0% found this document useful (0 votes)
211 views8 pages

Macroeconomics 1 Problem Set 1 Sol PDF

The document contains an analytical problem set on macroeconomics. It discusses properties of neoclassical production functions like the Cobb-Douglas and CES functions. It proves: (1) the Cobb-Douglas function satisfies properties of constant returns to scale, positive and diminishing marginal returns, and the Inada conditions; (2) Euler's theorem applies to the Cobb-Douglas function; (3) the more general CES function satisfies constant returns to scale and positive/diminishing marginal returns. It also shows that the CES function converges to the Cobb-Douglas form as the elasticity of substitution approaches 1.

Uploaded by

Taib Muffak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
211 views8 pages

Macroeconomics 1 Problem Set 1 Sol PDF

The document contains an analytical problem set on macroeconomics. It discusses properties of neoclassical production functions like the Cobb-Douglas and CES functions. It proves: (1) the Cobb-Douglas function satisfies properties of constant returns to scale, positive and diminishing marginal returns, and the Inada conditions; (2) Euler's theorem applies to the Cobb-Douglas function; (3) the more general CES function satisfies constant returns to scale and positive/diminishing marginal returns. It also shows that the CES function converges to the Cobb-Douglas form as the elasticity of substitution approaches 1.

Uploaded by

Taib Muffak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Macroeconomics I

Analytical Problem Set # 1


Marti Mestieri Ferrer, UPF, BSE

This is due Thursday January 19th

Exercise # 1: Neoclassical production functions

(a) Show that the Cobb-Douglas production function:

F (K, L) = K α L1−α

is a Neoclassical production function.

(i) Linear Homogeneity: we know that a production function is homogenous of


degree one if:

F (λK, λL) = λF (K, L)

Then, we have to prove that:

F (λK, λL) = (λK)α (λL)1−α = K α L1−α

Proof.
(λK)α (λL)1−α = λα λ1−α K α L1−α = K α L1−α

(ii) Positive and diminishing marginal returns: we have to prove that:

1
FK (K, L) > 0 and FKK (K, L) < 0 ∀K > 0, ∀L > 0
FL (K, L) > 0 and FLL (K, L) < 0 ∀K > 0, ∀L > 0

We’ll focus on the case of K, but a similar proof applies for L.


Proof.

∂F (K, L) α−1 1−α L 1−α


FK (K, L) = = αK L = α( ) >0 ∀K, L > 0, α ∈ (0, 1)
∂K K

K α−1
∂ 2 F (K, L) ∂ [α ( L ) ] L 1−α 1
FKK (K, L) = = = (α−1)α ( ) ( ) < 0 ∀K, L > 0, α ∈ (0, 1)
∂ 2K ∂K K K

(iii) Inada conditions: We have to prove that:

lim FK (K, L) → ∞ and lim FK (K, L) → 0 ∀L > 0


K→0 K→∞

lim FL (K, L) → ∞ and lim FL (K, L) → 0 ∀K > 0


L→0 L→∞

Again, we’ll focus on the case of K, but a similar proof applies for L.
Proof.
L 1−α
lim FK (K, L) = lim α ( ) = α∞1−α = ∞
K→0 K→0 K
L 1−α
lim FK (K, L) = lim α ( ) = α01−α = 0
K→∞ K→∞ K

(b) Euler’s Theorem: A version of Euler’s Theorem is represented by the following


statement. Suppose that the function f (x, y) is continuously differentiable. Then,
f is positive homogeneous of degree 1 if and only if

fx (x, y)x + fy (x, y)y = f (x, y)

where fi (x, y) = ∂f (x,y)


∂i . Show that the theorem applies to the case of a Cobb-Douglas
production function.

2
We have to prove that:

FK (K, L)K + FL (K, L)L = F (K, L)

Proof.

αK α−1 L1−α K + (1 − α)K α L−α L = αK α L1−α + (1 − α)K α L1−α = F (K, L)

(c) Consider a more general class of production functions known as “Constant Elasticity
of Substitution (CES)” production functions:

σ
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
Y = F (K, L) = [αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ]

Prove that this general type of functions satisfies the first two properties of Neo-
classical production functions: (i) constant returns to scale and (ii) Positive and
diminishing marginal returns. Ignore the Inada conditions.
HINTS:

• The proof for -(i) constant returns to scale- is easy


• To make calculations simpler when proving (ii) Positive and diminishing marginal
returns (FKK (K, L) < 0), keep the expressions as compact as possible. In par-
Y
ticular, try to get final expression for FKK (K, L) that depends on α, σ, K ,
FK (K, L), and F (K, L). You can then make use of Euler’s theorem.

(i) Linear Homogeneity: we know that a production function is homogeneous of


degree one if:

F (λK, λL) = λF (K, L)

Then, we have to prove that:

σ
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
F (λK, λL) = [α(λK) σ + (1 − α)(λL) σ ]

3
Proof.
σ σ
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
[α(λK) σ + (1 − α)(λL) σ ] = [λ σ αK σ +λ σ (1 − α)L σ ]
σ
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
[λ σ (αK σ + (1 − α)L σ )] = λF (K, L)

(ii) Positive and diminishing marginal returns:


Proof.

σ−1 σ−1 −1
σ
σ σ−1
αK σ −1
σ−1 σ−1
FK (K, L) = [αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ]
σ−1 σ
σ
−1
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
−1
= [αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ] αK σ

1
1
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1 − σ1 1
− σ1 Y σ
= [αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ] αK =Y K σ α = α( ) > 0
K
∀ K, L > 0, α ∈ (0, 1), σ > 0

Proof.

Y σ −1 1
1
1 Y
FKK (K, L) = ( ) α ( ) [( ) FK (K, L) − 2 ]
σ K K K
1−σ
1 Y σ KFK (K, L) − F (K, L)
= ( )α( ) [ ]
σ K K2

We know what, by the positive marginal returns + Euler Theorem, [ KFK (K,L)−F
K2
(K,L)
]<
0 ⇒ FKK (K, L) < 0

(d) Show that the CES production function converges to the Cobb-Douglas function
when σ → 1
HINT: follow the following steps

• Take natural logs on the CES production function


• Take the constant that multiplies what it’s inside the log and invert it so you
can write an expression like:

ln of something that depends on α, σ, K, and L


lnY =
something that depends on σ

4
• Your goal is to compute the limit of that expression when σ → 1. In order to
do so, apply the l’Hopital’s rule, which says the following:

f (x) f ′ (x) f (x)


if lim exists ⇒ lim ′ = lim
x→c g(x) x→c g (x) x→c g(x)

• Define your numerator as f (x) and your denominator as g(x), where x = σ


• Take the derivatives of these two functions with respect to σ. You will have to
make use of the following properties of derivatives:

∂lnh(x) h′ (x)
=
∂x h(x)
∂a h(x)
= ah(x) ln(a)h′ (x)
∂x

• You are almost done. Just take the limit:

f ′ (σ)
lim
σ→1 g ′ (σ)

• Most of the terms should equal one and cancel out. You should get a final
expression like this:

f ′ (σ)
lim = lim lnY = αlnK + (1 − α)lnL
σ→1 g ′ (σ) σ→1

• Taking the exponential on both sides will conclude the proof.

Proof.

(i) We first take logs in the production function:

σ−1 σ−1
σ σ−1 σ−1
ln ([αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ])
lnY = ln ([αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ]) = σ−1
σ−1 σ

(ii) We define:

σ−1 σ−1
f (σ) = ln ([αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ])
σ−1
g(σ) =
σ

5
(iii) We take derivatives of these two functions:

σ−1 σ−1
α [K σ lnK ( σ12 )] + (1 − α) [L σ lnL ( σ12 )]

f (σ) = σ−1 σ−1
[αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ]
1
g ′ (σ) =
σ2

f ′ (σ)
(iv) Taking the limit of g ′ (σ) when σ → 1 will conclude the proof

Excersise # 2: Elasticity of substitution between labor and capital

Let’s define the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor as:

∂ln ( K
L
)
ϵ≡
∂ln ( wr )
where w and r are the prices of labor and capital respectively.

(a) Assume that a representative firm producing in perfect competition has access to
the following CES production function:

σ
σ−1 σ−1 σ−1
Y = F (K, L) = [αK σ + (1 − α)L σ ]

(i) Define the profit maximization problem of the firm


HINT: In perfect competition firms take all prices as given (P , w, and r).
Normalize P to be equal to 1.

max{P Y − wL − rK}
K,L

(ii) Compute the FOC conditions with respect to labor and capital

6
σ−1
−1
σ σ−1 σ−1 σ σ−1 σ−1
−1
L∶ σ−1 [αK σ (1 − α)L σ ] σ (1 − α)L
σ −w =0
σ−1
−1
σ σ−1 σ−1 σ σ−1 σ−1
−1
K∶ σ−1 [αK σ αK σ ] σ (1 − α)L
σ −r =0

(iii) Combine the two FOC and calculate ϵ

1 − α L −σ w
1
K α σ w σ K α w
( ) = ⇒ =( ) ( ) ⇒ ln = σln ( ) + σln ( )
α K r L 1−α r L 1−α r

Then,

∂ln ( K
L
)
ϵ≡ =σ
∂ln ( wr )

(iv) Use the FOC of capital to compute the share of capital in total income defined
as:

rK
Y
How does this change when r increases? What parametrization would make
the evolution of PrKY consistent with the Kaldor fact that states that the income
share of capital should be constant over time?
HINT: This relationship depends on the value of σ. Remember that σ can take
any value as long as σ > 0
Manipulating the FOC of capital we get:
1
Y σ
( ) α=r
K

Manipulating this expression we get:

rK
= ασ r1−σ
Y
rK
Which implies that the sign of the relationship between Y and r depends on
the value of σ.
• σ ∈ (0, 1): ↑ r ⇒ rK
Y ↑

7
• σ > 1: ↑ r ⇒ rK
Y ↓
• σ = 1: ↑ r ⇒ rK
Y =α

You might also like