Guidance Part 2 - Parties Teams and Processes For The Delivery Phase of Assets - Edition 6 PDF

Information management
according to BS EN ISO 19650

Guidance Part 2
Parties, teams and processes
for the delivery phase of
the assets
Edition 6
Published by
2 | Guidance Part 2 Edition 6 - February 2021
Parties, teams and processes for the delivery phase of the assets
Editions
Edition 1 July 2019 First release
Edition 2 October 2019 Update includes:
About the common data environment (CDE) ISO 19650-2 clause
5: analysis and activities (covering clauses 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.8)
Edition 3 January 2020 Update includes:
ISO 19650-2 resource map About information requirements
About the BIM execution plan
ISO 19650-2 clause 5: analysis and activities (covering clauses
5.5, 5.6, 5.7)
Edition 4 April 2020 Update includes:
About exchange information requirements
About the level of information need
About information delivery planning
About open data and buildingSMART
Edition 5 September 2020 Update includes:

Guidance renamed
Updates to the message from the UK BIM Alliance Chair plus
the Summary
Update to 1.1 to explain about parties, appointments and
procurement
General updates following industry feedback plus relocation of
the following content into separate guidance:
ISO 19650-2 resources (ISO 19650 Guidance A)
About the common data environment (ISO 19650 Guidance C)
About information requirements (ISO 19650 Guidance D)
About the level of information need (ISO 19650 Guidance D)
About the BIM execution plan (ISO 19650 Guidance E)
About information delivery planning (ISO 19650 Guidance F)
About open data and buildingSMART (ISO 19650 Guidance B)
Edition 6 February 2021 Update includes:
New section 3.0 to cover content about the
2021 National Annex
Nothing in this guidance constitutes legal advice or gives rise to a solicitor/client relationship. Specialist legal advice should be taken in
relation to specific circumstances.
The contents of this guidance are for general information purposes only.
Permission to reproduce extracts from the ISO 19650 series is granted by BSI Standards Limited (BSI) and the copyright in Figure 2 used
in this report belongs to BSI. No other use of this material is permitted.
British Standards can be obtained in PDF or hard copy formats from the BSI online shop: http://www.bsigroup.com/Shop or by contacting
BSI Customer Services for hard copies only: Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 9001, Email: [email protected]
Any data or analysis from this guidance must be reported accurately and not used in a misleading context.
If using any information from this report, then its source and date of publication must be acknowledged.
© COPYRIGHT 2021 the Editors, Authors and Contributors named herein

Table of contents
Message from the UK BIM Alliance Chair 3
Acknowledgments4
About BS EN ISO 19650 and building information modelling (BIM) 5
Abbreviations and acronyms 6
About this guidance document 7
1.0 About ISO 19650 parties and teams 8
1.1 U
nderstanding your role and the team context 8
1.2 Understanding activities and stages 13
1.3 Appointing party 14
1.4 Lead appointed party 18
1.5 Appointed party/task team 24
2.0 ISO 19650-2 clause 5: analysis and activities 28
3.0 About the 2021 National Annex 72
3.1 Changes in the 2021 National Annex 73
3.1.1 Information Container ID Applicability 73
3.1.2 Field/String Length 74
3.1.3 Project Identifier 75
3.1.4 Originator Identifier 76
3.1.5 Functional Breakdown Identifier 77
3.1.6 Spatial Breakdown Identifier 78
3.1.7 Form Identifier 79
3.1.8 Discipline Identifier 81
3.1.9 Unique Number Identifier 83
3.1.10 Status 84
3.1.11 Classification 87
3.2 A pplying the 2021 National Annex 88
3.2.1 A pplication guidance for assessment and need 88
3.2.2 Application guidance for the remainder of the delivery phase 89
4.0 Information management process summary 90
5.0 Summary 102
List of figures
Figure 1: ISO 19650 guidance framework 7
Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams 8
Figure 3: Simple party/appointment relationship 9
Figure 4: The scenario where there are multiple lead appointed parties and appointed parties (note
the parties identified are for illustration only). 10
Figure 5: Example appointing party and lead appointed party relationships, early design stage (note
the parties identified are for illustration only) 11
Figure 6: The change in the architect’s appointment from a pre to post novation scenario (note the
parties identified are for illustration only) 12
Figure 7: Make-up of the delivery team (note the parties identified are for illustration only) 12
List of tables
Table 1: Abbreviations and acronyms 6
Table 2: Activities and stages 13
Table 3: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment 15
Table 4: A ppointing party activity focus 16
Table 5: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment 19
Table 6: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment 20
Table 7: Lead appointed party activity focus 22
Table 8: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment 25
Table 9: Appointed party/task team activity focus 27
Message from the

UK BIM Alliance Chair
Author: D
r Anne Kemp OBE
Chair - UK BIM Alliance
The UK BIM Framework provides the the “end in mind” and consideration from an
fundamental step towards digital organizational, whole life perspective. This
transformation of the UK’s built environment then informs the detailed requirements right
industry. The Framework is based on the ISO down to appointment level.
19650 series, which first developed out of the
UK’s former BIM Level 2, but incorporates The work behind developing this Guidance
and anticipates global and future digital has been considerable. I would like to thank
perspectives. Sarah Davidson and David Churcher for their
tireless commitment in continuing to bring this
The UK BIM Framework embraces and assists work together – I so enjoy working with you
in the implementation of the standards both. Secondly, I would like to thank the many
for managing information for the whole authors who have contributed so generously
life of assets of the built environment. The to the writing of the Guidance – and been so
Framework anticipates the potential for patient in the criticisms and changes that have
integration across portfolios. The Framework been required of them. Finally, I would like to
provides extensive Guidance which continues thank the many people who have spared time
to be developed, including the addition of to review and feedback on the Guidance – the
supplementary tools and materials to enable Focus Groups in particular, but also those who
a firm basis for the evolving National Digital have contacted us separately. Without this
Twin Programme. feedback we would not be able to incorporate
the wide-ranging experience and testing which
This Guidance has been developed to help is occurring around the industry.
industry to implement the concepts and
principles of the ISO 19650 series upon which We welcome your continued feedback and
the UK BIM Framework is based. It has shared experiences. You can provide this via
been continually updated to keep track of [email protected].
the publication of the different parts of ISO
19650, and to reflect lessons learnt as further
experience is gained in its implementation.
The key parts of ISO 19650 are now all in

place, allowing us to realize information
management throughout the whole life of
built environment assets. It provides for
traditional ways of working entailing exchange
of information via files, but also caters for
shifts towards data exchange. The key is
being specific about what information is
required and how it is to be delivered. This
needs forethought around what should be
Acknowledgments
This guidance represents the collaborative efforts of
the following people and organizations
Editors
David Churcher Hitherwood Consulting Ltd Author: Sections 1 and 2
Sarah Davidson University of Nottingham Author: Sections 1 and 2
Anne Kemp Atkins
Authors
Andy Boutle Kier Author: Section 2
Paul Dodd Scottish Futures Trust Author: Section 2
Jack Dearlove ISG Author: Section 2
Emma Hooper Bond Bryan Author: Section 2
John Ford Galliford Try Author: Section 2 and 3
Dan Rossiter British Standards Institution Author: Section 2
Ryan Tennyson Scottish Futures Trust Author: Section 2
Neil Thompson Atkins Author: Section 2
May Winfield Buro Happold Author: Section 2
Sonia Zahiroddiny
HS2 Author: Section 2
Contributors
Nigel Davies Evolve Consultancy
Stephen Holmes Cadventure Ltd
Michael Hudson Flanagan Lawrence
Simon Lewis Womble Bond Dickinson
David Philp Centre for Digital Built Britain
Casey Rutland Royal Haskoning DHV
Production
Centre for Digital Built Britain
About BS EN ISO 19650 and building

information modelling (BIM)
The BS EN ISO 19650 series of standards Standards within the ISO 19650 series are
(herein after referred to as the ISO 19650 available at www.bsigroup.com. Visit
series) is an international standard of good www.ukbimframework.org to see how the ISO
practice. It defines information management 19650 standards plus other standards within
principles and requirements within a the UK BIM Framework map to the design,
broader context of digital transformation build, operate and integrate process.
in the disciplines and sectors of the built
environment (including construction and asset
management industries). Its implementation
in the UK is supported by UK National
Forewords in ISO 19650 Parts 1 and 2, and a
UK National Annex in ISO 19650 Part 2.
The ISO 19650 series replaces some of

the existing British Standards and Publicly
Available Specifications relating to
information management using building
information modelling (BIM). It is part
of a landscape, or ecosystem, of national
and international standards supporting
information management processes and
technical solutions. It considers all information
whether it is a construction programme, a
record of a meeting, a geometrical model or a
contract administration certificate.
Building information modelling (BIM) plays a

key part in the management of information
because it provides a methodology that helps
us to structure information so that technology
can process it.
Structuring information using industry

standards helps to improve interoperability.
This means that information can be joined-
up by both people and technology, which
then enables us to extract more valuable
knowledge from it. Using the same
information structures throughout industry
generates consistency, repetition and
predictability. This brings real efficiency
gains for businesses and provides the data
architecture for the connected future.
Abbreviations and acronyms
This guidance includes a number of abbreviations and acronyms as set out in Table 1.
Table 1: Abbreviations and acronyms
Abbreviation or acronym Term
AIR Asset information requirements
BEP BIM execution plan
BIM Building information modelling
CDE Common data environment
EIR Exchange information requirements
MIDP Master information delivery plan
TIDP Task information delivery plan

About this guidance document
The guidance framework supports the UK

implementation of the ISO 19650 series.
This guidance document (guidance part 2)
sits within an overall guidance framework as
shown in Figure 1.
ISO 19650
Guidance Part 1
Concepts
ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650

Guidance Part 2 Guidance Part 3 Guidance Part 4 Guidance Part 5
Delivery phase Operational phase (To be confirmed) (To be confirmed)
ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650
Guidance A Guidance B Guidance C Guidance D Guidance E Guidance F
The Open data, Facilitating the Developing Tendering and Information
information buildingSMART CDE (workflow information appointments delivery
management and COBie and technical requirements planning
function & solutions)
resources
Figure 1: ISO 19650 guidance framework
Guidance part 2 is written to support the As with all guidance supporting the UK
implementation of ISO 19650-2 and is BIM Framework, we invite comment and
relevant to any organization involved in the feedback on this guidance part 2 at
delivery phase of an asset. It considers the [email protected].
arrangement of parties and teams according
to ISO 19650-2 and the activities associated
with each sub-clause within ISO 19650-2
clause 5.
It is important that guidance part 2 is read

in conjunction with guidance parts A-F
where more detail about particular activities
and processes is needed. These associated
guidance documents are sign-posted
throughout this guidance.
1.0 About ISO 19650 parties and teams
1.1 Understanding your role and the team context

This guidance is written so that you can read
it from start to finish or you can navigate
through it to understand the activities that
are particularly relevant to your role within a
project team.
The ISO 19650 series refers to the appointing

party, lead appointed party and appointed
party and the project team, delivery team and
task team.
ISO 19650-2 Figure 2 shows the interface

between these parties and teams in terms of
information management. A colour coded,
simplified version of this image, reproduced
with permission from BSI, features in this
guidance to provide context to the parties,
teams and activities.
Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams
Key:
Appointing
A Party
1
3 2
Lead
B Appointed Party C
C
Appointed Party C
1 C
Project Team
2 B ...
2
Delivery Team
3
Task Team(s)
... B
3
A
Information requirements
and information exchange
within a delivery team and
with the appointing party
B 2
Information co-ordination
between delivery teams
3
C
Simplified version of ISO 19650-2 Figure 2

Image reproduced with permission from BSI
Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams

Sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 of this guidance

explain the activities and outputs of the
appointing party, a lead appointed party
and an appointed party. Section 4 of this
guidance shows the flow of activities according
to ISO 19650-2 clause 5 and the party/parties
engaged in each activity.
It is therefore essential that you understand

the ISO 19650-2 role that you are fulfilling
so you are clear about your primary and
contributing activities and outputs as well as
the information management elements of the
appointment(s) that you are a party to.
The parties and relationships are as follows

(in simple terms):
The appointing party is the client or the party

managing information on behalf of the client.
A lead appointed party is a party appointed

by the client.
An appointed party is a party appointed by

the lead appointed party. The appointed
party is the party that provides the
information. See Figure 3 and the more
detailed descriptions of these parties provided
in guidance sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4.
Appointing party
(the client)
Appointment
Lead appointed
party
(for example for
construction)
Appointment
Appointed party
(for example the
steelwork
sub-contractor)
Figure 3: Simple party/appointment relationship
It is important to note that appointments for

non-design and design related activities are
subject to the same ISO 19650-2 processes.
The appointing party (the client) is likely

to have several appointments with lead
appointed parties (for example, for
architecture, engineering, project management
and construction), and a lead appointed
party is likely to have several appointments
with appointed parties (especially where they
are a main contractor) – remember that an
appointed party is the party that provides
the information. See Figure 4.
Appointed party
(the structural engineer)
Lead appointed party

(for engineering)
Appointed
party
(the architect)
Appointed party Lead Lead appointed

(the project appointed party
manager) party (for
(for project architecture) Appointed
management) party
(the interior
designer)
Lead appointed
party
(for construction)
Appointed Appointed Appointed Appointed

party party party party
(the main (the steelwork (the curtain (the building
contractor) sub-contractor) walling sub- services sub-
contractor) contractor)
Key:
Appointing Party
Appointment
Figure 4: The scenario where there are multiple lead appointed parties and appointed parties (note the parties identified
are for illustration only).
A project delivered according to a “traditional”

structure will have many lead appointed
parties, reflecting the direct relationships
that are necessary between the client, its
consultants, contractor(s) and any specialists.
A project delivered according to a “design

and build’ structure could have just one lead
appointed party (for design and construction).
The more common scenario, where there is
an element of design carried out prior to
the appointment of the design and build
contractor will mean that there are multiple
lead appointed parties. In this scenario, a
lead appointed party may be appointed for
architecture for the first part of the project–
see Figure 5. However, when the architecture
element of the project is novated to the
design and build contractor, the architect will
become an appointed party to the contractor
and the function of the lead appointed party
for architecture will cease - see Figure 6.
Appointed party

(for engineering)
Appointed party Lead Lead appointed Appointed

(the project appointed party party
manager) party (for (the architect)
(for project architecture)
management)
Key:
Appointing Party
Appointment
Figure 5: Example appointing party and lead appointed party relationships, early design stage (note the parties
identified are for illustration only)
Appointed party

(for engineering)
Appointed party Lead Lead appointed Appointed

(the project appointed party party
manager) party (for (the architect)
(for project architecture)
management)
Lead appointed
Key: party
Appointing Party (for construction)
Appointment

Appointment pre-novation
Indicates the change in

Appointed party
appointment from pre to post (the architect post
novation novation)
Figure 6: The change in the architect’s appointment from a pre to post novation scenario (note the parties identified are
for illustration only)
A lead appointed party and their appointed Where there is a lead appointed party
party/parties make up a delivery team as there will be a delivery team (even if the
shown in Figure 7. delivery team only consists of one lead
appointed party organization). Most projects
will therefore comprise multiple delivery
teams, regardless of the structure of the
overall project (traditional, design and build,
management and so on).
Appointed
Delivery party
(the architect) The project team comprises the appointing
team
party (the client) plus all delivery teams as
Lead appointed show in this guidance and ISO 19650-2 Figure
party 2. It is therefore essential that information
(for
architecture) Appointed is coordinated across delivery teams as well
party as within delivery teams. This requirement is
(the interior
designer) explored further in ISO 19650 guidance A.
Key:
Appointment
Figure 7: Make-up of the delivery team (note the parties identified are for illustration only)
1.2 Understanding activities and stages

The activities that the parties carry out are set
out in ISO 19650-2 clause 5 and cover eight
stages as follows:
Table 2: Activities and stages
Per Project
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7

Assessment Invitation to Tender Appointment Mobilization Collaborative Information
5.8
and need tender response production of model
Project
information delivery
close-out
Procurement Planning Production
Per lead appointed party appointment
Activities can be categorized as: If you want to go directly to the activities

relevant to you then:
• P roject level (per project). This means the
activity relates to the project as a whole Go to page 14 for the “Appointing
• Appointment level (per appointment). This Party” section if you are a client or you
means the activity relates to the lead are managing information on behalf of a
appointed party appointment. client.
Activities set out in ISO 19650-2 clauses
Go to page 18 for the “Lead
5.1 and 5.8 relate to a project as a whole.
Appointed Party” section if you are
Activities set out in clauses 5.2 to 5.7
you tendering to be/are responsible for
are repeated for each piece of work the
coordinating information between the
appointing party (client) tenders (be it for
delivery team and the appointing party
consultants, contractors and/or specialists).
(client).
The colours represent parties that are active
within each stage. Go to page 24 for the “Appointed
Party/Task Team” section if you are
tendering for/appointed to a project
generally.
If you want to see the flow of activities

between all the parties then go to page
90 for the ‘Process Summary’.
1.3 Appointing party
1
3 2
C
C If you are a client or are managing information on behalf
C
2 B ... of a client this means that you are fulfilling the role of the
... B “appointing party” – you are effectively the party “owning” the
A
3
appointment/project in the context of the ISO 19650 series.
B 2 As appointing party you are a member of the Project Team.
3
C
Your activities and outputs can be Then for each separate piece of work you are
summarized as: sending out to tender, you need to establish
your information requirements. Your outputs
Firstly – to make sure that your information
in compiling each tender package should
management function is fulfilled by people
consider, and where appropriate include:
within your organization or people acting on
your behalf or a combination of both. • E xchange information requirements (EIR)
Then wherever the ISO 19650 series refers • Existing information and resources that are
to the “appointing party” this means relevant to the tendering opportunity
the organization(s) fulfilling the client’s • Details of how the tender will be evaluated
information management function. • Overall project requirements for
information delivery, standards and
Going forward then, in respect of the whole processes
project and before any invitations to tender
• The project’s information protocol.
are issued, your activities as appointing party
are to: It is up to you to determine how these project
level and appointment specific resources are
• E stablish the project’s information
assembled into the tender and appointment
requirements, information delivery
package for a lead appointed party
milestones and information standards
• Identify specific procedures for the In the process of confirming an appointment
production of information including (of the lead appointed party for example the
its generation, delivery and secure main contractor) you will both need to agree
management any changes to the information standards
• Identify existing information and/or and they should inform you of any risks/
resources that are relevant to the delivery issues which could impact project information
teams you will be appointing to this project delivery milestones. The appointment
• Establish the project’s information documents should then include information
protocol for incorporation into all project and information requirements relevant to the
appointments. appointment.
You will also need to establish a common data This is a process/activity that is repeated for
environment (CDE) to support the project and each confirmed appointment.
the collaborative production of information.
You may wish to appoint a third party to host,
manage or support the CDE.
See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand the

CDE in detail.
Table 3: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment

Lead appointed party’s appointment will document the: Prepared by: Prepared by:
Appointing Lead appointed
party party
Project level Information standard ✓
Information production methods and procedures ✓
Information protocol ✓
Appointment Exchange information requirements ✓

level
BIM execution plan ✓
Master information delivery plan ✓
Note: preparation of a resource also includes delegation for its preparation.
As appointing party and throughout the

project you will review each delivery team’s
information model against your information
requirements and accept or reject as
appropriate.
As the project nears close out and the project

information model is completed, you will
archive the information containers. You will
also capture lessons learned with each lead
appointed party.
See ISO 19650 guidance A to understand the

information management function in detail
and the relationship between appointment
resources.
See ISO 19650 guidance E to understand

information requirements in detail.
Activity focus: Relevant clauses to be aware of

Your level of involvement across ISO 19650-2 For your actions as the appointing party refer
clause 5, as an appointing party is as follows: to clauses:
Table 4: Appointing party activity focus 5.1.1 Appoint individuals to undertake the
information management function
5.1 A
ssessment and need (project) High
5.1.2 Establish the project’s information
5.2 Invitation to tender requirements
High
(appointment) 5.1.3 Establish the project’s information
5.3 T
ender response delivery milestone
Low
(appointment) 5.1.4 Establish the project’s information
delivery standard
5.4 Appointment Medium
5.5 Mobilization Low production methods and procedures
5.6 Collaborative production of 5.1.6 Establish the project’s reference
Low information and shared resources
information
5.7 Information model delivery Medium 5.1.7 Establish the project’s common data
environment
5.8 P
roject close-out High
protocol
5.2.1 Establish the appointing party’s
exchange information requirements
5.2.2 Assemble reference information and
shared resources
5.2.3 Establish tender response requirements
and evaluation criteria
5.2.4 Compile invitation to tender
information
5.4.6 Complete lead appointed party’s
appointment documents
5.7.4 Review and accept the information
model
5.8.1 Archive the project information model
5.8.2 Compile lessons learnt for future
projects
You should also be aware of the following

clauses which are relevant because they
require you to be informed or to contribute to
a process:
5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM

execution plan
5.4.5 Establish the master information
delivery plan
5.5.2 Mobilize information technology
1.4 Lead appointed party
1
3 2
C
C
C If you are responsible for coordinating information between the
2 B ...
...
delivery team that you are part of and the appointing party
B
3 A (client) this means that you are fulfilling the role of the “lead
appointed party” in the context of the ISO 19650 series.
B 2 You are a member of both the Project Team and a Delivery
3 Team.
C
Reference to the lead appointed party

The ISO 19650 series refers to the lead Going forward then, in response to the
appointed party in two ways: invitation to tender, and in collaboration with
the prospective members of your delivery
1. T
he prospective lead appointed party team you:
i.e. a party tendering for the role of lead
appointed party • E stablish the BIM execution plan (BEP)
2. L
ead appointed party i.e. a party who is • Summarize the delivery team’s capability
confirmed in that role. and capacity to manage and produce
information
Your key activities and outputs as a • Establish the delivery team’s mobilization
prospective lead appointed party are: plan, thinking about team-wide approach,
responsibilities and required timescales
Firstly - to make sure that your information
management function is fulfilled by people • Create a risk register to deal with
within your organization or people acting on risks associated with timely delivery of
your behalf or a combination of both. information.
Then wherever the ISO 19650 series refers The outputs from these activities should form
to the “prospective lead appointed party” part of your overall tender response.
or “lead appointed party” this means the
organization(s) fulfilling your information
management function.
See ISO 19650 guidance A to understand the

information management function in detail.
In order to finalize your appointment as a lead appointed party:

Your completed appointment documents will
comprise:
Table 5: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment

Lead appointed party’s appointment will document the: Prepared by: Prepared by:
Appointing Lead appointed
party party
Project level Information standard ✓
Information production methods and procedures ✓
Information protocol ✓
Appointment Exchange information requirements ✓

level
BIM execution plan ✓
Master information delivery plan ✓
Your first activity at this point is to update You are also responsible for compiling the
and confirm the BEP in collaboration with master information delivery plan (MIDP)
each (to be) appointed party. Any required through the collation of the task information
additions or amendments to the project’s delivery plans (TIDPs) generated by each task
information standard, its production methods team (as a lead appointed party you may
and procedures, and its information protocol also have to undertake task team activities so
will need to be agreed with the appointing you may have your own TIDP).
party. The BEP will have contained a high
level responsibility matrix and this now See ISO 19650 guidance A to see the
needs to be separately refined, developed relationships between the appointment
and sufficiently detailed to identify what resources and ISO 19650 guidance E to see
information is to be produced, when and by more detail about the BEP.
whom (i.e. which task team).
See ISO 19650 guidance D to see more detail
As lead appointed party, you may have your
about information requirements
own information requirements in addition
to those provided to you by the appointing
party. A key activity at this stage is therefore
articulating these combined EIR relevant to
each prospective appointed party within your
delivery team so that each has clear direction
about what is required of them.
Once you are appointed as lead

appointed party
You will need to compile appointment

documents for each (to be) appointed party.
These should be tailored so that you include
the task team EIR and TIDPs that are
relevant to the appointment alongside the
delivery team’s BEP and the agreed project
level documents as presented below:
Table 6: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment

Appointed party’s appointment will document the: Prepared by: Prepared by: Prepared by:
Appointing Lead Appointed
party appointed party/task
party team
Project level Information standard
Information production methods and
procedures
Information protocol
Delivery team BIM execution plan
level
Appointment Exchange information requirements
level
Task information delivery plan

You then need to mobilize resources. This This process should repeat and continue
means getting people within the delivery team throughout your appointment.
suitably trained with technology and processes
in place, tested and up and running. The Another activity of the lead appointed party
project’s common data environment (CDE) is is to capture lessons learned, in collaboration
fundamental to successful information based with the appointing party - ideally throughout
activities and as lead appointed party you your appointment, as opposed to just at the
should be made aware of any issues task end of it.
teams experience with its operation, or with
the information/resources accessed through
it. Only then is the delivery team in a position
to generate, assure, review and authorize
information for sharing.
See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand

more about the CDE
As lead appointed party, you have the pro-

active role of managing the progression of the
delivery team’s information model.
A key activity at the end of each milestone

is authorizing each task team’s information
model to ensure that it meets the project’s
information standard, the BEP and the EIR
assigned to the task team. An information
model which is found to be non- compliant
(in any aspect) should be rejected with the
associated task team(s) being advised to
amend their information accordingly.
The delivery team’s information model

authorized by you is then reviewed by the
appointing party. Rejection of an information
model will be communicated by the
appointing party to you,which you will then
need to resolve with the relevant task team.
Acceptance of an information model triggers
your ability to co-ordinate the information
model with other delivery teams’ information
models.
Activity focus: For your primary actions as the lead

Your level of involvement across ISO 19650-2 appointed party refer to clauses:
clause 5, as lead appointed party is as follows: 5.3.1 Nominate individuals to undertake the
information management function
Table 7: Lead appointed party activity focus
5.3.2 Establish the delivery team’s (pre-
5.1 A
ssessment and need appointment) BIM execution plan
Nil
(project) 5.3.4 Establish the delivery team’s capability
5.2 Invitation to tender and capacity
Nil
(appointment) 5.3.5 Establish the proposed delivery team’s
5.3 T
ender response mobilization plan
High
(appointment) 5.3.6 Establish the delivery team’s risk
register
5.4 Appointment High
5.3.7 Compile the delivery team’s tender
5.5 Mobilization High response
5.6 Collaborative production of 5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM
High execution plan
information
5.7 Information model delivery High 5.4.2 Establish the delivery team’s BIM
execution plan
5.8 Project close-out Medium
5.4.3 Establish the lead appointed party’s
exchange information requirements
delivery plan
5.4.7 Complete appointed party’s
appointment documents
5.5.1 Mobilize resources
5.5.3 Test the project’s information
production methods and procedures
5.6.5 Information model review
5.7.2 Review and authorize the information
model
5.8.2 Compile lessons learnt for future
projects

clauses which are relevant because they
require you to be informed or to contribute
to a process:
5.3.3 Assess task team capability and
capacity
5.6.1 Check the availability of reference
information and shared resources
5.6.2 Generate information
5.7.1 Submit information model for lead
appointed party acceptance
5.7.3 Submit information model for
appointing party acceptance
5.7.4 Review and accept information model
1.5 Appointed party/task team
1
3 2
C
C
C If you are tendering for or appointed to a project
2 B ...
...
generally, this means that you are fulfilling the role of
B
3 A an “appointed party” in the context of the ISO 19650
series. You are a member of both the Project Team and
B 2 a Delivery Team.
3 Your organization may include a number of task teams
C
within it.
Reference to appointed party and task Your key activity as a prospective

team appointed party/task team is to:
In ISO 19650-2, most of the requirements Assess your capability and capacity. There are
below the level of lead appointed party are three aspects of capability and capacity to be
directed at a task team. There is a lot of considered.
flexibility within ISO 19650 regarding the
relationship between appointed parties and 1. C
apability and capacity to manage
task teams – in some cases each task team information – do you have experience of
might be a separate appointed party, in the standards and do you have enough
other cases an appointed party might include human resource to do this on this project
a number of task teams, and in yet more 2. C
apability and capacity to produce
cases a task team might include a number of information – do you have experience of
appointed parties. the methods and procedures and do you
have enough human resource to do this
To keep things simple in this guidance we are
on this project
considering the standard to have the same
impact on an appointed party and a task 3. A
vailability of IT – do you have the
team. appropriate hardware, software and
support, in sufficient quantities for the
Although some ISO 19650 requirements arise project.
before the appointed party/task team is
appointed, the standard does not use the term
“prospective appointed party”, but we do use
this term in the guidance.
In order to finalize your appointment as The information requirements included in

an appointed party/task team: your appointment might be a combination of:
those issued to or originating from the lead
You help the lead appointed party to
appointed party.
confirm the delivery team’s BEP. Any required
additions or amendments to the project’s From your perspective it does not matter
information standard, production methods which requirements originate with whom, as
and procedures, and information protocol will they all need to be addressed in the TIDP(s)
need to be agreed with the appointing party. that you establish in collaboration with the
The BEP will have contained a high level appointed parties across the task team(s).
responsibility matrix and this now needs to be These plans are then made available to the
separately refined, developed and sufficiently lead appointed party for them to compile the
detailed to identify what information is to be MIDP.
produced, when and by whom (i.e. which task
team).
ISO 19650 guidance F provides more
detail about information delivery planning
See ISO 19650 guidance E to understand (responsibility matrices and information
more about the BEP and ISO 19650 guidance delivery plans)
A to see the relationships between the various
resources (such as the project’s information
standard).
Your completed appointment documents will comprise:
Table 8: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment

Appointed party’s appointment will document the: Prepared by: Prepared by: Prepared by:
Appointing Lead Appointed
party appointed party/task
party team
Project level Information standard
Information production methods and
procedures
Information protocol
Delivery team BIM execution plan
level
Appointment Exchange information requirements
level
Task information delivery plan
Once you are appointed as an When your information model is ready to be

appointed party/task team delivered, you submit it to the lead appointed
party for their review and authorization. If
You work closely with the lead appointed
your information is rejected then you make
party to mobilize the team resources
the agreed changes and resubmit.
(personnel and IT) and to participate in
training and education where this is necessary Once your information has been authorized
to fill knowledge and skills gaps. by the lead appointed party, you submit your
information for appointing party review and
You collaboratively generate your information
acceptance. If your information is rejected
in compliance with the information standard,
then this will come back to you via the
information production methods and
lead appointed party to be amended and
procedures, using the appointing party’s
resubmitted.
reference information and shared resources.
To generate appropriate information you will
need to understand the project definitions See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand how
around level of information need, the information transitions between states in the
container breakdown structure and an outline CDE
of what information is being produced by
other appointed parties/task teams which
impacts on your own activities.
You check the information containers that you

produce to make sure they are in accordance
with the project information production
methods and procedures, and against the
project information standard. Any non-
compliance needs to be addressed by the
party who originated the information. Once
the procedural aspects of the information
container have been checked, you check
the contents of the information container
to make sure that it meets the information
requirements and is in accordance with the
level of information need.
You then take part in a delivery team-wide

review of the information model. The process
of checking your own information and
team-wide review can be repeated many
times during the production of information
leading up to delivery of the information
model to the appointing party. At each point
of this iterative process, you have to make
the agreed changes to your information
containers.
Activity focus: For your primary actions as an

Your level of involvement across ISO 19650-2 appointed party/task team refer to
clause 5, as an appointed party is as follows: clauses:
5.3.3 Assess task team capability and
Table 9: A
ppointed party/task team activity capacity
focus
5.4.4 Establish the task information delivery
5.1 Assessment and need (project) Nil plan
5.2 Invitation to tender 5.6.1 Check availability of reference

Nil information
(appointment)
5.3 T
ender response
Medium
(appointment) 5.6.3 Undertake quality assurance check
5.4 Appointment Medium 5.6.4 Review information and approve for

sharing
5.5 Mobilization Medium 5.7.1 Submit information model for lead
5.6 Collaborative production of appointed party authorization
High
information 5.7.3 Submit information model for
appointing party acceptance
5.7 Information model delivery High
5.8 Project close-out Nil clauses which are relevant because they
require you to be informed or to contribute to
a process:
5.3.2 Establish the delivery team’s (pre-

appointment) BIM execution plan
5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM
execution plan
5.4.2 Establish the delivery team’s detailed
responsibility matrix
delivery plan
5.5.3 Test the project’s information
production methods and procedures
5.7.2 Review and authorize the information
model
5.7.4 Review and accept the information
model
2.0 ISO 19650-2 clause 5:

analysis and activities
Note: some of the activities set out ISO 19650-2 clause 5 are
explored in detail in the ISO 19650 guidance series (A-F).
This is indicated (as appropriate) against
relevant clauses in this guidance section. The
resources referred to in ISO 19650-2 clause 5 are
also mapped out in ISO 19650 guidance A.
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.1 Assessment and need

Clause: 5.1.1 Appoint individuals to undertake the information management function
See ISO 19650 guidance A to understand more about the information management function
The primary party active Insight:
within the clause:
The appointing party is responsible for identifying and engaging one or more
Appointing party individuals (from within their organization or from a third party) to undertake the
information management function in respect of the project.
Contributing parties to
the clause: The scope of the information management function to be undertaken by the
individual(s) is also determined by the appointing party. Collectively this scope covers
n/a
all of the appointing party’s activities as described in ISO 19650-2.
When the activity within It is important that whoever undertakes the information management function has the
the clause should be appropriate knowledge and skills required.
carried out:
A lead appointed party could in theory, carry out some or all of the information
As early as possible management function. It is suggested that an individual (or individuals) carrying out
The level of the activity: the information management function on behalf of the appointing party should not
be carrying out the lead appointed party’s own information management function.
Project
The Information Management Assignment Matrix in ISO 19650-2 Annex A offers
a template for clarifying which activities will be undertaken by the individual(s)
engaged to undertake the information management function.
Note: Where there is limited knowledge and capability internally, it may be

preferable to appoint a third party in an advisory role to support the information
management function. Ownership should however remain with individuals within the
appointing party’s organization who understand the business operating model and
desired outcomes
Summary of activities within the clause:

• Consider the scope of the information management function
• Determine how the scope will be resourced
• C
omplete the information management assignment matrix to appropriately allocate appointing party
responsibilities and activities
• W
here the information management function is to be delivered by a third party or a lead appointed party,
ensure that the scope of their appointment suitably reflects the activities and responsibilities assigned to them
ISO 19650-2 related clauses
5.1 Information management process – Assessment and need
5.2 Information management process – Invitation to tender
5.3.1 Nominate individuals to undertake the information management function
5.4.1 (e) Confirm the delivery team’s BIM execution plan
5.4.5 Establish the master information delivery plan
5.4.6 Complete lead appointed party’s appointment documents
5.7.4 Review and accept the information model
5.8 Information management process – Project close-out
Annex A
Clause: 5.1.2 Establish the project’s information requirements

See ISO 19650 guidance D to understand more about information requirements
within the clause:
Project information requirements (PIR) are defined by the appointing party. They
Appointing party identify the information needed to satisfy strategic objectives at key decision points
Contributing parties to the during a design and construction project. They inform the exchange information
clause: requirements (EIR), which are appointment, not project based. It is important that PIR
are appropriately defined since they are fundamental to the robustness of the EIR and
n/a the delivery of the information needed. Note that the PIR are not expressed in tender
When the activity within or appointment content.
the clause should be During the project the appointing party needs to understand:
carried out:
a. The purposes for which information is required. For example to support the
Before tendering the first organization or the asset to function or to enable the design and construction
lead appointed party project to progress to the next stage
appointment
b. The information which will be required for those purposes
The level of the activity:
The way that the information is identified might depend on the knowledge of the
Project appointing party and the nature of the decisions that are to be made. The appointing
Summary of activities party may know precisely what information is required but equally they might not.
within the clause (as
appropriate) For example if a key decision to progress to the next stage is related to whether
construction can be completed by a specific date, the PIR might identify that
• Reflect on ISO 19650-1 construction programme information is required for board review. Alternatively, if
clause 5.4 (not clause 5.3 the decision to progress to the next stage is related to a broader area, say: the safe
as suggested in clause construction and operation of the asset, then the PIR might identify that information
5.1.2) is needed to demonstrate that the design is safe to construct and operate.
• C
onsider the points as Clause 5.1.2 lists seven points of consideration for establishing project information
set out in ISO 19650-2 requirements:
clause 5.1.2
1. The project scope. Basic information about the project.
• C
onclude which points
are relevant 2. The intended purpose for which the information will be used by the appointing party
• Generate text to reflect The reasons why information is required by the appointing party during the project.
content for each relevant A list of possible purposes is set out in ISO 19650-1 clause 5.1.
consideration 3. T
he project plan of work
How the project will be broken down into stages or intervals.
4. T
he intended procurement route
How appointments/contracts will be structured, the relationships between parties
and the rules that govern a project.
5. T
he number of key decision points throughout the project
The points during a project where the appointing party requires information to make
informed decisions.
6. The decisions that the appointing party needs to make at each key decision point
Decisions that an appointing party may be required to make during a project to
achieved the desired outcomes, ensure project progression and/or to feed back into
wider organization strategies.
7. The questions to which the appointing party needs answers, to make informed
decisions
These questions provide a check to ensure that decisions can be made using the
information provided.
If the appointing party concludes that some of these points are not relevant or do not
aid beneficial communication of the PIR then there is no requirement to do anything
beyond ‘consider’ and document that no further action is needed.
ISO 19650-2 related clauses:
5.1.3 Establish the project’s information delivery milestones
5.1.4 Establish the project’s information standard
5.1.5 Establish the project’s information production methods and procedures
5.2.1 Establish the appointing party’s exchange information requirements
Clause: 5.1.3 Establish the project’s information delivery milestones

within the clause:
Information delivery milestones are defined to determine when information models
Appointing party will be exchanged from the delivery team to the appointing party and/or between
Contributing parties to delivery teams.
the clause: Clause 5.1.3 identifies four key considerations for determining information delivery
n/a milestones. They require the appointing party to think about the information
When the activity within needed for their own purposes plus information delivery obligations they might have
the clause should be themselves. The latter is particularly relevant where a programme of works is being
carried out: delivered, where a project might consist of separate enabling works and construction
Before tendering the first contracts or where a traditional procurement approach is adopted.
lead appointed party Information delivery milestones should be programmed such that they support key
appointment decision points and project progression. However, given the point at which milestones
The level of the activity: are determined they are unlikely to be date specific. It may be appropriate to
Project position the milestones within or at the end of project stages.
Summary of activities within the clause (as appropriate)

n/a
5.2.4 Compile invitation to tender information
5.3.6 Establish the delivery team’s risk register
5.4.2 Establish the delivery team’s detailed responsibility matrix
5.4.3 Establish the lead appointed party’s exchange information requirements
5.4.4 Establish the task information delivery plan(s)
Clause: 5.1.4 Establish the project’s information standard

within the clause:
When establishing the information standard, the appointing party considers:
Appointing party
xchange of Information: What standardized elements for exchanging information
E
Contributing parties to have been established for the project.
the clause:
n/a For example, the information standard may establish project-specific codes
to support the national annex information container naming convention and
When the activity within the permitted values for metadata fields. It may also specify the naming and
the clause should be
numbering systems for elements such as: Components, Types, Systems, Storeys, and
carried out:
Spaces.
Before tendering the first
lead appointed party tructuring and classification of Information: What work breakdown structures and
S
appointment classification system(s) have been established for the project.
The level of the activity: For example, the information standard may establish a work breakdown structure
Project based on a classification system (such as Uniclass 2015), a schedule of packages, or
other criteria.
ethod of specifying level of information need: What method of describing the level
M
of information need has been established for the project.
For example, the information standard may establish that the NBS level of definition
convention shall be used. In which case it will likely either cross-reference to an
external source or include the textual description and an associated code for each
level of detail and level of information.
se of information during the operational phase: What standardized elements for

U
operational use have been established for the project.
For example, the information standard may establish additional information that
should be incorporated such as the use of NRM3 codes in addition to Uniclass 2015
classification.
It should be noted that as the information standard is project-specific, some of the
established information standards may not be applicable depending on the nature of
the appointment.
For example, additional handover information may be included within the
information standard which are not relevant for an appointment to produce a
concept design.
Remember that the information standard is set out at a project rather than
appointment level. Its amalgamation with the information production methods
and procedures may prove beneficial as both are project-specific and often used
in tandem (unlike the exchange information requirements, which is an appointment
specific resource).
Summary of activities within the clause (as appropriate):

n/a
5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM execution plan
5.4.7 Complete appointed party’s appointment documents
5.6.3 Undertake quality assurance check
Clause: 5.1.5 Establish the project’s information production methods and procedures
within the clause:
When establishing the information production methods and procedures, the
Appointing party appointing party considers:
Contributing parties to Capture of existing asset information: How existing information will be captured.
the clause:
n/a For example, the information production methods and procedures may establish
what properties need to be captured about existing asset information, the permitted
When the activity within values, or measurement units. It may also specify which information container(s) this
information is captured within.
carried out:
Before tendering the first eneration, review or approval of new information: How information is produced,
G
lead appointed party reviewed or approved.
appointment
For example, the information production methods and procedures may establish that
The level of the activity: information should be produced within a specified software application. It may also
Project specify how to review information by providing a procedure or a specific workflow to
be followed.
ecurity or distribution of information: How to implement specific security

S
requirements or how to share information.
For example, the information production methods and procedures may establish
that additional meta-data relating to a security rating should be applied to all
information containers. It may also specify the common data environment (CDE)
solution to be used for the distribution of information.
elivery of information to the appointing party: How information is provided to the

D
appointing party.
For example, the information production methods and procedures may establish
what procedure to follow when delivering information such as whether additional
checks are required or if an additional CDE solution is to be used.
It should be noted that as the information production methods and procedures are
project-specific, some of the established production methods and procedures may not
all apply to all appointed parties.
For example, additional handover procedures may be included within the information
production methods and procedures which are not relevant for an appointment to
produce a concept design.
Remember that the information production methods and procedures are set out at
project rather than appointment level. Its amalgamation with the standard may prove
beneficial as both are project-specific and often used in tandem (unlike the exchange
information requirements, which is an appointment specific resource).
n/a
5.2.4 Compile the invitation to tender information
5.3.2 Establish the delivery team’s (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan
5.6.4 Review information and approve for sharing
Clause: 5.1.6 Establish the project’s reference information and shared resources
within the clause:
The appointing party considers existing reference information and shared resources to
Appointing party support tender of all appointed parties.
Contributing parties to Reference information could be relevant to the overall project, such as Ordnance
the clause: Survey mapping or information relating to adjacent assets and/or utilities owned by
n/a other organizations. Reference information could also be selected information from
When the activity within the existing asset information model, such as low-temperature hot water and chilled
the clause should be water schematics or layouts to be used in an office refurbishment project.
carried out: In addition, reference information may include the information delivered during
Before tendering the first a preceding appointment, usually by a different delivery team. For example,
lead appointed party performance specifications prepared by the appointing party’s design team
appointment for tendering a design and build contract. It is possible for a prospective lead
The level of the activity: appointed party to receive reference information that it produced itself in a previous
Project appointment, for example a masterplan produced by multi-disciplinary practice X
would be reference information for the subsequent design development package that
the same practice is bidding for along with a number of other practices.
Not providing reference information means that prospective lead appointed parties
are likely to either include costs to generate it themselves, or include a risk allowance
in their pricing, or both. Alternatively, in ignorance, they may proceed on the basis
of incomplete reference information which may ultimately impact the quality of
their deliverable, through no fault of their own. These are the kinds of unnecessary
costs and pitfalls that information management according to the ISO 19650 series is
intended to avoid.
Shared resources can take many forms, such as document templates, 3D object
libraries or custom line styles and clause 5.1.6 provides examples.
To provide a practical illustration the client might provide a template for the BIM
execution plan, to be used by all prospective lead appointed parties, to make sure
that this part of each tender submission is structured in the same way and can be
consistently evaluated.
Finally, an important consideration for both reference information and shared

information is the use of open data standards.

n/a
5.2.1 (c) Establish the appointing party’s exchange information requirements
5.2.2 Assemble reference information and shared resources
5.6.1 Check availability of reference information and shared resources
Clause: 5.1.7 Establish the project’s common data environment

See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand more about the common data environment
within the clause:
Before any information can be exchanged between the appointing party and their
Appointing party delivery team(s), a set of workflows and exchange solutions must be agreed and
Contributing parties to the implemented that form the common data environment (CDE). A workflow may
clause: for example, include the approval process and timescales, a solution may be a file
management system.
n/a
The appointing party is accountable for ensuring this CDE is implemented, configured
When the activity within and supported throughout the project. They may delegate this to a third party but it
the clause should be should be in place to enable tender information to be shared (and therefore before
carried out: issuing tender information to any prospective lead appointed party). It is therefore not
Before tendering the first practical to delegate this activity to a prospective lead appointed party at this stage.
lead appointed party
appointment It is however, acceptable to transition hosting, managing and supporting of the CDE
to a lead appointed party after appointment but “transitioning” is the operative word
The level of the activity: as it must be functional before transitioning.
Project When implementing the CDE, it must enable:
• E
ach information container to have a unique ID, based upon an agreed and
Summary of activities documented convention comprised of fields separated by a delimiter
within the clause (as
appropriate): For example: ensuring the chosen CDE solution is configured in line with the UK
• Appointing party to National Annex clauses NA.2 and NA.3 contained in ISO 19650-2
determine whether
• E
ach field to be assigned a value from an agreed and documented codification
they have the in-house
standard
capability to deliver a
CDE solution or whether For example: the CDE solution helps users find information quickly like model files
it has to be delivered by by searching for the Type M3 or CR (refer to National Annex clause NA.3.6
a third party
contained in ISO 19650-2)
• C
onfigure the CDE to
implement the project’s • E
ach information container to have the following attributes assigned; 1) status 2)
information standard revision 3) classification
and information methods
Note: the CDE solution allows additional data to be tagged to information
and procedures
containers beyond the information container unique ID to assist the project team in
their understanding of what is the latest information and how it can be used
• T
he ability for information containers to transition between states and the recording
of the name of user and date when information container revisions transition
between each state
Note: the CDE workflow can keep a detailed audit trail of each information
container’s content, status and revision activity. This can also provide clarity about
what and when sign off is required before a transition can take place.
• Controlled access at an information container level
For example: the CDE solution and workflow can allow configuration that restricts
access to information containers that have not reached a sufficient level of maturity
or are too sensitive for specific organizations or individuals to have access to them

5.1.8 Establish the project’s information protocol
5.7.1 Submit and authorize the information model
5.7.3 Submit information model for appointing party acceptance
National Annex
Clause: 5.1.8 Establish the project’s information protocol

An information protocol that is compliant with BS EN ISO 19650 is available via the UK BIM Framework
within the clause:
Each appointment must contain an information protocol, i.e. all lead appointed party’s
Appointing party appointments and all appointed parties’ appointments.
Contributing parties to The lead appointed party’s appointment will contain the project’s information
the clause: protocol, and this will be included in the appointed party’s appointment documents
n/a with any appropriate differences to reflect each appointment.
When the activity within

carried out:
Before tendering the first
appointment

Project

n/a
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.2 Invitation to tender
Clause: 5.2.1 Establish the appointing party’s exchange information requirements

within the clause:
Comprehensive and properly managed exchange information requirements (EIR) are
Appointing party fundamental to successful information management. They provide the framework for
Contributing parties to each and every delivery team active within a project.
the clause: Each EIR is a specification detailing the information required by the appointing party
n/a for all information exchanges with a lead appointed party.
There are several activities in clause 5.2.1 which the appointing party needs to work
When the activity within through to ensure each EIR is fully defined.
carried out: Each EIR is derived from the project information requirements (PIR) (which includes
Before tendering a the organizational information requirements) and the asset information requirements
lead appointed party (AIR).
appointment
Once the PIR and the AIR are identified, they are broken-down to a more granular
The level of the activity: level as EIR relative to the lead appointed party’s scope of works, and each
information requirement is associated with a level of information need. This enables
Appointment
the appropriate facets of information to be defined. In addition, the EIR establishes
information exchange dates relative to delivery milestones to ensure information is
delivered at the right time.
Each EIR is appointment specific and included within invitation to tender
documentation. An EIR is read in conjunction with the project’s information standard
and information production methods and procedures (see ISO 19650-1 clause 5.5).
For example: as part of the PIR (see insight clause 5.1.2) one of the purposes for
information is to support the ongoing progression of the project. Within the EIR the
appointing party identifies that the information required is a construction
programme report which summarizes where the programme is ahead/ behind
schedule in PDF format.
For example: from the AIR the appointing party requires asset information for
maintenance purposes which will feed into their facilities management system. For
this they specify in the EIR the exact information required against the relevant
asset(s) which enables it to be imported into their system.
During project delivery each EIR provides the mechanism for reviewing and accepting
information models for the duration of the associated lead appointed party
appointment.

n/a
5.1.2 Establish the project’s information requirements
5.2.3 Establish tender response requirements and evaluation criteria
5.3.3 Assess task team capability and capacity
5.7.2 Review and authorize the information model
Clause: 5.2.2 Assemble reference information and shared resources

within the clause:
Reference information and shared resources should be provided in appropriate
Appointing party information containers via the project’s common data environment (CDE).
Contributing parties to During the tender process, access to these information containers by prospective
the clause: lead appointed parties has to be managed by the appointing party. This is to make
n/a sure that prospective lead appointed parties do not have inappropriate access to
any other information being shared by existing delivery teams on the project. The
When the activity within information containers in the CDE should have status codes (to identify the permitted
the clause should be use of the information), revision codes and classification codes to help prospective
carried out: lead appointed parties use them correctly.
Before tendering each
appointment

Appointment
Summary of activities within the clause (as appropriate)
• Upload reference information and shared resources to the CDE in accordance with the project’s information
standard and production methods and procedures and give prospective lead appointed parties appropriate
access and permissions to that content
• Revoke CDE access for prospective lead appointed parties who are not successful in their tender response.

5.1.6 Establish the project’s reference information and shared resources
Clause: 5.2.3 Establish tender response requirements and evaluation criteria

within the clause:
The appointing party determines the minimum requirements that the prospective lead
Appointing party appointed party is to meet and communicate in their tender response. At the same
time, the appointing party establishes how they will evaluate the effectiveness with
Contributing parties to which these minimum requirements are addressed in tender responses received.
the clause:
n/a This provides the prospective lead appointed party with a degree of direction about
what they should detail in their tender response and enables consistent and fair
evaluation of tenders received.
the clause should be Key considerations are likely to be:
carried out:
• The required content of the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan
lead appointed party For example: does the BIM execution plan sufficiently detail the delivery team’s
appointment proposed federation strategy, is it feasible and practical?
The level of the activity: • T

he competency, capability and capacity of the prospective lead appointed party
to deliver the information requirements
Appointment
For example: does the prospective lead appointed party have suitable skills to
manage and deliver the information requirements and crucially are the people with
those skills available for the duration of the appointment?
• H
ow the project delivery team will be mobilized, thinking about getting resources
and technology ready to go. The appointing party will want to establish that
the lead appointed party has a mobilization plan in place to get the delivery
team up and running so that information can be produced in a co-ordinated and
collaborative manner in support of the delivery team’s programme. The appointing
party will also want to establish that delivery will not begin until the plan has been
fully enacted.
• T
he prospective lead appointed party’s consideration of information delivery
risk. This is communicated via a risk register, compiled by the prospective lead
appointed party in respect of the delivery team.
Minimum requirements might take the form of questions to be addressed in the
tender response.
For example: please explain how you will manage and mitigate risk associated with
information delivery?
Ensure use of appointment specific questions that are relevant to the appointment
within the context of the project, and the scope of works to be undertaken by the
delivery team. Evaluation criteria should be measurable.

• Establish minimum requirements to be addressed within the prospective lead appointed party’s tender response
• Identify how the tender response will be evaluated

Clause: 5.2.4 Compile invitation to tender information

within the clause:
The tender contents for information management should be combined with other
Appointing party tender information being issued to the same prospective lead appointed party, such
as technical specifications for the works and the requirements for completing technical
proposals.
the clause:
n/a
carried out:
appointment

Appointment

n/a

5.2.3 Establish the tender response requirements and evaluation criteria
5.3.7 Compile the delivery team’s tender response
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.3 Tender response
Clause: 5.3.1 Nominate individuals to undertake the information management function

See ISO 19650 guidance A to understand more about the information management function
within the clause: Clause 5.3.1 is the appointment level equivalent of clause 5.1.1 (the project-wide
Prospective lead appointed appointment of individuals to undertake the information management function).
party [please note there This part of the information management function describes the activities and tasks
is a typographical error in undertaken within a delivery team.
clause 5.3.1 paragraph 3,
The activities making up the information management function vary in complexity and
which should refer to the
effort. Therefore, it may be appropriate to break down more demanding activities
lead appointed party not
into tasks so more than one individual can be nominated with responsibility for the
the appointing party]
delivery of the activity. It is important that the individuals nominated have the
appropriate knowledge and skills required to undertake the activities assigned.
the clause: The aim should be to upskill and self-deliver wherever possible to ensure information
management capabilities mature within organizations. However, this clause does allow
n/a
for a lead appointed party to appoint another organization (an appointed party or a
When the activity within third party) to do this on their behalf.
the clause should be If the prospective lead appointed party has already been appointed by the
carried out: appointing party to undertake some or all of its information management function,
During tender response then the potential conflict of interest has to be avoided, for example by employing
different individuals.
Appointment

n/a
5.1.1 Appoint individuals to undertake the information management function (project level)
5.3.4 Establish the delivery team’s capability and capacity
5.3.5 Establish the delivery team’s mobilization plan
Clause: 5.3.2 Establish the delivery team’s (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan
See ISO 19650 guidance E to understand more about the BIM execution plan
within the clause:
The BIM execution plan is defined in ISO 19650-2 clause 3.1.3.1. The (pre-
Prospective lead appointed appointment) BIM execution plan is established by a prospective lead appointed
party party on behalf of the delivery team and is included in their tender response. The
provision of the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan is a requirement of ISO 19650-
Contributing parties to 2.
the clause:
Clause 5.3.2 identifies seven areas that the prospective lead appointed party should
n/a
consider in establishing their (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan. However, it is
important to understand what the appointing party expects the (pre-appointment)
When the activity within BIM execution plan to contain and to cover this accordingly. Note that the appointing
the clause should be party may have their own BIM execution plan template, which should comply with ISO
carried out: 19650-2. Assuming this is the case, this template should be made available as part of
Any prospective appointed the invitation to tender documentation.
parties that are known at
this time Establishing the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan should involve collaboration
with prospective appointed parties (anticipated members of the delivery team) where
known, so that it reflects what the delivery team as a whole will do, not simply what
The level of the activity: the lead appointed party will do, or would like prospective appointed parties to do.
Appointment The (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan provides an opportunity for the
prospective lead appointed party to identify additions and/or amendments to the
project’s production methods and procedures and its information standard. This
might be needed so that:
• Information can be effectively generated, reviewed, approved, authorized and
exchanged by the different parties involved, and
• Distribution and delivery of information is secure and effective

• Understand the appointing party’s minimum requirements for the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan and how
it will be evaluated
• Establish if the appointing party has a BIM execution plan template that should be populated
• C
heck the project’s production methods and procedures and its information standard. Identify any required
additions or amendments
• Consider the contents requirements as set out in ISO 19650-2 clause 5.3.2
• C
ollaborate with prospective appointed parties so that the contents of the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan
reasonably reflects what the delivery team will do
• Populate the BIM execution plan

5.1.6 (b)Establish the project’s reference information and shared resources
Clause: 5.3.3 Assess task team capability and capacity

within the clause:
When assessing their capability and capacity, each task team shall consider:
Prospective task team(s)/
appointed parties The task team’s capability and capacity to manage information
Contributing parties to For example: the BIM execution plan’s information delivery strategy identifies the use
the clause: of a specific software package to manage information. Do the members of the task
n/a team have experience in managing their information using this software?
The task team’s capability and capacity to produce information

the clause should be For example: the project’s information production methods and procedures describe
carried out: several production methods including space, object type and object component
During (or prior to) naming conventions. Do the members of the task team have experience in producing
preparation of the tender their information following these methods?
response
The availability of IT within the task team
For example: can the hardware, software and IT infrastructure available to the task
Appointment
team meet the information delivery strategy? If not, the task team would need to
describe how they intend to meet the information delivery strategy.
It is important to accurately assess task team capability and capacity and to be able
to provide evidence if necessary.
In addition, while ISO 19650-2 identifies this as a task team activity, task teams can
seek certification as a means of demonstrating capability through an independent
third party.

n/a
Clause: 5.3.4 Establish the delivery team’s capability and capacity

within the clause: There is no Insight for this clause
Prospective lead appointed
party
the clause:
Prospective task teams/
appointed parties

carried out:
During preparation of the
tender response

Appointment

n/a
Clause: 5.3.5 Establish the delivery team’s mobilization plan

within the clause: The mobilization plan serves two purposes:
1. It informs the appointing party of the lead appointed party’s approach to
party
information management mobilization.
Contributing parties to 2. It is a tool for the lead appointed party to sufficiently plan out their mobilization
the clause: phase for information management after appointment.
appointed parties The mobilization plan may take different forms for example: a schedule, a table or
even a Gantt chart.
When the activity within ISO 19650-2 requires the lead appointed party to consider 11 elements covering
testing of information exchange and delivery, common data environments, other
carried out:
software and hardware requirements and training and education. The plan may
During preparation of the include:
tender response
• Ensuring export file formats are consistent and coherent.
The level of the activity: • T
esting that the delivery team’s common data environment (CDE) solutions
Appointment perform as expected and that all appointed parties and task teams can access the
CDE appropriately.
• T
esting that project CDE solutions perform as expected and that all key parties
can access it as required. Project CDE solutions should also support all CDE
workflows including ensuring acceptance mechanisms work as anticipated
• T
esting how information containers may manually or automatically exchange
between solutions depending on workflow to reduce review waiting times
• E
nsuring site office ICT infrastructure including network lines are in place to allow
site staff to access information.
• P
roducing information management plans or guides to help users operate the CDE
solutions
• E
ducating the delivery team on the project goals and the journey to get there and
training the delivery team on the use of any mandatory solutions being provided
by the appointing party
• R
ecruiting of members that play a vital role in the management of information
including document/design managers and consultants
• S
upporting individuals and organizations that join the delivery team during the
appointment
For example – the mobilization plan could describe a series of information

management workshops with new appointed parties as part of their project induction

n/a

5.5.3 Test the project’s information production methods and procedures
Clause: 5.3.6 Establish the delivery team’s risk register

within the clause: ISO 19650-2 sets out the criteria for the prospective lead appointed party to include in
Prospective lead appointed their delivery team’s risk register.
party
For example: the appointing party could specify submission of a sub selection of red
Contributing parties to the
clause: risks from the delivery team’s risk register. The appointing party may wish to share
their current perceived risks that are relevant to delivery as part of the invitation to
tender.
appointed parties
When the activity within Note that all parties may have internal risk registers that highlight their own perceived
the clause should be risks. These may have additional risks listed relevant to that party’s internal operations
carried out: and risk management.
For example, a lead appointed party may have a corporate risk register that outlines
tender response
the commercial risks of delivering a common data environment (CDE) and committing
The level of the activity: to service level agreements. This aspect could be reflected in the delivery team’s risk
Appointment register.
It is suggested that an integrated risk register is generated which includes the

information management risks alongside other appointment related risks.
Risks to consider including in the delivery team’s risk register could, for example,
include the following:
Assumptions
1. Existence, gaps and adequacy of the EIR received, and the steps needed to address
these concerns.
2. Impact of roles and responsibilities for information management and how
appointing party information requirements are being captured.
3. Information related risks should be integrated into a single risk register.
For example, the BEP should not feature a supplementary risk register.
Milestones
1. Consider whether there is sufficient capability and capacity to meet the delivery
milestones.
2. Consider project specific procurement risks. Such as the procurement lead times of
telecommunications for project sites.
Information Protocol
1. Consider whether the rights and responsibilities in the protocol are acceptable from
legal and commercial perspectives.
2. Existence, gaps and adequacy of the protocol addressing elements listed in clause
5.1.8.
Information Delivery Strategy
1. Consider whether an appropriate CDE has been established and its capability to
deliver the information delivery strategy
2. That all relevant documentation has been agreed by the delivery team and
appointing party and communicated to all task teams as appropriate
3. That the level of information need is defined and agreed for each information
exchange requirement
4. Impact of the information model federation strategy and its configuration within
the CDE
5. Consider whether the mobilization phase includes all configured production
templates is undertaken, tested and confirmed.
Clause: 5.3.6 Establish the delivery team’s risk register

Insight continued:
Methods, Procedures and Information Standards

1. Consider the proposed methods and procedures against existing organization/
internal procedures.
2. Consider the impact of any deviations from existing processes.
3. Consider whether the proposed methods and procedures are feasible and
achievable.
4. Assess whether the appointment / invitation to tender manages change
appropriately, including ongoing amendment to appointment information
management documentation.
5. Consider whether compliance criteria are measurable.
Mobilization, capability and capacity

1. Assess the impact of communication of the mobilization plan.
2. Ensure consideration for lead times is included in mobilization, for example:
a. CDE procurement
b. Internet connections / Internet service provision
c. System configuration
d. Training providers
e. CDE testing
3. Assess the impact of a negative outcome from testing information production
methods and procedures.
The actual list will depend on the specific requirements of the appointment.

• Identify and assess risks associated with information management and information production
• Decide how to combine information management risks with the other risks being identified

Clause: 5.3.7 Compile the delivery team’s tender response

within the clause:
There is no Insight for this clause
party
the clause:
n/a

carried out:
tender response

Appointment
n/a

ISO 19650-2 clause 5.4 Appointment
Clause: 5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM execution plan

See ISO 19650 guidance E to understand more about the BIM execution plan
within the clause:
The BIM execution plan should be developed and agreed with each appointed party,
Lead appointed party both those known to the lead appointed party and those that will be appointed
during the delivery team’s work. This is to ensure that it reflects their activities,
Contributing parties to their use of IT and that they can work in accordance with the overall delivery team
the clause: requirements.
Appointing party and
appointed parties Development of content may also require engagement with the appointing party to
agree any necessary additions or amendments to the project’s information standard
or the project’s information production methods and procedures.
the clause should be Note that the language of this clause is different from clause 5.3.2 (pre-appointment
carried out: BIM execution plan). Clause 5.3.2 lists items to be ‘considered’, but clause 5.4.1 lists
During completion of the items that the lead appointed party ‘shall’ do. Some of the items are ‘as required’,
appointment and this means: check what was in the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan and
update it if the information no longer reflects the current/planned delivery team
approach.
Appointment It is also important to make sure the BIM execution plan meets the minimum content
requirements of the appointing party and fits into their template (clauses 5.1.6 (b) and
5.2.4) if they have one.
A BIM execution plan is likely to evolve over the life of the delivery team as
additional parties are appointed. The lead appointed party is responsible for
maintaining the delivery team’s BIM execution plan so that it continues to represent
the team’s information management approach. As the BIM execution plan is an
appointment (contract) document it will need to be subject to a process of formal
change control with changes agreed with the appointing party and the appointed
parties.
A key recommendation is that the BIM execution plan is simple and concise so that it
can be easily understood, implemented, assured and maintained.
• Reference back to the (pre-appointment) BIM execution plan. Reflect on the content and any feedback from the
appointing party generated through the tender evaluation process and change as necessary
• Check the project’s information standard
• Collaborate with appointed parties to ensure you collectively agree on the:
• information delivery strategy
• responsibility matrix,
• the information standard, and the
• proposed information production methods and procedures
At this point you should also confirm IT proposals
• Engage with the appointing party to agree any additions or amendments to the project’s information standard
or information production methods and procedures
• Update the information delivery strategy and high-level responsibility matrix as required
• Submit to the appointing party for inclusion in the appointment documents
5.1.6(b) Establish the project’s reference information and shared resources
Clause: 5.4.2 Establish the delivery team’s detailed responsibility matrix

See ISO 19650 guidance F to understand more about the responsibility matrices
within the clause:
Produced from the initial high-level responsibility matrix, a detailed responsibility
Lead appointed party matrix identifies:
Contributing parties to What information is to be produced;
the clause:
Appointed parties For example: the detailed responsibility matrix may identify, based on the
information container breakdown structure, that information about doors should be
When the activity within provided and quantify how much information is required
carried out: When the information is to be exchanged and with whom;
During completion of the For example: the detailed responsibility matrix may identify which delivery milestone
appointment this information is needed by; taking into account any dependencies identified by the
delivery team.
Appointment Which task team is responsible for its production.
For example: the detailed responsibility matrix may show that “ABC Architects” is
responsible for providing this information.
Whilst preparing the detailed responsibility matrix, it is important to bear in mind that
the task information delivery plans and master information delivery plan are governed
by the rules set by the matrix, but will be working at an information container
level. However, the detailed responsibility matrix must refer back to the exchange
information requirements received from the appointing party, to be clear how each
requirement is being met.
n/a
Clause: 5.4.3 Establish the lead appointed party’s exchange information requirements
within the clause:
The lead appointed party should define a set of exchange information requirements
Lead appointed party (EIR) for each appointment it makes just like the appointing party does (see ISO
19650-2, 5.2.1).
the clause: Each EIR should detail the information required by the lead appointed party from
n/a the appointed party. This may include relevant aspects of appointing party’s EIR,
creating a cascade throughout the supply chain. These are detailed requirements and
should be defined around the concept of the level of information need to ensure all
facets of information are captured.
carried out: For example: a tier 1 contractor manages programme and cost; therefore, they may
During completion of the require specific information from certain sub-contractors to enable them to carry out
appointment these tasks.
The level of the activity: In addition, the appointing party may require asset information for maintenance
Appointment purposes which will be delivered by certain sub-contractors.
This information is included within the lead appointed party’s exchange information
requirements and hence the tender information for the relevant sub-contractors.
During project delivery the exchange information requirements provide the mechanism
for the lead appointed party to authorize information models.

Clause 5.4.3 provides step by step detail of activities required

5.5.2 Mobilize technology
Clause: 5.4.4 Establish the task information delivery plan(s)

See ISO 19650 guidance F to understand more about information delivery plans
within the clause: A Task Information Delivery Plan (TIDP) is a detailed plan for how a particular
Appointed party task team is going to deliver the information it has been asked to provide (models,
documents, schedules, calculations, and so on).
Contributing parties to There is no prescribed format for the TIDP. It lends itself to being produced as a
the clause: table, or in a spreadsheet, database or even in an annotated Gantt chart.
n/a
A TIDP has certain minimum contents, defined in ISO 19650-2 clause 5.4.4 paragraph
3. These details are provided for each information container that the task team
When the activity within will be delivering. Because of this, a TIDP could be a lengthy resource, with details
the clause should be covering the “what”, and the potential multiple “when’s”, if information containers are
carried out:
to be shared repeatedly during their development.
During completion of
and then throughout the The purpose of doing this activity from the task team’s perspective is to enable
appointment them to clarify what they will and will not deliver as part of their scope and what
information will need to be exchanged between them and other task teams to allow
The level of the activity: timely coordination and progress across the delivery team.
Appointment

n/a
Clause: 5.4.5 Establish the master information delivery plan

See ISO 19650 guidance F to understand more about information delivery plans
within the clause: The master information delivery plan (MIDP) is the compilation of all the task
Lead appointed party information delivery plans (TIDPs) within a delivery team. Its purpose is to allow the
lead appointed party to check the delivery plans across different task teams, to make
Contributing parties to sure these fit with the overall delivery team schedule of activities and to make sure
the clause: that any related deliverables are in the right logical sequence.
Appointed parties There is no minimum list of contents for an MIDP provided in ISO 19650-2. However,
as an MIDP is a collation of TIDPs then the contents list of a TIDP is a good starting
When the activity within point. Whilst the information author responsible for an information container
the clause should be production is specified, the task team actually responsible for each information
carried out: container could also be a valuable feature to add to the MIDP contents list.
During completion of A delivery team’s MIDP has to be kept up to date with any changes in the individual
and then throughout the TIDPs that form part of it. It should also be updated to include additional TIDPs
appointment from new appointed parties/task teams joining the delivery team.

Appointment

n/a

Clause: 5.4.6 Complete lead appointed party’s appointment documents

within the clause: It is important that each of the five resources listed are included within the lead
Appointing party appointed party’s appointment documents. The appointing party may find it helpful
to clarify to its legal representatives preparing the appointment that some of the
Contributing parties to resource content may changing/evolve throughout the appointment so this can be
the clause: incorporated correctly within the appointment documents.

carried out:
During completion of the
appointment

Appointment

n/a
Clause: 5.4.7 Complete appointed party’s appointment documents

The primary party Insight:
active within the clause: It is important that each of the five resources listed are included within the
Lead appointed party appointed party’s appointment documents. The information protocol contained
in the appointed party’s appointment documents will usually be the same as that in
Contributing parties to the lead appointed party’s appointment documents, with any relevant changes to
the clause: reflect their particular appointment.
Appointed party
When the activity

within the clause should
be carried out:
During completion of the
appointment
The level of the

activity:
Appointment

n/a

5.4.4 Establish the task information delivery plan
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.5 Mobilization
Clause: 5.5.1 Mobilize resources

within the clause:
The alignment of an activity with a documented process is a common theme
Lead appointed party throughout the ISO 19650 series. The mobilization activities should therefore follow
the mobilization plan submitted with the delivery team’s tender response (see ISO
Contributing parties to 19650-2 clauses 5.3.5 and 5.3.7).
the clause:
ISO 19650 clause 5.5.1 addresses the mobilization of resources covering individuals
Task team(s)/appointed
parties specifically. The mobilization activity should result in individuals being available,
educated and trained such that they can generate information and deliver the
information model for authorization and acceptance.
the clause should be Mobilization of resources covers three core activities which are set out in clause 5.5.1.
carried out:
Confirm the resource availability of each task team
Before any information is
generated within a task For example: Are the individuals carrying out the information management function,
team as well as all the information authors named in the task information delivery plan
(TIDP), available? Remember the hidden resources ‘the back of house’ needed to
The level of the activity: support, configure and procure systems. This includes administration of common data
Appointment environment solutions and management teams.
There will be times when the intended team members are no longer available when
the appointment starts. This situation needs to be managed, by identifying and
upskilling new team members to take their place. The important aspect is to make
sure that the new team members have equivalent or better skills than those they are
replacing.
This activity should address gaps found in the assessment of task team capacity in
5.3.4 and where necessary will feed in to the next points on developing and delivering
education and training.
Develop and deliver education
The intention of this activity is to develop appointed party knowledge about the
information management resources, required processes and associated obligations.
Develop and deliver training
The intention here is to ensure that individuals are competent (skilled) to generate or
manage information.
Tip: make sure that the time for mobilization confirmed in the mobilization plan
is actually allocated to planning and implementing training. Time required could
include the lead times for training providers/content providers.
Mobilization of resources may not be a one-off activity and will need to be repeated
when new individuals join the delivery team and/or other circumstances change.
A successful outcome of 5.5.1 would be sufficient individuals who are knowledgeable
and competent to generate or manage information.
Any risks generated through this mobilization activity should be recorded in the
delivery team’s risk register.
Clause: 5.5.1 Mobilize resources

• Review the mobilization plan
• Review each TIDP
• Establish the availability of individuals
• Implement education and training as required
• Update the risk register as required
• Repeat mobilization of resources as and when necessary

5.3.4 Establish the delivery teams capability and capacity
Clause: 5.5.2 Mobilize information technology

active within the clause: As noted in the insight to clause 5.5.1, the alignment of an activity with a documented
Lead appointed party process is a common theme throughout the ISO 19650 series. The mobilization
activities should therefore follow the mobilization plan submitted with the delivery
Contributing parties to team’s tender response (see ISO 19650-2 clauses 5.3.5 and 5.3.7).
the clause: ISO 19650 clause 5.5.1 addresses the mobilization of technology – both hardware and
Appointing party and task software. It covers the common data environment (CDE) and any other technology
team(s)/appointed parties underpinning the generation and exchange of information specifically.
When the activity The mobilization activity should result in technology being in place, configured and
within the clause should suitably tested to support the generation and exchange of information between all
members of the project team. This is to ensure that information can be confidently
be carried out:
exchanged between members of the delivery team and between the appointed parties
Before any information is and the appointing party.
generated within a task
Mobilization of information technology covers five core activities which are set out in
team.
clause 5.5.2.
The level of the Procure, implement, configure and test software, hardware and IT infrastructure
activity:
Mobilization of information technology is about more than just getting the hardware
Appointment delivered - it also needs the software to be installed and it all needs to be tested. A
further consideration is ensuring that software versions and add-ons do not impact on
interoperability.
It is therefore important to ensure that the right technologies are in place and there is
enough of them (in terms of licensing for example).
Tip: it is crucial that service level agreements and terms and conditions will effectively
support the duration of the appointment (for example, consider the timing of renewal
agreements).
Configure and test the project’s common data environment (CDE)

Although the project’s CDE solution is enabled by the appointing party, the lead
appointed party has to ensure that it is tested and will support sharing and publishing
of the delivery team’s information. This requires co-operation of the appointing party.
For example, this might include testing delivery team specific work-flow, setting up
access and administration permissions.
Configure and test the delivery team’s CDE

When the delivery teams uses its own CDE solution, in addition to the project’s CDE
solution, then this too has to be configured and tested to support information sharing.
Where this is the case a crucial area to address is the connectivity to the project’s
CDE solution.
Test information exchanges between task teams
Each part of the information exchange process should be tested to ensure that
information can be effectively shared within the delivery team.
Test information delivery
Each part of the information delivery process should be tested from the delivery
team’s perspective. This is likely to require the co-operation of the appointing party.
A successful outcome of 5.5.2 would be assurance that information technology will
support the generation and management of information.
Clause: 5.5.2 Mobilize information technology

• Review the lead appointed party’s appointment documents
• Review the mobilization plan
• Review each TIDP
• R
eview the available technologies already in place plus commercial arrangement for information technologies
required or to be maintained
• Update the risk register as required
• Repeat mobilization of information technology as and when necessary
Clause: 5.5.3 Test the project’s information production methods and procedures
active within the clause: As noted in the insight to clause 5.5.1, the alignment of an activity with a documented
Lead appointed party process is a common theme throughout the ISO 19650 series. The mobilization
activities should therefore follow the mobilization plan submitted with the delivery
Contributing parties to team’s tender response (see ISO 19650-2 clauses 5.3.5 and 5.3.7).
the clause: Clause 5.5.3 is focussed on ensuring that the methods and procedures for information
Task team(s)/appointed production and exchange are understood by all members of the delivery team and
parties can be implemented from the outset of the information generation activities.
When the activity This will involve testing the project’s information production methods and procedures.
within the clause should For example, testing will include a review of the federation strategy and information
be carried out: container breakdown structure to establish that they remain appropriate. If this is
Before any information is not the case, refinement should be explored to ensure that the information container
generated within a task breakdown structure supports the federation strategy.
team.
For example, testing the visibility of information containers and the information
The level of the within them to ensure that security requirements for the management of sensitive
activity: information can be adhered to.
Appointment In thinking about information production, the lead appointed party may need to
develop shared resources for use by the delivery team.
The final activity within this clause is to ensure that the project’s information
production methods and procedures are cascaded to every task team within the
delivery team.
Although the activities within clause 5.5.3 are assigned to the lead appointed party,
they should be undertaken in a collaborative manner including all delivery team
members.
A successful outcome of 5.5.3 would be assurance that the project’s information
production methods and procedures will support the generation and management of
information.
• Review and test the project’s information production methods and procedures
• Make refinements as required
• Communicate the project’s information production methods and procedures to all task teams
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.6 Collaborative production of information
Clause: 5.6.1 Check availability of reference information and shared resources

within the clause:
Access to reference information and shared resources should be checked by each task
Task team(s)/appointed team (appointed party) when generation of information is about to start. Reference
parties information and shared resources are initially provided by the appointing party
Contributing parties to (clause 5.2.2) and can then be reviewed and extended by the lead appointed party
the clause: (clause 5.4.3 e).
n/a Reference information and shared resources are held in the project’s common data
environment (CDE) and lack of access could be caused by a number of reasons,
including:
When the activity within • The relevant information was never shared through the CDE;
carried out: • T
he task team/appointed party has not been given access rights to the
Prior to generating information, or these rights have lapsed or been revoked;
information • Relevant information was shared, but has become obsolete; or
• N
ew requirements for reference information or shared resources have arisen which
The level of the activity: are not covered by the information currently available.
Appointment Lack of access to reference information or to shared resources, for whatever reason,
should be reported to the lead appointed party as soon as possible. Ideally this should
be before the task team generates any of its own information. The task team should
also assess any impact on its information delivery plan, and report this to the lead
appointed party as well.

• R
eview what reference information and shared resources are accessible in the project’s CDE, in sufficient
time before technical work and generation of information starts, and then compare this with the task team’s
requirements.
• Report any shortfall to the lead appointed party.

5.1.6 Establish the project’s reference information and shared resources
Clause: 5.6.2 Generate information

See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand how an information container transitions between states
within the clause:
Individuals generating information (as with all members of the project team) have a
Task team(s)/appointed responsibility for robust information management.
parties
The task information delivery plan (TIDP) is the primary consideration in generating
Contributing parties to information as efficiently and effectively as possible in a collaborative manner. The
the clause: TIDP identifies which information containers an author is responsible for generating.
n/a While generating this information, the project’s information production methods and
procedures (i.e. the process for information production) and the project’s information
standard should be carefully reviewed to ensure compliance from the outset.
Note that clause 5.6.2 (b) is explicit about information that should not be generated.
carried out: This is to encourage the generation of appropriate, useful and useable information.
For example it is wasteful to produce information that exceeds the level of information
After mobilization need and/or duplicates information generated by another task team.
and throughout the
appointment An example of avoiding duplication would be the architectural task team referencing
the structural engineering containers rather than recreating structural elements in
their geometrical models.
Appointment
As well as working in accordance with ISO 19650-2, it’s important that there is
effective communication between those individuals generating information and across
the delivery team. This may be via the CDE or more informally for example, email,
online meetings or just “picking up the phone”.
When generating information that requires an element of co-ordination with other
information it’s good practice to establish regular exchanges between task teams
via the CDE. For example, geometrical models requiring co-ordination might
be exchanged on a fortnightly basis (although this frequency should be flexible
depending on the requirements of the delivery team and the project). Any co-
ordination issues should be resolved between task teams and if this is not possible, the
issue should be escalated to the lead appointed party.
• R
efer to the TIDP, the project’s information production methods and procedures and the project’s information
standard
• Generate information taking account of the level of information need described in the TIDP
• Co-ordinate information as required
• Resolve co-ordination issues, escalate if necessary
5.4.4 Establish the task information delivery plan(s)5.5.1 Mobilize resources
Clause: 5.6.3 Undertake quality assurance check

within the clause:
Checking the quality of the information container is in two parts. The first part is
Task team(s)/appointed checking the information container from the outside (in essence the wrapper). The
parties second part is checking the contents and this is dealt with in ISO 19650-2 clause 5.6.4.
Contributing parties to The project’s information production methods and procedures sets out the process for
the clause: undertaking the “outside check”. This activity might be aligned with the appointed
n/a party’s ISO 9001 Quality Management System, if that was appropriate/agreed.
The project’s information standard then determines the information container
requirements considering its:
the clause should be • Unique ID;
carried out: • Status;
Before an information
• Revision; and
container is shared
• Classification;
The level of the activity: Some checks could be carried out automatically via common data environment
Appointment workflow.
If the information container check is unsuccessful the information container should be
rejected with the information author informed of corrective action required.
Once an information container has been successfully checked and has been marked as
checked, its contents should be reviewed as set out in ISO 19650-2 clause 5.6.4.
• Review the project’s production methods and procedures
• Review the project’s information standard
• Undertake the check
• If the check is successful then mark the information container as checked
• If the check is unsuccessful reject the information container and advise the information author
5.4.7 Complete appointed party’s appointed documents
Clause: 5.6.4 Review information and approve for sharing

within the clause:
Checking the quality of the information container is in two parts. The first part is
Task team(s)/appointed checking the information container from the outside (in essence the wrapper) and this
parties is dealt with in ISO 19650-2 clause 5.6.3. The second part is checking the contents
Contributing parties to (this clause).
the clause: Following the successful quality assurance check of an information container (ISO
n/a 19650-2 clause 5.6.3), the task team undertakes a review of the information within
the container. The objective of this review is to ensure the information that is going
to be shared is in accordance with the lead appointed party’s exchange information
When the activity within requirements and the task information delivery plan (TIDP).
carried out: Tip: the TIDP may record additional information containers beyond those needed to
After the quality assurance meet the lead appointed party’s information requirements to support development
check of an information and/or coordination activities by/with other task teams.
container, and prior to The lead appointed party, in agreement with the task team(s), should have
sharing within the project established a consistent methodology for undertaking this review and will have
CDE. recorded this within the project’s information production methods and procedures.
The level of the activity: Only when a review is complete and successful can the information (within the
Appointment information container) be approved with the information container then assigned
a suitable status code for sharing. In the UK, the recommended status codes for
information containers are defined in ISO 19650-2 clause NA.4.2 (refer also to
guidance C section 6.0– About the Common Data Environment).
If the information review is unsuccessful the information container should be rejected.
A record should be made of why the review was unsuccessful plus any amendments
that need to be made to the information by the task team.
• Review the lead appointed party’s exchange information requirements and the TIDP
• Review the project’s information production methods and procedures
• Carry out the information check
• If the check is successful then approve the information container and assign the appropriate status code
• If the check is unsuccessful reject the information container and record why alongside the amendments needed
5.6.3 Undertake quality assurance checks
NA.4.2 Status
Clause: 5.6.5 Information model review

within the clause:
An important distinction between this clause and clauses 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 is that 5.6.5 is
This is a delivery team concerned with the delivery team’s information model. The preceding two clauses are
(lead appointed party plus concerned with individual information containers.
all appointed parties) wide
activity Delivery teams should plan and undertake timely information model reviews to ensure
the delivery team’s information model is continuously coordinated. The review is
Contributing parties to repeated, as necessary, until the information model is ready for authorization by the
the clause: lead appointed party.
n/a
Each review will consider the appointing party’s exchange information requirements,
acceptance criteria and the master information delivery plan (MIDP). It will be
carried out in accordance with the processes set out in the project’s information
production methods and procedures.
carried out: If the information containers in the information model do not align with the MIDP, this
As required during will indicate a breakdown in the appointment’s change control process.
information generation and It is important that the logistics to deliver and manage all information model reviews
then prior to information for each information delivery milestone, are established and reflected in the project’s
model authorization. information production methods and procedures, the BIM execution plan and the
The level of the activity: MIDP.
Appointment

• Review the BIM execution plan
• Review the MIDP
• Identify the information containers for review using the information container status code
• Review the information model
5.4.6.Complete lead appointed party’s appointment document
5.7.1 Submit information model for lead appointed party authorization
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.7 Information model delivery
Clause: 5.7.1 Submit information model for lead appointed party authorization
within the clause:
This clause is the first step in the process of delivering the information model as an
Task team(s)/appointed information exchange to the appointing party and having it accepted as Published
parties information. Each task team seeks the lead appointed party’s authorization of their
Contributing parties to relevant information containers.
the clause: The process of submission should be in accordance with project’s information
n/a production methods and procedures.
In line with the UK National Annex, the information containers within the information
model would have a status code of S6 or S7 depending on whether the information
exchange is happening before or at Plan of Work stage 6 (Handover) – see BS 8536-1
carried out: for further information about the Plan of Work stages.
At the start of a process of
information exchange with
the appointing party
Appointment

• Assign a status code of S6 or S7 as appropriate to the information containers within the information model
• Submit the information containers

NA.4.2 Status
Clause: 5.7.2 Review and authorize the information model

within the clause:
This clause is the second step in the process of delivering the information model as an
Lead appointed party information exchange to the appointing party and having it accepted as Published
information. The lead appointed party reviews the information model to check that it
Contributing parties to is suitable to be submitted to the appointing party.
the clause:
The information model is checked to make sure that it:
Task team(s)/appointed
parties • a
ddresses the exchange information requirements (both those set by the
appointing party and those introduced by the lead appointed party) including
acceptance criteria (for example, any formatting requirements documented in the
project’s information standard)
carried out: • contains all the appropriate deliverables from the master information delivery plan
During the process of • meets the acceptance criteria set out by the appointing party, and that it
the appointing party • meets the level of information need.
A successful review will mean that the information model is authorized by the lead
appointed party which triggers each task team to submit their information containers
Appointment to the appointing party (see clause 5.7.3).
An unsuccessful review will mean that the information model is rejected. In this case
the task team is instructed on amendment and re-submission of their information.
Partial acceptance of the information model should be avoided. This is to prevent
potential disputes arising within the delivery team or other delivery teams.
For example, if information model delivery is not complete, its output as reference
information for another delivery team will be unreliable.
An information exchange that is just within the delivery team (because the
information model is not being delivered to the appointing party) will be complete
after successful conclusion of this step and will not involve ISO 19650-2 clauses 5.7.3
and 5.7.4.
• Review the exchange information requirements (appointing party and lead appointed party)
• Check the information model
• If the review is successful then move to clause 5.7.3 as appropriate
• If the review is unsuccessful, reject the information model and instruct task teams accordingly
5.7.1 Submit information model for lead appointed party authorization
5.7.3 Submit information model for appointing party acceptance
Clause: 5.7.3 Submit information model for appointing party acceptance

within the clause:
This clause is the third step in the process of delivering the information model as an
Task team(s)/appointed information exchange to the appointing party and having it accepted as Published
parties information. The appointed party submits their information through the project’s
Contributing parties to common data environment.
the clause:
n/a

carried out:
During the process of
Appointment

n/a

Clause: 5.7.4 Review and accept the information model

within the clause:
This clause is the fourth and final step in the process of delivering the information
Appointing party model as an information exchange to the appointing party and having it accepted as
Published information.
the clause: The appointing party reviews the information submitted by an appointed party. In
doing this, the appointing party is concerned to check that the information has been
n/a
delivered according to the project’s information production methods and procedures
(such as, abiding by the security procedures).
When the activity within The appointing party should, where relevant, be checking the contents of the
the clause should be information container against:
carried out: • its exchange information requirements (EIR) including any acceptance criteria
During the process of specified in the EIR
• the dates recorded in the master information delivery plan (MIDP), and against
• the degree of information required defined through the level of information need.
If the review is successful the information model will be accepted by the appointing
Appointment
party and will transition to the Published state - the appointed party(ies) will publish
the information container(s) with an A status code – see ISO 19650-2 clause NA 4.2.
If the review is unsuccessful, the information model will be rejected and one, some or
all of the information containers will need to be revised. Although ISO 19650-2 says
that “... the appointing party shall … instruct the lead appointed party to amend the
information and resubmit for appointing party’s acceptance”, it is understood that
the amendment to any information container is actually carried out by the relevant
appointed party, under the direction of the lead appointed party.
Partial acceptance of the information model should be avoided. This is to prevent
potential disputes arising within the delivery team or other delivery teams.
For example, if information model delivery is not complete, its output as reference
information for another delivery team will be unreliable.
The published information will then be available as reference information for other
delivery teams. This may then trigger a new appointment process.

• R
eview the project’s information production methods and procedures, the EIR, the MIDP and level of information
need for each information requirement
• Review each information container in accordance with these resources
• If the review is successful, accept the information model
• If the review is unsuccessful, reject the information model and instruct the lead appointed party accordingly
5.2.1 Establish the appointing party’s exchange information requirements (where a new appointment is triggered)
5.8.2 Capture lessons learned for future projects (in reality this applies at an appointment level as well as at
project level)
ISO 19650-2 clause 5.8 Project close-out
Clause: 5.8.1 Archive the project information model

within the clause: Although individual information containers are added to the common data
Appointing party environment archive during information production, this particular requirement relates
to archiving the whole project information model as part of project close-out.
Contributing parties to This is to ensure that there is a definitive final version of the project information
the clause: model available in case it needs to be referred to by the appointing party after the
n/a project has been completed.

carried out:
At project close-out

Project

n/a

n/a
Clause: 5.8.2 Capture lessons learned for future projects

within the clause: The opportunity to capture, store and disseminate lessons learned from one project to
Appointed party the next (and from one appointment to the next), supports continuous improvement
of the briefing, delivery and operational outcomes of future projects. Although this
the clause: is noted as a project close-out activity, capture of lessons learned might also improve
processes within the duration of an appointment.
It is paramount that sufficient time and resources are allowed to identify, record and
When the activity within understand the implications of these lessons. A robust process will ensure information
collected is appropriately structured and in a consistent format to enable analysis,
carried out:
storage and onward utilization.
Throughout the project, but
particularly at close-out Capture of lessons learned is also an activity referenced in the BS 8536 series (which
remains within the UK BIM Framework), as part of soft landings. Soft landings
The level of the activity: provide a structured methodology whereby lessons can be captured.
Project and appointment The key objective of capturing lessons learned is to support future projects from
briefing through to the operational stages. Therefore, consideration should be made
to engage with stakeholders across the project life cycle to best inform the lessons and
in doing so future projects. Through a soft landings approach, the implementation of
suitably developed Post Project Evaluations (PPE) and Post Occupancy Evaluations
(POE) provide the platform upon which project lessons can be captured from a
variety of project stakeholders (Design Team, FM Teams, Contractor, user etc).
It is equally important that the obligations to actively participant within the lessons
learned process are clearly embedded within stakeholders appointments. The project
stakeholders should be engaged and encouraged to contribute to the lessons learned,
considering what was done well, what could have been done better and areas for
further consideration. Both quantitative and qualitative information may be collected
and suitable provisions for the analysis and dissemination of this information should
also be considered within the organization. Typical assessment criteria that may be
considered within a lessons learned exercise include:-
• Assess if the project/investment delivered the required outcomes.
• Assess any pre-determined performance metrics.
• Did the project delivery meet required budget and programme?
• Did the procurement process satisfy all parties?
• Did the information management process deliver its required outcomes?
• What is the asset users’ feedback?
• What are the final commercial costs for the project for benchmark purposes?
• Does the operational asset perform as designed?
• What were the social benefits/values delivered by the project?
• What was the carbon impact of the investment?
The list is not exhaustive but provides examples criteria to be considered.

Defining the criteria at the outset for the project will best support the delivery team
meet these project outcomes.

n/a
n/a
3.0 About the 2021 National Annex
The National Annex for ISO 19650-2:2018 has • Lack of agreement on which role codes
been revised and was released in February should be applied to certain originators.
2021 in BS EN ISO 19650-2:2018 & Revised For example, an interior designer (I) is also
NA. This guidance refers to the previous a subcontractor (X) by appointment but
National Annex as the “2018 National Annex” also a specialist designer (Y). So should
a façade contractor have their own code
and the new National Annex as the “2021
like an interior designer or would they be
National Annex”. The need to update the a subcontractor or specialist designer? This
2018 National Annex was based largely upon stemmed from the fact that disciplines
feedback received for how that National and roles were being confused and
Annex did not perform as efficiently as interchanged
expected.
• Uncertainty about what the A1, A2, A3 etc.
A few of the reasons, some of which stem status codes meant in terms of purpose.
back to experience of trying to implement BS
1192:20071, included: These, as well as other reasons, led to the
conclusion that the National Annex must be
• Using terminology (e.g. Volume) from the updated to resolve the confusion caused by
withdrawn 1192 series which was no longer the 2018 National Annex and BS 1192:2007.
defined anywhere
This guidance provides an insight into
• Providing a Field ID for information the changes and their impacts and gives
containers, but not making clear what examples of how the 2021 National Annex
types of information containers it should be
can be applied along with the considerations
applied to (as it did in BS1192:2007)
including those parts that have not changed.
• Lack of agreement (within the user
community) on which “Type” codes to assign
within the Field ID resulting in multiple
codes that could be applied to the same
information container type. This was
because some “Type” codes focussed on
the contents of the information container
whereas others focused on the presentation
or form of the information container
• Lack of agreement on which organisation

should be in the originator code (should
it be the author of the contents/Task
Team or should it be the lead designer/
main contractor directly appointed by the
client?)
1 BS 1192:2007 Collaborative production of architectural, engineering and construction information. Code of practice
3.1 Changes in the 2021 National Annex

3.1.1 Information Container ID Applicability
Change
The 2021 National Annex makes it clear that the Field codification described in the
National Annex only applies to files whereas the 2018 National Annex did not make
this distinction. The project’s information standard (developed and maintained by the
appointing party in agreement with lead appointed parties) should define which file
types the Field codification should be applied to.
Justification
The 2018 National Annex was not clear on which information containers this ID applied
to, for example: files, layers, directories, or objects. Clarity was requested as the Field
ID in the 2018 National Annex did not logically suit layers or objects. Information
containers that are layers should refer to BS EN ISO 13567-2 and this is clarified in the
2021 National Annex.
Potential benefits
Clarity on the use of the Field codification.
Potential negative impact
No negative impact is anticipated unless the 2018 National Annex was applied to
anything other than files.
3.1.2 Field/String Length
Change
The 2021 National Annex removes the 2018 National Annex recommended limit on the
field lengths. It does however contain a recommendation that these should be kept as
short as possible. The structure of the information container ID is now guided by the use
of the delimiter as defined by 2021 National Annex clause NA.2.3.
Requirements for field lengths should be defined in the project’s information standard.
Justification
Both BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National Annex were inconsistent in applying some field
limits but not others, meaning that standardization across industry was still not possible.
In addition, feedback reported that those restrictions made it difficult to apply to some
projects/types in some cases. What was established was that the field length was less
important providing the delimiter was used properly.
Potential benefits
Perceived restrictions imposed by BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National Annex that some
felt were detrimental to their projects have been withdrawn and appointing parties are
now free to identify the appropriate field lengths for their projects.
Previous field lengths that were based on the 2018 National Annex could be affected
by an appointing party`s decision to change them to suit their personal preference.
Without careful consideration of field lengths by the appointing party there could be
inconsistency across an organization and a project.
If solutions offered by software vendors are rigid and can only accommodate 2018
National Annex requirements then they will now need to accommodate flexibility guided
by the delimiter.
3.1.3 Project Identifier
Change
Recommended field length restrictions have been removed.
Justification
The restriction of 2-6 characters recommended by BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National
Annex did not lead to substantive standardization anyway. The restriction has been
removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Potential benefits
There is now more evident flexibility for the appointing party in determining the field
length. This change does not limit any previous approach.
There are no potential negative impacts providing the delimiter is used correctly.
3.1.4 Originator Identifier
Change
Change of field length – recommended field length restrictions have been removed.
Originator Code clarification - clarity has been provided on which organization

specifically the originating identifier should represent.
Justification
Change of field length - the restriction of 3-6 characters recommended by BS 1192:2007

and the 2018 National Annex did not lead to substantive standardization anyway. The
restriction has been removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Originator Code clarification – feedback indicated uncertainty about who the originator
code should be assigned to, with some considering it should be a task team and others
that it should be a lead appointed party. The 2021 National Annex makes it clear that
the originator code represents the organization of the information author identified in a
TIDP (see ISO 19650-2 clause 5.4.4).
Although the lead appointed party is “accountable” for ensuring the timely and complete
production of information as agreed in its MIDP, each appointed party is “responsible”
for generating the information assigned to it. This responsibility, and the agreed
deliverables defined in the TIDP must be contractually agreed as defined in clause
5.4.7 of ISO 19650-2. Note, a single organization can be responsible for managing
information (lead appointed party) and generating information (appointed party) –
refer to ISO 19650 guidance documents 2 and A for examples.
Potential benefits
Change of field length - there is now more evident flexibility for the appointing party in
determining the field length. This change does not limit any previous approach.
Originator Code clarification – there is now clear direction on who the originating code
should be assigned to. The appointing party can also generate an accurate record
of who the information originators were on their project. For example, rather than
recording a lead appointed party (such as a main contractor) as the originator of
all information containers in their control, the originator code will indicate the actual
organization who generated an information container (such as the steelwork fabricator).
Change of field length – there are no potential negative impacts providing the delimiter
is used correctly.
Originator Code clarification - those who have considered the “originator” to be a lead
appointed party or another organization that doesn’t naturally carry out clause 5.4.4 of
ISO 19650-2 may be impacted and may need to reconsider their approach in using this
field.
3.1.5 Functional Breakdown Identifier
Change
Change of field Length - recommended field length restrictions have been removed.
Change of field name – the field name has been changed from “Volume/System” to
“Functional Breakdown”.
Justification
Change of field Length - the restriction of 1 or 2 characters recommended by

BS 1192:2007+A2:2016 and the 2018 National Annex did not lead to substantive
standardization anyway. The restriction has been removed entirely in the 2021 National
Annex.
Change of field name – “Volume” was removed because it is not a term defined or used in
the ISO 19650 series.
“System” was not a suitable replacement because “system” has different meanings
depending on the source or use (for example, Uniclass 2015 has a different understanding
of system when compared with BuildingSMART IFC definitions or that defined in BS ISO
81346-122).
“Functions” can relate to systems or volumes (as explained in ISO 19650-1 clause 10.4) and
was agreed to be the most flexible term to adopt. Various breakdown structures could be
considered when developing the federation strategy as explained in ISO 19650-1.
Potential benefits
Change of field name – the new field can be used much more flexibly in comparison
to the superseded “volume/system” field. This means that if users wish they may still
adopt an embedded strategy even though the name has changed. For example, under
the superseded volume/system term users may have split volumes into various packets
of design based on function such as ventilation design, mixed services design or piling
design. This allowed the filtering of information containers based on aspects of the design.
This approach may still be applied to help those trying to find information to understand
the contents. Sometimes however, users may want to split the information containers by
something other than design function.
Those who were unfamiliar with, or did not understand, the term “Volume/system” in BS
1192:2007+A2:2016 and the 2018 National Annex will no longer be exposed to it.
Change of field length – there are no potential negative impacts providing the delimiter is
used correctly.
Change of field name – guidance, literature or training resources that still use “Volume/
system” terminology will require an update. Tools such as document management
platforms that have named column values for this field ID as “Volume/system” will also
need updating. If this cannot be done, this may be mitigated by inserting a clarification
about what this withdrawn term means.
2 S ISO 81346-12:2018 Industrial systems, installations and equipment and industrial products. Structuring principles and
B
reference designations. Construction works and building services
3.1.6 Spatial Breakdown Identifier
Change
Change of field name – the new name of “Spatial Breakdown” was introduced to align
to ISO 19650 terminology and to allow for wider scope in infrastructure.
Justification
Change of field Length - the restriction of 2 characters recommended by BS 1192:2007

and the 2018 National Annex did not lead to substantive standardization anyway. The
restriction has been removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Change of field name – the BS 1192:2007 and 2018 National Annex label for this
field “Levels/Location” covers two spatial descriptors so the rationale was to simply
call it “Spatial” to represent either. Furthermore, as ISO 19650 makes it clear a spatial
breakdown has to be considered, “Spatial Breakdown” was assigned as a replacement.
Potential benefits
Change of field length - there is now more evident flexibility for the appointing party
in determining the field length. This change does not limit any previous approach.
Change of field name – although the name has changed, a previous use and approach
to this field can be retained if preferred. Spatial breakdowns can go into significant
detail to complement a federation strategy but this degree of detail may not be
needed for the information container ID. What can be achieved with the broader
definition of “Spatial Breakdown”, is the ability to link information containers to more
than just locations and levels, such as sections, elevations, spatial zones or connections
such as risers, secure/unsecure locations, lift shaft, chainage etc.
An additional benefit could also be that multiple buildings, structures or services as

part of a single project could be assigned a “Spatial Breakdown” code.
Change of field length – there are no potential negative impacts providing the
delimiter is used correctly.
Change of field name – guidance, literature or training resources that still use “Levels/
locations” terminology will require an update. Tools such as document management
platforms that have named column values for this field ID as “Levels/locations” will also
need updating. If this cannot be done, this may be mitigated by inserting a clarification
about what this withdrawn term means.
3.1.7 Form Identifier
Change
Change of field`s purpose – rather than describe the type of document as in BS

1192:2007 and the 2018 National Annex, this field now describes the form that the
information is presented in.
Justification
Change of field Length - the restriction of 2 characters recommended by BS 1192:2007

and the 2018 National Annex did not lead to substantive standardization anyway.
The restriction has been removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Change of field`s purpose - the previous recommended values in BS 1192:2007 and

the 2018 National Annex were a mix of selectable codes, including “content” (such as a
survey), “form” (such as a drawing) and combination of “content” and “form” (for example
a schedule of accommodation told you that its form was a schedule and its content was
about accommodation). This led to confusion as more than one code could applied to
certain information containers. As another example, a 3D topographical survey could
have been recorded as a survey (SU) or a 3D model (M3).
In the 2021 National Annex this field only captures the form that the information has
been presented in (in reference to the form codes set out in BS ISO 29845:2011 3). Using
the previous example, the same 3D topographical survey would be recorded as a model
(M). Had the same information been recorded on a drawing (D) or as a list (L) of
coordinates, the form would have changed to reflect this.
This focuses on the form of presentation used rather than content and type, which may
be covered by the classification metadata.
Potential benefits
determining the field length. This change does not limit any previous approach. Note
that even though the standard codes are single characters, the field itself does not have
a length limit.
Change of field`s purpose - this field now allows a project team member to search by
how information has been presented rather than its content, which would be covered by
classification metadata. As the common data environment is intended to aid with the
location and discovery of information, the ability to filter by a smaller set of permitted
values will improve the likelihood of information being found. In addition, the omission
of overlapping descriptions (such as schedule and schedule of accommodation) allows
less ambiguity in the application of this field. This improves the ability to locate relevant
information. As the 2021 National Annex permits the expansion of recommended codes,
an organization’s existing list could be integrated with that included in the 2021 National
Annex, so long as it is recorded within the project’s information standard.
3 BS ISO 29845:2011 Technical product documentation – Document types

Change of field length – there are no potential negative impacts providing the delimiter
is used correctly.
Change of field`s purpose – this narrowing of codes from the 2018 National Annex to
focus on “Form” may take some getting used to.
In addition, some may find the selection of an appropriate form difficult for deliverables
that potentially use multiple forms of presentation. The 2018 National Annex (clause
NA.3.6 Note 2) recommends that for information containers with complex forms the
principal form is used to define the code. For example:
• A model including specification information has a model (M) Form code

• A drawing derived from a model has a drawing (D) Form code
• A drawing including tables or images has a drawing (D) Form code
• A report including photographs has a textual (T) Form code
• A report including tables has a textual (T) Form code
• A photograph of a drawing has an image (I) Form code.
Note: further examples of how the Form code can be assigned are set out BS ISO
29845.
3.1.8 Discipline Identifier
Change
Change of field Length – recommended field length restrictions have been removed.
Change of field`s purpose – the “Role” field in BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National
Annex has been changed to identify the “discipline” which an information container
relates to.
Justification
Change of field length - the restriction of 1 or 2 characters recommended by BS

1192:2007 and the 2018 National Annex did not lead to substantive standardization
anyway. The restriction has been removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Change of field`s purpose - The role codes in BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National
Annex had conflicts, mingling between contractual status (such as client, contractor
and sub-contractor) and job title such architect or building surveyor (the particular use
of architect in the list was inappropriate because of its protected status). This created
confusion resulting in examples of a subcontractor being identified by an “X” code
(subcontractor) on one project, on another being assigned “Y” code (specialist designer)
and another again the “M” code (mechanical engineer) when in fact their work is the
same on all three projects and technically all three code assignments are correct.
It was considered important to focus either on the roles (people/organizations) or on the

discipline (the tasks carried out). The agreement was to focus on Discipline only.
Note that the discipline code for producing information management resources could
be assigned a discipline code “X” (non-discipline specific or not applicable), “O” (other
discipline), or a two character project-specific code.
Potential benefits
Change of field`s purpose - The “Discipline” identifier allows improved flexibility for
identifying each information container’s discipline while retaining who produced
the information from the Originating Identifier. In the case of a multi-disciplinary
organization this enables each technical team to be identified separately (for example,
the architecture team (A code), the civil engineering team (C code) and the ground
engineering team (G code). Alternatively, there may be a one to one relationship
between originator and discipline for example, a building surveying organization might
be the only one producing building surveying content (B code).
Change of field Length – there are no potential negative impacts providing the delimiter
is used correctly.
Change of field`s purpose - certain approaches to using the old role field are not
possible with the 2021 National Annex. For example, appointing parties (clients) and
lead appointed parties (such as a main contractor) would have been assigned codes
that no longer apply.
In addition, it was common for main contractors to assign the BS 1192: 2007 and 2018
National Annex role code of subcontractor or specialist designer so they could separate
their consultants from their trade contractors. Now, where there is a broad discipline
code, such as E, electrical engineering, the “Functional Breakdown” code could be used to
identify the sub-divisions of this discipline, such as lighting, low voltage or high voltage
power or data cabling. It is recommended that this be reviewed and standardized clearly
in the project information standard and accompanying information production methods
and procedures.
3.1.9 Unique Number Identifier
Change
Recommended field length restrictions have been removed.
Justification
The restriction of 4 – 6 digits recommended by BS 1192:2007 and the 2018 National

Annex did not lead to substantive standardization anyway. The restriction has been
removed entirely in the 2021 National Annex.
Potential benefits
There is now more evident flexibility for the appointing party in determining the field
length. This change does not limit any previous approach.
There is potential for less cross-sector standardization on field length.

3.1.10 Status
Changes to Shared Status
Change
Removal of Shared status codes – status code S6 and S7 in BS 1992:2007+A2:2016 and

the 2018 National Annex have been removed.
Addition of a new Shared status code - status code S5 is a new code, specifically aligned
to ISO 19650-2 clause 5.7.3 – appointing party review and acceptance.
Change to Shared status codes – status codes S1, S2, and S3 are now aligned with ISO
19650-2 clause 5.6.5 (information model review) and S4 is aligned with ISO 19650-2
clause 5.7.1 (submit information model for lead appointed party authorization). S4 has
also had its purpose reworded.
Justification
Removal of Shared status codes S6 and S7 - by explicitly aligning the status codes with
ISO 19650-2 activities, user confusion about what to apply when, should be eradicated.
Addition of a new Shared status code S5 - it was recognized that some clients or specific
approval routes may need to have dedicated suitability codes for clauses 5.7.1 and 5.7.3.
New status code S5 was therefore introduced in the 2021 National Annex to distinguish
between the activities of sharing information containers for review and authorization
(S4) and sharing them for review and acceptance (S5).
Although ISO 19650-2 clauses 5.7.1 and 5.7.3 record these tasks as being performed
separately, there might be instances where they are combined into a single activity,
for example where a delivery team contains only one organization that is both lead
appointed party and appointed party.
Change to Shared status code S4 – the introduction of new Shared status code S5,
meant it was possible to refine the previously ambiguous definition of Shared status
code S4 “Stage Approval” by aligning S4 with clause 5.7.1 of ISO 119650-2.
Potential benefits
Removal of Shared status codes S6 and S7 - if these codes were unclear to users before,
then this removal is going to help with adoption of the 2021 National Annex.
Addition of a new Shared status code S5 - uncertainty about when to use Shared status
code S4 in regards to clause 5.7.1 and 5.7.3 of ISO 19650-2 is now removed as S4 is
complimented with S5. The different steps in the information review process can now be
clearly distinguished through these separate Shared status codes.
Change to Shared status code S4 – as noted above, uncertainty about when to use
Shared status code S4 is now removed.
Generally: any previous processes, guidance or training that referred to the Shared
status codes in BS 1192: 2007+A2:2016 or the 2018 National Annex will need revising to
reflect the 2021 National Annex.
Changes to Published Status
Change
Removal of Published status code – status code CR has been removed.
Clarification of Published status codes A1, An etc. – the 2021 National Annex now
provides distinction between authorization and acceptance (these are separate activities
within the ISO 19650-2 process). Note 2 has been added to clarify that Published
status codes do not imply particular reasons for issuing information and these should be
explained in the project’s information standard.
The B codes are now deprecated (which means that people are strongly advised not to
use them).
Justification
Removal of Published status code CR – this status code was duplicating one of the A
status codes.
Clarification of published status codes A1, An etc. - The A codes introduced in the
2018 National Annex were more nuanced than the A code of BS 1192:2007. This was
to reflect the increased complexity of the information management process. The
2021 National Annex provides a more general approach to support authorization or
acceptance of information containers at any point in the project life-cycle, not just at
handover from design to construction. Neither BS 1192:2007+A2:2016 nor the 2018
National Annex provided a suitable solution for this approach.
The 2021 National Annex clarifies that the purpose for issuing a Published information
container should be documented in the project’s information standard, alongside each
An status code, for example:
• A4 = Authorized and Accepted as suitable for construction (if using the RIBA 2020
stage outcome definition for stage 4 which defines a stage 4 completed deliverable
as construction ready)
• A5 = Authorized and accepted as suitable as a construction record (if using the RIBA
2020 stage outcome definition for stage 5).
Now, if a user wants to know if the drawing they have is for construction or not, they
would refer to the assigned status code and the project information standard defines.
Note that the default definition of project stages for the 2021 National Annex is as per
BS 8536 4 and although an alternative can be used (the RIBA plan of work, CIC, APM,
GRIP, PCF), the stage outputs must be defined in the project’s information standard
explaining exactly what each code represents in terms of what uses or purposes its
suitable for by the recipients.
4 BS 8536-1:2015 Briefing for design and construction - Part 1: Code of practice for facilities management (Buildings
infrastructure)
Potential benefits
Removal of Published status code CR – there is no longer any duplication with the A1-An
codes meaning an An code can be used to reflect final issue information containers.
Clarification of the Published status codes A1-An - uncertainty about when to use the
Published status codes is now removed providing that these are properly documented in
the project’s information standard.
Generally: any process, guidance or training that referred to the Published status codes
in BS 1192: 2007+A2:2016 or the 2018 National Annex will need revising to reflect the
2021 National Annex.
3.1.11 Classification
Change
The requirement for the CDE to enable each information container to be assigned
classification as metadata has not changed, nor has the requirement for information
containers to be classified in accordance with Uniclass 2015 as the UK implementation
of ISO 12006-2:2018. However, 2021 National Annex clause NA4.4 now provides
direction that the Uniclass 2015 PM table should be used where possible as the source for
classification metadata.
Justification
The combination of the information container unique ID with classification metadata

provides a consistent and systematic way of identifying information containers. This
helps both people and technology to locate information containers because their
identity becomes largely predictable. It also establishes a means of aligning information
containers in various information management resources. For example, where an
exchange information requirement (EIR) is for a fire safety strategy with classification
PM_40_20_30, the relevant task information delivery plan identifies that an information
container titled fire safety strategy with classification PM_40_20_30 is to be delivered.
Note, that if the functional breakdown field is identifying information content, care should
be taken not to duplicate between the functional breakdown code and the classification
metadata. In this instance, the classification code should complement or extend the
functional breakdown code.
The Uniclass 2015 PM table has been developed to classify information container content
and is therefore a suitable and manageable reference point.
Potential benefits
1. S
election of classification metadata is more straightforward because there is direction
to a specific Uniclass 2015 table rather than to the entire Uniclass 2015 system
2. The convention for information container classification becomes consistent across
multiple delivery teams and across multiple projects
3. Information container classification becomes predictable and logical. Reliance on
free text descriptions to identify information can be reduced
4. Information deliverables can be aligned across information planning resources and
with EIR. This provides a mechanism for automating the verification of information
deliverables.
The adoption of any classification system is not without its complications; a classification
system is never complete and is always in development. The contents of the PM table
may change throughout the life of an appointment or a project. It is therefore important
for the appointing party (client) to record the status and revision date of the version of
the PM table to be used in the project’s information standard and to take a considered
review before implementing any subsequently updated versions.
Where an information container includes mixed information (for example, a business case
containing cost models) a higher level of the PM table hierarchy could be used – in this
case PM_50_30 Economic viability information.
As it is an appointment resource, any changes to the project’s information standard would
need to be agreed with parties already appointed.
3.2 A
pplying the 2021 National The 2021 National Annex provides an
appointing party with a standardized
Annex approach for how the information container
unique ID and metadata assignments should
Guidance explaining how to apply the 2021 be approached. At this stage, the appointing
National Annex throughout the whole delivery party need only define in their project
phase will be released in the next edition information standard that the unique ID and
of ISO 19650 guidance 2. We would like to metadata conform to “BS EN ISO 19650-
invite you to propose situations or scenarios 2:2018 & Revised NA” and then specify any
that you would like us to address in the next project particulars including:
edition – please let us have these by emailing
[email protected] • T
he project code. This should be defined
noting that it must be used by all
3.2.1 A
pplication guidance for
assessment and need • A
ny known organizations. Each should
have an assigned originator code
This section of guidance relates to a client
• If Functional Breakdown has been
body as an appointing party. Information is
considered before any appointed parties
exchanged between the appointing party and
are engaged, then this should be explained
appointed parties either way, as file-based
and relevant codes assigned. If not, clarify
information containers.
“XX” should be used
At the very earliest stages of a project very
• If Spatial Breakdown has been considered
little will be known about the information that
before any appointed parties are engaged,
will be produced and exchanged throughout
then this should be explained and relevant
the project. But somethings need to be
codes assigned. If not, clarify “XX” should
considered, even before any appointments
be used
are made and design has taken place. The
appointing party should consider how they will • A
ny additions the appointing party
want information to be stored, exchanged and wishes to make to the Form and Discipline
retrieved, including in the strategic stage of a codes should be recorded. If not, then
project. Even at this stage, there will be some a note stating no changes apply or just
information to manage. These considerations referencing the annex will suffice
could then be defined as part of the
information standard and the information • The length of the Number field.
production methods and procedures as
defined by ISO 19650-2 clause 5.1.4 and
clause 5.1.5 (see ISO 19650 Guidance E). Any
requirements detailed in these resources (such
as the information container unique ID and
assigned metadata) must then be supported
through the implementation of the common
data environment workflows and technical
solutions (see ISO 19650-2 clause 5.1.7).
3.2.2 A
pplication guidance for the
remainder of the delivery phase
As noted above, we would like to invite you

to propose situations or scenarios relating to
the remainder of the delivery phase (covering
any or all parties) that you would like us to
address in the next edition – please let us
have these by emailing
[email protected]
4.0 Information management process

summary
The summary provides a helicopter view of the
processes according to ISO 19650-2 (although it
should be noted that it does not indicate every
possible instance of involvement across the
parties).
The following pages show the process in each
stage in more detail.
Key:
Activity to be undertaken
Decision point
Information exchange
Sequence flow
May contribute to or be informed of

91
Appointing party Lead appointed party Appointed party
New Project
Assessment and 5.1.1
Need (19650-2
clause 5.1) 5.1.2 5.1.3
(Establishing the 5.1.4 5.1.5 5.1.6

project’s information
framework) 5.1.7 5.1.8
New appointment
Invitation to Tender
(19650-2 clause 5.2) 5.2.1
(Creating information 5.2.2 5.2.3
for tender (for a
5.2.4 Invitation to
prospective lead tender
appointed party))
Tender Response
(19650-2 clause 5.3) 5.3.1
(Prospective lead 5.3.2
appointed party
tender submission 5.3.4 Selection 5.3.3
process) 5.3.5 5.3.6
5.3.7
Tender response
Selection
Appointment
(19650-2 clause 5.4) 5.4.1 5.4.1 5.4.1
(Finalization and 5.4.2
confirmation of 5.4.3
appointments)
5.4.5 5.4.4
5.4.6 5.4.7
Appointment executed Appointment executed
Mobilization
(19650-2 clause 5.5) 5.5.1 5.5.1
(Getting the delivery 5.5.2 5.5.2 5.5.2
team ready to go)
5.5.3 5.5.3
Collaborative
Production of 5.6.1
Information 5.6.2
(19650-2 clause 5.6) Information Information
model rejected model rejected 5.6.3
(Work in progress and Shared
shared information) information
5.6.5 5.6.4
5.6.5
Next Information iteration
Information
Information Model Information for
publishing Milestone
Delivery
5.7.2 5.7.1
(19650-2 clause 5.7)
Information for
(Checking of publishing
information for 5.7.4 5.7.3
publishing at an
information milestone) End of milestone
Project Close-Out
(19650-2 clause 5.8) 5.8.1 5.8.2 5.8.2
(End of project)
End of project
Assessment and Need (19650-2 clause 5.1)

(Establishing the project’s information framework)
Appointing party
New Project
5.1.1
Appoint individuals to
undertake the information
management function
5.1.2 5.1.3
Establish the project’s Establish the project’s
information requirements information delivering
milestones
5.1.4 5.1.5 5.1.6

Establish the project’s Establish the project’s Establish the project’s
information standard information production reference information and
methods and procedures shared resources
5.1.7 5.1.8
Establish the project’s Establish the project’s
common data environment information protocol
Invitation to Tender (19650-2 clause 5.2)

(Creating information for tender (for a prospective lead appointed party))
Appointing party
New appointment
5.2.1
Establish the appointing
party’s exchange
information requirements
5.2.2 5.2.3
Assemble reference Establish tender response
information and shared requirements and
resources evaluation criteria
5.2.4
Compile invitation to tender
information
Invitation
to tender
Tender Response (19650-2 clause 5.3)

(Prospective lead appointed party tender submission process)
5.3.1
Nominate individuals
to undertake
the information
management function
5.3.2
Establish the
delivery team’s (pre-
appointment) BIM
execution plan
5.3.4 5.3.3
Establish the delivery Assess each task
team’s capability and Selection
team capability and
capacity capacity
5.3.5 5.3.6
Establish the delivery Establish the
team’s mobilization delivery team’s risk
plan register
5.3.7
Compile the delivery
team’s tender response
Tender
response
Selection
Appointment (19650-2 clause 5.4)

(Finalization and confirmation of appointments)
5.4.1 5.4.1 5.4.1

Confirm the delivery Confirm the delivery team’s Confirm the delivery
team’s BIM execution plan BIM execution plan team’s BIM execution plan
5.4.2
Establish the delivery
team’s detailed
responsibility matrix
5.4.3
Establish the lead
appointed party’s
exchange information
requirements
5.4.5 5.4.4
Establish the master Establish the task
information delivery plan information delivery plans
5.4.6 5.4.7
Complete lead appointed Complete appointed
party’s appointment party’s appointment
documents documents
Appointment executed Appointment executed

Mobilization (19650-2 clause 5.5)

(Getting the delivery team ready to go)
5.5.1 5.5.1
Mobilize resources Mobilize resources
5.5.2 5.5.2 5.5.2

Mobilize information Mobilize information Mobilize information
technology technology technology
5.5.3 5.5.3
Test the project’s Test the project’s
information information
production methods production methods
and procedures and procedures
Collaborative Production of Information

(19650-2 clause 5.6)
(Work in progress and shared information)
Lead appointed party Appointed party
5.6.1
Check availability of
reference information and
Unsuccessful review
shared resources
5.6.2
Generate information
Unsuccessful check
5.6.3
Undertake
quality assurance
check
Shared
information 5.6.4
5.6.5
Information model Review information
review and approve for
sharing
5.6.5
Information model
review
Next Information iteration

Information Model Delivery

(19650-2 clause 5.7)
(Checking of information for publishing at an information milestone)
To 5.6.1 To 5.6.1 To 5.6.1

Information model rejected
Information
Milestone
Information model rejected
Information
5.7.2 for publishing 5.7.1
Review Submit information
and authorize the model for lead
information appointed party
model authorization
Information
5.7.4 for publishing 5.7.3
Review Submit information
and accept the model for appointing
information
party acceptance
model
End of milestone
Project Close-Out (19650-2 clause 5.8)

(End of project)
Appointing party Lead appointed party
5.8.1 5.8.2 5.8.2

Archive the Project Capture lessons learnt for Capture lessons learnt for
Information Model future projects future projects
End of
project
5.0 Summary
ISO 19650 guidance part 2 has provided an

explanation about the parties, teams and
activities involved in the processes for project
delivery.
It should be referred to by practitioners and

those implementing the ISO 19650 series
across a project, within an appointment or
within an organization.
The sixth edition also provided an introduction

to the 2021 National Annex. The next
edition will extend this guidance to cover
implementation of the 2021 National Annex
beyond the assessment and need activities
associated with the delivery phase of a
project.
Please do let us have your feedback by

emailing us at
[email protected].
Please also remember that standards within

the ISO 19650 series are available at
www.bsigroup.com.
Visit www.ukbimframework.org to see how the

ISO 19650 standards plus other standards
within the UK BIM Framework map to the
design, build, operate and integrate process.
Engage with the UK BIM Framework
[email protected] @UKBIMFramework
https://ukbimframework.org/ UKBIMFramework
The Centre for Digital Built Britain is part of the Construction Innovation Hub programme,
funded by UK Research and Innovation through the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund.

Guidance Part 2 - Parties Teams and Processes For The Delivery Phase of Assets - Edition 6 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidance Part 2 - Parties Teams and Processes For The Delivery Phase of Assets - Edition 6 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidance Part 2 - Parties Teams and Processes For The Delivery Phase of Assets - Edition 6 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Information management

according to BS EN ISO 19650

Edition 5 September 2020 Update includes:

© COPYRIGHT 2021 the Editors, Authors and Contributors named herein

Message from the

The key parts of ISO 19650 are now all in

About BS EN ISO 19650 and building

The ISO 19650 series replaces some of

Building information modelling (BIM) plays a

Structuring information using industry

Abbreviations and acronyms

Abbreviation or acronym Term

AIR Asset information requirements

BEP BIM execution plan

BIM Building information modelling

CDE Common data environment

EIR Exchange information requirements

MIDP Master information delivery plan

TIDP Task information delivery plan

About this guidance document

The guidance framework supports the UK

ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650 ISO 19650

Figure 1: ISO 19650 guidance framework

It is important that guidance part 2 is read

1.0 About ISO 19650 parties and teams

1.1 Understanding your role and the team context

The ISO 19650 series refers to the appointing

ISO 19650-2 Figure 2 shows the interface

Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams

Simplified version of ISO 19650-2 Figure 2

Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams

Sections 1.2, 1.3 and 1.4 of this guidance

It is therefore essential that you understand

The parties and relationships are as follows

The appointing party is the client or the party

A lead appointed party is a party appointed

An appointed party is a party appointed by

Figure 3: Simple party/appointment relationship

It is important to note that appointments for

The appointing party (the client) is likely

Lead appointed party

Appointed party Lead Lead appointed

Appointed Appointed Appointed Appointed

A project delivered according to a “traditional”

A project delivered according to a “design

Lead appointed party

Appointed party Lead Lead appointed Appointed

Lead appointed party

Appointed party Lead Lead appointed Appointed

Indicates the change in

1.2 Understanding activities and stages

Table 2: Activities and stages

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7

Procurement Planning Production

Per lead appointed party appointment

Activities can be categorized as: If you want to go directly to the activities

If you want to see the flow of activities

1.3 Appointing party

See ISO 19650 guidance C to understand the

Edition 5 September 2020 Update includes:

Figure 1: ISO 19650 guidance framework

1.1 Understanding your role and the team context

Figure 2: Interfaces between parties and teams

Figure 3: Simple party/appointment relationship

Indicates the change in

1.2 Understanding activities and stages

Table 3: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment

5.4.1 Confirm the delivery team’s BIM

1.4 Lead appointed party

Table 5: Information management components of the lead appointed party’s appointment

Table 6: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment

1.5 Appointed party/task team

Table 8: Information management components of the appointed party’s appointment

5.2 Invitation to tender 5.6.1 Check availability of reference

5.4 Appointment Medium 5.6.4 Review information and approve for

5.3.2 Establish the delivery team’s (pre-

2.0 ISO 19650-2 clause 5:

se of information during the operational phase: What standardized elements for

ecurity or distribution of information: How to implement specific security

elivery of information to the appointing party: How information is provided to the