Assignment 4 Model Answer PDF
Assignment 4 Model Answer PDF
Faculty of Engineering
Civil Engineering Department
CE 3J04 – Reinforced Concrete Design
Winter 2021
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Part (a) No Axial Loads (Resolved using the general method for β and θ)
𝜆=1
[1] Calculate dv …
0.90 ∗ 550 = 495 𝑚𝑚
𝑑𝑣 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 { = 495 𝑚𝑚
0.72 ∗ 600 = 432 𝑚𝑚
[2] Location of Critical Section Relative to the Beam Edge …
𝑐
𝐶𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = + 𝑑𝑣 = 0.4/2 + 0.495 = 0.695 𝑚
2
[3] Calculate Vf …
𝑉𝑓 = 350 − (350/4.5) ∗ 0.695 = 295.4 𝑘𝑁
0.6952
𝑀𝑓 = 350 ∗ 0.695 − (350/4.5) ∗ = 224.47 𝑘𝑁. 𝑚
2
[4] Calculate Vr_max …
𝑉𝑟_𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.25 ∗ 0.65 ∗ 40 ∗ 250 ∗ 495 = 804375 𝑁 = 804.375 𝑘𝑁 > 𝑉𝑓 → (𝑜𝑘)
[5] Calculate β and θ …
𝐴𝑠 = 4 ∗ 500 = 2000 𝑚𝑚2
𝑆𝑧 = 𝑑𝑣 = 495 𝑚𝑚
35 ∗ 495
𝑆𝑧𝑒 = = 495 𝑚𝑚
15 + 20
(224.47 ∗ 106 /495) + 295.4 ∗ 103 + 0.5 ∗ 0
Ɛ𝑥 = = 9.361 ∗ 10−4
2 ∗ (2 ∗ 105 ∗ 2000)
𝜃 = 29 + 7000 ∗ 9.361 ∗ 10−4 = 35.55°
0.4 1300
β= ∗ = 0.145
1 + 1500 ∗ 9.361 ∗ 10−4 1000 + 495
[6] Calculate Vc and Vc* …
Comment
The spacing for the above cases can be summarized in the following table …
Case Spacing (mm)
No Axial Load – Simplified Method for 𝜃 and β 235
a
No Axial Load – General Method for 𝜃 and β 215
b Axial Tension 200
c Axial Compression 225
The presence of axial compression forces helps the concrete to resist the shear forces and vice versa for axial
tension forces. Therefore, one would expect that the spacing between stirrups would be the largest for the case
of axial compression force (case c) and the smallest for the case of axial tension force (case b). For the case
of no axial load, the spacing is expected to be between these two values which is true when the general method
for calculating 𝜃 and β is used. The use of the simplified method sometimes may not yield this logical
consistency.