co-Construction and Sharing Scenarios
3.1 International Roaming Under National Inter-CN Roaming
3.1.1 Scenario Description
In the 5G SA scenario, an operator can deploy a shareable network. For
example, operator 1 (OP1) shares its RAN with operator 2 (OP2), and operator 3
(OP3) is a roaming partner of OP2. In this case, the UEs of OP3 can connect to
the shared RAN of OP1 to access the services of OP2. Figure 3.1 illustrates the
network architecture for national inter-CN roaming in the 5G SA scenario.

24
 NG-RAN 5G core network 5G core network
DN
of OP2 of OP2 of OP3

UE of OP3

Shared NG-RAN 5G core network

of OP1 of OP1

Figure 3.1 Scenario of International Roaming Users in national Inter-CN Roaming

As shown in the figure, three operators (OP1, OP2, and OP3) are involved in
this scenario.

OP1 not only shares its RAN with OP2, but also makes its core network shareable
for inbound roamers of OP2.

OP2 signs a 5G network sharing agreement with OP1 for sharing the RAN of OP1.

OP3 is a roaming partner of only OP2 (that is, they have signed a roaming
agreement).

Since OP2 has signed a 5G network sharing agreement with OP1, the UEs of
OP2 can connect to the shared RAN of OP1 to access the services of OP2. In
addition, OP3's UEs roaming in OP2's dedicated RAN or OP1's shared RAN can
access the services of OP2 through the corresponding RAN.

3.1.2 New requirements in 3GPP and GSMA

In Release 18, 3GPP TS 23.501 only supports 5G MOCN, and 3GPP
specifications describe roaming covering both national and international roaming
in the 5G SA scenario. 3GPP SA1 initiated in Release 19 the Feasibility Study on
Network Sharing Aspect, documented in TR 22.851, attaching greater importance
to the feasibility of more sharing modes. Section 5 of TR 22.851 covers "Use case
on International Roaming Users in a Shared Network" and includes as potential
new requirements to support the use case.

[PR 5.4.6-001] The 5G system shall enable the shared access network of a
hosting operator with indirect connection between the shared access network and
a participating operator's core network to provide services for inbound roaming
users.
25
 In addition, GSMA PRD NG.113 (5GS Roaming Guidelines) only supports
bilateral roaming. Unlike the serving networks in bilateral roaming, a serving
network in national inter-CN roaming involves multiple operators. Therefore, how
to increase support for international roaming under national inter-CN roaming in
the 5G SA scenario requires further work in the GSMA.

3.2 International Roaming Under RAN Sharing

In RAN sharing, multiple operators share one 5G RAN, but their 5GCs are
independent. As shown in Figure 3.2, the shared 5G RAN is connected to the
5GCs built by respective operators via Next Generation (NG) interfaces.

Figure 3.2 Roaming Under RAN Sharing in the 5G SA Scenario

Roaming under RAN sharing in the 5G SA scenario includes Home-Routed

(HR) roaming and Local Breakout (LBO) roaming. The international roaming
procedure in the 5G SA scenario after a UE accesses the corresponding PLMN is
the same as the standard international roaming procedure. 3GPP has defined the
interfaces related to international roaming in the 5G SA scenario. For details, refer
to GSMA PRD NG.113, 3GPP TS 23.501, and 3GPP TS 23.502.

26
4. Prospects for 5G Network Co-Construction
and Sharing
4.1 Deepening Cooperation on 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing
Figure 4.1 illustrates the evolution of 5G network co-construction and sharing
from the perspective of technical routes, geographic scope, number of partners,
operating frequency band, and RAT.

geographical
technical routes scope

National

Townships, rural areas

Remote areas
5G
5G+4G
2
More standards
3

4
technical partner size
standards
operating bands

Figure 4.1 Evolution of 5G Network Co-Construction and Sharing

1) Technical routes: Focusing on RAN sharing, operators should also

determine other technologies such as national inter-CN roaming for 5G
network co-construction and sharing.
2) Geographic scope: Operators should consider the geographic scope for
5G network co-construction and sharing, including indoor scenarios.
3) Number of partners: Operators can also extend 5G network co-
construction and sharing to more than two partners.
4) Operating frequency band: 5G systems can operate on multiple frequency
bands, such as 3.5 GHz, 2.6 GHz z, 2.1 GHz, 700 MHz, and 800 MHz.
With the deepening of 5G network co-construction and sharing, more
frequency bands such as millimeter wave will be used.

27
 5) RAT: As 5G network co-construction and sharing advances, 4G RATs,
including 4G Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT) and Enhanced
Machine Type Communication (eMTC), may also be involved.

The above aspects should be comprehensively taken into account for further
development of 5G network co-construction and sharing. For example, to provide
more options for such scenarios as indoor infrastructure sharing, vendors should
continue to develop new devices in terms of device forms and deployment modes.
In addition, they need to choose the most optimum operating frequency band to
meet different geographic requirements. For instance, in remote areas, sub-1GHz
bands should be used for 5G network co-construction and sharing.

4.2 Future Technology Evolution for Network

Co-Construction and Sharing
4.2.1 Millimeter Wave
Featuring high bandwidth and low latency, millimeter Wave (mmWave) is
crucial for both current and future 5G network development. The mmWave
frequency bands will coexist with other frequency bands in the long term, as 5G
networks need both high and low frequency bands. ER-UTRA NR Dual
Connectivity (EN-DC), NR Dual Connectivity (NR-DC) and Frequency Range 1
(FR1) + Frequency Range 2 (FR2) Carrier Aggregation (CA) enable optimal
utilisation of high and low frequency bands in different stages of 5G development,
making mmWave play a full part in 5G network co-construction and sharing
scenarios.

With the global popularity of 5G, mmWave frequency bands can be used as a
supplement to the main frequency bands (medium and low frequency bands) of
5G networks. When using high-traffic services, a terminal can use mmWave to
offload traffic. NR-DC/CA can be adopted to implement better inter-frequency
coordination for the devices from the same vendor, and only the frequencies in
FR2 are used for the devices of different vendors in 5G network co-construction
and sharing. The priority-based carrier scheduling and load balancing help to
maximise the utilisation of medium and low frequency bands.

28
4.2.2 Edge Computing
To achieve ultra-large-scale computing and short latency, cloud servers and
edge servers should be deployed close to users to run applications with stringent
requirements on computing and latency in 5G networks, thus ensuring the good
operation of industrial applications through cloud-pipe-terminal coordination.

The Edge Computing (EC) technology introduced in 5G networks supports a

variety of industrial applications that impose high requirements on network latency
and data security. In a shared network, the hosting operator and participating
operators can share the computing power of the edge servers, which coordinate
with the cloud servers and terminals to flexibly schedule and transfer computing
resources. In this way, the QoS of edge computing applications as well as the
coverage of edge computing is improved, thus attracting more third-party
applications and ultimately providing better user experience.

4.2.3 6G Technologies
With the acceleration of 5G network construction, a variety of applications are
flourishing in vertical industries. As a new generation of mobile communication
systems emerge about every ten years, it is predicted that 6G will be commercially
available around 2030.

At present, many countries have issued whitepapers on 6G visions. The

expectations for next-generation networks, especially those for key technologies,
are all incorporated into the 6G visions.

The 6G visions include instantaneous speed, ubiquitous 3D connectivity,

integrated sensing & communication, intrinsic intelligence, smart simplicity,
security & trust, sustainability & sharing, and flexibility & openness.

To realise these visions, various network virtualisation technologies have

been proposed, such as mmWave and terahertz, satellite-integrated space-air-
ground-sea connectivity, high-frequency multi-sensory data fusion, intelligent
semantic communication, cloud-network convergence and computing power
networks, instinct security, and intelligent energy saving.

6G network co-construction and sharing is still in the research stage. With the
development of key 6G technologies, the following three aspects are expected to
become the focus in the next few years:

29
 Smart simplicity: In the face of massive service access and dynamic
network requirements in the future, network design should be oriented towards
simplicity and decentralisation, unifying basic interface protocols and access
management
modes. In co-construction and sharing, multiple operators can share network
resources, thus providing seamless network access.

Network compatibility: The 6G network should be compatible with

traditional networks. In co-construction and sharing, smooth voice and data
services can be guaranteed during inter-PLMN or inter-RAT handover.

So far, many countries have started to promote research on 6G

technologies, which will definitely drive the mobile communication industry to
new heights. Unified international communication standards are essential for
the success of 6G. Therefore, China Telecom and China Unicom will
unswervingly participate in the formulation and update of the standards,
promoting 6G globalisation and the development of the community with a
shared future for mankind.

30
Glossary

1G – 1st Generation (of Mobile Technology)

2G – 2nd Generation (of Mobile Technology)
3G – 3rd Generation (of Mobile Technology)
4G – 4th Generation (of Mobile Technology)
5G – 5th Generation (of Mobile Technology)
5GC – 5G Core (Network)
6G – 6th Generation (of Mobile Technology)
AAU – Active Antenna Unit
AI – Artificial Intelligence
AR – Augmented Reality
BBU -Baseband Unit
CA – Carrier Aggregation
CAPEX – Capital Expenditure
CCSA – China Communications Standards Association
CN – Core Network
CRS - Cell-Specific Reference Signal
DSS – Dynamic Spectrum Sharing
ECGI – E-UTRAN CGI
FR1 – Frequency Range 1
FR2 – Frequency Range 2
EC – Edge Computing
eMTC –Enhanced Machine Type Communication
EN-DC – E-UTRA-NR Dual Connecttivity
EPC – Evolved Packet Core
EPS – Evolved Packet System
E-UTRA – Evolved UMTS Radio Access
FDD - Frequency Division Duplexing
HPLMN – Home PLMN
ICT – Information & Communications Technology
ID – Identity
IP – Internet Protocol
IMS – IP Multimedia Subsystem
KPI – Key Performance Indicators
LBO – Local Break-Out
LTE – Long Term Evolution
MBSFN - Multimedia Broadcast multicast service Single Frequency Network
MES – Manufacturing Execution System
MIMO – Multiple Input Multiple Output
MME – Mobility Management Entity
MOCN – Multi-Operator Core Network
MORAN – Multi-Operator Radio Access Network
MU-MIMO – Multi-User MIMO
NB-IoT – Narrow Band Internet of Things
NG – Next Generation
NR – New Radio
NR-DC – NR Dual Connectivity
NSA – Non-Standalone
O&M – Operations & Maintenance
31
PDCCH - Physical Downlink Control Channel
PDSCH – Physical Downlink Shared Channel
PUSCH – Physical Uplink Shared Channel
PLMN – Public Land Mobile Network
QoE – Quality of Experience
QoS – Quality of Service
RAN – Radio Access Network
RAT – Radio Access Technology
RFSP – RAT Frequency Selection Priority
RRU – Remote Radio Unit
SA – Standalone
SMS – Short Message Service
TDD – Time Division Duplexing
TNR – TDD NR
TTI – Transmission Time Interval
UE – User Equipment
UHD – Ultra Hi-Definition
UMTS – Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
UPF – User Plane Function
USD – United States Dollar
VPLMN – Visited PLMN
VoLTE – Voice over LTE
VR – Virtual Reality
ZP CSI-RS - Zero Power Channel State Information Reference Signal

32
About this whitepaper
This is a GSMA whitepaper and is a public document subject to copyright protection.

The GSM Association makes no representation, warranty or undertaking (express or

implied) with respect to and does not accept any responsibility for, and hereby disclaims
liability for the accuracy or completeness or timeliness of the information contained in this
document. The information contained in this document may be subject to change without
prior notice.

The information contained herein is in full compliance with the GSM Association’s
antitrust
compliance policy.

Copyright © 2023 GSM Association

About GSMA
The GSMA is a global mobile industry association that represents the interests of
mobile operators worldwide, uniting more than 750 operators with almost 300
companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset and device
makers, and software companies. The GSMA also holds the industry-leading
events such as Mobile World Congress (in Barcelona, Shanghai and Los Angeles)
and the Mobile 360 Series.
GSMA Foundry is the go-to place for cross-industry collaboration and business
development, where GSMA members and industry players come together to
rapidly develop real-world solutions to industry challenges, nurture new ideas
through initial commercial trials and scale proven solutions at a regional and global
level to forge our digital future.
For more information, please visit www.gsma.com/futurenetworks .

GSMA HEAD OFFICE

1 Angel Lane
London
EC4R 3AB
UK
www.gsma.com

33