On Reading
On Reading
On Reading
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
John T. Cull
College of the Holy Cross
A convention of fantastic literature that many critics agree on is the process by which
something supernatural irrupts in the midst of an otherwise routine and normal
environment. The intrusion of the paranormal gives rise to a tension, or vacillation, that
continues unabated until the disturbing phenomenon passes or is explained in terms of the
known physical laws of the universe. At times, as in the case of science fiction, there is no
attempt to reconcile the reader's world with that depicted in the work of fiction. However,
in order for the reader to leave the text with a sense of satisfaction and comfort, many
successful examples of fantastic literature reach or intimate some form of resolution. The
knowledge that the reader brings to the text contributes, then, to the dissipation of the
sensation of the uncanny, once in possession of the code that deciphers the mystery.1 For
* The sources for my ideas on the fantastic are, primarily, Harry Belevan, Teor?a de lo fant?stico: Apuntes para
una din?mica de la literatura de expresi?n fant?stica (Barcelona: Editoral Anagrama, 1976); Tzvetan Todorov,
The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Cornell
18
University Press, 1975); and Louis Vax, Arte y literatura fant?sticas, trans. Juan Merino (Buenos Aires:
Editorial Universitaria, 1971).
2 Jaime Alazraki notes that the presence of the uncanny in Aura is probably not intended to induce fear in the
reader (95). After summarizing Fuentes' debt to La Sorci?re, he concludes: "one must look for Aura's
originality not so much in the sources from which the bulk of its story comes, in this element or that motif,
as in the disposition of its materials" (98). "Theme and System in Carlos Fuentes' Aura" Carlos Fuentes: A
Critical View, eds. Robert Brody and Charles Rossman (Austin: Texas University Press, 1982), 95-105.
3 I assume that Felipe Montero is the narrator of Aura. In light of my interpretation of the herbs in the garden,
I cannot agree with Frank Dauster that "it is never indicated that Felipe has been altered physically" (107),
nor that Aura is "a classic case of the unreliable narrator as madman" (108). "The Wounded Vision: Aura,
Zona sagrada, and Cumplea?os" Carlos Fuentes: A Critical View, eds. Robert Brody and Charles Rossman
(Austin: Texas University Press, 1982), 106-120. Santiago Rojas, on the other hand, offers the provacative
theory that Consuelo is the narrator, and that Felipe Montero is not a real entity, but rather another
conjuration of the witch. "Modalidad narrativa en Aura: Realidad y enajenaci?n," Revista Iberoamericana 46
(1980): 487-497.
4 I do not wish to imply that Felipe is a picaro. Nevertheless, he shares traits in common with Lazarillo. They
are both relatively innocent and naive until they cross the thresholds that lead to a dark and gloomy
initiation from which neither will manage to extricate himself. The house into which Lazarillo enters is
certainly a figurative tomb: "y abri? su puerta, y entramos en casa. La cual ten?a la entrada obscura y l?brega
de tal manera, que paresce que pon?a temor a los que en ella entraban" (131). La vida de Lazarillo de Tormes y
sus fortunas y adversidades (1554), ed. Alberto Blecua (Madrid: Cl?sicos Castalia, 1972).
^ The role of Jules Michelet's La Sorci?re on Aura has been exhaustively studied by Ana Mar?a Alb?n de
Viquiera, "Estudio de las fuentes de Aura de Carlos Fuentes," Comunidad 2.8 (1967): 396?402, and Janice
Geasler Titiev, "Witchcraft in Carlos Fuentes' Aura" Revista de Estudios Hisp?nicos 15 (1981): 395^*05.
From the moment a man begins to exist in this body which is destined to die, he is
involved all the time in a process whose end is death.. .the whole of our lifetime is
nothing but a race towards death, in which no one is allowed the slightest pause or
any slackening of the pace.. .everyone is in death from the moment that he begins
his bodily existence. For what else is going on, every day, every hour, every
minute, but this process of death?... The same thing happens in the passage of
time; we try to find the present moment, but without success, because the future
changes into the past without interval. (Bk. XIII, 518-520)
7 Fuentes admits that the Circe myth influenced the genesis of Aura (537). More important is his admission
that the three intertwining narrative threads of love, death, and timelessness, have an antecedent in the
Spanish Golden Age (the time of the cr?nicas viejas studied by Felipe): "You have already noticed, of course,
that the true author of Aura...is named Francisco de Quevedo y Villegas" (531). "On Reading and Writing
Myself: How I wrote Aura" World Literature Today 57.4 (1983): 531-539. One wonders whether the
description that Ca?izares gives of her witches' art in the Coloquio de los perros contributed to the
elaboration of Aura. The line that begins the prediction of how the dogs will be transformed back into men is
suggestive in its vocabulary that coincides with a leitmotif of Aura: "Volver?n en su forma verdadera" (338).
The motif of "return" appears at crucial moments in Aura (18, 61).
WORKS CITED
Alazraki, Jaime. "Theme and System in Carlos Fuentes' Aura." Carlos Fuentes: A
Critical View. Eds. Robert Brody and Charles Rossman. Austin: Texas University
Press, 1982. 95-105.
8 Alazraki, op. cit., quotes Paz's insights on Aura from "La mascara y la transparencia": "through love Fuentes
perceives death... The eroticism is inseparable from the horror, and Fuentes outdoes even himself in the
horror, both erotic and grotesque" (95-96). Linda B. Hall finds a mythical goddess who represents this
duality of seduction and destruction: "the Aztec diety Coatlicue is at once mother earth from whom all gifts of
food grow and a devouring mother in her form as the Cipactli monster, who is at the same time both womb
and grave" (246). 'The Cipactli Monster: Woman as Destroyer in Carlos Fuentes," Southwest Review 60
(1975): 246-255.
Chasqui ? Revista de literatura latinoamericana