Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites PDF
Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites PDF
Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites PDF
ABSTRACT
Epoxy nanocomposite samples with a good dispersion of alumina nanoparticles in
epoxy matrix were prepared and experiments were performed to measure their partial
discharge resistant characteristics. Epoxy alumina nanocomposites with 0.1, 1, 5, 10
and 15 wt% nanofillers were prepared in the laboratory and partial discharge (PD)
experiments were conducted at a voltage of 10 kV for different durations using IEC (b)
type electrodes. The degradation of the sample surfaces were analyzed using SEM
techniques, surface profile studies, FTIR spectroscopy as well as PD studies. An
attempt was made to understand the interaction dynamics between the nanoparticle
and the epoxy chain by measuring the glass transition temperature of the
nanocomposites. The partial discharge resistance obtained for the nanocomposites are
compared with those of unfilled epoxy and epoxy microcomposites. It was observed that
even with 0.1 wt% of nanofiller added to the epoxy matrix, the partial discharge
resistance to degradation gets improved considerably. It was also observed that the
inter particle distance has a significant effect on the discharge resistance to
degradation. The improvement in the degradation resistance is attributed to the
interactions between the nanoparticle and the epoxy chain. A possible mechanism for
the surface degradation of nanocomposites has been proposed.
Index Terms — Epoxy, nanocomposites, nanofiller, partial discharge, surface
degradation.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 1; February 2011 265
in a nanocomposite during exposure to electrical discharges. It Table 1. Interparticle distance in epoxy alumina nanocomposites.
was also shown that the resistance to partial discharges and to
Filler Inter particle distance
plasmas improve with increase in the nanofiller content.
concentration (wt%) (nm)
Investigations have been carried out on the effect of
electrical, chemical and radiation induced stresses on the 0.1 447
surface chemistry of unfilled epoxy and epoxy composites by 0.5 245
Hepburn et al. [14-16] and they suggest that the filler materials
affect the physico-chemical reactions occurring due to the 1 186
electrical discharges. 5 91
Although several possible reasons for the improvements in the
10 62
surface discharge resistance have been suggested and are still
being explored, a generalized inference cannot be made as yet 15 48
and focused studies are still desired to understand the influence of 20 39
nanofiller addition and the filler concentration on the degradation
mechanism of polymers exposed to electrical discharges.
In this paper, an attempt has been made to study the partial
discharge resistant characteristics of epoxy alumina 2.3 SAMPLE PREPARATION
nanocomposites with various nanofiller loadings. The filler As the nanoparticles are highly charged particles they
concentrations are so selected that the interparticle distance tend to agglomerate and form larger particles leading to a
between them becomes almost in the same range as that of the reduction in the surface area to volume ratio. Since most of
particle diameter itself. It was found that with the increase in the the promising dielectric properties are related to the surface
filler concentration, the average surface roughness reduces and area enhancement in the nanocomposites, proper processing
this is explained based on the physical model. An attempt is also techniques are to be adapted to uniformly disperse the
made to understand the chemical degradation taking place on the nanoparticles [18].
sample surface due to the electrical discharge and its effect on the The nanocomposites were prepared by the direct
degradation resistance of the epoxy alumina nanocomposites.
dispersion technique in the laboratory. Initially the epoxy
resin and the hardener were degassed for one hour to
2 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS remove trapped air bubbles and moisture. The filler
2.1 MATERIALS USED particles were vacuum dried at 150 0C for 24 hours and are
Bisphenol-A epoxy resin (CY1300, density 1.16 g/cm3) kept at 150 oC for several days to maintain the dryness
along with a Triethylene Tetramine (TETA) hardener (HY956, before using it for processing. Then the epoxy resin and the
density 1.02 g/cm3) of Huntsman make were used for the nanofiller were mixed in a high shear mechanical mixer at a
investigations. The nanofiller material used was spherical speed of 700 rpm for 2 minutes. The mixture was then
aluminium oxide nanoparticle of average particle size (APS) subjected to ultrasonic agitation at a frequency of 24 kHz
40 nm and density 4 g/cm3 at 25 OC. Aluminium oxide particles for 1 hour. Then the hardener is added to the particle-resin
of average particle size 5 μm were used as microfillers. All the mixture in the ratio 1:4 and mixed thoroughly by hand
fillers were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich, USA. mixing. This mixture is then degassed to remove the
trapped air bubbles before casting it in a mould at 60 0C for
2.2 SPECIMENS PREPARED
4 hours to prepare samples of 3mm thickness and 75 mm
To understand the effect of filler concentration and the diameter. Proper care was taken to reduce the moisture
interface on the surface discharge degradation resistance, ingress in to the materials while processing. The epoxy
different filler concentrations were chosen based on the
micro composite sample was prepared by mechanical
interparticle distance. The inter particle distance in epoxy
mixing alone. The samples prepared are then kept in a
nanocomposites has been calculated using the expression
dessicator under vacuum for at least 24 hours to release
given by Tanaka et al [17].
residual stresses if any before carrying out the surface
ଵ
ߨ ߩ ͳͲͲ ݐݓΨ ߩ ଼ discharge studies [19].
ܦൌ ۃ൜ ൬ ൰ ͳ െ ൬ͳ െ ൰൨ൠ െ ͳ݀ ۄሺͳሻ The dispersion of fillers in the epoxy nanocomposites
ߩ ݐݓΨ ͳͲͲ ߩ
were investigated by examining the cross section of the
ȡm and ȡn are the specific gravity of the matrix and that of the sample under a JEOL field emission scanning electron
filler respectively and ‘d’ is the diameter of the filler. The microscope (FESEM). Samples of approximately 2 mm × 2
interparticle distance for epoxy alumina nanocomposites are as mm × 3 mm are prepared by cutting the epoxy
shown in Table 1. It can be seen from Table 1 that above 5 nanocomposites at different locations on the specimen.
wt% filler concentration, the interparticle distance is less than Then the samples were coated with gold of 5 nm thickness
100 nm. Also it can be seen that the inter particle distance to prevent the specimen from charging when exposed to the
reaches a value almost equal to the filler diameter itself at a electron beam in the microscope. The images in Figure 1a
filler concentration of 15 wt%. So for the present study filler and 1b show uniform dispersion of alumina nanoparticles
concentrations of 0.1,1,5,10 and 15 wt% of nano alumina were in the epoxy matrix at a filler concentration of 5 wt% and
chosen. 15 wt% respectively.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
266 P. Preetha and M. J. Thomas: Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEE
EE Transaction
ns on Dielectricss and Electrical Insulation Vool. 18, No. 1; February 2011 267
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
268 P. Preetha and M. J. Thomas: Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites
(a) Unexposed unfilled epoxy (b) Exposed unfilled epoxy (c) Exposed 0.1 wt% epoxy-alumina
nanocomposite
(d) Exposed 1 wt% epoxy alumina (e) Exposed 10 wt% epoxy alumina (f) Exposed 15 wt% epoxy alumina
nanocomposite nanocomposite nanocomposite
(g) Exposed 1 wt% epoxy alumina (h) Exposed 10 wt% epoxy alumina (i) Exposed 15 wt% epoxy alumina
microcomposite microcomposite microcomposite
Figure 6. SEM images of the discharge exposed regions of epoxy composites aged for 24 h at 10 kV.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 1; February 2011 269
Counts
H2O molecules [20]. The hydroxyl groups can be present as
free OH groups attached to the nanoparticle surface or as OH
groups attached to the absorbed water (H2O) molecules or
both. When these nanoparticles are introduced into the epoxy,
Binding energy( keV) Binding energy (keV) the chemical reaction between the nanoparticles and the epoxy
(a) Before discharge (b) After discharge if any, will introduce chemical changes in the bulk of the
nanocomposite leading to formation of new chemical bonds.
Figure 7. EDAX analysis of epoxy alumina nanocomposite (10 wt%)
But the FTIR spectrum of neat epoxy and epoxy alumina
nanocomposite does not indicate the presence of new chemical
3.3 FTIR SPECTROSCOPY MEASUREMENTS bonds. So the possible interaction between the epoxy and the
In order to understand the interactions happening at the nanoparticle is through the hydrogen bonding that can happen
interface between the nanofiller and the epoxy polymer, the between the –OH group on the fillers and the electrophilic
FTIR spectrum of alumina filler, neat epoxy and epoxy oxygen of the epoxide group [21]. The –OH group is highly
alumina nanocomposites were studied and are as shown in polar because of the large electronegativity difference between
Figure 8. oxygen and hydrogen. The oxygen atom has a partial negative
charge and the hydrogen atom has a partial positive charge.
The positively charged hydrogen on one –OH can weakly
interact with the negatively charged oxygen of a second –OH.
This interaction results in a weak chemical bond known as
hydrogen bonding. These hydrogen bonds do not indicate as a
new peak in the spectrum. So no difference is observed
between the spectrum of neat epoxy and epoxy
nanocomposites. But it has been reported by Smith [22] that
the number and strength of hydrogen bonds varies from place
to place in a collection of molecules depending upon the
chemical environment in which it is present. The number of
chemical environments in a sample contributes to the width of
the peak. Because of the large number of chemical
environments caused by hydrogen bonding, the infrared bands
are usually broad. The peak width, intensity and position of –
OH infrared bands are all affected by the extent of hydrogen
bonding in a sample. It is observed that the peak width and
(a) FTIR spectrum of alumina nanofiller intensity of –OH bands are increased with the addition of
nanofillers to epoxy and so this may be considered as an
indication of the increase of the hydrogen bonding in the
nanocomposite sample.
The FTIR spectrum of the specimens exposed to surface
discharges were taken around the periphery where the
degradation is maximum. The FTIR spectrum of the eroded
region just near to the high voltage rod electrode for neat
epoxy and epoxy nanocomposites aged for 24 h are as shown
in Figure 9. Table 3 gives the wavebands and their
assignments for unstressed and stressed epoxy/epoxy
nanocomposites. It is observed that there is a degradation of
the –OH groups and a sharp peak has formed in the region of
the –OH stretching bands in the case of unfilled epoxy. It has
also been reported by Smith [22] that, where little or no
hydrogen bonding takes place the –OH stretching band would
appear sharper, weaker and at a higher wave number. So this
may be considered as an indication of the degradation leading
(b) FTIR spectra of neat epoxy and epoxy alumina nanocomposite to the breakage of hydrogen bonds in the sample exposed to
(15 wt%) surface discharges. In the case of epoxy alumina
Figure 8. FTIR spectra of alumina filler, neat epoxy and epoxy alumina
nanocomposites, the degradation of –OH bands is not as
nanocomposite. intense as with neat epoxy. This may be due to the large
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
270 P. Preetha and M. J. Thomas: Partial Discharge Resistant Characteristics of Epoxy Nanocomposites
Figure 9. FTIR spectrum of unfilled epoxy and epoxy alumina (b) Epoxy alumina nanocomposite (0.1 wt%)
nanocomposites aged for 24 hours. Voltage applied is 10 kV.
Figure 10. ij-q-n distribution of unfilled epoxy and epoxy alumina
nanocomposite aged for 20 hours with 10 kV applied voltage.
number of hydrogen bonds that are formed between the filler
and the polymer resulting in a tightly bound region around the
filler. So the energy required for the discharge to penetrate in
to the material is more once the discharge encounters the
tightly bound region in the nanocomposites. It has also been
reported by Stephanie et al [23] that the increased bond
energies in the interphase enhance the material resistance to
degradation.
The other important observations from the FTIR spectrum
of aged epoxy samples are the formation of the carboxyl
groups and peracids which can lead to a change in the surface
conductivity with discharge. The carboxyl bands are shown
merged with C-C stretching vibration in the case of aged Figure 11. Average discharge magnitude at different durations of exposure
epoxy nanocomposites. Similar observations of enhanced for unfilled epoxy and 0.1 wt% epoxy alumina nanocomposite
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 1; February 2011 271
cycles for epoxy nanocomposites when compared with that of discharge extends over a substantial portion of the ac half
unfilled epoxy. It has also been observed that the number of cycle and visually appears as a diffuse glow. Also it is
pulses in the positive half cycle is very less in the case of reported that larger discharge pulses dominate when the time
epoxy nanocomposites when compared to that of unfilled of exposure is less than 200 h [25]. It has been observed that
epoxy. Figure 11 shows the average discharge magnitude for in the case of unfilled epoxy, the ij-q-n distribution shows
unfilled epoxy and 0.1 wt% epoxy alumina nanocomposite discharge pulses of larger magnitude and extending over
samples at various discharge durations. It is seen from the substantial portion of the ac half cycles. This may be an
figure that the average discharge magnitude which is indication of the presence of both pulse type and glow type
maximum at the start of the aging drops to a very low value discharges when unfilled epoxy is exposed to surface
and then increases with aging duration and then decreases. discharges for a duration of 20 h.
The decrease is more prominent in the case of nanocomposite The lesser number of PD pulses in the case of epoxy
for longer duration of discharge exposure. nanocomposite may be due to the reduction in the oxidation
The FTIR spectra of aged epoxy samples show the presence reactions happening on the surface due to the presence of
of -C=O of intra molecularly hydrogen bonded acids and - nanofillers and the polymer regions which are tightly bound to
CO-OOH bands of the peracids. This suggests an the nanofillers. The FTIR spectrum of epoxy nanocomposite
enhancement in the surface conductivity when unfilled epoxy shows overlapping of the carboxylic acid band with the C-C
is exposed to surface discharges. This change in the surface stretching vibration. So the surface conductivity of epoxy
conductivity may be due to the oxidation on the surface in the nanocomposites may be less when compared to unfilled epoxy
presence of reactive species in the atmospheric air formed by to induce a transition to glow type discharge. From the
the discharges. Hudon et al [24] has reported an increase in the average surface roughness measurements it was seen that the
surface conductivity for unfilled epoxy which modifies the Ra value was very much lower for nanocomposites at longer
electric field distribution and thereby inducing a transition of durations of discharge exposure. So in the case of
the spark type discharge to a glow type discharge. Spark nanocomposites, the reduction in the average PD magnitude
discharges are characterized by duration of the order of 10 to may be one of the reasons for the reduction in the average
100 ns, forming narrow luminous channels. The glow type of surface roughness.
Table 3. Infrared bands and assignments for unstressed and stressed epoxy nanocomposites.
Wave bands
Corresponding group assignments Unstressed Stressed for 24 h
(cm-1)
Moisture, acid and peracid indicated by
~3500 Hydroxyl Groups (–OH) Present
number of peaks
~3280 -CO-OOH peracids Not seen Present
~ 3043 &
C – H stretch in aromatic Present Depleted
3050
Methyl groups depleted, overlapping with
~2970 Asymmetrical C – H stretch of –CH3 group Present
–OH
~ 2930 Asymmetrical C–H stretch of –CH2 group Present Methylene groups depleted
~2875 Symmetrical C-H stretch of –CH2 Group Present Depleted
~1720 Carboxylic acid (C=O stretching vibration) Present Overlapping with other new bands
C=O in intra molecularly hydrogen bonded Not
~1659 Seen
acids present
~1605
~ 1580 Doublet of medium bands corresponding to
Seen
~ 1511 C–C stretching vibration in aromatics
~ 1460
~1347 N–O in nitrates and nitrites Not seen Strong Intensities
~ 1297 Asymmetrical – CH2 deformation Present
~ 1246 Asymmetrical aromatic C – O– C stretch Present
~ 1186 Asymmetrical aliphatic C – O stretch Present
~ 1032- Increase in number of bands implies new
Symmetrical aromatic C – O– C stretch Present
1100 bonds
~ 919 Epoxide ring vibrations Present
~ 828 – CH out of plane deformation in aromatic Present
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2
272 P. Preettha and M. J. Thomas:
Th Partial Discharge
D Resisstant Characteriistics of Epoxy N
Nanocompositess
3.5. DSC ME EASUREMEN NTS Tg vaalues would have decreased beyondb 0.5 wt%% filler loadingg
Differential Sccanning Calorrimetry (DSC) experiments were w also which
w is not thhe case in the present
p results.
connducted to meeasure the glasss transition teemperature (Tg) of In the
t present studdy, at 0.1 wt% nano-filler conncentration, thee
diffferent epoxy alumina
a nanocomposites in order
o to undersstand inter--particle distannces in the nanocomposites
n s are large ass
thee interface pheenomena. The glass transitioon temperaturees of show wn in Table 2 and the larrge loosely boound extendedd
epooxy alumina nanocomposiite with resppect to the filler f polym mer nanolayer may lead to an increase inn the mobilityy
conncentration aree shown in Figu ure 12. resultting in a reduuction in the nanocomposite
n Tg. When thee
The Tg of unffilled epoxy is 73 oC. It caan be seen thaat in filler concentration increases to 0.55 wt%, the voluume fraction off
nannocomposites, Tg decreases up u to 0.5% filleer loading and then looseely bound polym mer chains alsoo increases resuulting in the Tg
shoows an increasse when the filller concentratiion is increaseed up valuees to decrease further.
f As the filler concentrration increasess
to 15 wt%. A similar
s variation was reportted in a studyy by further, the inter-paarticle distancees start to reduuce which cann
Sanntanu et al [9].. This variation
n could be expplained on the basis
b resultt in an overlapp of the mobilee polymer regions around thee
of the dual layeer model for the nanocompposites, a picttorial nanopparticles [23]. This will lead to an increasee in the volumee
reppresentation off which is showwn in Figure 133. of immmobile polym mer regions in thet nanocompoosite leading too
A per the duaal layer model when the nanoofiller particles are
As an inncrease in the glass transitionn temperature as observed inn
the present study at higher filler looadings.
3.6
6. PHYSICAL
L MODEL TO
O EXPLAIN TH
HE SURFACE
DEGRADATION
N MECHANISSM
The enhancement in the degrradation resistance can bee
explaained on the basis
b of the physical
p model as shown inn
5 wt% 10 wt%
uniformly disperrsed in the epo oxy matrix, eaach of the partticles 15 wt%
will hold the epoxye materiaal around it. The first eppoxy
Fiigure 14. Physical model to explain thhe surface degradatiion mechanism.
nannolayer on thhe nanoparticle is tightly bound b due too the
hydrogen bondinng and it is hig ghly immobile. Then there iss the Figurre 14. Considering the dual layer model m of thee
looosely bound seecond layer wh hich contains polymer
p chainss that nanoccomposites, inn addition to thhe two epoxy regions at thee
aree loosely bounnd to the nanop particle. It has also been receently interfface which intteract with thee nanoparticless, a significantt
repported that therre is a significcant influence of
o humidity onn the volumme of loose epooxy is present in the nanocom mposite. This iss
Tg of nanocompoosites and the presence
p of a water
w nanolayeer on held together betweeen the nanoparrticles and do not
n interact withh
thee surface of thee nanoparticless can lead to a reduction in thhe Tg the nanoparticles.
n The volume of o this loose epoxy
e materiall
vallues [26]. Evven though there t are manny factors which
w depennds upon the filler concenntration. Whenn subjected too
inffluences the Tg, reports suggests that it is thhe interfacial layer
l electrrical dischargess, the epoxy regions which arre loose tend too
bettween the nannoparticle and the polymer thhat determiness the degraade faster than the material which
w is tightlyy bound to thee
glaass transition temperature of o the nanocoomposites [27-29]. nanopparticles. With a longer duratiion of dischargge exposure, thee
Also great care has
h been exercised while prepparing the sam mples degraadation begins tot expand eitheer along the deppth or the widthh
so that the influeence of humid dity is minimizzed. In additioon, if of thhe sample, whichever way thhere is least ressistance for thee
theere is a water nanolayer
n on the
t nanoparticlle surface, thenn the dischharge to propagate. Once the discharge encounters a
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 1; February 2011 273
nanoparticle, the progress is restricted and then the degradation Manufacturing and Coil Winding Conf., Cincinnati, OH , USA, pp.
expands along a direction where epoxy is present as the nano fillers 195–200, October 1999.
[3] L.A. Dissado and J.C. Fothergill, Electrical Degradation and
are more discharge resistant compared to the unfilled epoxy. From Breakdown in Polymers, Peter Peregrinus Ltd., London, UK,
Figure 14 it is clearly seen that at lower filler concentrations, the 1992.
number of nanoparticles are less and the interparticle distance is [4] R. Bruetsch, M. Tari, K. Froehlich, T. Weiers and R. Vogelsang,
very large. So the amount of loose epoxy present will be more and “High Voltage Insulation Failure Mechanisms”, IEEE Intern.
degradation proceeds through the loose material. With the increase Sympos.Electr. Insul., Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 162-165,
2008.
in the filler concentration, the interparticle distance is decreasing
[5] B. S. Nindra and A. Khazanov, “Semi-Conducting Corona
and it can be seen that at a filler concentration of 15 wt%, the Suppression System for High Voltage Windings”, Iris Rotating
interparticle distance is in the same order as that of the nanofiller Machine Conf. San Antonio, TX, USA, pp. 1-8, 2002.
diameter and so the second loosely bound layer may be negligible [6] J. A. Forster and L. F. Klataske, “IEEE Working Group Report
in this case. A reduction in the second loose polymer region will of Problems With Hydro generator Thermoset Stator Windings-
Part II - Detection, Correction and Prevention”, IEEE Trans.
restrict the mobility of the polymer chains. This is also observed
Power App. Syst., Vol. 100, pp. 3292-3300, 1981.
from the Tg variation where the Tg value increases with filler [7] J A Allison, “Understanding the need for Anti-corona Materials
concentration indicating a reduction of the mobility. So the tightly in High Voltage Rotating machines”, 6th Intern. Conf. Properties
bound first layer where the polymers are bonded to the nanofiller and Applications of Dielectric Materials, Xi’an Jiaotong
by hydrogen bonding is helpful in enhancing the degradation University, Xi’an, China, pp. 860-863, 2000.
resistance to surface discharge. [8] Y. Cao, P. C. Irwin and K. Younsi, “The Future of
Nanodielectrics in the Electrical Power Industry”, IEEE Trans.
Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 11, pp. 797-807, 2004.
4 CONCLUSIONS [9] S. Singha and M. Joy Thomas, “Dielectric Properties of Epoxy
Epoxy alumina nanocomposites of various filler loadings have Nanocomposites”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol.15,
pp. 12-23, 2008.
improved resistance to surface discharge degradation. It was
[10] M. Kozako, N.Fuse, Y. Ohki, T.Okamoto, T.Tanaka, “Surface
observed that even at low filler concentration, epoxy Degradation of Polyamide Nanocomposites Caused by Partial
nanocomposites offer improved degradation resistance. With Discharges Using IEC(b) Electrodes”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr.
increase in the filler concentration, the discharge resistance also Electr. Insul., Vol.11, pp. 833-839, 2004.
increases. This increase was found to be prominent at longer [11] M Kozako, R Kido, T Imai, T Ozaki, T Shimizu and T. Tanaka,
“Surface Roughness Change of Epoxy/TiO 2 Nanocomposites due
durations of discharge exposure. It was also observed that the to Partial Discharges”, Intern. Sympos. Electrical Insulating
interparticle distance has a significant effect on the surface Materials, Kitakyushu, Japan, pp. 661-664, 2005.
discharge induced degradation. With increase in the filler [12] T Tanaka, T Yazawa, Y Ohki, M Ochi, M Harada and T Imai,
concentration, the interparticle distance decreases and the interface “Frequency Accelerated Partial Discharge Resistance of Epoxy/
become highly immobile thus resisting the degradation. It was also Clay Nanocomposite Prepared by Newly Developed Organic
Modification and Solubilization Methods”, IEEE Intern. Conf.
observed that with longer duration of discharge exposure, the Solid Dielectrics (ICSD), Winchester, UK, pp. 337-340, 2007.
magnitude of PD decreases for nanocomposites than for unfilled [13] N. Fuse, Y. Ohki, M. Kozako and T. Tanaka, “Possible
epoxy. This may be due to the difference in the surface Mechanisms of Superior Resistance of Polyamide
conductivity of epoxy and epoxy nanocomposites when exposed Nanocomposites to Partial Discharges and Plasmas”, IEEE
Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 15, pp. 161-170, 2008.
to discharges and the transition of the PD pulses from spark to [14] D.M. Hepburn, I.J. Kemp, A.J. Shields and J. Cooper,
glow due to this change in surface conductivity. A generalized “Degradation of Epoxy Resin by Partial Discharges”, IEE Proc.
model based on the dual layer model for the nanocomposites has Sci., Measurement Techn., Vol. 147, pp.97-104, 2000.
been proposed which takes into consideration the effect of [15] D.M. Hepburn, I. J. Kemp, A. J. Shields and R. T. Richardson,
“The Degradation of Epoxy Resin by Partial Discharge
interparticle distance on the surface discharge degradation. Stressing”, IEEE 4th Intern. Conf. Properties and Applications of
Dielectric Materials, Brisbane, Australia, pp.31-34, 1994.
[16] D.M. Hepburn, I.J. Kemp, R.T. Richardson, “Partial Discharge
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Stressing of Filled Epoxy Resin Surfaces”, 7th Intern. Conf.
The authors would like to thank IRIS, IPC department, IISc Dielectric Materials, Measurements & Applications, University
Bangalore for the help in conducting the FTIR studies, Nanoscience of Bath, UK, pp. 330-333,1996.
centre, IISc for the support in conducting the SEM studies and the [17] T. Tanaka, M. Kozako, N. Fuse and Y. Ohki, “Proposal of a
Multi-core Model for Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics”,
Nanotribology laboratory, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering for IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol.12, pp. 669-681, 2005.
making available the surface profilometer. The authors would like to [18] T. Tanaka, G.C. Montanari, R. Mulhaupt, “Polymer
thank Dr. Sundar Rajan, CPRI for making available the PD detector Nanocomposites as Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation –
for the present study. The authors would like to thank Ms. Bhavana Prospective for Processing Technologies, Material
Characterisation and Future Applications”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr.
for the help in conducting the FTIR studies and Mr. Sridhar Alapati Electr. Insul., Vol.11, pp. 763-784, 2004.
and Dr. Santanu Singha for the technical discussions. [19] S. Singha and M. J. Thomas, “Polymer
Composite/Nanocomposite Processing and its Effect on the
Electrical Properties”, IEEE Conf. Electr. Insul. Dielectr.
REFERENCES Phenomena (CEIDP), Kansas City, USA, pp. 557-560, 2006.
[1] M. Farahani, H. Borsi, and E. Gockenbach, “Partial Discharge and [20] G. Socrates. Infrared Characteristic Group frequencies, John
Dissipation Factor Behavior of Model Insulating Systems for High Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.
Voltage Rotating Machines Under Different Stresses”, IEEE Electr. Insul. [21] S,. Singha and M J. Thomas, “Reduction of Permittivity in
Magazine, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 5-19, 2005. Epoxy Nanocomposites at Low Nano-filler Loadings”, IEEE
[2] M. Hoof and S. Lanz, “PD Diagnostics on Rotating Machines— Conf. Electr. Insul. Dielectr. Phenomena (CEIDP), Quebec City,
Possibilities and Limitation”, IEEE Electr. Insul. Conf. and Electrical Canada, pp. 726-729, 2008.
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2
274 P. Preettha and M. J. Thomas:
Th Partial Discharge
D Resisstant Characteriistics of Epoxy N
Nanocompositess
Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSITY TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA. Downloaded on December 08,2022 at 03:45:52 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.