Step Template Elm 490a
Step Template Elm 490a
Template
Unit Topic: The Letter “U” and high frequency words, “for, have”
Learning Goal: I want students to learn the sound of “U”, as well as to read and write it.
Students will also learn the high frequency words of the week, and practice their phonemic
awareness by segmenting and blending.
Measurable Objectives: Students will be able to identify the vowel sound “U” at the beginning
or middle (CVC) of words and the letter that represents this sound, as well as write it. Students
will be able identify, read, and correctly use the high frequency words, “for, have”. Students will
be able to identify the beginning and ending sounds in words. Students will be able to segment
and blend words.
Pre-Assessment - Copy and paste the pre-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’
knowledge of the topic prior to implementing the unit lessons. Include the scoring criteria used
to determine whether the student is Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient, Minimally
Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
I gave the class a find the U worksheet to identify their proficiency on the letter identification.
Whole group high frequency word practice, made a note of how many students where proficient
with the unit words.
Number of Students
Proficient
11
(80%-89%)
Partially Proficient
5
(70%-79%)
Minimally Proficient
4
(69% and below)
Post-Assessment – Copy and paste the post-assessment you plan to use to assess the students’ knowledge
of the topic after implementing the unit lessons. The post-assessment can be the same as the pre-
assessment, a modified version, or something comparable that measures the same concepts. Include the
scoring criteria used to determine whether students are Highly Proficient, Proficient, Partially Proficient,
Minimally Proficient when it comes to meeting the learning goal and measurable objectives.
Students complete both worksheets as a post assessment. Students scored: 23 HP, 2 P, 1 PP
Highly proficient 91-100%
Proficient 81-90%
Partially proficient 60-80%
Minimally proficient 0-59%
Percentage correct is an average taken
between both worksheets.
Summary of Unit Implementation: Day one of the unit plan implementation was a bit rocky. I struggled
with classroom management and my instruction pace was too fast. The students are already familiar with
the strategies and activity format so they did well with the reception of the information and the mastery of
objectives. Upon reflection and review with my cooperating teacher, we decided upon a few different
strategies to try on Day two of the unit plan. The implementation of day two was amazing, the classroom
management was smooth and students really enjoyed the lesson and its activities. The rest of the week
went very smooth, the students got into a routine and they were very engaged with each lesson. We
practiced the following strategies throughout the week: I do-You do-We do, pair share, partner and group
activities, and I read-We read-You read. They mastered the learning goals and objectives. As each day
went by, the students were more ready to learn and excited to show what they knew up to that point.
Summary of Student Learning: The students had prior knowledge of the unit, so the initial introduction
was not difficult. They did very well with their pre assessment. They struggled with behavior and
engagement on Day one, but that was because I did not express my expectations well and talked too fast.
The students did meet the objectives nonetheless. Students continued to identify, practice, and participate
in the /u/ focused unit plan, as well as practice and review the high frequency words for the week. They
did well with rhyming, segmenting, and blending. On day 5, the students read/repeated the decodable
reader with ease, due to the review of high frequency words and by segmenting.blending many of the
CVC words found in the decodable. Every student met the learning goals and objectives, they
successfully identified the /u/ sound and the high-frequency words, “Have, For”, practiced rhyming, and
provided /u/ CVC words.
Highly Proficient 6 23
(90%-100%)
Proficient
11 2
(80%-89%)
Partially Proficient
5 1
(70%-79%)
Minimally
Proficient 4
(69% and below)
Post-Test Analysis: Whole Class
Based on your analysis of the whole class post-test data, what is your interpretation of the students learning? Cite examples and
provide evidence of student learning that helped you come to this conclusion.
I am confident that the entire class met the learning objective. They were very excited to provide their
input more and more as each lesson progressed. By day 5 of the unit, students did not wait for me to finish
my questioning, they gave me example of the short /u/ sound and they identified the high frequency words
immediately when I displayed them. The post assessment worksheets were also completed fast and
independently when distributed. With the exception of the 3 students that were not Highly Proficient, these
students I had to vocally question their understanding and they were able to complete the worksheets after
they spoke with me/teacher.
Based on the whole class post-test data, write one paragraph analyzing the effectiveness of your instruction and
assessment and effect on student learning. Cite examples and provide evidence of student learning to support this
analysis.
Students’ learning is the most important factor when designing and delivering instruction. I believe that I
did a good job working with the strengths of my students in my instruction and assessment. The students
of my class are visual learners, they like to work together, and to respond chorally. I designed my unit to
encourage their participation and eagerness to learn. I used visuals that they could see and hold in my
activities; for example, the photo cards and videos were displayed on slides on the Smart Board and the
photo cards were also physically used by the students when I had them sort. I used a lot of repetition and
modeled activities to ensure student reception. For the students that required differentiation, I ensured that
I modeled more than once and that I translated as needed. Another reason that I believe that my instruction
was effective is because I planned group and partner work, as well as seating to better the reception of
instruction. This was especially beneficial for the students that are ELLs because they were paired with
someone that they could communicate with and close to where I could easily check for understanding.
Highly Proficient 5 9
(90%-100%)
Proficient
4 2
(80%-89%)
Partially Proficient
1
(70%-79%)
Minimally Proficient
1
(69% and below)
Post-Assessment Analysis: Subgroup
Based on your analysis of the subgroup post-test data, what is your interpretation of the student learning? Cite
examples and provide evidence of student learning that helped you come to this conclusion.
The student learning was substantial. The students that were partially and minimally proficient struggled
on the Pre-test because of their low English proficiency. By the Post-test, both students were proficient in
the objective. I paid extra attention and offered spanish support to these students to ensure that they were
understanding the material. I translated and asked if they understood the activities throughout the unit.
During the pair-share activities, I observed them making valuable contributions to the discussion. They
were able to successfully isolate and identify the /u/ in CVC words while segmenting and blending. When
completing the worksheets, I asked them at random what letter they were looking for or the initial sound
that the words made, They were successful.
Based on the subgroup class post-test data, write one paragraph analyzing the effectiveness of your instruction and assessment
and effect on student learning. If there is a student or group of students who have not mastered the objectives, discuss what you
will do in future days to aid students' understanding with respect to the unit’s objectives.
The effectiveness of my instruction and assessment with the ELL subgroup improved with each day during
the unit. I made observations and took notes of what was working with their reception of the information. I
reflected daily and spoke to my cooperating teacher about different strategies that I could try to improve
comprehension and instruction. I was very deliberate with the way that I pronounced the /u/ sound and
checked for understanding. I think that by translating for these students, I improved their understanding a
reception of the lesson activities. Improvement needs to be made with the misconception that by showing a
picture, students will automatically understand. I found myself having to explain what images meant, for
example many students did not know what an umpire does. Explaining the job of the umpire in Spanish
and English helped students COMPREHEND and make the connection between the initial sound of the
word and what it is that an umpire does.
Analyze the data of the subgroup as compared to the remainder of the class. In one paragraph,
describe the effectiveness of your instruction for this unit using the finding from your analysis.
The remainder of the class was on different levels at the time of the Pre-test. I am very proud that
compared to the remainder of the class, the subgroup scored comparable in the Post-test. All of
the students improved from the Pre-test and effectively met the learning objective. There was
only one student that measure partially proficient in the post-test. He was absent a few days
during the week and left for speech services during instruction. I do not think that I differentiated
enough to get him caught up with the rest of the class. He was able to identify the letter and letter
sound of /u/, so that was a positive outcome. I believe that my unit instruction was effective
because students had fun, were responsive, and were excited to learn and participate during
activities.
Based on your analysis of student learning, discuss the next steps for instruction, including an
objective that would build upon the content taught in this unit of instruction.
After analyzing student learning, the next steps for instruction would be to continue to review the
letter sounds and high frequency words periodically. Continued exposure and practice of the /u/
letter and sound will ensure that students build upon and improve their knowledge. This can come
in the form of identifying the sound at the end of words or at the beginning/middle of longer
words. An objective for building upon the content would be, students will be able to identify the
initial short sound /u/ at sight when reading a multiple-syllabic word in a given text.
Long-Term Goals: Teachers who are dedicated to their profession and to improving the lives of
students will continually look for ways to grow and learn. The best way to ensure that learning is
prioritized is to create a long-term goal. Create one long term goal that is specific and
measurable. Make sure to discuss the following:
Long-Term Goal: Incorporating student centered learning activities that cater to unique
learning styles, ie. writing, videos, art, listening, and reading.
Rationale: Why did you choose this goal? How I chose this goal because not all traditional forms
do you expect it to improve the outcomes of your of instruction work for every learner. Especially
future students? with diverse needs, I think that it is important to
highlight student strengths and interests to make
learning fun and engaging.
End Date: By when do you expect to accomplish I expect to accomplish this goal by the end of
this goal? the academic school-year
Action Timeline: What steps will you take to I will use trial & error, research teaching and
complete this goal, and by when will you take learning strategies that encourage student centered
them? Example: learning. Trying techniques, strategies, and
activities in the classroom. I plan to take these
1/31/18: Join AACTE
steps as soon as I enter the classroom.
Resources: What resources are available to assist Edutopia, Scholastic, Pinterest, TedTalks, and
you in accomplishing your goal? district provided (or endorsed) trainings.