Indian Agriculture
Indian Agriculture
Indian Agriculture
15% due to the high growth rates of the industrial and services sectors, the sector’s
importance in India’s economic and social fabric goes well beyond this indicator.
First, nearly three-quarters of India’s families depend on rural incomes. Second, the
majority of India’s poor (some 770 million people or about 70 percent) are found in
rural areas. And third, India’s food security depends on producing cereal crops, as
well as increasing its production of fruits, vegetables and milk to meet the demands
of a growing population with rising incomes. To do so, a productive, competitive,
diversified and sustainable agricultural sector will need to emerge at an accelerated
pace.
Challenges
1. Raising agricultural productivity per unit of land: Raising productivity per unit of
land will need to be the main engine of agricultural growth as virtually all cultivable
land is farmed. Water resources are also limited and water for irrigation must
contend with increasing industrial and urban needs. All measures to increase
productivity will need exploiting, amongst them: increasing yields, diversification to
higher value crops, and developing value chains to reduce marketing costs.
2. Reducing rural poverty through a socially inclusive strategy that comprises both
agriculture as well as non-farm employment: Rural development must also benefit
the poor, landless, women, scheduled castes and tribes. Moreover, there are strong
regional disparities: the majority of India’s poor are in rain-fed areas or in the
Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains. Reaching such groups has not been easy. While
progress has been made - the rural population classified as poor fell from nearly
40% in the early 1990s to below 30% by the mid-2000s (about a 1% fall per year) –
there is a clear need for a faster reduction. Hence, poverty alleviation is a central
pillar of the rural development efforts of the Government and the World Bank.
3. Ensuring that agricultural growth responds to food security needs: The sharp rise
in food-grain production during India’s Green Revolution of the 1970s enabled the
country to achieve self-sufficiency in food-grains and stave off the threat of famine.
Agricultural intensification in the 1970s to 1980s saw an increased demand for rural
labor that raised rural wages and, together with declining food prices, reduced rural
poverty. However agricultural growth in the 1990s and 2000s slowed down,
averaging about 3.5% per annum, and cereal yields have increased by only 1.4% per
annum in the 2000s. The slow-down in agricultural growth has become a major
cause for concern. India’s rice yields are one-third of China’s and about half of those
in Vietnam and Indonesia. The same is true for most other agricultural
commodities.
Policy makers will thus need to initiate and/or conclude policy actions and public
programs to shift the sector away from the existing policy and institutional regime
that appears to be no longer viable and build a solid foundation for a much more
productive, internationally competitive, and diversified agricultural sector.
While agricultural growth will, in itself, provide the base for increasing incomes, for
the 170 million or so rural persons that are below the poverty line, additional
measures are required to make this growth inclusive. For instance, a rural
livelihoods program that empowers communities to become self-reliant has been
found to be particularly effective and well-suited for scaling-up. This program
promotes the formation of self-help groups, increases community savings, and
promotes local initiatives to increase incomes and employment. By federating to
become larger entities, these institutions of the poor gain the strength to negotiate
better prices and market access for their products, and also gain the political power
over local governments to provide them with better technical and social services.
These self-help groups are particularly effective at reaching women and
impoverished families.
With some $5.5 billion in net commitments from both IDA and IBRD, and 24 ongoing
projects, the World Bank’s agriculture and rural development program in India is by
far the Bank’s largest such program worldwide in absolute dollar terms. This figure
is even higher when investments in rural development such as rural roads, rural
finance and human development are included. Nonetheless, this amount is
relatively small when compared with the Government’s - both central and state -
funding of public programs in support of agriculture. Most of the Bank’s agriculture
and rural development assistance is geared towards state-level support, but some
also takes place at the national level.
The Bank’s Agricultural and Rural Development portfolio is clustered across three
broad themes with each project, generally, showing a significant integration of these
themes.
Over the past five to ten years, the Bank has been supporting:
R&D in Agricultural Technology through two national level projects with pan-India
implementation (the National Agriculture Technology Project and the National
Agriculture Innovation Project) coordinated by the Government of India’s Indian
Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR).
Dissemination of Agricultural Technology: New approaches towards the
dissemination of agricultural technology such as the Agriculture Technology
Management Agency (ATMA) model have contributed to diversification of
agricultural production in Assam and Uttar Pradesh. This extension approach is now
being scaled-up across India.
Better delivery of irrigation water: World Bank support for the better delivery of
irrigation water ranges from projects covering large irrigation infrastructure to local
tanks and ponds. Projects also support the strengthening of water institutions in
several states (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu,
Uttar Pradesh) improved groundwater management practices (for instance, in the
upcoming Rajasthan Agriculture Competitiveness Project).
Improved access to rural credit and greater gender involvement in rural economic
activities through rural livelihood initiatives undertaken by a number of states
(Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu) and soon
to be scaled up by GOI with Bank support through a National Rural Livelihood
Mission.
Agricultural insurance by advising GOI on how to improve the actuarial design and
implementation of the insurance program (e.g. rating methodology and product
design, index insurance, use of mobile and remote sensing technology to measure
yields, etc.).
The land policy agenda through analytical work as well as non-lending technical
assistance in support of GOI’s National Land Records Modernization Program.
Better rural connectivity through IDA support to the Prime Minister’s National Rural
Roads Program (PMGSY), and by connecting rural poor and smallholder farmers
through collective action to public services through Self-Help Groups (and SHG
federations), Water User Associations and Farmer Producer Organizations. Recently
the Bank’s Board of Executive Directors approved the National Rural Livelihood
Mission, which supports SHG approaches through a pan-India approach.
10. Briefly outline the main ways that agricultural land is held. What
usage rights are typically granted over agricultural land (for example,
leases)? Are there restrictions (such as a maximum length of lease
terms)? Consider any restrictions on local and foreign investors, and on
legal entities and natural persons.
Each state has its own laws relating to land usage rights and ownership of
agricultural land. Article 246 of the Constitution of India expressly states that the
state legislatures have exclusive powers to make laws in relation to any of the
matters set out in the State List (List II) of the Seventh Schedule to the
Constitution, which includes "land, rights in or over land, land tenures including
the relation of landlord and tenant, and the collection of rents and transfer and
alienation of agricultural land".
In the absence of a contract, local law or usage to the contrary, a lease of
immovable property for agricultural or manufacturing purposes is deemed to be a
lease from year to year, terminable, on the part of either the lessor or lessee, by six
months' notice expiring with the end of a year of the tenancy (section 106,
Transfer of Property Act 1882). However, section 117 of the Transfer of Property
Act states that provisions governing leases do not apply to agricultural purposes
unless the state government declares that it is applicable through notification in
the Official Gazette. In this context, several states have strictly prohibited leases of
agricultural land (for example, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra).
To liberalise the Indian agriculture market and promote agricultural efficiency and
equity, the central government enacted the Model Agriculture Land Leasing Act
2016 (Model Act) and has urged states to adopt the Model Act in the Union Budget
for 2020-21. Under the Model Act, farmers will be able to lease their agricultural
land for agricultural and related activities.
Water controls
Tax
Stamp duty
Stamp duty is charged on documents and not on transactions. Stamp duty is
governed by state law and varies from state to state. For example, in Punjab, the
transfer of agricultural land is not subject to stamp duty. However, in Maharashtra,
stamp duty at 0.5% applies to the partition of agricultural land.
A sale and transfer of immovable property for INR100 or more must be effected by
registered deed, which may trigger stamp duty liability.
Taking security
Import requirements
The domestic laws and regulations that regulate the seed industry in India are the:
Seeds Act 1966 (Seeds Act) and Seeds Rules 1968 (Seeds Rules). The
Seeds Act is the primary legislation that regulates the crop seed industry in
India. The Seed Rules were enacted to supplement the Seeds Act 1966. The
authorities set up under the Seeds Act are the:
Central Seed Committee;
Central and State Seed Laboratory; and
Seed Certification Agency.
Seeds (Control) Order 1983 (Order 1983). This provides that no person
can carry on the business of selling, exporting or importing seeds at any
place except in accordance with a licence granted under the Order.
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import Into India) Order 2003 (PQ
Order). This provides that no consignment of plants or plant products can
be imported into India without a valid permit. Under the PQ Order, plant
species mentioned in Schedule IV cannot be imported, and the plant species
and plant varieties mentioned in Schedules V, VI and VII can only be
imported with an import permit or special authorisation. All other plant
species and plant varieties, including new plant species or varieties, can only
be imported in India after a pest risk analysis (PRA) is carried out in
accordance with the guidelines issued by the Plant Protection Adviser
(PPA). All consignments must also be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the authorised officer of the country of origin. The list
of prohibited, restricted and regulated plant species under the PQ Order is
available
at: https://plantquarantineindia.nic.in/PQISPub/html/consumeProhibited.ht
m.
The PQ Order establishes the PPA, which is responsible for:
Issuing import permits.
Imposing restrictions and prohibitions on certain varieties of plants (under
Schedules IV, V, VI, and VII).
Conducting PRAs in accordance with international phytosanitary standards.
Inspections and disinfestations, as required, are carried out at certain points
of entry specified in the PQ Order.
The following rules apply to the import of seeds and plant products:
The import of seeds, tubers, bulbs, cuttings, saplings of vegetables, flowers
and fruit is allowed without a licence, but requires an import permit under
the PQ Order.
The import of seeds, planting materials and living plants by the ICAR is
allowed without a licence in accordance with conditions specified by the
Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare.
The import of seeds/tubers of potato, garlic, fennel, coriander, cumin, and so
on requires an import permit granted under the PQ Order.
The import of seeds (including seeds of rye, barley, oat, maize, millet,
jowar, bajra, ragi, other cereals, soybean, groundnut, linseed, and so on) is
allowed without a licence under the New Policy on Seed Development
1988, but requires an import permit granted under the PQ Order. A small
quantity of seeds to be imported must be given to ICAR, or farms accredited
by ICAR, for trial and evaluation for one crop season. On receipt of
applications for commercial import, the Department of Agriculture and
Cooperation will consider the trial/evaluation report on the performance of
the seed and their resistance to seed/soil-borne diseases. All importers must
make available a small specified quantity of the imported seeds to the ICAR
at cost price to the gene bank of the National Bureau of Plant Genetic
Resources. The New Policy on Seed Development 1988 was revised on 27
June 2011 to allow the import of specified quantities of seeds of wheat and
paddy initially for trial and evaluation purposes. Based on the results of
trials for one crop season, a company may be allowed to import seeds of
wheat and paddy for a period not exceeding two years subject to certain
conditions. The import of these seeds is only allowed on a case-to-case
basis, under a licence issued by the PPA on the basis of recommendations of
the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation's EXIM Committee.
International standards
India became a signatory to the Secretariat of the IPPC on 30 April 1952, and
ratified the IPPC on 9 June 1952. The IPPC office representatives were unavailable
for comment about India's adoption of the IPPC standards. However, the Indian
regulations generally comply with most IPPC standards.
The IPPC sets out some general guidelines for national plant protection and
recommends the setting up of a plant protection organisation in every state. The
responsibilities of this organisation include the:
Issuance of certificates to importing parties.
Surveillance of both cultivated and wild flora and plant products in storage
and transport.
Inspection and disinfection of plant products in international trade.
Protection of endangered species.
Conduct of pest risk analyses.
The IPPC also discusses the necessity of phytosanitary certification, to ensure that
exported plants conform with a certain standard level of quality. It also contains
provisions on imports, and states that to prevent the spread of pests, contracting
parties can choose to restrict or prohibit the entry of certain plants and materials.
17. Briefly outline any additional approvals/licences that are required
for:
Setting up R&D centres and test plots for new crops.
Crop seed production.
Commercial crop production.
Distribution of seeds or crops (wholesale, retail and e-commerce).
Farmer's privilege
Chapter VI of the PVR Act deals exclusively with farmers' rights. A farmer who
has bred or developed a new variety of seed/plant is entitled to registration and
protection under the Act and the process for registration is much simpler.
Where propagating material registered under the PVR Act has been sold to a
farmer, the breeder of the material must disclose the expected performance of the
material to the farmer. If this performance is not achieved, the farmer can claim
compensation from the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights
Authority, who will hear both parties in turn and pass an appropriate direction.
The PVR Act allows farmers to save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share or sell their
farm produce, including produce from a seed of a variety protected under the PVR
Act. However, the PVR Act prevents farmers from selling "branded seeds" of a
variety protected under the Act. "Branded seeds" is defined under the PVR Act as
seeds put in a package or any other container and labelled in a manner indicating
that the seed is of a variety protected under the Act. Therefore, farmers can use
harvested material of plant varieties owned by third parties for self-propagation,
subject to branded seeds exception.
21. Which legal actions are available to owners of PVR in the event of
PVR infringements?
An owner of PVR can bring an action for PVR infringement in a court not lower
than a district court (PVR Act). Available relief include an injunction and either
damages or an account of profits. PVR infringements can be subject to both civil
and criminal actions.
Field trials
The Guidelines for the Conduct of Confined Field Trials of Regulated Genetically
Engineered Plants in India summarises the information requirements and
procedures used by the two regulatory committees, the RCGM and the GEAC, in
the evaluation of applications. The guidelines distinguish between research
conducted under "contained conditions" and "confined field trials".
Applications for confined field trials must be made at least 60 days in advance of
the proposed trials.
Applications must be based on the forms annexed to the guidelines. Trials must be
monitored by specified authorities during planting, growing and harvesting.
Records of all trials relating to equipment, transportation, on-site monitoring and
storage must be maintained by the permitted party and available to the GEAC and
the RCGM.
Within three months of harvest, the permitted party must submit a field trial report
to the GEAC and RCGM. No harvest or by-product of a confined trial can be used
either as human food or livestock feed and must be disposed of by a method
approved by the RCGM or GEAC.
The following guidelines apply to confined field trials for all crops:
All equipment and tools used must be cleaned onsite using acceptable
methods such as hand-cleaning, compressed air, vacuuming, or high-
pressure water.
A map of the area must be appended to the record of planting, which must
be submitted to the GEAC within seven days of completion of planting.
A notice board including details of the trial must be put up by the person in
charge at the trial site.
Requirements for post-harvest management of trial sites (such as monitoring and
corrective action) have also been laid down.
Penalties
In the event of non-compliance with any of the above rules, the DLC or SBCC can
take appropriate measures at the expense of the responsible person. If an
immediate intervention is needed to prevent damage to the environment, nature or
health, the DLC or SBCC can take appropriate measures (even without notice).
Animal welfare
Liability
FSS Act
The FSS Act imposes liability on manufacturers, wholesalers, packers, distributors
and sellers, as follows:
The manufacturer or packer of a food article will be liable if the article does
not meet the requirements of the FSS Act and the associated rules and
regulations.
A wholesaler or distributor is liable for any article of food that:
is supplied after its expiry date;
is stored or supplied in violation of the safety instructions of the
manufacturer;
is unsafe or misbranded;
does not identify the manufacturer;
is stored, handled or kept in violation of the FSS Act or associated
rules and regulations; or
is received by them with knowledge of it being unsafe.
A seller is liable for any article of food that:
is sold after the its expiry date;
is handled or kept in unhygienic conditions;
is misbranded;
does not identify the manufacturer or distributors; or
is received by them with knowledge of it being unsafe.
(Section 27, FSS Act.)
The FSS Act also sets out various offences that may lead to actions against a
producer or distributor. For example, it is an offence to render a food article
injurious to health in any of the following ways:
Adding any article or substance to the food.
Using any harmful article or substance as an ingredient in the preparation of
the food.
Abstracting any constituents from the food.
Subjecting the food to any other process or treatment, with the knowledge
that it may be sold or offered for sale or distributed for human consumption.
(Section 48, FSS Act.)
FSS Act
Under the FSS Act, producers and suppliers can raise the defence that, due to
natural causes that are beyond the control of human agency, either:
The quality or purity of a primary food article fell below the specified
standard.
The constituents of a food article are not within the specified limits of
variability.
In these cases, the article will not be deemed to be unsafe, sub-standard or to
contain extraneous matter.
The following defences are also available:
Product approval was granted by the authorities.
The food article complies with food regulations and standards.
A slight deviation from the food regulations is due to the sampling or testing
procedure.
The deficiency was caused by the consumer's/buyer's negligence.
The testing in laboratories was carried out after the food expiry date.
The improvement notice was not received by the aggrieved party.
The product is not defective.
The consumer/buyer examined the product before purchasing it and
accepted it.
Contractual limitations and warranties.
CPA
The following defences may be available to a product manufacturer, product seller
or service provider under the CPA:
The buyer/user is not a consumer under the CPA.
The product is not defective as defined by the CPA.
The consumer did not suffer harm as a result of using the defective product,
as defined by the CPA.
In a product liability action against the product seller, the product has been
misused or altered at the time of harm.
The consumer, while using the product, was under the influence of alcohol
or any prescription drug that had not been prescribed by a medical
practitioner.
Specific defences provided by the CPA for failure to provide adequate
warnings or instructions.
31. Which types of damage are generally compensated by civil courts in
food safety liability cases? For instance loss of value, reparation costs,
loss of revenue, and personal injury. Are punitive damages available?
FSS Act
Details on penalties, punishment and compensation are set out in sections 49 to 67
of the FSS Act.
The FSS Act imposes penalties for:
Dealing with sub-standard food.
Manufacturing for sale, storing, selling, distributing or importing
misbranded food.
Manufacturing for sale, storing, selling, distributing or importing food
containing extraneous matter.
Manufacturing for sale, storing, selling, distributing or importing
adulterants.
Publishing misleading advertisements.
Failing to comply with the directions of the Food Safety Officer.
Manufacturing or processing food under unhygienic or unsanitary
conditions.
(Sections 50 to 58, FSS Act.)
The following offences are subject to imprisonment penalties:
Manufacturing for sale, storing, selling, distributing or importing unsafe
food.
Interfering with seized items.
Furnishing false information.
Obstructing or impersonating a Food Safety Officer.
Carrying out business without a licence.
Subsequent offences under the FSS Act.
(Sections 59 to 64, FSS Act.)
Any person who, whether by themselves or by any other person on their behalf,
manufactures for sale, stores, sells, distributes or imports any article of food for
human consumption that is unsafe and causes injury, grievous injury or death is
liable to:
Imprisonment for not less than seven years (death), six years (grievous
injury), or one year (non-grievous injury), and a monetary fine.
Pay compensation to the injured person within six months from the date of
occurrence of the incident.
(Sections 59 and 65, FSS Act.)
This may also lead to cancellation of their licence under the FSS Act.
CPA
Under the CPA, a consumer can:
Bring a claim for compensation and punitive damages before the Consumer
Court for damage caused by defective food articles.
File a criminal case for adulteration of food and drinks.
A product manufacturer/seller must compensate for any harm caused to a
consumer, including:
Damage to property, other than the product itself.
Personal injury, illness or death.
Mental or emotional distress attendant to personal injury, illness or damage
to property.
Any loss of consortium or other loss resulting from any of the above.
Contributor profile
Nusrat Hassan, Co-Managing Partner