Political theory examines major thinkers and ideas central to political thought, focusing on normative questions about how political systems ought to be. The ancient Greeks began the tradition of Western political theory, analyzing their small city-state governments called poleis. In the poleis, democratic citizenship centered around direct participation in communal life and governance. However, increased contact with other societies led some Greeks like Antiphon to challenge traditional values and question whether laws truly reflected natural rightness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
297 views12 pages
PSP 202 - Introduction To Political Theory
Political theory examines major thinkers and ideas central to political thought, focusing on normative questions about how political systems ought to be. The ancient Greeks began the tradition of Western political theory, analyzing their small city-state governments called poleis. In the poleis, democratic citizenship centered around direct participation in communal life and governance. However, increased contact with other societies led some Greeks like Antiphon to challenge traditional values and question whether laws truly reflected natural rightness.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12
PSP 202 - INTRODUCTION TO - Ideas and doctrines set out
POLITICAL THEORY normative questions, as they are
concerned with what ought (or Lesson 1: What is Political Theory? should) more than what is. Political Science - Examples of normative questions: - Rooted in science ● Why should I obey the state? - Science is empirical, as its means ● What should be the limits of to acquire knowledge is through liberty? observation, experimentation and ● How should rewards be measurement. distributed? - Being empirical, political science - Political theory has various claims to describe, analyze and traditions, approaches and styles explain government and political but it is “united by theorizing, institutions in a rigorous and critiquing and diagnosing impartial manner. norms, practices and organization of political action Political Theory/Political Philosophy in the past and present, in our - Political philosophy a.) clarifies own places and elsewhere”. and refines concepts employed in political discourse; b.) provides Political Science vs Political Theory critical evaluation of political Political Science beliefs. ➢ Empirical - Political theory uses tools and ➢ Descriptive content of political philosophy. It ➢ What is/ How things are “involves the analytical study Political Theory of ideas and doctrines that ➢ Theoretical have been central to political ➢ Normative thought, focusing on major ➢ What ought to be/ How things thinkers or canon of classic ought to be texts”. Political Theory ● Valuational statements about - Examine philosophers’ analysis what ought to happen of political concepts and their ○ Statements about what justification of their views ought to happen - Contain newer resources 2 Roles: (traditions like feminism, - Contribute theories to the socialism, anarchism, etc.) abstract world of thought - No ultimate definition of the - Create beliefs that are influential discipline. Areas of enquiry are ● Beliefs are influential not because changing. they are true but because they - “Political theories… are secreted are believed. in the intestines of political and ● Political theories can hardly be social crisis.” said to be true. - Political theories are produced not by the crisis, but by the Relation with other disciplines: reaction of the crisis on those - Political Science (Political theory who have sensibility to be aware provides symbols and categories of the crisis. that organize lives and framework 2 Elements: of understanding) ● Intellectual Apparatus - matters - History (Historical context is taken from institutional realities needed to understand theories ● Institutional Realities - e.g. better.) religion, law, etc. - Philosophy (Philosophy starts 3 Factors: with wonder) ● Factual statements about affairs - Real-world politics (Political that gave rise to it theory engages with real-world ○ political/social crisis that development and may lead to were part of the setting real-world development - “ano ● Causal statements about nature daw???”) ○ Questions what/will happen ➢ Citizens or members of the city Lesson 2: The Greek Polis - count politically Introduction - History of Western political theory Greek Polis begins with the ancient Greeks, Democratic citizenship as center of as they became critical about life rules and institutions - Smallness of the polis allowed - They were also the first to citizens to participate in a have substantial written communal way of life records ● Active involvement of people in - “Criticism aids problem” public affairs - It is necessary to examine the ● Communal life is shared for conditions under which they lived mutual advantage - “Polis” is the root term of - The purpose of the law is to find “politics”, “politician”, “political”. the place or the station or “police” function of man in the total life of - Small self-contained the city (Sabine, 1937). institutional form which Democratic citizenship as center of provided intense communal life life - Equivalent to a city-state (small - Greek direct participatory territory dominated by a single democracy city) ● Direct participation on matters that affect the lives of everyone in Population/Social Classes the city ➢ Slaves - institutions in the ● All males above a certain age join Ancient World; serve as the Assembly and law courts possessions and do not count Democratic citizenship as center of politically life ➢ Resident foreigners or metics - - Political service as part of no way for legal naturalization; citizen’s life not count politically; free entity ● Brief terms of office, rapid principles (assuming religious turnovers, large numbers of form) which humans were able to citizens are directly involved discover, and these were ● Law, not the ruler, is sovereign. reflected in the laws of their Law deserves the citizen’s city respect. - Implication: Attitude towards ● Aristotle: Citizens are able to rule law is unquestioning and be ruled obedience. Democratic citizenship as center of life Challenge to Traditional Values - Political and social are - Increased contact between Greek overlapping. and other societies led to greater ● Aristotle: Man is a political animal. awareness of significant ● The political absorbed a far larger difference between laws and share of life lived in association customs with fellows. - Furthermore, thinkers began to ask why they should behave in Traditional Values accordance with - Nomos: Greek word for law, but laws/conventions also refers to customs. This ● Made distinction between what is indicates that Greeks had no right by nature and what is right distinction between laws and by laws/conventions customary values/beliefs. ● Some reflected on how ● Laws of Greek polis were laws/conventions do not reflect relatively stable because 1.) what is right by nature Societal conditions do not change Antiphon easily and 2.) There is a tradition - What is right by nature is what is of reverence for the law because to one’s advantage it is the law. - It is often not in one’s best - Citizens used to believe that interest/advantage to keep the there were true moral laws of one’s society - Conclusion: Obey human laws Lesson 3: Socrates only when there are witnesses. Introduction Do what nature dictates because ● Father of Western Philosophy it is what is advantageous to one, ○ part of intellectual regardless if it conforms to revolution conventions ● Most of what is known came from Thrasymachus writings or works of others - Crime often does pay. Immorality (specifically, Plato’s works) enhances a wrongdoer’s life and ● He roamed around city squares ruins the life of his victims and market places to talk to - Conclusion: Actively flout existing people from all states of life. laws/conventions ● Mission is not just to investigate Callicles claims of knowledge, but to show - Conventional moral standards are the errors in their thinking made by many in intentional ● Method: Socratic Method/ violation of what is right by nature Dialectics - Nature does not espouse ● Using his method, he tried to get equality. The stronger should people to attain clear and precise naturally rule the weaker and definitions of concepts. have a larger share. ● He used dialogue as a method - Conclusion: Being immoralist of learning. Instead of instructing people, he would ask a question Implication of these challenges to to start conversations. traditional values ● He would get people to remove - For Thucydides (historian), preconceptions and realize the casting aside traditional values is weakness of their own a major reason for the descent of arguments, so they would attain the Greeks into chaos, horror and clarity and recognize what is right slaughter. and wrong. This would allow people to give birth to correct insights. Process of Seeking Wisdom: ❖ Sophists - ethical relativism (no - person’s answer (person is quite ultimate right and wrong) certain of it) -> ask question to - Downside with both: People challenge the answer -> person thought conventional moral belief to realize contradictions or had no foundation and ultimately weakness of answer (be aware of fell into relativism because both one’s ignorance) -> attain clarity induce doubts about traditional hopefully and revise his answer values. -> give birth to correct insight Fundamental Moral Questions ★ He believed that the correct - What kind of person should insight leads to the correct one be? action. When one does wrong, it ● Look into the nature of human is due to the lack of knowledge excellence and wisdom (ignorance - lack of ● When a person knows what arete clear distinction between right is, he will attempt to achieve it. and wrong), rather than inherent ● Virtue is knowledge. Virtue can evils in humans. be learned and taught. ● Implication on electing official ★ Oracle of Delphi - wisest man in - Why should one care for the the world is Socrates soul? ● Traditional view vs Socrates’ view Socrates vs Sophists ● Traditional view: focus on - Both induced doubts about tangible attainments and worldly traditional values and doubts success; give importance to about the unquestioning justice because of its possible obedience to these traditional effects (worldly success – values happiness) ❖ Socrates - positive moral ● Socrates’ view: tangible teaching (not leave them in moral attainments and worldly success vacuum) are important but not as important as the soul; give importance to been disliked and regarded as a justice because it is essential to danger to the society. You have the welfare of the soul and a been indicted, tried and worthwhile life condemned to death in an unjust - Why should justice matter? manner. ● In Gorgias, Socrates argues that ● Your friends arranged an justice is a sufficient condition for opportunity for you to escape and happiness. It is better to suffer they will not be in danger for wrong than to commit it (Injustice doing so. Most people think it is harms the soul. With a tainted right for you to escape. soul, life is unbearable). ❖ Should you take the ● Difference between what people opportunity? think they want AND what they really want (ex. Wealth is Socrates’ Death desirable only if it leads to - Sentenced to death by drinking happiness; it leads to happiness hemlock for impiety and only if it is used well.) corrupting the youth - He was offered a chance to ★ ARETE - virtue and excellence escape but he refused. In Crito, he answered in his way: Socrates ● We ought not to harm anyone. By - “I am the wisest man alive, for I escaping, he would harm the know one thing, and that is that I state, violate and disregard its know nothing.” laws. - “True insight comes from within.” ● When one remains living in a - “The unexamined life is not worth state when one could leave, one living.” tacitly agrees to obey the law. If ● Suppose you are trying to be a he escapes, then he’s breaking good person, do your duty and the agreement. We ought not to advocate the good of your break a promise. fellowmen. However, you have ● One’s society or state is one’s ● Valuational statement: Reform parent/teacher. We ought to obey must come from outside the our parent/teacher. existing political process ❖ (Plato got involved in political PLATO (PART 1: DEFENSE OF affairs through his teachings -> JUSTICE) created lawyers and advisers to Background rulers) ● Context: Traditional values were under attack by imm oralists and The Republic skeptics ● Greek title: Politeia (constitution ● Plato’s aim: Develop a or way of life of a city) counter-attack and defend justice ● Alternate title: On Justice ● Thought that the Athenian ● Content: Glaucon and constitution was beyond Adeimantus praised injustice redemption, except through which Socrates tried to rebut miracles since he saw how it ● Concerns: failed Socrates. A centerpiece for ○ What is justice? The Republic was that “existing ○ How does justice pay? cities are hopelessly corrupt and ○ How can people be made must remain so unless they can just? be rescued from their plight by ● Glaucon requested to examine philosophic rulers.” the benefits of justice more deeply. Plato's Political Theory ○ Goods - those that benefit ● Factual statement: Poor city, the possessor-leading to corrupt political institutions happiness ● Causal statement: Existing ○ 2 ways to benefit: political institutions cannot immediate and remote remedy the situation ○ 3 classifications: ■ Immediately beneficial without remote for justice matters, not consequence justice itself.) ■ Immediately ● Plato’s common-sensical beneficial with argument to defend justice: remote benefits Justice pays (Just man benefits. ■ Immediately harmful Justice is better than injustice. with remote benefits Justice is necessary to attain a ● Socrates’ concept of justice vs happy life.) Glaucon’s concept of justice ○ For Socrates, justice is Analogy Between Soul and City immediately beneficial with ● Justice in the human soul is remote benefits small, so it is harder to observe. ○ For Glaucon, justice is ● Make the analogy between soul immediately harmful with and city. remote benefits. Justice is ● Individuals (soul) are to be avoided if possible, decisively-shaped by the society but necessary to get he is in. A city is as it is because rewards. One should be of the kind of people in it. unjust as long as he is not ● Discussion of justice in the city caught. helps to understand the nature of ● Glaucon praises the unjust life. justice in the soul. ○ By nature, there is desire ● Moral reform (justice in the soul): for undue gain, but this This can be achieved not through desire is restrained by Socratic dialogue, but only by others. being raised in a just city. ○ No one is just willingly (ex. ● Just city is where just souls can Gyges’ ring) be formed. ○ Injustice is better than justice. (Unjust man Just City flourishes more than the ● Just city is where just souls can just man. Only reputation be formed ● Just city is characterized with accept their place in the rigid differentiation of function and society division of labor among 3 classes ○ Justice - require each (known as principle of person to stay in his own specialization) place in the society and do ○ Rulers – philosopher kings his own job for which he is ○ Auxiliaries – fighting force naturally-suited. Decisions ○ Productive class – will be made by those responsible for economic competent to make them. life of city ● Justice is what allows other ● Division is necessary for virtues to exist. Only if each efficiency and so that people take person accepts his place and on roles for which they are not constantly working against naturally-suited. social order can there be ● Emphasized education and smooth functioning of the training of rulers and auxilliaries society. (both called Guardians) ● If education system is successful, Just Souls it will be a smoothly functioning ● Just city is where just souls can city that possesses the virtues be formed ● 4 traditional virtues: wisdom, ● Moral reform demands political courage, temperance, justice power. A properly-governed just ○ Wisdom - wise rulers who city can harmonize the soul of the make intelligent decisions inhabitants. make a wise city ○ Being subjected to the rule ○ Courage - courageous of a wise ruler is for fighting force makes a everyone’s advantage. courageous city ○ If the person is not yet just, ○ Temperance - concerns he can be reformed by relations between classes; being in the just city (with the classes are willing to its laws). ● For Plato, politics must benefit Justice Pays people by imposing order on their ● Compared just city with other souls. Must properly condition the unjust city: soul while still young, since the ○ Timarchy - Just city turns environment shapes people. to timarchy when ● Soul has 3 parts: auxiliaries elevate ○ Rational part (rulers) - themselves to rulers calculates what is good for (enslave lower classes) the soul ○ Oligarchy - Auxiliaries ○ Spirited part (auxiliaries) - amass wealth and rule to ability to feel, form preserve it, leading to self-image that moves a economic inequality (poor person becomes poorer; rich ○ Appetitive part becomes richer). (productive class) - can ○ Democracy - Poor see only their pressing conquer rich. Poor kills needs, demand some rich and expels the satisfaction regardless of others. The rest have other considerations equal share of political office. Mob is intolerant Just soul (shows that justice pays) and may lead to political ● Justice in the soul: A just man is instability. a master of himself, allows other ○ Tyranny - Tyrant first virtues to exist. It pays to have a arises as champion of the balanced, moderate life (leads to people. He appears nice at happiness). first to cement the favor of ● The unjust man is a slave to the people, then his true appetite. He has constant character emerges. (Starts desires that are unfulfilled (leads a war to tax the people into to unhappiness). poverty; poverty will make people focus on daily needs instead of politics; tyrant launches war to purge/suppress enemies) ■ EX: Marcos started as a good ruler but after re-election (acquiring loyalty/favor of majority) he became a tyrant as he abused his power and declared Martial Law. ● In the unjust city, the ruling class is happy at the expense of the city. ● Just city as a whole is happier because ruling class rules in the interests of all classes and all classes will be satisfied (leading to political stability) ★ Just Souls in the Just City = City functioning as a whole