Plants Hormones, Responses and Feedback Mechanisms Week 3 Gen Bio 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

GENERAL BIOLOGY 2 ORGANISMAL BIOLOGY

PLANTS HORMONES, RESPONSES, AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS


Plants Hormones, Responses, and Feedback Mechanisms
To achieve the ideal growth, plants need
to have a constant level of essential elements. However, these nutrients are
available as irregular patchy distribution in most soils. This leads to limited
accessibility of nutrients for plants. To cope with this, plants trigger
physiological and developmental responses to acquire nutrients. These responses
alter the whole plant morphology and metabolism. Some lead to an induced
expression of chemical transporters and collection of enzymes and compounds
to remobilize the sources present. Adaptive mechanisms are also utilized by
plants to increase or decrease growth in organs that directly or indirectly
participates in nutrient acquisition (Figure 1.1). An example of this is the
proliferation of lateral roots for plants to increase nutrient uptake from nitrogen,
sulfur, or phosphorus deficient soils. Such process demands energy and organic
carbon so it can proceed to transportation and accumulation of carbohydrates in
organs used for nutrient acquisition.

In another instance, plants alter the growth patterns based on stress Figure 1.1 Comparison of a hormone
conditions such as a decline in nutrient availability. Some plants store deficient or hormone insensitive
anthocyanins to fight against photoinhibition brought about by low nitrogen dwarf mutant arabidopsis plant
or phosphorus. Plants may also opt to change their metabolic pathways like (right) with a wild- type plant of the
using other forms of glycolytic enzymes to skip nucleotide phosphate or same age (left).
phosphorus-dependent glycolytic reactions. At present, molecular components within network-mediated
nutrient signaling pathway have been identified to reflect the network and the responses they trigger. Plants
also use other means of barrier, such as physical and chemical, for protection against entrance of pathogenic
substances. As soon as a pathogen is recognized by the plant system, an inducible defense cascade occurs
which involves Oxidative burst, expression of defense related genes, formation of compounds
withantimicrobial properties, and programmed cell death. A zigzag model represents the plant immune
system in which the microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMP)by the pattern recognition of host cell
results to MAMP-triggered immunity (Rajendraand Jones, 2009). The activation of this response increases
the plant's survival against diseases. Plant hormones also play an important role in plant defense against
pathogenic microorganisms. Not only do these plant hormones perform such function, but they also regulate
the development and signal networks in plants. Some of the known phytohormones are salicylic acid (SA),
jasmonic acid JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid(ABA), auxin, gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin (CK),
brassinosteroids (BR), and peptidehormones (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 Plant Hormones and their Growth and Defense Function

PLANTS HORMONES, RESPONSES, AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS 1


GENERAL BIOLOGY 2 ORGANISMAL BIOLOGY

However, keep in mind that in natural environments, plants are bombarded with multiple biotic and abiotic
stress. Therefore, plants utilize a combination of complex regulatory mechanisms to ensure an efficient
defense response against various pathogens, pests, and other environmental stress.

Reproduction and Modern Biotechnological Application


Biotechnology has advanced significantly over the previous years that breeding crops and mass
production are now aided by plant tissue culture and molecular biology techniques. Genetic engineering n
plants were introduced in the1980s to create transgenic crops that are of high-yield and pestresistant. This
technology utilizes Agrobacterium tumefaciensto randomly introduce heterologous DNA into plants (see
Figure 1.2), thereby directly manipulating the regulatory elements or expression ofendogenous genes. This
procedure is an effective tool to increase herbicide tolerance and insect resistance but is not useful if multiple
traits are to be introduced. Thus, new genetic tools are adapted to
allow site-specific integration, multiple or multigene transfer, and
regulation of gene expression.

Here we begin with the process regulating gene expression


of through synthetic promoter and synthetic transcriptional
activators. Both are designed to fine tune gene expression. For
example, using synthetic promoters, a phytosensor may be
developed to detect pathogens. This is activated in plants by using
a functional is-regulatory element combined with signal
transduction pathways. The plant then releases a fluorescent
protein when bacterial pathogens are present in the environment as
driven by the promoters and induced by signal defense compounds
such as SA, ETand JA (Hammond-Kosack et al, 2003). In the case
of synthetic transcriptional activators and suppressors, an
engineered DNA binding domains and catalytic effector is used.
For instance, an engineered zinc-finger protein (ZFP) is used to
activate or repress genes in plants by binding to the target DNA
sequence, utilizing a different activation domain and by
establishing competing transcription factors on the same binding
site (Urnov et al., 2010).
Figure 1.2 Plant in vitro cultures with Another method to successfully perform multigene transfer
agrobacterium sp. in plants is to assemble and synthesize large DNA molecules in a
single transgene vector or transform large DNA constructs. Though
it is not possible to synthesize a whole plant genome, small artificial chromosomes may be formed to by-pass
the cloning step, which will take longer time to accomplish. Large gene construct and multigene transfer can
then be integrated to a host plant through the organelle or via nuclear transformation.

Genome editing is also a promising technology since the gene of interest may be deleted, mutated, or
integrated depending on the target trait. In transgenic tobacco plants, herbicide resistance is developed by
aiming at the acetoacetate synthase genes. In soybean genome, ZFNs are edited to incur mutation on the DCL
genes that participate in RNA silencing. This will lead to an efficient transmission of heritable targeted
mutagenesis that can be passed on to the succeeding generation.

Since the government and the public fear that transgenic traits may be uncontrollably transferred to
related plant species through simple pollen or seed transfer, transgene plants are confined to reduce or
eliminate the escape of this strain from target fields and crops. This confinement includes the induction of
male or female sterility, modification and removal of transgenic genes, introduction of genome
incompatibility, and removable of selectable marker genes. These measures are implemented since the aim of
plant biotechnology is to maintain the crop’s sustainability rather than to cause a severe crop scarcity. Thus,
extreme measures must be employed to reduce public concern on the possibility of random integration of
DNA in crops and facilitate deregulation of transgenic crops.

PLANTS HORMONES, RESPONSES, AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS 2


GENERAL BIOLOGY 2 ORGANISMAL BIOLOGY

References and Further Readings:

Bari, Rajendra, and Jonathan DG Jones. "Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses" Plant molecular
biology, vol. 69, no. 4, 2009, pp. 473-488.

Barker, Allen V, and David J. Pilbeam, eds. Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC press, 2015.

Broadley, Martin R., Philip J. White, John P. Hammond, Ivan Zelko, and Alexander Lux. "Zinc in plants."
New Phytologist vol. 173, no. 4, 2007, pp. 677--702.

Grierson, C. S., S. R. Barnes, Mark W. Chase, M. Clarke, Don Grierson, K. J. Edwards, G. J. Jellis et al.
"One hundred important questions facing plant science research. NewPhytologist vol. 192, no. 1, 2011, pp. 6-
12.

Hammond-Kosack, Kim E, and Jane E. Parker. "Deciphering plant-pathogen communication: fresh


perspectives for molecular resistance breedingCurrent Opinion in Biotechnology vol. 14, no. 2, 2003, pp.
177-193.

Mengel, Konrad, Harald Kosegarten, Ernest A. Kirkby, and Thomas Appel, eds. "Nitrogen." Principles of
Plant Nutrition, pp. 397-434. Dordrecht; Boston; London:Kluwer, 2001.

Ozturk, Munir, Serdal Sakcali, Salih Gucel, and Huseyin Tombuloglu. "Boron and plants" In Plant
Adaptation and Phytoremediation, pp. 275-311. Springer: Netherlands,2010.

Rubio, Vicente, Regla Bustos, María Luisa Irigoyen, Ximena Cardona-López, Mónica Rojas-Triana, and
Javier Paz-Ares. "Plant hormones and nutrient signaling" Plant molecular biology vol. 69, no. 4, 2009, pp.
361-373

. Seregin,I.V, and A. D. Kozhevnikova. "Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants."
Russian Journal of Plant Physiology vol. 53, no. 2, 2006, pp. 257-277.

Teale, William D., Ivan A. Paponov, and Klaus Palme."Auxin in action: signalling, transport and the control
of plant growth and development." Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology vol. 7, no. 11, 2006, 847-859.

Toenniessen, Gary H, John C. OToole, and Joseph DeVries. "Advances in plant biotechnology and its
adoption in developing countries' Current opinion in plant biology vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 191-198.

Urnov, Fyodor D., Edward J. Rebar, Michael C. Holmes, H. Steve Zhang, and Philip D. Gregory."Genome
editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases"' Nature Reviews Genetics vol. 11, no. 9, 2010, pp. 636-646.

Weiss, David, and Naomi Ori. "Mechanisms of cross talk between gibberellin and other hormones." Plant
physiology vol. 144, no. 3, 2007, 1240-1246.

PLANTS HORMONES, RESPONSES, AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS 3

You might also like