5 Alternatives To Experimentation Correlational and Quasi Experimental Design PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 47

Alternatives to Experimentation:

Correlational and Quasi-


Experimental Designs

HENRY D. PALIVINO
Psychology Instructor
Objectives
• Learn more techniques that do not manipulate antecedent
conditions: correlations, other correlational-based
methods, and quasi-experimental designs.
• Learn how causal models can be constructed from
correlation-based designs
• Understand how the results of these nonexperimental
techniques may (and may not) be interpreted.
Correlational Designs
• low in manipulation of antecedent conditions
• high in imposition of units
Correlational Study
• degree of relationship between two traits, behaviors or
events
• finding the relationship between two variables but it does
not imply causation
• though advanced correlational method can propose cause
and effect relationship by developing causal models. such
as path analysis and cross-lagged panel designs.
• Pearson Product Moment of Correlation
• Pearson r
Simple Correlations
• Relationship between pairs of scores from each subject.
• Because of the way statistic is computed, value of
correlational coefficient ranges from -1 and +1
General Outcomes
• Positive/ Direct Relationship
• Negative/ Indirect Relationship
• No Correlation
Direction
-.08 Magnitude/
Strength
• Correlation is represented by scatterplot/scattergram
Positive/ Direct
Negative/Indirect
No Correlation
Variables which can affect correlation
1. Curvilinear
2. Range Truncation
3. Outliers
Reminders

Correlation does not


imply causation!!!
• Time Spent watching TV and Aggresive Behavior
• We cannot say that watching violent TV causes Aggresive
Behavior.
1
• Innate Aggressiveness might determine a preference for
violent TV, not the other way around.
2
• Innate aggressiveness results in more exposure to TV
violence but at the same time, the more exposure a
person has, the more aggressive he or she becomes
• This is know as Bidirectional causation
3
• Some third agent may actually be causing two behaviors
to appear to be related.
• This is known as third variable problem
Summary table for 4 Possible Causal
Directions for a Simple Correlation
1. X Y watching increases aggresiveness
2. Y X aggressiveness inreases watching
3. X Y both
4. Z
An unmeasurable third variable
X Y (Z) causes a child to watch more
violent TV and causes a child to
have higher levels of
aggresiveness
Coefficient of Determination
• denotes by r2
• Estimates the amount of variablity in scores on one
variable that can be explained by the other variable.
• an estimate of the strength of relationship between them.
• r=.51 r2= .26
• 26% of the change in Y is accounted in the change in X
• According to Cohen, r2 which is greater than or equal to
0.25 can be considered as strong association.
Linear Regression Analysis
• When two variables are strongly related, the researcher
can estimate a score on one of the measured behaviors
from a score on the other.
Multiple Correlation
• a measured behavior can be predicted by a number of
other measured behaviors rather than a single predictor
• Multiple Correlation does not explain why three measures
are related but it suggests the hypothesis that other
variable is an important 3rd variable that could be
explored in subsequent research
• It can be supported by partial correlation
Multiple Regression
• 2 or more related behaviors re being correlated
• use to predict the score on one behavior from scores on
the others.
Activity
• Practicum in using SPSS
• simple linear correlation
• Linear Regression
• Multiple Regression
Causal Modeling
Path Analysis
-a correlation based research method that can be used
when subjects are measured on several related behaviors.
-model of possible causal sequences.
-it generates important information for prediction and can
generate experimental hypothesis
.64 .65 .70
Empathy Self-reported Attitude Toward Helping the
Manipulation Empathy the Group Group
Cross-Lagged Panel Design
• it uses relationship measured over time to suggest the
causal path.
• subjects are measured at two separate points in time on
the same pair of related behavior or characteristics
Time Spent r=.14 Time Spent
watching TV watching TV
at age 3 at age 8

r=.20 r=.07 r=.05


r=.-.59

Size of Size of
Vocabulary vocabulary
at age 3 r=.41 at age 8
Summary of Correlation and Correlation Based
Methods
Correlation degree of relationship between 2 variables
Multiple degree of relationship between 3 or more variables
Correlation
Linear Regression use to predict scores on one variable from scores on a
Analysis correlated variable
Multiple Regression use to predict scores on one variable from scores on sets of
Analysis other variables.
Factor Analysis Determine subsets of correlated variables within a larger set of
variables
Cross Lagged Measures the same pair of variables at two different points in
Panel Design time, looks at patterns of correlation across time for possible
direction of cause and effect.
Quasi-Experimental
• quasi= latin word which means “seeming like”
• compared to experimentation, it lacks manipulation of
antecedent condition and random assignment of
participants.
• instead participants are selected for the different
conditions of the study on the basis of preexisting
characteristics.
• use to explore the effects of different treatments on
preexisting group of subjects or to investigate the same
kind of naturally occuring events, characteristics and
behaviors that we measure in correlational studies.
Kinds of Quasi-experimental Designs
• Ex Post Facto Studies
• Nonequivalent Designs
• Longitudinal Design
• Cross sectional studies
• Pretest/Post test Design
Ex Post Facto Studies
• use if your interested to study the effect of traits, behavior
or naturally occuring events that cannot or should not be
manipulated
• researcher systematically examines the effects of subject
characteristics but without actually manipulating them.
• researcher forms treatment groups by selecting subjects
on the basis of difference that already exist.
Nonequivalent Design
• one in which the researcher compares the effects of
different treatment conditions on preexisting group of
participants.
• random assignment is not possible
Longitudinal Design
• measuring behavior of the same subjects at different point
in time.
Cross-sectional studies
• just like longitudinal design but instead of tracking the
same group over a long period of time, subjects who are
already at different stages are compared at a single point
in time.
Pretest/ Post test
• measuring peoples behavior before and after the event
and compared these levels.
Summary of Quasi Experimental Research
Designs
Quasi Experiment Investigate differences in preexisting groups of subjects, groups
differences on some variable may be explored or different treatments
given to preexisting groups may be compared.
Ex post facto explore characteristics, behaviors or effects of naturally occurring events
in preexisting groups of subjects.
Non equivalent groups Compares the effect of different treatment conditions on preexisting
groups of subjects.
Longitudinal Investigates changes across time by measuring behavior of same group
of subjects at different points in time.
Cross Sectional Investigate changes across time by comparing groups of subjects
already at different stages at a single point in time.
Pretest-Posttest Explores the effects of an event (treatment) by comparing behavior
Design before and after the even (treatment)
ANY QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU! ☺

You might also like