Week 10 - Guingona Vs Gonzales
Week 10 - Guingona Vs Gonzales
Week 10 - Guingona Vs Gonzales
106971
Guigona Jr.,
petitioner vs.
NEPTALI A. GONZALES, ALBERTO ROMULO and WIGBERTO E. TAÑADA, respondents.
Facts:
The case is divided into two; the original petition and a motion for consideration. For context,
the facts of the original petition are included.
As a result of the national elections held on May 11, 1992, the Senate was composed of
the following members or Senators representing their political affiliations:
LDP 15 senators
NPC 5 senators
LAKAS-NUCD 3 senators
LP-PDP-LABAN 1 senator
Senator Romulo in his capacity as Majority Floor Leader nominated, for and in his behalf
of the LDP, eight senators for membership in the Commission on Appointments,
namely Senators Angara, Herrera, Alvarez, Aquino, Mercado, Ople, Sotto and Romulo.
The nomination of the eight senators was objected to by Petitioner, Senator Guingona,
as Minority Floor Leader, and Senator John Osmeña, in representation of the NPC.
Senator Teofisto Guingona. Jr. filed a petition for the issuance of a writ of prohibition to
prohibit Senate President Neptali Gonzales from recognizing the membership of
Senators Alberto Romulo as the eight senator elected by the LDP on the ground that it
is violative of the rule of proportional representation.
Issues:
Whether the election of Senators Alberto Romulo and Wigberto E. Tañada as members
of the Commission on Appointments is in accordance with the provision of Section 18
of Article VI of the 1987 Constitution.
Ruling:
YES
Under the law, Section 18 of Article VI of the 1987 Constitution states that, There shall be a
Commission on Appointments consisting of the President of the Senate, as ex officio Chairman,
twelve Senators and twelve Members of the House of Representatives, elected by each House on
the basis of proportional representation from the political parties and parties or organizations
registered under the party-list system represented therein.
In this case, The LDP majority in the Senate converted a fractional half membership into a whole
membership of one senator by adding one half or .5 to 7.5 to be able to elect Senator Romulo. In
so doing one other party's fractional membership was correspondingly reduced leaving the
latter's representation in the Commission on Appointments to less than their proportional
representation in the Senate. This is clearly a violation of Section 18 because it is no longer in
compliance with its mandate that membership in the Commission be based on the proportional
representation of the political parties. The election of Senator Romulo gave more representation
to the LDP and reduced the representation of one political party.