Laporan Alam Sekitar-JAS 2020
Laporan Alam Sekitar-JAS 2020
Laporan Alam Sekitar-JAS 2020
ING ENV
L I L IR
E ON
E K M
S
E
AM
N
TA
AL
L
N KUALITI
QUA
LITY R
R A
E
PO
P O
A
R
L
2020
KEMENTERIAN
ALAM SEKITAR DAN AIR
Ministry of Environment and Water
ING ENV
L I L IR
E ON
E K M
S
E
AM
N
TA
AL
L
N KUALITI
QUA
LITY R
R A
E
O
P
P
O
A
R
L
2020
Department of Environment, Malaysia
Copyright 2020 DOE
ISSN 2636-9834
KANDUNGAN / CONTENTS
BAB 1 | CHAPTER 1
KUALITI UDARA | AIR QUALITY
• Pengawasan Kualiti Udara / Air Quality Monitoring ................................................................................................. 10
• Status Kualiti Udara / Air Quality Status ...................................................................................................................... 11
• Tren Kualiti Udara / Air Quality Trend ........................................................................................................................... 23
BAB 2 | CHAPTER 2
KUALITI AIR SUNGAI | RIVER WATER QUALITY
• Program Pengawasan Kualiti Alam Sekitar / .............................................................................................................. 38
The Environmental Quality Monitoring Programme (EQMP)
• Pengawasan Kualiti Air Sungai Manual / Manual River Water Quality Monitoring ..................................... 38
• Status Kualiti Air Sungai / River Water Quality Status ............................................................................................ 39
• Tren Pencemaran Air Sungai / Trends in River Water Pollution .......................................................................... 60
• Logam Berat Dalam Sungai / Heavy Metals in River ............................................................................................... 64
• Kualiti Air Sungai Di Hulu Muka Sauk / Quality of River Water at Upstream Intakes .................................. 64
• Status Pengawasan Kualiti Air Sungai Automatik / ................................................................................................. 72
Status of Continuous/Automatic River Water Quality Monitoring (CRWQM)
BAB 3 | CHAPTER 3
KUALITI AIR TANAH | GROUNDWATER QUALITY
• Pengawasan Kualiti Air Tanah / Groundwater Quality Monitoring ................................................................... 84
• Status Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Kawasan Pertanian / ................................................................................................... 88
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
• Status Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Bangkai Haiwan / ................................................................ 100
Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Used Animal Burial Sites
• Status Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Akuakultur / ...........................................................................................................................
102
Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Aquaculture
• Status Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Peranginan / ......................................................................................................................... 104
Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Resorts
• Status Kualiti Air Tanah / Groundwater Quality Status .................................................................................................. 106
BAB 4 | CHAPTER 4
KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU | MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY
• Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin / Marine Water Quality Monitoring ........................................................................... 112
• Status Stesen-Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin / Status of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations ...... 117
• Status Kualiti Air Marin Pantai / Coastal Water Quality Status .................................................................................... 122
• Status Kualiti Air Muara Sungai / Estuary Water Quality Status ................................................................................. 128
• Kualiti Air Marin Pulau / Island Marine Water Quality .................................................................................................... 132
• Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin Automatik / Continuous Marine Water Quality Monitoring ............................. 142
BAB 5 | CHAPTER 5
INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN | POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY
• Pengiraan Beban Pencemaran / Pollution Load Calculation ....................................................................................... 148
• Beban Pencemaran Air / Water Pollution Load ................................................................................................................. 149
• Punca-Punca Pencemaran Udara / Sources of Air Pollution ....................................................................................... 156
• Beban Pencemaran Pencemar Udara / Air Pollution Emission Load ........................................................................ 158
ANNEX
• Standard Kualiti Air Negara / National Water Quality Standards for Malaysia ...................................................... 172
• Kelas Air dan Penggunaan / Water Classes and Uses ..................................................................................................... 173
• Pengkelasan Kualiti Air berdasarkan Indeks Kualiti Air Jabatan Alam Sekitar / .................................................... 174
Department of Environment Water Quality Classification Based on Water Quality Index
• Pengkelasan Indeks Kualiti Air Jabatan Alam Sekitar / .................................................................................................. 174
Department of Environment Water Quality Index Classification
• Formula dan Pengiraan Indeks Kualiti Air / Water Quality Index Formula and Calculation ............................. 174
• Formula dan Pengiraan Indeks Kualiti Air Marin Malaysia / ......................................................................................... 175
Malaysian Marine Water Quality Index Formula and Calculation
• Pengiraan Ammonia Tidak Terion / Unionized Ammonia Calculation ..................................................................... 176
• Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah / Groundwater Quality Index ................................................................................................... 178
6
PRAKATA / FOREWORD
“Alam Sekitar,Tanggungjawab Bersama
Environment, Our Shared Responsibility.”
S
aya amat berbesar hati untuk membentangkan
Laporan Kualiti Alam Sekeliling 2020 seperti
yang dikehendaki di bawah Seksyen 3(1)(i) Akta
Kualiti Alam Sekeliling 1974.
baik di Malaysia.
Kualiti air sungai yang ditentukan dari segi Indeks Kualiti Air The river quality in terms of Water Quality Index (WQI)
(IKA) telah menunjukkan peningkatan pada tahun 2020. showed an increase in 2020. Out of the 672 rivers
Peratus bilangan sungai yang dikategorikan sebagai monitored, 66% showed clean water quality in 2020. The
bersih pada tahun 2020 adalah sebanyak 66% daripada percentage of slightly polluted rivers and polluted rivers
672 sungai yang diawasi. Peratus bilangan sungai yang were 29% and 5% respectively.
dikategorikan sebagai sederhana tercemar adalah
sebanyak 29%, manakala peratus bilangan sungai yang
dikategorikan sebagai tercemar adalah sebanyak 5%.
Pada tahun 2020, kualiti air tanah menunjukkan pematuhan The groundwater quality in 2020 showed compliance
terhadap Standard Kualiti Air Tanah Bagi Rawatan Air Mentah with the Groundwater Quality Standards for Conventional
Secara Konvensional (Air Minuman) bagi semua parameter Raw Water Treatment (Drinking Water) except for
yang diawasi kecuali parameter mangan (Mn), jumlah manganese (Mn), total coliform, iron (Fe) and phenolics
kolifom, besi (Fe) dan sebatian fenol yang mempunyai which showed low percentage of compliance.
peratusan julat nilai pematuhan yang rendah.
Dalam tahun 2020, daripada 368 stesen pengawasan In 2020, out of the 368 marine water quality monitoring
kualiti air marin bagi pantai, muara sungai dan pulau di stations at coastal, estuary and islands in the country, 104
negara ini, sebanyak 104 stesen adalah terbaik, 56 stesen stations were excellent, 56 were good, 190 were moderate
baik, 190 stesen sederhana manakala 18 stesen yang while the remaining 18 stations were categorised as
lain dikategorikan tercemar. 4 daripada stesen tercemar poor. 4 of the poor stations were located at the coastal,
berada di kawasan pantai, 13 di kawasan muara sungai 13 were located at estuary while the remaining 1 was
dan 1 stesen di kawasan pulau. located at the island.
Pada tahun 2020 sebanyak 7,185,227.76 tan metrik buangan In 2020, a total of 7,185,227.76 metric tonnes of
terjadual telah dihasilkan. Ini mewakili peningkatan scheduled wastes were generated. This represents an
keseluruhan sebanyak 79.04% berbanding 4,013,189.03 overall increase of 79.04% as compared to 4,013,189.03
tan metrik yang dilaporkan pada 2019. JAS akan terus metric tonnes reported in 2019. DOE will continue to
BAB 1
CHAPTER 1
KUALITI UDARA
AIR QUALITY
10 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
Pada tahun 2020, dunia telah dikejutkan dengan In early 2020, the world was shocked and shaken by the
kehadiran virus Covid-19 yang diisytiharkan sebagai Covid-19 virus, and a pandemic was declared by the
pandemik oleh Pertubuhan Kesihatan Sedunia (WHO) World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020. In
pada 11 Mac 2020. Sebagai tindakan kawalan penyebaran an effort to control the spread of the virus in Malaysia,
virus ini di Malaysia, arahan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan a Movement Control Order (MCO) was issued where
(PKP) telah dikeluarkan di mana premis dan sekolah premises and schools were closed, people were instructed
ditutup, orang ramai diarahkan untuk duduk di rumah to stay at home and only essential sectors were allowed
dan hanya sektor yang perlu sahaja dibenarkan untuk to operate. The implementation of this MCO affected the
beroperasi. Pelaksanaan PKP ini telah memberi kesan status of air quality in the country.
kepada status kualiti udara di dalam negara.
Status kualiti udara di Malaysia ditunjukkan menerusi The air quality status is reflected as the Air Pollutant
bacaan Indeks Pencemar Udara (IPU) dan bacaan Index (API) and this is reported in the website of the
IPU seluruh negara sentiasa dipaparkan di laman Department of Environment (DOE) in its Air Pollutant
sesawang Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS), Air Pollutant Index Management System (APIMS) . The API is calculated
Index Management System (APIMS). IPU adalah dikira based on the concentration of six (6) major pollutants
berdasarkan kepekatan enam (6) bahan pencemar utama in the air, which are ground level ozone (O3), carbon
iaitu ozon di permukaan bumi (O3), karbon monoksida monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulphur dioxide
(CO), nitrogen dioksida (NO2), sulfur dioksida (SO2), (SO2), particulate matter of less than 10 microns in size
habuk halus bersaiz kurang dari 10 mikron (PM10) dan (PM10) and particulate matter of less than 2.5 microns in
habuk halus bersaiz kurang dari 2.5 mikron (PM2.5). IPU size (PM2.5). The API is categorized as good, moderate,
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
ini dikategorikan sebagai baik, sederhana, tidak sihat, unhealthy, very unhealthy and hazardous as presented
sangat tidak sihat dan berbahaya seperti yang dinyatakan in Table 1.1.
dalam Jadual 1.1.
0 – 50 Baik / Good
51 – 100 Sederhana / Moderate
101 – 200 Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy
201 – 300 Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy
> 300 Berbahaya / Hazardous
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 11
Kesan daripada beberapa siri arahan PKP yang telah As a result of a series of MCO directives by the Government
dikeluarkan oleh Kerajaan sepanjang tahun 2020, IPU in 2020, the overall API for Malaysia in 2020 showed a
bagi keseluruhan Malaysia pada tahun 2020 telah significant increase in air quality indicated from the good
menunjukkan peningkatan kualiti udara yang ketara yang and moderate levels achieved when compared with the
terjemahkan dalam bentuk peratus IPU berstatus baik API during the same period in 2019. Limited industrial,
dan sederhana yang lebih baik. Aktiviti industri, komersial commercial and social activities during the MCO period
dan sosial yang terhad sepanjang tempoh PKP ini telah made an impact, resulting in improved air quality in
meningkatkan kualiti udara di Malaysia berbanding Malaysia compared to 2019. Moreover, the wet weather
dengan tahun 2019. Dalam pada itu, keadaaan cuaca conditions and no transboundary haze in 2020 further
yang lebih lembap dan tiada kejadian jerebu merentas contributed to better air quality conditions in Malaysia.
sempadan pada tahun 2020 turut menyumbang kepada This is shown in the PM2.5 daily concentration trend in the
keadaan kualiti udara yang lebih baik di Malaysia. Ini Klang area, which normally records high API readings
ditunjukkan di dalam tren kepekatan harian PM2.5 di each year but was notably lower in year 2020 compared
kawasan Klang, yang kebiasaannya merekodkan bacaan to 2019. However, the concentration of PM2.5 in Klang
IPU yang tinggi setiap tahun tetapi didapati lebih rendah was relatively high at the beginning of the year before
pada tahun 2020 berbanding dengan tahun 2019. the imposed MCO, as shown in Figure 1.1 (a).
Walau bagaimanapun kepekatan PM2.5 di Klang adalah
agak tinggi sedikit pada awal tahun sebelum arahan PKP
seperti yang ditunjukkan di dalam Rajah 1.1(a).
Rajah 1.1(b) menunjukkan perbandingan kepekatan Figure 1.1(b) shows the daily concentrations of PM2.5 for
harian PM2.5 bagi tiga (3) jenis kategori stesen terpilih di the three (3) selected stations in urban (Klang), suburban
kawasan bandar (Klang), pinggir bandar (Kuantan) dan (Kuantan) and rural (Kapit) areas in the country. The
luar bandar (Kapit). Tren menunjukkan kepekatan PM2.5 trend showed higher levels of PM2.5 in the urban area
adalah lebih tinggi di kawasan bandar berbanding compared with the suburban and rural ones. However,
kawasan pinggir bandar dan luar bandar. Walau the concentration trend for these three (3) stations was
Selain PM2.5, pencemar udara lain yang sangat signifikan Apart from PM2.5, another significant air pollutant is the
adalah parameter ozon di permukaan bumi (O3.). Ia ground level ozone (O3) parameter. O3 pollutants are
terhasil akibat tindak balas sebatian-sebatian organik formed when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and
meruap (Volatile Organic Compounds, VOCs) dan oksid- nitrogen oxides (NOx) react in the atmosphere in the
oksid nitrogen (NOx) dengan kehadiran cahaya matahari. presence of sunlight. Formation of O3 is compounded
Cuaca panas terik menggalakkan lagi pembentukan during hot and sunny days. Major sources of VOCs and
pencemar O3 . Punca utama VOCs dan NOx adalah dari NOx emissions are primarily from industries and motor
pelepasan industri dan ekzos kenderaan bermotor vehicle emissions, particularly in urban areas. This is seen
terutama di bandar-bandar besar. Ini disebabkan dari in the increase in O3 at various locations in the Klang
peningkatan kepekatan O3 di beberapa lokasi di Lembah Valley and states adjacent to Klang Valley such as Perak
Klang dan negeri-negeri berdekatan Lembah Klang iaitu and Negeri Sembilan.
Perak dan Negeri Sembilan.
Kadangkala terdapat kepekatan maksimum harian bagi Occasionally, the daily maximum 1-hour concentration of
parameter O3 dalam tempoh 1 jam adalah melebihi O3 exceeds the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Standard,
Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia terutamanya di at several stations in the Klang Valley, Perak and Negeri
beberapa kawasan di Lembah Klang, Perak dan Negeri Sembilan as shown in Figure 1.1(c), Figure 1.1(d)
Sembilan seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.1(c), and Figure 1.1(e). This is due to the release of ground
Rajah 1.1(d) dan Rajah 1.1(e). Keadaan ini adalah ozone level precursors for pollutant gases in some areas
disebabkan oleh pelepasan gas pencemar O3 iaitu di especially in the central business areas with heavy traffic
kawasan-kawasan pusat perniagaan yang tinggi dan volume. During the MCO, the number of vehicles on the
berkepadatan trafik. Semasa PKP, bilangan kenderaaan di road decreased resulting in O3 concentrations for those
jalan raya berkurangan dan didapati kepekatan O3 bagi areas being below the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality
kawasan-kawasan tersebut di bawah daripada Standard Standards.
Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia yang ditetapkan.
160
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
140
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
120 2019
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi PM₂.₅ (IT-2) = 50 µg/m³ 2020
100 Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guidelines for PM₂.₅ (IT-2) = 50 µg/m³
80
60
40
20
0
1-Jan-20
11-Jan-20
21-Jan-20
31-Jan-20
10-Feb-20
20-Feb-20
1-Mac-20
11-Mac-20
21-Mac-20
31-Mac-20
10-Apr-20
20-Apr-20
30-Apr-20
10-May-20
20-May-20
30-May-20
9-Jun-20
19-Jun-20
29-Jun-20
9-Jul-20
19-Jul-20
29-Jul-20
8-Aug-20
18-Aug-20
28-Aug-20
7-Sep-20
17-Sep-20
27-Sep-20
7-Oct-20
17-Oct-20
27-Oct-20
6-Nov-20
16-Nov-20
26-Nov-20
6-Dec-20
16-Dec-20
26-Dec-20
Tarikh / Date
Rajah 1.1(a) Tren Kepekatan 24 jam bagi Habuk Halus (PM₂.₅), Klang 2019 dan 2020
Figure 1.1(a) Trend of 24-hour Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM₂.₅), Klang 2019 and 2020
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 13
100
90 Klang (Urban)
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi PM₂.₅ (IT-2) = 50 µg/m³
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guidelines for PM₂.₅ (IT-2) = 50 µg/m³ Kuantan (Suburban)
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
80
Kapit (Rural)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1-Jan-20
11-Jan-20
21-Jan-20
31-Jan-20
10-Feb-20
20-Feb-20
1-Mac-20
11-Mac-20
21-Mac-20
31-Mac-20
10-Apr-20
20-Apr-20
30-Apr-20
10-May-20
20-May-20
30-May-20
9-Jun-20
19-Jun-20
29-Jun-20
9-Jul-20
19-Jul-20
29-Jul-20
8-Aug-20
18-Aug-20
28-Aug-20
7-Sep-20
17-Sep-20
27-Sep-20
7-Oct-20
17-Oct-20
27-Oct-20
6-Nov-20
16-Nov-20
26-Nov-20
6-Dec-20
16-Dec-20
26-Dec-20
Tarikh / Date
Rajah 1.1(b) : Tren Kepekatan 24 jam bagi Habuk Halus (PM₂.₅), 2020
Figure 1.1(b) : Trend of 24-hour Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM₂.₅), 2020
0.18
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
1-Jan-20
11-Jan-20
21-Jan-20
31-Jan-20
10-Feb-20
20-Feb-20
1-Mac-20
11-Mac-20
21-Mac-20
31-Mac-20
10-Apr-20
20-Apr-20
30-Apr-20
10-May-20
20-May-20
30-May-20
9-Jun-20
19-Jun-20
29-Jun-20
9-Jul-20
19-Jul-20
29-Jul-20
8-Aug-20
18-Aug-20
28-Aug-20
7-Sep-20
17-Sep-20
27-Sep-20
7-Oct-20
17-Oct-20
27-Oct-20
6-Nov-20
16-Nov-20
26-Nov-20
6-Dec-20
16-Dec-20
26-Dec-20
Tarikh / Date
Rajah 1.1(c) : Tren Kepekatan Maksimum Harian Ozon (O₃) 1 Jam, Lembah Klang, 2020
Figure 1.1(c) : Trend of Daily Maximum 1-hour Concentration of Ozone (O₃), Klang Valley 2020
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
14
BAB 1
Kuantan, Pahang
KUALITI UDARA
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 15
0.18
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi O3 (IT-2) = 0.1 ppm Klang
0.16 Petaling Jaya
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guidelines for O3 (IT-2) = 0.1 ppm
0.14 Shah Alam
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.12
0
1-Jan-20
11-Jan-20
21-Jan-20
31-Jan-20
10-Feb-20
20-Feb-20
1-Mac-20
11-Mac-20
21-Mac-20
31-Mac-20
10-Apr-20
20-Apr-20
30-Apr-20
10-May-20
20-May-20
30-May-20
9-Jun-20
19-Jun-20
29-Jun-20
9-Jul-20
19-Jul-20
29-Jul-20
8-Aug-20
18-Aug-20
28-Aug-20
7-Sep-20
17-Sep-20
27-Sep-20
7-Oct-20
17-Oct-20
27-Oct-20
6-Nov-20
16-Nov-20
26-Nov-20
6-Dec-20
16-Dec-20
26-Dec-20
Tarikh / Date
Rajah 1.1(d) : Tren Kepekatan Maksimum Harian Ozon (O₃) 1 Jam, Lembah Klang, 2020
Figure 1.1(d) : Trend of Daily Maximum 1-hour Concentration of Ozone (O₃), Klang Valley 2020
0.18
0.16 Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi O3 (IT-2) = 0.1 ppm Port Dickson
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guidelines for O3 (IT-2) = 0.1 ppm Sungai Petani
Tanjung Malim
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
1-Jan-20
11-Jan-20
21-Jan-20
31-Jan-20
10-Feb-20
20-Feb-20
1-Mac-20
11-Mac-20
21-Mac-20
31-Mac-20
10-Apr-20
20-Apr-20
30-Apr-20
10-May-20
20-May-20
30-May-20
9-Jun-20
19-Jun-20
29-Jun-20
9-Jul-20
19-Jul-20
29-Jul-20
8-Aug-20
18-Aug-20
28-Aug-20
7-Sep-20
17-Sep-20
27-Sep-20
7-Oct-20
17-Oct-20
27-Oct-20
6-Nov-20
16-Nov-20
26-Nov-20
6-Dec-20
16-Dec-20
26-Dec-20
Tarikh / Date
Rajah 1.1(e) : Tren Kepekatan Maksimum Harian Ozon (O₃) 1 Jam, 2020
Figure 1.1(e) : Trend of Daily Maximum 1-hour Concentration of Ozone (O₃) 2020
16 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
STATUS KUALITI UDARA DI PANTAI BARAT AIR QUALITY STATUS IN THE WEST COAST
Pada tahun 2020, status kualiti udara di semua stesen In 2020, the air quality status at all stations in Klang Valley
di Lembah Klang menunjukkan kebanyakan bacaan showed that most readings were at good and moderate
adalah tahap baik dan sederhana. Status kualiti udara levels. The overall air quality status in Klang Valley is
di Lembah Klang secara keseluruhannya ditunjukkan shown in Figure 1.2. Several stations recorded a few
seperti di Rajah 1.2. Beberapa stesen mencatatkan days of an ’unhealthy’ API reading; especially those areas
bacaan IPU yang tidak sihat terutama di kawasan yang with high density of traffic which were Putrajaya (4 days),
mempunyai kepadatan trafik yang tinggi iaitu Putrajaya Cheras (3 days), Petaling Jaya (2 days) and Shah Alam
(4 hari), Cheras (3 hari), Petaling Jaya (2 hari) dan Shah (1 day). This was due to a high concentration of O3 as a
Alam (1 hari). Ini adalah disebabkan paras kepekatan O3 result of heavy traffic.
yang tinggi berpunca dari trafik.
Kepekatan PM2.5 tidak mempengaruhi bacaan IPU yang The PM2.5 concentration did not influence the API readings
tinggi di Lembah Klang sepanjang tahun 2020. Keadaan ini in the Klang Valley in 2020. These resulted in stations
juga telah menyebabkan semua stesen di Lembah Klang in Klang Valley recording lower numbers of unhealthy
mencatatkan bilangan hari yang tidak sihat yang lebih days in 2020 compared to 2019 as depicted in
rendah pada tahun 2020 jika dibandingkan dengan tahun Figure 1.2(a).
2019 seperti yang ditunjukkan di dalam Rajah 1.2(a).
365
352 347
341
350 330 328 325
298
300
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
250
200
150
100
68
50 32 38 38
25 16
4 12 3
2 1 1
0
Putrajaya
Batu Muda
Banting
Petaling Jaya
Cheras
Kelang
Shah Alam
Kuala Selangor
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
100
90
80
70
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Banting 0 5 5 20 41 45 27 7 5 19 0
Shah Alam 32 22 11 15 33 43 29 1 10 45 1
Cheras 59 48 37 30 34 52 33 9 10 32 3
Klang 6 6 13 11 34 28 11 3 8 16 0
Petaling Jaya 3 3 4 8 19 27 12 3 1 16 2
Kuala Selangor 0 0 5 2 16 20 0 0 2 13 0
Putrajaya 8 3 2 9 31 41 14 2 7 25 4
Batu Muda 17 15 25 21 43 51 29 3 1 17 0
Kuala Lumpur
18 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
Secara keseluruhan, status kualiti udara di utara Pantai The overall air quality status of the northern region of
Barat Semenanjung Malaysia yang meliputi Perlis, Kedah, the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia covering Perlis,
Pulau Pinang dan Perak adalah pada tahap baik dan Kedah, Pulau Pinang and Perak, was mostly at good and
sederhana sepanjang masa. Tanjung Malim mencatatkan moderate levels. Tanjung Malim recorded an impressive
bacaan IPU baik yang lebih tinggi (308 hari) berbanding 308 days of good API readings compared with the other
stesen-stesen yang lain. Hanya dua (2) stesen yang stations. Only two (2) stations recorded unhealthy API
mencatatkan bacaan IPU tidak sihat sepanjang tahun readings during 2020, namely Balik Pulau (2 days) and
2020 iaitu Balik Pulau (2 hari) dan Tanjung Malim (1 hari) Tanjung Malim (1 day) due to the high concentration of
yang disebabkan oleh kepekatan gas pencemar O3 yang O3 pollutant gas in the air.
tinggi di udara.
Rajah 1.3 menunjukkan status kualiti udara keseluruhan Figure 1.3 shows the overall air quality status for
bagi wilayah utara di Pantai Barat Semenanjung the northern region of the West Coast of Peninsular
Malaysia. Malaysia.
330
350 318
307 308
297
281 289
300 277
238 238
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
228
250
210
191
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
200 175
156
138
150 128 128
83 89
100 77 69
59 57
48
36
50
2
1
0
Langkawi
Sungai Petani
Kulim
Seberang Jaya
Balik Pulau
Perai
Taiping
Tasek
Ipoh
Manjung
Tanjung Malim
Kangar
Alor Setar
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
Rajah 1.3 : Status Kualiti Udara, Wilayah Utara Pantai Barat Semenanjung Malaysia, 2020
Figure 1.3 : Air Quality Status, Northern Region of The West Coast Peninsular Malaysia, 2020
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 19
Kualiti udara di Wilayah Selatan Pantai Barat Semenanjung In the southern region of the West Coast of Peninsular
Malaysia (N. Sembilan, Melaka dan Johor) adalah tahap Malaysia (N. Sembilan, Melaka and Johor) the API was at
IPU baik dan sederhana pada kebanyakan masa. good and moderate levels most of the time. Kota Tinggi
Kota Tinggi mencatatkan bilangan hari bacaan IPU baik recorded the highest good API readings in the southern
yang tertinggi di wilayah selatan iaitu 293 hari. Hanya dua (2) region with 293 days. Only two (2) stations recorded
stesen yang mencatatkan bacaan IPU yang tidak sihat unhealthy API readings namely Port Dickson (2 days) and
iaitu Port Dickson (2 hari) dan Melaka (1 hari). Keadaan Melaka (1 day). This situation was due to ground level
ini disebabkan pencemaran ozon aras bumi daripada ozone and could have been because of an increase in
peningkatan trafik sebelum dan selepas PKP di kawasan- traffic before and after MCO in these areas.
kawasan tersebut.
Rajah 1.4 menunjukkan status kualiti udara secara Figure 1.4 shows the overall air quality status for
keseluruhan bagi wilayah selatan di Pantai Barat the southern region of the West Coast of Peninsular
Semenanjung Malaysia. Malaysia.
341
350 319
293
300 285
261 277 274
256 259
234 244 239
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
250 229
191
200 175
Seremban
Port Dickson
Bukit Rambai
Melaka
Alor Gajah
Pasir Gudang
Larkin
Kota Tinggi
Segamat
Batu Pahat
Kluang
Pengerang
Tangkak
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
Rajah 1.4 : Status Kualiti Udara, Wilayah Selatan Pantai Barat Semenanjung Malaysia, 2020
Figure 1.4 : Air Quality Status, Southern Region of The West Coast Peninsular Malaysia, 2020
20 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
STATUS KUALITI UDARA DI PANTAI TIMUR AIR QUALITY STATUS IN THE EAST COAST
Kualiti udara di Pantai Timur Semenanjung Malaysia (Pahang, In the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia (Pahang,
Terengganu, Kelantan dan timur Johor) bagi tahun 2020 Terengganu, Kelantan and East Johor) the air quality
berstatus baik dan sederhana pada kebanyakan masa. Paka remained at good and moderate levels most of the
mencatatkan bilangan hari bacaan IPU tertinggi di Pantai time. Paka recorded the highest good API reading in
Timur iaitu 281 hari. Hanya tiga (3) stesen mencatatkan east coast region for 281 days. Only three (3) stations
status kualiti udara tidak sihat sepanjang tahun iaitu recorded unhealthy air quality status throughout the
Balok Baru (9 hari), Rompin (4 hari) dan Temerloh (2 year, namely Balok Baru (9 days), Rompin (4 days) and
hari) yang disebabkan oleh peningkatan kepekatan PM2.5 Temerloh (2 days) due to the increase in PM2.5
akibat pembakaran terbuka di kawasan setempat. concentration as a result of open burnings. However,
Walau bagaimanapun, stesen Balok Baru mencatatkan Balok Baru station recorded very unhealthy readings
bacaan sangat tidak sihat selama satu (1) hari yang for one (1) day due to high SO2 released into the air
disebabkan oleh kesan pelepasan gas SO2 yang tinggi dari from a premise in Gebeng Industrial Area, Kuantan and
sebuah premis di Kawasan Perindustrian Gebeng dan arah downwind movement towards the air quality station.
angin telah menghala ke stesen Balok Baru. Premis berkenaan The premise was investigated and enforcement action
telah disiasat dan diambil tindakan perundangan oleh JAS. was taken by DOE.
Status kualiti udara di Pantai Timur Semenanjung The overall air quality status in the East Coast of
Malaysia secara keseluruhan adalah seperti di Rajah 1.5. Peninsular Malaysia is shown in Figure 1.5.
350
250 229
219 225
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
211
194 191
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
200
175
162
147 155
150 137 137
102
92
100 79 79 85
50
4 9
2 1
0
Jerantut
Rompin
Temerloh
Indera Mahkota
Balok Baru
Kota Bahru
Tanah Merah
Kuala Terengganu
Paka
Kemaman
Besut
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
Rajah 1.5 : Status Kualiti Udara, Pantai Timur Semenanjung Malaysia, 2020
Figure 1.5 : Air Quality Status, East Coast Peninsular Malaysia, 2020
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 21
STATUS KUALITI UDARA DI SABAH, LABUAN AIR QUALITY STATUS IN SABAH, LABUAN
DAN SARAWAK AND SARAWAK
Kualiti udara di Sabah, Labuan dan Sarawak adalah The air quality in Sabah, Labuan and Sarawak remained
pada tahap baik dan sederhana di kebanyakan masa. between good to moderate levels most of the time.
Stesen Kapit merekodkan bacaan IPU baik yang paling Kapit recorded good API reading in Sarawak and
tinggi di Sarawak iaitu 359 hari manakala stesen Tawau maintained that for 359 days while Tawau recorded good
merekodkan bacaan IPU baik yang tertinggi di Sabah API reading in Sabah for 358 days. No station in Sarawak,
iaitu 358 hari. Tiada stesen di Sarawak, Sabah dan Labuan Sabah and Labuan recorded unhealthy days in 2020
mencatatkan bacaan tidak sihat bagi tahun 2020 kecuali except in ILP Miri, which recorded API unhealthy readings
ILP Miri mencatatkan bacaan IPU tidak sihat selama dua (2) for two (2) days due to local bush and forest fires.
hari disebabkan oleh kebakaran di kawasan belukar dan
hutan setempat.
The overall air quality status in Sarawak is shown in
Status kualiti udara di Sarawak secara keseluruhan Figure 1.6 and Figure 1.7 shows the overall air quality
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.6 dan di Sabah dan Labuan in Sabah and Labuan.
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.7.
400
359
344
334 328 332
350 320
291
300 278
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
251
250 223
208
204
46 38 34
50 31
22
7 2
0
Miri
Samarahan
Sri Aman
Sarikei
Sibu
Kapit
Limbang
Bintulu
Kuching
Mukah
Samalaju
ILP Miri
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
358
350
296 292
300 270
Bilangan Hari / Number of Days
229
250
179 186
200
137
150
96
100 70 74
50 7
0
Tawau
Keningau
Kota Kinabalu
Kimanis
Sandakan
Labuan
Baik / Good (0 - 50) Sederhana / Moderate (51 - 100) Tidak Sihat / Unhealthy (101 - 200)
Sangat Tidak Sihat / Very Unhealthy (201 - 300) Berbahaya / Hazardous (> 300)
Ranau, Sabah
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 23
Enam (6) pencemar udara iaitu habuk halus bersaiz 10 Six (6) air pollutants, namely particulate matter (PM10),
mikron (PM10), habuk halus bersaiz 2.5 mikron (PM2.5), particulate matter (PM2.5), ground level ozone (O3),
ozon permukaan bumi (O3), sulfur dioksida (SO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and
nitrogen dioksida (NO2) dan karbon monoksida (CO) carbon monoxide (CO) are monitored continuously at 65
dipantau secara berterusan di 65 buah lokasi. Parameter locations. The parameter of PM2.5 is being fully monitored
PM2.5 mula dipantau sepenuhnya pada tahun 2018. Tren since 2018. The air quality trend for the period 2010
kualiti udara dari tahun 2010 hingga 2020 ditentukan to 2020 was calculated by averaging annual air quality
dengan mengambilkira purata data kualiti udara tahunan data received from the monitoring sites and with
daripada stesen-stesen pengawasan dan merujuk reference to Malaysia Ambient Air Quality Standard
kepada Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia seperti as shown in Table 1.2. For 2020, Malaysia Ambient Air
yang ditunjukkan dalam Jadual 1.2. Bagi tahun 2020, Quality Standard IT-2 is used.
Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia IT-2 digunakan.
1 Tahun µg/m3 50 50 45 40
PM10
24 Jam µg/m3 150 150 120 100
1 Tahun µg/m3 – 35 25 15
PM2.5
Pada tahun 2020, nilai purata tahunan PM10 dalam udara In 2020, the annual average value of PM10 in the ambient
ambien adalah 20 μg/m iaitu masih belum melebihi 3
air was 20 µg/m3 which is lower than the Malaysian
had yang ditetapkan dalam Standard Kualiti Udara Ambient Air Quality Standard IT-2 Guideline value, shown
Ambien Malaysia bagi IT-2 iaitu sebanyak 45 μg/m 3
in Figure 1.8, of 45 µg/m3. The PM10 reading for 2020 was
seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.8. Bacaan PM10 the lowest ever recorded in the period 2010 to 2020.
bagi tahun 2020 adalah paling rendah yang pernah The MCO imposed by the Government that restrained
dicatatkan di dalam tempoh 2010 hingga 2020. PKP industrial, commercial and social activities successfully
yang telah dikenakan oleh Kerajaan menghadkan aktiviti reduced air pollution particularly the concentration of
industri, komersial dan sosial orang awam telah berjaya fine particles PM2.5 in the air.
mengurangkan pencemaran udara dalam negara
terutamanya kepekatan habuk halus PM2.5 di udara.
Tren purata tahunan kepekatan PM10 dalam udara ambien The trend of the annual average levels of PM10
bagi tahun 2010 hingga tahun 2020 adalah seperti concentration in the ambient air from 2010 to 2020 is
yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.8. Berdasarkan kategori shown in Figure 1.8. With regard to the annual average
guna tanah, kawasan bandar merekodkan bacaan based on land use, urban areas recorded higher PM10
PM10 yang lebih tinggi berbanding kawasan yang lain. readings than other areas. It must be noted though that
Walaubagaimanapun, nilai kepekatan PM10 pada tahun the PM10 concentration value in 2020 is in compliance
2020 adalah mematuhi Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien with the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Standard IT-2
Malaysia IT-2 seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.8 (a). Guideline as shown in Figure 1.8(a).
70
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi PM10 (IT-2) = 45 µg/m³
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for PM10 (IT-2) = 45 µg/m³
60
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
50
40
30
20
10
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
100
90
80
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi PM10 (IT-2) = 45 µg/m³
70 Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for PM10 (IT-2) = 45 µg/m³
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 44 48 49 48 49 58 44 33 23 26 18
Bandar / Urban 42 45 46 48 46 57 44 35 28 32 22
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 36 41 39 40 41 49 39 31 26 29 21
Latarbelakang / Background 34 36 34 34 33 49 29 25 21 22 17
Pendalaman / Rural 30 34 39 35 36 43 32 25 22 28 17
Rajah 1.8(a) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Habuk Halus (PM10) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2010 - 2020
Figure 1.8(a) : Annual Average Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM10) by Land Use, 2010 - 2020
PM2.5 mula diukur dan dianalisis bermula pada PM2.5 started being measured and analysed since 2017
pertengahan tahun 2017 dan dilaporkan pada tahun and reported in 2018. The annual average value of PM2.5 in
2018. Nilai purata tahunan PM2.5 dalam udara ambien the ambient air for the year 2020 was 12 µg/m3 which was
bagi tahun 2020 adalah 12 μg/m3 dan masih belum lower than the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Standard
melebihi had yang ditetapkan dalam Standard Kualiti IT-2 Guideline value of 25 µg/m3. PM2.5 concentration in
Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi IT-2 iaitu sebanyak 25 μg/ the year 2020 was much lower compared to that in 2019
m . Bacaan PM2.5 bagi tahun 2020 adalah lebih rendah
3
due to humid weather conditions, a reduction of forest
berbanding dengan tahun 2019 disebabkan oleh and bush fire cases in the country and the absence of
keadaan cuaca yang lebih lembab, pengurangan kes-kes transboundary haze incidents in 2020.
kebakaran hutan dan belukar di dalam negara dan tiada
kejadian jerebu merentas sempadan yang direkodkan di
dalam tahun 2020.
26 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
Berdasarkan kategori guna tanah, nilai kepekatan PM2.5 On the basis of land use categories, PM2.5 concentrations
pada tahun 2020 adalah mematuhi Standard Kualiti in 2019 was in compliance with Malaysian Ambient
Udara Ambien Malaysia IT-2 seperti yang ditunjukkan Air Quality Standard IT-2 as shown in Figure 1.8(b).
dalam Rajah 1.8 (b). Daripada rajah tersebut, kepekatan From the figure, the highest concentration of PM2.5
PM2.5 tertinggi mengikut guna tanah adalah di kawasan according to land use was urban areas followed by
bandar dan diikuti dengan kawasan pinggir bandar. suburban areas.
35
30
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia Bagi PM2.5 (IT-2) = 25 µg/m³
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
20
15
10
0
2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Rajah 1.8 (b) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Habuk Halus (PM2.5), 2018-2020
Figure 1.8 (b) : Annual Average Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM2.5), 2018-2020
50
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
45
40
Kepekatan (µg/m³) / Concentration (µg/m³)
35
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia Bagi PM2.5 (IT-2) = 25 µg/m³
30
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline For PM2.5 (IT-2) = 25 µg/m³
25
20
15
10
0
2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 14 17 10
Bandar / Urban 19 23 14
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 17 21 13
Latarbelakang / Background 12 14 9
Pendalaman / Rural 14 19 10
Rajah 1.8(c) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Habuk Halus (PM2.5) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2018-2020
Figure 1.8(c) : Annual Average Concentration of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) by Land Use, 2018- 2020
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 27
Kuala Lumpur
Pada tahun 2020, purata tahunan kepekatan maksimum In 2020, the annual average daily maximum ozone
harian ozon didapati sedikit menurun berbanding concentrations slightly decreased compared to the year
dengan tahun 2019 dengan bacaan 0.0287 ppm. Secara 2019 with a reading of 0.0287 ppm. Overall, it must
keseluruhannya, tren purata tahunan kepekatan maksimum be noted that the trend for the annual average maximum
ozon tempoh lapan jam dalam udara ambien dari tahun eight-hour ozone concentrations in ambient air from
2010 hingga 2020 adalah mematuhi had sebanyak 0.06 2010 to 2020 were well below the limit of 0.06 ppm as
ppm seperti yang ditetapkan dalam Standard Kualiti Udara stipulated in the Malaysian Ambient Quality Standard
Ambien Malaysia IT-2 dan tren tersebut adalah seperti yang IT-2 as shown in Figure 1.9.
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 1.9.
0.1200
0.0800
Kepekatan(ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi O3 (IT-2) = 0.06 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for O3 (IT-2) = 0.06 ppm
0.0600
0.0400
0.0200
0.0000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Rajah 1.9(a) menunjukkan kepekatan ozon aras bumi Figure 1.9(a) shows the ground level ozone concentration
untuk pelbagai kategori guna tanah dari tahun 2010 for various land use categories between 2010 and 2020.
hingga 2020. Bermula tahun 2018, tiada pemantauan Starting from 2018, there was no monitoring of ground
pencemar ozon aras bumi dilakukan di kawasan industri level ozone in industrial areas as the priority was given
kerana untuk memberi keutamaan pemantauan ozon to the urban area monitoring. Urban areas recorded
di kawasan bandar. Kawasan bandar mencatatkan higher level of ground level ozone due to higher traffic
bacaan ozon lebih tinggi disebabkan oleh jumlah trafik volume and conducive atmospheric conditions resulting
yang lebih tinggi dan keadaan atmosfera yang kondusif in ozone formation. Ground level ozone pollution was
menyebabkan pembentukan ozon. Pencemaran ozon also dominant in some suburban and rural areas due to
aras bumi juga ketara di beberapa kawasan pinggir downwind movement of ground level ozone pollutant
bandar dan pedalaman disebabkan oleh pergerakan precursors namely nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile
angin yang membawa pencetus pencemar ozon aras organic compounds (VOCs) emitted mainly from motor
bumi iaitu oksida-oksida nitrogen (NOx) dan sebatian vehicles and industries.
organik meruap (VOC) yang kebanyakannya dilepaskan
daripada kenderaan bermotor dan industri.
0.14
0.12
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.10
0.08
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi O3 (IT-2) = 0.06 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for O3 (IT-2) = 0.06 ppm
0.06
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
0.04
0.02
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 0.0412 0.0402 0.0407 0.0417 0.0431 0.0463 0.0270 0.0254 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Bandar / Urban 0.0453 0.0447 0.0441 0.0457 0.0469 0.0489 0.0300 0.0309 0.0353 0.0367 0.0325
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 0.0364 0.0383 0.0386 0.0370 0.0388 0.0354 0.0230 0.0254 0.0316 0.0330 0.0278
Latarbelakang / Background 0.0287 0.0309 0.0327 0.0335 0.0378 0.0416 0.0270 0.0193 0.0197 0.0212 0.0175
Rajah 1.9(a) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Ozon (O3) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2010-2020
Figure 1.9(a) : Annual Average Concentration of Ozone (O3) by Land Use, 2010-2020
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 29
Purata kepekatan tahunan SO2 yang direkodkan pada The average annual concentration of SO2 recorded in
tahun 2020 adalah sama seperti tahun 2019 iaitu 0.0011 2020 is the same as in 2019 which is 0.0011 ppm.
ppm. Secara umumnya, purata kepekatan tahunan Generally, the annual average SO2 concentration shows
SO2 menunjukkan tren penurunan dari tahun 2010 a declining trend between 2010 and 2020 (Figure 1.10)
hingga 2020 (Rajah 1.10) dan ia adalah jauh di bawah and it is well below the limit of 0.035 ppm stipulated
had sebanyak 0.035 ppm seperti yang ditetapkan in the Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Standard IT-2.
dalam Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia IT-2. Ini The reason could be the use of better fuel quality
kemungkinan disebabkan oleh penggunaan bahan api of EURO2M diesel in this country, which began in
berkualiti EURO2M diesel yang lebih baik di negara ini September 2009 and EURO5 Diesel with less sulphur
bermula dari bulan September 2009 dan penggunaan content than 10 mg/l that had been introduced
EURO5 Diesel yang mengandungi kandungan sulfur in the market in November 2015. More stringent
kurang dari 10 mg/l yang telah diperkenalkan di Environmental Regulations (Clean Air) 2014, use of
pasaran sejak November 2015. Standard pelepasan SO2 natural gas for industrial combustion process and
yang lebih ketat dalam Peraturan-Peraturan Kualiti Alam vehicles and use of electric vehicles could also have
Sekeliling (Udara Bersih) 2014, penggunaan gas asli secara contributed to the declining trend of SO2 in urban and
meluas dalam proses industri dan kegunaan kenderaan industrial areas.
serta kenderaan elektrik turut menyumbang kepada tren
penurunan pelepasan SO2 di kawasan industri dan bandar.
0.04
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi SO2 (IT-2) = 0.035 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for SO2 (IT-2) = 0.035 ppm
0.03
Kepekatan(ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.01
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Rajah 1.10 (a) menunjukkan kepekatan purata tahunan Figure 1.10(a) shows the annual average concentrations
bagi sulfur dioksida mengikut kategori guna tanah. of sulphur dioxide from different categories of land use.
Berdasarkan kepada rajah tersebut, keadaan menunjukkan Readings show that the concentration of SO2 in industrial
bahawa kepekatan SO2 di kawasan-kawasan industri and background areas in 2020 was slightly higher than
dan latarbelakang pada tahun 2020 adalah lebih tinggi in 2019. It is evident that the number of vehicles on the
sedikit berbanding dengan tahun 2019. Ini menunjukkan road did not affect the increase of SO2 gas in the air.
bilangan kenderaan di jalan raya tidak memberi kesan The slight increase SO2 in 2020 could be due to power
kepada peningkatan gas SO2 di udara. Sedikit peningkatan plants being operated at optimum level during MCO.
SO2 pada tahun 2020 berkemungkinan disebabkan loji
janakuasa beroperasi secara optimum ketika PKP.
0.01
0.04 Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi SO2 (IT-2) = 0.035 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for SO2 (IT-2) = 0.035 ppm
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0022 0.0026 0.0024 0.0028 0.0019 0.0009 0.0010 0.0011
Bandar /Urban 0.0019 0.0020 0.0018 0.0020 0.0020 0.0018 0.0023 0.0013 0.0012 0.0012 0.0012
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 0.0012 0.0014 0.0015 0.0013 0.0015 0.0017 0.0013 0.0019 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010
Latarbelakang / Background 0.0014 0.0007 0.0009 0.0005 0.0006 0.0009 0.0010 0.0010 0.0009 0.0010 0.0012
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Rajah 1.10(a) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Sulfur Dioksida (SO2) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2010-2020
Figure 1.10(a) Malaysia : Annual Average Concentration of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) by Land Use, 2010-2020
Pada tahun 2020, kepekatan NO2 adalah lebih rendah In 2020, NO2 concentration was lower than in 2019 with
berbanding dengan tahun 2019 iaitu dengan bacaan a reading of 0.0057 ppm. This situation could be due to
0.0057 ppm. Keadaan ini adalah disebabkan oleh the declining number of vehicles on the road following
bilangan kenderaan yang berkurangan di jalan raya the MCO directive issued by the Government on 18
ekoran arahan PKP yang dikeluarkan oleh Kerajaan March 2020 to prevent the spread of Covid-19. However,
bermula 18 Mac 2020 disebabkan pandemik Covid-19. the NO2 concentration remained high in urban areas. An
Walau bagaimanapun, kepekatan NO2 kekal tinggi estimation of NO2 emission load indicated that 66 percent
di kawasan bandar. Anggaran beban pelepasan NO2 were from powerplants while 25 percent were from
menunjukkan sebanyak 66 peratus adalah daripada loji motor vehicles, 7 percent from industries and 2 percent
janakuasa, 25 peratus daripada pelepasan kenderaan from other sources. The annual average concentration
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 31
bermotor, 7 peratus daripada industri dan 2 peratus of NO2 in the ambient air from 2010 to 2016 remained
daripada lain-lain sumber. Kepekatan purata tahunan NO2 almost constant and starts a declining trend after 2016
dalam udara ambien dari tahun 2010 hingga 2016 adalah and continues until 2020 well below the Malaysia
hampir konstan dan menunjukkan tren penurunan Ambient Air Quality Standard IT-2. (Figure 1.11 and
sejak 2016 hingga 2020 serta jauh berada di bawah had Figure 1.11(a))
yang ditetapkan dalam Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien
Malaysia IT-2. (Rajah 1.11 dan Rajah 1.11(a))
0.02
0.18 Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi NO2 (IT-2) = 0.16 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for NO2 (IT-2) = 0.16 ppm
0.16
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
0.20
0.18 Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia Bagi NO2 (IT-2) = 0.16 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline For NO2 (IT-2) = 0.16 ppm
0.16
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 0.0105 0.0104 0.0109 0.0109 0.0110 0.0115 0.0100 0.0058 0.0037 0.0038 0.0033
Bandar / Urban 0.0098 0.0105 0.0101 0.0103 0.0107 0.0101 0.0110 0.0100 0.0110 0.0105 0.0081
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 0.0073 0.0081 0.0083 0.0077 0.0073 0.0088 0.0066 0.0075 0.0073 0.0069 0.0056
Latarbelakang / Background 0.0019 0.0021 0.0022 0.0023 0.0021 0.0025 0.0030 0.0031 0.0028 0.0032 0.0025
Rajah 1.11(a) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Nitrogen Dioksida (NO2) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2010-2020
Figure 1.11(a) : Annual Average Concentration of Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) by Land Use, 2010-2020
32 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
Kepekatan CO pada tahun 2020 menunjukkan penurunan There was a slight decrease in CO levels in 2020 compared
berbanding tahun 2019 iaitu dengan bacaan 0.5451 to 2019 with a reading of 0.5451 ppm. The levels
ppm. Tahap kepekatan yang dicatatkan juga mematuhi recorded were well in compliance with the Malaysian
Standard Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia IT-2 (Rajah 1.12). Ambient Air Quality Standard IT-2 (Figure 1.12). Apart
Selain daripada pengurangan bilangan kenderaan di jalan from the reduction in the number of vehicles on the
raya, pengurangan bilangan kejadian kebakaran hutan road, the reduction in the number of forest and bush fire
dan belukar di dalam negara juga turut menyumbang incidents in the country also contributed to the decrease
kepada penurunan kepekatan CO. Kepekatan CO yang in CO concentration in the air for 2020. A significant
signifikan adalah disebabkan oleh pelepasan dari contribution to concentration of CO would be the motor
ekzos kenderaan motor yang menyumbang sebanyak vehicle exhaust emissions that contributed to 95 percent
95 peratus daripada beban pelepasan CO pada tahun of the CO emission load in 2020. Figure 1.12(a) shows
2020. Rajah 1.12(a) menunjukkan kepekatan CO untuk CO concentrations for various categories of land use.
pelbagai kategori guna tanah.
10.0
Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia bagi CO (IT-2) = 9 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline for CO (IT-2) = 9 ppm
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
10.0 Garis Panduan Kualiti Udara Ambien Malaysia Bagi CO (IT-2) = 9 ppm
Malaysian Ambient Air Quality Guideline For CO (IT-2) = 9 ppm
9.0
8.0
Kepekatan (ppm) / Concentration (ppm)
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Industri / Industrial 0.7439 0.7662 0.7576 0.7670 0.8116 0.7050 0.5527 0.6303 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Bandar / Urban 0.6933 0.7221 0.7004 0.7418 0.7923 0.6219 0.5784 0.6745 0.7247 0.7126 0.5831
Pinggir Bandar / Suburban 0.6541 0.6146 0.6447 0.6012 0.6258 0.5840 0.5637 0.5889 0.6329 0.6250 0.5304
Latarbelakang / Background 0.3357 0.3123 0.2932 0.2899 0.2886 0.3357 0.2680 0.4340 0.6170 0.6476 0.6265
Rajah 1.12(a) : Purata Kepekatan Tahunan Karbon Monoksida (CO) mengikut Guna Tanah, 2010-2020
Figure 1.12(a) : Annual Average Concentration of Carbon Monoxide (CO) by Land Use, 2010-2020
STATUS KUALITI UDARA SEBELUM DAN SEPANJANG AIR QUALITY STATUS BEFORE AND DURING THE
TEMPOH PERINTAH KAWALAN PERGERAKAN (PKP) MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER (MCO) PERIOD
Pihak Kerajaan telah mengeluarkan arahan Perintah The Government imposed the Movement Control Order
JAS telah membuat pemantauan dan analisis DOE conducted comparative monitoring and analysis
perbandingan terhadap IPU dan juga gas-gas pencemar of the API as well as other air pollutants during MCO,
udara yang lain semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPP dan CMCO and RMCO and compared with the situation
dibandingkan dengan keadaan sebelum arahan PKP before the MCO directive was issued from 1 March 2020
dikeluarkan iaitu dari 1 Mac 2020 hingga 17 Mac 2020. to 17 March 2020.
Rajah 1.13 menunjukkan ringkasan peratus perbezaan Figure 1.13 shows a summary of the percentage
perbandingan bagi IPU bilangan hari baik di seluruh difference in comparison for the number of good API
negara sebelum PKP, semasa PKP dan PKPB serta PKPP. days throughout the nation before MCO, during MCO and
Bilangan bacaan IPU baik merekodkan peratus bacaan during CMCO and RMCO periods. The number of ‘good’
yang lebih tinggi semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPP berbanding API readings recorded a higher percentage during MCO,
sebelum PKP iaitu masing-masing dengan peratus CMCO and RMCO compared to before MCO - an increase
peningkatan IPU baik sebanyak 37%, 53% dan 20%. of good API days by 37%, 53% and 20% respectively.
60
Perbezaan (%) / Differences (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0
PKP / MCO PKPB / CMCO PKPP / RMCO
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Rajah 1.13 : Perbezaan Peratus IPU Bilangan Hari Baik Semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPP
Figure 1.13 : Percentage Differences of API in the Number of Good Days During MCO, CMCO and RMCO
STATUS KUALITI UDARA SEBELUM DAN SEPANJANG AIR QUALITY STATUS BEFORE AND DURING THE
TEMPOH PERINTAH KAWALAN PERGERAKAN DI PERIOD OF MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER IN
LEMBAH KLANG KLANG VALLEY
Analisis terperinci telah dijalankan ke atas beberapa Detailed analyses were conducted on several key
parameter utama iaitu habuk halus bersaiz diameter 2.5 parameters namely particulate matter of 2.5 microns in
mikron (PM2.5 ), sulfur dioksida (SO2), nitrogen dioksida diameter size (PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide
(NO2 ), karbon monoksida (CO) dan ozon (O3) di beberapa (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone (O3) at several air
stesen pengawasan kualiti udara di Lembah Klang iaitu quality monitoring stations in the Klang Valley, namely in
di Batu Muda, Cheras, Putrajaya, Petaling Jaya, Shah Alam, Batu Muda, Cheras, Putrajaya, Petaling Jaya, Shah Alam,
Klang dan Banting bagi tempoh PKP, PKPB dan PKPP dan Klang and Banting during MCO, CMCO and RMCO periods
dibandingkan dengan tempoh sebelum PKP. and were compared to levels before the MCO period.
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 35
NO2 menunjukkan peratus penurunan kepekatan NO2 showed the highest decline during MCO of 52%
yang tertinggi semasa PKP iaitu 52% dan diikuti oleh followed by CO at 25%, SO2 at 18% and PM2.5 at 14%.
CO 25%, SO2 18% dan PM2.5 14%. Hanya O3 yang Only O3 showed an increase during MCO of 11% due to
menunjukkan peningkatan semasa PKP iaitu sebanyak the nitration process between NO and O3. A decrease
11% yang disebabkan oleh proses penitratan di antara in concentration levels of NO2, indirectly increases the
NO dan O3. Penurunan kepekatan NO2 secara tidak concentration of ozone gas in the atmosphere. However,
langsung meningkatkan kepekatan ozon di atmosfera. NO2 and SO2 showed an increase when RMCO directives
Walaubagaimanapun, NO2 dan SO2 menunjukkan were issued in which restrictions on the operating
peningkatan apabila arahan PKPP dikeluarkan di mana industries were lifted and the number of vehicles on the
sekatan untuk industri beroperasi dilonggarkan dan road increased while PM2.5 concentrations still showed
bilangan kenderaan di jalan raya semakin bertambah a decrease during MCO, CMCO and RMCO. The trend of
manakala kepekatan PM2.5 masih menunjukkan peratus change in percentage of each pollutant concentration is
penurunan semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPB. Tren perubahan shown in Figure 1.14.
peratus setiap kepekatan pencemar ditunjukkan di
dalam Rajah 1.14.
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
30
20
Perbezaan (%) / Differences (%)
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Rajah 1.14 : Perbezaan Peratus Pencemar Udara Semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPP di Lembah Klang
Figure 1.14 : Percentage Differences of Air Pollutants During MCO, CMCO and RMCO in Klang Valley
STATUS KUALITI UDARA SEBELUM DAN SEPANJANG AIR QUALITY STATUS BEFORE AND DURING
TEMPOH PERINTAH KAWALAN PERGERAKAN DI THE PERIOD OF MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER IN
BANDAR UTAMA IN MALAYSIA MAIN CITIES OF MALAYSIA
Analisis kualiti udara turut dijalankan ke atas stesen Air quality analyses were also conducted on air quality
pengawasan kualiti udara di bandar-bandar utama di monitoring stations in major cities throughout Malaysia
seluruh Malaysia seperti di Pulau Pinang, Ipoh, Shah Alam, such as Penang, Ipoh, Shah Alam, Kuantan, Seremban,
Kuantan, Seremban, Melaka, Pasir Gudang, Kuching Melaka, Pasir Gudang, Kuching and Kota Kinabalu for
dan Kota Kinabalu bagi tempoh yang sama dan tren the same period and the percentage of change for each
perubahan peratus bagi setiap kepekatan pencemar concentration of pollutant is shown in Figure 1.15.
ditunjukkan di dalam Rajah 1.15.
36 BAB 1 KUALITI UDARA
NO2 menunjukkan peratus perbezaan penurunan NO2 showed a marked decrease during MCO of 45%
kepekatan yang lebih tinggi semasa PKP iaitu 45% dan followed by SO2 with 12%, PM2.5 with 8% and CO with
diikuti oleh SO2 12%, PM2.5 8 % dan CO 7%. Hanya O3 yang 7%. Only O3 showed an increase during the MCO of 16%.
menunjukkan peningkatan semasa PKP iaitu sebanyak However, all air pollutant parameters showed an increase
16%. Walau bagaimanapun, semua parameter pencemar when the CMCO and RMCO were implemented. This was
udara menunjukkan peningkatan apabila arahan PKPB primarily due to active industrial activities, shipping
dan PKPP dilaksanakan. Keadaan ini adalah dipengaruhi activities in ports as well as the optimal operation of
oleh kegiatan industri yang berjalan secara aktif, aktiviti power stations in major cities during the CMCO and
perkapalan di pelabuhan serta pengoperasian janakuasa RMCO periods.
tenaga secara optimum di bandar-bandar utama semasa
tempoh PKPB dan PKPP.
Kesimpulannya, peningkatan bilangan kenderaan di In conclusion, the increasing number of vehicles on the
jalanraya dan juga aktiviti industri memainkan peranan road as well as industrial activities play an important
penting dalam mempengaruhi tren kualiti udara di role in influencing air quality trends in the country. This
dalam negara. Ini adalah terbukti apabila Kerajaan telah is evident when the Government lifted the MCO and
melonggarkan PKP kepada PKPB dan PKPP, terdapat moved to CMCO and RMCO conditions. There was an
peningkatan parameter pencemar udara walaupun increase in air pollutant parameters even though the
aktiviti sosial dan industri tidak sepenuhnya beroperasi. social and industrial activities were not fully operational.
Walau bagaimanapun, tahap pencemaran kualiti udara Nevertheless, the level of air quality during the MCO,
semasa tempoh PKP, PKPB dan PKPP masih lagi baik CMCO and RMCO periods remained good through to the
sehingga akhir tahun 2020 jika dibandingkan dengan end of 2020 compared to the period before the MCO was
tempoh sebelum PKP dilaksanakan. Ini juga kemungkinan implemented. This could also be attributed to the wet
dipengaruhi oleh cuaca yang basah dalam negara dalam weather in the country during that period.
tempoh tersebut.
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPP / RMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKPB / CMCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
PKP / MCO
40
30
Perbezaan (%) / Differences (%)
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Rajah 1.15 : Perbezaan Peratus Pencemar Udara Semasa PKP, PKPB dan PKPP bagi Bandar Utama di Malaysia
Figure 1.15 : Percentage Differences of Air Pollutants During MCO, CMCO and RMCO for Main Cities in Malaysia
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 37
BAB 2
CHAPTER 2
EQMP merupakan satu program inisiatif kerajaan untuk EQMP is a Government initiative to consolidate and
memantapkan pemantauan kualiti alam sekitar. Program strengthen the monitoring of environmental quality. The
ini melibatkan pengumpulan data kualiti air sungai di programme involves data collection of river water quality
seluruh Malaysia bagi tujuan untuk melaporkan tahap throughout Malaysia for the purpose of reporting the
sebenar kualiti alam sekitar Negara dalam usaha untuk actual level of environmental quality in the country in
memantau, mencegah dan mengawal pencemaran. order to effectively monitor, prevent and control pollution.
EQMP ini adalah penambahbaikan daripada sistem The EQMP is an improvement of the environmental quality
pengawasan kualiti alam sekitar yang telah digunapakai monitoring system that had been adopted by the
oleh Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS) sejak tahun 1995 Department of Environment (DOE) from 1995 to 2015 for
sehingga 2015 bagi pengawasan kualiti air sungai. river water quality monitoring.
PENGAWASAN KUALITI AIR SUNGAI MANUAL MANUAL RIVER WATER QUALITY MONITORING
JAS meneruskan program pengawasan kualiti air sungai The DOE continued the river water quality monitoring
pada tahun 2020 bagi menentukan kualiti air sungai dan programme in 2020 to determine the status of river
mengesan perubahan ke atas kualiti air sungai. Sampel- water quality and to detect changes in river water
sampel air sungai diambil daripada stesen-stesen yang quality. Water samples were collected from designated
telah ditetapkan dan diukur kualitinya secara in-situ stations for in-situ and laboratory analysis to determine
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
serta dihantar ke makmal untuk dianalisis bertujuan the physic, chemistry and biological characteristics. The
menentukan kriteria dari segi fizik-kimia dan biologi. Water Quality Index (WQI) is used to indicate the level
Indeks Kualiti Air (IKA) digunakan untuk mengukur of pollution and the corresponding suitability in terms
tahap pencemaran dan kesesuaian jenis guna air seperti of water uses according to the National Water Quality
yang digariskan oleh Standard Kualiti Air Kebangsaan Standards for Malaysia (NWQS) (ANNEX). The WQI takes
(ANNEX). IKA telah mengambilkira parameter Oksigen into consideration parameters including Dissolved
Terlarut (DO), Keperluan Oksigen Biokimia (BOD), Oxygen (DO), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD),
Keperluan Oksigen Kimia (COD), Ammoniakal Nitrogen Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Ammoniacal Nitrogen
(AN), Pepejal Terampai (SS) dan pH. Pada tahun 2020, (AN), Suspended Solids (SS) and pH-levels. In 2020, river
kualiti air sungai telah dinilai berdasarkan sejumlah water quality was assessed based on 8,098 samples taken
8,098 sampel air sungai yang telah diambil daripada from a total of 1,353 manual monitoring stations covering
sejumlah 1,353 stesen pengawasan manual yang 672 rivers in Malaysia.
merangkumi 672 sungai di Malaysia.
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 39
Sejumlah 443 (66%) sungai daripada 672 sungai yang Out of the 672 rivers monitored, 443 (66%) showed good
dipantau telah menunjukkan indeks kualiti air bersih, water quality, 195 (29%) were slightly polluted while 34
195 (29%) adalah sederhana tercemar dan 34 (5%) adalah (5%) were polluted (Figure 2.1). The monitored rivers
tercemar (Rajah 2.1). Status kualiti air bagi sungai-sungai and their overall quality status are as in Tables 2.1, Table
yang dipantau adalah seperti dalam Jadual 2.1, Jadual 2.2 and Table 2.3.
2.2 dan Jadual 2.3.
Keperluan BOD, AN, dan SS masih menjadi punca As in previous years, the BOD, AN and SS remained
kepada pencemaran sungai. BOD yang tinggi kerap significant parameters in terms of river pollution. High BOD
kali dikaitkan dengan pengolahan sisa kumbahan yang can be attributed to inadequate treatment of sewage or
tidak mencukupi, atau akibat pelepasan efluen daripada effluent from agro-based and manufacturing industries.
industri-industri pengilangan dan berasaskan pertanian. The main sources of AN may be linked to animal farming
Punca utama AN, pula boleh dikaitkan dengan aktiviti and domestic sewage, while the sources for SS were
penternakan dan kumbahan domestik manakala punca mainly due to improper earthworks and land clearing
utama SS adalah kerja-kerja tanah yang tidak teratur dan activities.
aktiviti pembukaan tanah.
100
672 672
638
90
579 577 570
80
Peratus Bilangan Sungai / Percentage Number of River
43% 43%
39%
40 38%
36% 36% 36%
35%
34% 34%
32% 31%
30 29%
20
13% 11%
10% 10%
10 8% 9% 8% 8% 8% 9%
6% 7%
5%
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Baik / Good Sederhana Tercemar / Slightly Polluted Tercemar / Polluted Jumlah Sungai / Total Number of River
Nota / Note :
B/C : Bersih / Clean
ST/SP : Sederhana tercemar / Slightly polluted
T/P : Tercemar / Polluted
52 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
BILANGAN 2019 2020
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / STESEN /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS / IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE NUMBER OF
RIVER BASIN WQI CATEGORY CLASS WQI CATEGORY CLASS
STATIONS
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
BILANGAN 2019 2020
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / STESEN /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS / IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE NUMBER OF
RIVER BASIN WQI CATEGORY CLASS WQI CATEGORY CLASS
STATIONS
Sg. Pari 2 72 ST/SP III 80 ST/SP II
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
BILANGAN 2019 2020
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / STESEN /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS / IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE NUMBER OF
RIVER BASIN WQI CATEGORY CLASS WQI CATEGORY CLASS
STATIONS
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
BILANGAN 2019 2020
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / STESEN /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS / IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE NUMBER OF
RIVER BASIN WQI CATEGORY CLASS WQI CATEGORY CLASS
STATIONS
Sg. Belat 1 79 ST/SP II 80 ST/SP II
Sg. Pengkalan
Sg. Pasir Hor 1 67 ST/SP III 73 ST/SP III
Datu
Sg. Kalumpang Sg. Pang Burong 2 1 76 ST/SP III 69 ST/SP III
Jadual 2.2 : Status Kualiti Air bagi Sungai Sederhana Tercemar, 2020
Table 2.2 : Water Quality Status of Slightly Polluted Rivers, 2020
BILANGAN 2019 2020
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / STESEN /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS / IKA / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE NUMBER OF
RIVER BASIN WQI CATEGORY CLASS WQI CATEGORY CLASS
STATIONS
Sg. Sadong Sg. Karangan 2 78 ST/SP II 74 ST/SP III
Nota / Note :
B/C : Bersih / Clean
ST/SP : Sederhana tercemar / Slightly polluted
T/P : Tercemar / Polluted
Kedah Sg. Merbok Sg. Bakar Arang 1 59 T/P III 56 T/P III
Jadual 2.4 menunjukkan IKA sebanyak 24 daripada 34 Table 2.4 shows the WQI and that out of the 34 polluted
sungai tercemar tergolong dalam Kelas III, sembilan (9) rivers, 24 rivers were classified as Class III, while nine (9)
sungai adalah dalam Kelas IV, manakala satu (1) sungai rivers were Class IV, and one (1) river Class V. In terms of
adalah Kelas V. Berdasarkan sub-indeks BOD, dua (2) sungai BOD sub-index, one (1) river was classified as Class II, four
diklasifikasikan sebagai kelas II, empat (4) sungai Kelas III, (4) rivers as Class III, 18 rivers as Class IV and 10 rivers
18 sungai Kelas IV, manakala 10 sungai Kelas V. Dari segi as Class V. In terms of AN sub-index, two (2) rivers were
sub-indeks AN, pula, dua (2) sungai tergolong dalam classified as Class II, also two (2) rivers as Class III, four
Kelas II, dua (2) sungai juga Kelas III, empat (4) sungai Kelas (4) rivers as Class IV and 26 rivers as Class V. In terms of
IV manakala 26 sungai adalah Kelas V. Dari segi sub-indeks SS sub-index, 10 rivers were classified as Class I, 15 rivers
SS, 10 sungai yang diklasifikasikan kelas I, 15 sungai Kelas as Class II, seven (7) rivers as Class III and two (2) rivers as
II, tujuh (7) sungai Kelas III dan dua (2) sungai Kelas IV. Class IV.
Jadual 2.4 : Sungai Tercemar dan Kelas Kualiti Air Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks BOD, AN dan SS, 2020
Table 2.4 : The Polluted Rivers and Classes Based on BOD, AN and SS Sub-Indexes, 2020
KELAS BERDASARKAN /
2020
LEMBANGAN CLASS BASED ON
NEGERI /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER
STATE
RIVER BASIN KATEGORI / KELAS /
IKA / WQI BOD AN SS
CATEGORY CLASS
Jadual 2.4 : Sungai Tercemar dan Kelas Kualiti Air Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks BOD, AN dan SS, 2020
Table 2.4 : The Polluted Rivers and Classes Based on BOD, AN and SS Sub-Indexes, 2020
KELAS BERDASARKAN /
2020
LEMBANGAN CLASS BASED ON
NEGERI /
SUNGAI / SUNGAI / RIVER
STATE
RIVER BASIN KATEGORI / KELAS /
IKA / WQI BOD AN SS
CATEGORY CLASS
Johor /
N. Sembilan / Sg. Muar Sg. Sarang Buaya 58 T/P III III II II
Pahang
Kualiti air sungai yang ditentukan dari segi IKA telah The river water quality in terms of WQI shows an increase
menunjukkan peningkatan pada tahun 2020. Peratus in 2020. The percentage of clean rivers has increased
bilangan sungai yang dikategorikan sebagai bersih slightly from 61% in 2019 to 66% in 2020. The percentage
telah sedikit meningkat kepada 66% pada tahun 2020 of polluted rivers has decreased from 9% in 2019 to 5%
berbanding 61% pada tahun sebelumnya. Peratus bilangan in 2020. These trends are shown in Figure 2.1.
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Berdasarkan sub-indeks BOD, 352 sungai yang dikategori In terms of BOD sub-index, 352 of the monitored rivers
sebagai bersih pada tahun 2020 (Rajah 2.2). Bilangan have been categorised as clean in 2020 (Figure 2.2). The
sungai yang tercemar dari segi sub-indeks BOD telah number of polluted rivers in terms of BOD sub-index
menurun daripada 289 pada tahun 2019 kepada 84 sungai has decreased from 289 in 2019 to 84 rivers in 2020. The
pada tahun 2020. Peningkatan kualiti air sungai dari segi improvement of river water quality in terms of BOD sub-
sub-indeks BOD ini adalah disebabkan oleh pengurangan index is due to the reduction of organic waste from various
pelepasan bahan buangan yang bersifat organik daripada sources including wastewater from industrial, domestic
pelbagai punca seperti air sisa industri, serta aktiviti and commercial activities.
komersil dan domestik.
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 61
100
672 672
638
90
579 577 85%
570
80
Peratus Bilangan Sungai / Percentage Number of River
77%
73%
70
477 477 477 477 477 477 70%
464
59%
60 57% 57%
55%
52%
50
45%
42% 43%
41% 41% 40%
40 37%
36% 39% 35%
32% 33%
30%
30
27% 26% 27%
23%
20 18% 18% 18%
17%
15%
13%
10 9%
8%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Baik / Good Sederhana Tercemar / Slightly Polluted Tercemar / Polluted Jumlah Sungai / Total Number of River
Rajah 2.2 : Tren Kualiti Air Sungai Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks BOD (2008-2020)
Figure 2.2 : River Water Quality Trend Based on BOD Sub-Index (2008-2020)
Dari segi sub-indeks AN pula, bilangan sungai bersih In terms of AN sub-index, the number of clean rivers has
telah meningkat daripada 211 pada tahun 2019 kepada increased from 211 in 2019 to 239 rivers in 2020 (Figure
239 pada tahun 2020 (Rajah 2.3). Bilangan sungai yang 2.3). The number of polluted rivers in terms of AN sub-
tercemar dari segi sub-indeks AN telah bertambah baik index parameter has reduced from 283 in 2019 to 220
daripada 283 pada tahun 2019 kepada 220 sungai pada rivers in 2020. The improvement of river water quality by
tahun 2020. Peningkatan kualiti air sungai yang bagi AN sub-index can be related to the reduction of discharge
sub-indeks AN boleh dikaitkan dengan pengurangan from treated and untreated sewage into the rivers.
pelepasan air sisa kumbahan manusia dan haiwan yang
ke dalam air sungai.
Dari segi sub-indeks SS pula, bilangan sungai yang In terms of SS sub-index, the number of clean rivers has
dikategorikan bersih telah meningkat daripada 456 pada increased from 456 in 2019 to 480 in 2020 (Figure 2.4).
tahun 2019 kepada 480 pada tahun 2020 (Rajah 2.4). The number of polluted rivers in terms of SS sub-index
Bilangan sungai yang dikategorikan sebagai tercemar dari has reduced from 133 in 2019 to 119 rivers in 2020. This
segi sub-indeks SS pula bertambah baik daripada 133 pada can be attributed to the efficient control over earthworks
2019 kepada 119 sungai pada tahun 2020. Peningkatan and land clearing activities in certain areas as well as to
kualiti air sungai dari segi pepejal terampai tersebut the COVID-19 pandemic that has hampered the growth
disebabkan oleh kecekapan kawalan ke atas aktiviti of the construction sector in our country.
kerja tanah dan pembukaan tanah di kawasan-kawasan
tertentu di samping kerencatan terhadap kepesatan
sektor pembinaan negara akibat pandemik COVID-19.
100
90
672 672
638
Peratus Bilangan Sungai / Percentage Number of River
80
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
50 49% 49%
45% 46%
39% 38% 38% 42% 42%
40 38% 37%
36% 36% 36% 36% 36%
34%
32% 33% 32%33%
31% 31% 29% 32% 32%29%29% 31% 31%
30 28% 29% 27%
26% 26%
24% 24%
20 18% 17%
10
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Baik / Good Sederhana Tercemar / Slightly Polluted Tercemar / Polluted Jumlah Sungai / Total Number of River
100
90
672 672
638
Peratus Bilangan Sungai / Percentage Number of River
80 78% 79%
579 577 570 74%
72% 71%
70 68%
63% 62%
59% 464 477 477 477 477 477 477
60
40
35%
32% 33%
30
27% 27%
22% 21% 22% 20%
20 18% 18%
17% 15% 17% 17%
14% 15% 13% 12% 13% 12% 12% 11%
10 10% 10%
10%
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Baik / Good Sederhana Tercemar / Slightly Polluted Tercemar / Polluted Jumlah Sungai / Total Number of River
Analisis kandungan beberapa jenis logam berat dalam The heavy metals content that were analysed in river
air sungai telah dilakukan ke atas Raksa (Hg), Arsenik (As), water were Mercury (Hg), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd),
Kadmium (Cd), Kromium (Cr), Plumbum (Pb), dan Zink Chromium (Cr), Plumbum (Pb), and Zinc (Zn). In 2020,
(Zn). Pada tahun 2020, kesemua sampel air sungai all of the water samples showed that the concentration
telah menunjukkan kandungan logam Hg, Cd dan Zn of Hg, Cd and Zn was within Class II limits. Water samples
pada tahap Kelas II. Sampel air sungai yang diuji telah showed that the concentrations of As (99.2%) were within
menunjukkan kandungan As (99.2%) dalam Kelas II, Class II limits followed by Cr (99.8%) and Pb (99.9%).
dikuti dengan Cr (99.8%), dan Pb (99.9%).
KUALITI AIR SUNGAI DI HULU MUKA SAUK QUALITY OF RIVER WATER AT UPSTREAM INTAKES
Pada tahun 2020, 49 (89.1%) daripada 55 stesen pengawasan In 2020, 49 (89.1%) of the 55 monitoring stations located
kualiti air di hulu muka sauk telah menunjukkan indeks at upstream water intakes showed clean water quality
kualiti air bersih, sementara enam (6) (10.9%) stesen while six (6) (10.9%) stations were categorised as slightly
dikategorikan sebagai sederhana tercemar. Berdasarkan polluted. Based on the overall WQI, 17 (30.9%) stations
IKA juga, 17 (30.9%) stesen telah dikategorikan sebagai were categorised as Class I, 37 (67.3%) were Class II,
kelas I dan 37 (67.3%) adalah Kelas II, manakala satu (1) (1.8%) while one (1) (1.8%) was Class III. Table 2.5 shows the
adalah Kelas III. Jadual 2.5 menunjukkan status kualiti air water quality of the selected water intake stations based
di stesen hulu muka sauk terpilih berdasarkan IKA. on WQI.
Sg. Ulu Sg. Melaka 2LG05 1KMLK003 Ulu Melaka 81 B/C II 87 B/C II
Melaka Sg. Saga 2LG06 1KMLK004 Padang Saga 76 ST/SP III 81 B/C II
Sg. Kedah Sg. Padang Terap 2KD12 1KKDH012 Kuala Nerang 91 B/C II 92 B/C II
P. Pinang Sg. Pinang Sg. Satu 2PG12 1PPNG020 Batu Feringgi 93 B/C I 96 B/C I
Sg. Gelinting 1BM15 1ABNM015 Loji Rawatan Air Ulu Slim 87 B/C II 92 B/C II
Sg. Bernam
Perak Sg. Trolak 1BM14 1ABNM014 Loji Rawatan Air Trolak Timur 91 B/C II 93 B/C I
Sg. Kurau Sg. Air Hitam 2KU07 1AKRU007 Loji Rawatan Air Jelai 92 B/C II 95 B/C I
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 65
Sg. Pila Parit 56PL01 6QRJG023 Igan Water Intake 81 B/C II 62 ST/SP III
66 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Dari segi sub-indeks BOD, 53 (96.4%) stesen telah In terms of BOD sub-index, 53 (96.4%) stations showed
menunjukkan kualiti air pada Kelas II dan dua (2) (3.6%) stesen Class II water quality and two (2) (3.6%) stations as Class
Kelas III. Berdasarkan sub-indeks AN, sebanyak 38 (69.1%) III. In terms of AN sub-index, 38 (69.1%) stations showed
stesen menunjukkan kualiti air pada Kelas I, 15 (27.3%) Kelas water quality of Class I, 15 (27.3%) as Class II, and two (2)
II, dan dua (2) (3.6%) stesen Kelas III. Dari segi sub-indeks SS, 32 (3.6%) as Class III. Meanwhile in terms of SS, 32 (58.2%)
(58.2%) stesen telah dikategorikan sebagai Kelas I, 14 (25.5%) stations were categorised as Class I, 14 (25.5%) as Class II,
stesen Kelas II, tujuh (7) (12.7%) stesen Kelas III, satu (1) (1.8%) seven (7) (12.7%) as Class III, one (1) (1.8%) as Class IV, and
stesen Kelas IV manakala satu (1) (1.8%) stesen Kelas V. one (1) (1.8%) station as Class V.
Jadual 2.6, Jadual 2.7 dan Jadual 2.8 menunjukkan Tables 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8 show the water quality at upstream
kualiti air sungai di stesen di hulu muka sauk masing- stations of water intake points based on BOD, AN and SS
masing berdasarkan sub-indeks BOD, AN dan SS. Rajah sub-indexes respectively. Figure 2.5 shows the percentage
2.5 menunjukkan peratusan stesen hulu muka sauk of water quality of upstream water intake stations in terms
berdasarkan kelas kualiti air dan parameter utama. of classes based on main parameters.
Jadual 2.6 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks BOD, 2020
Table 2.6 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on BOD Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE BOD / BOD /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION BOD SUB- BOD SUB-
INDEX INDEX
2PS 13 1RPLS010 Loji Rawatan Air Arau Fasa IV 81 ST/SP III 90 ST/SP II
Perlis Sg. Perlis Sg. Terusan Mada
2PS 14 1RPLS011 Loji Rawatan Air TTPC, Sg. Baru 83 ST/SP III 88 ST/SP II
Sg. Ulu Sg. Melaka 2LG05 1KMLK003 Ulu Melaka 76 T/P IV 92 B/C II
Melaka Sg. Saga 2LG06 1KMLK004 Padang Saga 75 T/P IV 92 B/C II
Sg. Kedah Sg. Padang Terap 2KD12 1KKDH012 Kuala Nerang 81 ST/SP III 92 B/C II
P. Pinang Sg. Pinang Sg. Satu 2PG12 1PPNG020 Batu Feringgi 88 ST/SP II 94 B/C II
Sg. Gelinting 1BM15 1ABNM015 Loji Rawatan Air Ulu Slim 83 ST/SP III 92 B/C II
Sg. Bernam
Sg. Trolak 1BM14 1ABNM014 Loji Rawatan Air Trolak Timur 83 ST/SP III 90 ST/SP II
Sg. Kurau Sg. Air Hitam 2KU07 1AKRU007 Loji Rawatan Air Jelai 81 ST/SP III 90 ST/SP II
Sg. Manong 2PK62 1APRK060 Loji Rawatan Air Manong 90 ST/SP II 96 B/C II
Perak
Sg. Perak 2PK61 1APRK059 Loji Rawatan Air Sauk 83 ST/SP III 96 B/C II
Sg. Perak
Sg. Tesong 2PK64 1APRK062 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Klah 90 ST/SP II 96 B/C II
Sg. Sepetang Sg. Batu Tegoh 2SP18 1ASPT016 Loji Rawatan Air Bukit Larut 90 ST/SP II 92 B/C II
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 67
Jadual 2.6 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks BOD, 2020
Table 2.6 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on BOD Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE BOD / BOD /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION BOD SUB- BOD SUB-
INDEX INDEX
Sg. Klang Sg. Gombak 1K53 2BKLG020 Loji Rawatan Air Gombak 83 ST/SP III 92 B/C II
Selangor Sg. Batang Labu 1L26 2BLGT028 Loji Rawatan Air Salak Tinggi 79 T/P III 90 ST/SP II
Sg. Langat
Sg. Semenyih 1L09 2BLGT010 Loji Rawatan Air Semenyih 79 T/P III 92 B/C II
Sg. Batu Pahat Sg. Semberong Dam 3BP27 3JBPT021 Semberong Dam 81 ST/SP III 83 ST/SP III
Sg. Benut Sg. Machap Dam 3BN10 3JBNT008 Machap Dam 83 ST/SP III 88 ST/SP II
Jalan Felda Kahang Timur,
Sg. Endau Sg. Kahang 3ED38 3JEND026 78 T/P III 92 B/C II
Kluang
Johor Sg. Jelai 1MN23 3NMUA054 Loji Rawatan Air Dangi 79 T/P III 86 ST/SP III
Sg. Muar Sg. Jementah 3MR39 3JMUA040 Loji Rawatan Air Jementah 88 ST/SP II 92 B/C II
Sg. Muar 3MR38 3JMUA039 Loji Rawatan Air Gombang 88 ST/SP II 88 ST/SP II
Sg. Pulai Sg. Pulai Dam 3PU04 3JPLI004 Pulai Dam 81 ST/SP III 92 B/C II
Muka sauk Loji Rawatan Air
Melaka Sg. Kesang Sg. Chin-Chin 1KA08 3MKSG008 75 T/P IV 90 ST/SP II
Chin-chin
Sg. Bertam 2CH15 4CBTM013 Loji Rawatan Air Habu 88 ST/SP II 96 B/C II
Muka sauk Loji Rawatan
Sg. Gapoi 4PH95 4CPHG086 88 ST/SP II 94 B/C II
Air Gapoi
Sg. Mentiga 4PH98 4CPHG089 Loji Air Chini 86 ST/SP III 92 B/C II
Sg. Terla 2CH14 4CBTM012 Loji Rawatan Air Kuala Terla 86 ST/SP III 96 B/C II
Sg. Triang 4PH93 4CPHG074 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Triang 86 ST/SP III 96 B/C II
Sg. Kerian Sg. Selalang 55SG01 6QKRN017 Selalang Water Intake 96 B/C II 96 B/C II
Sg. Mukah Sg. Mukah 58MH05 6QMKH005 Mukah Water Intake 96 B/C II 96 B/C II
Sg. Pila Parit 56PL01 6QRJG023 Igan Water Intake 92 B/C II 92 B/C II
68 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Jadual 2.7 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks AN, 2020
Table 2.7 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on AN Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE AN / AN /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION AN SUB- AN SUB-
INDEX INDEX
2PS 13 1RPLS010 Loji Rawatan Air Arau Fasa IV 95 B/C I 93 B/C I
Perlis Sg. Perlis Sg. Terusan Mada
2PS 14 1RPLS011 Loji Rawatan Air TTPC, Sg. Baru 91 ST/SP I 94 B/C I
Sg. Ulu Sg. Melaka 2LG05 1KMLK003 Ulu Melaka 93 B/C I 94 B/C I
Melaka Sg. Saga 2LG06 1KMLK004 Padang Saga 82 ST/SP II 80 ST/SP II
Sg. Kedah Sg. Padang Terap 2KD12 1KKDH012 Kuala Nerang 96 B/C I 80 ST/SP II
P. Pinang Sg. Pinang Sg. Satu 2PG12 1PPNG020 Batu Feringgi 99 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Gelinting 1BM15 1ABNM015 Loji Rawatan Air Ulu Slim 96 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Bernam
Sg. Trolak 1BM14 1ABNM014 Loji Rawatan Air Trolak Timur 99 B/C I 97 B/C I
Sg. Kurau Sg. Air Hitam 2KU07 1AKRU007 Loji Rawatan Air Jelai 99 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Manong 2PK62 1APRK060 Loji Rawatan Air Manong 97 B/C I 99 B/C I
Perak
Sg. Perak 2PK61 1APRK059 Loji Rawatan Air Sauk 98 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Perak
Sg. Tesong 2PK64 1APRK062 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Klah 98 B/C I 99 B/C I
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Sg. Sepetang Sg. Batu Tegoh 2SP18 1ASPT016 Loji Rawatan Air Bukit Larut 98 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Klang Sg. Gombak 1K53 2BKLG020 Loji Rawatan Air Gombak 97 B/C I 99 B/C I
Selangor Sg. Batang Labu 1L26 2BLGT028 Loji Rawatan Air Salak Tinggi 38 T/P IV 58 T/P III
Sg. Langat
Sg. Semenyih 1L09 2BLGT010 Loji Rawatan Air Semenyih 60 T/P III 66 T/P III
Sg. Batu Pahat Sg. Semberong Dam 3BP27 3JBPT021 Semberong Dam 96 B/C I 98 B/C I
Sg. Benut Sg. Machap Dam 3BN10 3JBNT008 Machap Dam 72 ST/SP II 96 B/C I
Jalan Felda Kahang Timur,
Sg. Endau Sg. Kahang 3ED38 3JEND026 87 ST/SP II 77 ST/SP II
Kluang
Johor Sg. Jelai 1MN23 3NMUA054 Loji Rawatan Air Dangi 97 B/C I 95 B/C I
Sg. Muar Sg. Jementah 3MR39 3JMUA040 Loji Rawatan Air Jementah 93 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Muar 3MR38 3JMUA039 Loji Rawatan Air Gombang 91 ST/SP I 82 ST/SP II
Sg. Pulai Sg. Pulai Dam 3PU04 3JPLI004 Pulai Dam 79 ST/SP II 98 B/C I
Jadual 2.7 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks AN, 2020
Table 2.7 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on AN Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE AN / AN /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION AN SUB- AN SUB-
INDEX INDEX
Pahang Sg. Pahang Sg. Mentiga 4PH98 4CPHG089 Loji Air Chini 91 ST/SP I 92 B/C I
Sg. Terla 2CH14 4CBTM012 Loji Rawatan Air Kuala Terla 94 B/C I 99 B/C I
Sg. Triang 4PH93 4CPHG074 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Triang 96 B/C I 98 B/C I
Sg. Kerian Sg. Selalang 55SG01 6QKRN017 Selalang Water Intake 67 T/P III 79 ST/SP II
Sg. Mukah Sg. Mukah 58MH05 6QMKH005 Mukah Water Intake 74 ST/SP II 83 ST/SP II
Sg. Daro 56DR01 6QRJG021 Daro Water Intake 66 T/P III 85 ST/SP II
Sarawak
Sg. Jemoreng 56JG01 6QRJG022 Jemoreng Water Intake 69 T/P II 84 ST/SP II
Sg. Rajang
Sg. Pakan 56PN01 6QRJG020 Pakan Water Intake 74 ST/SP II 84 ST/SP II
Jadual 2.8 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks SS, 2020
Table 2.8 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on SS Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE SS / SS /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION SS SUB- SS SUB-
INDEX INDEX
2PS 13 1RPLS010 Loji Rawatan Air Arau Fasa IV 70 ST/SP III 83 B/C II
Perlis Sg. Perlis Sg. Terusan Mada
2PS 14 1RPLS011 Loji Rawatan Air TTPC, Sg. Baru 78 B/C II 82 B/C II
Sg. Ulu Sg. Melaka 2LG05 1KMLK003 Ulu Melaka 71 ST/SP III 75 ST/SP II
Melaka Sg. Saga 2LG06 1KMLK004 Padang Saga 79 B/C II 87 B/C I
Sg. Kedah Sg. Padang Terap 2KD12 1KKDH012 Kuala Nerang 93 B/C I 93 B/C I
Jadual 2.8 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks SS, 2020
Table 2.8 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on SS Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE SS / SS /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION SS SUB- SS SUB-
INDEX INDEX
2MD16 1KMUD014 Jeneri 72 ST/SP II 77 B/C II
Sg. Muda 2MD18 1KMUD016 Bukit Selambau 63 T/P III 56 T/P III
Kedah Sg. Muda
2MD20 1KMUD018 Pinang Tunggal 78 B/C II 75 ST/SP II
P. Pinang Sg. Pinang Sg. Satu 2PG12 1PPNG020 Batu Feringgi 94 B/C I 97 B/C I
Sg. Gelinting 1BM15 1ABNM015 Loji Rawatan Air Ulu Slim 77 B/C II 80 B/C II
Sg. Bernam
Sg. Trolak 1BM14 1ABNM014 Loji Rawatan Air Trolak Timur 89 B/C I 89 B/C I
Sg. Kurau Sg. Air Hitam 2KU07 1AKRU007 Loji Rawatan Air Jelai 90 B/C I 95 B/C I
Sg. Manong 2PK62 1APRK060 Loji Rawatan Air Manong 95 B/C I 95 B/C I
Perak
Sg. Perak 2PK61 1APRK059 Loji Rawatan Air Sauk 93 B/C I 96 B/C I
Sg. Perak
Sg. Tesong 2PK64 1APRK062 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Klah 94 B/C I 96 B/C I
Sg. Sepetang Sg. Batu Tegoh 2SP18 1ASPT016 Loji Rawatan Air Bukit Larut 95 B/C I 96 B/C I
Sg. Klang Sg. Gombak 1K53 2BKLG020 Loji Rawatan Air Gombak 93 B/C I 92 B/C I
Selangor Sg. Batang Labu 1L26 2BLGT028 Loji Rawatan Air Salak Tinggi 64 T/P III 65 T/P III
Sg. Langat
Sg. Semenyih 1L09 2BLGT010 Loji Rawatan Air Semenyih 53 T/P IV 66 T/P III
Sg. Batu Pahat Sg. Semberong Dam 3BP27 3JBPT021 Semberong Dam 84 B/C II 92 B/C I
Sg. Benut Sg. Machap Dam 3BN10 3JBNT008 Machap Dam 90 B/C I 92 B/C I
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Sg. Muar Sg. Jementah 3MR39 3JMUA040 Loji Rawatan Air Jementah 93 B/C I 92 B/C I
Sg. Muar 3MR38 3JMUA039 Loji Rawatan Air Gombang 79 B/C II 88 B/C I
Sg. Pulai Sg. Pulai Dam 3PU04 3JPLI004 Pulai Dam 93 B/C I 96 B/C I
Muka sauk Loji Rawatan Air
Melaka Sg. Kesang Sg. Chin-Chin 1KA08 3MKSG008 57 T/P III 59 T/P III
Chin-chin
Sg. Bertam 2CH15 4CBTM013 Loji Rawatan Air Habu 95 B/C I 95 B/C I
Muka sauk Loji Rawatan
Sg. Gapoi 4PH95 4CPHG086 93 B/C I 91 B/C I
Air Gapoi
4PH96 4CPHG087 Loji Air Sg Jerik 87 B/C I 93 B/C I
Sg. Jempol
4PH97 4CPHG088 Loji Air Jengka 3 80 B/C II 82 B/C II
Pahang Sg. Pahang
Sg. Mentiga 4PH98 4CPHG089 Loji Air Chini 84 B/C II 67 T/P III
Sg. Terla 2CH14 4CBTM012 Loji Rawatan Air Kuala Terla 94 B/C I 92 B/C I
Sg. Triang 4PH93 4CPHG074 Loji Rawatan Air Sg. Triang 57 T/P III 55 T/P III
Sg.
Terengganu Sg. Terengganu 4TE14 4TTGG013 Loji Air Serada 87 B/C I 93 B/C I
Terengganu
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 71
Jadual 2.8 : Status Kualiti Air di Hulu Muka Sauk Berdasarkan Sub-Indeks SS, 2020
Table 2.8 : Water Quality Status of Upstream Water Intakes Based on SS Sub-Index, 2020
2019 2020
STESEN ID STATION SUB- SUB-
LEMBANGAN
NEGERI / SUNGAI / LAMA / ID BARU / MUKA SAUK / INDEKS INDEKS
SUNGAI / KATEGORI / KELAS / KATEGORI / KELAS /
STATE RIVER OLD ID NEW ID WATER INTAKE SS / SS /
RIVER BASIN CATEGORY CLASS CATEGORY CLASS
STATION STATION SS SUB- SS SUB-
INDEX INDEX
Sg. Golok Sg. Golok 4GL10 4DGLK003 Syarikat Air Kelantan 96 B/C I 93 B/C I
Sg. Kerian Sg. Selalang 55SG01 6QKRN017 Selalang Water Intake 94 B/C I 95 B/C I
Sg. Mukah Sg. Mukah 58MH05 6QMKH005 Mukah Water Intake 78 B/C II 82 B/C II
Sg. Pila Parit 56PL01 6QRJG023 Igan Water Intake 91 B/C I 87 B/C I
55 1 2 2 1 100%
1
45 15 80%
40
14 70%
Peratus/ Percentage
35 37
60%
30
50%
25
38 40%
20 53
15 32 30%
10 17 20%
5 10%
0 0
IKA BOD AN SS
Parameter
Kelas I / Class I Kelas II / Class II Kelas III / Class III Kelas IV / Class IV Kelas V / Class V
Rajah 2.5 : Kualiti Air Sungai di Stesen Hulu Muka Sauk, 2020
Figure 2.5 : River Water Quality at Upstream Water Intake Stations, 2020
72 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
STATUS PENGAWASAN KUALITI AIR SUNGAI STATUS OF CONTINUOUS / AUTOMATIC RIVER WATER
AUTOMATIK QUALITY MONITORING (CRWQM)
Rajah 2.6 menunjukkan lokasi 29 stesen pengawasan Figure 2.6 shows the location of the 29 continuous river
sungai automatik serta takat pengambilan air yang monitoring stations and subsequent water intakes as
disenaraikan seperti dalam Jadual 2.9. listed in Table 2.9.
Pada tahun 2020, 29 stesen pengawasan sungai automatik In 2020, 29 continuous river monitoring stations were
telah diukur menggunakan peratusan pematuhan kepada measured using percentage of compliance to Class II. The
kelas II. Parameter yang diukur adalah pH, oksigen terlarut, measured parameter is pH, dissolved oxygen, biochemical
keperluan oksigen biokimia dan kimia, ammoniakal oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, ammoniacal
nitrogen dan jumlah pepejal terampai, Pematuhan ini nitrogen and total suspended solids. This compliance is
ditunjukkan seperti pada Rajah 2.7. shown in Figure 2.7.
Oksigen terlarut (DO) adalah salah satu penunjuk kepada Dissolved oxygen (DO) is one of the indicators of BOD
kehadiran BOD yang disebabkan oleh bahan pencemar presence caused by organic pollutants. Low range
organik. Julat pematuhan DO yang rendah didapati compliance of DO were observed at stations CR01K,
bagi stesen CR01K, CR04P, CR08B, CR12W, CR13N, CR19J CR04P, CR08B, CR12W, CR13N, CR19J and CR21J.
dan CR21J.
Ammonium adalah satu bentuk ammonia yang telah Ammonium is an ionized form of ammonia. The
terion. Pengukuran ammonium memberi petunjuk measurement of ammonium indicates the potential
kepada potensi kehadiran pencemar ammonia atau presence of ammonia or ammoniacal nitrogen pollutants
ammonia nitrogen dalam air sungai apabila pH dan in rivers with the occurrence of pH level and temperature
suhu air berubah. Julat pematuhan yang rendah bagi changes in these waters. Low range compliance of
ammonia nitrogen yang rendah didapati di stesen ammoniacal nitrogen were observed at stations CR04P,
CR04P, CR08B, CR09B, CR10B, CR11B, CR12W, CR13N, CR08B, CR09B, CR10B, CR11B, CR12W, CR13N, CR16M
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
pH adalah ukuran bagi keasidan dan kealkalian pH is a measurement of acidity and alkalinity based on
mengikut skala pH. Julat pematuhan yang rendah bagi the pH scale. Relatively low compliance of pH ranges
pH diperhatikan di CR24T. were observed at CR24T.
Kekeruhan digunakan sebagai penunjuk kehadiran Turbidity is used as an indicator of the presence of
pepejal terampai di dalam sungai. Bagi julat pematuhan suspended solids in a river. Low range compliance of TSS
TSS yang direkodkan adalah rendah adalah stesen were recorded at stations CR01K, CR03K, CR04P, CR06A,
CR01K, CR03K, CR04P, CR06A, CR08B, CR09B, CR10B, CR08B, CR09B, CR10B, CR11B, CR13N, CR14N, CR15N,
CR11B, CR13N, CR14N, CR15N, CR16M, CR17M, CR19J, CR16M, CR17M, CR19J, CR20J, CR21J, CR22C and CR26D.
CR20J, CR21J, CR22C dan CR26D.
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 73
Jadual 2.9 : CRWQMS Lokasi: ID Stesen, Sungai bagi Stesen dan Takat Pengambilan Air
Table 2.9 : CRWQMS Location: Station ID, River of the Station and Water Intake
Rajah 2.6 : Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Sungai Automatik dan Takat Pengambilan Air
Figure 2.6 : Continuous River Water Quality Stations and Water Intakes
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 75
Rajah 2.6 : Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Sungai Automatik Dan Takat Pengambilan Air
Figure 2.6 : Continuous River Water Quality Stations and Water Intakes
Temerloh, Pahang
76 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
78 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 79
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
80 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
RIVER WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 2 81
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
82 BAB 2 KUALITI AIR SUNGAI
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 83
BAB 3
CHAPTER 3
Program Pengawasan Kualiti Air Tanah Kebangsaan The National Groundwater Water Quality Monitoring
telah dimulakan semenjak tahun 1997. Tapak stesen Programme was established in 1997. The sites were
pengawasan yang telah dipilih adalah mewakili jenis guna selected based on specific land use. The groundwater
tanah spesifik. Program pengawasan telah dijalankan monitoring was carried out on 120 groundwater
terhadap 120 buah stesen pengawasan kualiti air tanah quality monitoring stations (wells) throughout the
(telaga) di seluruh negara. Walau bagaimanapun hanya country. However, monitoring for only 114 stations were
114 stesen telah dijalankan persampelan air tanah. Ini conducted for groundwater sampling. This is because
memandangkan terdapat stesen pengawasan kualiti air there was no discharge of groundwater due to
tanah yang tiada luahan air akibat faktor pembangunan development factors and rock fractures in the
dan rekahan batuan di dalam stesen tersebut groundwater quality monitoring stations. Table 3.1
Jadual 3.1 menunjukkan taburan stesen pengawasan shows the distribution of groundwater quality
kualiti air tanah (telaga) seluruh Malaysia mengikut jenis monitoring stations (wells) in all the states by land use
kategori guna tanah. category.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 363 sampel telah dianalisa In 2020, 363 samples were analysed for volatile organic
untuk bahan kimia organik meruap (VOCs), racun compounds (VOCs), pesticides, heavy metals, anions,
perosak, logam berat, anion, bakteria (kolifom), sebatian bacteria (coliform), phenolic compounds, total hardness,
berfenol, jumlah keliatan, jumlah pepejal terlarut, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, temperature, conductivity
suhu, konduktiviti dan oksigen terlarut (DO). and dissolved oxygen (DO).
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah (IKAT) digunakan sebagai satu The Malaysia Groundwater Quality Index (GWQI) is used to
kaedah menentukan kategori dan status kualiti air tanah. determine the groundwater quality status and its category.
IKAT dibangunkan berdasarkan tujuh (7) parameter GWQI was developed based on seven (7) parameters
utama iaitu pH, besi, jumlah pepejal terlarut, nitrat, which are pH, iron, total dissolved solids, nitrate, E-Coli,
E-Coli, fenol dan sulfat. IKAT yang berskala 0 hingga 100 phenol and sulphate. GWQI with a scale quality ranging
akan menentukan kategori kualiti air tanah dari sangat from 0 to 100 will identify the quality of the groundwater
baik hingga sangat tercemar (Jadual 3.2). from excellent to very poor (Table 3.2).
PERLIS
SABAH
4 KELANTAN
6 KEDAH
16 14
6 P. PINANG 16
TERENGGANU
1
W.P. LABUAN
5 PERAK
9
PAHANG
10 SELANGOR
12
SARAWAK
4
N. SEMBILAN
MELAKA
3 JOHOR
6 7 JUMLAH / TOTAL =
W.P. KUALA LUMPUR
1 120
bagi 12 jenis guna tanah/
W.P. PUTRAJAYA
for 12 types of land use
GROUNDWATER QUALITY
Jadual 3.1 : Taburan Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Tanah di Seluruh Negeri di Malaysia mengikut Jenis Kategori Guna Tanah, 2020
Table 3.1 : Distribution of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Stations Throughout the States in Malaysia by Land Use Category, 2020
KATEGORI / BILANGAN TELAGA / BILANGAN TELAGA /
NEGERI / STATE
CATEGORY NUMBER OF WELLS NUMBER OF WELLS
Sabah 2
Terengganu 5
Pahang 1
Kawasan Pertanian /
14 Kedah 2
Agriculture
Perlis 1
Kelantan 2
Selangor 1
Sabah 1
Terengganu 2
Pahang 2
Perak 1
Pahang 1
Perlis 1
Sabah 7
Sarawak 2
Terengganu 2
Johor 2
Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Sampah /
26 Kelantan 3
Used Solid Waste Landfills
Perak 1
Kuala Lumpur 5
N. Sembilan 3
Melaka 1
Sabah 2
Padang Golf /
7 Kelantan 4
Golf Course
Kuala Lumpur 1
Terengganu 1
Luar Bandar /
5 Kelantan 3
Rural
Melaka 1
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 87
Jadual 3.1 : Taburan Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Tanah di Seluruh Negeri di Malaysia mengikut jenis Kategori Guna Tanah, 2020
Table 3.1: Distribution of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Stations (Wells) Throughout the States in Malaysia by Land Use Category, 2020
Tercemar / Poor
IKAT:
Sederhana / Moderate
IKAT:
40-69 Penggunaan industri
Industrial use
Baik / Good
IKAT:
70-89 Berpotensi sebagai air minuman
Potential use as drinking water
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI KAWASAN STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
PERTANIAN AGRICULTURE
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi kawasan The GWQI trend for agriculture from 2016 to 2020 is shown
pertanian adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam in Figure 3.1. Based on Figure 3.1, the number of excellent
Rajah 3.1. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.1, didapati bilangan stations has increased compared to the previous year.
stesen sangat baik telah meningkat berbanding tahun The number of good categories has decreased, and the
sebelumnya. Bilangan stesen baik pula telah menurun, number of moderate stations has decreased. There are
bilangan stesen dalam kategori sederhana telah no stations under poor and very poor category for the
menurun dibandingkan tahun sebelumnya dan tiada year 2020.
stesen tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 14 stesen kawasan pertanian In 2020, a total of 14 stations under agriculture were
telah dipantau berbanding 15 pada tahun 2019. Hasil monitored compared to the previous year of 15
program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan menunjukan monitoring wells. The monitoring result indicates that
lima (5) stesen (36.0%) sangat baik, lapan (8) stesen (57.0%) five (5) stations were excellent (36.0%), eight (8) stations
baik dan satu (1) stesen (7.0%) sederhana (Jadual 3.3). were good (57.0%) and one (1) station was moderate
(7.0%) (Table 3.3).
20
18
16
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
14
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
12
10 10
9
8
8 7 7
6 5 5
4 3 3 3
2 2
2 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 89
Jadual 3.3 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Kawasan Pertanian
Table 3.3 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Agriculture
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / KAWASAN / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN/ STATION
STATE AREA STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi bandar dan GWQI trend for urban and suburban from year 2016 to
pinggir bandar adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam 2020 is shown in Figure 3.2. Based on Figure 3.2, the
Rajah 3.2. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.2 didapati bilangan number of excellent stations has increased compared to
stesen sangat baik telah meningkat berbanding tahun the previous year. There are no stations under poor and
sebelumnya. Tiada stesen tercemar dan sangat tercemar very poor in 2020.
pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 13 stesen bandar dan In 2020, a total of 13 stations under urban and suburban
pinggir bandar telah dipantau sama seperti pada tahun were monitored, the same as in the previous year. The
2019. Hasil program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan monitoring results indicate that five (5) stations (38.0%)
menunjukan lima (5) stesen (38.0%) sangat baik, dan were excellent, and eight (8) stations (62.0%) were good
lapan (8) stesen (62.0%) baik (Jadual 3.4). (Table 3.4).
90 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
20
18
16
14
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
12
10 8 8
8 7
6 6
5 5 5
4 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.2 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bandar dan Pinggir Bandar (2016-2020)
Figure 3.2 : Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Urban and Suburban (2016-2020)
Tahun / Year
Perlis Bandar dan Pinggir Bandar Arau , Perlis MW(7)-R4-1-5.41 80 80 77 76 75 Baik / Good
Urban and Suburban Arau , Perlis MW(7)-R4-1-19.80 96 95 93 87 93 Sangat Baik / Excellent
Bandar dan Pinggir Bandar SK Darul Uloom
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Bandar dan Pinggir Bandar Kg. Raja, Besut MW(7)-T1-1-7.25 82 83 84 79 88 Baik / Good
Terengganu
Urban and Suburban Kg. Raja, Besut MW(7)-T1-1-31.79 82 67 85 64 73 Baik / Good
Bandar dan Pinggir Bandar
Sabah SK Inanam MW(7)-H511601-9-7.50 74 78 80 93 91 Sangat Baik / Excellent
Urban and Suburban
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 91
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI TAPAK STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
PERINDUSTRIAN INDUSTRIAL SITES
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi tapak GWQI trend for industrial sites from year 2016 to 2020 is
perindustrian adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam shown in Figure 3.3. Based on Figure 3.3, the number of
Rajah 3.3. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.3 didapati bilangan excellent stations has increased. The number of stations
stesen sangat baik meningkat. Bilangan stesen baik dan categorised as good and moderate has decreased. No
sederhana telah berkurang. Tiada stesen dalam kategori station was categorised as poor and very poor in 2020.
tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 21 stesen tapak perindustrian In 2020, a total of 21 stations for industrial sites were
telah dipantau sama seperti tahun 2019. Hasil program monitored, the same as the previous year. The monitoring
pengawasan yang telah dijalankan menunjukan empat results indicate that four 4 stations (19.1%) were excellent,
(4) stesen (19.1%) sangat baik, 12 stesen (57.1%) baik dan 12 stations (57.1%) were good and 5 stations (23.5%)
lima (5) stesen (23.5%) sederhana (Jadual 3.5). were moderate (Table 3.5).
20
18
16
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
14 14 14 14
12 12 12
10
8
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.3 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Tapak Perindustrian (2016-2020)
Figure 3.3 : Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Industrial Sites (2016-2020)
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
92 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
Jadual 3.5 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Tapak Perindustrian
Table 3.5 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Industrial Sites
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN / STATION KAWASAN / AREA
STATE STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tapak Perindustrian /
Perlis
Industrial Sites
*Felda Chuping MW(7)-R610006-2-6.55 − − − 71 90 Sangat Baik / Excellent
Tapak Perindustrian /
Kedah Kulim Hi-Tech MW(7)-K3-1-8.45 65 68 70 82 72 Baik / Good
Industrial Sites
Tapak Perindustrian /
Pahang
Industrial Sites
*LYNAS, Gebeng MW(7)-C310302-1-6.50 − − − 66 62 Sederhana / Moderate
Tapak Perindustrian /
Kelantan
Industrial Sites Eastern Garment MFG.
MW(7)-D6-2-4.24 87 90 80 79 71 Baik / Good
Pkln.Chepa
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 93
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI BEKAS TAPAK STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
PELUPUSAN SAMPAH USED SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi bekas tapak The GWQI trend for used solid waste landfills from year
pelupusan sampah adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam 2016 to 2020 is shown in Figure 3.4. Based on Figure 3.4,
Rajah 3.4. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.4 didapati bilangan the number of excellent stations for 2020 has increased
stesen sangat baik telah meningkat berbanding tahun compared to the previous year. The number of stations
sebelumnya. Bilangan stesen baik juga telah meningkat under good category has increased as well, while stations
manakala bilangan stesen sederhana telah menurun in the moderate category has decreased compared to
berbanding tahun sebelumnya. Manakala, tiada stesen the previous year. No station was categorised under poor
dalam kategori tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada and very poor in 2020.
tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 26 stesen bekas tapak In 2020, a total of 26 stations for used solid waste landfills
pelupusan sampah telah dipantau sama seperti tahun were monitored, the same number as last year. The
lepas. Hasil program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan monitoring result indicates that three (3) stations (11.5%)
menunjukan tiga (3) stesen (11.5%) sangat baik, 19 stesen were excellent, 19 stations (73.1%) were good and
(73.1%) baik dan empat (4) stesen (15.4%) sederhana four (4) stations (15.4%) were moderate (Table 3.6).
(Jadual 3.6).
20 19
18 18
17
16
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
14 14
12
12 11
10
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.4 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Sampah (2016-2020)
Figure 3.4 : Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Used Solid Waste Landfills (2016-2020)
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
94 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
Jadual 3.6 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Sampah
Table 3.6 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Used Solid Waste Landfills
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN / STATION KAWASAN / AREA
STATE STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 95
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI PADANG GOLF STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
GOLF COURSES
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi padang The GWQI trend for golf course from year 2016 until
golf adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 2020 is shown in Figure 3.5. Based on Figure 3.5, the
3.5. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.5, didapati bilangan stesen number of excellent stations has increased compared to
sangat baik meningkat berbanding tahun sebelumnya. the previous year. The number of stations under good
Bilangan stesen dalam kategori baik menurun berbanding category has decreased compared to the previous year.
tahun sebelumnya. Tiada stesen yang berada dalam No station was categorised under moderate, poor and
kategori sederhana, tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada very poor in 2020.
tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2015 sebanyak tujuh (7) stesen yang dipantau, In 2015 seven (7) stations were monitored, however
walau bagaimanapun bermula pada tahun 2016 hanya beginning 2016 only six (6) stations were monitored
enam (6) stesen yang dipantau memandangkan satu (1) as one (1) station in Kuala Lumpur had dried up
stesen di Kuala Lumpur telah kering (Jadual 3.7). (Table 3.7).
Hasil program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan The monitoring results indicate that two (2) stations
menunjukan dua (2) stesen (33.3%) sangat baik dan (33.3%) were excellent and four (4) stations (66.7%)
empat (4) stesen (66.7%) baik (Jadual 3.7). were good (Table 3.7).
10
9
8
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
4 4 4 4 4
3
2 2 2
2
1 1 1
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
96 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
Jadual 3.7 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah Bagi Padang Golf
Table 3.7 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Golf Courses
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN / STATION KAWASAN / AREA
STATE STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI LUAR BANDAR STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR RURAL
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi kawasan GWQI trends for rural area from year 2016 to 2020 is
luar bandar adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam shown in Figure 3.6. Based on Figure 3.6. No station
Rajah 3.6. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.6 didapati tiada stesen has been categorised as excellent since year 2015 while
sangat baik sejak tahun 2015 manakala bilangan stesen the number of stations categorised under good has
baik telah menunjukkan peningkatan berbanding tahun increased compared to the previous year. There were
sebelumnya. Tiada stesen dalam kategori tercemar dan no stations under poor and very poor in 2020.
sangat tercemar pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak lima (5) stesen kawasan luar In 2020, a total of five (5) stations under rural area were
bandar telah dipantau berbanding tiga (3) pada tahun monitored compared to only three (3) monitoring wells
2018. Hasil program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan in 2018. The monitoring results indicate that four (4)
menunjukan empat (4) stesen (80.0%) baik dan satu (1) stations (80.0%) were good and one (1) station (20.0%)
stesen (20.0%) sederhana (Jadual 3.8). was moderate (Table 3.8).
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 97
5
4.5
4 4
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
3.5
3 3 3
2.5
2 2 2 2
1.5
1 1 1 1
0.5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.6 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Luar Bandar (2016-2020)
Figure 3.6 : Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Rural (2016-2020)
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Luar Bandar / *Institut Alam Sekitar,
Selangor
Rural EIMAS, UKM Bangi
MW(7)-S210104-1-20.30 − − − 72 85 Baik / Good
Rajah 3.6: Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Luar Bandar (2015-2019)
Melaka
LuarFigure 3.6:*Pusat
Bandar /
Kecemerlangan
Trends of Groundwater
Buangan Terjadual, Quality Index
MW(7)-M210209-2-21.10 − for
− Rural
− (2015-2019)
49 42 Sederhana / Moderate
Rural
JAS Tabuh Naning
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
98 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI BEKAS LOMBONG STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
EMAS USED MINING (GOLD MINE)
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi bekas GWQI trend for used mining (gold mine) from year 2016
lombong emas adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam to 2020 is shown in Figure 3.7. Based on Figure 3.7, the
Rajah 3.7. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.7 didapati satu (1) stesen year 2020 had one (1) station categorised as excellent
berada dalam kategori sangat baik. Dua (2) stesen and two (2) stations as good. No station was categorised
berada dalam kategori baik. Tiada stesen dalam kategori as moderate, poor and very poor in 2020.
sederhana, tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak tiga (3) stesen bekas lombong In 2020, a total of three (3) stations for used mining (gold
emas telah dipantau. Hasil program pengawasan yang mine) were monitored. The monitoring results indicate
telah dijalankan menunjukan satu (1) stesen (33.3%) that one (1) station (33.3%) was excellent and two (2)
sangat baik dan dua (2) stesen (66.7%) baik (Jadual 3.9). stations (66.7%) were good (Table 3.9).
5
4.5
4
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
3.5
3 3 3 3
2.5
2 2 2
1.5
1 1 1
0.5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.7 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Lombong Emas (2016-2020)
TerbaikFigure 3.7 : Trends
/ Excellent of/ Groundwater
Baik Good Quality Index
Sederhana for Used Mining
/ Moderate (Gold
Tercemar Mine) (2016-2020)
/ Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Jadual 3.9 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Lombong Emas
Table 3.9 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Used Mining (Gold Mine)
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / KAWASAN / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN/ /Excellent
Terbaik STATION Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
STATE AREA STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI BEKALAN AIR STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
WATER SUPPLY
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi bekalan The GWQI trend for water supply from year 2016 to 2020 is
air adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 3.8. shown in Figure 3.8. Based on Figure 3.8, the number of
Berdasarkan Rajah 3.8 didapati stesen bagi kategori stations categorised as excellent same as in the previous
sangat baik sama seperti tahun sebelumnya manakala year. Stations categorised as good remain unchanged
stesen bagi kategori baik kekal sejak tahun 2018. Tiada since 2018. No station was categorised under moderate,
stesen dalam kategori sederhana, tercemar dan sangat poor and very poor in 2020.
tercemar pada tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak lima (5) stesen bekalan air In 2020, a total of five (5) stations for water supply
telah dipantau sama seperti pada tahun 2019. Hasil were monitored compared to the previous year. The
program pengawasan yang telah dijalankan menunjukan monitoring results indicate that one (1) station (20.0%)
satu (1) stesen (20.0%) sangat baik dan empat (4) stesen was excellent while four (4) stations (80.0%) were good
(80.0%) baik (Jadual 3.10). (Table 3.10).
10
9
8
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
7
6
5 5
4 4 4 4 4
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.8: Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekalan Air (2015-2019)
Figure 3.8: Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Water Supply (2015-2019)
100 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
Jadual 3.10 : Status Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekalan Air
Table 3.10 : Status of Groundwater Quality Index for Water Supply
KLASSIFIKASI NILAI IKAT / GWQI VALUE
NEGERI / NOMBOR STESEN / KATEGORI (2020) /
STESEN / STATION KAWASAN / AREA
STATE STATION NUMBER CATEGORY (2020)
CLASSIFICATION 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Bekalan Air /
Sabah Kg. Tajau Laut, Kudat MW(7)-H511604-1-4.5 84 80 75 87 88 Baik / Good
Water Supply
LAKU (Lambir),
MW(7)-QM-L1-30.50 68 62 59 75 83 Baik / Good
No. 1, Miri
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI BEKAS TAPAK STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
PELUPUSAN BANGKAI HAIWAN USED ANIMAL BURIAL SITES
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi bekas The GWQI trend for used animal burial sites from year
tapak pelupusan bangkai haiwan adalah seperti yang 2016 to 2020 is shown in Figure 3.9. Based on Figure
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 3.9. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.9 3.9, the number of stations in the excellent category,
didapati jumlah stesen dalam kategori sangat baik increased from the previous year. The number of good
meningkat dari tahun sebelumnya. Bilangan stesen baik and moderate stations decreased in this year. There were
dan sederhana menurun pada tahun ini. Tiada stesen no stations under the poor and very poor category in
dalam kategori tercemar dan sangat tercemar pada 2020.
tahun 2020.
Pada tahun 2020 sebanyak 13 stesen yang dipantau, In 2020, 13 stations were monitored (Table 3.11). The
(Jadual 3.11). Hasil program pengawasan yang telah monitoring results indicate that four (4) stations (30.8%)
dijalankan menunjukan empat (4) stesen (30.8%) sangat baik, were excellent, eight (8) stations (61.5 %) were good and
lapan (8) stesen (61.5%) baik dan satu (1) stesen (7.7%) one (1) station (7.7%) was moderate (Table 3.11)
sederhana (Jadual 3.11).
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 101
20
18
Bil Stesen / Number of Stations
16
14
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
12 12
11
10 9 9
8 8
6
4 4
3 3
2 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Rajah 3.9 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Bangkai Haiwan (2016-2020)
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Figure 3.9 : Trends of Groundwater Quality Index for Used Animal Burial Sites (2016-2020)
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
102 BAB 3 KUALITI AIR TANAH
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI AKUAKULTUR STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
AQUACULTURE
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi akuakultur The GWQI trend for aquaculture from year 2016 to
adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 3.10. 2020 is shown in Figure 3.10. Based on Figure 3.10, no
Berdasarkan Rajah 3.10 didapati tiada stesen sangat station was categorised as excellent in the year 2020.
baik pada tahun 2020. Bilangan stesen baik meningkat The number of stations categorised as good increased
berbanding tahun sebelumnya manakala bilangan compared to the previous year while the number of
stesen bagi kategori sederhana menurun berbanding stations categorised as moderate decreased compared
tahun 2019. Tiada stesen dalam kategori tercemar dan to the year 2019. No station was categorised under poor
sangat tercemar pada tahun 2020. and very poor in 2020.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak tujuh (7) stesen bagi In 2020, a total of seven (7) stations for aquaculture were
akuakultur telah dipantau. Hasil program pengawasan monitored. The monitoring results indicate that four
yang telah dijalankan, empat (4) stesen (57.1%) baik, (4) stations (57.1%) were good while three (3) stations
manakala tiga (3) stesen (42.9%) sederhana (Jadual 3.12). (42.9%) were moderate (Table 3.12).
10
9
8
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
7
6 6 6 6
5 5
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
4
4
3 3
2
1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.10 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Akuakultur (2016-2020)
Terbaik / Excellent Figure/ Good
Baik 3.10 : TrendsSederhana
of Groundwater Quality Index
/ Moderate for Aquaculture
Tercemar
Tahun / Year
/ Poor (2016-2020)
Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.10: Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Akuakultur (2015-2019)
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 103
Sederhana/
Nenasi (Agrobest) MW(7)-C16-2-10.5 81 80 81 62 61
Moderate
Akuakultur / Sederhana/
Terengganu
Aquaculture
*Blue Archipelago MW(7)-T510208-2-14.00 − − − 66 68
Moderate
Nota / Note :
* Stesen Baru / New Station
− Tiada Data / No Data :
i. Tiada Air / No Water
ii. Stesen Rosak / Damaged Station
STATUS KUALITI AIR TANAH BAGI PERANGINAN STATUS OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY INDEX FOR
RESORTS
Tren IKAT mulai tahun 2016 hingga 2020 bagi The GWQI trend for resorts from year 2016 to 2020 is
peranginan adalah seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam shown in Figure 3.11. Based on Figure 3.11, no station
Rajah 3.11. Berdasarkan Rajah 3.11 didapati tiada was categorised as excellent when compared to the year
stesen dikategorikan sebagai sangat baik berbanding 2019. No station was categorised under good in 2020,
tahun 2019. Tiada stesen baik yang ditunjukkan pada while one (1) station was categorised as moderate in
tahun 2020, manakala satu (1) stesen yang dikategorikan 2020. There were no stations under poor and very poor
sebagai sederhana. Tiada stesen dalam kategori tercemar since 2015.
dan sangat tercemar sejak tahun 2015.
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak satu (1) stesen bagi In 2020, one (1) station of the two (2) for resorts was
peranginan telah dipantau berbanding dua (2) pada monitored compared to two (2) for 2019. This was
tahun 2019. Hasil program pengawasan yang telah because of the Movement Control Order imposed by the
dijalankan, satu (1) stesen adalah sederhana manakala Government at that time. The monitoring result indicates
satu (1) stesen tidak dapat dijalankan persampelan kerana one (1) station (50.0%) categorised as moderate while
Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) yang dikeluarkan one (1) station could not be sampled. (Table 3.13).
oleh Kerajaan Malaysia (Jadual 3.13).
2.0
1.8
1.6
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
1.4
1.2
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
1 1 1 1 1 1
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Sangat Baik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Rajah 3.11 : Tren Indeks Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Peranginan (2016-2020)
Tahun / Year
Figure 3.11 : Trend of Groundwater Quality Index for Resorts (2016-2020)
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana/ Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Excellent Baik / Good Sederhana / Moderate Tercemar / Poor Sangat Tercemar / Very Poor
GROUNDWATER QUALITY CHAPTER 3 105
*Kuarters Imigresen
Kedah Peranginan / Resort
Tanjung Rhu, Langkawi
MW(7)-KV 69912-1-10.10 − − − 68 57 Sederhana / Moderate
Jadual 3.14 : Standard Kualiti Air Tanah bagi Rawatan Air Mentah Secara Konvensional
(Air Minuman) Merujuk kepada Parameter Utama dalam Penilaian Status Kualiti Air Tanah
Table 3.14 : Groundwater Quality Standards for Conventional Treatment of Raw Water
(Drinking Water) with Reference to Significant Parameters in Assessment of Groundwater Quality Status
Penilaian terhadap kualiti air tanah adalah berdasarkan The assessment of groundwater quality was based on the
kepada nilai peratusan yang melebihi had penerimaan dalam percentage value exceeding the acceptance level of the
Standard Kebangsaan Bagi Standard Kualiti Air Tanah Bagi National Standards of Groundwater Quality Standards for
Rawatan Air Mentah Secara Konvensional (Air Minuman). Conventional Raw Water Treatment (Drinking Water).
Nilai peratusan tersebut adalah sebagaimana di dalam The percentage value is as shown in Table 3.15.
Jadual 3.15.
Jadual 3.15 : Peratusan Julat Nilai Pematuhan, 2020 / Table 3.15 : Percentage Range of Compliance, 2020
PERATUSAN JULAT NILAI PEMATUHAN (%) /
KATEGORI / CATEGORY
PERCENTAGE RANGE OF COMPLIANCE (%)
Pada tahun 2020, keputusan yang diperoleh daripada In 2020, the results derived from monitoring showed
pengawasan kualiti air tanah yang dijalankan menunjukkan that all stations were within the Groundwater Quality
bahawa semua stesen berada dalam julat nilai pematuhan Standards for Conventional Raw Water Treatment
Standard Kualiti Air Tanah Bagi Rawatan Air Mentah Secara (Drinking Water) values except for iron (Fe), manganese
Konvensional (Air Minuman) kecuali bagi mangan (Mn), jumlah (Mn), total coliform and phenolics which had a low range
kolifom, besi (Fe) dan sebatian fenol mempunyai peratusan of Groundwater Quality Standards for Conventional Raw
julat nilai pematuhan Standard Kualiti Air Tanah Bagi Rawatan Water Treatment (Drinking Water) value as shown in
Air Mentah Secara Konvensional (Air Minuman) yang rendah Figure 3.12 and Table 3.16.
bagi guna tanah tertentu seperti Rajah 3.12 dan Jadual 3.16.
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Jadual 3.17 menunjukkan nilai peratusan yang melebihi Table 3.17 shows the percentage of Groundwater Quality
Standard Kualiti Air Tanah mengikut negeri. Standards exceedance by state.
Jadual 3.16 : Peratusan Pematuhan oleh Pencemar Terpilih mengikut Guna Tanah dalam Peratusan Julat 0% - 49%, 2020
Table 3.16 : Percentage of Compliance of Selected Contaminants by Land Use in Percentage of 0% - 49%, 2020
PERATUSAN PEMATUHAN KEPADA STANDARD /
KATEGORI GUNA TANAH / CATEGORY OF LAND USE PARAMETER
PERCENTAGE OF STANDARD COMPLIANCE
Tiada / Nil Tiada / Nil 0% - 10%
Tapak Perindustrian / Industrial Sites
Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Sampah / Used Solid Waste Landfill Fe
Phenol
Bekalan Air / Water Supply 11% - 30%
Mn
Padang Golf / Golf Course T-Coliform
Bekas Lombong / Used Mining
Tapak Perindustrian / Industrial Sites
Bekas Tapak Pelupusan Sampah / Used Solid Waste Landfill Fe
Luar Bandar / Rural Phenol
Mn 31% - 49%
Bekalan Air / Water Supply T-Coliform
Padang Golf / Golf Course
Bekas Lombong / Used Mining
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
10
0
T-
As Hg Cd Cr Cu Fe Pb Mn Zn Se CaCO3 TDS CI NO3 SO4 Coliform Phenol
Bekalan Air / Water Supply 50 67 100 80 100 10 80 40 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 20 90
Bandar / Pinggir Bandar / Urban / Suburban 100 100 100 100 100 48 100 57 100 100 93 95 96 100 100 71 42
Padang Golf / Golf Course 100 100 100 100 100 17 100 50 100 100 100 92 100 100 93 90 33
Luar Bandar / Rural 100 100 100 100 100 50 50 43 100 88 100 50 100 100 60 72 39
Bekas Lombong / Used Mining 58 100 100 100 100 25 100 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 33 85
GROUNDWATER QUALITY
Rajah 3.12 : Peratusan Pematuhan oleh Pencemar Terpilih mengikut Guna Tanah, 2020
Figure 3.12 : Percentage of Compliance of Selected Contaminants by Land Use, 2020
CHAPTER 3
107
Jadual 3.17 : Nilai Peratusan yang Melebihi Standards Kualiti Air Tanah mengikut Negeri, 2020
Table 3.17 : Percentage Value Exceeding Groundwater Quality Standards by State, 2020
BILANGAN NILAI PERATUSAN YANG MELEBIHI GWQI(%) /
NEGERI/ STESEN / MAKLUMAT STESEN / THE PERCENTAGE OF EXCEEDANCE GWQI (%)
STATE NO. OF STATION DESCRIPTION
STATION As Fe Mn T-COLIFORM PHENOL
1) ITAC, Penampang 1 75 50 50 0 75
2) ITAC, Penampang 2 25 25 75 100 100
3) ITAC, Penampang 3 0 0 50 50 100
4) ITAC, Penampang 4 0 0 50 50 50
5) ITAC, Penampang 5 50 50 50 50 50
6) ITAC, Penampang 6 0 0 50 100 100
7) ITAC, Penampang 7 0 25 50 100 100
Sabah 14
8) Limbawang 25 75 100 100 100
9) Tawau 25 25 50 100 100
10 Kg. Tajau Laut 0 75 75 100 100
11) Sandakan Golf Club No.1 25 0 0 50 75
12) Sandakan Golf Club No.2 25 25 25 100 75
13) Inanam 0 75 75 75 75
14) Pulau Manukan - - - - -
W.P. Labuan 1 1) Asian Supply Base 0 25 75 100 100
1) Kemuyang no.1 0 75 100 75 75
2) Kemuyang no.2 0 75 100 100 100
3) Kabong 75 100 100 100 100
4) Kuala Lawas no.1 100 0 0 50 100
5) Kuala Lawas no.2 - - - - -
6) Laku 0 75 0 75 75
Sarawak 12
7) Kg. Lusut Kir 50 100 100 100 100
8) Bau no.1 100 100 100 100 100
9) Bau no.2 75 75 100 100 100
10) Bau 25 75 25 75 75
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Jadual 3.17 : Nilai Peratusan yang Melebihi Standards Kualiti Air Tanah mengikut Negeri, 2020
Table 3.17 : Percentage Value Exceeding Groundwater Quality Standards by State, 2020
Jadual 3.17 : Nilai Peratusan yang Melebihi Standards Kualiti Air Tanah mengikut Negeri, 2020
Table 3.17 : Percentage Value Exceeding Groundwater Quality Standards by State, 2020
2) Jalong no.2 - - - - -
Selangor 10
6) Stesen Kampung Sungai Keroh, Sepang 75 50 75 100 100
3) Bayan Lepas 0 0 0 75 75
Pulau Pinang 6
4) Valdor (Kelapa) 0 75 75 50 75
5) Valdor (Tengah) 0 0 0 50 50
6) Valdor (Jalan) 0 0 75 75 75
1) Senawang 75 50 0 75 75
4) TPS Tanah Merah (Cypark) Port Dickson 100 100 100 100 100
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 111
BAB 4
CHAPTER 4
Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS) telah menjalankan The Department of Environment (DOE) has been
pengawasan kualiti air marin semenjak tahun 1978 di monitoring the marine water quality since 1978 in
Semenanjung Malaysia dan 1985 di Sabah dan Sarawak. Peninsular Malaysia and since 1985 in Sabah and Sarawak.
Objektif utama program pengawasan kualiti air marin The primary objective of the monitoring programme
ini adalah untuk menilai status kualiti air marin dan is to assess the marine water quality status and
seterusnya untuk menentukan tahap pencemaran subsequently to determine the degree of pollution
daripada punca-punca di daratan dan juga laut. Punca- from both land-based as well as sea-based sources. The
punca pencemaran ini boleh menimbulkan ancaman pollution sources are threatening both the sustainability
pada kemampanan ekosistem dari segi kesihatan dan of the ecosystem health and the biodiversity of the
biodiversiti persekitaran marin. marine environment.
Stesen-stesen pengawasan yang dibangunkan di bawah Monitoring stations established under the Marine Water
Program Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin diklasifikasikan Quality Monitoring Program are classified into three (3)
kepada tiga (3) kategori seperti berikut:- groups as follows:
Stesen Muara
1 Stesen Pantai
Coastal Stations 2 Sungai
Estuary Stations
3 Stesen Pulau
Island Stations
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Stesen pantai terletak di sepanjang pantai kira-kira Coastal stations are located along the coastline;
100 meter dari gigi air laut dan ia mestilah sekurang- approximately 100 meter from the water edge and it
kurangnya 500 meter dari punca yang berpotensi must be at least 500 meters away from potential point
sebagai punca pencemaran. source(s).
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 113
Stesen muara sungai terletak di persekitaran muara Estuary stations are located within an estuarine
sungai di mana terdapat interaksi antara air tawar dan environment where the freshwater and seawater interact.
air laut. Stesen muara sungai banyak menerima kesan The estuarine stations have been impacted by the
daripada ekosistem sungai. riverine ecosystem.
Stesen pulau pula dibahagikan kepada empat (4) kategori Island Stations are further divided into four (4) categories :
termasuk Pulau (Kawasan Dilindungi), Pulau (Taman Island (Protected Area), Island (Marine Park), Island
Laut), Pulau (Pembangunan) dan Pulau (Resort). (Development) and Island (Resorts).
• Stesen Pulau (Kawasan Dilindungi) adalah stesen • Island Stations (Protected Area) are those stations
yang dibangunkan di dalam Kawasan Perlindungan established within the Fisheries Protected Area under
Perikanan di bawah Peraturan-Peraturan Perikanan the Fisheries (Prohibited Area) Regulation, 1994.
(Kawasan Larangan) 1994.
• Island Stations (Marine Park) are those established
• Stesen Pulau (Taman Laut) adalah stesen pengawasan within the designated Marine Park area under the
yang dibangunkan di kawasan Taman Laut yang Marine Parks Malaysia Order 1994.
ditetapkan di bawah Perintah Penubuhan Taman
• Island Stations (Development) are monitoring
Laut Malaysia 1994.
stations established around islands that are at least
• Stesen Pulau (Pembangunan) adalah stesen 90 km2 with a total population of more than 20,000
pengawasan yang dibangunkan di sekitar pulau people and/or islands of economic importance.
yang sekurang-kurangnya 90 km dengan jumlah
2
• Island Stations (Resort) are those that have been
penduduk lebih daripada 20,000 orang; atau/ dan
established surrounding islands developed for
pulau-pulau yang ada kepentingan ekonomi.
tourism; with resorts and chalets developed on the
• Stesen Pulau (Resort) adalah stesen pengawasan di islands as the key economy driver for the islands.
sekitar pulau yang dibangunkan untuk pelancongan,
yang mempunyai resort dan chalet sebagai pemacu
ekonomi setempat bagi pulau tersebut.
Pemakaian SKAMM adalah berdasarkan pra penentuan The application of MMWQS is based on the pre-
pengkelasan air marin mengikut kegunaan di persekitaran determination of marine water classification according
tersebut. Terdapat lima (5) kelas dikategorikan dalam to its uses in the environment. Five (5) classes are
SKAMM iaitu:- categorized in MMWQS:-
1. Kelas 1 merangkumi air di perairan yang diwartakan atau 1. Class 1 water comprises the gazetted and statutory
ada perlindungan berkanun dan perairan yang tidak protected waters; and un-gazetted areas but with
diwartakan tetapi ada ekosistem marin yang sensitif seperti the presence of sensitive ecosystem including coral
terumbu karang, rumpai laut, tapak pendaratan penyu reefs, seagrass, turtle landing sites and water specific
dan perairan yang terdapat habitat tertentu seperti habitat to habitats and feeding grounds of sensitive marine
sensitif kawasan sumber makanan organisma marin. organisms.
114 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
2. Kelas 2 merangkumi air yang ada aktiviti perikanan 2. Class 2 water encompasses both fisheries and
dan marikultur yang berdasarkan pada zon mariculture activities, based on fishing zones
penangkapan ikan yang diterbitkan oleh Jabatan established by the Department of Fisheries as a
Perikanan sebagai panduan. Perairan dalam Kelas guide. Its water comprises the conservation zone
2 terdiri daripada sebahagian zon pemuliharaan (including ‘Fisheries Prohibited Area’) right up to the
(termasuk `Kawasan Larangan Perikanan’) sehingga Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). Mariculture activities
ke Zon Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE). Aktiviti marikultur are defined within the marine water bodies such as
yang ditakrifkan sebagai Kelas 2 adalah aktiviti marine cage and cockle culture; but excluding land
dalam badan air marin tersebut (seperti penternakan aquaculture activities.
sangkar dan penternakan kerang) dan tidak termasuk
aktiviti akuakultur perikanan darat.
3. Kelas 3 ialah standard untuk kualiti air marin yang 3. Class 3 is the standard for marine water which is
terdedah kepada pelepasan efluen secara langsung exposed to direct effluence from anthropogenic
daripada aktiviti antropogenik. Oleh itu, ekosistem activities. Hence, ecosystems in these areas are
di perairan ini akan mengalami banyak pencemaran. subject to some degree of degradation. The
Tahap perlindungan adalah bertujuan untuk corresponding level of protection is therefore aimed
mengekalkan kesihatan ekosistem yang masih ada dan at sustaining the health of the remaining ecosystem
memulihara kualiti air marin di kawasan yang terjejas. and to improve water quality of the affected area.
4. Kelas E (Interim) adalah standard yang banyak 4. Class E (Interim) is the standard for estuarine water
dipengaruhi oleh musim dan variasi diurnal. Selain subject to both seasonal and diurnal variation. In
itu, ciri-ciri geologi dan corak pergerakan air turut addition, the geological characteristics and water
menyumbang pada sifat dinamik di perairan ini. circulation patterns also contribute to the dynamic nature
Berdasarkan pada kepelbagaian semulajadi ini, of these waters. Based on these natural variations, the
Standard Kelas E terhasil adalah daripada ciri- standards derived from the water quality characteristic
ciri kualiti air muara sungai yang boleh mewakili of estuarine waters is deemed to represent a relatively
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
persekitaran yang belum terganggu. Kawasan muara undisturbed environment. These sites, which are
sungai sebegini akan dijadikan tapak rujukan untuk referred to as Reference Sites, are selected to represent
mewakili tiga jenis muara utama di Malaysia. Kelas the three major estuary types in Malaysia. Hence,
E1 dipilih untuk mewakili muara jenis dataran pantai, Class E1 is taken to be representative of coastal plain,
Kelas E2 mewakili muara jenis lagun manakala Kelas Class E2 represents the lagoon type estuary while
E3 akan mewakili muara sungai yang besar dan ada Class E3 is to be referred to when assessing estuaries
rangkaian kompleks. with large and complex distributary network.
5. Kelas R adalah standard untuk kegunaan air marin 5. Class R is the standard for recreational use of marine
bagi tujuan rekreasi. Ia merujuk pada Standard waters. It is based on the National Standard for Water
Kebangsaan Kualiti Air Rekreasi Semulajadi dan Quality for Nature-based Recreation, and Guidelines
Garispanduan bagi Pemantauan Kualiti Air Rekreasi for Monitoring for Nature-based Recreation (Marine
Semulajadi (Air Marin & Air Tawar) yang diterbitkan and Freshwater) by the Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
oleh Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia.
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 115
IKAMM adalah pengagregatan parameter kualiti air MMWQI is an aggregation of the most relevant marine water
marin yang paling relevan bertujuan untuk menyediakan quality parameters aimed at providing information pertinent
maklumat yang berkaitan dengan status kualiti air marin to the marine water quality status of a water body. The index
bagi badan air. Indeks ini berdasarkan pada enam (6) is derived based on six (6) water quality parameters, which
parameter kualiti air iaitu oksigen terlarut, faecal coliform, are dissolved oxygen, faecal coliform, unionized ammonia,
ammonia, nitrat, fosfat dan jumlah pepejal terampai. nitrate, phosphate and total suspended solid.
Pengagregatan IKAMM adalah dalam julat daripada 0 The MMWQI aggregation is scaled from 0 to 100 where
hingga 100, dengan 0 menunjukkan kualiti air sebagai 0 indicates poor water quality while 100 indicates
tercemar manakala 100 menunjukkan kualiti air sebagai excellent water quality (Table 4.1).
terbaik (Jadual 4.1).
Sebanyak 188 stesen pantai, 85 stesen muara sungai A total of 188 coastal stations, 85 estuary stations and
dan 95 stesen pulau telah dipantau pada tahun 2020. 95 island stations were monitored in the year of 2020.
Terdapat enam (6) frekuensi persampelan bagi setiap There were six (6) sampling frequencies in total for each
stesen dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 1127 sampel monitoring station amounting to 1127 samples for
untuk stesen pantai, 509 sampel untuk stesen muara coastal stations, 509 samples for estuary stations and 565
sungai dan 565 sampel untuk stesen pulau. Sampel- samples for island stations. The samples were analysed
sampel tersebut dianalisa dan hasil analisa dirumuskan and results were summarised based on the MMWQI of
berdasarkan IKAMM bagi enam (6) frekuensi. the six (6) frequencies.
Oksigen Terlarut /
>6.0 >5.0 >3.0 >5.0 >5.0 >5.0
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
Kromium (VI) / Chromium (VI) 0.14 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Arsenik (III) / Arsenic (III) 1.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) 100.0 200.0 1000.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Jumlah Fenol / Total Phenol 1.0 10.0 100.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Minyak & Gris / Oil & Grease (mg/l) 0.01 0.14 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Suhu / Temperature (ºC) ≤ 2 ºC bertambah melebihi ambien maksimum / ≤ 2 ºC increase over maximum ambient
pH 6.5 - 9.0
Marine Litter Bebas dari marine litter / Free from marine litter
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 117
STATUS STESEN-STESEN PENGAWASAN KUALITI AIR STATUS OF MARINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
MARIN STATIONS
Dalam tahun 2020, daripada 368 stesen pengawasan In 2020, out of the 368 marine water quality monitoring
kualiti air marin bagi pantai, muara sungai dan pulau di stations at coastal, estuary and islands in the country,
negara ini, sebanyak 104 stesen adalah terbaik, 56 stesen 104 stations were categorised as excellent, 56 stations are
baik, sementara 190 stesen sederhana manakala 18 good, while 190 stations were categorised as moderate.
stesen tercemar. The remaining 18 stations were categorised as poor.
13 daripada stesen tercemar berada di kawasan muara 13 of the poor water quality stations were located at
sungai, empat (4) di kawasan pantai dan satu (1) di the estuary, four (4) were located at coastal while the
kawasan pulau. remaining one (1) was located at the island.
Selangor mempunyai bilangan stesen tercemar yang Selangor had the largest number of poor stations, followed
paling tinggi, diikuti oleh Pulau Pinang, Johor, Sarawak, by Penang, Johor, Sarawak, Perak and Melaka. Only
Perak dan Melaka. Hanya Terengganu dan Wilayah Terengganu and Labuan Federal Territory did not register
Persekutuan Labuan yang tidak mempunyai rekod stesen any poor stations in 2020 . Faecal coliforms, nutrients and
tercemar pada tahun ini. Faecal coliforms, nutrien dan total suspended solids (TSS) are key parameters that have
jumlah pepejal terampai adalah parameter utama yang degraded the consistency of the water quality in the Manual
menyebabkan kualiti air marin merosot secara konsistensi Marine Water Quality Monitoring (MMWQM) network.
dalam rangkaian Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin Manual.
Jumlah faecal coliform, E. coli dan enterococci yang tinggi High faecal coliform, E. coli and enterococci levels found
terdapat di stesen yang kategori tercemar yang terletak in stations under the poor category were situated near
berdekatan muara sungai menunjukkan kemungkinan river estuaries suggesting the possibility of sewage
terdapat pencemaran kumbahan di persekitaran marin. contamination in the marine environment.
Fenomena La Nina dan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan The La Nina phenomena and the Government Movement
Jadual 4.3, Jadual 4.4 dan Jadual 4.5 menunjukkan Table 4.3, Table 4.4 and Table 4.5 show the list of coastal,
senarai stesen pantai, muara sungai dan pulau yang estuary and island stations that achieved the excellent
mencapai kategori terbaik berdasarkan IKAMM bagi category based on MMWQI in 2020.
tahun 2020.
Rajah 4.1-4.6 menunjukkan status kualiti air marin Figures 4.1-4.6 shows the marine water quality status
berdasarkan IKAMM mengikut lokasi stesen pengawasan based on MMWQI according to coastal, estuary and
bagi pantai, muara sungai dan pulau-pulau tahun 2020 island monitoring stations, 2020.
118 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Jadual 4.3 : Senarai Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Pantai dengan Status Kategori Terbaik, 2020
Table 4.3: List of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations for Coastal with Status of Excellent, 2020
BIL. / NO. NEGERI / STATE LOKASI / LOCATION
Jadual 4.4 : Senarai Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Muara Sungai dengan Status Kategori Terbaik, 2020
Table 4.4: List of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations for Estuary with Status of Excellent, 2020
BIL. / NO. NEGERI / STATE LOKASI / LOCATION
Jadual 4.5 : Senarai Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Pulau dengan Status Kategori Terbaik, 2020
Table 4.5: List of Marine Island Water Quality Monitoring Stations for Island with Status of Excellent, 2020
BIL. / NO. NEGERI / STATE LOKASI / LOCATION
PERLIS
KEDAH
P. PINANG
KELANTAN
TERENGGANU
PERAK
PAHANG
SELANGOR
W.P. KUALA LUMPUR
STATUS KUALITI AIR MARIN / W.P. PUTRAJAYA
MARINE WATER QUALITY STATUS N. SEMBILAN
Sederhana / Moderate
Rajah 4.1 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Pantai di Semenanjung Malaysia
Figure 4.1 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Coastal at Peninsular Malaysia
Terbaik / Excellent
Sederhana / Moderate
W.P. LABUAN SABAH
Tercemar / Poor
SARAWAK
0 100 km 200 km
Rajah 4.2 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Pantai di Sabah, Sarawak dan W.P. Labuan
Figure 4.2 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Coastal at Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan
120 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
PERLIS
KEDAH
P. PINANG
KELANTAN
TERENGGANU
PERAK
PAHANG
SELANGOR
W.P. KUALA LUMPUR
W.P. PUTRAJAYA
STATUS KUALITI AIR MARIN /
N. SEMBILAN
MARINE WATER QUALITY STATUS
MELAKA
Terbaik / Excellent
JOHOR
Baik / Good
Sederhana / Moderate
Rajah 4.3 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Muara Sungai di Semenanjung Malaysia
Figure 4.3 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Estuary at Peninsular Malaysia
Terbaik / Excellent
Baik / Good
Sederhana / Moderate
W.P. LABUAN SABAH
Tercemar / Poor
SARAWAK
0 100 km 200 km
Rajah 4.4 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Muara Sungai di Sabah dan Sarawak
Figure 4.4 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Estuary at Sabah and Sarawak
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 121
PERLIS
KEDAH
P. PINANG
KELANTAN
TERENGGANU
PERAK
PAHANG
SELANGOR
W.P. KUALA LUMPUR
STATUS KUALITI AIR MARIN / W.P. PUTRAJAYA
MARINE WATER QUALITY STATUS
N. SEMBILAN
Baik / Good
JOHOR
Sederhana / Moderate
Rajah 4.5 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Pulau di Semenanjung Malaysia
Figure 4.5 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Island at Peninsular Malaysia
Terbaik / Excellent
Sederhana / Moderate
W.P. LABUAN SABAH
Tercemar / Poor
SARAWAK
0 100 km 200 km
Rajah 4.6 : Status Kualiti Air Marine mengikut Lokasi Stesen Pengawasan bagi Pulau di Sabah, Sarawak dan W.P. Labuan
Figure 4.6 : Marine Water Quality Status based on the Location Monitoring Stations for Island at Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan
122 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Sebanyak 188 stesen pantai dipantau pada tahun A total of 188 coastal stations were monitored for water
2020. Daripada 188 stesen pantai, 55 stesen (29.26%) quality in 2020. Of this number, 55 stations (29.26%) were
terbaik, 41 stesen (21.81%) baik, 88 stesen (46.81%) ranked excellent, 41 (21.81%) ranked good, 88 stations
sederhana manakala empat (4) stesen (2.13%) tercemar (46.81%) ranked moderate while four (4) stations (2.13%)
(Jadual 4.6). were ranked poor (Table 4.6).
Pantai Cherating
4133903 (A) MMCC001 60 92 94 88 91 Terbaik / Excellent
(Club Med A)
Pantai Cherating
4133903 (B) MMCC002 61 93 94 85 94 Terbaik / Excellent
(Club Med B)
Pantai Cherating
4133942 (A) MMCC003 81 92 94 88 96 Terbaik / Excellent
(Legend A)
Pantai Cherating
4133942 (B) MMCC004 61 89 94 94 96 Terbaik / Excellent
(Legend B)
Pantai Muhibbah Balok A 3933901 (A) MMCC005 58 68 89 59 73 Sederhana / Moderate
Nota / Note:
* (Stesen baru / New station)
** (Stesen tutup / Station closed)
– (Tiada data / No data)
NA (Tidak berkenaan / Not available)
128 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Rajah 4.7 menunjukkan status kualiti air marin bagi Figure 4.7 depicts the trend of marine water quality
pantai berdasarkan IKAMM. Bilangan stesen terbaik status for islands based on MMWQI. The number of
meningkat daripada 37 stesen pada tahun 2019 kepada excellent stations increased from 37 stations in 2019 to
55 stesen pada tahun 2020; Walau bagaimanapun stesen 55 stations in 2020; Nevertheless, the number of good
dengan status kualiti air baik menurun daripada 69 stesen water quality stations decreased from 69 stations in 2019
pada tahun 2019 kepada 41 stesen pada tahun 2020. to 41 stations in 2020.
140
124
120
103
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
100
88
80 79
70 69
60
60 56 55
41
40 37 37
31 27
20 16
2 2 3 4
0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Rajah 4.7 : Tren Status Kualiti Air Marin bagi Kawasan Pantai, 2016-2020
Terbaik / Baik / Sederhana / Tercemar /
Figure 4.7 : The Trend ofGood
Excellent Marine Water Quality Status for Coastal Area,Poor
Moderate 2016-2020
Rajah 4.1: Tren Status Kualiti Air Marin bagi Kawasan Pantai, 2015 - 2019
Figure 4.1: The Trend of Marine Water Quality Status for Coastal Area, 2015 - 2019
STATUS KUALITI AIR MUARA SUNGAI ESTUARY WATER QUALITY STATUS
Sebanyak 85 stesen muara sungai dipantau pada tahun A total of 85 estuary stations were monitored in the year
2020. Daripada 85 stesen pengawasan bagi muara 2020 and of this number, three (3) stations (3.53%) were
sungai, tiga (3) stesen (3.53%) terbaik, enam (6) stesen ranked excellent, six (6) stations (7.06%) were ranked good,
(7.06%) baik, 63 stesen (74.12%) sederhana manakala 13 63 stations (74.12%) were moderate, while the remaining
stesen (15.29%) tercemar (Jadual 4.7). 13 stations (15.29%) were ranked poor (Table 4.7).
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 129
Pulau Muara Sungai / Kuala Sungai Pinang 5403934 MMPE004 58 52 61 52 53 Sederhana / Moderate
Pinang Estuary
Kuala Sungai Perai 5303908 MMPE005 64 52 59 53 43 Tercemar / Poor
Stesen tutup/
Kuala Sungai Melayu 1437946 - 58 63 - - -
Close station
Stesen tutup/
Kuala Sungai Skudai 1437922 - 65 40 - - -
Close station
Stesen tutup/
Kuala Sungai Tebrau 1438943 - 56 62 - - -
Close station
Kuala Sungai
5331907 MMTE008 55 66 67 59 59 Sederhana / Moderate
Terengganu
Kuala Sungai Kemaman /
4234929 MMTE009 56 90 94 59 60 Sederhana / Moderate
Chukai
Tioxide Utara
4234950 MMTE010 63 89 94 95 94 Terbaik / Excellent
Muara Sungai / (Kg. Bukit Kuang, Kijal)
Terengganu
Estuary Tioxide Tengah
4234951 MMTE011 61 90 94 94 87 Baik / Good
(Pupuk Semangat, Kijal)
Tioxide Selatan
4234952 MMTE012 - 94 94 85 94 Terbaik / Excellent
(KSB, T. Kalong)
Pulau Duyung 5231908 MMTE013 57 66 66 58 59 Sederhana / Moderate
Nota / Note:
* (Stesen baru / New station)
** (Stesen tutup / Station closed)
– (Tiada data / No data)
NA (Tidak berkenaan / Not available)
132 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Rajah 4.8 menunjukkan tren status kualiti air marin Figure 4.8 shows the trend of marine water quality
bagi muara sungai berdasarkan IKAMM. Bilangan stesen status for estuaries based on MMWQI. The number of
terbaik adalah sama iaitu tiga (3) stesen pada tahun stations ranked excellent remain the same number, three
2019 dan tahun 2020 manakala bilangan stesen baik (3) as in 2019 and 2020, whereas the number of stations
berkurang daripada 13 stesen pada tahun 2019 kepada ranked good decreased from 13 stations in 2019 to six (6)
enam (6) stesen pada tahun 2020. stations in 2020.
70
63
60 58
54
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
50 47
41
40
30
23 21
20 18
12 15 13 13
11
10 6 5
4 6
3 3 3
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Rajah 4.8 : Tren Status Kualiti Air Marin bagi Muara Sungai, 2016-2020
Figure 4.8 : The Trend of Marine Water Quality Status for Estuaries, 2016-2020
Sebanyak 95 stesen pengawasan kualiti air marin bagi A total of 95 island water quality monitoring stations
Tahun / Year
pulau dibangunkan yang meliputi 80 pulau yang telah were established surrounding 80 islands and were
dipantau pada tahun 2020./ Jadual 4.8 Baik
Terbaik menunjukkan
/ monitored 2020. Table
Sederhanain/the year Tercemar / 4.8 shows the list of
Excellent
senarai stesen pengawasan Good
kualiti air marin bagi pulau. Moderate
island Poor
water quality monitoring stations. Out of the 95
Daripada 95 stesen pengawasan, 46 stesen (48.42%) island monitoring stations, 46 (48.42%) ranked excellent,
Rajah 4.2: Tren Status Kualiti Air Marin bagi Kawasan Muara Sungai, 2015 - 2019
terbaik,Figure
sembilan
4.2:(9)The
stesen (9.47%)
Trend baik, manakala
of Marine 39 nine
Water Quality (9) stations
Status (9.47%) Area,
for Estuary ranked2015
good, -while
2019the remaining
stesen (41.05%) sederhana dan satu (1) stesen (1.05%) 39 stations (41.05%) ranked moderate and one (1) station
tercemar pada tahun 2020 (Jadual 4.9). (1.05%) was ranked poor in 2020 (Table 4.9).
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 133
Jadual 4.8 : Stesen-Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Pulau, 2020
Table 4.8 : Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations for Island, 2020
BILANGAN BILANGAN ID STESEN ID STESEN
NEGERI / PULAU / STESEN / PULAU / LAMA / BARU / KATEGORI /
STATE NUMBER OF NUMBER OF ISLAND OLD STATION NEW STATION CATEGORY
ISLAND STATION ID ID
Jadual 4.8 : Stesen-Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Pulau, 2020
Table 4.8 : Island Water Quality Monitoring Stations, 2020
Jadual 4.8 : Stesen-Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin bagi Pulau, 2020
Table 4.8 : Island Water Quality Monitoring Stations, 2020
Nota / Note:
* (Stesen baru / New station)
** (Stesen tutup / Station closed)
– (Tiada data / No data)
NA (Tidak berkenaan / Not available)
136 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Pulau
Pulau / Island Aman 7PR05 MMPR001 72 72 88 60 72 Sederhana / Moderate
Pinang
Jerejak 7PR06 MMPR002 46 57 65 57 58 Sederhana / Moderate
Nota / Note:
* (Stesen baru / New station)
** (Stesen tutup / Station closed)
– (Tiada data / No data)
NA (Tidak berkenaan / Not available)
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 139
Rajah 4.9 menunjukkan tren status kualiti air marin Figure 4.9 displays the trend of marine water quality
bagi pulau berdasarkan IKAMM. Bilangan stesen sebagai status for islands based on MMWQI. The number of
terbaik meningkat daripada 34 stesen pada tahun 2019 stations ranked excellent increased from 34 in 2019 to
kepada 46 stesen pada tahun 2020 manakala stesen 46 stations in 2020. The number of stations considered
sebagai baik berkurang daripada 33 stesen pada tahun good, though, decreased from 33 in 2019 to nine (9)
2019 kepada sembilan (9) stesen pada tahun 2020. stations in 2020.
90
82
80
70
Bilangan Stesen / Number of Stations
60
50 49 47 46
40 39
33 34 33
31
30 27
20 17
10 8 9
6 5
2 1 1
0 0 0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Tahun / Year
Terbaik / Baik / Sederhana / Tercemar /
Excellent Good Moderate Poor
Rajah 4.3: Tren Status Kualiti Air Marin bagi Kawasan Pulau, 2015 - 2019
Figure 4.3: The Trend of Marine Water Quality Status for Island Area, 2015 - 2019
Pulau Tioman
140 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
Jadual 4.10 menunjukkan terdapat 18 stesen marin Table 4.10 shows the list of 18 marine stations that were
tercemar iaitu empat (4) stesen pantai, 13 stesen muara ranked poor. Of these, four (4) were coastal stations,
sungai dan satu (1) stesen pulau. Unjuran peratusan sub- 13 estuary stations and one (1) island station. Sub-index
indeks adalah dengan menggunakan skala 0 hingga projection percentages are used on a scale of 0 to
100%. Sub-indeks yang memberikan nilai 49% dan ke 100%. A sub-index of 49% and below is a benchmark
bawah dijadikan sebagai tanda aras yang ditandakan and marked in red and indicates a decline in MMWQI.
warna merah bermaksud kemerosotan pada IKAMM.
Jadual ini juga menunjukkan semua stesen marin yang The table also shows that this degradation is primarily
mengalami kemerosotan adalah disebabkan oleh due to faecal coliform (FC) parameters. In addition,
parameter faecal coliform (FC). Selain itu, oksigen terlarut dissolved oxygen (DO), total suspended solids (TSS),
(DO), jumlah pepejal terampai, fosfat (PO4) dan nitrat phosphate (PO4) and nitrate (NO3) also have had a slight
(NO3) juga turut mempengaruhi nilai IKAMM. impact on the value of MMWQI.
Stesen muara sungai di Kuala Sungai Juru, Pulau The estuary station of Kuala Sungai Juru, Pulau Pinang
Pinang adalah stesen yang menerima kesan terbanyak was most impacted by all three (3) parameters, while the
daripada tiga (3) parameter, manakala stesen yang lain other stations were mostly impacted by one (1) or two (2)
kebanyakannya terkesan daripada satu (1) atau dua (2) parameters only.
parameter sahaja.
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Pulau kecil berhampiran Kampung Paya, Pulau Tioman / A small island near Kampung Payar, Tioman Island
Jadual 4.10 : Senarai Stesen Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin dengan Status Kategori Tercemar dan Peratusan Sub-Indeks mengikut Parameter, 2020
Table 4.10 : List of Marine Water Quality Monitoring Stations under the Category of Poor Status and their Sub-Index Percentages by Parameter, 2020
PERATUSAN SUB INDEKS (%) / SUB INDEX PERCENTAGES (%)
KLASIFIKASI KATEGORI
NEGERI / STESEN / LOKASI / ID STESEN / IKAMM / IKAMM / OKSIGEN AMONIA TIDAK JUMLAH PEPEJAL
STATE STATION LOCATION STATION ID MMWQI MMWQI TERLARUT / TERION / FAECAL TERAMPAI / NITRAT / FOSFAT /
CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY DISSOLVED UNIONIZED COLIFORM TOTAL SUSPENDED NITRATE PHOSPHATE
OXYGEN AMMONIA SOLID
Pulau Pinang Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Jawi MMPE001 38 Tercemar / Poor 52 78 8 84 90 40
Pulau Pinang Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Juru MMPE002 30 Tercemar / Poor 10 82 8 87 73 10
Pulau Pinang Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Perai MMPE005 43 Tercemar / Poor 30 92 8 92 74 89
Perak Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Sepetang MMAE005 48 Tercemar / Poor 74 99 8 78 63 82
Selangor Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Klang MMBE005 35 Tercemar / Poor 10 88 8 90 83 66
Kuala Sungai Langat
Selangor Muara Sungai / Estuary MMBE006 45 Tercemar / Poor 46 96 8 90 66 77
(Lumut)
Selangor Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Selangor MMBE008 45 Tercemar / Poor 65 98 8 42 56 88
Selangor Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Tengi MMBE009 43 Tercemar / Poor 78 98 8 47 74 91
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY
Johor Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Segget MMJE001 41 Tercemar / Poor 81 88 8 94 41 53
Johor Muara Sungai / Estuary Kuala Sungai Laloh MMJE002 42 Tercemar / Poor 10 95 8 94 90 81
PENGAWASAN KUALITI AIR MARIN AUTOMATIK CONTINUOUS MARINE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
Rangkaian Pengawasan Kualiti Air Marin Automatik The Continuous Marine Water Quality Monitoring
(CMWQM) bertujuan untuk menyediakan data kualiti (CMWQM) network aims to provide near real-time
air marin hampir pada waktu sebenar bagi sepuluh (10) marine water quality data in ten (10) designated locations.
lokasi stesen yang ditetapkan.
Jadual 4.11 menyenaraikan lokasi stesen-stesen Table 4.11 lists the location of the continuous marine
pengawasan kualiti air marin automatik dan kategori water quality monitoring stations and its respective class
kelas kegunaan air marin berdasarkan SKAMM manakala categories based on MMWQS while Figure 4.10 shows
Rajah 4.10 menunjukkan lokasi Stesen Pengawasan the location of the Continuous Marine Water Quality
Kualiti Air Marin Automatik (CMWQM). Monitoring (CMWQM) stations.
CM13T CM10S
P. PINANG W.P. LABUAN SABAH
KELANTAN
PERAK TERENGGANU
CM12A
PAHANG
SELANGOR
W.P. KUALA LUMPUR
W.P. PUTRAJAYA
N. SEMBILAN
CM03N
MELAKA
JOHOR SARAWAK
CM02M
CM11Q
CM04J CM05J
BASEMAP
km
0 40 80 160 240 320 400
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY
Pada tahun 2020, kualiti air marin menerima kesan dari In 2020, the marine water quality received impacts from
fenomena La Nina dan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan the La Nina phenomena and the Movement Control
(PKP) yang ditetapkan oleh Kerajaan untuk mencegah Order (MCO) by Government to curb the spread of
penularan wabak COVID-19. Fenomena La Nina COVID-19 pandemic. The La Nina phenomena affected
telah mempengaruhi corak hujan yang akhirnya the rainfall pattern which eventually influenced the
mempengaruhi tahap input sungai ke persekitaran degree of riverine inputs to the marine environment in
marin dalam taburan temporal dan spatial. both temporal and spatial distribution.
Kepekatan median dan purata bagi rata-rata parameter The average and median concentration of all water quality
yang dipantau dalam rangkaian CMWQM menunjukkan parameters monitored in the CMWQM network showed
pematuhan tinggi bagi setiap kelas kualiti air marin high conformance to their respective marine water quality
sepertimana yang ditetapkan dalam SKAMM. classes as stipulated in the MMWQS.
Stesen CMWQM iaitu CM11Q Santubong, CM05J Tanjung CMWQM Stations, CM11Q Santubong, CM05J Tanjung
Pengelih dan CM12A Pulau Mentagor yang terletak Pengelih and CM12A Pulau Mentagor that are located
berdekatan muara sungai dipengaruhi oleh pasang surut air nearby river mouths are affected by tide. During low tide,
ketika terdapat pengaliran air sungai yang mempengaruhi influent of riverine discharge affects the water quality
parameter kualiti air. Kualiti air marin di stesen CMWQM parameters. In addition, the marine water quality of
juga dipengaruhi oleh kadar presipitasi di kawasan tersebut CMWQM stations also subject to the rate of precipitation
terutamanya ketika musim Monsun Timur Laut. in the area especially during the North East Monsoon.
Pada tahun 2020, paras oksigen terlarut yang direkodkan In 2020, the level of dissolved oxygen (DO) recorded
di kesemua stesen CMWQM menunjukkan peratusan in all the CMWQM stations showed high degree of
pematuhan yang tinggi (>90%) terhadap SKAMM conformance (>90%) to their respective MMWQS except
kecuali CM13T Pulau Kapas, CM12A Pulau Mentagor for CM13T Pulau Kapas, Terengganu, CM12A Pulau
dan CM11Q Santubong. Tahap oksigen terlarut yang Mentagor, Perak and CM11Q at Santubong. The low
rendah berkemungkinan disebabkan oleh akumulasi dissolved oxygen maybe related to the accumulation of
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
bahan-bahan organik di dasar laut yang mengurangkan the organic matters in the sea bottom which depleted
oksigen terlarut apabila pengaliran air laut adalah terhad the dissolved oxygen when the sea current movement
atau arus hidrologi minimum. CM11Q menunjukkan is subtle and limited or when the hydrological flow is
peratusan pematuhan oksigen terlarut yang rendah pada minimum. CM11Q reported the lowest percentage of DO
tahun 2020. CM11Q terletak di muara sungai Santubong compliance in 2020. CM11Q which is located within the
dan dipengaruhi oleh air pasang surut. Ketika air surut, Santubong river estuary is affected by tide. During low
pengaliran air di muara sungai adalah rendah dan oksigen tide, when the water flow within the estuary is low, the
terlarut berkurangan dengan cepat yang memberi kesan dissolved oxygen in the water could be depleted rapidly
kepada kepekatan oksigen terlarut yang rendah. resulting in low concentration of dissolved oxygen.
Pada tahun 2020, tidak terdapat sebarang pencemaran Throughout 2020, there was no pollution alert triggered
yang disebabkan oleh jumlah pepejal terampai (TSS). by total suspended solids (TSS). Most of the CMWQM
Kebanyakan stesen CMWQM menunjukkan pematuhan stations showed high conformance to the MMWQS in
yang tinggi terhadap SKAMM. Secara purata, kepekatan relation to their water quality objective. On average, TSS
TSS lebih tinggi di CM04J Tanjung Piai dan CM05J Tanjung concentration at CM04J Tanjung Piai and CM05J Tanjung
Pengelih berbanding dengan stesen CMWQM yang lain Pengelih were reported to be higher than other CMWQM
pada tahun ini. stations in this year.
MARINE AND ISLAND MARINE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER 4 145
Terdapat insiden tumpahan minyak yang dilaporkan kira-kira An oil spill incident was reported near CM03N at
15 km dari stesen CM03N Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan iaitu Pantai Cermin in October 2020, about 15km away
di Pantai Cermin pada Oktober 2020. Parameter Polycyclic from the CM03N Port Dickson. The Polycyclic Aromatic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) yang dilaporkan di stesen Hydrocarbons (PAHs) parameter reported at the station
tersebut semasa tumpahan minyak bertindak balas terhadap during the oil spill was a response to the incident; however
kejadian itu, namun tahap PAH yang dikesan masih di the level of PAHs detected was still below the stipulated
bawah standard yang ditetapkan. Oleh itu, tidak ada amaran standards. Hence no pollution alert was triggered from
pencemaran yang dilaporkan daripada stesen tersebut. the station.
Tiada amaran pencemaran yang dijana oleh rangkaian There were no pollution warnings generated under the
CMWQM pada tahun 2020. Secara keseluruhan, tahap CMWQM network in 2020. Overall, the status of marine
kualiti air marin yang dipantau di bawah rangkaian water quality monitored under the CMWQM network
CMWQM adalah dianggap baik. received was good.
Jadual 4.12 menunjukkan tahap pematuhan stesen Table 4.12 shows the status of CMWQM stations were
CMWQM terhadap kelas masing-masing pada tahun 2020. in compliance with their respective classes in 2020.
Pematuhan parameter kualiti air marin berdasarkan Compliance to the marine water quality parameters in
SKAMM bagi kesemua stesen CMWQM untuk jumlah relation to the MMWQS for all CMWQM stations for TSS
pepejal terampai dan PAH adalah tinggi (> 90%) pada and PAHs were high (>90%) in 2020.
tahun 2020.
Jadual 4.12 : Peratusan Pematuhan Parameter Oksigen Terlarut, Jumlah Pepejal Terampai dan PAH mengikut Kelas Stesen
Table 4.12 : Percentage of Dissolved Oxygen, Total Suspended Solid and PAH’s Parameters Compliance according to Their Station Classes
PERATUSAN PEMATUHAN (%)/
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE (%)
NEGERI / LOKASI STESEN / ID STESEN / KELAS / KEPEKATAN OKSIGEN JUMLAH PEPEJAL POLYCYCLIC
STATE STATION LOCATION STATION ID CLASS TERLARUT / TERAMPAI / AROMATIC
DISSOLVED OXYGEN TOTAL SUSPENDED HYDROCARBONS
(DO) CONCENTRATION SOLID (TSS) (PAHS)
Melaka Jeti Pulau Undan CM02M Kelas 2 / Class 2 100% 99.95% 100%1**
W.P. Labuan W.P. Labuan CM10S Kelas 3 / Class 3 99.99% 100% 100%2**
Nota:
1
Berdasarkan data 11 bulan
2
Berdasarkan data 10 bulan
3
Berdasarkan data 7 bulan
4
Berdasarkan data 4 bulan
**Data PAHs dipengaruhi oleh peratusan (%) kepatuhan berdasarkan tempoh di mana data tersedia.
146 BAB 4 KUALITI AIR MARIN DAN PULAU-PULAU
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Sebuah pulau di luar pantai Melaka / An island off the coast of Melaka
AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 1 147
BAB 5
CHAPTER 5
Sungai merupakan antara ekosistem utama yang Rivers are one of the ecosystems that have the
mempunyai keupayaan asimilasi untuk mengurangkan assimilative capacity to reduce the impacts from pollution
kesan pencemaran melalui proses daripada penguraian, through the processes of degradation, dispersion and
penyebaran dan pelarutan. Namun begitu, keupayaan ini dilution. However, this capacity has its limitations and
ada batas dan sekiranya ia melebihi, kemerosotan kualiti once exceeded, it will cause the quality of the river to
air sungai akan terjadi. deteriorate.
Keupayaan asimilasi sungai ini amat berkait rapat This assimilative capacity is co-related to the water
dengan beban pencemaran yang ditakrifkan sebagai pollution load which is defined as concentration of
kepekatan bahan cemar yang dibawa oleh jasad air pada pollutants carried by a body of water at a given time.
sesuatu masa yang diberikan. Beban pencemaran ini Pollution load is influenced by the water body flow
dipengaruhi oleh faktor kadar alir jasad air tersebut dan rate and the concentration of pollutants carried by the
juga kepekatan bahan cemar yang dibawa. water body.
Beban pencemaran air adalah kriteria penting bertujuan Water pollution load is one of the important criteria in
untuk mengatur strategi dan merancang tindakan prioritizing strategies and planning the mode of action for
pencegahan dan mengawal pencemaran. Pelaksanaan pollution prevention and control. The implementation
kawalan beban pencemaran air adalah usaha untuk of the pollution load control is one of the efforts to
meningkatkan kualiti air sungai demi mengekalkan enhance the river water quality in order to maintain the
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
pelbagai kegunaan berfaedah sungai seperti sumber beneficial uses of a river as a source of water supply,
bekalan air, rekreasi, ternakair (akuakultur), pertanian recreation, aquaculture, agriculture as well as to sustain
serta menampung keperluan sistem ekologi. the needs of the ecological system.
Punca beban pencemaran air terbahagi kepada dua Sources of water pollution load can be divided into
(2) kategori utama, iaitu punca tetap dan punca tidak two (2) main categories which are point sources and
tetap. Punca tetap beban pencemaran air adalah non-point sources. Point sources can be described as
punca-punca yang mempunyai takat pelepasan yang pollution sources that have specific identifiable discharge
boleh dikenalpasti dan tidak berubah dalam masa yang points which are unchanged over time. Sectors such as
singkat seperti sektor industri, ternakan, sistem rawatan industry, livestock and sewage treatment system fall
kumbahan dan sebagainya. under this category.
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 149
Manakala punca tidak tetap seperti aktiviti pertanian, Meanwhile the non-point sources such agricultural
kerja tanah, perlombongan dan kumbahan bukan najis activities, earthworks, mining, and sullage (domestic
(air cucian dapur dan bilik air selain kumbahan) tidak wastewater other than sewage such as kitchen and
mempunyai takat pelepasan yang tetap dan sering bathroom wastewater) do not have specific identifiable
berubah-ubah yang menyukarkan anggaran pelepasan discharge points and the locations are varied over time.
beban pencemaran dibuat. Kajian berkaitan beban This makes it difficult to estimate the amount of released
pencemaran di bawah kategori ini bagi Malaysia tidak pollution loads. Studies on this particular category for
banyak dibuat dan tersedia untuk rujukan buat masa ini. Malaysia are currently not widely available for reference.
Untuk tahun 2020, sebanyak lima (5) jenis punca For the year of 2020, this report focusses on five (5) types of
pencemaran air ditumpukan dalam pelaporan status water pollution load sources which are the manufacturing
beban pencemaran air, iaitu industri pembuatan, industri industries, agricultural-based industries, sewage treatment
berasaskan pertanian, loji rawatan kumbahan, ternakan plants, pig farming and wet markets.
babi dan pasar basah.
Sumber data industri pembuatan dan industri The source of data for manufacturing industries and
berasaskan pertanian diperolehi daripada Jabatan agricultural-based industries were provided by the
Alam Sekitar (JAS) Negeri manakala bagi loji rawatan Department of Environment (DOE) State offices while
kumbahan adalah daripada pihak operator loji seperti data for sewage treatment plants were obtained
Indah Water Konsortium Sdn. Bhd. dan pihak berkuasa from Indah Water Konsortium Sdn. Bhd. and the local
tempatan. Data-data berkaitan aktiviti ternakan babi authority. All data regarding pig farming were provided
diperolehi daripada Jabatan Perkhidmatan Veterinar dan by the Department of Veterinary Services and data on
Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan pula wet markets were acquired from the Ministry of Housing
membekalkan data bilangan pasar basah. and Local Government.
Pengiraan beban pencemaran ditumpukan kepada Calculations on pollution load are mainly focused on
Pada tahun 2020, anggaran jumlah beban pencemaran In the year 2020, an estimated BOD pollution load of
BOD terhasil adalah sebanyak 680.75 tan/hari. Pelepasan 680.75 tonnes/day was generated. Sewage treatment
daripada loji rawatan kumbahan adalah penyumbang plants remain the largest BOD load contributor with a
beban pencemaran BOD tertinggi iaitu sebanyak total load of 401.10 tonnes/day (58.92%), followed by
401.10 tan/hari (58.92%), diikuti dengan aktiviti ternakan pig farming activities which contributed 223.08 tonnes/
babi 223.08 tan/hari (32.77%), industri berasaskan day (32.77%), agriculture-based industries 27.45 tonnes/
pertanian 27.45 tan/hari (4.03%), industri pembuatan day (4.03%), manufacturing industries 23.94 tonnes/
23.94 tan/hari (3.52%) dan pasar basah 5.18 tan/hari day (3.52%) and wet markets 5.18 tonnes/ day (0.76%)
(0.76%) (Rajah 5.1). (Figure 5.1).
4.03%
Ternakan Babi / Pig Farming
223.08 Tan/Hari (Tonnes/Day)
32.77%
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.1 : Anggaran Beban BOD (Tan/Hari) mengikut Punca Pencemaran Air, 2020
Figure 5.1 : Estimation of BOD Load (Tonnes/Day) by Sources of Water Pollution, 2020
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 151
Pada tahun 2020, anggaran jumlah beban pencemaran The overall estimation in the year 2020 for SS load was
bagi SS adalah sebanyak 1373.08 tan/hari. Jumlah beban 1373.08 tonnes/day. Total pollution load from sewage
pencemaran daripada loji rawatan kumbahan berada di treatment plant shows the highest load 473.17 tonnes/
tangga teratas sebanyak 473.17 tan/hari (34.46%) diikuti day (34.46%) followed by pig farming activities with
dengan ternakan babi 463.32 tan/hari (33.74%). Industri 463.32 tonnes/day (33.74%). Agriculture-based industries
berasaskan pertanian pula adalah sebanyak 400.16 tan/hari contributed 400.16 tonnes/day (29.14%), followed by
(29.14%), industri pembuatan 29.74 tan/hari (2.17%) dan manufacturing industries 29.74 tonnes/day (2.17%), and
pasar basah 6.69 tan/hari (0.49%) (Rajah 5.2). wet markets 6.69 tonnes/day (0.49%) (Figure 5.2).
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.2 : Anggaran Beban SS (Tan/Hari) mengikut Punca Pencemaran Air, 2020
Figure 5.2 : Estimation of SS Load (Tonnes/Day) by Sources of Water Pollution, 2020
152 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Pada tahun 2020, anggaran beban pencemar AN In year 2020, the AN load was estimated to be 280.77
adalah sebanyak 280.77 tan/hari di mana pelepasan tonnes/day in which sewage treatment plant remained
loji rawatan kumbahan adalah penyumbang terbesar the largest contributor with a total load of 231.10 tonnes/
beban AN dengan jumlah sebanyak 231.10 tan/hari day (82.31%), followed by pig farming activities with
(82.31%), diikuti aktiviti ternakan babi iaitu 27.46 tan/hari 27.46 tonnes/day (9.78%), agriculture-based industries
(9.78%), industri berasaskan pertanian 17.85 tan/hari 17.85 tonnes/day (6.36%), manufacturing industries 4.07
(6.36%), industri pembuatan 4.07 tan/hari (1.45%) dan tonnes/day (1.45%) and wet markets 0.29 tonnes/day
pasar basah 0.29 tan/hari (0.10%) (Rajah 5.3). (0.10%) (Figure 5.3).
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.3 : Anggaran Beban AN (Tan/Hari) mengikut Punca Pencemaran Air, 2020
Figure 5.3 : Assessment of AN Load (Tonnes/Day) by Sources of Water Pollution, 2020
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 153
Beban Pencemaran Keperluan Oksigen Biokimia Biochemical Oxygen Demand Load by States
mengikut Negeri
Pada tahun 2020, anggaran penghasilan beban BOD In the year 2020, the estimation of BOD loads generated
di Johor adalah tertinggi iaitu sebanyak 155.00 tan/hari, in Johor was recorded to be the highest with a value of
Perak 110.72 tan/hari, Selangor 85.52 tan/hari, 155.00 tonnes/day, followed by Perak 110.72 tonnes/day,
Sarawak 80.82 tan/hari, Sabah 65.65 tan/hari dan Selangor 85.52 tonnes/day, Sarawak 80.82 tonnes/day,
Pulau Pinang 64.36 tan/hari. Beban BOD untuk Sabah 65.65 tonnes/day and Pulau Pinang 64.36 tonnes/day.
lain-lain negeri termasuk Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan BOD load for the rest of the states including Federal
dan Putrajaya adalah kurang daripada 22.54 tan/hari. Territory of Labuan and Putrajaya generated less than
Beban pencemar BOD mengikut negeri ditunjukkan 22.54 tonnes/day. BOD pollution load based on states is
pada Rajah 5.4. shown in Figure 5.4.
180
160
140
120
100
Tan/Hari (Tonnes/Day)
80
60
20
0
Perak
Sarawak
Sabah
P. Pinang
Kedah
Terengganu
Pahang
Melaka
N. Sembilan
Perlis
Kelantan
Labuan
Putrajaya
Johor
Selangor
K. Lumpur
Negeri / State
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.4 : Taburan Anggaran Beban BOD (Tan/Hari) dan Punca Pencemaran Air mengikut Negeri, 2020
Figure 5.4 : Dispersions of BOD Load (Tonnes/Day) Assessment and Sources of Water Pollution by States, 2020
154 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Beban Pencemaran Pepejal Terampai mengikut Negeri Suspended Solids Load by States
Anggaran penghasilan beban SS di Johor adalah tertinggi The estimated SS load generated in Johor was recorded to
iaitu sebanyak 558.99 tan/hari, diikuti Perak 192.61 tan/hari, be the highest with a value of 558.99 tonnes/day, followed
Selangor 142.57 tan/hari, Pulau Pinang 122.59 tan/hari by Perak 192.61 tonnes/day, Selangor 142.57 tonnes/day,
dan Sabah 105.49 tan/hari. Beban SS untuk lain-lain negeri Pulau Pinang 122.59, and Sabah 105.49. The SS load for
termasuk Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan dan Putrajaya the rest of the states including Federal Territory of Labuan
adalah kurang daripada 99.55 tan/hari. Beban pencemar and Putrajaya generated less than 99.55 tonnes/day.
SS mengikut negeri ditunjukkan pada Rajah 5.5. SS pollution loads at the state level is shown in Figure 5.5.
600
500
400
Tan/Hari (Tonnes/Day)
300
200
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
100
0
Perak
P. Pinang
Sabah
Sarawak
K. Lumpur
Melaka
Kedah
N. Sembilan
Terengganu
Kelantan
Perlis
Labuan
Putrajaya
Johor
Selangor
Pahang
Negeri / State
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.5 : Taburan Anggaran Beban SS (Tan/Hari) dan Punca Pencemaran Air mengikut Negeri, 2020
Figure 5.5 : Dispersions of SS Load (Tonnes/Day) Assessment and Sources of Water Pollution by States, 2020
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Asas Pertanian / Loji Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 155
Anggaran penghasilan beban AN di Johor adalah The estimated AN loads generated in Johor was
tertinggi iaitu sebanyak 60.06 tan/hari, diikuti Sabah recorded to be the highest with a value of 60.06
39.41 tan/hari, Selangor 39.09 tan/hari, Perak 32.46 tan/hari, tonnes/day, followed by Sabah at 39.41 tonnes/day,
dan Sarawak 32.23 tan/hari. Beban AN untuk lain-lain Selangor 39.09 tonnes/day, Perak 32.46 tonnes/day and
negeri termasuk Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan dan Sarawak 32.23 tonnes/day. The AN load for the rest of the
Putrajaya adalah kurang daripada 18.10 tan/hari. states including Federal Territory of Labuan and Putrajaya
Beban pencemar AN mengikut negeri ditunjukkan pada generated less than 18.10 tonnes/day. AN pollution load
Rajah 5.6. based on states is shown in Figure 5.6.
70
60
50
Tan/Hari (Tonnes/Day)
40
30
20
0
Perak
Sarawak
P. Pinang
Kedah
K. Lumpur
N. Sembilan
Melaka
Terengganu
Perlis
Kelantan
Sabah
Labuan
Putrajaya
Pahang
Johor
Selangor
Negeri / State
Industri Pembuatan / Industri Berasaskan Pertanian / Loji Rawatan Kumbahan / Ternakan Babi / Pasar Basah /
Manufacturing Industries Agriculture-based Industries Sewage Treatment Plant Pig Farming Wet Market
Rajah 5.6 : Taburan Anggaran Beban AN (Tan/Hari) dan Punca Pencemaran Air mengikut Negeri, 2020
Figure 5.6 : Dispersions of AN Load (Tonnes/Day) Assessment and Sources of Water Pollution by States, 2020
156 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Peningkatan punca industri dan bilangan kenderaan The increase in industrial sources and numbers of motor
bermotor boleh menyebabkan pencemaran udara yang vehicles could cause severe air pollution if the emissions
teruk jika pelepasan pencemar termasuk pelepasan asap of pollutants, including smoke emission, from both
daripada kedua-dua aktiviti ini tidak dikawal dengan sources are not effectively controlled.
berkesan.
Sehingga Disember 2020, jumlah punca industri yang As at December 2020, a total of 13,776 industrial
melepaskan bahan pencemar ke udara adalah sebanyak sources were emitting air pollutants. The highest
13,776. Bilangan punca pencemar yang tertinggi adalah pollution sources were in Selangor (2,867:21) followed
di Selangor (2,867:21) diikuti Johor (2,434:18) dan Perak by Johor (2434:18) and Perak (1,557:11) as indicated in
(1,557:11) seperti ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 5.7. Figure 5.7.
Pada tahun 2020, terdapat peningkatan bagi jumlah In 2020, there was an increase in the overall number
keseluruhan kenderaan bermotor yang berdaftar. of registered motor vehicles. The number of registered
Bilangan teksi dan kenderaan sewa pandu sendiri yang taxis and self-driven rental vehicles increased by 4.36%,
berdaftar meningkat sebanyak 4.36%, diikuti dengan followed by an increase of 3.51% in passenger cars, 3.82%
kenderaan penumpang meningkat sebanyak 3.51%, in motorcycles, 2.31% in freight vehicles, and 0.70%
motosikal sebanyak 3.82%, kenderaan barangan in buses compared to 2019. The number of registered
sebanyak 2.31%, dan bas sebanyak 0.70% berbanding vehicles in Malaysia as reported by the Road Transport
dengan tahun 2019. Bilangan kenderaan bermotor yang Department for 2019 and 2020 is shown in Figure 5.8.
berdaftar yang direkodkan oleh Jabatan Pengangkutan The number of registered in-use (active) vehicles
Jalan pada tahun 2019 dan 2020 adalah seperti yang increased by 2.52% compared to 2019. The number of
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 5.8. Jumlah kenderaan passenger vehicles increased by 2.57%, taxis decreased
berdaftar yang sedang digunakan (aktif ) meningkat by 5.11% and motorcycles increased by 2.25%, while
sebanyak 2.52% berbanding dengan tahun 2019. freight vehicles increased by 4.35% and buses decreased
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Bilangan kenderaan penumpang meningkat sebanyak by 8.09% compared to the respective numbers of 2019.
2.57%, teksi menurun sebanyak 5.11% dan motosikal The number of registered in-use vehicles (active) is
meningkat sebanyak 2.25%, manakala kenderaan barang shown in Figure 5.9.
meningkat 4.35% dan bas menurun 8.09% berbanding
dengan bilangan tahun 2019. Bilangan kenderaan
berdaftar yang sedang digunakan (aktif ) adalah seperti
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 5.9.
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 157
3,000 2,867
2,500 2,434
Number of Industrial Sources 2020
Bilangan Punca Industri 2020 /
2,000
1,557
1,500 1,385
1,280
1,012
1,000 790
537 528
500 346 337
311 271
57 49 15
0
Perak
P. Pinang
Kedah
Sabah
N. Sembilan
Pahang
Sarawak
Kelantan
Terengganu
Melaka
Perlis
Labuan
Putrajaya
Selangor
Johor
K. Lumpur
Negeri / State
Rajah 5.7 : Punca Pencemaran Udara Industri mengikut Negeri Tahun 2020
Figure 5.7 : Industrial Air Pollution Sources by State in Year 2020
Bilangan Kenderaan Berdaftar / Number of Registered Vehicles
16,000,000
14,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
MOTOSIKAL / MOTOKAR / BAS / TEKSI DAN KERETA SEWA / KENDERAAN BARANG /
MOTORCYCLE MOTORCAR BUS TAXI AND RENTAL CAR GOODS VEHICLE
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
MOTOKAR / TEKSI / BAS / KENDERAAN BARANG / MOTOSIKAL /
MOTORCAR TAXI BUS GOODS VEHICLE MOTORCYCLE
Rajah 5.9 : Bilangan Kenderaan Berdaftar yang Sedang Digunakan (Aktif) pada Tahun 2019-2020
Figure 5.9 : Number of Registered In-Use Vehicles (Active) in 2019-2020
Dianggarkan pada tahun 2020, keseluruhan beban It was estimated that in 2020 the overall cumulative air
pencemaran yang terkumpul bagi pencemar karbon pollutant emission load was 2,307,440 metric tonnes
monoksida (CO) adalah 2,307,440 tan metrik, 935,747 tan metrik of carbon monoxide (CO), 935,747 metric tonnes of
bagi nitrogen dioksida (NO2), 292,651 tan metrik bagi sulfur nitrogen dioxide (NO2), 292,651 metric tonnes of sulphur
dioksida (SO2) dan 29,266 tan metrik bagi jirim zarahan dioxide (SO2) and 29,266 metric tonnes of particulate
(PM). Perbandingan keseluruhan beban pencemaran matter (PM). A comparison of the combined air pollutants
bagi tahun 2018, 2019 dan 2020 seperti ditunjukkan emission load in 2018, 2019 and 2020 is shown in
dalam Rajah 5.10. Figure 5.10.
Beban pencemaran bagi CO meningkat pada tahun 2020 Emission load for CO had increased in 2020 compared
berbanding dengan 2019. Pada tahun 2020, peningkatan to 2019. In 2020 the increment in CO emission load was
adalah sebanyak 3.2% bagi beban pencemar CO 3.2% and 1.1% for NO2. There was an increase of 8.3%
dan peningkatan 1.1% bagi beban pencemar NO2. for SO2 and for pollutant PM, the rise was 7.7% compared
Peningkatan sebanyak 8.3% bagi pencemar SO2 dan to 2019.
pencemar PM juga menunjukkan peningkatan sebanyak
7.7% berbanding dengan tahun 2019.
POLLUTION SOURCES INVENTORY CHAPTER 5 159
Kuala Lumpur
Beban Pencemaran (Tan Metrik) / Emission Loading (Metric Tonnes)
2,500,000
2,250,000
2,000,000
1,750,000
1,500,000
1,250,000
750,000
500,000
250,000
0
CO NO2 SO2 PM
2018 2,210,634 889,890 257,457 26,789
2019 2,235,241 925,370 270,270 27,178
2020 2,307,440 935,747 292,651 29,266
Pencemar / Pollutant
Rajah 5.10 : Beban Pencemaran Bahan Pencemar Udara dari Semua Punca, 2018-2020
Figure 5.10 : Air Pollutant Emission Load from All Sources, 2018-2020
160 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Loji janakuasa merupakan penyumbang utama kepada Power plants contributed the highest SO2 emission load
beban pencemar SO2 (63%), diikuti dengan lain-lain (63%), followed by other categories (26%), industries
kategori (26%), industri (6%) dan kenderaan bermotor (6%) and motor vehicles (5%) (Figure 5.11). As for PM,
(5%) (Rajah 5.11). Bagi beban pencemar PM pula, the highest contributors were power plants (39%)
penyumbang terbesar adalah daripada loji janakuasa followed by industries (29%), motor vehicles (12%) and
(39%), industri (29%), diikuti kenderaan bermotor (12%) others (20%) (Figure5.12)
dan lain-lain kategori (20%) (Rajah 5.12).
Penyumbang terbesar bagi NO2 adalah daripada loji The highest contributors of NO2 were power plants
janakuasa (62%) diikuti kenderaan bermotor (24%), (62%) followed by motor vehicles (24%), industries
industri (9%) dan lain-lain kategori (5%) (Rajah 5.13). (9%), and others (5%) (Figure 5.13). However, motor
Walau bagaimanapun, kenderaan bermotor masih vehicles remained the highest contributor of CO (95.7%)
merupakan penyumbang terbesar kepada CO (95.7%) (Figure 5.14). ‘Others’ in the figures represent air
(Rajah 5.14). Punca-punca bagi kategori ‘Lain-lain’ yang pollutant emission from residential, commercial and
dinyatakan di dalam rajah-rajah adalah merupakan non-energy use sources. The estimated annual air
pelepasan bahan pencemar udara dari kawasan pollutant emission loads of HC, CO, PM, NO2 and SO2
perumahan, komersial dan penggunaan bukan tenaga. from motor vehicles for 2019 and 2020 are shown in
Anggaran pencemaran yang dihasilkan oleh beban Figure 5.15.
pencemar udara daripada kenderaan bermotor iaitu
HC, CO, PM, NO2 dan SO2 pada tahun 2019 dan 2020
ditunjukkan dalam Rajah 5.15.
18,376
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
6%
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
14,652
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
76,673 5%
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
26%
182,950
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
63%
Kenderaan Bermotor / Motor Vehicle Loji Janakuasa / Power Station Industri / Industry Lain-lain / Others
5,764
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes) 3,645
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
20%
12%
8,441
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
29% 11,415
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
39%
Kenderaan Bermotor / Motor Vehicle Loji Janakuasa / Power Station Industri / Industry Lain-lain / Others
45,010 225,369
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes) (Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
5% 24%
584,889
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
62%
Kenderaan Bermotor / Motor Vehicle Loji Janakuasa / Power Station Industri / Industry Lain-lain / Others
76,243
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
3.30%
12,176
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
2,210,695
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes) 0.53%
95.81%
8,326
(Tan Metrik / Metric Tonnes)
0.36%
Kenderaan Bermotor / Motor Vehicle Loji Janakuasa / Power Station Industri / Industry Lain-lain / Others
2,500,000.00
Beban Pencemaran (Tan Metrik) / Emission Loading (Metric Tonnes)
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
2,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00
PM SO2 NO2 HC CO
2019 3,725.31 14,479.64 222,826.30 479,222.76 2,138,950.64
2020 3,645.48 14,652.04 225,368.86 492,169.62 2,210,694.64
Pada tahun 2020, sebanyak 7,185,227.76 tan metrik A total of 7,185,227.76 metric tonnes of scheduled waste
buangan terjadual telah dihasilkan. Ini merupakan were generated in the year 2020. This represents an overall
peningkatan sebanyak 79.04% berbanding 4,013,189.03 increase of 79.04% as compared to 4,013,189.03 metric
tan metrik yang dilaporkan pada 2019. Kategori utama tonnes reported in 2019. The main categories of
buangan yang dihasilkan adalah dros/ sanga/ klinker/ abu, scheduled waste generated were dross/ slag/ clinker/ ash,
enapcemar logam berat dan buangan gipsum (Jadual 5.1). heavy metal sludge and gypsum (Table 5.1). Selangor
Selangor menghasilkan jumlah terbesar buangan generated the largest amount of scheduled wastes
terjadual (28.51%), diikuti oleh Johor (16.83%), Negeri (28.51%), followed by Johor (16.83%), Negeri Sembilan
Sembilan (16.18%), Sarawak (6.95%), Sabah (6.45%), (16.18%), Sarawak (6.95%), Sabah (6.45%), Perak (6.11%)
Perak (6.11%) manakala sepuluh (10) negeri-negeri while the other ten (10) states generated a total of 18.97%
yang lain menghasilkan sebanyak 18.97% (Rajah 5.16). (Figure 5.16).Based on the scheduled waste generated
Berdasarkan jumlah buangan terjadual yang dihasilkan by the industries (Table 5.2), power plants generated
mengikut jenis industri (Jadual 5.2), loji janakuasa the largest quantity with a total of 2,491,477.65 metric
didapati menghasilkan kuantiti buangan terjadual yang tonnes followed by water treatment plants (1,148,834.33
tertinggi sebanyak 2,491,477.65 tan metrik diikuti loji metric tonnnes) and chemical industries (739,280.91
rawatan air (1,148,834.33 tan metrik) dan industri kimia metric tonnnes).
(739,280.91 tan metrik).
Tren pengurusan buangan terjadual dalam negara The scheduled waste management trend in the country
adalah seperti di Rajah 5.17. is as shown in Figure 5.17.
Sebanyak 714,292.11 tan metrik (9.94%) daripada jumlah A total of 714,292.11 metric tonnes (9.94%) of scheduled
buangan yang dihasilkan diperoleh kembali di dalam waste had gone through recovery process both locally
dan luar negara. Ini menunjukkan peningkatan sebanyak and abroad. This showed an increase of 38.27% as
38.27% berbanding 516,585.65 tan metrik pada tahun 2019. compared to 516,585.65 metric tonnes in 2019, where
Daripada jumlah itu, 546,290.52 tan metrik (7.60%) buangan 546,290.52 metric tonnes (7.60%) of scheduled waste
Sebanyak 214,351.09 tan metrik (2.98%) daripada jumlah A total of 214,351.09 metric tonnes (2.98%) of scheduled
buangan terjadual yang dihasilkan, dirawat dan dilupuskan wastes were treated for final disposal at Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd.
di Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd (142,479.00 tan metrik), Trienekens (142,479.00 metric tonnes), at Trienekens (Sarawak) Sdn. Bhd.
(Sarawak) Sdn. Bhd (31,988.77 tan metrik) dan 39,883.32 (31,988.77 metric tonnes) and 39,883.32 metric tonnes
tan metrik daripada buangan klinikal telah dibakar dan of clinical wastes were incinerated and disposed off at
dilupuskan di kemudahan luar tapak yang dilesenkan. licensed off-site facilities. This was an increase of 17.63%
Jumlah ini menunjukkan peningkatan sebanyak 17.63% compared to 182,220.01 metric tonnes of scheduled
berbanding 182,220.01 tan metrik buangan berjadual waste disposed in 2019. About 1,104,481.06 metric
dilupuskan pada tahun 2019. Sebanyak 1,104,481.06 tan tonnes (15.37%) of scheduled waste were treated on-site;
metrik (15.37%) daripada buangan terjadual terhasil telah while 2,983,676.57 metric tonnes (41.53%) were stored
diolah di tapak; manakala 2,983,676.57 tan metrik (41.53%) on-site at waste generators’ premises (Table 5.3).
distor di premis pengeluar buangan (Jadual 5.3).
164 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Daripada jumlah buangan terjadual yang dihasilkan pada Of the total wastes produced in 2020, 2,168,426.92
tahun 2020, 2,168,426.92 tan metrik (30.18%) telah diberi metric tonnes (40.19%) were granted conditional
kelulusan bersyarat di bawah pengurusan khas seperti approval to be managed under special management as
yang ditetapkan di bawah Peraturan 7, Peraturan-Peraturan stipulated under Regulation 7, Environmental Quality
Kualiti Alam Sekeliling (Buangan Terjadual) 2005 (Jadual 5.4). (Scheduled Wastes) Regulations 2005 (Table 5.4).
Jumlah ini merupakan peningkatan sebanyak 44.10% This amount is an increase of 44.10% as compared to
berbanding 1,504,833.23 tan metrik pada tahun 2019. 1,504,833.23 metric tonnes in 2019. These waste streams
Buangan yang terlibat adalah kebanyakannya enap are mostly sludge from drinking water treatment
cemar logam berat daripada kemudahan rawatan air facilities (49.22%), ashes from coal-fired power plant
minuman (49.22%), abu dari loji jana kuasa arang batu (41.33%) and others (9.45%).
(41.33%) dan lain-lain (9.45%) .
Jadual 5.1 : Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dihasilkan mengikut Kod Buangan Terjadual, 2020
Table 5.1 : Quantity of Scheduled Wastes Generated by Scheduled Waste Code, 2020
KUANTITI BUANGAN /
BIL / KOD BUANGAN / QUANTITY OF WASTE
NAMA BUANGAN / NAME OF WASTE
NO WASTE CODE (MT/TAHUN / PERATUSAN (%) /
MT/YEAR) PERCENTAGE (%)
1 Dros/Sanga/Klinker/Abu / Dross/Slag/Clinker/Ash SW104 3,078,454.72 42.84
2 Enap Cemar Logam Berat / Heavy Metal Sludges SW204 1,389,730.52 19.34
3 Gipsum / Gypsum SW205 528,999.01 7.36
Buangan Pelarut Organic Bukan Terhalogen /
4 SW322 310,522.69 4.32
Waste of Non-Halogenated Solvent
Campuran Buangan Terjadual dan Buangan Tidak Terjadual /
5 SW422 230,147.36 3.20
Mixture of Scheduled Waste & Non-Scheduled Waste
6 Minyak Pelincir Terpakai / Spent Lubricating Oil SW305 229,887.16 3.20
Buangan Getah atau Lateks yang Mengandungi Logam Berat /
7 SW321 200,855.67 2.80
Rubber/Latex Waste Containing Heavy Metal
8 Emulsi Minyak Mineral-Air Terpakai / Spent Mineral Oil-Water Emulsion SW307 125,285.22 1.74
9 Bekas Tercemar / Used Container SW409 116,872.80 1.63
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Jadual 5.1 : Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dihasilkan mengikut Kod Buangan Terjadual, 2020
Table 5.1 : Quantity of Scheduled Wastes Generated by Scheduled Waste Code, 2020
KUANTITI BUANGAN /
BIL / KOD BUANGAN / QUANTITY OF WASTE
NAMA BUANGAN / NAME OF WASTE
NO WASTE CODE (MT/TAHUN / PERATUSAN (%) /
MT/YEAR) PERCENTAGE (%)
Minyak/Enapcemar daripada Loji Penapisan Minyak /
28 SW314 12,146.77 0.17
Oil/Sludges from Oil Refinery
29 Alkali Terpakai / Spent Alkalis SW401 9,966.60 0.14
30 Alkali Terpakai dengan pH ≥ 11.5 / Spent Alkalis with pH > 11.5 SW402 9,355.61 0.13
Produk Dakwat, Cat, Pigmen atau Lakuer yang Tidak Mengikut Spesifikasi /
31 SW418 8,823.77 0.12
Discarded of Ink/Paint/Pigment/Lacquer Containing Organic Solvent
32 Minyak Hidraulik Terpakai / Spent Hydraulic Oil SW306 8,189.39 0.11
33 Buangan Pelarut Organik Terhalogen / Waste of Halogenated Solvents SW323 6,333.12 0.09
Klinker, Sanga dan Abu dari Penunu Buangan Terjadual /
34 SW406 6,279.55 0.09
Clinker/Slag/Ashes from Incinerator
35 Karbon Teraktif Terpakai / Contaminated Activated Carbon SW411 6,036.75 0.08
Larutan Alkali Berair Terpakai yang Mengandungi Sianida /
36 SW414 6,009.62 0.08
Spent Aqueous Alkaline Containing Cyanide
37 Buangan Cecair Terma / Waste of Thermal Fluids SW327 3,981.38 0.06
38 Buangan Bateri Asid Plumbum / Waste of Acid Lead Batteries SW102 3,558.96 0.05
39 Asid Organik Terpakai / Spent Organic Acids SW301 3,124.69 0.04
Buangan Pelekat/Glu yang Mengandungi Pelarut Organik /
40 SW303 2,985.57 0.04
Adhesive/Glue Containing Organic Solvent
41 Campuran Buangan Terjadual / Mixture of Scheduled Wastes SW421 2,934.31 0.04
42 Sisa Berminyak dari Bengkel Automotive / Oily Residue from Workshop SW312 2,841.05 0.04
43 Buangan Mengandungi Merkuri / Waste containing Mercury/Compound SW109 1,639.51 0.02
Enap Cemar dari Tangki Penyimpanan Minyak Mineral /
44 SW310 1,276.99 0.02
Sludges from Mineral Oil Storage Tank
45 Buangan Mengandungi Formaldehid / Waste Containing Formaldehyde SW320 753.48 0.01
46 Buangan Asbestos / Asbestos SW201 749.12 0.01
Tar atau Sisa Bertar dari Loji Penapisan Minyak /
47 SW315 569.30 0.01
Tar Residue from Oil Refinery/Petrochemical Plant
48 Buangan Farmaseutikal / Discarded Drug SW405 550.89 0.01
Jadual 5.1 : Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dihasilkan mengikut Kod Buangan Terjadual, 2020
Table 5.1 : Quantity of Scheduled Wastes Generated by Scheduled Waste Code, 2020
KUANTITI BUANGAN /
BIL / KOD BUANGAN / QUANTITY OF WASTE
NAMA BUANGAN / NAME OF WASTE
NO WASTE CODE (MT/TAHUN / PERATUSAN (%) /
MT/YEAR) PERCENTAGE (%)
Buangan dari Pengilangan Bahan Letupan /
65 SW431 7.32 0.00
Waste from Manufacturing/Processing or Use of Explosive
66 Buangan yang Mengandungi BFT dan TFT / Waste Containing PCB or PCT SW318 4.56 0.00
67 Enap Cemar yang Mengandungi Sianida / Sludges Containing Cyanide SW412 1.74 0.00
Buangan Sebatian Fosforus Organik /
68 SW326 1.29 0.00
Waste of Organic Phosphorus Compound
69 Sanga Kuprum / Slag Copper SW107 1.24 0.00
Garam Terpakai yang Mengandungi Sianida /
70 SW413 0.92 0.00
Spent Salt Containing Cyanide
71 Sisa dari Pemprosesan Zink / Zink Residue SW108 0.47 0.00
Minyak Pelindapan Terpakai yang Mengandungi Sianida /
72 SW415 0.19 0.00
Spent Quenching Oil Containing Cyanide
Buangan yang Mengandungii Dioksin atau Furan /
73 SW407 0.11 0.00
Waste Containing Dioxins or Furans
74 Sebatian Organologam Terpakai / Spent of Organometallic Compound SW317 0.10 0.00
Kek Tekan daripada Prapengolahan Lai Sabun Gliserol /
75 SW304 0.07 0.00
Cake from Glycerol Soap Iye
76 Enap Cemar Galvani / Galvanic Sludges SW105 - 0.00
Larutan Resap dari Tapak Pelupusan Buangan Terjadual /
77 SW420 - 0.00
Leachate from Scheduled Waste Landfill
JUMLAH / TOTAL 7,185,227.76 100.00
Perlis 4,691.77
Kelantan 12,649.58
Melaka 117,285.10
Kedah 159,938.00
Negeri / State
Pahang 251,160.99
Terengganu 264,373.72
Perak 438,910.54
Sabah 460,170.88
Sarawak 499,488.72
N.Sembilan 1,162,393.30
Johor 1,209,293.55
Selangor 2,048,558.34
Jadual 5.2 : Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dihasilkan mengikut Jenis Industri, 2020
Table 5.2 : Quantity of Scheduled Wastes Generated by Industry, 2020
JUMLAH BUANGAN / QUANTITY OF WASTE
BIL /
JENIS INDUSTRI / TYPE OF INDUSTRY (MT/TAHUN) / PERATUS (%) /
NO
(MT/YEAR) PERCENTAGE (%)
6 Premis Buangan Terjadual (PYDT) / Scheduled Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities 313,670.52 4.37
10 Penyudahan Logam dan Sadur Elektrik / Metal Finishing and Coating 144,852.87 2.02
26 Pembuatan Payung dan Lain-lain Industri Pembuatan / Others Manufacturing 3,647.09 0.05
32 Peralatan Sukan dan Permainan / Sports Equipment and Games 920.36 0.01
168 BAB 5 INVENTORI PUNCA PENCEMARAN
Jadual 5.2 : Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dihasilkan mengikut Jenis Industri, 2020
Table 5.2 : Quantity of Scheduled Wastes Generated by Industry, 2020
35 Peralatan Pejabat dan Alat Tulis / Office Supplies and Stationery 270.87 0.00
8.0
7.19
7.0
Matrik Tan X 106 / Metric Tonne X 106
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
6.5
5.0
4.00
4.0
3.26
2.85 2.97 2.92 2.77 2.74
3.0
2.35 2.36
2.02 2.08
1.92
2.0 1.46
1.37 1.36 1.33 1.38 1.16
0.91
1.0 1.08 1.12 1.36 1.10 1.08
1.04 0.79 0.82 0.84
0.63
0.06 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.18 0.04
0.0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Tahun / Year
Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Mengaplikasikan 4R / Quantity of Scheduled Waste Managed Using 4R
Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dilupuskan Menggunakan Penunu Buangan Terjadual / Quantity of Scheduled Waste Disposes by Incinerator
Jumlah Buangan Terjadual yang Dilupuskan di Tapak Pelupusan Selamat / Quantity of Scheduled Waste Disposed at Secured Landfill
Jadual 5.4 : Buangan Terjadual yang Diuruskan Di Bawah Pengurusan Khas, 2020
Table 5.4 : Scheduled Waste Managed Under Special Management, 2020
KOD METRIK PERATUS
BIL / KATEGORI BUANGAN / BUANGAN SUMBER / TAN / (%) / KAEDAH PELUPUSAN /
NO. WASTE CATEGORY / WASTE SOURCE METRIC PERCENTAGE METHOD OF DISPOSAL)
CODE TONNES (%)
Loji Rawatan
Air Minuman /
1,067,377.38 49.22
Drinking Water
Enap Cemar Logam Berat / Tapak Pelupusan Sanitari /
1. SW 204 Treatment Plant
Heavy Metal Sludge Reuse as Raw Material for Product
6,348.70 0.29
Industri / Industry
48,734.45 2.25
Coal-Fired
Kategori buangan terjadual yang dihantar ke premis The categories of scheduled wastes sent to the licensed
yang dilesenkan (Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd. dan Trienekens premises (Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd. and Trienekens (Sarawak)
(Sarawak) Sdn. Bhd.) untuk pelupusan akhir adalah seperti Sdn. Bhd.) for final disposal were sludge containing one
enapcemar yang mengandungi satu atau beberapa or several heavy metals, mixed wastes, dust/ slag/ dross
logam berat, campuran buangan terjadual, debu/ sanga/ or ash containing arsenic/ mercury and spent inorganic
dros atau abu yang mengandungi arsenik/ merkuri dan acid. Depending on their characteristics, the wastes were
asid bukan organik terpakai. Bergantung kepada ciri- either incinerated, treated physically and chemically,
ciri tertentu, buangan tersebut samada dibakar, dirawat solidified or disposed of in a secured landfill. As shown in
secara fizikal dan kimia, distabilkan atau dilupuskan Figure 5.18, most wastes sent to Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd.
di tapak pelupusan selamat. Seperti yang ditunjukkan and Trienekens Sdn. Bhd. were landfilled (61%), followed
dalam Rajah 5.18, kebanyakan sisa yang dihantar ke by incineration (32%), solidification (6%) and physical
Kualiti Alam Sdn. Bhd. dan Trienekens Sdn. Bhd. adalah ke and chemical treatment (1.0%).
tapak pelupusan (61%), diikuti dibakar (32%), solidifikasi
(6%) dan rawatan secara fizikal dan kimia (1.0%).
Solidifikasi / Solidification
6% Insinerator / Incinerator
32%
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
Rajah 5.18 : Kualiti Alam dan Trienekens : Jenis Rawatan dan Pelupusan Buangan Terjadual, 2020
Figure 5.18 : Kualiti Alam and Trienekens : Types of Scheduled Waste Treatment and Disposal, 2020
AIR QUALITY
CHAPTER 1
171
LEVEL ABOVE IV
Mn mg/l 0.1 0.1 0.2
Hg mg/l 0.001 0.004 (0.0001) 0.002
Ni mg/l 0.05 0.9* 0.2
Se mg/l 0.01 0.25 (0.04) 0.02
Ag mg/l 0.05 0.0002 -
Sn mg/l - 0.004 -
U mg/l - - -
Zn mg/l 5 0.4* 2
B mg/l 1 (3.4) 0.8
NATURAL LEVEL OR ABSENT
Cl mg/l 200 - 80
Cl 2 mg/l - (0.02) -
CN mg/l 0.02 0.06 (0.02) -
F mg/l 1.5 10 1
NO2 mg/l 0.4 0.4 (0.03) -
NO3 mg/l 7 - 5
P mg/l 0.2 0.1 -
Silica mg/l 50 - -
SO4 mg/l 250 - -
S mg/l 0.05 (0.001) -
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
CO2 mg/l - - -
Gross- α Bq/l 0.1 - -
Gross- β Bq/l 1 - -
Ra-226 Bq/l < 0.1 - -
Sr-90 Bq/l <1 - -
CCE mg/l 500 - - -
MBAS/BAS mg/l 500 5000 (200) - -
O & G (Mineral) mg/l 40; N N - -
O & G (Emulsified Edible) mg/l 7000; N N - -
PCB mg/l 0.1 6 (0.05) - -
Phenol mg/l 10 - - -
Aldrin/Dieldrin mg/l 0.02 0.2 (0.01) - -
BHC mg/l 2 9 (0.1) - -
Chlordane mg/l 0.08 2 (0.02) - -
t-DDT mg/l 0.1 (1) - -
Endosulfan mg/l 10 - - -
Heptachlor/Epoxide mg/l 0.05 0.9 (0.06) - -
Lindane mg/l 2 3 (0.4) - -
2,4-D mg/l 70 450 - -
2,4,5-T mg/l 10 160 - -
2,4,5-TP mg/l 4 850 - -
Paraquat mg/l 10 1800 - -
Notes :
* = At hardness 50 mg/l CaCO
# = Maximum (unbracketed) and 24-hour 3 average (bracketed) concentrations
N = Free from visible film sheen, discolouration and deposits
ANNEX 173
CLASS
PARAMETER UNIT
I IIA IIB III IV V
Ammoniacal Nitrogen mg/l 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.9 2.7 > 2.7
Floatables - N N N - - -
Odour - N N N - - -
Salinity % 0.5 1 - - 2 -
Taste - N N N - - -
Temperature o
C - Normal + 2 oC - Normal + 2 oC - -
Turbidity NTU 5 50 50 - - -
Total Coliform count/100 ml 100 5000 5000 50000 50000 > 50000
Notes :
N : No visible floatable materials or debris, no objectional odour or no objectional taste
CLASS USES
Conservation of natural environment.
Class I Water Supply I – Practically no treatment necessary.
Fishery I – Very sensitive aquatic species.
Class IV Irrigation
CLASS
PARAMETER UNIT
I II III IV V
Ammoniacal Nitrogen mg/l < 0.1 0.1 – 0.3 0.3 – 0.9 0.9 – 2.7 > 2.7
pH - > 7.0 6.0 – 7.0 5.0 – 6.0 < 5.0 > 5.0
Total Suspended Solid mg/l < 25 25 – 50 50 – 150 150 – 300 > 300
Water Quality Index (WQI) > 92.7 76.5 – 92.7 51.9 – 76.5 31.0 – 51.9 < 31.0
WQI = (0.22 * SIDO) + (0.19 * SIBOD) + (0.16 * SICOD) + (0.15 * SIAN) + (0.16 * SISS) + (0.12 * SIpH)
where;
Oil & Grease (mg/l) 0.01 0.14 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
In order to convert the concentration of total ammoniacal nitrogen into unionized ammonia,
calculate (a), (b), (c) and (d). Substitute the results into equation 1.
b. Calculation of PKa
2729.92
PKa = (0.0901821 + + IS(0.1552-0.000314*Temp)
Temperature in °C (Temp+273.15)
c. Calculation of working pH
pHsw = pH – (0.0007 x IS) – 0.131
ANNEX 177
Mole Fraction =
equation 1:
Ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N) x mole fraction x 17/14
Ammoniacal nitrogen should be measured in µg/l
*Aldrin/ Dieldrin, DDT, Heptachlor, Methoxychlor, Lindane, Chlordane, Endosulfan, Hexachlorobenzene, 2,4,5–T, 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, Alachlor,
Aldicarb, Carbofuran, MCPA, Permethrin
Class IIA, National Water Quality Standards
#Diambil dari
178 ANNEX
or
The sub-indices of all the parameters used for generating the GWQI are as follows
pH Sub Index
pH Si(pH)
<3.0 0
3–4 10 Acidic
4 – 5.5 30
5.5 – 9 100
9 – 10 30
10 – 11 10 Alkaline
>11.0 0
Si (Fe) = 0, if Ci exceeds 5.0 mg/L; Ci is the Si (TDS) = 0, if Ci exceeds 3000 mg/L; Ci is the
LAPORAN KUALITI ALAM SEKELILING 2020
concentration of iron determined in the groundwater concentration of total dissolved solid determined
sample. in the groundwater sample.
www.doe.gov.my