The Architecture of ArchiMate Language PDF
The Architecture of ArchiMate Language PDF
1 Introduction
In current business practice, an integrated approach to business and IT is in-
dispensable. In many enterprises, however, such an integrated view of the entire
enterprise is still far from reality. This is a major problem, since changes in an en-
terprise’s strategy and business goals have significant consequences within all do-
mains of the enterprise, including organisational structures, business processes,
software systems and technical infrastructure [1, 2]. To manage the complexity
of any large system, be it an enterprise, an information system or a software
system, an architectural approach is needed. To be able to represent the archi-
tecture of an enterprise, an architecture description language is needed allowing
for the represetation of different core aspects of an enterprise, such as business
processes, products, applications and infrastructures, as well as the coherence
between these aspects.
As discussed in [2], enterprise architecture is a steering instrument enabling
informed governance. Important applications of enterprise architecture are there-
fore the analysis of problems in the current state of an enterprise, determining
the desired future state(s), and ensuring that the development projects within
transformation programs are indeed on-track with regards to the desired fu-
ture states. This implies that in enterprise architecture models, coherence and
overview are more important than specificity and detail. This also implies the
need for more coarse grained modelling concepts than the finer grained concepts
which can typically be found in modelling languages used at the level of specific
development projects, such as e.g. UML [3] and BPMN [4]. Therefore a new
language was needed, leading to the development of the ArchiMate language [1].
The ArchiMate language was developed as part of a collaborative research
project, funded partly by the Dutch government and involving several Dutch
T. Halpin et al. (Eds.): BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009, LNBIP 29, pp. 367–380, 2009.
c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009
368 M.M. Lankhorst, H.A. Proper, and H. Jonkers