The document discusses the differences between shape optimization and generative design in Fusion 360. Shape optimization uses a user-defined starting shape and mesh to determine load paths and suggest material removal, while generative design removes material from low-stress areas and adds to high-stress areas to consider stress distribution without a fixed starting shape. Both tools are useful for design optimization, with shape optimization best for known external geometry and generative design for letting Fusion 360 design the shape.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views2 pages
L1-03 Shape Optimization Vs Generative Design PDF
The document discusses the differences between shape optimization and generative design in Fusion 360. Shape optimization uses a user-defined starting shape and mesh to determine load paths and suggest material removal, while generative design removes material from low-stress areas and adds to high-stress areas to consider stress distribution without a fixed starting shape. Both tools are useful for design optimization, with shape optimization best for known external geometry and generative design for letting Fusion 360 design the shape.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Lesson: Shape Optimization Vs.
Generative Design
In this lesson, you will explore the
differences between topology optimization and generative design.
Learning Objectives
• Identify a topology optimized
part. • Identify a generative designed The completed exercise part.
1. Fusion 360 has a lot to offer for optimizing your
design. Shape optimization and generative design are both built in to Fusion 360. Knowing the difference between these two tools is important. The mesh on the left was created using a shape optimization simulation study. The design on the right was created using generative design. The same criteria was used to create both; a plate was fixed to a wall and a load was applied to the four bosses. The difference in the outcome is due to the rules used to generate the bodies.
2. The shape optimization results are based on
load paths. The load was applied to the four bosses. Fusion 360 built a mesh based on how that load is transferred to the fixed plate on the wall. Shape optimization is looking to begin the simulation using a body shape that you create. It will use this shape as the bounding box for the solution. This result should be considered a reference for guiding your creation of a part for manufacture.
Lesson: Shape Optimization Vs. Generative Design Page | 1
3. The generative design result considers the stress distribution. Material is removed from low stress areas and added to high stress areas. Fusion 360’s generative design wants to know which geometry needs to be preserved and where it cannot build. The design result will be based on this input as well as the distribution of the stress throughout the body. This resulting body can be immediately used for manufacture if desired.
4. Both tools are useful for different situations.
Shape optimization is useful for situations such as when you know how the outside of a part needs to look but you need to know where you can remove unnecessary material inside the part. Generative design is useful in situations such as when you don’t know how the shape needs to look and you are willing to let Fusion 360 help. For more information on either of these techniques, be sure to check out the Autodesk resources and courses created around these technologies.
Lesson: Shape Optimization Vs. Generative Design Page | 2