The documentary discusses the immoral killings that occurred in the Philippines under President Duterte's war on drugs. Thousands were killed by masked men, sometimes police or thugs, simply for being accused of drug use or dealing without due process. While Duterte's goal was to curb drug use, the campaign was tainted by extrajudicial killings. The documentary argues that education, rather than violence and fear, could have achieved the goal in a moral way without destroying lives like the killing of a 16-year-old child.
The documentary discusses the immoral killings that occurred in the Philippines under President Duterte's war on drugs. Thousands were killed by masked men, sometimes police or thugs, simply for being accused of drug use or dealing without due process. While Duterte's goal was to curb drug use, the campaign was tainted by extrajudicial killings. The documentary argues that education, rather than violence and fear, could have achieved the goal in a moral way without destroying lives like the killing of a 16-year-old child.
The documentary discusses the immoral killings that occurred in the Philippines under President Duterte's war on drugs. Thousands were killed by masked men, sometimes police or thugs, simply for being accused of drug use or dealing without due process. While Duterte's goal was to curb drug use, the campaign was tainted by extrajudicial killings. The documentary argues that education, rather than violence and fear, could have achieved the goal in a moral way without destroying lives like the killing of a 16-year-old child.
The documentary discusses the immoral killings that occurred in the Philippines under President Duterte's war on drugs. Thousands were killed by masked men, sometimes police or thugs, simply for being accused of drug use or dealing without due process. While Duterte's goal was to curb drug use, the campaign was tainted by extrajudicial killings. The documentary argues that education, rather than violence and fear, could have achieved the goal in a moral way without destroying lives like the killing of a 16-year-old child.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Agraaam, Cashmir Angelo J.
March 13, 2023
STEM 12 – St. Agatha Introduction: “Just because they are pushers, will kill them, No. They are humans, we have to look at them as humans” is the sentence that struck me most in a documentary by CBC News: The National “Horror of the Philippines' drug war” talks about the immoral killings of masked men sometimes police or thugs began killings to stop the so-called transformation of the Philippines into a narco-state of drug usage. The moral issue of the documentary is the unresolved and ludicrous killing of so-called “drug pushers or addicts” by thugs and policemen. The immoral ways these victims are subjected to are saddening, to be killed just because you are accused of a crime that you have not yet been proven guilty of is an abuse of power. These incidents happen during the drug war under the presidency of President Duterte, these killings started since according to him the Philippines is a den of drugs and drug addicts. For him to establish control and stop the flow of drugs he orders all possible suspects of drug pushing or selling to be killed or imprisoned. The campaign lessened the spread of drugs in the nation, but it was tainted by extrajudicial executions that were purportedly carried out by the police and unidentified assailants. At a news conference on July 7, 2016, Duterte displays a diagram of drug cartels. When I was younger I agreed to the killings of the drug war since I was still ignorant of how the different victims of this campaign were affected. I have now realized that I was under vincible ignorance because no matter how big of a problem drugs may have posed, the killing of a 16-year-old is a belligerent act. The issue of this documentary is fear and violence, due to the fear of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte and the effects of drugs on the country he enforced a strict and brutal way to end it. He imposed not only violence but also fear in the Philippines. Although his intentions were good to stop drug trafficking in the Philippines, the way he enforced it was bad and morally wrong. Another illustration of the harsh stance the government takes against individuals who are in need of basic necessities is the abusive techniques employed to punish those accused of violating quarantine and the enormous number of mass arrests that have been made to date, primarily against the poor. In conclusion, I do not agree with the way that president duterte handled the situation of drugs in the Philippines. I agree that we should imprison and punish those who try to ruin our society, but being able to point and shoot them without hesitance would be a scary society to live. I believe that he could’ve ended the flow of drugs in the Philippines without using violence and fear, educating poverty-stricken cities about the use of drugs would have been a moral way of stopping the improper use of illegal drugs. Killing a 16- year-old child is the same as destroying the future.