Count of Observation Pay Cut?

Party 1 2 Total ResultYes(%)

Democrat 22 14 36 61%
Independent 10 9 19 53%
Republican 39 6 45 87%
Total Result 71 29 100

Thus, it can be concluded that since the percentage of Republicans that answered yes is much greater than
the percentage of Democrats or Independents that answered yes, the classifications do not appear to be
independent.

Count of Observation Lobbyists?

Party 1 2 Total ResultYes(%)
Democrat 21 15 36 58%
Independent 15 4 19 79%
Republican 34 11 45 76%
Total Result 70 30 100

Thus, it can be concluded that since the percentage of Democrats that answered yes is much less than the
percentage of Independents or Republicans that answered yes, the classifications do not appear to be
independent.

Count of Observation Term Limits?

Party 1 2 Total ResultYes(%)
Democrat 17 19 36 47%
Independent 10 9 19 53%
Republican 32 13 45 71%
Total Result 59 41 100

Thus, it can be concluded that since the percentage of Republicans that answered yes is much higher than
the percentage of Democrats or Independents that answered yes, the classifications do not appear to be
independent.
 No(%)
39%
47%
13%

es is much greater than

do not appear to be

No(%)
42%
21%
24%

s is much less than the

o not appear to be

No(%)
53%
47%
29%

es is much higher than

do not appear to be
Test Hypothesis:

Null Hypothesis:

H0 : The Response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are independent

Hα : The Response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are independent

Party Yes No Total

Democrat 22 14 36
Independent 10 9 19
Republican 39 6 45
Grand Total 71 29 100

(Row i Total)(Column j Total)

eij 
Sample Size
The expected frequesncy for each category is calculated below:

Party Yes(%) No(%)

Democrat 25.56 10.44
Independent 13.49 5.51
Republican 31.95 13.05

( f ij  eij ) 2
2   
i j eij
chi-square test statistic X2 = 10.18748

Degrees of Freedom df=(r-1)(c-1)

Degrees of Freedom df= 2

Level of Significance α = 0.05

P- value = 0.006135
TheConclusion:

Here, the p-value is less than the level of significance.

Thus, the decision is “reject the null hypothesis”

Therefore, the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the responses and party affiliation are not
independent.

Thus, there is a statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.re the p-
value is less than the level of significance, thus the descision is "reject null hypothesis"
ffiliation are not

ty affiliation.re the p-
State the test hypotheses.

Null hypothesis:
Hy : The response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are independent.
That is, there is no statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.
Alternative hypothesis:
H, : The response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are not independent.

That is, there is no statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.

Party Yes No Total

Democrat 21 15 36
Independent 15 4 19
Republican 34 11 45
Grand Total 70 30 100

(Row i Total)(Column j Total)

eij 
Sample Size
The expected frequesncy for each category is calculated below:

Party Yes(%) No(%)

Democrat 25.2 10.8
Independent 13.3 5.7
Republican 31.5 13.5

( f ij  eij ) 2
2   
i j eij
chi-square test statistic X2 = 3.71902

Degrees of Freedom df= 2

Level of Significance α = 0.05

P- value = 0.155749

Here, the p-value is greater than the level of significance.

Thus, the decision is “Do not reject the null hypothesis”

Therefore, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the responses and party affiliation
are not independent.
affiliation.

affiliation.

affiliation
State the test hypotheses.

Null hypothesis:
Hy : The response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are independent.
That is, there is no statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.
Alternative hypothesis:
H, : The response (Yes or No) and party affiliation are not independent.

That is, there is no statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.

Party Yes No Grand Total

Democrat 17 19 36
Independent 10 9 19
Republican 32 13 45
Grand Total 59 41 100

(Row i Total)(Column j Total)

eij 
Sample Size
The expected frequesncy for each category is calculated below:

Party Yes(%) No(%)

Democrat 21.24 14.76
Independent 11.21 7.79
Republican 26.55 18.45

( f ij  eij ) 2
2   
i j eij
chi-square test statistic X2 = 5.11158

Degrees of Freedom df= 2

Level of Significance α = 0.05

P- value = 0.077631

Here, the p-value is greater than the level of significance.

Thus, the decision is “Fail to reject the null hypothesis”.

Therefore, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the responses and party affiliation
are not independent.

Thus, there is no statistically significant relation between the response (Yes or No) and party affiliation.
nd party affiliation.

nd party affiliation.

nd party affiliation

d party affiliation.
The analyses performed in Parts 3 and 4 resulted in negligible p-values, indicating that there is no relationship betwee
party identification and views on the ban on lobbyists and term limits for lawmakers.

Yet, the test used in Part 2 indicates that there is a substantial correlation between a person's party affiliation and their
viewpoint on a legislative wage decrease. Republicans seem to support a legislative salary decrease for the daily state
budget far more than Democrats or Independents.

As a result, it seems that only some political lines, rather not all of them, favour change on a broad scale.
here is no relationship between

on's party affiliation and their

ry decrease for the daily state

on a broad scale.
Observation Party Pay Cut? Lobbyists? Term Limits?
1 Democrat 1 2 2
2 Democrat 1 1 2
3 Democrat 2 1 2
4 Democrat 1 2 1
5 Democrat 2 2 2
6 Democrat 2 1 1
7 Democrat 1 2 2
8 Democrat 2 1 2
9 Democrat 1 1 2
10 Democrat 1 2 1
11 Democrat 1 2 1
12 Democrat 1 2 1
13 Democrat 2 2 1
14 Democrat 1 2 1
15 Democrat 1 1 1
16 Democrat 1 2 2
17 Democrat 1 1 2
18 Democrat 1 2 1
19 Democrat 1 1 2
20 Democrat 1 1 1
21 Democrat 2 2 1
22 Democrat 1 2 2
23 Democrat 2 1 2
24 Democrat 2 1 1
25 Democrat 2 1 1
26 Democrat 1 1 1
27 Democrat 1 1 2
28 Democrat 2 1 1
29 Democrat 2 2 2
30 Democrat 1 1 2
31 Democrat 1 2 2
32 Democrat 2 1 1
33 Democrat 1 1 2
34 Democrat 2 1 1
35 Democrat 2 1 2
36 Democrat 1 1 2
37 Independent 2 2 1
38 Independent 2 2 1
39 Independent 1 1 1
40 Independent 1 1 2
41 Independent 2 1 2
42 Independent 2 2 1
43 Independent 1 1 2
44 Independent 2 1 1
45 Independent 1 1 1
46 Independent 2 1 2
47 Independent 1 1 1
48 Independent 1 1 1
49 Independent 2 1 2
50 Independent 2 2 1
51 Independent 1 1 2
52 Independent 1 1 1
53 Independent 1 1 2
54 Independent 1 1 2
55 Independent 2 1 2
56 Republican 1 1 1
57 Republican 1 2 1
58 Republican 1 1 2
59 Republican 1 1 1
60 Republican 2 1 2
61 Republican 1 1 2
62 Republican 1 1 2
63 Republican 1 1 1
64 Republican 1 1 1
65 Republican 1 1 1
66 Republican 1 1 2
67 Republican 1 1 2
68 Republican 1 2 1
69 Republican 1 2 1
70 Republican 1 1 1
71 Republican 2 2 1
72 Republican 2 1 1
73 Republican 1 1 1
74 Republican 2 2 1
75 Republican 2 1 1
76 Republican 1 2 1
77 Republican 1 2 1
78 Republican 1 1 2
79 Republican 1 1 1
80 Republican 1 1 1
81 Republican 1 2 1
 82 Republican 1 2 2
83 Republican 2 1 2
84 Republican 1 1 1
85 Republican 1 1 2
86 Republican 1 1 1
87 Republican 1 1 2
88 Republican 1 1 2
89 Republican 1 1 1
90 Republican 1 1 1
91 Republican 1 1 1
92 Republican 1 1 1
93 Republican 1 1 1
94 Republican 1 1 1
95 Republican 1 1 1
96 Republican 1 2 1
97 Republican 1 1 1
98 Republican 1 1 1
99 Republican 1 2 2
100 Republican 1 1 1