NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook
NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook
NCEES PE Civil Reference Handbook
Reference Handbook
Version 1.2
This document is protected under U.S. and international copyright law. You may
print this document for your personal use, but you may not distribute it
electronically or in print or post it on the internet without the express written
permission of NCEES. Contact [email protected] for more information.
Copyright ©2021 by NCEES®. All rights reserved.
All NCEES material is copyrighted under the laws of the United States. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of NCEES.
Requests for permissions should be addressed in writing to [email protected].
Version 1.2
ii
INTRODUCTION
About the Handbook
The Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE) Civil exam is computer-based, and NCEES will supply all the resource
material that you are allowed to use during the exam. Reviewing the PE Civil Reference Handbook before exam day will
help you become familiar with the charts, formulas, tables, and other reference information provided. You will not be
allowed to bring your personal copy of the PE Civil Reference Handbook into the exam room. Instead, the computer-based
exam will include a PDF version of the handbook for your use. No printed copies of the handbook will be allowed in the
exam room.
The PDF version of the PE Civil Reference Handbook that you use on exam day will be very similar to this one. However,
pages not needed to solve exam questions—such as the cover and introductory material—may not be included in the exam
version. In addition, NCEES will periodically revise and update the handbook, and each PE Civil exam will be administered
using the updated version.
The PE Civil Reference Handbook does not contain all the information required to answer every question on the exam.
Theories, conversions, formulas, and definitions that examinees are expected to know have not been included. The
handbook is intended solely for use on the NCEES PE Civil exam.
To familiarize yourself with the format, style, and navigation of a computer-based exam, visit the Exam Resources section
on the NCEES YouTube channel.
Errata
To report errata in this book, send your correction through your MyNCEES account. Examinees are not penalized for any
errors in the Handbook that affect an exam question.
iii
CONTENTS
1 GENERAL ENGINEERING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Distinguishing Pound-Force from Pound-Mass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.2 Fundamental Constants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 Conversion Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Mathematics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.1 Straight Line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.2 Quadratic Equation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.3 Quadric Surface (SPHERE). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.4 Difference Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.5 Logarithms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3.6 Trigonometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3.7 Mensuration of Areas and Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.8 Conic Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4 Engineering Probability and Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.4.1 Dispersion, Mean, Median, and Mode Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.4.2 Statistical Quality Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1.5 Statics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.1 Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.2 Resultant (Two Dimensions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.3 Resolution of a Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.4 Moments (Couples) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.5 Systems of Forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.5.6 Centroids of Masses, Areas, Lengths, and Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.5.7 Moment of Inertia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.5.8 Friction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.5.9 Screw Thread . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.5.10 Belt Friction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.5.11 Statically Determinate Truss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.5.12 Concurrent Forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1.6 Mechanics of Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.6.1 Uniaxial Stress-Strain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.6.2 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1.6.3 Thermal Deformations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
iv
1.6.4 Stress and Strain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
1.6.5 Torsion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1.6.6 Torsional Strain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1.6.7 Beams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1.6.8 Columns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
1.7 Engineering Economics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.7.1 Nomenclature and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.7.2 Nonannual Compounding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.7.3 Breakeven Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.7.4 Inflation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.7.5 Depreciation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
1.7.6 Book Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
1.7.7 Capitalized Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
1.7.8 Rate-of-Return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
1.7.9 Benefit-Cost Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
1.7.10 Interest Rate Tables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2 CONSTRUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.1 Earthwork Construction and Layout. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.1.1 Excavation and Embankment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
2.1.2 Earthwork Volumes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
2.1.3 Site Layout and Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.1.4 Earthwork Balancing and Haul Distances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
2.1.5 Site and Subsurface Investigations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
2.2 Estimating Quantities and Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.2.1 Quantity Takeoff Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.2.2 Cost Estimating. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.2.3 Cost Indexes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
2.3 Construction Operations and Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.3.1 Crane Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
2.3.2 Dewatering and Pumping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
2.3.3 Equipment Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
2.3.4 Pile Dynamics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
2.4 Scheduling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
2.4.1 Critical Path Method (CPM) Network Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
2.4.2 Resource Scheduling and Leveling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
v
2.4.3 Time-Cost Trade-Off . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
2.5 Material Quality Control and Production. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
2.5.1 Material Properties and Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
2.5.2 Concrete Proportioning and Placement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
2.5.3 Concrete Maturity and Early Strength Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
2.5.4 Soil Stabilization Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
2.6 Health and Safety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
2.6.1 Safety Management and Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
2.6.2 Work Zone and Public Safety. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3 GEOTECHNICAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.1 Lateral Earth Pressures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.1.1 At-Rest Coefficients. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3.1.2 Rankine Earth Coefficients. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
3.1.3 Coulomb Earth Pressures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
3.1.4 Load Distribution from Surcharge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
3.1.5 Pseudostatic Analysis and Earthquake Loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.2 Consolidation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
3.2.1 Normally Consolidated Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.2.2 Overconsolidated Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.2.3 Time Rate of Settlement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
3.2.4 Settlement Ratio for Overconsolidation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.3 Effective and Total Stresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.3.1 Shear Strength—Total Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.3.2 Shear Strength Effective Stress. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.3.3 Undrained Shear Strength of Clays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.3.4 Drained Shear Strength of Clays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.4 Bearing Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
3.4.1 Bearing Capacity Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
3.4.2 Bearing Capacity Equation for Concentrically Loaded Strip Footings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
3.4.3 Frost Depth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
3.5 Foundation Settlement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
3.5.1 Stress Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
3.5.2 Settlement (Elastic Method). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
3.5.3 Settlement (Schmertmann's Method). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
vi
3.6 Slope Stability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.6.1 Stability Charts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
3.6.2 Translational Failure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
3.6.3 Rock Slope Failure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
3.6.4 Infinite Slope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
3.6.5 Ordinary Method of Slices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
3.6.6 Slope Stability Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
3.7 Soil Classification and Boring Log Interpretation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
3.7.1 Subsurface Exploration and Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
3.7.2 Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
3.7.3 AASHTO Classification System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
3.7.4 Rock Classification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
3.8 Material Test Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
3.8.1 In Situ Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
3.8.2 Atterberg Limits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
3.8.3 Weight-Volume Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
3.8.4 Gradation Tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
3.8.5 Permeability Testing Properties of Soil and Rock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
3.9 Compaction: Laboratory and Field Compaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
3.9.1 Laboratory Compaction Tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
3.9.2 Field Compaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
3.9.3 Compaction Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
3.10 Trench and Excavation Construction Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
3.10.1 Determination of Soil Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
3.10.2 Slope and Shield Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
3.10.3 Slope Configurations: Excavations in Layered Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
3.10.4 Excavations Made in Type A Soil. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
3.10.5 Excavations Made in Type B Soil. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
3.11 Geotechnical Instrumentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
3.12 Ground Improvement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
3.12.1 Types of Ground Improvement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
3.12.2 Grouting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
3.12.3 Vibrocompaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
3.12.4 Dynamic Compaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
vii
3.13 Geosynthetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
3.13.1 Types of Geosynthetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
3.13.2 Filter Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
3.13.3 Strength Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
3.13.4 Flow Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
3.13.5 Reinforced Walls and Slopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
3.13.6 Geofoam. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
3.14 Earth Dams, Levees, and Embankments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
3.15 Landfills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
3.16 Groundwater and Seepage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
3.16.1 Darcy's Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
3.16.2 Permeability of Various Sands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
3.16.3 Flow Through Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
3.16.4 Flow Nets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
3.16.5 Flow Through Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
3.17 Problematic Soil and Rock Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
3.17.1 Reactive and Corrosive Soils. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
3.17.2 Corrosion of Buried Steel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
3.17.3 Frost Susceptibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
3.18 Earth Retention—Anchored Walls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
3.18.1 Ground Anchor Components and Types. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
3.18.2 Potential Modes of Failure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
3.18.3 Anchor Loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
3.18.4 Anchor Capacity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
3.18.5 Corrosion Protection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
3.18.6 Load Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
3.18.7 Settlement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
3.19 Pavements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
4 STRUCTURAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.1 Structural Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.1.1 Influence Lines for Beams and Trusses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.1.2 Moving Concentrated Load Sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.1.3 Beam Stiffness and Moment Carryover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
4.1.4 Truss Deflection by Unit Load Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
viii
4.1.5 Frame Deflection by Unit Load Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
4.1.6 Member Fixed-End Moments (Magnitudes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
4.1.7 Moment, Shear, and Deflection Diagrams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
4.2 Steel Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
4.2.1 Fastener Groups in Shear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262
4.2.2 Steel Sheet Pile Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
4.2.3 Basic Welding Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264
4.3 Concrete Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
4.3.1 Reinforcement Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265
4.3.2 Design Provisions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
5 TRANSPORTATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
5.1 Traffic Engineering (Capacity Analysis and Transportation Planning). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
5.1.1 Uninterrupted Flow (e.g., Level of Service, Capacity). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
5.1.2 Street Segment Interrupted Flow (e.g., Level of Service, Running Time, Travel Speed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
5.1.3 Traffic Analysis (e.g., Volume Studies, Peak Hour Factor, Speed Studies, Modal Split). . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
5.1.4 Accident Analysis (e.g., Conflict Analysis, Accident Rates, Collision Diagrams). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276
5.1.5 Traffic Forecast. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277
5.1.6 Design Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278
5.2 Horizontal Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
5.2.1 Basic Curve Elements (e.g., Middle Ordinate, Length, Chord, Radius) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 279
5.2.2 Layout of Two-Centered Compound Curves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
5.2.3 Layout of Three-Centered Compound Curves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
5.2.4 Layout of Reverse Horizontal Curves Between Parallel Tangents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
5.2.5 Method of Designating Directions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
5.3 Vertical Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286
5.3.1 Symmetrical Vertical Curve Formula. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286
5.4 Signal Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
5.4.1 Dilemma Zones. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287
5.4.2 Offsets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288
5.4.3 Interval Timing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289
5.5 Geotechnical and Pavement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
5.5.1 Relative Soil Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
5.5.2 Plasticity Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
5.5.3 Shrinkage of Soil Mass. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
5.5.4 Soil Compaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
ix
5.5.5 Asphalt Mixture Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
5.5.6 Structural Design of Flexible Pavement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293
5.5.7 Predicting Truck Traffic Volumes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
5.5.8 Monthly Adjustment Factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
6 WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
6.1 Fluid Mechanics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
6.1.1 Constants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
6.1.2 Density, Specific Volume, Specific Weight, and Specific Gravity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
6.1.3 Stress, Pressure, and Viscosity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
6.1.4 Characteristics of a Static Liquid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
6.1.5 Chemistry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
6.1.6 Population Projection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
6.2 Hydraulics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
6.2.1 Principles of One-Dimensional Fluid Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
6.2.2 Fluid Flow Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
6.2.3 Consequences of Fluid Flow (Circular Conduits) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
6.2.4 Flow in Conduits (Circular or Noncircular). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
6.2.5 Hydraulic Flow Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
6.2.6 Orifices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
6.2.7 Spillways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 332
6.3 Closed Conduit Flow and Pumps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
6.3.1 Hazen-Williams Equation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
6.3.2 Darcy-Weisbach Equation (Head Loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
6.3.3 Minor Losses in Pipe Fittings, Contractions, and Expansions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
6.3.4 Pipe Bends, Enlargements, and Contractions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
6.3.5 Fire Hydrant Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
6.3.6 Flow Through a Packed Bed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
6.3.7 Water Hammer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
6.3.8 Pump Application and Analysis, Including Wet Wells, Lift Stations, and Cavitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
6.3.9 Lift Station Pumping and Wet Wells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
6.3.10 Pipe Network Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
6.4 Open-Channel Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
6.4.1 Conservation of Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
6.4.2 Specific Energy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
6.4.3 Normal and Critical Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
x
6.4.4 Momentum Depth Relationship. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
6.4.5 Steady Uniform Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
6.4.6 Hydraulic Classification of Slopes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
6.4.7 Gradually Varied Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
6.4.8 Rapidly Varied Flow and Hydraulic Jump. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
6.4.9 Composite Slopes Channel Profiles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
6.4.10 Stormwater Collection and Drainage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
6.5 Hydrology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
6.5.1 Storm/Flood Frequency Probabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
6.5.2 Runoff Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385
6.5.3 Rainfall Intensity, Duration, and Frequency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399
6.5.4 Time of Concentration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399
6.5.5 Hydrograph Development and Applications, Including Synthetic Hydrographs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400
6.5.6 Rainfall Gauging Stations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407
6.5.7 Stream Gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410
6.5.8 Depletions (e.g., Evaporation, Detention, Percolation, and Diversions). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
6.5.9 Stormwater Management (e.g., Detention Ponds, Retention Ponds, Infiltration Systems, and Swales). . 416
6.6 Groundwater and Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
6.6.1 Groundwater System and Hydrologic Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
6.6.2 Aquifers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
6.6.3 Groundwater Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 425
6.6.4 Well Analysis–Steady State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429
6.7 Water Quality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
6.7.1 Mass Conservation and Continuity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
6.7.2 Advection-Dispersion Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430
6.7.3 Biochemical Oxygen Demand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432
6.7.4 Oxygen Dynamics (Microbial Kinetics). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433
6.7.5 Monod Kinetics–Substrate Limited Growth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440
6.7.6 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442
6.7.7 Biological Contaminants (Partition Coefficients). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 443
6.7.8 Risk Calculation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 444
6.8 Wastewater Collection and Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
6.8.1 Wastewater Collection Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 448
6.8.2 Wastewater Flow Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
6.8.3 Wastewater Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
xi
6.8.4 Preliminary Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451
6.8.5 Primary Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452
6.8.6 Nitrification/Denitrification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
6.8.7 Phosphorus Removal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 464
6.8.8 Solids Treatment, Handling, and Disposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465
6.8.9 Digestion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
6.8.10 Disinfection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469
6.8.11 Advanced Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469
6.9 Drinking Water Distribution and Treatment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
6.9.1 Drinking Water Distribution Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470
6.9.2 Drinking Water Treatment Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471
6.9.3 Activated Carbon Adsorption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474
6.9.4 Air Stripping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
6.9.5 Hardness and Softening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
6.9.6 Settling and Sedimentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 480
6.9.7 Taste and Odor Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486
6.9.8 Membrane Filtration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488
6.9.9 Ultrafiltration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
6.9.10 Disinfection, Including Disinfection Byproducts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
6.9.11 Removal and Inactivation Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493
6.9.12 Typical Removal Credits and Inactivation Requirements for Various Treatment Technologies . . . . . . . . 493
xii
1 GENERAL ENGINEERING
1.1 Units
1.1.1 Distinguishing Pound-Force from Pound-Mass
This handbook uses the International Systems of Units (SI) (metric) and the U.S. Customary System (USCS). In USCS
units, both force and mass are called pounds. Therefore, one must distinguish the pound-force (lbf) from the pound-mass
(lbm). If the exam question is presented in USCS units, it may be necessary to use the constant gc in the equation to have a
consistent set of units.
lbm-ft
1 lbf = 32.174
sec 2
ma
F= g
c
where
F is in lbf
m is in lbm
ft
a is in
sec 2
lbm-ft
gc = 32.174
lbf - sec 2
mv 2
Kinetic Energy: KE = 2g with KE in ft-lbf
c
mgh
Potential Energy: PE = gc with PE in ft-lbf
ρgh lbf
Fluid Pressure: p = gc with p in 2
ft
ρg lbf
Specific Weight: SW = gc with SW in 3
ft
Shear Stress: x = e g od dy n with x in 2
n dv lbf
c ft
©2021 NCEES 1
Chapter 1: General Engineering
METRIC PREFIXES
COMMONLY USED EQUIVALENTS
Multiple Prefix Symbol
10–18 atto a
10–15 femto f 1 gallon of water weighs 8.34 lbf
10–12 pico p 1 cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 lbf
10–9 nano n 1 cubic inch of mercury weighs 0.491 lbf
10–6 micro µ The mass of 1 cubic meter of water is 1,000 kilograms
10–3 milli m
1 mg/L is 8.34 × 10–6 lbf/gal
10–2 centi c
10–1 deci d
101 deka da TEMPERATURE CONVERSIONS
102 hecto h
103 kilo k
106 mega ºF = 1.8 (ºC) + 32
M
109 giga G ºC = (ºF – 32)/1.8
1012 tera T ºR = ºF + 459.69
1015 peta P K = ºC + 273.15
1018 exa E
©2021 NCEES 2
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.3 Mathematics
1.3.1 Straight Line
The general form of the equation is
Ax + By + C = 0
y = mx + b
y – y1 = m(x – x1)
©2021 NCEES 4
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.3.5 Logarithms
The logarithm of x to the Base b is defined by
logb (x) = c
where bc = x
ln x, Base = e
log x, Base = 10
Identities
logb bn = n
logb b = 1
log 1 = 0
1.3.6 Trigonometry
Trigonometric functions are defined using a right triangle.
©2021 NCEES 5
Chapter 1: General Engineering
β
α
A B
c
1.3.6.4 Identities
cos θ = sin (θ + π/2) = -sin (θ - π/2)
sin θ = cos (θ - π/2) = -cos (θ + π/2)
csc θ = 1/sin θ
sec θ = 1/cos θ
tan θ = sin θ/cos θ
cot θ = 1/tan θ
sin2 θ + cos2 θ = 1
tan2 θ + 1 = sec2 θ
cot2 θ + 1 = csc2 θ
sin (α + β) = sin α cos β + cos α sin β
cos (α + β) = cos α cos β – sin α sin β
sin 2α = 2 sin α cos α
cos 2α = cos2 α – sin2 α = 1 – 2 sin2 α = 2 cos2 α – 1
tan 2α = (2 tan α)/(1 – tan2 α)
cot 2α = (cot2 α – 1)/(2 cot α)
tan (α + β) = (tan α + tan β)/(1 – tan α tan β)
cot (α + β) = (cot α cot β – 1)/(cot α + cot β)
sin (α – β) = sin α cos β – cos α sin β
cos (α – β) = cos α cos β + sin α sin β
tan (α – β) = (tan α – tan β)/(1 + tan α tan β)
cot (α – β) = (cot α cot β + 1)/(cot β – cot α)
sin (α/2) =
cos (α/2) =
tan (α/2) =
cot (α/2) =
sin α sin β = (1/2)[cos (α – β) – cos (α + β)]
cos α cos β = (1/2)[cos (α – β) + cos (α + β)]
©2021 NCEES 6
Chapter 1: General Engineering
P = perimeter
V = volume
1.3.7.2 Parabola b
A = 2bh/3 b
h
h
A = bh/3 b
b
h
h
x'
(h, k)
©2021 NCEES 7
Chapter 1: General Engineering
where
λ = _a − b i /_a + b i
Source: Gieck, K. and R. Gieck. Engineering Formulas. Gieck Publishing, 1967.
1.3.7.4 Circle
C = circumference = 2πr = πd
r
IS IN RADIANS
A = θr 2 /2 = sr/2 s
θ = s/r
r
IS IN RADIANS
©2021 NCEES 8
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.3.7.7 Sphere
V = 4rr3/3 = rd 3/6
A = 4rr2 = rd 2
1.3.7.8 Parallelogram
b d1 d2
h
a
If a = b, the parallelogram is a rhombus.
Source: Gieck, K. and R. Gieck. Engineering Formulas. Gieck Publishing, 1967.
s = 2r 8tan ^z/2hB s
A = ^ nsr h /2
©2021 NCEES 9
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.3.7.10 Prismoid
V = ^ h/6h ^ A1 + A2 + 4Ah
A2
h
h/2
A
A1
r Ab
Source: Gieck, K. and R. Gieck. Engineering Formulas. Gieck Publishing, 1967.
V = rr 2 h = r d h
2
4 r
A = side area + end areas = 2rr^h + r h h
©2021 NCEES 10
Chapter 1: General Engineering
X'
(h,k) F(h+p/2,k)
Center at (h, k) is the standard form of the equation. When h = k = 0, Focus: (p/2, 0); Directrix: x = –p/2
Source: Brink, R.W. A First Year of College Mathematics. D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. (Prentice Hall), 1937.
(x − h) 2 (y − k) 2 y'
+ = 1 a
a2 b2
x'
(h, k)
©2021 NCEES 11
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Eccentricity:
Focus: (± ae, 0)
Directrix: x = ± a/e
Source: Brink, R.W. A First Year of College Mathematics. D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. (Prentice Hall), 1937.
2 - 2 = 1
a b
(0, b)
(c, 0)
X'
(h, k)
(a, 0)
Eccentricity:
Focus: (± ae, 0)
Directrix: x = ± a/e
Source: Brink, R.W. A First Year of College Mathematics. D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. (Prentice Hall), 1937.
X
0
h
©2021 NCEES 12
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Length of the tangent line from a point on a circle to a point (x′, y′):
r
t
C(h,k)
P(x',y')
X
0
Source: Brink, R.W. A First Year of College Mathematics. D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc. (Prentice Hall), 1937.
/ wi Xi
X=
/ wi
where
wi = weight applied to Xi
The variance of the population is the arithmetic mean of the squared deviations from the population mean. If µ is the
arithmetic mean of a discrete population of size N, the population variance is defined by
σ 2 = ^1/N h:` X1 − µ j + ` X 2 − µ j + f + ` X N − µ j D
2 2 2
N
= ^1/N h / ` Xi − µj2
i=1
©2021 NCEES 13
Chapter 1: General Engineering
n
s 2 = 81/ _ n − 1 iB / ` Xi − X j2
i=1
The sample range R is the largest sample value minus the smallest sample value.
©2021 NCEES 14
Chapter 1: General Engineering
x x x −x x −x x
©2021 NCEES 15
Chapter 1: General Engineering
X 1+ X 2 + f + X n
X=
n
X1+ X2 + f + X k
X=
k
R1+ R2 + f + Rk
R=
k
where
Xi = an individual observation
k = number of groups
R = range, the difference between the largest and smallest observations in a sample of size n
UCL R = D 4 R
LCL R = D3 R
UCL X = X + A 2 R
LCL X = X − A 2 R
©2021 NCEES 16
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.4.2.3 Approximations
The following table and equations may be used to generate initial approximations of the items indicated.
n c4 d2 d3
2 0.7979 1.128 0.853
3 0.8862 1.693 0.888
4 0.9213 2.059 0.880
5 0.9400 2.326 0.864
6 0.9515 2.534 0.848
7 0.9594 2.704 0.833
8 0.9650 2.847 0.820
9 0.9693 2.970 0.808
10 0.9727 3.078 0.797
where
σt = an estimate of σ
©2021 NCEES 17
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Binomial
Coefficient ( nx ) = x!(nn−! x)!
b(x; n , p ) = ( ) p (1 − p )
n x n− x
Binomial np np(1 – p)
x
( ) N −r
r (N − r )n(N − n )
Hyper
h(x; n, r, N ) =
r
() n−x nr
Geometric x
(Nn ) N N 2 (N − 1)
λ x e −λ
Poisson f (x; λ ) = λ λ
x!
Negative
Binomial
f ( y ; r, p) = ( y + r −1 r
r −1 )
p (1 − p ) y r/p r (1 – p)/p2
n!
Multinomial f ( x1, … , xk) = p1x1 … pkxk npi npi (1 – pi)
x1! , … , xk !
1 −x β
Exponential f (x ) = e β β2
β
Weibull f (x ) =
α α − 1 − xα
β
x e β
β1 α Γ[(α + 1) α ] [ ( ) ( )]
β2 α Γ
α +1
α
− Γ2
α +1
α
( )
2
1 x−µ
1 −
Normal f (x ) = e 2 σ
µ σ2
{
σ 2π
2(x − a )
if a ≤ x ≤ m
Triangular f (x ) = (b − a )(m − a ) a+b+m a 2 + b 2 + m 2 − ab − am − bm
3 18
2(b − x )
if m < x ≤ b
(b − a )(b − m )
©2021 NCEES 18
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.5 Statics
1.5.1 Force
A force is a vector quantity. It is defined when its (1) magnitude, (2) point of application, and (3) direction are known.
F = Fx i + Fy j
Separating a force into components when the geometry of force is known and :
M = r × F Mx = yFz – zFy
My = zFx – xFz
Mz = xFy – yFx
M = Σ (rn × Fn)
Equilibrium Requirements
/ Fn = 0
/ Mn = 0
©2021 NCEES 19
Chapter 1: General Engineering
rc = radius vector to the centroid of the total mass from the selected reference point
May = / xn an
Max = / y n a n
xac = May /A = / xn an /A
yac = Max /A = / y n a n /A
where A = / a n
The following equations are for an area, bounded by the axes and the function y = f(x). The centroid of area is defined as
# xdA
xc =
A
# ydA
yc =
A
A = # f ^ xh dx
dA = f ^ xh dx = g _ y i dy
The first moment of area with respect to the y-axis and the x-axis, respectively, are
My = ∫x dA = xc A
Mx = ∫y dA = yc A
Iy = ∫x2 dA
Ix = ∫y2 dA
©2021 NCEES 20
Chapter 1: General Engineering
The polar moment of inertia J of an area about a point is equal to the sum of the moments of inertia of the area about any
two perpendicular axes in the area and passing through the same point:
Iz = J = Iy + Ix = ∫(x2 + y2) dA
= rp2A
x
0
Source: Hibbeler, Russell C. Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics. 10 ed. Pearson, 2004, p. 501.
where
©2021 NCEES 21
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.5.8 Friction
The largest frictional force is called the limiting friction.
F ≤ µs N
where
F = friction force
M = Pr tan (α ± φ)
where
where
F1 = force being applied in the direction of impending motion
©2021 NCEES 22
Chapter 1: General Engineering
A two-force body in static equilibrium has two applied forces that are equal in magnitude, opposite in direction, and
collinear.
©2021 NCEES 23
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Figure Area & Centroid Area Moment of Inertia (Radius of Gyration)2 Product of Inertia
y Ix c = bh /36 3
rx2c = h 182
A = bh/2
I yc = b h/363 ry2c = b 2 18 Ixc yc = Abh 36 = b 2 h 2 72
C h xc = 2b/3
rx2 = h2 6 Ixy = Abh 4 = b 2 h 2 8
yc = h/3 Ix = bh3/12
x ry2 = b2 2
b Iy = b3h/4
y Ix c = bh 3 /36 rx2c = h 2 18
A = bh/2
h I yc = b 3h/36 ry2c = b 2 18 I xc yc = − Abh 36 = − b 2 h 2 72
C xc = b/3
rx2 = h 2 6 I xy = Abh 12 = b 2 h 2 24
x yc = h/3 Ix = bh3/12
ry2 = b 2 6
b Iy = b3h/12
y I xc = bh 3 36 rx2c = h 2 18 I xc yc = [Ah(2a − b )] 36
A = bh/2
C h
xc = (a + b)/3
[ (
Iyc = bh b − ab + a 2 2
)] 36 ry2c (
= b − ab + a
2 2
) 18 [ ]
= bh 2 (2a − b ) 72
x I x = bh 3
12 rx2 =h 6 2
I xy = [Ah(2a + b )] 12
a yc = h/3
b [ (
I y = bh b + ab + a 2 2
)] 12 ry2 (
= b 2 + ab + a 2 6 ) [ ]
= bh 2 (2a + b ) 24
y I xc y c = 0
I xc = b h 3 12 rx2c = h 2 12
I xy = Abh 4 = b 2 h 2 4
C A = bh I yc = b 3 h 12 ry2c = b 2 12
h
xc = b/2 I x = bh 3 3 rx2 = h 2 3
x yc = h/2 I y = b3h 3 ry2 = b 2 3
b (
rp2 = b 2 + h 2 12 )
[ (
J = bh b 2 + h 2 )] 12
y a
A = h(a + b ) 2 I xc =
(
h 3 a 2 + 4ab + b 2 ) rx2c =
(
h 2 a 2 + 4ab + b 2 )
36 (a + b ) 18(a + b )
C h h(2a + b )
yc = h 2
(3a + b)
3(a + b ) h 3 (3a + b ) rx2 =
x Ix = 6(a + b )
b 12
y
( )
I xc = a 3b sin 3 θ 12 rx2c = (a sin θ) 2 12
A = ab sin θ I yc = [ab sin θ (b + a cos θ )] 12
2 2 2
(
ry2c = b 2 + a 2 cos 2 θ 12 )
C xc = (b + a cos θ)/2 ( )
I xc yc = a 3b sin 2 θ cos θ 12
Ix = (a b sin θ) 3 rx2 = (a sin θ) 3 2
a 3 3
b [
I y = ab sin θ (b + a cos θ)
2
]3 − (ab cos θ ) 6
(
− a b sin θ cos θ 6
2 2
)
Housner, George W., and Donald E. Hudson, Applied Mechanics Dynamics, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 1959. Table reprinted by permission of G.W. Housner & D.E. Hudson.
Source: Housner, George W. and Hudson, Donald E. (1980) Applied Mechanics Dynamics. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1980.001
©2021 NCEES 24
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Figure Area & Centroid Area Moment of Inertia (Radius of Gyration)2 Product of Inertia
y I xc = I y c = π a 4 4 rx2c = ry2c = a 2 4
A = πa2 I xc y c = 0
a
C xc = a I x = I y = 5π a 4 4 rx2 = ry2 = 5a 2 4
I xy = Aa 2
yc = a J = πa 2 4
rp2 =a 2 2
y
A = π (a2 – b2)
(
I xc = I y c = π a 4 − b 4 4 ) (
rx2c = ry2c = a 2 + b 2 4 ) I xc y c = 0
a 5πa πb 4 4
rx2 ry2 = (5a +b ) 4 I xy = Aa 2
xc = a
2 2
C Ix = Iy = − πa 2b 2 − =
4 4
b yc = a
(
J = π a4 − b4 2 ) (
rp2 = a 2 + b 2 2 ) (
= πa 2 a 2 − b 2 )
x
(
a 4 9π 2 − 64 ) rx2c =
(
a 2 9π 2 − 64 )
I xc = 36π 2
y A = πa2/2 72π
ryc = a 4 I xc y c = 0
C xc = a I yc = πa 4 8 2 2
I x = πa 4 8 I xy = 2a 4 3
yc = 4a/(3π) rx2 = a 2 4
2a x
I y = 5π a 4 8 ry2 = 5a 2 4
y
a A = a 2θ a 2 (θ − sin θ cos θ)
C Ix = a (θ – sin θ cos θ)/4
4 rx2 = I xc y c = 0
2a sin θ 4 θ
x xc =
3 θ Iy = a (θ + sin θ cos θ)/4
4
a 2
(θ + sin θ cos θ) I xy = 0
yc = 0 ry2 =
4 θ
[ ] [ ] [ ]
y
A = a2 θ −
sin 2θ Aa 2 2sin 3 θ cos θ a2 2sin 3 θ cos θ
a 2 Ix = 1− rx2 = 1− I xc y c = 0
4 3θ − 3sin θ cos θ 4 3θ − 3sin θ cos θ
[ ] [ ]
x I xy = 0
xc =
2a sin 3 θ Aa 2 2sin 3 θ cos θ a2 2sin 3θ cos θ
C Iy = 1+ ry2 = 1+
3 θ − sin θ cos θ 4 θ − sin θ cos θ 4 θ − sin θ cos θ
yc = 0
Housner, George W., and Donald E. Hudson, Applied Mechanics Dynamics, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 1959. Table reprinted by permission of G.W. Housner & D.E. Hudson.
Source: Housner, George W. and Hudson, Donald E. (1980) Applied Mechanics Dynamics. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1980.001
©2021 NCEES 25
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Figure Area & Centroid Area Moment of Inertia (Radius of Gyration)2 Product of Inertia
y
A = 2ab/3 Ix = 2ab3/15 rx2 = b 2 5
C b
xc = 3a/5 Ixy = Aab/4 = a2b2
x Iy = 2ba3/7 ry2 = 3a 2 7
a yc = 3b/8
y A = bh (n + 1)
h 2 (n + 1)
y = (h/b n)xn bh 3 rx2 =
n +1 Ix = 3(3n + 1)
h xc = b 3(3n + 1)
C n+2
hb 3 n +1 2
b x h n +1 Iy = ry2 = b
yc = n+3 n+3
n 2 2n + 1
y n
y = (h/b 1/n)x1/n A= bh n +1 2
n +1 n rx2 = h
Ix = bh 3 3(n + 1)
C n +1 3 n+3
( )
h xc = b
2n + 1 n n +1 2
Iy = b3h ry2 = b
x n +1 3n + 1 3n + 1
b yc = h
n 2(n + 2)
Housner, George W., and Donald E. Hudson, Applied Mechanics Dynamics, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, NJ, 1959. Table reprinted by permission of G.W. Housner & D.E. Hudson.
Source: Housner, George W. and Hudson, Donald E. (1980) Applied Mechanics Dynamics. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1980.001
©2021 NCEES 26
Chapter 1: General Engineering
STRESS, MPa
STRESS, PSI
Source: Flinn, Richard, and Paul K. Trojan. Engineering Materials and Their Applications. 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1990.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
The slope of the linear portion of the curve equals the modulus of elasticity.
1.6.2 Definitions
1.6.2.1 Engineering Strain
ε = ∆L/Lo
where
Ai - A f
% RA = e o # 100
Ai
1.6.2.4 Shear Stress-Strain
γ = τ/G
where
γ = shear strain
τ = shear stress
©2021 NCEES 27
Chapter 1: General Engineering
where
ν = Poisson's ratio
where
K = bulk modulus
E = modulus of elasticity
ν = Poisson's ratio
where
P = loading
A = cross-sectional area
ε = δ/L
where
L = length of member
P A
E= v f=
d L
d = PL
AE
True stress is load divided by actual cross-sectional area whereas engineering stress is load divided by the initial area.
©2021 NCEES 28
Chapter 1: General Engineering
L = length of member
T = final temperature
To = initial temperature
The two nonzero values calculated from this equation are temporarily labeled σa and σb and the third value σc is always
zero in this case. Depending on their values, the three roots are then labeled according to the convention:
algebraically largest = σ1, algebraically smallest = σ3, other = σ2. A typical 2D stress element is shown below with all
indicated components shown in their positive sense.
xy
y
x x
x
xy
r Shear strain
r = reduction in
90° angle
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids, Crandall,
Stephen H., and Normal C. Dahl, 1999; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
©2021 NCEES 29
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1. Tensile normal stress components are plotted on the horizontal axis and are considered positive. Compressive
normal stress components are negative.
2. For constructing Mohr's circle only, shearing stresses are plotted above the normal stress axis when the pair of
shearing stresses, acting on opposite and parallel faces of an element, forms a clockwise couple. Shearing stresses
are plotted below the normal axis when the shear stresses form a counterclockwise couple.
The circle drawn with the center on the normal stress (horizontal) axis with center, C, and radius, R, where
σa = C + R
σb = C – R
cw
in R
y, xy
b a
C
2
x, xy
ccw
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids, Crandall,
Stephen H., and Normal C. Dahl, 1999; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
The maximum inplane shear stress is τin = R. However, the maximum shear stress considering three dimensions is always
σ1 − σ 3
τ max = 2
1.6.5 Torsion
Torsion stress in circular solid or thick-walled (t > 0.1 r) shafts:
Tr
τ= J
©2021 NCEES 30
Chapter 1: General Engineering
τ φz = Gγ φz = Gr _dφ/dz i
T = G _dφ/dz i # r 2 dA = GJ_dφ/dz i
A
T L TL
φ = #
o GJ
dz =
GJ
where
T = torque
L = length of shaft
T/φ gives the twisting moment per radian of twist. This is called the torsional stiffness and is often denoted by the
symbol k or c.
Am = area of a solid shaft of radius equal to the mean radius of the hollow shaft
1.6.7 Beams
1.6.7.1 Shearing Force and Bending Moment Sign Conventions
1. The bending moment is positive if it produces bending of the beam concave upward (compression in top fibers and
tension in bottom fibers).
2. The shearing force is positive if the right portion of the beam tends to shear downward with respect to the left.
Source: Timoshenko, S. and Gleason H. MacCullough. Elements of Strength of Materials. 3rd ed. Van Nostrand (Wadsworth), 1954.
©2021 NCEES 31
Chapter 1: General Engineering
The relationship between the load (w), shear (V), and moment (M) equations are:
dV ^ x h
w ^ x h =−
dx
dM ^ x h
V=
dx
V2 − V1 = #x1x2 7− w^ xhAdx
M 2 − M1 = #x1x2 V^ xhdx
1.6.7.2 Stresses in Beams
The normal stress in a beam due to bending:
σ = –My/I
where
y = distance from the neutral axis to the fiber location above or below the neutral axis
σ = ± Mc/I
where
c = distance from the neutral axis to the outermost fiber of a symmetrical beam section
σ = M/s
where
s = I/c
τxy = VQ/(Ib)
where
V = shear force
Q = Al y l = first moment of area above or below the point where shear stress is to be determined
Source: Hibbeler, Russell C. Mechanics of Materials. 10th ed. Pearson, 2015, pp. 386-387.
where
A′ = area above the layer (or plane) upon which the desired transverse shear stress acts
©2021 NCEES 32
Chapter 1: General Engineering
q = VQ/I
σ1 = -nMy/IT
σ2 = -My/IT
where
y = distance from the neutral axis to the fiber location above or below the neutral axis
The composite section is transformed into a section composed of a single material. The centroid and then the moment of
inertia are found on the transformed section for use in the bending stress equations.
COMPOSITE TRANSFORMED
SECTION SECTION
MATERIAL 1 E1, A1 E2, nA1
NEUTRAL
AXIS
MATERIAL 2 E2, A2 E2, A2
b b
nb
©2021 NCEES 33
Simply Supported Beam Slopes and Deflec�onsSimply Supported Beam Slopes and Deflections
BEAM SLOPE DEFLECTION ELASTIC CURVE MAXIMUM MOMENT
v
P
Mmax ^at cente rh = 4
L L – PL2 – PL3 – Px PL
2 2 θ max = vmax = v= (3L2 – 4x2)
16EI 48EI 48EI
x
θmax vmax 0 ≤ x ≤ L/2
v
L
w
Mmax ^at center h = 8
– wL 3 –5wL4 – wx 3 wL2
θ max = vmax = v= ( x – 2 L x 2 + L3)
x 24EI 384EI 24EI
θ max v max
v –5wL4 – wx ( 3
θ1 =
–3wL 3 v = v= 16x – 24Lx2 + 9L3)
w 128EI x = L/2 768EI 384EI
θ2 0 ≤ x ≤ L/2
Mmax c at x = 8 l m = 128 wL2
3 9
–wL
x vmax = – 0.006563 wL
4
θ2 = 7wL 3 v = 384 (8x3 – 24Lx2
384EI EI EI
L
θ1
L
+ 17L2x – L3)
2 2 at x = 0.4598L L/2 ≤ x < L
v
w0
θ1 =
–7w0 L3 vmax = – 0.00652 w0 L
4
w L2
M max d at x = n= 0
360EI EI –w0 x L
v 4 2 2 4
360 EIL (3x – 10L x + 7L )
= 3
x 9 3
θ2 = w0 L3 at x = 0.5193L
θ1 θ2 45EI
L
Source: Hibbeler, Russell C. Mechanics of Materials. 4th ed. 2000. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., New York, New York.
©2021 NCEES 34
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Can�levered Beam Slopes and Deflec�ons Cantilevered Beam Slopes and Deflections
BEAM SLOPE DEFLECTION ELASTIC CURVE MAXIMUM MOMENT
v P
−Pa2 (3x − a), for x > a
a b v=
vmax
θmax =
−Pa 2
vmax =
−Pa (3L − a)
2 6EI Mmax ^at x = 0 h = Pa
x
2EI 6EI −Px2 (−x + 3a), for x ≤ a
v=
L 6EI
θmax
v
w
Mmax ^at x = 0 h = 2
θmax
− wL 3 vmax
− wL4 –wx2 2 wL2
x =
6EI
=
8EI v= (x − 4L x + 6 L2)
vmax 24EI
L θmax
v θ max
vmax
Mmax ^at all x h = M 0
x M0 L vmax = M0 L
2
M 0x2
θmax =
v=
M0 EI 2EI 2EI
L
v
w
−wx2
(
v = 24EI x 2 − 2L x + 32 L2 (
− wL 3 − 7wL4 0 ≤ x ≤ L/2
Mmax ^at x = 0 h = 8
x θmax = vmax = wL2
vmax 48EI 384EI
−wL 3
L L v= (4x − L/2)
192EI
2 2 θmax L/2 ≤ x ≤ L
v
w0
− w0 L 3 − w0 L 4 − w0 x2 w L2
θmax vmax Mmax ^at x = 0 h = 06
=
(10L3 − 10 L 2 x + 5 Lx2 − x 3)
=
x 24EI 30EI v = 120EIL
vmax
L θmax
Source: Hibbeler, Russell C. Mechanics of Materials. 4th ed. 2000. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., New York, New York.
©2021 NCEES 35
Chapter 1: General Engineering
1.6.8 Columns
Critical axial load for long column subject to buckling:
Euler's Formula
π 2 EI
Pcr =
_ K, i
2
where
Pinned-pinned, K = 1.0
Fixed-fixed, K = 0.5
Fixed-pinned, K = 0.7
Fixed-free, K = 2.0
Pcr 2
σ cr = = π E2
A ^ K,/r h
where
r = radius of gyration =
©2021 NCEES 36
Chapter 1: General Engineering
(P/G, i%, n) G (1 + i ) − 1 −
2G n
Present Worth to P given G G n
0
i (1 + i ) i (1 + i )
2 n n
123 n
P
F
Uniform Gradient
G
(1 + i )n − 1 − n
Future Worth † to F given G 0123 n (F/G, i%, n) i2 i
G
2G
(n –1)G
Uniform Gradient AAA A 1 n
Uniform Series to A given G ( A/G, i%, n) G −
0 i (1 + i )n − 1
12 3 n
G
2G
(n –1)G
B Benefit
BV Book value
C Cost
Dj Depreciation in year j
EV Expected value
©2021 NCEES 37
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Subscripts
j at time j
n at time n
Breakeven analysis is used to describe the percentage of capacity of operation for a manufacturing plant at which income
will just cover expenses.
The payback period is the period of time required for the profit or other benefits of an investment to equal the cost of the
investment.
1.7.4 Inflation
To account for inflation, dollars are deflated by the general inflation rate per interest period f, and then are shifted over
the time scale using the interest rate per interest period i. Use an inflation adjusted interest rate per interest period d for
computing present worth values P.
1.7.5 Depreciation
Straight Line
C − Sn
Dj = n
©2021 NCEES 38
Chapter 1: General Engineering
Capitalized Costs = P = A
i
1.7.8 Rate-of-Return
The minimum acceptable rate-of-return (MARR) is that interest rate that one is willing to accept, or the rate one desires to
earn on investments. The rate-of-return on an investment is the interest rate that makes the benefits and costs equal.
B – C ≥ 0, or B/C ≥ 1
©2021 NCEES 39
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 40
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 41
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 42
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 43
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 44
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 45
Chapter 1: General Engineering
©2021 NCEES 46
2 CONSTRUCTION
2.1 Earthwork Construction and Layout
2.1.1 Excavation and Embankment
Sw
VL = (1 + 100 ) VB
Sh
VC = d1 − 100 n VB
γ WL
VB = e γ F ×VF o + γ
B B
γB
γL =
Sw
1 + 100
γB
γC =
Sh
1−
100
γ d, field
Relative compaction (%) = RC = γ # 100
d, max
Weight/VB
Swell (%) = S w = e − 1 o # 100
Weight/V L
©2021 NCEES 47
Chapter 2: Construction
where
Amount of water to be added or removed from soil to achieve desired soil moisture content:
^desired % of water content h − ^% of water content of borrow h
Gallons of water = desired dry density, lb/ft 3 # 100
compacted volume of soil, ft 3
#
8.33 lb/gal
Available soil compaction techniques can be classified as:
1. Static Pressure – A large stress is slowly applied to the soil and then released.
2. Impact – A stress is applied by dropping a large mass onto the surface of the soil.
3. Vibrating – A stress is applied repeatedly and rapidly via a mechanically driven plate or hammer.
4. Kneading – Shear is applied by alternating movement in adjacent positions.
©2021 NCEES 48
Chapter 2: Construction
FILL
CUT
The average end-area method for earthwork calculates volume V between two consecutive cross sections as the average of
their areas multiplied by the distance between them, where fill is positive and cut is negative:
A +A
V = Le 1 2 o
2
where
V = volume
The prismoidal formula for earthwork calculates volume V between two consecutive cross sections, taking the area of the
midsection into account:
A + 4A m + A 2
V = Le 1 o
6
where
V = volume
Am = area of midsection
©2021 NCEES 49
Chapter 2: Construction
For partial grid squares at edges of an excavation, the amount of material V may be estimated using standard volume
formulas for three-dimensional shapes, such as the following:
200
LIMITS OF
BORROW-PIT
EXCAVATION
150
b
Feet
100
c d
LOCATION OF GRADE-ROD
READING (TYP.)
50
90°
0
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00
A = w ; 2 ` h1 + h n j + h 2 + h3 + h 4 + ... + h n − 1E
1
Simpson’s Rule calculates area A for a section of earthwork as follows, given the elevation values of cut or fill at equal
intervals (e.g., stations) along a baseline:
A = 3 8first value + last value + ^2 # sum of odd-numbered values h + ^4 # sum of even-numbered values hB
1
# length of interval
To use Simpson’s Rule, there must be an even number of intervals. The sum of odd-numbered values (e.g., 3rd, 5th, and 7th
terms) and even-numbered values (e.g., 2nd, 4th, and 6th terms) does not include the first and last terms along the baseline.
©2021 NCEES 50
Chapter 2: Construction
H =cB
# tan R m
2
where
B = base width
H = pile height
L = pile length
R = angle of repose
V = pile volume
D
H = 2 # tan R
©2021 NCEES 51
Chapter 2: Construction
Backsight (BS) = rod reading taken on a point of known elevation to establish elevation of instrument’s line of sight
Foresight (FS) = rod reading taken on a benchmark or turning point to determine its elevation
• Elevation of BM + BS = HI
• Elevation of TP = HI – FS
BS HI FS
TP
BM
EXISTING GRADE
FINAL GRADE PROFILE
DIAGRAM
GRADE POINT
800
600
CUT(cy)
400
200 50 60 70 80 90 MASS
DIAGRAM
10 20 30 40
–200 STATIONS
BALANCE (IN 100 ft)
–400 POINT
FILL(cy)
–600
–800
Profile diagram = plot of existing and final grades along route centerline for planned earthwork
Mass diagram = plot of cumulative earthwork volume moving up-station, with cut (excavation) plotted positive and fill
(embankment) plotted negative
Grade points = locations on profile diagram where final grade matches existing grade, corresponding to maxima or
minima on mass diagram
Balancing points = locations where cumulative volume of cut and fill is zero, i.e., where mass diagram crosses its baseline
• Any horizontal line between two balance points represents a distance between which cut-and-fill quantities are equal.
• The mass-diagram height at any point represents earthwork volume, which corresponds to an area on the profile diagram.
©2021 NCEES 52
Chapter 2: Construction
• The area under the mass diagram at any point represents earthwork volume multiplied by a distance.
• Dividing any area on the mass diagram by its height yields the average haul distance for that earthwork.
Overhaul distance = distance determined by deducting the freehaul distance from the distance between the centers of
gravity of the remaining mass of excavation and the remaining mass of embankment
PROFILE
DIAGRAM
OVERHAUL
VOLUME
FREEHAUL DISTANCE
MASS
DIAGRAM
OVERHAUL
80%
UNIFORMLY
GRADED
WELL
GRADED
60%
PERCENT PASSING
40%
GAP
GRADED
20%
©2021 NCEES 53
Chapter 2: Construction
Cost Estimate Classification Matrix for Building and General Construction Industries
Primary
Secondary Characteristics
Characteristic
Maturity Level of Project Expected Accuracy Range
End Usage
Estimate Definition Deliverables Methodology (typical variation in low
(typical purpose of
Class (expressed as % of (typical estimating method) and high ranges at an 80%
estimate)
complete definition) confidence interval)
ft2 or m2 factoring,
Functional area or concept L: –20% to –30%
Class 5 0% to 2% parametric models,
screening H: +30% to +50%
judgement, or analogy
Schematic design or Parametric models, L: –10% to –20%
Class 4 1% to 15%
concept study assembly-driven models H: +20% to +30%
Design development,
Semidetailed unit costs with L: –5% to –15%
Class 3 10% to 40% budget authorization,
assembly-level line items H: +10% to +20%
feasibility
Control or bid/tender, Detailed unit cost with L: –5% to –10%
Class 2 30% to 75%
semidetailed forced-detailed take-off H: +5% to +15%
Check estimate or prebid/ Detailed unit cost with L: –3% to –5%
Class 1 65% to 100%
tender, change order detailed take-off H: +3% to +10%
Reprinted with the permission of AACE International, 726 East Park Ave., #180, Fairmont, WV 26554, USA. Phone 304-296-8444.
Internet: http://web.aacei.org, E-mail: [email protected]. Copyright © 2020 by AACE International; all rights reserved.
©2021 NCEES 54
Chapter 2: Construction
CARRYDECK CRANE
(ROTATING BOOM)
CARRYDECK CRANE
(FIXED BOOM)
PICK-AND-CARRY CRANE
(FIXED BOOM)
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 55
Chapter 2: Construction
SWING CAB
FIXED CAB
ALL-TERRAIN CRANE
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 56
Chapter 2: Construction
CARRIER
MOUNTED
CRAWLER
MOUNTED
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 57
Chapter 2: Construction
FRONT-MOUNTED TURRET
REAR-MOUNTED TURRET
ARTICULATING OR
KNUCKLE BOOM
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 58
Chapter 2: Construction
JIB FORESTAY
PENDANT
ANTI-TWO-BLOCKING DEVICE
BOOM EXTENSION
TIP SHEAVE
JIB MAST
AUXILIARY HOIST LINE
JIB BACKSTAY
PENDANT JIB HOOK AND
HEADACHE BALL
MAIN BOOM
TIP SHEAVE MAIN
BOOM
HEAD
#3 POWER
TELESCOPING
SECTION OR
MANUAL SECTION MAIN
HOIST LINE
#2 POWER
TELESCOPING MAIN HOOK
SECTION OR BLOCK
#1 POWER
TELESCOPING
SECTION
BOOM
EXTENSION,
STOWED
BOOM
HINGE PIN
BASE BOOM
MAIN HOIST SECTION
COUNTER-
WEIGHT UPPERWORKS
CARRIER
CENTER OF ROTATION
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 59
Chapter 2: Construction
JIB FORESTAY
PENDANT
ANTI-TWO-BLOCKING DEVICE
BOOM EXTENSION
TIP SHEAVE
JIB MAST
JIB BACKSTAY AUXILIARY HOIST LINE
PENDANT
HEADACHE BALL
MAIN
BOOM
BOOM HEAD
EXTENSION,
STOWED
MAIN AUXILIARY
HOIST BOOM HEAD
AUXILIARY
HOIST
OPERATOR’S CAB
ENGINE
OUTRIGGER
PADS
CENTER
RING GEAR
OF ROTATION
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 60
Chapter 2: Construction
ANTI-TWO-BLOCKING DEVICE
OVERHAUL BALL
LIFT CYLINDER
HOIST
FRONT STABILIZERS
TURRET
OR PEDESTAL
TRUCK
CHASSIS
CENTER REAR
OF ROTATION STABILIZERS
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 61
Chapter 2: Construction
CRAWLER-MOUNTED
LATTICE BOOM CRANE
CARRIER-MOUNTED
LATTICE BOOM CRANE
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 62
Chapter 2: Construction
DEFLECTOR
JIB MIDSECTION
(IDLER) SHEAVES
JIB HEEL SECTION
BOOM BOOM TIP SHEAVE
PENDANTS
ANTI-TWO-BLOCKING DEVICE
OUTER
MAIN HOIST LINE
BAIL
MAIN HOOK BLOCK
BOOM HOIST
REEVING
INNER BALL
BACKHITCH
BOOM
HOIST LINE
BOOM HEEL SECTION
COUNTER-
WEIGHT BOOM STOP
TURNTABLE, SWING CIRCLE
MACHINE DECK
CRAWLER ASSEMBLY
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 63
Chapter 2: Construction
ANTI-TWO-
BLOCKING
DEVICE
AUXILIARY
HOIST LINE JIB FORESTAY
PENDANT
HEADACHE
JIB MAST
BALL
OR GANTRY
JIB
DEFLECTOR
SECTIONS
(IDLER) SHEAVES
BOOM TIP
SHEAVE
MAIN
HOIST LINE
BOOM PENDANTS
COUNTERWEIGHT
BOOM HEEL SECTION
TURNTABLE
CARRIER
CENTER OF ROTATION
Source: Headley, James. Mobile Cranes. 4th ed. Sanford, FL: Crane Institute of America, 2002.
©2021 NCEES 64
Chapter 2: Construction
where
To convert the production rate from compacted cubic yards to bank cubic yards, apply a shrinkage factor.
TRUCK CYCLE
RETURN DUMP
HAUL
LOAD
EXCAVATOR CYCLE
©2021 NCEES 65
Chapter 2: Construction
CUSHION
DRIVEHEAD
ELASTIC
ELASTIC
c
COMPRESSIVE
FORCE PULSE
(INCIDENT)
GROUND
SURFACE
COMPRESSIVE
FORCE PULSE
(ATTENUATED)
PILE
SOFT c
LAYER COMPRESSIVE
TENSILE OR FORCE PULSE
COMPRESSIVE
c
FORCE PULSE
(REFLECTED) c PERMANENT
SET
DENSE
(a) (b) (c) (d)
LAYER
Hammer-Pile-Soil System
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI–06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 9-40, p. 9-100.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
R = 2E n
Pallow =
6 S+k
where
k = constant based on hammer type: 0.1 for single-acting air hammer, 1.0 for drop hammer
©2021 NCEES 66
Chapter 2: Construction
where
The number of hammer blows per foot of pile penetration required to obtain the nominal resistance is calculated as follows:
N ft = 12 (10 x)
in which
Fp
PILE
SOIL
(d) REPRESENTATION
OF SOIL MODEL
©2021 NCEES 67
Chapter 2: Construction
5.0
©2021 NCEES 68
Chapter 2: Construction
Maximum Allowable Stresses in Pile for Top-Driven Piles (after AASHTO, 2002; FHWA, 2006a)
Maximum Allowable Stresses
Pile Type
(fy = yield stress of steel; f cl = 28-day compressive strength of concrete; fpe = pile prestress)
Design Stress
0.25 fy
0.33 fy If damage is unlikely, and confirming static and /or dynamic load tests are performed and evaluated
by engineer
Steel H-Piles Driving Stress
0.9 fy
32.4 ksi (223 MPa) for ASTM A-36 (fy = 36 ksi; 248 MPa)
45.0 ksi (310 MPa) for ASTM A-572 or A-690 (fy = 50 ksi; 345 MPa)
Design Stress
0.25 fy
0.33 fy If damage is unlikely, and confirming static and /or dynamic load tests are performed and evaluated
by engineer
Driving Stress
Unfilled Steel Pipe Piles 0.9 fy
27.0 ksi (186 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 1 (fy = 30 ksi; 207 MPa)
31.5 ksi (217 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 2 (fy = 35 ksi; 241 MPa)
40.5 ksi (279 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 3 (fy = 45 ksi; 310 MPa)
Design Stress
0.25 fy (on steel area) plus 0.40 f cl (on concrete area)
Driving Stress
0.9 fy
Concrete-Filled Steel
Pipe Piles 27.0 ksi (186 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 1 (fy = 30 ksi; 207 MPa)
31.5 ksi (217 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 2 (fy = 35 ksi; 241 MPa)
40.5 ksi (279 MPa) for ASTM A-252 Grade 3 (fy = 45 ksi; 310 MPa)
Design Stress
0.33 f cl – 0.27 fpe (on gross concrete area); f cl minimum of 5.0 ksi (34.5 MPa)
fpe generally > 0.7 ksi (5 MPa)
Driving Stress
Compression Limit < 0.85 f cl – fpe (on gross concrete area)
Precast Prestressed Tension Limit (1) < 3 ( f cl )1/2 + fpe (on gross concrete area) US Units*
Concrete Piles
< 0.25 ( f cl )1/2 + fpe (on gross concrete area) SI Units*
©2021 NCEES 69
Chapter 2: Construction
Maximum Allowable Stresses in Pile for Top-Driven Piles (after AASHTO, 2002; FHWA, 2006a) (cont'd)
Maximum Allowable Stresses
Pile Type
(fy = yield stress of steel; f cl = 28-day compressive strength of concrete; fpe = pile prestress)
Design Stress
0.8 to 1.2 ksi (5.5 to 8.3 MPa) for pile toe area depending upon species
Driving Stress
Timber Pile Compression Limit < 3 sa
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI–06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 9-11, p. 9-110.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
2.4 Scheduling
2.4.1 Critical Path Method (CPM) Network Analysis
2.4.1.1 CPM Precedence Relationships
ACTIVITY-ON-NODE
A A
A B
B B
Nomenclature
D = duration
Total Float = LS – ES or LF – EF
©2021 NCEES 70
Chapter 2: Construction
Critical Path = longest continuous chain of activities through the network schedule that establishes the minimum
overall project duration
Critical Activity = activity on the critical path (i.e., an activity with zero total float)
ACTIVITY A ACTIVITY A
ACTIVITY B ACTIVITY B
LEAD LAG
Variances
CV = BCWP – ACWP (Cost Variance = Earned – Actual)
Indices
BCWP
CPI = ACWP c Cost Performance Index = Earned m
Actual
BCWP
SPI = BCWS cSchedule Performance Index = Earned m
Planned
Forecasting
BAC = Original project estimate (Budget at completion)
ETC =
BAC - BCWP _Estimate to complete i
CPI
EAC = _ ACWP + ETC i _Estimate at completion i
Actual units complete
Project completion (%) = # 100
Total units budgeted
where units may be cost, time, or other resources
Resource leveling is minimizing resource conflicts either by adjusting the start times of activities to reduce peak demand for
resources, sometimes within float, or by extending activity durations to reduce peak demand within a constrained resource
limit.
©2021 NCEES 71
Chapter 2: Construction
• No strength test falls below f cl by more than 500 psi when f cl is 5,000 psi or less; or by more than 0.10 f cl
when f cl is more than 5,000 psi.
• For field-cured concrete test cylinders, procedures for protecting and curing concrete shall be improved when the strength
of field-cured cylinders (at the test age designated for f cl ) is less than 85% of that of companion laboratory-cured
cylinders. The 85% limitation shall not apply if the field-cured strength exceeds f cl by more than 500 psi.
• Concrete test cores drilled from existing structures shall be tested no later than 7 days after drilled from structure. The
concrete in an area represented by core tests shall be considered structurally adequate if the average of three cores is equal
to at least 85% of f cl and if no single core is less than 75% of f cl .
Source: Adapted from American Concrete Institute. Authorized reprint from ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for
Structural Concrete and ACI 301-20: Specifications for Concrete Construction. American Concrete Institute.
©2021 NCEES 72
Chapter 2: Construction
Source: Adapted from American Concrete Institute. Authorized reprint from ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for
Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute, 2019, p. 358.
©2021 NCEES 73
Chapter 2: Construction
Source: American Concrete Institute. Authorized reprint from ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.
American Concrete Institute, 2019, p. 382–383.
©2021 NCEES 74
Chapter 2: Construction
Source: Wilson, Michelle L. and Tennis, Paul D. Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. EB001. 17th edition.
Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, USA, 2021, Table 20-3, p. 448.
©2021 NCEES 75
Chapter 2: Construction
where
Actual Losses = B + H + _ E # W i + _1 − W i # F
EMR =
Expected Losses D + H + _ F # W i + _1 − W i # F
where
©2021 NCEES 76
Chapter 2: Construction
D = 100 # / CTii
where
/ Ci = 8 hours
Noise Level (dBA) Permissible Time (hr)
80 32
85 16
90 8
95 4
100 2
105 1
110 0.5
115 0.25
120 0.125
125 0.063
130 0.031
Exposure to impulsive or impact noise should not exceed 140 dB sound pressure level (SPL).
©2021 NCEES 77
3 GEOTECHNICAL
3.1 Lateral Earth Pressures
δa δp
WALL
po po po po
z
ph= Ko po ph= Ko po ph= Ka po ph= Kp po
Overconsolidated Soils
Ko = `1 − sin φlj OCR Ω
Ω = sin φl
©2021 NCEES 78
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
where
Ω = OCR factor
WALL
MOVEMENT
PASSIVE ZONE ACTIVE
ZONE
Development of Rankine Active and Passive Failure Zones for a Smooth Retaining Wall
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 2-20, p. 2-45.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
po = overburden pressure
pa = active pressure
pp = passive pressure
©2021 NCEES 79
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
z FAILURE
FAILURE z SURFACE
SURFACE pp
γ,φ
pa
H c =0
RESULTANT H
Pp
Pa
45+φ/2
45–φ/2
(a) (b)
K a γz 2 K p γz 2
Active force within depth z: Pa = Passive force within depth z: Pp =
2 2
Failure Surfaces, Pressure Distribution and Forces: (a) Active case, (b) Passive case
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 2-21, p. 2-46.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
pa = K a [ γ hw+ γ ′ z w ]
hw
pw = γ w z w
zw
Pa Hw
Pw
©2021 NCEES 80
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
where
pw = water pressure
Source: NAVFAC DM 7.2 Foundations and Earth Structures Design Manual, Department of the Navy—Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Alexandria, VA, September 1986, Figure 2, p. 7.2-62.
2c′ Ka
Z 2c′ Kp Z
Z Z
u p′p p′a u
u p′p p′a u
(a) (b)
(a) Wall Pressures for a Cohesionless Soil and (b) Wall Pressures for Soil with a Cohesion Intercept,
with groundwater in both cases (after Padfield and Mair, 1984)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 10-6, p. 10-15.www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf
©2021 NCEES 81
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
p
p
where
©2021 NCEES 82
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
Design Criteria for Cast-in-Place (CIP) Concrete Retaining Walls (after NAVFAC)
GRAVITY WALL Definitions
B = width of the base of the footing
tan δb = friction factor between soil and base (see table below)
W = weight at the base of wall; includes weight of wall for gravity
g walls; includes weight of soil above footing for cantilever and
Pv Pa counterfort walls
W
c = cohesion of the foundation soil
VERTICAL STEM
g Criteria for Eccentricity, e
a Pa e = d− 2
B
W Pv
TOE OF e # B/6 for soils
SLAB Ph e # B/4 for rocks
R b
BASE OF Factor of Safety against Sliding
q min HEEL
FOOTING F OF SLAB `W + Pv j tan δb + caB
q eq FSs = $ 1.5 ^min h
d SOIL PRESSURE Ph
q max
B EQUIVALENT UNIFORM
BASE PRESSURE
Applied Stress at Base (qmax, qmin, qeq)
`W + Pv j
COUNTERFORT WALL qmax = c1 + 6e m
B B
`W + Pv j
qmin = c1 − 6e m
COUNTERFORT B B
W Pv Pa `W + Pv j
qeq =
Bl
A A Ph where Bl = B − 2e
R
Use uniform stress, qeq, for soils and settlement analysis; use trapezoidal
distribution with qmax and qmin for rocks and structural analysis.
F
q eq SECTION A-A
q max B
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 10-17, p. 10-39.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf
©2021 NCEES 83
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
Wall Friction and Adhesion for Dissimilar Materials (after NAVFAC, 1986b)
Friction Factor, Friction Angle,
Interface Materials
tan δ δ (degrees)
Mass concrete on the following foundation materials:
Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixtures, well-graded rock fill with spalls 0.40 22
Clean sand, silty sand-gravel mixtures, single size hard rock fill 0.30 17
Silty sand, gravel or sand mixed with silt or clay 0.25 14
Fine sandy silt, nonplastic silt 0.20 11
Formed concrete or concrete sheet piling against the following soils:
Clean gravel, gravel-sand mixture, well-graded rock fill with spalls 0.40 to 0.50 22 to 26
Clean sand, silty sand-gravel mixture, single size hard rock fill 0.30 to 0.40 17 to 22
Silty sand, gravel or sand mixed with silt or clay 0.30 17
Fine sandy silt, nonplastic silt 0.25 14
Various structural materials:
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 10-1, p. 10-18.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf
©2021 NCEES 84
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
z = nH
l
A A FOR m > 0.4: H Ph Ph = 0.55Q l
z
FOR m > 0.4:
p H = 1.77
2 m2 n 2 z
(m 2 + n 2 )3 ph H = 1.28 m2 n
h Qp
Q l (m 2 + n 2 )2
ph = ph cos 2 (1.1)
WALL
ph 0.64Q l
Qp RESULTANT Ph =
( m 2 +1)
ph
PRESSURES FROM LINE LOAD Q l
x =m H
(BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT)
m = 0.7 0.5
n = z/ H
0.5
0.6
0.6 m z
0.7
m PhH / Qp z 0.7
0.1 0.60H
0.2 0.78 0.59H 0.8 0.3 0.60H
0.8 0.4 0.78 0.59H 0.5 0.56H
0.9 0.6 0.45 0.48H 0.9 0.7 0.48H
1.0 1.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
ph ( H 2 / Q p ) ph ( H / Q l )
/2
ph (due to q)= q K
2q
ph = (– sin cos 2)
K = K a , Ko , Kp
ph AS APPROPRIATE
AND IN RADIANS
PRESSURE FROM STRIP LOAD PRESSURES FROM UNIFORM SURCHARGE
©2021 NCEES 85
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
P
a
2P
Z Zc =Ka πγ
d= I 2P
FOR Zc ≤ Z≤ d Ka πγ
σh = 2P γ L
σh
π • a+L
FOR Z >d
σh = Ka • γ • Z
σh
©2021 NCEES 86
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
where
,q
RGE
CHA
SUR
i BACKFILL
NE
LA
EP
kvWs
UR
k hWs
IL
FA
WALL Ws
H
R
PAE
©2021 NCEES 87
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
0.8
=20°
0.6 25°
30° kv = 0.2
35° 0.0
40° -0.2
0.4 45°
0.2
= 35°
==ii = kv = 0 = i=0
= /2 = /2
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
HORIZONTAL SEISMIC COEFFICIENT (kh)
Effects of Seismic Coefficients and Friction Angle on Seismic Active Pressure Coefficient (after Lam and Martin, 1986)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4, Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems.
FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, June 1999, Fig. 56, p. 116.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 88
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
3.2 Consolidation
FIELD VIRGIN
CONSOLIDATION
FIELD VIRGIN
CONSOLIDATION
e e
eo
RATIO,
eo A
RATIO,
B
A
LABORATORY
C
VOID
ef CONSOLIDATION B
LABORATORY
VOID CONSOLIDATION
C
ef Cc
SEATING Cc
p vs = PRESSURE D
0.42 e o SEATING
p vs = PRESSURE D
0.42 e o
p vs p o= p c p f
LOG EFFECTIVE p oAPPLIED
p vs VERTICAL = p c p f PRESSURE, '
v
LOG EFFECTIVE VERTICAL APPLIED PRESSURE, 'v
(a) NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED SOIL
(a) NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED SOIL
B
eo F
eo
A CB
r FIELD VIRGIN
F
A Cr CONSOLIDATION
FIELD VIRGIN
e e
LABORATORY CONSOLIDATION
C
RATIO,
CONSOLIDATION D
LABORATORY
CONSOLIDATION Cr C D
RATIO,
Cr Cc
VOID
ef Cc
VOID
ef
0.42 e o
0.42 e o
p vs po pc pf
p vs po pc pf
LOG EFFECTIVE VERTICAL APPLIED PRESSURE, 'v
LOG EFFECTIVE VERTICAL APPLIED PRESSURE, 'v
(b) OVERCONSOLIDATED SOIL
(b) OVERCONSOLIDATED SOIL
Construction of Field Virgin Consolidation Relationships (adapted from USACE, 1994)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 7-9, p. 7-22.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 89
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
eo = ec vo = vc
VOID RATIO, e
Cc Cc
VERTICAL STRAIN,
1 log cycle 1 log cycle
ef vf
VERTICAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, p (LOG SCALE) VERTICAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, p (LOG SCALE)
(a) (b)
pc pc
VERTICAL STRAIN,
eo vo
ec vc
C r
VOID RATIO, e
Cr 1 log 1 log
Cc C c
cycle cycle
1 log cycle 1 log cycle
ef vf
VERTICAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, p (LOG SCALE) VERTICAL EFFECTIVE STRESS, p (LOG SCALE)
(a) (b)
©2021 NCEES 90
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
n
Ho p p
Sc = / 1 + e eC r log10 p c + Cc log10 pf o
1 o o c
n
p pf
Sc = / Ho eC r ε log10 p c + Ccε log10 pc
o
1 o
where
Cc = compression index
Cr = recompression index
pc = preconsolidation pressure
Sc = consolidation settlement
DRAINAGE
ust
a c
C1
C2
CONSOLIDATING
LAYER
us u po
b d
usb ui pt
DRAINAGE
©2021 NCEES 91
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
where
ust = hydrostatic pore water pressure at top of layer
∆pt = ∆u + ∆p0
cv t
Tv =
_ Hd i
2
Tv _ Hd i2
t = cv
where
cv = coefficient of consolidation (ft2/day or m2/day)
t = time (day)
Average Degree of Consolidation, U, Versus Time Factor, Tv, for Uniform Initial Increase in Pore Water Pressure
U% Tv
0 0.000
10 0.008
20 0.031
30 0.071
40 0.126
50 0.197
60 0.287
70 0.403
80 0.567
90 0.848
93.1 1.000
95.0 1.163
98.0 1.500
99.4 2.000
100.0 Infinity
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 7-4, p. 7-32.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 92
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO, PC / PO
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
1.0
B/H=4
0.8
0.2 CLAY
STRATUM H
“INCOMPRESSIBLE”
FRICTION ANGLE, φ
COHESION, c
FRICTION ANGLE, φ
where
t = shear strength
c = total cohesion
sn = normal stress
f = friction angle
©2021 NCEES 93
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
where
0.6
SKEMPTON (1957)
0.4
0 100 200
PLASTICITY INDEX, PI
Relationship Between the Ratio of Undrained Shear Strength to Effective Overburden Pressure and
Plasticity Index for Normally Consolidated and Overconsolidated Clays (after Holtz and Kovacs, 1981)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 5-20, p. 5-54.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 94
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
30
20
SOFT CLAYS
10 SOFT AND STIFF CLAYS
SHALES
CLAY MINERALS
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 200 400 600 1000
PLASTICITY INDEX, PI (%)
©2021 NCEES 95
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
SETTLEMENT
(a) GENERAL SHEAR
LOAD
SETTLEMENT
(b) LOCAL SHEAR
LOAD
SETTLEMENT
TEST AT
GREATER
DEPTH
Modes of Bearing Capacity Failure (after Vesic, 1975): (a) General shear (b) Local shear (c) Punching shear
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 8-14, p. 8-17.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 96
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
q = qappl + γ a Df
where
Df = depth of footing
Bf = width of footing
* Surface surcharge may be a temporary condition. Check all loading conditions that may apply.
3.4.2.1 Bearing Capacity Equation for Concentrically Loaded Square or Rectangular Footings
q ult = c _ Nc i sc + q ` Nq j sq + 0.5γ _ Bf i` N γ j s γ
Source: Based on information from LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2004/2006 with Interims.
©2021 NCEES 97
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
Source: From LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd ed., 2004/2006 with Interims, by the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC Used with permission.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 8-5, p. 8-27.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 98
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
Llf = Lf − 2e L
Al = Blf # Llf
where
Lf = footing length
q = contact pressure
eL Lf
eB
Bf
Notations for Footings Subjected to Eccentric, Inclined Loads (after Kulhawy, 1983)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 8-16, p. 8-25. www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 99
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
B f − 2e B
eB P eB P
q min
q max q eq
Bf Bf
(a) (b)
Eccentrically Loaded Footing with: (a) Linearly varying pressure distribution (structural design),
(b) Equivalent uniform pressure distribution (sizing the footing)
Figure Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 8-17, p. 8-26. www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
qmax = BL c1 + B m, qmin = BL c1 − B m
P 6e P 6e B
for e 1 6
4P B
qmax = for e 2 6
3L _ B − 2e i
1.2
0.9
1.5
2.1
1.8
1.5
1.8
2.1
1.2
0.9 m
0
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.3 m
4B 3B 2B B BB B 2B 3B 4B
0.8qo
B 0.4qo B
qo 0.4qo 0.2qo
01
0.
qo
2B . 02 0.1qo 2B
0
o
0.08qo
4q
0.0
3B 0.2qo 3B
0.04qo
4B 4B
5B 0.02qo 5B
6B 6B
DEPTH
DEPTH
0.1qo
7B 0.01qo 7B
8B 0.08qo 8B
9B 9B
0.005qo
10B 10B
0.06qo
11B 11B
4B 3B 2B B 0 0 B 2B 3B 4B
INFINITELY LONG FOUNDATION SQUARE FOUNDATION
(a) (b)
Vertical Stress Contours (Isobars) Based on Boussinesq’s Theory for Continuous and
Square Footings (modified after Sowers, 1979; AASHTO, 2002)
Source: From Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 2002, by the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC Used with permission.
2 2
1 1 z
P1
=
(Bz) 1
B+z
P
L
z
B
P
p= L+z
(B+z)(L+z)
(a)
B+z
EXACT DISTRIBUTION B
BASED ON THEORY
q applied
OF ELASTICITY
2 2
Z APPROXIMATE
1 1
DISTRIBUTION, p
(b)
Distribution of Vertical Stress by the 2:1 Method (after Perloff and Baron, 1976)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 2-10, p. 2-27.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. II. FHWA-NHI-06-089. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 8-13, p. 8-59.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
Elastic Constants of Various Soils (after AASHTO 2004, with 2006 interims)
Typical Range of Young’s
Soil Type Poisson’s Ratio, n
Modulus Values, Es (tsf)
Clay:
Soft sensitive 25–150
0.4–0.5 (undrained)
Medium stiff to stiff 150–500
Very stiff 500–1,000
Loess 150–600 0.1–0.3
Silt 20–200 0.3–0.35
Fine Sand:
Loose 80–120
0.25
Medium dense 120–200
Dense 200–300
Sand:
Loose 100–300 0.20–0.36
Medium dense 300–500
Dense 500–800 0.30–0.40
Gravel:
Loose 300–800 0.20–0.35
Medium dense 800–1,000
Dense 1,000–2,000 0.30–0.40
Estimating Es from SPT N-value
Soil Type Es (tsf)
Silts, sandy silts, slightly cohesive mixtures 4 N160
Clean fine to medium sands and slightly silty sands 7 N160
Coarse sands and sands with little gravel 10 N160
Sandy gravel and gravels 12 N160
Estimating Es (tsf) from qc Static Cone Resistance
Sandy soils 2qc where (qc is in tsf)
Note: 1 tsf = 95.76 kPa
Source: Based on information from LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd ed., 2004/2006 with Interims, by the
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
where
Iz
∆Hi = Hc e XE o
s
Si = estimate of the immediate settlement of spread footing
Hc = thickness of layer
C1 = 1 − 0.5 e o o $ 0.5
p
∆p
where
t = time _ years i
Lf = LENGTH OF FOOTING
2Bf Bf = LEAST WIDTH OF FOOTING
AXISYMMETRIC
Lf /Bf =1
3Bf
4Bf
Bf
(WIDTH OF FOOTING)
∆p = p – po
p
po
pop
Bf /2 (FOR AXISYMMETRIC CASE)
Bf (FOR PLANE STRAIN CASE)
Explanation of Pressure Terms in Equation for Izp (after Schmertmann et alia, 1978)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. II.
FHWA-NHI-06-089. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 8-21, p. 8-46.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06089.pdf.
__
D
d
H b:1 1
H
8 b d0
0.1
FIRM BASE D=dH 0.2 DEEP
0.3
CIRCLE
7 = TOTAL UNIT WEIGHT OF SOIL
0.5 1.0
1.5
2 3
6
·∞
5.53 d
CLE
5 E CIR
TO
4
3.83 COT
cot
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 1.5 2 3 4 5
6 10 ∞
0
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
SLOPE ANGLE - (DEG)
STABILITY NUMBER
4 5
xo
CRITICAL CENTER
UNIT CENTER ORDINATE – yo
3 4
UNIT CENTER ABSCISSA – xo
Yo b:1 yYoo
yyooHH
H
2 3
MID-PO
d = 3.0
Xo = zxoH d = 0.5 2.5
INT CIR
2.0
dd =
=Ø
=0Ø 1.5 0.3
1 2 TO 1.0
CIR E
CLES
ES ES CLE
CL IRCL
R
0
0 CI
E
C 1
E
TO BAS cot
D cot
AN 0.25 0.50 610 ∞
1.0 1.5 2 3 4 610
-1 0.25 0.50 1.0 1.5 2 3 4 610 ∞ 0
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 SLOPE ANGLE - (DEG)
SLOPE ANGLE - (DEG)
0.35
H
(A)
DH = H; D = 1 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
AND FAILURE ARC IN
nH
CASE 3 DH (CASE 2) ZONE A. CRITICAL
CIRCLE PASSES
CASE 2 CASE 1 (B) THROUGH TOE AND
0.30 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION SHOWING VARIOUS CASES
STABILITY NUMBER
REPRESENTED IN CHART
CONSIDERED IN ZONE B.
BY FULL LINES.
CASE 1: THE MOST DANGEROUS OF THE CIRCLES PASSING
THROUGH THE TOE; REPRESENTED BY FULL LINES IN
CHART. WHERE FULL LINES DO NOT APPEAR,THIS CASE IS
NOT APPRECIABLY DIFFERENT FROM CASE 2.
ZONE B
LONG DASHED LINES DO NOT APPEAR, THE CRITICAL
ZONE A
CIRCLE PASSES THROUGH THE TOE.
d 5
0.20
dd0, DD∞∞
0,
0, 10
0.05
1
d
D
°,
10
d
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
SLOPE ANGLE,
Taylor’s Chart for Soils with Friction Angle (after Taylor, 1948)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 6-14, p. 6-27.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
0.19
For > 54°, use the figure on the previous page.
= 53°
0.18
°
45
0.17
n=
°
3
30
.5°
22
0.16
°
15
2
0.15
STABILITY NUMBER c d / H
1
0.14
°
7.5
0.13 nH
0
H
DH
0.12 CASE A. USE FULL LINES OF CHART; SHORT
DASHED LINES GIVE n VALUES.
0.11
H
DH
0.10 CASE B. USE LONG DASHED LINES OF CHART.
0.09
1 2 3 4
DEPTH FACTOR D
Taylor’s Chart for φl = 0 Conditions for Slope Angles (β) less than 54o (after Taylor, 1948)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 6-15, p. 6-28.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
STRATUM 1 c1 , 1
1
b g
STRATUM 2 2 c2 , 2 1
STRATUM 3 c f
3 c3 , 3
POTENTIAL
d 2 SLIDING
SURFACE
POTENTIAL FIRM BASE
SLIDING SURFACE e
4
P
W
hwi
R
hwi P
w m
Cm
L
L
Pw
hwii m W
CmL
Pw R
RESULTANT HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR A WEDGE
hwii w SLIDING ALONG a b c d e ( P ) . ( A GENERAL CASE)
P
hwi
W
P
R
hwii
W
L m
C mL
R
Pw
m Cm L
hw i w
Pw
hwii w RESULTANT HORIZONTAL FORCE FOR A WEDGE
SLIDING ALONG e f g ( P ) . ( A GENERAL CASE)
HI hW kW
W
FAILURE H2
PLANE
W = WEIGHT OF WEDGE
kW PWJ = WATER FORCE ON THE JOINT REACTION = 1/2 w • h2w
PWJ W PWR = WATER FORCE ON THE ASSUMED
cL FAILURE PLANE = 1/2 w • hw • L
L k = SEISMIC COEFFICIENT TO ACCOUNT FOR
w • h W
DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL FORCE
PWR
b
SLOPE
SURFACE S
N h
W W
N β
T
S
FORCE POLYGON
N
FAILURE
SURFACE
dv
P
Mp = moment about center of circle produced by water force acting on top of slice
R = radius of circle
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Slope Stability. EM 1110-2-1902. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Army, October 2003, Fig. C-10, p. C-15.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1902.pdf.
b b
W
W'
α N α N'
b. SLICE FOR TOTAL STRESS ANALYSIS c. SLICE FOR EFFECTIVE STRESS ANALYSIS
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 6-1, p. 6-21.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Guidelines for Minimum Number of Exploration Points and Depth of Exploration (modified after FHWA, 2002a)
Minimum Number of Exploration Points
Application Minimum Depth of Exploration
and Location of Exploration Points
1. A minimum of one exploration point for each 1. Investigate to a depth below bottom of wall
retaining wall. between 1 and 2 times the wall height or a
2. For retaining walls more than 100 ft (30 m) in minimum of 10 ft (3 m) into bedrock.
length, exploration points spaced every 100 to 2. Exploration depth should be great enough to fully
200 ft (30 to 60 m) with locations alternating penetrate soft highly compressible soils (e.g.,
from in front of the wall to behind the wall. peat, organic silt, soft fine-grained soils) into
Retaining Walls 3. For anchored walls, additional exploration points competent material of suitable bearing capacity
in the anchorage zone spaced at 100 to 200 ft (30 (e.g., stiff to hard cohesive soil, compact dense
to 60 m). cohesionless soil, or bedrock).
4. For soil-nail walls, additional exploration points
at a distance of 1.0 to 1.5 times the height of the
wall behind the wall spaced at 100 to 200 ft (30
to 60 m).
1. A minimum of one exploration point every 200 1. Exploration depth should be, at a minimum, equal
ft (60 m) (erratic conditions) to 400 ft (120 m) to twice the embankment height unless a hard
(uniform conditions) of embankment length stratum is encountered above this depth.
along the centerline of the embankment. 2. If soft strata are encountered extending to a depth
2. At critical locations, (e.g., maximum greater than twice the embankment height, the
Embankment
embankment heights, maximum depths of soft exploration depth should be great enough to fully
Foundations
strata) a minimum of three explorations points penetrate the soft strata into competent material
in the transverse direction to define the existing (e.g., stiff to hard cohesive soil, compact to dense
subsurface conditions for stability analyses. cohesionless soil, or bedrock).
3. For bridge approach embankments, at least one
exploration point at abutment locations.
1. A minimum of one exploration point every 200 1. Exploration depth should be, at a minimum, 15 ft
ft (60 m) (erratic conditions) to 400 ft (120 m) (4.5 m) below the minimum elevation of the cut
(uniform conditions) of slope length. unless a hard stratum is encountered below the
2. At critical locations (e.g., maximum cut depths, minimum elevation of the cut.
maximum depths of soft strata) a minimum 2. Exploration depth should be great enough to
of three explorations points in the transverse fully penetrate through soft strata into competent
Cut Slopes
direction to define the existing subsurface material (e.g., stiff to hard cohesive soil, compact
conditions for stability analyses. to dense cohesionless soil, or bedrock).
3. For cut slopes in rock, perform geologic mapping 3. In locations where the base of the cut is below
along the length of the cut slope. ground-water level, increase depth of exploration
as needed to determine the depth of underlying
pervious strata.
Guidelines for Minimum Number of Exploration Points and Depth of Exploration (cont'd)
Minimum Number of Exploration Points
Application Minimum Depth of Exploration
and Location of Exploration Points
1. For substructure (e.g., piers or abutments) widths Depth of exploration should be:
less than or equal to 100 ft (30 m), a minimum of
one exploration point per substructure. 1. Great enough to fully penetrate unsuitable
foundation soils (e.g., peat, organic silt, soft fine-
2. For substructure widths greater than 100 ft (30 grained soils) into competent material of suitable
m), a minimum to two exploration points per bearing capacity (e.g., stiff to hard cohesive soil,
substructure. compact to dense cohesionless soil or bedrock);
3. Additional exploration points should be provided and
if erratic subsurface conditions or sloping rock 2. At least to a depth where stress increase due to
surfaces are encountered. estimated footing load is less than 10% of the
Shallow applied stress at the base of the footing; and
Foundations
3. In terms of the width of the footing, at least 2
times for axisymmetric case and 4 times for strip
footing (interpolate for intermediate cases); and
4. If bedrock is encountered before the depth
required by item 2 above is achieved, exploration
depth should be great enough to penetrate a
minimum of 10 ft (3 m) into the bedrock, but rock
exploration should be sufficient to characterize
compressibility of infill material of near-
horizontal to horizontal discontinuities.
1. For substructures (e.g., bridge piers or 1. In soil, depth of exploration should extend
abutments) widths less than or equal to 100 ft below the anticipated pile or shaft tip elevation
(30 m), a minimum of one exploration point per a minimum of 20 ft (6 m), or a minimum of
substructure. two times the maximum pile group dimensions,
2. For substructure widths greater than 100 ft (30 whichever is deeper. All borings should extend
m), a minimum of two exploration points per through unsuitable strata such as unconsolidated
substructure. fill, peat, highly organic materials, soft fine-
grained soils, and loose coarse-grained soils to
3. Additional exploration points should be provided reach hard to dense materials.
if erratic subsurface conditions are encountered.
2. For piles bearing on rock, a minimum of 10
Deep 4. Due to large expense associated with construction ft (3 m) of rock core shall be obtained at each
Foundations of rock-socketed shafts, conditions should be exploration point location to verify that the boring
confirmed at each shaft location. has not terminated on a boulder.
3. For shafts supported on or extending into rock,
a minimum of 10 ft (3 m) of rock core, or a
length of rock core equal to at least three times
the shaft diameter for isolated shafts or two
times the maximum shaft group dimension,
whichever is greater, shall be extended below the
anticipated shaft tip elevation to determine the
physical characteristics of rock within the zone of
foundation influence.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 3-13, p. 3-84 and 3-85.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
k If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200 (0.075 mm), add "with sand" or "with gravel, " whichever is predominant.
l If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 (0.075 mm), predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name.
m If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 (0.075 mm), predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name.
n PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above "A" line.
o PI < 4 and plots below "A" line.
p PI plots on or above "A" line.
q PI plots below "A" line.
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil
Classification System). Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
PI = LL − PL
w − PL
LI = PI
where
L
20 o rO
CL MH or OH
10
7 ML or OL
CL-ML
4
0
0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Cu< 4 AND/OR 1 > Cc > 3 FINES = ML OR MH GP - GM < 15% SAND POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT
≥ 15% SAND POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND
FINES = CL, CH,
(OR CL-ML)
GP - GC < 15% SAND POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH CLAY (OR SILTY CLAY)
≥ 15% SAND POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH CLAY AND SAND
(OR SILTY CLAY OR SAND)
FINES = ML OR MH GM < 15% SAND SILTY GRAVEL
> 12% FINES ≥ 15% SAND SILTY GRAVEL WITH SAND
FINES = CL OR CH GC < 15% SAND CLAYEY GRAVEL
≥ 15% SAND CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND
FINES = CL-ML GC - GM
< 15% SAND SILTY, CLAYEY GRAVEL
≥ 15% SAND SILTY, CLAYEY GRAVEL WITH SAND
< 5% FINES Cu ≥ 6 AND 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 SW < 15% GRAVEL WELL-GRADED SAND
≥ 15% GRAVEL WELL-GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL
Cu < 6 AND/OR 1 > Cc > 3 SP < 15% GRAVEL POORLY GRADED SAND
≥ 15% GRAVEL POORLY GRADED SAND WITH GRAVEL
Flow Chart to Determine the Group Symbol and Group Name for Coarse-Grained Soils (ASTM D 2487)
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).
Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 119
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 SILTY CLAY
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL SILTY CLAY WITH SAND
4 ≤ PI ≤ 7 AND CL – ML % SAND < % GRAVEL SILTY CLAY WITH GRAVEL
INORGANIC PLOTS ON OR ABOVE < 15% GRAVEL SANDY SILTY CLAY
% SAND ≥ % GRAVEL
"A" LINE ≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200 ≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY SILTY CLAY WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY SILTY CLAY
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY SILTY CLAY WITH SAND
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 SILT
LL < 50 15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL SILT WITH SAND
PI < 4 OR PLOTS ML % SAND < % GRAVEL SILT WITH GRAVEL
BELOW "A" LINE % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY SILT
≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200 ≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY SILT WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY SILT
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY SILT WITH SAND
LL – OVEN DRIED
ORGANIC < 0.75 OL SEE FIGURE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE
LL – NOT DRIED
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 FAT CLAY
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL FAT CLAY WITH SAND
PI PLOTS ON OR CH % SAND < % GRAVEL FAT CLAY WITH GRAVEL
ABOVE "A" LINE % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY FAT CLAY
≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200 ≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY FAT CLAY WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY FAT CLAY
INORGANIC ≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY FAT CLAY WITH SAND
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 ELASTIC SILT
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL ELASTIC SILT WITH SAND
PI PLOTS MH % SAND < % GRAVEL ELASTIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
LL ≥ 50 BELOW "A" LINE % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY ELASTIC SILT
≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200 ≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY ELASTIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY ELASTIC SILT
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY ELASTIC SILT WITH SAND
LL – OVEN DRIED
ORGANIC < 0.75 OH SEE FIGURE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE
LL – NOT DRIED
Flow Chart to Determine the Group Symbol and Group Name for Fine-Grained Soils (ASTM D 2487)
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).
Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
©2021 NCEES 120
Chapter 3: Geotechnical
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 ORGANIC CLAY
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL ORGANIC CLAY WITH SAND
% SAND < % GRAVEL ORGANIC CLAY WITH GRAVEL
PI ≥ 4 OR PLOTS < 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC CLAY
% SAND ≥ % GRAVEL
ABOVE "A" LINE ≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200
≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC CLAY WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC CLAY
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC CLAY WITH SAND
OL < 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 ORGANIC SILT
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND
% SAND < % GRAVEL ORGANIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
PI < 4 OR PLOTS % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC SILT
BELOW "A" LINE ≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200
≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC SILT
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND
< 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 ORGANIC CLAY
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL ORGANIC CLAY WITH SAND
% SAND < % GRAVEL ORGANIC CLAY WITH GRAVEL
PLOTS ON OR % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC CLAY
ABOVE "A" LINE ≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200
≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC CLAY WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC CLAY
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC CLAY WITH SAND
OH < 30% PLUS NO. 200 < 15% PLUS NO. 200 ORGANIC SILT
15–29% PLUS NO. 200 % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND
% SAND < % GRAVEL ORGANIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
PLOTS % SAND ≥ % GRAVEL < 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC SILT
BELOW "A" LINE ≥ 30% PLUS NO. 200
≥ 15% GRAVEL SANDY ORGANIC SILT WITH GRAVEL
% SAND < % GRAVEL < 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC SILT
≥ 15% SAND GRAVELLY ORGANIC SILT WITH SAND
Flow Chart to Determine the Group Symbol and Group Name for Organic Soils (ASTM D 2487)
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2487. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil
Classification System). Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2488. Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
(Visual-Manual Procedures). Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations,
Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Particle Size Definition for Gravels and Sands (after ASTM D 2488)
Component Grain Size Determination
12"+
Boulders* Measurable
(300 mm+)
3"–12"
Cobbles* Measurable
(300 mm–75 mm)
Gravel:
3/4"–3"
Coarse Measurable
(19 mm–75 mm)
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2488. Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
(Visual-Manual Procedures). Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations,
Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Adjectives for Describing Size Distribution for Sands and Gravels (after ASTM D 2488)
Particle-Size Adjective Abbreviation Size Requirement
Coarse c. < 30% m–f sand or < 12% f. gravel
Coarse to medium c–m < 12% f. sand
Medium to fine m–f < 12% c. sand and > 30% m. sand
Fine f. < 30% m. sand or < 12% c. gravel
Coarse to fine c–f > 12% of each size1
1 12% and 30% criteria can be modified depending on fines content. The key is the shape of the particle-size
distribution curve. If the curve is relatively straight or dished down, and coarse sand is present, use c-f; also use
m-f sand if a moderate amount of m. sand is present. If one has any doubts, determine the above percentages base
on the amount of sand or gravel present.
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM D2488. Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
(Visual-Manual Procedures). Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Soils and Foundations,
Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I.
FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-6, p. 4-10.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I.
FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-7, p. 4-13.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
AASHTO Soil Classification System Based on AASHTO M 145 (or ASTM D 3282)
Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials
General
[35 percent or less of total sample [More than 35 percent of total sample
Classification
passing No. 200 sieve (0.075 mm)] passing No. 200 sieve (0.075 mm)]
A-1 A-2 A-7
Group
A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7-5,
Classification A-1-a A-1-b A-2-4 A-2-5 A-2-6 A-2-7
A-7-6
Sieve Analysis
Percent Passing:
No. 10 50 max.
(2 mm)
No. 200 15 max. 25 max. 10 max. 35 max. 35 max. 35 max. 35 max. 36 min. 36 min. 36 min. 36 min.
(0.075 mm)
Characteristics of
Fraction
Passing No. 40
(0.425 mm):
Liquid Limit 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min. 40 max. 41 min.
Plasticity Index 6 max. NP 10 max. 10 max. 11 min. 11 min. 10 max. 10 max. 11 min. 11 min.*
Usual Significant
Stone fragments, Fine
Constituent Silty or clayey gravel and sand Silty soils Clayey soils
gravel and sand sand
Materials
Group Index** 0 0 0 4 max. 8 max. 12 max. 16 max. 20 max.
Classification procedure: With required test data available, proceed from left to right on chart; correct group will be found by process
of elimination. The first group from left into which the test data will fit is the correct classification.
*Plasticity Index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to less than LL minus 30. Plasticity Index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30
(see AASHTO Plasticity Chart on the following page).
**See Group Index formula. Group Index should be shown in parentheses after Group Classification as A-2-4(0), A-5(11), etc.
Source: Based on information from M 145 Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil–Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction
Purposes, 1991, by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
70
60
50
PLASTICITY INDEX
40
A-7-6
30
A-2-6
A-6
20
A-2-7
A-7-5
10
A-2-4 A-2-5
A-4 A-5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LIQUID LIMIT
Group Index
To evaluate the quality of a soil as a highway subgrade material, a number called the group index (GI) is also incorporated
along with the groups and subgroups of the soil. The group index is written in parenthesis after the group or subgroup
designation. The group index is given by the following equation:
where
GI = group index
When calculating the group index for soils that belong to groups A-2-6 and A-2-7, use the partial group index for PI, or
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 3-17, p. 3-45.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
LT= LFC=
L=9.5 in. 14.5 in. 4.5 in.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-16, p. 4-35.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-17, p. 4-36.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-18, p. 4-36.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-19, p. 4-37.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-20, p. 4-38.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-21, p. 4-38.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
C N = =0.77 log10 d P nG
20
o
where
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Soil Properties Correlated with Standard Penetration Test Values (after Peck et alia, 1974)
Sands (Reliable) Silts and Clays (Unreliable)
N60 Relative Density N60 Consistency
0–4 Very loose Below 2 Very soft
5–10 Loose 2–4 Soft
11–30 Medium dense 5–8 Medium
31–50 Dense 9–15 Stiff
Over 50 Very dense 16–30 Very stiff
Over 30 Hard
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 3-9, p. 3-58.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-2, p. 4-5.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
VERTICAL EFFECTIVE
2
RELATIVE DENSITY
100 Dr, %
3 90
85
80
4 70
60
40 50
15
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
ENERGY CORRECTED SPT N-VALUE, N60
1 ksf = 47.9 kPa
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 5-1, p. 5-6.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 5-2, p. 5-7.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 5-3, p. 5-8 and 5-9.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
B
C
D
WATER
CONTENT, w
where
PI = plasticity index
PL = plastic limit
LL = liquid limit
LI = liquidity index
w = water content
Concept of Soil Phase, Soil Strength, and Soil Deformation Based on Liquidity Index
Liquidity
Soil Phase Soil Strength (Soil Deformation)
Index, LI
LI ≥ 1 Liquid Low strength
(Soil deforms like a viscous fluid.)
0 < LI < 1 Plastic Intermediate strength
Vv Vw Ww
WATER
V W
Vs SOLID Ws
1 UNIT
In above relationships, γw refers to the unit weight of water, 62.4 pcf (9.81 kN/m3).
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 2-2, p. 2-8.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
where
Gs = specific gravity
e = void ratio
n = porosity
S = saturation (ratio)
TOTAL d t sat
WEIGHT Wt WEIGHT
TOTAL V OF Ws
Vs VOLUME OF
VOLUME OF SOLIDS
OF SOLIDS SAMPLE
SAMPLE SOLIDS
SOIL
VOLUME COMPONENTS WEIGHT COMPONENTS
SAMPLE
Saturated Unsaturated
Sample Sample Supplementary Formulas Relating Measured and
Property
(Ws, Ww, G (Ws, Ww, G, V Computed Factors
are known) are known)
Vs (volume Ws V − `Va + Vw j V(1 – n)
V Vv
of solids) Gγ w 1+e e
Vw (volume Ww SVe
γw Vv – Va SVv 1+e SVse
of water)
Va (volume _1 − S i Ve
Zero V – (Vs + Vw) Vv – Vw (1 – S)Vv (1 – S)Vse
of air or gas) 1+e
Volume Vv (volume Ww Ws Vs n Ve
γw V− V – Vs
1−n 1+e Vse
Components of voids) Gγ w
V (total
volume of Vs + Vw Measured Vs + Va + Vw Vs Vs(1 + e) Vv _1 + e i
sample) 1−n e
Vv Vs Ws e
n (porosity) 1−V 1− 1+e
V GVγ w
e (void Vv V − GVγ w Ww G n wG
ratio) Vs Vs 1 Ws
−1
Ws S 1−n S
Ws (weight Wt Ww G
Measured GVgw(1 – n)
of solids) 1+w eS
Weights Ww (weight eWs S
for Specific Measured wWs SgwVv
of water) G
Sample Wt (total
weight of Ws + Ww Ws(1 + w)
sample
gd (dry unit Ws Ws Wt Gγ w Gγ w
weight Vs + Vw V V _1 + w i 1+e
1+
wG
S
gt (wet unit _G + Se i γ w _1 + w i γ w
Ws + Ww Ws + Ww Wt
weight) Vs + Vw V V 1+e w+1
Weights for S G
Sample of gsat _G + e i γ w _1 + w i γ w
Ws + Ww Ws + Vv γ w Ws
Unit Volume (saturated + c +e m γ w 1+e 1
unit weight) Vs + Vw V V 1 e w+
G
gsub JK N
[submerged KK 1 − 1 OOO
Ws GO
− c 1+ m γ w d G + e − 1 n γ w
gsat – gw KK γ
(buoyant) V 1 e 1+e KK w + 1 OOO w
K GO
unit weight] L P
w (moisture Ww Wt Se γw 1
Ws
−
Ws 1 G Seγ − o
content) d G
w
Combined S (degree of Vw Ww wG γw 1
1.00 e o
Relations saturation) Vv Vv γ w e γd − G
G (specific Ws Se
gravity) Vs γ w w
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Soil Mechanics. UFC 3-220-10N. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, June 2005, Table 6, p. 135-136.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_10n_2005.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 2-3, p. 2-10.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
65
60 UNIFORMLY GRADED
55 GAP GRADED
50
45
WELL GRADED
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL SAND
COBBLES SILT OR CLAY
COARSE FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
D60
Cu = D
10
D30 2
Cc = D # D
60 10
where
Cu = coefficient of uniformity
Cc = coefficient of curvature
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 4-10, p. 4-19.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
ML
D SP
SM AN
IS R ANGE
25% ′ OBTAIN FROM
30 IN T H
EFFECTIVE STRESS
FAILURE ENVELOPES.
0 APPROXIMATE
CORRELATION IS FOR
COHESIONLESS
25 MATERIALS WITHOUT
PLASTIC FINES.
20
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
DRY UNIT WEIGHT D (pcf)
Correlation Between Relative Density, Material Classification, and Angle of Internal Friction
for Coarse-Grained Soils (NAVFAC, 1986a)
Note: Use caution in the shaded portion of the chart due to the potential for unreliable SPT N-values in gravels.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 5-22, p. 5-57.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
UPPER
OVER- RESERVOIR
FLOW
DRAIN
PIEZOMETERS
WATER
INLET
VALVE
SOIL
LOWER
RESERVOIR
Q
VALVE
GRADUATED
CYLINDER
QL
k=
tAh
where
k = coefficient of permeability
Q = volume of flow
L = length of sample
t = time of flow
CROSS-SECTIONAL
AREA = a
WATER LEVEL
AT BEGINNING
OF TEST
STANDPIPE
∆h0
WATER LEVEL ∆h
AT END OF TEST
∆h1
CROSS-SECTIONAL
AREA = A
GRADUATED
CYLINDER
SOIL L
DRAIN HOLES
h1
ln e o
aL
k=
A _t1 t 2 i
− h 2
where
k = coefficient of permeability
L = length of sample
h1 = hydraulic head at t1
h2 = hydraulic head at t2
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 3-2, p. 3-3.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf.
where
k = permeability (cm/s)
e o po pc ARITHMETIC
PRESSURE-VOID RATIO CURVE
p
p
e
e ov = e
a
(NATURAL SCALE) p
VOID RATIO (e)
er
ef
“UNDISTURBED” SAMPLE
DISTURBED SAMPLE
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
PRESSURE (NATURAL SCALE)
eo po pc SEMILOG
PRESSURE-VOID RATIO CURVE
A
ppcc- PRE-CONSOLIDATION D
PRESSURE B
1 - LOG CYCLE
ppoo- OVERBURDEN CR
(NATURAL SCALE)
PRESSURE C
VOID RATIO (e)
Cs
er
1 - LOG CYCLE
ef “UNDISTURBED”
SAMPLE
FOR
FOR LOAD
LOAD 1.0d
COMPRESSION
1.0
1.0d
“UNDISTURBED” p
p
SAMPLE 0.5
0.5d
0.5d 22H
H (INITIAL
HEIGHT)
HEIGHT)
t50
cvv = ______
0.197
0.19
0.197h 7h2
C
PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION tt50
50
1.0d
1.
1.00d
SECONDARY
SECONDARYCONSOLIDATION
COMPRESSION C(2H)
(2 H )
t100
1 - LOG CYCLE
d0 R S
x
x
P
Q
d0 + d100 V
DIAL READING
PRIMARY
CONSOLIDATION
d100
T
SECONDARY
t100 COMPRESSION
t1 t2 = 4t1 t50
TIME (LOG SCALE)
0.197 H d2
cv = t50
where
DIAL READING
OR = (1.15)(OQ)
0 Q R
TIME
t90
0.848 H d2
cv = t90
where
RE
LO
AD
IN
G
(ft2 / day)
(L
VI
G
OW
0.1
R
IN
10–7
ER
CO
RE M
BO
M PR U
OL ND
DE ESS )
D IO
SO N
IL
(UP
PE
RB
OUN 0.01
10–8 D)
40 80 120 160
LIQUID LIMIT (%)
t = time
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Equation 5-7, p. 5-37.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
INCREASE
MAX. DRY DENSITY
ZE
OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT
COMPACTION
RO
CURVE
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
IRA
V
OI
DS
CU
RV
E
WATER CONTENT (%) INCREASE
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual.
Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Table 5-13, p. 5-73.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
ZERO
AIR VOIDS
DRY UNIT WEIGHT (DENSITY), d (lb/ft3)
LINE OF
OPTIMUMS
(B) MODIFIED
PROCTOR
(A) STANDARD
PROCTOR
w = water content
Gs = specific gravity
e = void ratio
where
gd max = maximum dry unit weight from laboratory test (standard or modified Proctor)
100
95 At Dr = 0%, e = emax
90
85
At Dr = 100%, e = emin
80
75 MODIFIED
RELATIVE DENSITY, Dr (%)
70 PROCTOR
65
60
55
50
45 STANDARD
40 PROCTOR
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
75 80 85 90 95 100 105
101 101
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
95 95
REJECT RETEST REJECT REJECT REJECT REJECT
93 93
REJECT
91 91
–6 –4 –2 0 +2 +4 +6 –6 –4 –2 0 +2 +4 +6
PERCENT OF VARIATION OF BACKFILL WATER CONTENT FROM OPTIMUM
A. USE FOR AN INITIAL TEST OF BACKFILL AT B. USE FOR RETEST OF BACKFILL AT
RANDOM LOCATION RANDOM LOCATION
NOTE: 95 = SPECIFIED MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE PERCENT
OF CE 55 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
LABORATORY CURVE
d max
FOR SETTING FILL
N M
SPECIFICATIONS
B R S Y
X P Q
1
2
d AT
3 MINIMUM COMPACTION ENERGY
RC=90%
a OMC b c
COMPACTION MOISTURE CONTENT, w (%)
Compactors Recommended for Various Types of Soil and Rock (Schroeder, 1980)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Soils and Foundations, Reference Manual. Vol. I. FHWA-NHI-06-088.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, December 2006, Fig. 5-32, p. 5-77.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi06088.pdf.
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Backfill for Subsurface Structures. UFC 3-220-04FA. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, January 2004, Table 5-1, p. 5-3.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_04fa_2004.pdf.
A. Stable Rock is natural solid mineral matter than can be excavated with vertical sides and remain intact while exposed.
It is usually identified by a rock name such as granite or sandstone. Determining whether a deposit is of this type may be
difficult unless it is known whether cracks exist and whether the cracks run into or away from the excavation.
B. Type A Soils are cohesive soils with an unconfined compressive strength of 1.5 tons per square foot (tsf) (144 kPa) or
greater. Examples of Type A cohesive soils are often: clay, silty clay, sandy clay, clay loam, and, in some cases, silty clay
loam and sandy clay loam. (No soil is Type A if it is fissured, is subject to vibration of any type, has previously been
disturbed, is part of a sloped, layered system where the layers dip into the excavation on a slope of 4 horizontal to 1
vertical (4H:1V) or greater, or has seeping water.
C. Type B Soils are cohesive soils with an unconfined compressive strength greater than 0.5 tsf (48 kPa) but less than
1.5 tsf (144 kPa). Examples of other Type B soils are: angular gravel, silt, silt loam, previously disturbed soils unless
otherwise classified as Type C, soils that meet the unconfined compressive strength or cementation requirements of Type
A soils but are fissured or subject to vibration, dry unstable rock, and layered systems sloping into the trench at a slope less
than 4H:1V (only if the material would be classified as a Type B soil).
D. Type C Soils are cohesive soils with an unconfined compressive strength of 0.5 tsf (48 kPa) or less. Other Type C soils
include granular soils such as gravel, sand and loamy sand, submerged soil, soil from which water is freely seeping, and
submerged rock that is not stable. Also included in this classification is material in a sloped, layered system where the layers
dip into the excavation or have a slope of four horizontal to one vertical (4H:1V) or greater.
E. Layered Geological Strata. Where soils are configured in layers, i.e., where a layered geological structure exists,
the soil must be classified on the basis of the soil classification of the weakest soil layer. Each layer may be classified
individually if a more stable layer lies below a less stable layer, i.e., where a Type C soil rests on top of stable rock.
Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Technical Manual (OTM). TED 01-00-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Sec. V, Ch. 2.
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_v/otm_v_2.html#4.
TYPE A SOIL
SUPPORTED OR SHIELDED
VERTICALLY SIDED LOWER PORTION
SUPPORT OR 1
SHIELD SYSTEM
20' MAXIMUM 3/4
18" MINIMUM
TYPE B SOIL
SUPPORTED OR SHIELDED
VERTICALLY SIDED LOWER PORTION
SUPPORT OR 1
SHIELD SYSTEM
20' MAXIMUM 1
18" MINIMUM
TYPE C SOIL
SUPPORTED OR SHIELDED
VERTICALLY SIDED LOWER PORTION
SUPPORT OR 1
SHIELD SYSTEM
20' MAXIMUM 1 1/2
18" MINIMUM
Allowable Slopes
Soil Type Height: Depth Ratio Slope Angle
Stable Rock Vertical 90°
Type A 3/4:1 53°
Type B 1:1 45°
Type C 1 1/2:1 34°
Type A (short-term)* 1/2:1 63°
*For a maximum excavation depth of 12 ft for short-term conditions
Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Technical Manual (OTM). TED 01-00-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Sec. V, Ch. 2, Table V:2.
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_v/otm_v_2.html#4.
This figure illustrates the different types of slope excavations in layered soils. This includes Type A, B, and C soils
in single-slope excavations, and different permutations such as Type A soil over Types B and C individually,
Type B soil over Types A and C individually, and Type C soil over Types A and B individually.
Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Technical Manual (OTM). TED 01-00-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Sec. V, Ch. 2, Fig. V:2-13.
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_v/otm_v_2.html#4.
1
1 3/4
1 8' MAXIMUM
12' MAXIMUM
3 1/2' MAXIMUM
3 1/2' MAXIMUM
5' MAXIMUM
20' MAXIMUM
20' MAXIMUM
1 1
3/4 3/4
TYPE A SOIL
SIMPLE SLOPE - SHORT TERM
12' MAXIMUM 1
1/2
This figure illustrates the types of excavations made in Type A soil: Two types use an unsupported, vertically sided,
lower portion (with maximum depths of 8 feet and 12 feet), and the other three types are single bench excavation,
multiple bench excavation, and simple slope–short-term excavation.
Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA CFR Part 1926 Subpart P, App. B, Sloping and Benching, Fig. B-1.1
http://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926SubpartPAppB.
4' MAXIMUM
20' MAXIMUM 20' MAXIMUM 1
1
1 1
This figure illustrates two types of excavations made in Type B soil that are permitted
in cohesive soil only: single-bench excavation and multiple-bench excavation
Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Technical Manual (OTM). TED 01-00-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Sec. V, Ch. 2, Fig. V:2-15.
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/otm_v/otm_v_2.html#4.
No freezing problems
No freezing problems
Easy to read
Can be used to read negative pore water Need for lightning protection should be
pressures evaluated
No freezing problems
a Diaphragm piezometer readings indicate the head above the piezometer and the elevation of the piezometer must be measured or estimated if
piezometric elevation is required. All diaphragm piezometers, except those provided with a vent to the atmosphere, are sensitive to barometric
pressure change. If piezometer pipes, tubes, or cables are carried up through fill, there will be significant interruption to construction and the
probability of inferior compaction of the fill around the piezometer pipe.
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Instrumentation of Embankment Dams and Levees.
EM 1110-2-1908. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, June 1995, Table 4-1, p. 4-8.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1908.pdf.
g
Surveying Methods
Optical and other methods
Benchmarks ● ● ● ●
Horizontal control stations
Surface measuring points
Probe Extensometers
Mechanical probe gauges
Electrical probe gauges ● ● ● ●
Combined probe extensometers and
inclinometer casings
Fixed Embankment Extensometers
Settlement platforms
Burled plates ● ● ● ●
Gauges with electrical linear displacement
transducers
Subsurface Settlement Points ● ●
Fixed Borehole Extensometers
Single-point extensometers ● ● ● ●
Multipoint extensometers
Inclinometers
Probe inclinometers ● ● ● ● ●
In-place inclinometers
Liquid Level Gauges
Single-point gauges ● ●
Full-profile gauges
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Instrumentation of Embankment Dams and Levees.
EM 1110-2-1908. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, June 1995, Table 4-2, p. 4-10.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1908.pdf.
3.12.2 Grouting
Physical Properties of Chemical Grouts
Unconfined
Viscosity Gel Time Range
Class Example Compressive
(centipoise) (min.)
Strength (psi)
Precipitated grouts:
Silicate (low concentration) Silicate-bicarbonate 1.5 0.1–300 Under 50
Silicate (high concentration) Silicate-formamide (Siroc)a 4–40 5–300 Over 500
Silicate-chloride (Joosten) 30–50 0 Over 500
Chrome lignin TDM 2.5–4 5–120 50 to 500
Terra Firmab 2–5 10–300 Under 50
Blox-Allc 8 3–90 Under 50
Lignosold 50 10–1000 –
Polymerized grouts:
Vinyl polymer AM-9e 1.2–1.6 0.1–1000 50 to 500
Methylol bridge polymer Urea formaldehyde 6 5–300 Over 500
Herculoxc 13 4–60 Over 500
Cyanaloc 62e 13 1–60 Over 500
Resorcinol-formaldehyde 3–5 – Over 500
Oil-based unsaturated fatty-acid
polymers Polythixon FRD 10–80 25–360 Over 500
Epoxy resin 62E2f 2–18 – Over 500
a Diamond Alkali Company d Lignosol Chemical, Ltd.
b Intrusion Prepakt, Inc. e American Cyanamid Company
c Halliburton Company f George W. Whitesides Company
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Grouting Methods and Equipment. UFC 3-220-06. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, January 2004, Table 1, p. 18.
https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_06_2004.pdf.
150
140
130 RULE OF THUMB
120
DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE (ft)
110 SOUND
STRATIFIED ROCK
100
90
80
70
60
MASSIVE ROCK
50
40
SOUND STRATIFIED ROCK
30
GROUTED ABOVE GIVEN DEPTH
20
10
0
1 10 25 50 75 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
20
15
SACKS OF CEMENT
6
0.
=
c
w/ 8
0.
10 1.0
5
11..22
1.5
2.0
2.5
5 3.0
A 3.5
4.0
5.0
6.0
0
0 5 10 15 20
GROUT VOLUME (ft3)
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Grouting Methods and Equipment. UFC 3-220-06.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 5, p. 28.
https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_06_2004.pdf.
3.12.3 Vibrocompaction
3/4" #4 #20 #60 GRAIN SIZE
U.S. SIEVES
2" 3/8" #10 #50 #200
100
90
80
70
% PASSING BY WEIGHT
60
50
A
A B
B C D
D
40
30
20
10
90 10
60 40
ZONE 1
50 PERVIOUS SOILS 50
PLASICITY INDEX (PI) = 0
40 PERMEABILITY GREATER 60
THAN 1x10–5 m/sec
30 ZONE 2
70
SEMI–PERVIOUS
20 SOILS 0 < PI < 8 80
PERMEABILITY IN
10
THE RANGE OF 90
1x10–5 m/sec
TO 1x10–8 m/sec
100
0
5 mm 0.5 mm 0.074 mm 0.005 mm 0.001 mm
SAND
SILT OR CLAY
COARSE MEDIUM FINE
3.13 Geosynthetics
3.13.1 Types of Geosynthetics
0.5
NO EFFECT
STRETCHED GEOGRIDS
REDUCTION FACTOR
STRETCHED
EXTRUDED GEOGRIDS
0.2
WOVEN
GEOTEXTILES
0.1
NONWOVEN
GEOTEXTILES
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
SUBGRADE CBR
Reduction of Roadway Base Course Thickness Using Various Geosynthetics (after van Gurp and van Leest)
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 3.10, p. 410.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
The following are the most commonly used polymers in the manufacturing of geosynthetics:
PLASTIC SOIL
LESS THAN 20% CLAY (PI > 5)
AND MORE THAN 10% FINES
(d20 > 0.002 mm, AND
FROM SOIL d10 < 0.075 mm) NONPLASTIC SOIL
PROPERTY (PI < 5)
TESTS
9
O95 < d'
STABLE USE STRAIGHT LINE THROUGH Loose C'u 50
SOIL d60 AND d30 TO OBTAIN C'u
APPLICATION WIDELY (lD < 35%)
O95 < 13.5 d'50
FAVORS (1 < Cc < 3) GRADED Medium C'u
RETENTION USE STRAIGHT LINE
LESS THAN 10% FINES C'u > 3 (35% < lD < 65%)
THROUGH d30 AND O95 < 18 d'50
AND LESS THAN UNSTABLE Dense C'u
SOIL d10 TO OBTAIN C'u
90% GRAVEL (lD > 65%)
( Cc > 3 or Cc < 1 ) O95 < C' d'50
(d10 > 0.075 mm, AND Loose u
d10 < 4.8 mm) APPLICATION UNIFORMLY (lD < 35%)
FAVORS USE STRAIGHT LINE DRAWN O95 < 1.5C' d'50
GRADED Medium
PERMEABILITY TANGENT AT d50 TO OBTAIN C'u u
C'u < 3 (35% < lD < 65%)
More than 90% of gravel O95 < 2C'u d'50
Dense
(d10 > 4.8 mm)
(lD > 65%)
Notes:
Soil Retention Criteria for Geotextile Filter Design Using Steady-State Flow Conditions (after Luettich et alia)
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 2.4a, p. 111.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
where
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Table 3.2, p. 401.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
where
RFIN = reduction factor for adjacent materials intruding into the geotextile's void space (≥ 1.0)
Recommended Flow-Reduction Factor Values for Use in Allowable Flow Rates Equation
Range of Reduction Factors
Application Clogging and Creep Reduction Intrusion into Chemical Biological
Binding* of Voids Voids Clogging** Clogging***
Retaining wall filters 2.0 to 4.0 1.5 to 2.0 1.0 to 1.2 1.0 to 1.2 1.0 to 1.3
Underdrain filters 2.0 to 10 1.0 to 1.5 1.0 to 1.2 1.2 to 1.5 2.0 to 4.0***
Erosion control filters 2.0 to 10 1.0 to 1.5 1.0 to 1.2 1.0 to 1.2 2.0 to 4.0
Landfill filters 2.0 to 10 1.5 to 2.0 1.0 to 1.2 1.2 to 1.5 2.0 to 5.0***
Gravity drainage 2.0 to 4.0 2.0 to 3.0 1.0 to 1.2 1.2 to 1.5 1.2 to 1.5
Pressure drainage 2.0 to 3.0 2.0 to 3.0 1.0 to 1.2 1.1 to 1.3 1.1 to 1.3
* If stone riprap or concrete blocks cover the surface of the geotextile, use either the upper values or include an addition for
reduction factor.
** Values can be higher, particularly for high alkalinity groundwater.
***Values can be higher for extremely high microorganism content and/or growth of organisms and plant/vegetation roots.
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Table 2.8b, p. 176.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
σ hq = Ka q
x2Z
σ hl = P
R5
σ h = σ hs + σ hq + σ hl
Tallow
σ h Sv =
FS
Tallow
Sv =
σ h FS
L = Le + L R
L R = ^ H − Z h tan d 45 − n
φ
2
S v σ h FS
Le =
2 `ca + γZ tan δ j
S v σ h FS
Lo =
4 `ca + γZ tan δ j
where
P = concentrated load
FS = factor of safety
P1 P2 (LIVE LOADS)
SURCHARGE D
Z
LR LE σhs σhq σhl σh
H
+ + =
Sv
(45 + φ/ 2)
Sv
Le
where
R = radius of failure
Ni, N i = total and effective normal force at the base of the slice
n = number of slices
O (x,y)
n -1 n
ym
R y2
i y1
TOE OF
SLOPE Tm
(0,0) T2
T1
1 2 3 θi
SLICE i
θi θi
Wi sin
Wi
i
W
co
s
θi
C N
F φ
Details of Circular Arc Slope Stability Analysis for (c, f) Shear Strength Soils
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 2.38, p. 233.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
CHART 1
STEEP REINFORCED SLOPE DESIGN CHARTS u
ru 0.0
z
1.4 1.4
1.2 LR 1.2
LR H ds
1.0
H ovrl ′d 1.0
Steep, Reinforced, Soil-Slope Design Charts for Zero-Pore Water Pressure (after Jewell)
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 3.15, p. 418.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
where
LR = length of reinforcement
H = height of slope
Treqd = K γz H
where
γz = unit weight of soil
φd = angle of internal friction
ACTIVE
WEDGE
h
L WA
PASSIVE
Ca
WEDGE
WP GEOMEMBRANE
tan
EP NA
EA NA
C NP tan
Np
L h
WA
PASSIVE T
WEDGE
WP
EP
Ca GEOMEMBRANE
EA
tan
NA
C Np tan NA
Np
Limit Equilibrium Forces Involved in a Finite Length Slope Analysis for a Uniformly Thick Cover Soil
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 1. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 3.24, p. 444.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
where
Ca = adhesive force between cover soil of the active wedge and the geomembrane
EA = interwedge force acting on the active wedge from the passive wedge
EP = interwedge force acting on the passive wedge from the active wedge
PVC
Rough 27° (0.88) – – 25° (0.96)
Smooth 25° (0.81) – – 21° (0.79)
*Efficiency values (in parentheses) are based on the relationship E = tan ä/tan f.
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 2. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Table 5.6, p. 540.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
3.13.6 Geofoam
EPSXX = number designation for expanded polystyrene geofoam type(s) having a minimum density of XX kg/m3
XPSXX = number designation for extruded polystyrene geofoam type(s) having a minimum density of XX kg/m3
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 2. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Table 7.1, p. 810.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute. And ASTM D6817/D6817M-13a: Standard Specification for Rigid Cellular Polystyrene
Geofoam. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, May 2013.
ENTRANCE
SEEPAGE LINES
TANGENT TO
90°
FACE
HORIZONTAL
90° 90° 90°
CONDITIONS FOR POINT OF ENTRANCE
DISCHARGE FACE
TANGENT TO VERTICAL OF
SEEPAGE LINE DISCHARGE POINT
TANGENT TO
DISCHARGE FACE
90° 90° 90° 180°
CONDITIONS FOR POINT OF DISCHARGE
k2 k1
k2
k2 k1 k1
0 270°
SHADED AREAS REPRESENT SOIL
WITH LOWER PERMEABILITY COEFFICIENT k1
VERTICAL
k1 k2 k2 (VERY PERVIOUS
COMPARED TO )k1
(APPROACHES k1 ) k1 ZONE OF PARTIAL
SATURATION
270° USUAL CASE
PARALLEL
B1 3 2 1 T
TO AXIS
3
PARABOLA 2
1
DIRECTION OF AXIS C
OF PARABOLA
b
SEEPAGE LINE GRAPHIC
(PHREATIC SURFACE) CONSTRUCTION
OF PARABOLA
PARABOLA
B1 B T
C
h b a
0.3b
d A
a Q = ka sin 2
Determination of Seepage Line for Homogeneous Section on Impervious Foundation a < 60°
1. Transform the section as in Transformation Method figure, if necessary (see following page).
2. Locate point B1. BB1 = 0.3b .
3. Locate discharge point C from equation:
Source: Bureau of Reclamation. Reclamation: Managing Water in the West. Design Standards No. 13: Embankment Dams. Chapter 8: Seepage.
Phase 4 (Final). DS-13(8)-4.1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior, January 2014. Figure 8.4.4.1-2, p. 8-51.
https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/designstandards-datacollectionguides/finalds-pdfs/DS13-8.pdf.
2
1
kh = 4kv k h = 9k v
b c
TRANSFORMED SECTION
* HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS REDUCED BY kv
kh
k h = 4k v
b TRANSPOSED TO TRUE SECTION
k h = 9k v
c TRANSPOSED TO TRUE SECTION
a=l
3
h1 10
F 2
III = 0.65 2
0.65l
A 90° l 1 ROCK FILL 1
VERY PERVIOUS, k ∞ 40
D TAILWATER ELEVATION
IMPERVIOUS BOUNDARY, N f = 2.65 FLOW CHANNELS DISCHARGE FACE
ZERO POTENTIAL LINE
LOWEST FLOW LINE (BOUNDARY)
Computations:
Nf 3
= Q kh = 0 . 0005 # 40 # 2.65 = 0.0059 ft per foot of embankment
Np 9 min
2. Hydrostatic pressure at any point:
np
= h1 N = h, where n p number of potential drops between point and zero potential.
p
= 6#
At point E, h1 9= 40 ft 26.7 ft
= 5#
At point s F and G, h1 9= 40 ft 22.2 ft
h1 can also be deter mined graphically.
kf o
1
1 2 3 5 kh kv
h 4 6 7
ke
2 Nf 8 9
10 N p Q k e h 2 0.2 k e h
10
IMPERVIOUS a TAIL WATER ELEV.
1 2 3
4
5
1 6
7 kf ke
2 8 9
10 N p kh kv
3
4 Q k e h 4.9 0.5 k e h
10
4.9 N f
1 2 k f 5k e
3 4
56° 5 6 kh kv
1 7
8
2 9 10 N
p Q k e h 15
10 1.5 k e h
k f 5k e
k h 4k v
1
3
2 Q kh 23.5
10
2.35 kh
4 10 N p
5
k e PERM. COEF. OF EMBANKMENT
10
15 k f PERM. COEF. OF FOUNDATION
d k kv kh
3.15 Landfills
GEOCOMPOSITE
DRAIN
GEOTEXTILE GEOSYNTHETIC EROSION
CONTROL SYSTEM
FILTER
GEOGRID / GEOTEXTILE GEOGRID / GEOTEXTILE
REINFORCEMENT REINFORCEMENT
GEOSYNTHETIC EROSION GEOTEXTILE
CONTROL SYSTEM
GEOCOMPOSITE / GEONET
GEOMEMBRANE
R SOIL GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER
COVE GEOMEMBRANE GEOTEXTILE
GEOTEXTILE
GEOSYNTHETIC GAS VENT
GEOPIPE OR CLAY LINER
GEOCOMPOSITE
DRAIN
GEOTEXTILE SOLID
FILTER WASTE
GEOTEXTILE
GEONET
FILTER GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER
GEONET PRIMARY GEOMEMBRANE GEOTEXTILE FILTER
GEOGRID GRAVEL WITH PERFORATED PIPE
GEOTEXTILE FILTER GEOPIPE
REINFORCEMENT SECONDARY GEOTEXTILE PROTECTION
GEOMEMBRANE GEOMEMBRANE (PRIMARY)
GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER
GEOTEXTILE FILTER / SEPARATOR
COMPACTED CLAY LINER GEOCOMPOSITE / GEONET DRAIN
GEOMEMBRANE (SECONDARY)
Solid-Waste Containment System with High Geosynthetic Utilization
Source: Koerner, Robert M. Designing with Geosynthetics. Vol. 2. 6th ed. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris, 2012, Fig. 5.35, p. 663.
Used with permission of the Geosynthetic Institute.
GEOMEMBRANE
GEOTEXTILE
GEONET
COMPOSITE
CCL OR GCL
CRITICAL
INTERFACE
SOLID
WASTE
ANCHOR LEACHATE
TRENCH REMOVAL PIPE
TO PUMP STATION
OR STORAGE TANK
PREFABRICATED
HDPE SUMP
FILL WITH SPECIFIED GRAVEL
(A) LEACHATE REMOVAL BY GRAVITY FLOW FROM BOTTOM OF SUMP
300 mm
600 mm HDPE CONCRETE
SOLID RISER IN 3 m PAD SOLID
4 mm
WASTE SECTIONS HDPE WASTE
PAD
GEOTEXTILE GRAVEL GEONET
0.5 TO 1.0 m
SIDEWALL RISER
SOLID (≈ 600 mm DIA.)
WASTE
GEOMEMBRANE GEOTEXTILE
REMOVAL AND
(RUBSHEET) MONITORING
SHED
300 mm
PERFORATED
GEOTEXTILE
5 TO 10 m T-SECTION
GEOMEMBRANE WITHIN GRAVEL
(PRIMARY)
(C) LEACHATE REMOVAL BY A SIDEWALL RISER
FROM SUMP IN SHED
NORMAL STRESS, σn
β
∆H T
N,
IO MOBILIZATION DISTANCE, x
NS
TE
σn
FUσ
β FLσ FLT
Tcos β
2Tsin β
x
T Tsin β
x
FUs = shear force above geomembrane due to applied soil pressure (does not occur for liquid or thin soil covers)
FLs = shear force below geomembrane due to the overlying liquid pressure (and soil if applicable)
d = angle of shearing resistance between geomembrane and the adjacent material (i.e., soil or geotextile)
dU = 0° for liquid containment and 10° to 40° for landfill containment (determined from laboratory tests)
where
Q = rate of flow
k = permeability
A = cross-sectional area
PA h
w OVERFLOW
A
PB
FL w
OW
hA
S
ZA B
hB
HEAD ZB
POINT TOTAL PRESSURE ELEVATION
A hA PA w ZA
B hB PB w ZB
ARBITRARY DATUM (Z = 0)
Darcy’s Law for Flow Through Inclined Soil Column (prepared by WES, modified by NCEES)
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams. EM 1110-2-1901.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, 30 September 1986 (Original), 30 April 1993 (Change 1), Fig. 2-1, p. 2-2.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1901.pdf?ver=2013-09-04-072923-387.
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, January 2004, Table 3-4, p. 3-6.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf.
OVERFLOW
A D
FLOW
A
2
πD
AREA =
4
ACTUAL FLOW PATH
IN PORE SPACES
L L = LENGTH OF STRUCTURE
h
h1 h2
dz
dx
FLOW
a. HYDRAULIC STRUCTURE
h dz
z
h dx
x
vz + vz
dz
dz z
vx
vx + vx
vz dx
x
dx
b. ELEMENT OF SOIL
Flow of Water Through Saturated Pervious Soil Beneath a Hydraulic Structure (courtesy of John Wiley and Sons)
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams. EM 1110-2-1901. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Army, 30 September 1986 (Original), 30 April 1993 (Change 1), Fig. 4-2, p. 4-5.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1901.pdf?ver=2013-09-04-072923-387.
HEADWATER
SHEET
PILE
Nf = 4
Nd = 8
TAILWATER
A B D E
1 8
4
3
2 7
C
3 4 5 6
1
F G
Nd = 5
N f = 1.2
k1
60 ft
h = 16 ft
A h = h0 B C h=0 D
3
H
BGHC 1
h1 G
=
h
50 ft
h2
h3
2 EF F
E
Gravity Dam on Pervious Foundation of Finite Depth (courtesy McGraw-Hill Book Company)
Source: Harr, M. E. Groundwater and Seepage. McGraw-Hill, 1962. As found in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Engineering and Design: Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams. EM 1110-2-1901. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army,
30 September 1986 (Original), 30 April 1993 (Change 1), Fig. 5-2, p. 5-3.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1901.pdf?ver=2013-09-04-072923-392.
Q = rate of flow
k = permeability
SAND
IMPERVIOUS STRATUM
Drainage of an Open Deep Cut by Means of a Multistage Well Point System
Source: Terzaghi, K., and R. B. Peck. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Wiley and Sons, 1948. As found in Unified Facilities Criteria
(UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 2-4, p. 2-4.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf.
CL EXCAVATION
CONSTRUCTION
PIEZOMETER
WELL
SAND
TURBINE PUMP
where
G is equal to the ratio of flow from a partially penetrating well, Qwp , to that for a fully penetrating well for the same
drawdown, H − hw, at the periphery of the wells. Approximate values of G can be computed from the formula:
G = D b1 + 7 rw /2W cos 2 l
W πW/D
W
D
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 4-10, p. 4-11. www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf.
OT CE
SL UR
SO
∞
∞ H
US
VIO
P ER
IM D
US
VIO
P ER
he
h Q
US
VIO
P ER
IM x
y
L
Artesian Flow: Q = L ` H − he j
kDx
∞ ∞ H
US
hs VIO
PER
he h
ho
US
VIO
ER
IMP
x
y
L
kx ` 2 − 2 j
Gravity Flow: Q =
2L H h 0
Drawdown: At any distance y from slot
L−y
H 2 − h 2 = L ` H 2 − h e2 j
where
he = h0 + hs
(hs is obtained from the following figure, "Height of Free Discharge Surface h; Gravity Flow")
Source for above figures and equations: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 4-1, p. 4-2.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf.
1.2
1.0
hs
0.8
h H
Q
ho
y
hs L
0.6
H
0.4
h
o
H =
0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5
L
H
3.16.5.5 Filters
D15 # d
40 − A n
3 Silty and clayey sands and gravels; 15 to 39 percent finer 40 − 15
9_4 # d85 i − 0.7 mmC + 0.7 mm d, e
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Design and Construction of Levees. EM 1110-2-1913.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, April 2000, Table D-3, p. D-3.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1913.pdf.
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Engineering and Design: Design and Construction of Levees. EM 1110-2-1913.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, April 2000, p. D-4.
www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1913.pdf.
SILT
SAND
GROUT
CURTAIN OR
CUTOFF
TRENCH
CLAY OR SHALE
GROUT CURTAIN
OR CUTOFF TRENCH SUBMERSIBLE
PUMP
Grout Curtain or Cutoff Trench Around an Excavation
Source: Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC). Dewatering and Groundwater Control. UFC 3-220-05. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Defense, January 2004, Fig. 2-11, p. 2-10.
www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_220_05_2004.pdf
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Corrosion/Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes. FHWA-NHI-09-087. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Transportation, November 2009, Table 2-3, p. 2-14.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/nhi09087/nhi09087.pdf.
RESISTIVITY (Ω·cm)
100000
10000
THEORETICAL
LOIRE SAND
FONTAIN. SAND
SEA WATER FILL
SO 4
1000
CI
100
10 100 1000 10000
SALT CONTENT (ppm)
t = time (years)
STEEL PILE
HWL SPLASH ZONE 0.0035 in./year, 95% MAXIMUM PROBABLE = 0.0071 in./year
SEA BED
Loss of Thickness by Corrosion for Steel Piles in Seawater (after Morley and Bruce 1983)
Source: Federal Highway Administration, National Highway Institute. Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations, Volume I.
FHWA-NHI-16-009. FHWA GEC 012 - Volume I. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, July 2016, Figure 6-29, p. 193.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/gec12/nhi16009_v1.pdf.
C
D
CLAYEY LEAN
MEDIUM SANDY SANDS CLAYS
A CLAYEY CL-OL
GRAVEL B GRAVELS
GP GC
SM-SC
SM– SC
SILTY GRAVELS AND SC
AND-SC
LOW
GW-GM, GP-GM,
AND GM
1.0
VERY
LOW CLEAN GRAVELLY AND FAT
SANDS SANDY CLAYS CLAY
CL CH
SP
3 3
1281 kg/m (80 lb/ft )
SW–SM,
SW-SM, 0.30
SP– SM,
SP-SM, 1602 kg/m (100 lb/ft3)
3
NEGLIGIBLE and SM 0.24
mm/day
SANDY
1922 kg/m3(120 lb/ft3)
*
GRAVELS
GW 3 3
0.17
2242 kg/m (140 lb/ft )
0.1 0.10
0.4 1 10 100
PERCENTAGE BY MASS FINER THAN 0.02 mm
*SPECIMEN
INDICATED HEAVE RATE DUE TO EXPANSION IN VOLUME IF ALL ORIGINAL WATER IN 100% SATURATED
* Indicated heave rate due
WAS FROZEN,WITH to expansion
RATE OF FROST in PENETRATION
volume if all original
6.35 MMwater in -100-percent-saturated
(0.25 INCHES) PER DAY.
specimen was frozen, with rate of frost penetration 6.35 mm (0.25 in.) per day
TYPE C: POST-GROUTED
TYPE D: UNDER-REAMED
ACTIVE ZONE
LOADING WALL
ACTIVE ZONE
LOADING WALL
MINIMUM
DISTANCE FROM
WALL TO START
OF ANCHOR ENVELOPE OF DEEPEST POINTS
BOND LENGTH OF POTENTIAL FAILURE
MECHANISMS WHICH REQUIRE
SOME ANCHOR FORCE FOR
STABILITY
Typical Factors Influencing Bond Stress Transfer for Small Diameter Ground Anchors
Soil Type
Factor
Cohesionless Cohesive
Soil Properties Friction angle and grain size distribution Adhesion and plasticity index
Driven casing increases normal stress and Drilling without casing or with fluids decreases
Drilling Method
friction capacity
Steady increase in anchor capacity to 6 m Steady increase in anchor capacity for soils with
Bond Length
with moderating increases to 12 m undrained strength less than 96 kPa
Hole Diameter Slight increase in anchor capacity to 100 mm Anchor capacity increases to 300 mm.
Anchor capacity increases with increasing Anchor capacity increases only with stage grouting.
Grout Pressure
pressure High initial pressures should be avoided.
Note: To ensure ground-grout bond, the drill hole should be cleaned and the grout placed as quickly as possible after the hole has been drilled.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems.
FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 3, p. 30.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
H1 A H1 A
T1 B T1 B
H2 H2
H p p
R C R C
H1 H1
T1 T1 B F
H2 H2
C G T2u
T2 T2
p H T2L
H H p
Hn Hn
D I Tnu
Tn Tn
J TnL
Hn+1 Hn+1 K
R R
E
H2
T1 = Load over length H1 + 2 T1 calculated from / MC = 0
H2 H n
T2 = Load over length 2 + 2 T2u = Total earth pressure (ABCGF) − T1
Hn Hn + 1
Tn = Load over length 2 + 2 T2L calculated from / M D = 0
Hn + 1
R = Load over length 2 Tnu = Total earth pressure (CDIH) − T2L
A A
H1 H1
T1 B MB F
T1 B
MB H2 MBC
C G T2u
p T2
H2 H T2L
H H p
Hn
MCD
Tn D I Tnu
MBC
J TnL
K
Hn1 MDE
R C R E
MB = RMB MB = RMB
(a) Walls with one level of ground anchors (b) Walls with multiple levels of ground anchors
13
H1 A MB = 54 H12 p
^23H 2 − 10HH1h
T1 = p
T1 B 54 ^ H − H1h
MB
2
R = 3 Hp − T1
p
Solve for point of zero shear
H H2
x = 9 ^26H 2 − 52HH1h
1
MBC
px3
MBC = Rx −
4 ^ H − H1h
C
R
13
MB = 54 H12 p
A
H1
T1 = b 32 H1 + 22 l p
H
T1 B MB
T2 = b 22 + 2n l p
H H
H2
Tn = b 2n + 48n + 1 l p
T2 MBC H 23H
C
R = b 16 Hn+1 l p
H Hn MC 3
Tn MCD
D
MD Maximum moment below B = pL2 /10
Hn1
where L is the larger of H2, Hn, Hn + 1
MDE
R E
1.5 b
D D D
Recommended Factors for Safety for Axial Capacity of Driven and Drilled-in Soldier Beams
Factor of Safety on Factor of Safety on
Soil Type
Skin Friction End Bearing
Clays 2.5 2.5
Sands 2.0 2.5
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. FHWA-IF-99-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 14, p. 90.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
b a
Su H HB'
H H
d c
D
B/2
(a) FAILURE PLANES, DEEP DEPOSITS OF WEAK CLAY (b) FAILURE PLANE, STIFF LAYER BELOW BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
10
SQUARE AND
9
CIRCULAR B/L = 1
B/L = 0.5
8
NC H = EXCAVATION DEPTH
7 B = EXCAVATION WIDTH
L = LENGTH OF EXCAVATION
6 B/L = 0, RECTANGULAR
4
0 1 2 3 4 5
H/B
Su = shear strength
γ = soil density
H = excavation depth
B = excavation width
B' = B/ 2
L = length of excavation
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. FHWA-IF-99-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, p. 106.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
Presumptive Average Ultimate Bond Stress for Ground/Grout Interface Along Anchor Bond Zone (after PTI, 1966)
Rock Cohesive Soil Cohesionless Soil
Average Average Average
Rock Type Ultimate Bond Anchor Type Ultimate Bond Anchor Type Ultimate Bond
Stress (psi) Stress (psi) Stress (psi)
Granite and Gravity-grouted anchors Gravity-grouted anchors
250–450 5–10 10–20
basalt (straight shaft) (straight shaft)
Dolomitic
200–300 Pressure-grouted anchors (straight shaft)
limestone
Fine to med. sand, med.
Soft limestone 150–200 Soft silty clay 5–10 12–55
dense to dense
Slates and hard Med. to coarse sand
120–200 Silty clay 5–10 16–95
shales (w/gravel), med. dense
Med. to coarse sand
Stiff clay, med. to high
Soft shales 30–120 5–15 (w/gravel), dense to very 35–140
plasticity
dense
Very stiff clay, med. to
Sandstones 120–250 10–25 Silty sands 25–60
high plasticity
Weathered Stiff clay, med.
100–120 15–25 Dense glacial till 43–75
sandstones plasticity
Very stiff clay, med. Sandy gravel, med.
Chalk 30–155 20–50 31–200
plasticity dense to dense
Very stiff sandy silt, Sandy gravel, dense to
Weathered marl 25–35 40–55 40–200
med. plasticity very dense
Concrete 200–400
Note: Actual values for pressure-grouted anchors depend on the ability to develop pressures in each soil type.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. FHWA-IF-99-015.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 7, p. 73. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
POTENTIAL
FAILURE
SURFACE
WALL
4.5 m (min)
b
H
WALL
FACE Sh
χ
Properties of 15-mm Diameter Prestressing Steel Strands [ASTM A416, Grade 270 (metric 1860)]
Number of
15-mm-
Cross-Section Area Ultimate Strength Prestressing Force
Diameter
Strands
0.8 fpu Aps 0.7 fpu Aps 0.6 fpu Aps
(in2) (mm2) (kips) (kN) (kips) (kN) (kips) (kN) (kips) (kN)
1 0.217 140 58.6 260.7 46.9 209 41.0 182 35.2 156
3 0.651 420 175.8 782.1 140.6 626 123.1 547 105.5 469
4 0.868 560 234.4 1,043 187.5 834 164.1 730 140.6 626
5 1.085 700 293.0 1,304 234.4 1,043 205.1 912 175.8 782
7 1.519 980 410.2 1,825 328.2 1,460 287.1 1,277 246.1 1,095
9 1.953 1,260 527.4 2,346 421.9 1,877 369.2 1,642 316.4 1,408
12 2.604 1,680 703.2 3,128 562.6 2,503 492.2 2,190 421.9 1,877
15 3.255 2,100 879.0 3,911 703.2 3,128 615.3 2,737 527.4 2,346
19 4.123 2,660 1,113.4 4,953 890.7 3,963 779.4 3,467 668.0 2,972
Source: Reproduced with permission from ASTM. A416 Standard Specification for Low-Relaxation, Seven-Wire Steel Strand for Prestressed
Concrete. Copyright ASTM International, www.astm.org. As found in Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4:
Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems. FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 10, p. 78.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems.
FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 20, p. 131.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
TEMPORARY SUPPORT
OF EXCAVATION
PERMANENT
CLASS II
NONE
PROTECTION CLASS I CONSEQUENCES
PROTECTION OF FAILURE OF
ANCHORED
SYSTEM
COST FOR
CLASS I INCREASING
PROTECTION PROTECTION
LEVEL
SMALL SIGNIFICANT
CLASS I CLASS II
PROTECTION PROTECTION
Decision Tree for Selection of Corrosion Protection Level (modified after PTI, 1996)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems.
FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Fig. 63, p. 134.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
100
120
133
DESIGN LOAD
AL
25
50
75
0
1
δ r6 2
MOVEMENT 3
δ t6
4
δ e6
5
6
10 MIN
δt
δe
6
5
3
ELASTIC
MOVEMENT 2
1 PERCENT OF
25
133
100
120
DESIGN LOAD
75
50
AL
0
1 2
RESIDUAL 3
MOVEMENT 4
5
6
δr
Plotting Elastic and Residual Movement for a Performance Test (after PTI, 1996)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 4: Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems.
FHWA-IF-99-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Fig. 70, p. 146.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/if99015.pdf.
PERCENT OF
100
120
133
AL
25
50
75
DESIGN LOAD
r
TOTAL
MOVEMENT
t
OP
e TIO
NA
L
10 MIN
t
3.18.7 Settlement
0.0
CURVE I
CURVE II
0.3
(%)
0.5
DEPTH OF EXCAVATION
CURVE III
1.0
SETTLEMENT
CURVE I = SANDS
CURVE II = STIFF TO VERY HARD CLAYS
CURVE III = SOFT TO MEDIUM CLAYS
2.0
3.19 Pavements
VERY STRONG
DURABLE
IMPERMEABLE SURFACE
MANUFACTURED
STRONG
EXPENSIVE
BASE FREE-DRAINING
MANUFACTURED
LESS EXPENSIVE
MODERATE STRENGTH
FREE-DRAINING
NATURAL MATERIAL SUBBASE
INEXPENSIVE
WEAK
SUBGRADE MOISTURE SENSITIVE
IN SITU SOIL
Insufficient Insufficient
Moisture/
Base Subgrade Freeze/ Spatial
Drainage Swelling Contamination Erosion
Stiffness/ Stiffness/ Thaw Variability
Problems
Strength Strength
Fatigue
X X X X X
Cracking
Rutting X X X X X
Corrugations X
Bumps X X X
Depressions X X X X X
Potholes X X X
Roughness X X X X X X X
Insufficient Insufficient
Moisture/
Base Subgrade Freeze/ Spatial
Stiffness/ Stiffness/
Drainage
Thaw
Swelling Contamination Erosion
Variability
Problems
Strength Strength
Fatigue
Cracking
X X X X X X
Punchouts
(CRCP)
X X X X X X
Pumping X X
Faulting X X X X X X
Roughness X X X X X X X
* These tests can be used in pavement design to qualitatively evaluate subgrade stratification and determine optimum undisturbed sample locations
required to obtain design property values.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 4-7, p. 4-36.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
100%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0%
0
10 DEFLECTION
20
140 DEFLECTION
150
Typical Zone of Influence for an Asphalt Pavement Section (Vandre et al., 1998)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Fig. 4-3, p. 4-17.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 5-26, p. 5-34.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 5-28, p. 5-39.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
STRESS
N 1 2 3 4 ...
MR
STRAIN
Resilient Modulus under Cyclic Loading
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Fig. 5-14, p. 5-47.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
θ (psi) MR (psi)
100 740 × CBR
1,000 + 780 × R
30 440 × CBR
1,000 + 450 × R
20 340 × CBR
1,000 + 350 × R
10 250 × CBR
1,000 + 250 × R
M (psi) = A + B × (R-value)
R
Additional useful correlations for subgrade M are provided in the following figure (Subgrade Resilient Modulus).
R
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 5-31, p. 5-49.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
90 90
100
90
10 2.0 40,000
80
80 70
80
60 30,000
50
9
70
70 40 3.0
30 20,000
8
60
60
20
7 50
50
4.0
R VALUE (CALIFORNIA)
R VALUE (WASHINGTON)
MODULUS, MR (psi)
CBR – (KENTUCKY)
0 10,000
40 10
6 9,000
9000
40 9
8 8,000
8000
7 5
30 6 7,000
7000
5
S,
30 5
GROUP INDEX 6,000
6000
20 4 10 5,000
5000
5.0
4 20
3 4,000
4000
10 15
10 2 3,000
3000
3
0 20
2 0 6.0 2,000
2000
1
Correlations between Subgrade Resilient Modulus and Other Soil Properties (1 psi = 6.9 kPa)
(from Huang, 1993, after Van Til et al., 1972)
S, Soil Texas
Modulus, R Value Modulus, R Value Modulus, CBR Modulus, Modulus, Group Modulus,
Support Triaxial
MR (psi) (California) MR (psi) (Washington) MR (psi) (Kentucky) MR (psi) MR (psi) Index MR (psi)
Value Class
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Fig. 5-17, p. 5-52.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
MAX SLAB
ASSUMED RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN UNIT LOAD
AND DEFLECTION
P
UNIT LOAD ON PLATE
ACTUAL
CURVE
P psi
k pci
in.
PLATE DEFLECTION
Soft
150–300
(CBR < 3)
(MR < 30 MPa) > 300
Firm–Vy. Stiff
150–300
(3 ≤ CBR ≤ 8)
(30 ≤ MR ≤ 80) > 300
KEY: —usually applicable —applicable for some conditions
—usually not applicable —insufficient information at this time —see note
1. Total base or subbase thickness with geosynthetic reinforcement. Reinforcement may be placed at bottom of base or subbase,
or within base for thicker (usually > 300 mm (12 in.)) thicknesses. Thicknesses less than 150 mm (6 in.) not recommended
for construction over soft subgrade. Placement of less than 150 mm (6 in.) over a geosynthetic not recommended.
2. For open-graded base or thin bases over wet, fine grained subgrades, a separation geotextile should be considered with
geogrid reinforcement.
NOTES:
3. Potential assumes base placed directly on subgrade. A subbase also may provide filtration.
Reinforcement usually applicable, but typically addressed as a subgrade stabilization.
Geotextile component of composite likely is not required for filtration with a well-graded base course; therefore, composite
reinforcement usually not applicable.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 7-11, p. 7-38.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
LIME
BITUMEN
BITUMEN/
CEMENT BLENDS
GRANULAR
MISCELLANEOUS
CHEMICALS*
*Should be taken as a broad guideline only. Refer to trade literature for further information.
Note: The above forms of stabilization may be used in combination, e.g. lime stabilization
to dry out materials and reduce their plasticity, making them suitable for other methods of
stabilization.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements. FHWA-NHI-05-037.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, May 2006, Table 7-16, p. 7-78.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/03a.cfm.
L/2
L
The absolute maximum moment produced in a beam by a set of n moving loads occurs when the resultant R of the load
set and an adjacent load are equidistant from the centerline of the beam. In general, two possible load set positions must be
considered, one for each adjacent load.
MB = MA /2
θ I
MA
L
θ = 4EI " M = c L m θ = k AB θ
ML 4EI
where
kAB = stiffness
MA
=
M B = carryover
2
members
∆ joint = / fi ^∆Lhi
i=1
where
∆joint = joint displacement at point of application of unit load (+ in direction of unit load)
(∆L)i = change in length caused by external effect (+ for increase in member length):
= member misfit
where
L = member length
Li = length of member i
If either the real loads or the unit load cause no moment in a member, that member can be omitted from the summation.
A B
L
= = wL2
FEM AB FEM BA 12
b
A B
L
= Pab 2 Pa 2 b
FEM AB = FEM BA
L2 L2
M3 = maximum positive moment in beam with combined end moment conditions (in.-kips)
P2 = concentrated load nearest right reaction, and of different magnitude than P1 (kips)
V2 = vertical shear at right reaction point, or to left of intermediate reaction point of beam (kips)
V3 = vertical shear at right reaction point, or to right of intermediate reaction point of beam (kips)
b = measured distance along beam, which may be greater or less than a (in.)
w1 = uniformly distributed load per unit of length nearest left reaction (kip/in.)
w2 = uniformly distributed load per unit of length nearest right reaction and of different magnitude than w1
(kip/in.)
x1 = any distance measured along overhang section of beam from nearest reaction point (in.)
Dx1 = deflection of overhang section of beam at any distance from nearest reaction point (in.)
wc 2 − x m
l
R l l R Vx =
2 2
V Mmax (at center) = wl 2
8
SHEAR V
wx _ − i
Mx = 2 l x
M max
Dmax (at center) = 5wl 4
384EI
MOMENT
wx _ 3 2 3i
Dx = 24EI l − 2lx + x
2. Simple Beam—Load Increasing Uniformly to One End
W
l R1 = V1 =
3
x
W 2W
R2 = V2 = Vmax =
3
R1 R2
0.5574 l
Vx = W − Wx 2
3 l2
V1
SHEAR V2
Mmax =
M max Wx _ 2 2 i
Mx = l −x
3l 2
MOMENT
Dmax Wl 3
= 0.0130 EI
Wx _ 4
Dx = 3x − 10l 2 x 2 + 7l 4 i
180EIl 2
Mmax d at x = a + 1 n R1 d a + 1 n
V1 SHEAR R R
w =
R1 V2 2w
a+
w
Mx (when x < a ) = R1x
M max w _ − i2
R1 x −
Mx [when x > a and < (a + b)] = 2 x a
MOMENT
Mx [when x > (a + b)] = R2(l – x)
5. Simple Beam—Uniform Load Partially Distributed at One End
wa _ − i
R1 = V1 = Vmax = 2l a
2l
l R2 = V2 = wa 2
a 2l
wa
Vx (when x < a) = R1 – wx
R1 R2
x Mmax d at x = 1 n
R
= R12
w 2w
V1
SHEAR wx 2
R1 V2 Mx (when x < a ) = R1 x − 2
w
Mx (when x > a ) = R2(l – x)
M max wx 9 2 3C
24EIl a _2l − a i − 2ax _2l − a i + lx
Dx (when x < a ) = 2 2
MOMENT
wa 2 _l − x i
Dx (when x > a ) = _4xl − 2x 2 − a 2 i
24EIl
w 2 c _2l − c i + w1 a 2
R2 = V2 =
2l
l
Vx (when x < a) = R1 – w1x
a b c
w1a Vx [when a < x < (a + b)] = R1 – w1a
w2 c
w1 a 2
Mx [when a < x < (a + b)] = R1 x − _ − i
2 2x a
w 2 _l − x i
2
Mx [when x > (a + b)] = R 2 _l − x i − 2
l
Total Equiv. Uniform Load = 2P
x P
P
R=V = 2
Dmax =
M max
M1 M 2 M (when x < a)
x = R1x
MOMENT
Mx [when a < x < (l – b)] = R1x – P1(x – a)
= 96EI _ x − l i _11x − 2l i
P
Dx c when x 2 2 m
l 2
14. Beam Fixed at One End, Supported at Other—Concentrated Load at Any Point
R1 = V1 = Pb 2 _ + i
a 2l
2l 3
Pa _ 2
R2 = V2 = 3l − a 2 i
l 2l 3
x M1 (at point of load) = R1a
P Pab _ + i
M2 (at fixed end) = a l
2l 2
R1 a b R2 Mx (when x < a) = R1 x
V1 Mx (when x > a) = R1 x − P _ x − a i
SHEAR V2 _l 2 + a 2 i Pa _l − a i
3
Dmax >when a 1 0.414l at x = l H =
2 2
_3l 2 − a 2 i 3EI _ 2
3l − a 2 i
2
M1
MOMENT M2 D =
Pa max
R2
Da (at point of load) = Pa 2 b 3 _ + i
3l a
12EIl 3
R=V = wl
l 2
x
wl
w c 2 − xm
l
Vx =
R l l R
2 2 Mmax (at ends) = wl 2
12
V
SHEAR V M1 (at center) = wl 2
24
M1 w _ 2 2i
MOMENT M max
Mx = 12 6lx − l − 6x
0.211 l wl 4
Dmax (at center) = 384EI
Dx = wx 2 _ − i2
24EI l x
16. Beam Fixed at Both Ends—Concentrated Load at Center
Total Equiv. Uniform Load = P
l
x P P
R=V = 2
l l
R 2 2 R Pl
Mmax (at center and ends) = 8
V
Mx c when x 1 2 m
l P_ − i
SHEAR V = 8 4x l
1
l Pl 3
4 Dmax (at center) =
M max 192EI
MOMENT M max
Dx c when x 1 2 m Px 2 _ − i
l
=
48EI 3l 4x
Pa 2 _ + i
R2 = V2 (= Vmax when a > b) = a 3b
l3
l Pab 2
M1 (= Mmax when a < b) =
P l2
x
Pa 2 b
R1 R2
M2 (= Mmax when a > b) =
a b l2
V1 2Pa 2 b 2
Ma (at point of load) =
SHEAR V2 l3
Pab 2
Mx (when x < a) = R1 x −
Ma l2
M1 MOMENT M2
Dmax c when a 2 b at x = 3a + b m 2Pa 3 b 2
2al
=
3EI _3a + b i
2
Pa 3 b 3
Da (at point of load) =
3EIl 3
Pb 2 x 2 _ −
Dx (when x < a) = 3al 3ax − bx i
6EIl 3
18. Cantilevered Beam—Load Increasing Uniformly to Fixed End
8
Total Equiv. Uniform Load = 3W
l R=V = W
W
x2
Vx = W 2
x R l
Wl
Mmax (at fixed end) = 3
SHEAR
V
Mx = Wx 3
3l 2
SHEAR V
Mx = wx 2
2
w _l 2 − x 2 i
2
Dx =
24EI
a b
Mx (when x > a) = P (x – a)
R
Dmax (at free end) = Pb 2 _ − i
6EI 3l b
SHEAR V
Da (at point of load) = Pb 3
3EI
P _l − x i
2
Dx (when x > a) = _3b − l + x i
6EI
22. Cantilevered Beam—Concentrated Load at Free End
l Total Equiv. Uniform Load = 8P
P
R=V = P
x R Mmax (at fixed end) = Pl
Mx = Px
V
SHEAR
Dmax (at free end) = Pl 3
3EI
M max P _ 3 2 3i
6EI 2l − 3l x + x
MOMENT Dx =
23. Beam Fixed at One End, Free to Deflect Vertically but Not Rotate at Other—Concentrated Load at Deflected End
Total Equiv. Uniform Load = 4P
l
R=V = P
P
Pl
M Mmax (at both ends) = 2
x R
P c 2 − xm
l
Mx =
V
SHEAR l
Dmax (at deflected end) = Pl 3
2
M max 12EI
P _l − x i
MOMENT M max 2
Dx = _l + 2x i
12EI
M x1 (for overhang) = w _a − x i2
2 1
wx _ 4
Dx (between supports) = − 2 2 + 3 − 2 2 + 2 2i
24EIl l 2l x lx 2a l 2a x
` 2 − 3+ 2 − 2 + 3j
wx1
∆ x1 (for overhang) =
24EI 4a l l 6a x1 4ax1 x1
Note: For a negative value of Dx, deflection is upward.
25. Beam Overhanging One Support—Uniformly Distributed Load on Overhang
R1 = V1 = wa 2
2l
wa _ + i
R2 = V1 + V2 = 2l a
2l
V2 = wa
l
x1
a
Vx1 (for overhang) = w _a − x1 i
x
wa
Mmax (at R2) = wa 2
2
R1 R2
Mx (between supports) = wa 2 x
V2 2l
V1
M x1 (for overhang) = w _a − x i2
SHEAR 1
2
l wa 2 l 2 = wa 2 l 2
MOMENT
M max Dmax e between supports at x = o = 0.0321 EI
3 18 3 EI
Dx (between supports) = wa 2 x _ 2 2 i
−
12EIl l x
` 2 + 2 − 2 + 3j
wx1
∆ x1 (for overhang) =
24EI 4a l 6a x1 4ax1 x1
M max
MOMENT
Dmax (for overhang at x1 = a) = Pa 2 _ + i
3EI l a
Pax _ 2 2 i
Dx (between supports) = −
6EIl l x
` + − 2j
Px1
∆ x1 (for overhang) =
6EI 2al 3ax1 x1
27. Beam Overhanging One Support—Uniformly Distributed Load Between Supports
Total Equiv. Uniform Load = wl
wl
R=V = 2
l a
w c 2 − xm
x x1 l
wl
Vx =
R l l R
Mmax (at center) = wl 2
2 2 8
V
wx _ − i
SHEAR V Mx = 2 l x
wl 2 − M1 + M 2 + _ M1 − M 2 i
2
M − M2
M3 e at x = l + 1 o
=
V1 2 wl 8 2
SHEAR
2wl 2
V2
Mx = wx _ − i + e M1 − M 2 o −
x M1
M3
M2
2 l x l
M1 b b
MOMENT b (to locate inflection
=
points)
4M1 4M 2 2 12M1 8M l 4M l
Dx =
wx > 3 −
x d 2l + − n x + w x + l 3 − w1 − w2 H
24EI wl wl
33. Beam—Concentrated Load at Center and Variable End Moments
P + M1 − M 2
R1 = V1 =
2 l
l P − M1 − M 2
R2 = V2 =
x P 2 l
M1 M2
R1
l
M1 > M2
l
R2
M3 (at center) = Pl − M1 − M 2
2 2 4 2
Mx c when x 1 2 m
V1 l M1 − M 2
SHEAR V2 = xeP + o − M1
2 l
Mx c when x 2 2 m P _ − i + x _ M1 − M 2 i −
M3 l
M2 = M1
2 l x
M1 MOMENT
l
Dx c when x 1 2 m
l
= Px ) 2
− 2 − 8 _l − x i 8M _ − i + M _ + iB3
48EI 3l 4x
Pl 1 2l x 2 l x
Vx c when x 1 2 m
W l 2
= W d l 2x n
−
2 l
R R
l l
2 2 Mmax (at center) = Wl
12
V
Mx c when x 1 2 m
l W f − 2x 2 + 4x 3 p
SHEAR V = x
2 l 3l 2
3Wl 3
M max Dmax (at center) = 320EI
MOMENT
Dx c when x 1 2 m
l
= W f 3 − x 4 + 2x 5 − 3l 2 x p
x
12EI l 5l 2 8
V Mx (when x > a) = R (l – x)
SHEAR
x3
= 6EI >e 6a − 3a − 2l o x − H
M 2
M1 Dx (when x < a)
l l
M2 MOMENT
3
= 6EI >3 _a 2 + x 2 i − x − x e 2l + 3a oH
M 2
Dx (when x > a)
l l
0.383 w l 0.583wl
0.0330wl 0.0330wl
SHEAR
0.617wl 0.417wl
+ 0.0735wl 2
+0.0534wl 2
– 0.117wl 2
MOMENT
– 0.0333wl 2
0.383l 0.583l
wl4
___
max(0.430l from A) = 0.0059 EI
38. Continuous Beam—Three Equal Spans—End Spans Loaded
l l l
wl wl
A B C D
RA = 0.450wl RB = 0.550wl RC = 0.550wl RD = 0.450wl
0.450wl 0.550wl
SHEAR
0.550wl 0.450wl
+ 0.101wl 2
+ 0.101wl 2
MOMENT
0.450l 0.450l
– 0.0500wl 2
wl4
max(0.479l from A or D) = 0.0099 ___
EI
39. Continuous Beam—Three Equal Spans—All Spans Loaded
l l l
wl wl wl
A B C D
RA = 0.400wl RB = 1.10wl RC = 1.10wl RD = 0.400wl
0.400wl 0.500wl 0.600wl
0.400wl
SHEAR
0.600wl 0.500wl
+0.0800wl 2
+0.0800wl 2
+0.0250wl 2
MOMENT – 0.100wl 2
– 0.100wl 2
wl4
max(0.446l from A or D) = 0.0069 ___
EI
wl4
___
max(0.475l from E) = 0.0094 EI
l l l l
wl wl
A B C D E
RA = 0.446wl RB = 0.572wl RC = 0.464wl RD = 0.572wl RE = 0.0540wl
0.446wl 0.482wl
0.0180wl 0.0540wl 0.0540wl
SHEAR
0.554wl 0.518wl
+0.0996wl 2 +0.0805wl 2
MOMENT
0.446l – 0.0536wl 2 – 0.0357wl 2 0.518l – 0.0536wl 2
wl4
max(0.477l from A) = 0.0097___
EI
42. Continuous Beam—Four Equal Spans—All Spans Loaded
l l l l
wl wl wl wl
A B C D E
RA = 0.393wl RB = 1.14wl RC = 0.928wl RD = 1.14wl RE = 0.393wl
0.393wl 0.536wl 0.464wl 0.607wl
SHEAR
0.607wl 0.464wl 0.536wl 0.393wl
+0.0772wl 2
+0.0364wl 2
+0.0364wl 2 +0.0772wl 2
MOMENT – 0.107wl 2
– 0.107wl 2
wl4
___
max(0.440l from A to E) = 0.0065 EI
P c2 − l m
a
R1 max = V1 max (at x = 0) =
x a 2
P c − am
P P = l 2
2l
R1 1 2 R2
l
= Pl
4
Source: American Institute of Steel Construction, Steel Construction Manual, 14th ed, 2011, Table 3-23. pp. 3-213 through 3-228.
Copyright American Institute of Steel Construction. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
F 11 F 12
1 F 21 2
M F 22
F 14 F 13
F 24
4 3 y
x
F 23
The location of the centroid of a fastener group with respect to any convenient coordinate frame is
n n
/ Ai xi / Ai yi
i=1 i=1
=x = n , y n
Ai Ai / /
i=1 i=1
where
The total shear force on a fastener is the vector sum of the force due to direct shear P and the force due to the moment M
acting on the group at its centroid.
This force acts perpendicular to a line drawn from the group centroid to the center of a particular fastener. Its sense is such
that its moment is in the same direction (CW or CCW) as M.
tf
tf
tw tw
h h
w w w w
PZ NZ
.
Nucor Skyline. "NZ and PZ Hot-Rolled Sheet Piles Datasheet." Accessed June 11, 2021. https://www.nucorskyline.com/documentlibrary/datasheets
SPECIFICATION,
SIDE
(BOTH SIDES)
PROCESS, OR
OTHER REFERENCE S(E)
L-P
T
TAIL (OMITTED
B
ARROW
WHEN REFERENCES A
SIDE
NOT USED)
ARROW CONNECTS REFERENCE
LINE TO ARROW SIDE OF JOINT. USE
BASIC WELD SYMBOL OR ELEMENTS IN
BREAK AS AT A OR B TO SIGNIFY
DETAIL REFERENCE THIS AREA
THAT ARROW IS POINTING TO THE
REMAIN AS
GROOVED MEMBER IN BEVEL OR
SHOWN WHEN
J-GROOVED JOINTS
TAIL AND ARROW
ARE REVERSED
Notes:
Size, weld symbol, length of weld, and spacing must read in that order, from left to right, along
the reference line. Neither orientation of reference nor location of the arrow alters this rule.
The perpendicular leg of , , , and weld symbols must be at left.
Dimensions of fillet welds must be shown on both the arrow side and the other side.
Symbols apply between abrupt changes in direction of welding unless governed by the "all
around" symbol or otherwise dimensioned.
These symbols do not explicitly provide for the case that frequently occurs in structural work,
where duplicate material (such as stiffeners) occurs on the far side of a web or gusset plate.
The fabricating industry has adopted this convention: when the billing of the detail material
discloses the existence of a member on the far side as well as on the near side, the welding
shown for the near side shall be duplicated on the far side.
Source: American Institute of Steel Construction, Steel Construction Manual, 14th ed, 2011, Table 8-2, p. 8-35.
Copyright American Institute of Steel Construction. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved..
Reproduced, with permission from ASTM A1064 Standard Specification for Carbon-Steel Wire and Welded Wire Reinforcement, Plain and
Deformed, for Concrete, copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.
Reproduced, with permission from ASTM A1064 Standard Specification for Carbon-Steel Wire and Welded Wire Reinforcement, Plain and
Deformed, for Concrete, copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.
f cl _psii b1
d = distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of longitudinal tension reinforcement (in.)
Ec =
Pu = factored axial force: to be taken as positive for compression and negative for tension (lb)
Single-Reinforced Beams:
d
Ms jd
T
fs
where
Traffic flow is the equivalent hourly rate at which vehicles pass a point on a highway during a period less than 1 hour:
n _3, 600 i
q= T
where
l = length of roadway
Headway n
t= / hi
i=1
where
hi = time headway of the ith vehicle (time transpired between arrivals of vehicle i and i – 1)
n = number of vehicles
q = k # us
where R can be divided by the average length of a vehicle to get an estimate of density k.
Source: Khisty-Lall. Transportation Engineering: An Introduction. 3rd ed. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2003, p. 123.
5.1.2 Street Segment Interrupted Flow (e.g., Level of Service, Running Time, Travel Speed)
5.1.2.1 Speed-Density Model
u s = u f e1 − k o
k
j
where
k = density (veh/mi)
kj
kcap =
2
uf
ucap =
2
kj
qcap = u f
4
where
5.1.3 Traffic Analysis (e.g., Volume Studies, Peak Hour Factor, Speed Studies, Modal Split)
5.1.3.1 Average Annual Daily Traffic Estimation
Average annual daily traffic (AADT)
where
Vavg
DF = V
day
where
Vavg = average daily count for all days of the week (vehicles)
Vday = average daily count for each day of the week (vehicles)
AADT
MFi =
ADTi
where
AADT = average annual daily traffic (vehicles/day) (estimated as the average of 12 monthly ADTs)
where
The AAWT is computed as the total weekday volume divided by 260 days, or:
5.1.4 Accident Analysis (e.g., Conflict Analysis, Accident Rates, Collision Diagrams)
5.1.4.1 Acceleration
Acceleration Assumed Constant
When the acceleration of the vehicle is assumed to be constant:
= dS d 2 x
a =
dt dt 2
where
dS = a dt
S = at + S0
S0 = initial speed
dx
S = at + S0 =
dt
dx = _at + S0 i dt
1
x = 2 at 2 + S0 t + x0
5.1.4.2 Acceleration Characteristics of Typical Car Versus Typical Truck on Level Terrain
Source: McShane, William, Roger Roess, and Elena Prassas. Traffic Engineering. 4th ed. New York: Pearson, 2011, Table 2.5, p. 30.
where
db = horizontal distance traveled (ft) in reducing speed of vehicle from v1 to v2 during braking maneuvers
ESALDL = DD × DL × ESAL
where
ESAL = cumulative two-directional 18-kip Equivalent Single Axle Loads units predicted during the analysis period
DD = directional distribution factor, expressed as a ratio, that accounts for the distribution of ESAL units by
direction
DL = lane distribution factor, expressed as a ratio, that accounts for distribution of traffic when two or more lanes
are available in one direction. If no other information is provided, the following table may be used as a guide:
Source: Based on information from AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, 1993, published by the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
PI
L V Δ
E
T T
Δ M
PC PT
2
A B
R R
Δ
2
Δ
T = tangent length
M = middle ordinate
PC = point of curve
PT = point of tangent
PI = point of intersection
E = external distance
D D D
D D D D D
where
PI
V
q v
p s
PC PT
A B
D D D
1 2
where
5, 729.6
R = Da
100 c 180
π
m
18, 000
Da = =
R πR
50
R = Dc
sin 2
∆
T = R tan
2
∆
C = 2R sin 2
1 −
E = R sec − R = T c tan 4 m = R f cos ∆ p
∆ ∆ 1
2 2
∆
M = R − R cos
2
= R c1 − cos ∆ m
2
R∆ π
L =
180
Rδ1 π
l1 =
180
δ1 l1
=
∆ L
∆
L = 100 D
a
where
PI
V
T1
T2
2
t1 G 1 PCC H
t2
PC
2 PT
1 R2
R1
= ∆1 + ∆2
PI = point of intersection
PC = point of curve
PT = point of tangent
VG = VH = t1 + t 2 t +t
= 1 2
sin ∆ 2 sin ∆1 sin _180 − ∆ i sin ∆
where
T1 = VG + t1
∆1
t1 = R1 tan 2
∆2
t 2 = R 2 tan 2
T2 = VH + t 2
Tb
CC1
C′ ′ Y1
2
CC
R2 R3
1 2 B
3
R1
2 90– I
1 O3
1 O2
O1
A three-centered compound curve has centers at O1, O2, and O3 with central angles equal to ∆1, ∆2, and ∆3.
Proceeding from flatter to sharper curve, the radii are R1, R2, and R3.
Ta = AV = long tangent
Tb = VB = short tangent
X1, Y1 equals the coordinates of point B with reference to A as origin and AV as X axis, where X1 = AD and Y1 = DB. Then,
Y1 = Tb # sin I
X1 = Ta + Tb # cos I
Y1
Tb =
sin I
Ta = X1 − Tb # cos I
X1 = R1 sin ∆1 + R 2 sin _∆1 + ∆ 2 i − R 2 sin ∆1 + R3 sin I − R3 sin _ ∆1 + ∆ 2 i
OR
X1 = _ R1 − R 2 i sin ∆1 + _ R 2 − R3 i sin _ ∆1 + ∆ 2 i + R3 sin I
R2
m1
Δ
p
C E
D
m2
R1
Δ
O1
d
where
d = DE = DC + CE
If equal:
R1 = R 2 = R
d p
DC = CE = 2 and m1 = m 2 = 2
d = R1 sin ∆ + R 2 sin ∆ = _ R1 + R 2 i sin ∆
p = R1 _1 − cos ∆ i + R 2 _1 − cos ∆ i = _ R1 + R 2 i _1 − cos ∆ i
• The bearing of a line is the horizontal acute angle between the meridian and the line
• Because the bearing of a line cannot exceed 90°, the full horizontal circle is divided into four quadrants: northeast,
southeast, southwest, and northwest.
Northing = latitude = Y = distance × cos (bearing)
N (Y)
LATITUDE
∆Y
α
L
E (X)
DEPARTURE
∆X
N A
D
E
0°
N
4
40
B
N
°W
40° 40°
NW NE
QUADRANT QUADRANT
E
W E 0 0'
SW SE 65° 65°
N W
QUADRANT QUADRANT 65° 00'
W 40° 40° 5°
0° S6
4
S
S
40
°E
C B
A
S
Example Bearings
Xc
MINIMUM (SAFE) STOPPING DISTANCE
The physical zone between Xc and X0, when Xc > X0, is the dilemma zone. In this situation, the word "dilemma" exactly
represents such a circumstance, although the driver may not be aware of it.
V2
Xc = 1 . 47V _tstop i + 1 . 075 a
2
X0 = 1 . 47VY − W + a1 _Y − t passing i
1 2
2
where
5.4.2 Offsets
The time difference between a common reference point in the coordinated phases at adjacent signalized intersections is
referred to as the offset. Assuming a moving platoon, the offset is calculated as:
do
offset = V
where
offset = start of green phase for downstream intersection relative to upstream intersection, for the same
traffic movement (sec)
where
For good progression in both directions, the cycle length (for both intersections) needs to be twice the travel time from
Intersection 1 to Intersection 2:
do
C prog = V # 2
where Cprog = cycle length necessary for ideal two-way progression (sec)
Sources: Mannering, Fred L. and Scott S. Washburn. Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic Analysis. 5th ed.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2012, p. 262 & Garber, Nicholas J. and Lester A. Hoel, Traffic & Highway Engineering,
5th ed., 2014, Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, Inc., 2015, p. 250-264.
where
G = grade of approach
where
w = width of intersection measured from near-side stop line to far side point of clearance
Using the definition of dry unit weight, relative density in terms of maximum and minimum dry unit weights can be
expressed as:
<γ 1 F − ; γ1 E
d^min h γ d − γ d^minh γ ^ h
== G< d max F
d
Dr = γ d^max h − γ d^min h γd
<γ 1 F − <γ 1 F
d^min h d^max h
where
VOLUME OF SOIL
Vf
Shrinkage Limits
Source: Das, Braja M. and Nagaratnam Sivakugan, Fundamentals of Geotechnical Engineering, 5th ed., 2017,
Cengage Learning, Inc. Reproduced by permission. www.cengage.com/permissions.
The moisture content at which the volume change of the soil mass ceases is defined as the shrinkage limit. The shrinkage
limit is determined by the equation:
SL = wi – Dw
where
SL = shrinkage limit
wi = initial moisture content when the soil is placed in the shrinkage limit dish (%)
However,
m1 − m 2
wi _ % i = m 2 # 100
where
m1 = mass of the wet soil pat in the dish at the beginning of the test
_Vi − V f i ρ w
∆w _ % i = m2 # 100
where
ρw = density of water
_Vi − V f i ρ w
m_100 i − = G_100 i
m1 − m 2
SL = c m2 m2
PORCELAIN
(a) DISH (b)
γ d (w = w1) = γ d (w = 0) + ∆γ d
After a certain point, (w = w2), the dry unit weight decreases as the moisture content increases.
The moisture content at maximum dry weight is the optimum moisture content.
The percentage of combined aggregate passing a given sieve size (P) is calculated as
P = Aa + Bb + Cc + ...
where
a, b, c … = proportions of each aggregate needed to meet the requirements for material passing the given
sieve (given that a + b + c … = 100)
Asphalt absorption:
G se − G sb
Pba = 100Gb
G sb G se
Effective asphalt content:
Pba
Pbe = Pb − P
100 s
Percent voids in compacted mineral aggregates:
G mb Ps
VMA = 100 −
G sb
Pb = asphalt percent by total weight of paving mixture (thus, 100 – Pb is the percent by weight of the base
mixture that is not asphalt)
5.5.6.2 Asphalt Concrete Volumetric Terms and Definitions Using Phase Diagram
AIR Va Vma
Vse Vsb
Msb AGGREGATE
Phase Diagram
Source: Asphalt Institute. MS2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute, 2015.
M mb
Gmb = Bulk specific gravity =
Vmb # ρ H 2 O
M mb
Gmm = Maximum specific gravity = V #ρ
mm H2 O
Volumetric Indices
Vma
VMA = Voids in mineral aggregate =
Vmb 100
#
V fa
VFA = Voids filled with asphalt =
Vma 100
#
Va G mb
VTM (% Air) = Air voids = V # 100 = e1 − G o # 100
mb mm
Other
Mba
% Absorption = Absorbed asphalt content =
M sb 100
#
Source: Asphalt Institute. MS2 Asphalt Mix Design Methods. 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute, 2015.
7 12 n
1
AADTTc = 7 / >121 / f 1n / AADTTijkc pH
i=1 j=1 k=1
where
AADTTijkc = average daily traffic volume for vehicle class c, for day k, for day of the week (DOW) i, and
for month j
n = number of times data from a particular DOW is available for computing the average in a given
month (i.e., 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5)
AADTTc = average annual daily truck traffic volume for vehicle class c
VOLcj = average annual daily truck traffic volume for vehicle class c and month j that can be obtained from
automatic vehicle classification data
General equation for the accumulation ESAL (Equivalent Single Axle Load) for each category of axle load is:
where
ESALi = equivalent accumulated 18,000-lb (80 kN) single-axle load for the axle category i
Grn = growth factor for a given growth rate r and design period n
AADTi = first year annual average daily traffic for axle category i
R 0.08206 L•atm/(mole•K)
SG = specific gravity
m
ρ = density (also called mass density) = V
m = mass of volume
ρw = mass density of water at standard conditions = 62.4 lbm/ft3, 1.94 slug/ft3, or 1,000 kg/m3
1 slug = 1 lbf-sec2/ft
A = area
τn = –P
where
P = pressure at Point 1
dv = differential velocity
where
τt = K(dv/dy)n
where
K = consistency index
n > 1 ≡ dilatant
6.1.4.2 Manometers
P2
h2
P0 x
h1
1
P1
2
Source: Bober, W., and Kenyon, R.A., Fluid Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, 1980, Fig. 3-7, p. 49.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
If h1 = h2 = h,
P = pressure
h = height
ρ = fluid density
6.1.4.3 Barometers
Another device that works on the same principle as the manometer is the simple barometer.
Patm = PA = Pv + γh = PB + γh = PB + ρgh
Pv PB
h
Patm
BAROMETER
RESERVOIR
Pv = vapor pressure of the barometer fluid
Source: Bober, W., and Kenyon, R.A., Fluid Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, 1980, Fig. 3-8, p. 51.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
h = y sin θ h θy
Patm
θ
LIQUID h Patm z PLANAR VIEW FROM ABOVE
SIDE VIEW
(y-z PLANE) P dF (x-y PLANE)
FR
dA
yC
y
y yCP
x
dA
y CENTROID (C)
CENTER OF PRESSURE (CP)
Submerged Plane Surface
Source: Republished with permission of John Wiley and Sons from Engineering Fluid Mechanics, 10th ed., 2012, Fig. 3-20;
permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
where
P = pressure
yC = hC/sin θ
If atmospheric pressure acts above the liquid surface and on the nonwetted side of the submerged surface:
yCP = yC + IxC/yCA
where
1. The buoyant force exerted on a submerged or floating body is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the
body.
2. A floating body displaces a weight of fluid equal to its own weight; i.e., a floating body is in equilibrium.
The center of buoyancy is located at the centroid of the displaced fluid volume.
In the case of a body lying at the interface of two immiscible fluids, the buoyant force equals the sum of the weights of the
fluids displaced by the body.
6.1.5 Chemistry
6.1.5.1 Definitions
Avogadro's Number—The number of elementary particles in a mol of a substance
aA + bB E cC + dD
[C] c [D] d
Keq =
[A] a [B] b
Le Chatelier's Principle for Chemical Equilibrium—When a stress (such as a change in concentration, pressure, or
temperature) is applied to a system in equilibrium, the equilibrium shifts in such a way that it tends to relieve the stress.
Heats of Reaction, Solution, Formation, and Combustion—Chemical processes generally involve the absorption or
evolution of heat. In an endothermic process, heat is absorbed (enthalpy change is positive). In an exothermic process, heat
is evolved (enthalpy change is negative).
Faraday's Equation:
m = d nb M l
Q
F z
where
F = 96,485 coulombs/mol
z = valence number
A catalyst is a substance that alters the rate of a chemical reaction. The catalyst does not affect the position of equilibrium
of a reversible reaction.
Boiling Point Elevation—The presence of a nonvolatile solute in a solvent raises the boiling point of the resulting solution.
Freezing Point Depression—The presence of a solute lowers the freezing point of the resulting solution.
57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
Lanthanide Series La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
138.91 140.12 140.91 144.24 (145) 150.36 151.96 157.25 158.92 162.50 164.93 167.26 168.93 173.04 174.97
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103
Actinide Series Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr
227.03 232.04 231.04 238.03 237.05 (244) (243) (247) (247) (251) (252) (257) (258) (259) (260)
Source: Viessman, W., and M. J. Hammer. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th ed. New York: Pearson, 1985, Table 11.1, p. 353.
where
ξ = extent in moles
vi = stoichiometric coefficient of the ith species, the sign of which is negative for reactants and positive
for products
Limiting reactant—Reactant that would be consumed first if the reaction proceeded to completion. Other reactants are
excess reactants.
Yield—Moles of desired product formed/moles that would have been formed if there were no side reactions and the limiting
reactant had reacted completely.
Atomic or
Symbol or Molecular Equivalent
Name Formula Weight Weight
Aluminum Al3+ 27.0 9.0
Calcium Ca2+ 40.1 20.0
Carbon C 12.0
Chloride Cl− 35.5 35.5
Hydrogen H+ 1.0 1.0
Magnesium Mg2+ 24.3 12.2
Manganese Mn2+ 54.9 27.5
Nitrogen N 14.0
Oxygen O 16.0
Phosphorus P 31.0
Sodium Na+ 23.0 23.0
Source: Adapted from Viessman, W., and M. J. Hammer. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th ed. New York: Pearson, 1985, Table 11.2, p. 355.
where
fti
âi = activity of component i =
f i°
tfi = fugacity of pure i in its standard state at the equilibrium reaction temperature T
fti = yi P = pi
` p Cc j` p D
dj ` y Cc j` y D
dj
Then Ka = K p = = Pc + d − a − b
` p aA j` p bB j ` y aA j` y bB j
For solids:
âi= 1
For liquids:
âi = xi γi
aA + bB ↔ cC + dD
The rate of reaction of any component is defined as the moles of that component formed per unit time per unit volume.
dN A
− rA =− 1 _ negative because A disappears i
V dt
− dC A
− rA = if V is constant
dt
The rate of reaction is frequently expressed by
where
CI = concentration of component I
In the conversion of A, the fractional conversion XA is defined as the moles of A reacted per mole of A fed.
k = Ae −E a RT
where
T = temperature (K)
ln e o
RT1 T2 k1
Ea =
_T1 − T2 i k 2
Reaction Order
If
−rA = kC Ax C By
the reaction is x order with respect to reactant A and y order with respect to reactant B. The overall order is
n=x+y
dX A / _− rA i
XA
t = C A0 #0
Zero-Order Irreversible Reaction
− rA = kC 0A = k ^1 h
− dC A dt = k or
C A = C A0 − kt
dX A dt = k C A0 or
C A0 X A = kt
First-Order Irreversible Reaction
−rA = kC A
− dC A dt = kC A or
ln `C A C A0 j =−kt
dX A dt = k _1 − X A i or
ln _1 − X A i =−kt
V = VX A = 0 _1 + ε A X A i
where
VX A = 1 − VX A = 0
εA = = ∆V
VX A = 0 VX A = 0
then at any time,
1 − XA
C A = C A0 > + H
1 ε AXA
and
dX A / 9_1 + ε A X A i_− rA iC
XA
t = C A0 #0
For a first-order irreversible reaction:
kt =−ln _1 − X A i =−ln d1 − ε V n
∆V
A XA = 0
C A0 VPFR X A dX A
τ= FA0
= C A0
0
#
_− rA i
τN-reactors = Nτindividual
1 N
= N >e A0 o − 1H
C
k C AN
where
where
Pt = population at time t
k = growth rate
ln Pt = ln P0 + k∆t
where
Pt = population at time t
k = growth rate
where
Pt = population at time t
k = growth rate
n = number of periods
where
Pt = population at time t
S = saturation population
t = future time
t0 = initial time
6.2 Hydraulics
6.2.1 Principles of One-Dimensional Fluid Flow
6.2.1.1 Continuity Equation
So long as the flow Q is continuous, the continuity equation, as applied to one-dimensional flows, states that the flow
passing two points (1 and 2) in a stream is equal at each point, A1v1 = A2v2.
Q = Av
mo = ρQ = ρAv
where
ρ = fluid density
For steady, one-dimensional flow, mo is a constant. If, in addition, the density is constant, then Q is constant.
P1 v12 P 2 v 22
+ z +
ρg 1 2g ρg = + z 2 2g + h f
+
where hf = the head loss, considered a friction effect, and all remaining terms are defined above.
If the cross-sectional area and the elevation of the pipe are the same at both sections (1 and 2), then z1 = z2 and v1 = v2.
P1 – P2 = γ hf = ρghf
z1, z2 = vertical distance from a datum to the sections (the potential energy)
ρ = fluid density
where
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, p. 663.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, p. 664.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
where
Re = Reynolds number
The critical Reynolds number (Re)c is defined to be the minimum Reynolds number at which a flow will turn turbulent.
A chart that gives f versus Re for various values of ε/D, known as a Moody, Darcy, or Stanton friction factor diagram, is
available in this section.
where
v = fluid velocity
ρ = mass density
µ = dynamic viscosity
o = kinematic viscosity
K = consistency index
The velocity distribution for laminar flow in circular tubes or between planes is
2
v ^ r h = v max >1 − c R m H
r
where
R = radius (m) of the tube, or half the distance between the parallel planes
.08
.05 .02
.015
.010
.008
.006
LAMINAR
.03
FLOW CRITICAL Re .004
= 64/Re
ff=64/Re
.002
.02 SM .0010
OO .0008
TH
PIP .0006
ES
.0004
.0002
.00010
.00006
.0000
2 .00004
.01 .000
6 8 103 2 4 6 8 104 2 4 6 8 105 2 4 6 8 106 2 3 01 6 8 107 2 4 6 8 108
vD
REYNOLDS NUMBER (Re = — )
* The Fanning Friction is this factor divided by 4.
ε (ft) ε (mm)
GLASS, DRAWN BRASS, COPPER, LEAD SMOOTH SMOOTH
COMMERCIAL STEEL, WROUGHT IRON 0.0001–0.0003 0.03–0.09
ASPHALTED CAST IRON 0.0002–0.0006 0.06–0.18
GALVANIZED IRON 0.0002–0.0008 0.06–0.24
CAST IRON 0.0006–0.003 0.18–0.91
CONCRETE 0.001–0.01 0.30–3.0
RIVETED STEEL 0.003–0.03 0.91–9.1
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 0.1–0.2 30–61
LARGE TUNNEL, CONCRETE OR STEEL LINED 0.002–0.004 0.61–1.2
BLASTED ROCK TUNNEL 1.0–2.0 300–610
where
ε = roughness factor for the pipe, and other symbols as defined previously
πR 4 ∆P f πD 4 ∆P f
Q = 8µL = 128µL
c = kRT
where
T = absolute temperature
This shows that the acoustic velocity in an ideal gas depends only on its temperature. The Mach number (Ma) is the ratio of
the fluid velocity to the speed of sound.
V
Ma = c
where
C D ρv 2 A
FD = 2
where
CD = drag coefficient
A = projected area (ft2) of blunt objects such as spheres, ellipsoids, disks, and plates, cylinders, ellipses, and
air foils with axes perpendicular to the flow
The characteristic length in the Reynolds Number (Re) is the length of the plate parallel with the flow. For blunt objects, the
characteristic length is the largest linear dimension (diameter of cylinder, sphere, disk, etc.) that is perpendicular to the flow.
Drag
DragCoefficient
Coefficientfor
forSpheres,
Spheres,Disks,
Disks,and
andCylinders
Cylinders
CD = 24 , Re < 10
Re
100,000
10,000
SPHERES
ρv2A
2FD
1,000
DRAG COEFFICIENT CD =
DISKS
100
CYLINDERS
10
1.0
0.1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Dvρ
REYNOLDS NUMBER Re =
µ
Note: Intermediate divisions are 2, 4, 6, and 8
ΣF = ΣQ2ρ2v2 – ΣQ1ρ1v1
where
ΣQ1ρ1v1 = rate of momentum of the fluid flow entering the control volume in the same direction of the force
ΣQ2ρ2v2 = rate of momentum of the fluid flow leaving the control volume in the same direction of the force
6.2.4.4 Similitude
In order to use a model to simulate the conditions of the prototype, the model must be geometrically, kinematically, and
dynamically similar to the prototype system.
To obtain dynamic similarity between two flow pictures, all independent force ratios that can be written must be the same in
both the model and the prototype. Thus, dynamic similarity between two flow pictures (when all possible forces are acting)
is expressed in the five simultaneous equations below.
FI FI ρv 2 ρv 2
[ FP ] p
[
=
FP]m
=
[P p
=
]
P m [ ]
FI F vl ρ vl ρ
[ ]
= I =
FV p FV m [
µ p ]
=
[
µ m ] [ ]
= [Re ]p = [Re ]m
[ FI
=
]FI
FG p FG m
=
v2
[
lg p]=
v2
[
lg m ] [ ]
= [Fr 2]p = [Fr 2]m
[ FI
]F
= I =
FE p FE m [
ρv 2
Ev p ]
=
[
ρv 2
Ev m ] [
= [Ca]p = [Ca]m
]
FI F ρ lv 2 ρ lv 2
[ ]
= I =
FT p FT m [ ] [ σ p ]=
[
σ m
]
= [We ]p= [We ]m
where the subscripts p and m stand for prototype and model respectively, and
FI = inertia force
FP = pressure force
FV = viscous force
FG = gravity force
FE = elastic force
Re = Reynolds number
We = Weber number
Ca = Cauchy number
Fr = Froude number
l = characteristic length
v = velocity
ρ = density
σ = surface tension
Ev = bulk modulus
µ = dynamic viscosity
P = pressure
where
P0 = stagnation pressure
Ps = static pressure of the fluid at the elevation where the measurement is taken
v2
2g
Ps
v, ps
P0
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, Fig. 11.11, p. 512.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
For a compressible fluid, use the above incompressible fluid equation if the Mach number ≤ 0.3.
where
Cv = coefficient of velocity
P = pressure (lbf/ft2)
γ = ρg (lbf/ft3)
FLOW W
HEAD LOSS
Ha WATER
SURFACE
Hb
.06 H a1.58
* 4
Q 2= for W 0.5 ft
Hb/Ha ≤ 0.6
Q .07 H a1.53
3= for W 0.75 ft
0.026
Q = 4WH 1a.522W for W from 1 through 8 ft Hb/Ha ≤ 0.7
where
H
CREST
L
h BOTTOM
OF CHANNEL
Sharp-Crested Weirs
Q = CLH 3/2
where
C = coefficient of discharge
where
C = coefficient of discharge , 3.33 for rectangular weirs where h becomes negligible (USCS units)
where
Q = discharge (ft3/sec)
BOTTOM h
OF CHANNEL
General V-Notch
where
Q = discharge (ft3/sec)
Cd = coefficient of discharge
h = height of notch vertex with respect to the floor of the approach channel (ft)
where
0.20 ≤ H ≤ 1.24 ft
= 20°
0.64
45°
0.62
60°
Cd
90°
0.60
0.58
0.61
NOTE: AVERAGE VALUES OF Cd IN THE RANGE
0.60 OF VALUES OF h/Ph/H FROM 0.03 TO 0.35
0.35
AND AND P/B FROM
H/L FROM 0.161.04
0.16 TO TO 1.04
VALUE OF Cd
0.59
0.58
0.57
0.56
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
VALUE OF IN DEGREES
Coefficient of Discharge as a Function of Q Chart
Source: U.S. Geological Survey. Discharge Characteristics of Triangular-notch Thin-plate Weirs by John Shen.
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper: 1617-B. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, 1981, Figure 12, p. B29.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1617b/report.pdf.
6.2.6 Orifices
6.2.6.1 Coefficient of Contraction
The cross-sectional area at the vena contracta A2 is characterized by a coefficient of contraction Cc and given by Cc A0.
A1 A0 A2
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, Fig. 11.25, p. 532.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
where
where
Cd = coefficient of discharge or meter coefficient = Cc × Cv
Cc = coefficient of contraction
Cv = flow coefficient
SHARP
ROUNDED SHORT TUBE BORDA
EDGED
where
Cd = coefficient of discharge
P = pressure (lbf/ft2)
Atm
Dt
h1 h
h2
A0 A2
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, Fig. 11.28, p. 535.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
in which h is measured from the liquid surface to the centroid of the orifice opening.
where
Q = flow (ft3/sec)
Cd = coefficient of discharge
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, Fig. 11.27, p. 534.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
in which the product of Cc and Cv is defined as the coefficient of discharge of the orifice
where
v22
Q h1 2g
h3
BOTTOM hg
OF CHANNEL h2
where
Q = flow (ft3/sec)
Cd = coefficient of discharge
6.2.7 Spillways
6.2.7.1 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) Standard Spillway
Q = CLHe3/2
where
Q = discharge (ft3/sec)
C = coefficient of discharge
1.04
CORRECTION FACTOR
1.02 1.2 0.33
0.67
1.00
1.01 1.1
1.00 1.0
3 ON 1
0.99 0.9
3 ON 2
0.98 0.8
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.33 or GREATER
P/Hd 0.7
1.5
0.6 Q CLHe
Ha VELOCITY HEAD
Hd DESIGN TOTAL HEAD
0.5 He ACTUAL TOTAL HEAD
Ha
0.4 He
He / Hd
0.3
P
0.2
0.1
0
0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
C / C0 in which C0 4.03
Discharge Coefficient for the WES Standard Spillway Shape (Chow 1959)
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Open Channel Hydraulics, Sturm, Terry W., 2001, Fig 6.2, p. 203;
permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
ENERGY LINE
Ha
He
Hd
0.115 Hd
(VERTICAL)
P
FLOOR OR
BOTTOM
OF CHANNEL
where
Q = Cd LHd 3/2
where
Hd /P approaches zero
Q = discharge (ft3/sec)
Cd = coefficient of discharge
where
where
C = roughness coefficient
where
Q = flow (cfs)
C = Hazen-Williams coefficient
P = pressure loss per unit length of pipe (psi per foot of pipe)
Q = flow (gpm)
C = Hazen-Williams coefficient
v = velocity (ft/sec)
P1 v12 P2 v 22
+ z +
ρg 1 2g ρg = + z 2 2g + h f + h f, fitting
+
where
v2
h f, fitting = C 2g
v2 =
2g 1 velocity head
Specific fittings have characteristic values of C, which will be provided in the problem statement. A generally accepted
nominal value for head loss in well-streamlined gradual contractions is
v2
hf, fitting = 0.04 2g
V V V V
Source: Bober, W., and Kenyon, R.A., Fluid Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, 1980, Fig. 6-10, p. 297.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research and Development. EPANET 2 Users Manual by Lewis Rossman.
EPA/600/R-00/057. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA, 2000, Table 3.3, p. 32. http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P1007WWU.pdf.
v
P v v v
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982, Fig. 6.3, p. 213.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
Fy – W – P2A2sin α = Qρ (v2sin α – 0)
where
F = force exerted by the bend on the fluid (force exerted by fluid on the bend is equal in magnitude and opposite
− Fy
in sign), Fx and Fy are the x-component and y-component of the force and θ = tan 1 e F o
x
P = internal pressure in the pipe line
where
HR = PS – 20 psi
HF = PS – PR
PS = static pressure
PR = residual pressure
Source: Reproduced with permission of NFPA from NFPA 291, Recommended Practice for Fire Flow Testing and Marking of Hydrants,
2019 edition. Copyright© 2018, National Fire Protection Association. For a full copy of NFPA 291, please go to www.nfpa.org.
where
Q = discharge (gpm)
ϕs = sphericity of particles
∆P = 150v0 µ _1 − ε i + 1.75ρv 0 _1 − ε i
2 2
L kφ 2 D 2 ε 3 kφ D ε 3
s p s p
where
2L
tc =
a
where
∆P = –ρa∆v
where
where
6.3.8 Pump Application and Analysis, Including Wet Wells, Lift Stations, and Cavitation
6.3.8.1 Total Dynamic Pumping Head
TDH = HL + HF + HV
where
η
H
HEAD, H
P
REQUIRED, NPSHR
SUCTION HEAD
EFFICIENCY, η
NET POSITIVE
POWER, P
NPSHR
FLOW RATE, Q
Hpa = atmospheric pressure head on the surface of the liquid in the sump (ft)
Hs = static suction head, height of the surface of the liquid above the centerline of the pump impeller (ft)
where
η = pump efficiency
QγH
BHP =
e 550 ft lbf/ sec o η
-
hp
where
η = pump efficiency
Q H SG
BHP = 3, 956 η
where
η = pump efficiency
Specific Gravity
Fresh water 1.0
Salt water 1.024
Lube oil 0.85
Diesel oil 0.85
QP
BHP = 1, 714 η
where
η = pump efficiency
e 2 2o =e 2 2o
H H
N D 2 N D 1
P P
f p =f 2 2p
ρN 2 D 2 2 ρN D 1
Wo =f W
o
f 3 5p 3 5p
ρN D 2 ρN D 1
where
Wo = power (ft-lbf/sec)
ρ = fluid density (lbf-sec2/ft4)
Subscripts 1 and 2 refer to different but similar machines or to different operating conditions of the same machine.
Hvp = vapor pressure head of the liquid at the operating temperature (ft)
Pvapor = vapor pressure head of the liquid at the operating temperature (ft of liquid, typ.)
Cavitation Parameter
Cavitation can be expected to occur below this critical value of the cavitation parameter in all pumps:
NPSH
σ=
hp
where
σ = cavitation parameter
Q = Q A = Q B = ...
H A + H B + ...
η=
H A /η A + H B /η B + ...
: γQ _ H A + H B + ... i
W= η
where
Q = QA + QB + ...
Q + Q + ...
η = Q /ηA + QB/η + ...
A A B B
: γH `QA + QB + ...j
W= η
where
Qout
Qin
PUMP
Vmin or Hmin
Source: Jensen Precast. "Pump Station Wet Wells: Minimum Storage Volume." Published September 11, 2015.
https://www.jensenprecast.com/news/pump-station-wet-wells-minimum-storage-volume/.
Tmin = recommended minimum cycle time between two consecutive pump starts, including filling time (min)
where
Qout
Qin = 2
S min = D _1 + 2.3Fr i
where
Fr = Froude number
where
L P
v
v v
Source: Vennard, John K., and Robert L. Street, Elementary Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1982 Fig. 9.25, p. 407.
Reproduced with permission of the Licensor through PLSclear.
/ Qin = / Qout
6.3.10.2 Network Head Loss Continuity
Principle: Connected, parallel pipes have equal head losses.
LA v A2 LB v B2
=
hL fA D 2 = fB D 2g
A g B
2 2
πD 2 = πD A + πD B
4 v 4 A v 4 vB
ENERGY LI
NE SLOPE
hf
= Sf
WAT
ER
SUR
FAC
E OR
AH
YDR
AUL v 22
IC G 2
y1 RAD
E LI
2g
W sin NE
SLO
PE
=S
w
W cos
CHAN W
NEL B
OTTOM
SLOPE y2
=S
o
z1
z2
DATUM LINE
α1 v12 α 2 v 22
z1 + y1 + 2g = z 2 + y 2 + 2g + h f
where
hf = frictional loss
Energy coefficients: Used for the average velocity over the depth to compute the total kinetic energy
Integrating the cubed incremental velocities is not equal to the cube of the integrated incremental velocities.
v2 αQ 2
E = α 2g + y = +y
2gA 2
where
E = specific energy
Q = discharge (ft3/sec)
v = velocity (ft/sec)
z = elevation (ft)
y
1
1
yC
αv 2
E= +y
2g
Alternate depths: depths with the same specific energy
y2 =
Critical flow and depth: Occurs when velocity of the water is the same as the speed at which disturbances of free surface
will move through the shallow water
Uniform flow: a flow condition where depth and velocity do not change along a channel
where
A
y = depth of flow = T
Critical flow: Fr = 1
Q = flow (ft3/sec)
where
v = velocity (ft/sec)
M = momentum (ft3)
yc
Mmin M
1.486 2 / 3 1 / 2
v= n RH S
where
Conveyance
Material Manning n
Metal:
Brass 0.01
Copper 0.011
Steel – welded 0.012
Steel – riveted 0.016
Cast iron – coated 0.013
Wrought iron – galvanized 0.016
Corrugated metal (storm drain) 0.024
Nonmetal:
Glass 0.01
Cement 0.011
Closed Conduit or Built-up Cement mortar 0.013
Channel Concrete culvert 0.013
Concrete-lined channel/pipe 0.015
Wood 0.012
Clay 0.013
Brickwork 0.013
Brickwork with cement mortar 0.015
Masonry/rubble masonry 0.025
Sanitary sewer coated with slime 0.013
Asphalt 0.013
Plastic 0.013
PVC 0.009–0.011
Polyethylene 0.009–0.015
Straight and clean 0.022
Winding and sluggish 0.025
Excavated or Dredged Dredged 0.028
Channel Rock cut/stony 0.035
Earth bottom, rubble sides 0.03
Unmaintained/uncut brush 0.08
On plain, clean, straight, no pools 0.03
On plain, clean, winding, some pools 0.04
Natural Streams On plain, sluggish, weedy, deep pools 0.07
On mountain, few boulders 0.04
On mountain, large boulders 0.05
where
v = velocity in channel
Q = flow in channel
RH = hydraulic radius
where
C = Chezy's resistance coefficient (ft 0 5 /sec)
RH = slope of hydraulic surface (ft/ft)
k = unit conversion factor
= 1 (SI units)
= 1.486 (USCS units)
n = Manning's roughness coefficient (ft –1/3/sec)
0.6 DISCHARGE, Q
HYDRAULIC
0.5 MANNING’S, n RADIUS, R
VELOCITY, V
v
0.4
0.3
AREA, A
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3
Source: American Society of Civil Engineers. Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers. Reston, VA: ASCE, 1970, pg. 87, fig. 24.
where
Depth y is constant.
Q = flow (ft3/sec)
S = slope (ft/ft)
Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius Top Width Hydraulic Depth Section Factor
Section
A P R T D Z
T
by
y by b + 2y b y by1.5
b b + 2y
RECTANGLE
T
( b + zy ) y ( b + zy ) y
1.5
( b + zy ) y
1 z
1 y (b + zy)y b + 2 y 1 + z2 b + 2zy
z
b b + 2 y 1 + z2 b + 2 zy b + 2 zy
TRAPEZOID
T
zy 2 zy 2.5
1 1 y zy2 2 y 1 + z2 2zy 1/2y
z z
2 1 + z2 2
TRIANGLE
T ( sin 1/2 θ ) d0
( θ − sin )1.5
d0
θ
y 1/8(θ – sin θ)d0 2
1/2θd0
1/4 1 −
sin θ
θ 0
d or
(
1/8 θ − sin θ d0
sin 1/2 θ
( 2
32 ( sin 1 2 θ )0.5
d0 2.5
CIRCLE
2 y ( d0 − y )
T
* *
y2 2T 2 y 3 A
y
2/3Ty T+8 2 y 2/3y 2/9 6 Ty1.5
PARABOLA 3 T 3T 2 + 8 y 2
( π2 − 2) r + (b + 2r ) y ( π 2 − 2 ) r 2 + ( b + 2r ) y 1.5
r r y
2
( π − 2) r + b + 2 y b + 2r
( π 2 − 2) r 2 ( π 2 − 2 ) r 2 + ( b + 2r ) y
+y
ROUND-CORNERED
b
RECTANGLE (y > r)
( π − 2) r + b + 2 y b + 2r b + 2r
T
T 2 − r 2 1 − z cot −1 z T 1 + z 2 − 2r 1 − z cot −1 z A A
( ) ( ) 2 z ( y − r ) + r 1 + z2 A A
1 r 1 y
z z
ROUND-BOTTOMED 4z z z z P T T
TRIANGLE
*Satisfactory approximation for the interval 0 < x ≤ 1, where x = 4y/T. When x > 1, use the exact expression P = (T/2) 1 + x 2 + 1/ x ln x + 1 + x 2 .
( )
Source: Chow, Ven Te. Open-Channel Hydraulics. Estate of Ven Te Chow, 1959, Table 2-1, p. 21.
y 1 3 2 3
b5 y5
> 2H
by1.5 d cn
Z
b `b + 2yj b
RECTANGLE
0.135
Z c4
1 1 y 0.81 > 1.5 2.5
H − b
30z
z z z b
b Q
for 0.1 1 2.5 1 0.4
TRAPEZOID b
1 3
z 5 y8
1 1 y > H
z z 4 _1 + z 2i
TRIANGLE
1.01 0.5
1 >_θ − sin θi d0 H
d0 5 3 1 3 Z
y d00.26 c
16 2θ 2
y
for 0.02 # dc # 0.85
0
CIRCLE
θ is in radians
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill. From "Hydraulics for Excess Water Management" by Ben C. Yen in
Water Resources Handbook, edited by Larry W. Mays, 1996. Permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Semicircle π 2 py 1 2y π π 2.5
2y 2y 4y 4y
Parabola, 1 2
y y
2 3
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill. From "Hydraulics for Excess Water Management" by Ben C. Yen in
Water Resources Handbook, edited by Larry W. Mays, 1996. Permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Mild M yn > yc
Steep S yn < yc
Critical C yn = yc
Horizontal H yn = ∞
Adverse A S0 < 0
Type 2: Actual depth is between yc and yn; flow can be either subcritical or supercritical.
Type 3: Actual depth is less than both yc and yn; flow is supercritical.
HORIZONTAL
H1
CDL
H2
yc
C2
NDL
CDL
M1 HORIZONTAL
CRITICAL SLOPE
M2 NDL
yo
yc CDL
M3
yc
A2
S1 HORIZONTAL
ADVERSE SLOPE
CDL
S2
S3
NDL
STEEP SLOPE
where
where
∆E
E1
E2
v2
y2
Q
y1
v1
where
Fr = Froude number
v = velocity (ft/sec)
where
Fr1 = 1.0–1.7
1 2
Weak Jumps - Low energy dissipation rate - Smooth downstream water surface
where
y2 V2
V1 y1 Fr 1 = 1.7–2.5
where
Fr 1 = 2.5–4.5
Steady Jumps - Jump forms steadily at same location and is well balanced - Turbulence is confined within the jump
where
Fr 1 = 4.5–9.0
Strong Jumps - Large change in depth of the water surface - High energy dissipation rate
where
Fr 1 = 9.0 and higher
Source: Chow, Ven Te. Open-Channel Hydraulics. Estate of Ven Te Chow, 1959, Table 15.2, p. 395.
v12
E=
1 y1 +
2g
where
Fr = Froude number
v = velocity (ft/sec)
`1 + 8 Fr12 j − 4Fr12 + 1
3 /2
E2
= 1 − TE =
E1 E1 8 Fr 2 `2 + Fr 2 j
1 1
M1 M1
NDL
S2 y01
NDL NDL
y01 yc
y02 M2 S2
STEEP S3
CDL y02
MILD yc (VERY
LONG STE
) EP CDL
ER
MILDER NDL
(VERY LONG)
NDL M2
RESERVOIR
y01
yc S2 H
MILD y02 yc
S2
CDL
ST CDL NDL
EE STEEP
P NDL
RESERVOIR RESERVOIR
M1 TAILWATER
M2
H yc H
y0 y0
NDL NDL
MILD CDL MILD CDL
(VERY
LO NG) (SHORT
)
FREE yc
OVERFALL
where
H = depth of flow
yn = normal depth
yc = critical depth
h
Partially H TW
Type 1 Steep No No Inlet
Filled D V
TYPE 1
HW
h
H TW
Partially yn
Type 2 Mild No No Outlet D V
Filled
TYPE 2
HW
h
Partially H
Type 3 Mild No No Outlet
Filled TW
TYPE 3
where
HW
h
Type 4 Any Full Yes Yes Outlet H
yn yc
TYPE 4
HW
h
H
Type 5 Any Full Yes No Outlet yc yn
1.4 yc
TYPE 5
HW
h
TYPE 6
where
Type 1 Flow
where
Type 2 Flow
2 g ∆h
Q=A
fL
+ ke + 1
4R
where f = Darcy-Weisbach approach friction factor
Type 3 Flow
Q = Cd A 2 gh
where
Cd = coefficient of discharge
h = vertical distance from the centroid of the culvert entrance to the water surface at the entrance (ft)
Type 4 Flow
v2
=Q Ac 2 g ∆h + 1 − hi − h f
2g
where
Type 5 Flow
v2
=Q Ac 2 g ∆h + 1 − hi
2g
Type 6 Flow
v12
=Q A 2 g ∆h + − hi − h f
2g
where
vu2
2g
He
EGL Hf HL
HGL Ho
Hu v2
2g vd2
2g
Hd
LS
SECTION 1 SECTION 2
v2 v2
Hu + LS + 2gu = Hd + 2gd + HL
where
He = ke e 2g o
v2
where
Ku n 2 L v 2
H f = f1 + ke + p
R 1.33 2g
H
where
V 2 − V u2
H g = 1.5 f g p
2g
W v2
H g = K g X f u p sin θ g
2g
where
or
HWi Hc Ku Q M
= + K> H + KS S up to Q/AD 0.5 = 3.5
D D AD 0.5
where
HWi Ku Q 2
= c> H + Y + KS S when Q/AD 0.5 = 4.0
D AD 0.5
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, p. A.1 and A.2.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed. FHWA-HIF-12-026.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Table A.2, p. A.9.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
Constants for Inlet Control Equations for South Dakota Concrete Box (HY-8 User Manual and Table 11 of FHWA 2006)
Wingwall Top Top Corner Equation Unsubmerged Unsubmerged Submerged Submerged
Sketch RCB Inlet Configuration
Flare Bevel Radius Fillet Form K M c Y
1 30° 45° – – Single barrel 2 0.44 0.74 0.040 0.48
2 30° 45° – 6 in. Multiple barrel (2, 3, and 4 cells) 2 0.47 0.68 0.04 0.62
3 30° 45° – – Single barrel (2:1 to 4:1 span-to-rise ratio) 2 0.48 0.65 0.041 0.57
4 30° 45° – – Multiple barrels (15° skewed headwall) 2 0.69 0.49 0.029 0.95
Multiple barrels (30° to 45° skewed
5 30° 45° – – 2 0.69 0.49 0.027 1.02
headwall)
6 0° none – – Single barrel, top edge 90° 2 0.55 0.64 0.047 0.55
7 0° 45° – 6 in. Single barrel (0 to 6 in. corner fillets) 2 0.56 0.62 0.045 0.55
8 0° 45° – 6 in. Multiple barrels (2, 3, and 4 cells) 2 0.55 0.59 0.038 0.69
9 0° 45° – – Single barrels (2:1 to 4:1 span-to-rise ratio) 2 0.61 0.57 0.041 0.67
10 0° – 8 in. 6 in. Single barrel (0 and 6 in. fillets) 2 0.56 0.62 0.038 0.67
11 0° – 8 in. 12 in. Single barrel (12 in. corner fillets) 2 0.56 0.62 0.038 0.67
12 0° – 8 in. 12 in. Multiple barrels (2, 3, and 4 cells) 2 0.55 0.6 0.023 0.96
13 0° – 8 in. 12 in. Single barrel (2:1 to 4:1 span-to-rise ratio) 2 0.61 0.57 0.033 0.79
Sketches are shown in the HY-8 documentation and research report. Since sketches 2 and 8 show fillets, a 6 in. fillet is assumed.
12 in.
Sketches 1 through 5 Sketches 7 through 13
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed. FHWA-HIF-12-026.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Table A.3, p. A.10.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
CURB
d
Sx
PAVEMENT
Ku S 0L.5 8/3
Q= n d
Sx
0.375
Qn
T=f p
Ku S 1x.67 S 0L.5
where
v = velocity (ft/sec)
T1 T2
d
S x2
S x1 Q2
PAVEMENT
CURB
Q1
0.375 RS VW0.375
Q1 n SS Q2 n WW
T = T1 + T2 = > H + SS 1.67 WW
0.56S 0.5 S 1x.167 SS`0.56S S x2 j WW
0 .5
T X
Q 2Q
v= = 2
A T S + T 2S
1 x1 2 x2
d = T2 S x2
Pipe, Concrete
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Table C.2, p. C.6.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
180 10,000
EXAMPLE (1) (2) (3)
168 8,000
6
156 D = 42 in. (3.5 ft) 6
6,000
Q = 120 cfs
144 5,000 5
6 5
4,000 HW * HW
132 D (ft)
3,000 5 4
(1) 2.5 8.8 4
120 (2) 2.1 7.4
2,000 4
(3) 2.2 7.7 3
108 3
*D IN FEET
96 3
1,000
800
84 2
600 2
500
2
60 200 1.5
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
54
DIAMETER OF CULVERT D (in.)
100
48
80
60 1.0
42 1.0
50 HW ENTRANCE 1.0
40 D SCALE TYPE
0.9 0.9
36 SQUARE EDGE
30 (1)
WITH HEADWALL 0.9
33
20 (2) GROOVE END
WITH HEADWALL 0.8 0.8
30
0.8
(3) GROOVE END
27 PROJECTING
10
0.7
24 8 0.7 0.7
6
5 TO USE SCALE (2) OR (3),
21 PROJECT HORIZONTALLY TO
4
SCALE (1), THEN USE STRAIGHT 0.6
0.6 0.6
3 INCLINED LINE THROUGH D AND
18
Q SCALES, OR REVERSE AS
2 ILLUSTRATED.
15
0.5
0.5
1.0 0.5
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Chart 1B, p. C.9.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
180 10,000
(1)
168 8,000 EXAMPLE
156 6,000 D = 36 in. (3.0 ft) (2)
6
5,000 Q = 66 cfs
144 (3)
4,000 5 6
HW * HW
132 3,000 D (ft) 6
5
54
100
DIAMETER OF CULVERT D (in.)
48 80
60
1.0 1.0
42 50
40 1.0
0.9 0.9
36 30 HW ENTRANCE
SCALE
D TYPE 0.9
33 20 (1) HEADWALL 0.8
0.8
STANDARD C.M.
30
MITERED TO 0.8
(2)
CONFORM TO SLOPE
27 10 0.7
(3) PROJECTING 0.7
8
24 0.7
6
5 TO USE SCALE (2) OR (3), PROJECT
21 4 HORIZONTALLY TO SCALE (1), 0.6
THEN USE STRAIGHT INCLINED 0.6
3 LINE THROUGH D AND Q SCALES, 0.6
18 OR REVERSE AS
2 ILLUSTRATED.
15 0.5 0.5
1.0 0.5
12
HEADWATER DEPTH FOR
C.M. PIPE CULVERTS
WITH INLET CONTROL
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
JANUARY 1963
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Chart 2B, p. C.11.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
2
4.0'
3.5'
3.0' dc CANNOT
CAN NOTEXCEED
EXCEEDTOP
TOPOF
OFPIPE
PIPE
1 2.5'
2.0'
1.5'
1.0' DIA.
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
6 8
5 7
9'
4 6
CRITICAL DEPTH dc (ft)
8'
8'
dc CAN
CANNOT
NOTEXCEED
EXCEEDTOP
TOPOF
OFPIPE
PIPE
3 5
7'
6'
5'
2 4' DIA.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
14
12
10
dc CAN NOTEXCEED
CANNOT EXCEEDTOP
TOPOF
OFPIPE
PIPE
15'
6
13'
11'
9' DIA.
4
1000 2000 3000 4000
0
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS
JAN 1964 CRITICAL DEPTH
CIRCULAR PIPE
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Chart 4B, p. C.5.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
2,000
H
HW
h0
0.4
TURNING
SLOPE S0
LINE
1,000 SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLOWING FULL 0.5
800 0.6
120
300
72
66
PLE
50
AM 2
EX
LE
200 60
NG
10
TH
54
L
0
HEAD H (ft)
50
(ft
D = 48 L = 110 20 3
)
48 ke = 0.5
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
0
10
0
100
0 42 0 30
20 4
= 7
Q
DIAMETER D (in.)
80 0
30
0 40 5
36
60 6
33
40
0 500
50
30
40 500 8
k e=
k e=
27
0.2
10
0.5
30 24
21
20
18 20
10 15
6 12
HEAD FOR
CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.012
BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS JAN. 1963 WHERE HW/D IS BETWEEN 0.5 TO 3.0
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Chart 5B, p. C.17.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
2,000
H 0.4
TURNING
HW
1,000
LINE
H0 0.5
800
SLOPE S0 0.6
120 SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLOWING FULL
600
500 108 0.8
400 96 1.0
300 k
84 0. e
25
0. 50
72 5
200
LE
66 0.
NG
9 0
10 2
TH
60
L(
50
ft)
54
HEAD H (ft)
100
DISCHARGE Q (cfs)
0 3
10
DIAMETER D (in.)
48
80 1 2 0
L= 20
0
0.9
60
42 k e= 4
0
50
36 20 5
40
33 300 6
Q = 35
EXAMPLE
30 H = 7.5
30 27 300
D= 8
27
400
20 10
24 400
500
21
500
10 18
8 20
6 15
5
4
12
3 HEAD FOR
STANDARD
2
C.M. PIPE CULVERTS
FLOWING FULL
n = 0.024
WHERE HW/D IS BETWEEN 0.5 TO 3.0
Source: Federal Highway Administration. Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts: Hydraulic Design Series Number 5. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-12-026. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2012, Chart 6B, p. C.19.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/12026/hif12026.pdf.
6.5 Hydrology
6.5.1 Storm/Flood Frequency Probabilities
6.5.1.1 General Probability
ni
p= N
where
P _ x $ xT i= p= T
1
where
x = magnitude of event
1 n
P _ x $ xT at least once in n years i = p = 1 − c1 − T m
where
n = number of years
1 n
P _ x 1 xT each year for n years i = p = c1 − T m
where
f _ k; n, p i = n C k p k `1 − p j
n−k
where
n = number of trials
= C kn = n!
n Ck
k! _ n − k i !
6.5.1.6 Simplified Flood Frequency Equation
xT = x + KT s
where
where
C = runoff coefficient
tc = time of concentration, which is the time required for the runoff to travel from the hydraulically most
distant point of the watershed to the point of interest (min)
Multiple watersheds may require summation of times to determine an overall time for the system.
A1 C1 + A 2 C 2 + ... A n C n
Cw =
A1 + A 2 + ... A n
1, 000
S = CN − 10
1, 000
CN = S + 10
where
P = precipitation (in.)
CN = curve number
Loss
Loss (in.) = P – Q
2
( S + I ) − I a
a
= P
Ia S
1− +
P P
As P becomes increasingly large,
Loss (in.) = S + Ia
where
0.2S
where
qu = 10 C 0 C1 log t c C 2 _ c i
2
+ + log t
where
Group C: Clay loams, shallow sandy loam, soils low in organic content, and soils usually high in clay
Group D: Soils that swell significantly when wet, heavy plastic clays, and certain saline soils
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Highway Hydrology: Hydraulic Design Series Number 2. 2nd ed.
FHWA-HIF-02-001. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Transportation, October 2002, Table 6.10, p. 6-59.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/library_arc.cfm?pub_number=2&id=7.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Highway Hydrology: Hydraulic Design Series Number 2. 2nd ed.
FHWA-HIF-02-001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, October 2002, Table 5-4, pp. 5-22 through 5-24.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/library_arc.cfm?pub_number=2&id=7.
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Highway Hydrology: Hydraulic Design Series Number 2. 2nd ed.
FHWA-HIF-02-001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, October 2002, Table 5-5, p. 5-28.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/library_arc.cfm?pub_number=2&id=7.
160 6.30 0.48 0.39 0.32 0.26 0.21 0.17 0.14 0.11 + + + +
170 6.69 0.45 0.37 0.30 0.24 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.10 + + + +
180 7.09 0.42 0.34 0.28 0.23 0.19 0.15 0.12 + + + + +
190 7.48 0.40 0.33 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.11 + + + + +
200 7.87 0.38 0.31 0.25 0.21 0.17 0.14 0.11 + + + + +
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Urban Drainage Design Manual: Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-10-009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, September 2009, revised August 2013, Table 3-8, p. 3-24.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf.
q = αA m when S f = S0
1.486 1/2
α= N S 0 where m = 5/3 for wide flow plane
where
Q = discharge (cfs)
α = kinematic wave routing parameter for a particular cross-sectional shape, slope, and roughness (ft2/sec)/ftm
m = kinematic wave routing parameter for a particular cross-sectional shape, slope, and roughness (ft2/sec)/ftm
1.41 S10/2
Triangular cross section 1.33 Width at 1-ft depth
n _Pci
1/3
Source: Miller, Jeffery E. Basic Concepts of Kinematic-Waver Models: Paper 1302. Washington DC: U.S. Geological Survey, 1984, p. 27.
https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1302/report.pdf.
Time to Equilibrium
nL
tc =
1.49 S 10/2 h 2/3
where
tc = time (sec)
where
a = regression constant
b, c, d = regression coefficients
A, B, C = basin characteristics
Urban Equations
2.04
UQ 2 2.35 A 0.41
= s SL
0.17
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.65 (13 − BDF )−0.32 IAs0.15 RQ 20.47
1.86
UQ5 2.70 A 0.35
= s SL
0.16
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.59 (13 − BDF )−0.31 IAs0.11RQ50.54
1.75
UQ10 2.99 A 0.32
= s SL
0.15
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.57 (13 − BDF )−0.30 IAs0.09 RQ100.58
1.76
UQ 25 = 2.78 A 0.31
s SL
0.15
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.55 (13 − BDF )−0.29 IAs0.07 RQ 250.60
1.74
UQ50 2.67 A 0.29
= s SL
0.15
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.53 (13 − BDF )−0.28 IAs0.06 RQ500.62
1.76
UQ100 2.50 A 0.29
= s SL
0.15
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.52 (13 − BDF )−0.28 IAs0.06 RQ1000.63
1.86
UQ500 = 2.27 A 0.29
s SL
0.16
( RI 2 + 3) ( ST + 8)−0.54 (13 − BDF )−0.27 IAs0.05 RQ5000.63
where
SL = main channel slope (measured between points that are 10% and 85% of main channel length upstream of
site) (ft/mi)
ST = basin storage (percentage of basin occupied by lakes, reservoirs, swamps, and wetlands) (percent)
BDF = basin development factor (a measure of the hydraulic efficiency of the basin)
c
i Equation 1
Tde f
cT m
i Equation 2
Td f
cT m
i Equation 3
Tde f
where
m = rainfall coefficient
c, e, f = return-period coefficients
5
tc = 3 t L
where
where
n = roughness coefficient
t = ti + ts
where
t = time of concentration
ti = C(L/S i2)1/3
where
C = coefficient
1 in. OR 1 mm OF
PRECIPITATION EXCESS
IN PERIOD
INTENSITY
RAINFALL
D tc
tlag
DISCHARGE
L (INFLECTION POINT)
UNIT
qp HYDROGRAPH
TIME
tp tr
T
Q = 2 q p T = 2 q p `t p + t r j
1 1
where
tp = time to peak
tr = time to recession
tc = time of concentration
tlag
1/3 W50 2/3 W50
W75
0.75 qp
W50
0.50 qp
TIME, T (hr)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Urban Drainage Design Manual: Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-10-009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, September 2009, revised August 2013, Table 3-16, p. 3-26.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf.
where
tlag = lag time from the centroid of the unit rainfall excess to the peak of the unit hydrograph (hr)
W50, W75 = time width of unit hydrograph at discharge equal to 50% and 75% (hr)
L = stream distance from the outlet to the upstream limits of the basin (mi)
Lc = stream distance from the outlet to a point opposite the basin centroid (mi)
tpR = lag time from midpoint of duration tr to the peak of the unit hydrograph (hr)
tr = duration of rainfall excess other than standard duration adopted in the study (hr)
0.9 D
0.7
HYDROGRAPH
0.6
0.5 tc qp
tc TRIANGULAR UNIT HYDROGRAPH
0.4
0.3
POINT OF
0.2 INFLECTION CURVILINEAR UNIT HYDROGRAPH
0.1
0 1 2 3 4 5
tp tr
tb
TIME, T (hr)
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Urban Drainage Design Manual: Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-10-009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, September 2009, revised August 2013, Table 3-7, p. 3-32.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf.
K p Am QD
qp =
tp
where
qp = peak flow (ft3/sec)
Time to peak:
©2021 NCEES 403
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
2
t p = 3 tc
αl K p A k Q D
qp = tc
where
L0.8 _ S + 1 i
0.7
tc =
1, 140Y 0.5
L
tc = 3, 600v
where
tL = time lag from the center of mass of the rainfall excess to peak discharge (hr)
L = length (ft)
v = velocity (ft/sec)
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
S
ION
0.40
EG
NR
DS
0.30
TAI
LAN
UN
S
MO
OD
OW
0.20
WO
AD
RN
ME
STE
ND
D, A
AY
WE
DH
PPE
NS
AN
L FA
RO
0.10
SLOPE (ft/ft)
ER
0.09
P-C
VIA
ITT
0.08
LLU
R
DL
IES
0.07
T
RS
DA
UN
ULL
0.06
S
RE
RO
RO
OP
AN
DG
STU
0.05
YG
CR
OU
W ) ;
LAN
A
T
EAV
OW
O
0.04
P
N
AYS
L
CO
UP
DF
SS
TR
HH
W
A
ALL
,
LAN
ION
IGH
0.03
R
GR
WIT
ATE
SM
RT-
ER
VAT
RA
ST
W
(OV
ND
HO
T
LTI
RE
ED
TA
0.02
S
TED
CU
FO
LED
ASS
EN
E
IVA
TIL
GR
AG
EM
ULT
UN
ILL
PAV
C
MT
ND
EA
IMU
0.01
BAR
MIN
LY
AR
NE
0.005
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
15
20
VELOCITY (ft/s)
1.0
PROPOSED 30
0.8
FLOW Q (m3/s)
FLOW Q (ft3/sec)
0.6
20
EXISTING
0.4
10
0.2
0 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
TIME t (hr)
USGS Nationwide Urban Hydrograph for Existing (Unimproved) and Proposed (Improved) Conditions
Source: Federal Highway Administration. National Highway Institute. Urban Drainage Design Manual: Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. 3rd ed.
FHWA-HIF-10-009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, September 2009, revised August 2013, Table 3-9, p. 3-39.
www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf.
I t1 It 2 Ot1 Ot 2 R Ot 2 Ot1
2 2 t
Ot 2 CI t 2 1 C Ot1 when It1 = It 2
2 t
C
2R t
Linear Reservoir:
St = ROt
where
t = time (time)
C = dimensionless
where
K = recession constant
n = number of intervals
3. Areas between successive isohyets are computed and multiplied by the numerical average of two contour
(isohyets) values.
4. The sum of the previous calculation divided by the drainage area provides the weighted average precipitation.
Td + 20
P = 100
60P
i= T
d
where
P = precipitation (in.)
n = number of gauges
Normal-Ratio Method
n
Px = /Wi Pi
i=1
where
n = number of stations
or
Px 1 n Pi
=
Ax n Ai
/
i=1
Y
FOR GAUGE IN QUESTION (in.)
CUMULATIVE PRECIPITATION
∆X2
∆X1 S2 ∆Y2
S1 ∆Y1
∆Yi
Si = when plotting the change in cumulative catch of a questionable gauge (Yi) against the cumulative catch
∆X i
of surrounding gauges that are not in question (Xi).
where
∆Xi = change in cumulative catch for the sum of the regulated gauges between end points
and
S2
y1 = Yi
S1
where
S2
= adjustment factor
S1
y1 = adjusted series for gauge i
where
P = precipitation
Es = surface evaporation
Ts = transpiration
I = infiltration
where
Kt = 0.0173tm – 0.314
6.5.8.3 Evaporation
Pan Method
EL = K p E p
where
Kp = pan coefficient
Aerodynamic Method
Ea = M _es - e i uz
where
Ea = evaporation (length/time)
where
6.5.8.4 Porosity
volume of voids
η=
total volume
where η = porosity, 0.25 < η < 0.40
6.5.8.6 Infiltration
Richards Equation
dθ = 2 c dh dθ m − dK
K
dt 2z dθ dz dz
where
Horton Model
f = ` f0 − fc j e kt + fc
−
where
f0 − fc
F = fc t p + ` −kt p j
k 1−e
where
3.0
2.8
2.6
Green-Ampt Equation
Z + h0 + S z
f=K Z
where
where
θi = initial soil moisture content
η = porosity
F = Z Δθ
S z K ∆θ
Fp = i − K for t = t p
Fp
tp = i
where
2.5
2
INFILTRATION RATE (in./hr)
RAIN INTENSITY
1 INFILTRATION
RATE CURVE (f )
0.5 F
0
0 5 10 15 20 t 25 30 35
F TIME (hr)
tp = —p
i
6.5.9 Stormwater Management (e.g., Detention Ponds, Retention Ponds, Infiltration Systems, and Swales)
6.5.9.1 Detention and Retention
Rational Method
Vin = iΣACt
Vout = Q0 t
where
t = time (min)
Routing Equation
1 _ I + I 2 i + c S − 1 O ∆t m = c S 2 + 1 O 2 ∆t m
∆t
2 1 1 2 1 2
where
I = inflow (volume/time)
O = outflow (volume/time)
S = storage (volume/time)
_ I1 + I 2 i + d
2S
− O1 n = 2 + O 2
2S1
∆t ∆t
6.5.9.2 Erosion
Estimation of Wave Heights Based on Surface Winds
Estimated Wind Speed at 30 feet above Water Surface:
1 /7
U = U z c 10
z
m
where
Ut
= − for 3,600 sec < t < 36,000 sec
U3,600 1.5334 0.15 log10 t
#
where
1.5
Ut /U3600 = 1.277 + 0.296 tanh [0.9 log10 (45/t)]
1.4
RATIO Ut /U3600
1.3
1.2
1.1
Ratio of Wind Speed of Any Duration Ut to the 1-hr Wind Speed U3,600
Source: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Coastal Engineering Manual. EM 1110-2-1100 (Part II). Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Army, Change 4, September 2015, Table II-2-1, p. II-2-4.
https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1100_Part-02.pdf?ver=2016-02-11-153511-290.
140 63
130 58.5
120 54
110 t = 3600 / Uf (miles/hr) 49.5
t = 1609 / Uf (meters/sec)
Uf (miles/hr)
100 45
Uf (m/s)
90 40.5
80 36
70 31.5
60 27
50 22.5
40 18
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
DURATION TIME t (sec)
Duration of the Fastest-Mile Wind Speed Uf as a Function of Wind Speed (for Open Terrain Conditions)
Source: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Coastal Engineering Manual. EM 1110-2-1100 (Part II). Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of the Army, Change 4, September 2015, Table II-2-2, p. II-2-5.
https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_1110-2-1100_Part-02.pdf?ver=2016-02-11-153511-290.
UA = 0.71U1.23
F = fetch (ft)
where
S = slope steepness
Values of the Topographic Factor, LS, for Specific Combinations of Slope Length and Steepness1
Percent Slope Length (ft)
slope 25 50 75 100 150 200 300 400 500 600 800 1,000
0.2 0.060 0.069 0.075 0.080 0.086 0.092 0.099 0.105 0.110 0.114 0.121 0.126
0.5 0.073 0.083 0.090 0.096 0.104 0.110 0.119 0.126 0.132 0.137 0.145 0.152
0.8 0.086 0.098 0.107 0.113 0.123 0.130 0.141 0.149 0.156 0.162 0.171 0.179
2 0.133 0.163 0.185 0.201 0.227 0.248 0.280 0.305 0.326 0.344 0.376 0.402
3 0.190 0.233 0.264 0.287 0.325 0.354 0.400 0.437 0.466 0.492 0.536 0.573
4 0.230 0.303 0.357 0.400 0.471 0.528 0.621 0.697 0.762 0.820 0.920 1.01
5 0.268 0.379 0.464 0.536 0.656 0.758 0.928 1.07 1.20 1.31 1.52 1.69
6 0.336 0.476 0.583 0.673 0.824 0.952 1.17 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.90 2.13
8 0.496 0.701 0.859 0.992 1.21 1.41 1.72 1.98 2.22 2.43 2.81 3.14
10 0.685 0.968 1.19 1.37 1.68 1.94 2.37 2.74 3.06 3.36 3.87 4.33
12 0.903 1.28 1.56 1.80 2.21 2.55 3.13 3.61 4.04 4.42 5.11 5.71
14 1.15 1.62 1.99 2.30 2.81 3.25 3.98 4.59 5.13 5.62 6.49 7.26
16 1.42 2.01 2.46 2.84 3.48 4.01 4.92 5.68 6.35 6.95 8.03 8.98
18 1.72 2.43 2.97 3.43 4.21 3.86 5.95 6.87 7.68 8.41 9.71 10.9
20 2.04 2.88 3.53 4.08 5.00 5.77 7.07 8.16 9.12 10.0 11.5 12.9
= ^λ/72.6 h _65.41 sin 2 θ + 4.56 sin θ + 0.065 i
1 LS m
where
λ = slope length (ft)
m = 0.2 for gradients < 1 percent, 0.3 for 1 to 3 percent slopes, 0.4 for 3.5 to 4.5 percent slopes, 0.5 for 5 percent slopes and steeper
θ = angle of slope
(For other combinations of length and gradient, interpolate between adjacent values)
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning.
Agricultural Handbook Number 537. Washington, DC: USDA, 1978, Table 3, p. 12.
https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/50201000/USLEDatabase/ah_537.pdf.
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning.
Agricultural Handbook Number 537. Washington, DC: USDA, 1978, Table 9, p. 31.
https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/64080530/RUSLE/AH_537.pdf.
Tall weeds or short brush with 50 G 0.26 0.13 0.07 0.035 0.012 0.003
average drop fall height of 20 in. W 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.076 0.039 0.011
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning.
Agricultural Handbook Number 537. Washington, DC: USDA, 1978, Table 10, p. 32.
https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/64080530/RUSLE/AH_537.pdf.
50 50
20
20 35
35 20 20
35 35
35
20 75
20 <20
35 100
<35
20 20
<35
75
35 50
75 125
20
<20 >50
50 150
20 75 100
>50 100 125 175
>20 150 200
<20
<20
175
150
175 250
50 200 200
300
20 35
<20 350
>50
250
50 20
>50
>50
20 50 250 300
50
300 300
<20
50 20 350
20 400
35
50 350
400
75 400
50
75
50 450
500
550
450
500
75 550
450
where
Eg = evaporation
Tg = transpiration
I = infiltration
6.6.2 Aquifers
6.6.2.1 Darcy's Law
dh
Q = − KA
dx
where
dh
q = − K dx
where
q − K dh
v = S = S dx
y y
where
Sy = effective porosity
Transmissivity, T: The product of hydraulic conductivity and thickness, b, of the aquifer (L2T –1):
T = Kb
Storativity or storage coefficient of an aquifer, S: The volume of water taken into or released from storage per unit surface
area per unit change in potentiometric (piezometric) head.
η = porosity
r1
PERMEABLE SOIL
h2
h1
BOTTOM OF AQUIFER
IMPERMEABLE
Dupuit's Formula
πK `h 22 − h12 j
Q=
ln d r n
r2
1
where
h2 = height of water surface above bottom of aquifer at distance r2 from well centerline (ft)
where
S = Sy + Ssb
where
Sy >> Ssb
Sy = specific yield
n = Sy + Sr
where
n = porosity
Sy = specific yield
Sr = specific retention
Vyield
Sy = V
total
where
Sy = specific yield
Vyield = volume of water removed in unit area with unit drawdown (ft2-ft)
AQUITARD
H TOP OF AQUIFER
h1 h2
PERMEABLE SOIL b
r1
r2
BOTTOM OF AQUIFER
IMPERMEABLE
T = Kb = transmissivity (ft2/sec)
Cooper-Jacob Equations
Q Q 2
s = 4πT ln 2 = 4πT f − 0.5772 − ln e r S op
2.25Tt
rw S 4Tt
s = 4rT log d 2 n
2.303Q 2.25Tt
r S
where
s = drawdown (ft)
2.3Q ∆ _log ti
T = 4π ∆s
2.25Tto
S=
r2
where
q = Q
b
where
/ : Kbi bi D
n
Kx =
i=1
where
PUMPED
STATIC WATER TABLE WELL
WATER TABLE
b r1 TEST
WELL
r2
πDη 2
t= ` − 2j
Q r 2 r1
where
r2 = radial distance at the boundary from which the time of travel is to be computed (ft)
D = thickness of the confined aquifer b or average saturated thickness between radial measuring points r1 and r2 (ft)
η = porosity
st = s a + s w
where
Continuity equation = Q = vA
where
M = mass
Min = mass in
r = reaction rate = kC n
1
k = reaction rate constant f p
^concentration units hn 1 # time
−
n = order of reaction
C = concentration (mass/volume)
Q = flow rate
V = volume
v = velocity
where
MGD = million gallons per day
6.7.2.1 Advection
Jadv = ne v C
where
ne = effective porosity
where
x = distance (L)
6.7.2.3 Dispersion
Jdisp = Dh dC/dx
where
x = distance (L)
Dh = De + Dmech
where
Dmech = αv
where
f = fraction of seeded dilution water volume in sample to volume of seeded dilution water in seed control
where
DOb,t = dissolved oxygen concentration in blank after t days in incubation (mg/L)
where
k = 2.30K
t = time (days)
©2021 NCEES 432
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
kT = k20 (θ)T – 20
Reaeration θ = 1.024
where
θ = temperature coefficient
BODr = amount of waste remaining at time t (days) expressed in oxygen equivalents (mg/L)
t = time (day)
` kr − kd j WWW
RS V
tc = − ln SS f1 − D a pW
1 SS k r
kr kd S kd k d La WW
S W
T X
DO = DOsat – D
where
t = time (days)
where
Source: Calculated by G.C. Whipple and M.C. Whipple from measurements of C.J.J. Fox.
Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 33, 1911, p. 362.
Source: Colt, J., "Computation of Dissolved Gas Concentrations in Water as Functions of Temperature, Salinity and Pressure,"
American Fisheries Society Special Publication 14, 1984, American Fisheries Society. Used with permission.
Oxygen Consumption
L0
BODt
Lt
L REMAINING
TIME
SATURATION
DOS
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (DO)
INITIAL DEFICIT
DO0 DEFICIT
0
0 xc
DISTANCE x
D = DOstream − DO
where
DOstream = saturation concentration of dissolved oxygen at the temperature of the stream after mixing (mg/L)
where
or
Lt = L0 _1 − 10 −Kt i
= 2.303 Kd
Logarithmic Method
0.85S = ` L − y j
kd a t
2.303t
where
Critical Point/Deficit
Kd
Dc = e K L a o 10 K d t c
−
r
Kr − Kd
tc = K − K ln = K d1 − D a K La nG
1 Kr
r d d d
where
D a 0 . 418
L a = Dc d K n>1 + K − K d1 − D n H
K2 Kr
1 2 r c
Si
where µ i = for i = 1 to n
K s i + Si
6.7.5.2 Nonsteady State Continuous Flow
Dx0 + `µ − k d − D j x
dx =
dt
6.7.5.3 Steady State Continuous Flow
µ = D with k d 11 µ
where
m
2
Ks
where
X1 = product (mg/L)
Vr = volume (L)
t = time (time)
Comparison of Steady-State Reten
on Times () for Decay Reac
ons of Different Order a
Equations for Mean Retention Times (θ)
Reaction Order r Ideal Batch Ideal Plug Flow Ideal CMFR
(C 0 – Ct ) (C 0 – Ct ) (C 0 – C t)
b
Zero –k
k k k
First –k C ln (C 0 C t ) ln (C 0 C t ) ( C0 C t) – 1
k k k
Second – k C2 ( C0 Ct ) – 1 ( C0 Ct ) – 1 ( C0 Ct ) – 1
kC0 kC0 kC t
a
C0 = initial concentration or influent concentration; Ct = final condition or effluent concentration.
b
Expressions are valid for kθ ≤ C0; otherwise Ct = 0.
Davis, M.L., and S.J. Masten, Principles of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 2004.
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Principles of Environmental Engineering and Science, Masten, Susan J., Davis,
Mackenzie L., 2003, Tables 3.1 and 3.2, p. 111; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
BCF = Corg /C
where
Kow = CO / Cw
where
K sw = Koc foc
where
ρ
R = 1 + e n oKd
e
where
ne = effective porosity
Kd = distribution coefficient
where
d _ SF i
=p = CDI # SF
m_ t i
where
d = dose (mg)
t = time (days)
^ IRh^ EF h^ ED h
CDI = C
^ BW h^ AT h
where
* Frequent ED Values:
2
Normal − d 1 X−µ n
−3 # x # 3 μ σ
#x 1 2 σ
−3
e dx
σ 2π
−3 # y # 3
Lognormal y−µ y
2
−1f
y−µ y
2
−1f p p
1 2 σy
#− 3y 1 2 σy 0#x#3 μy σy
e e dy
y = ln x σ y 2π σ y 2π
β + 0 . 577α
Extreme value:
1 − _ y + e −y i 6 Sx
αe e −e − y −3 # x # 3 α= π 1.283α
Type I (Gumbel)
x−µ
αx α 1 β α e _ x / β i α
y= − − −
β 8Γ _1 + 2 / α i − Γ 2 _1 + 1 / α iB
β 1/2
x$0
1 − e _ x / β iα βΓ _1 + 1 / α i
Type III −
p0 `1 + y/α j e cy/α
c −
Log-Pearson c
where #− 3y p0 _1 + y / αi e −cy / α dy
Type III p0 = prob. at the mode −3 # y # 3 _c + 1 i α
c
α
c+1 c
(known as incomplete
c+1 0#x#3
y = ln x =N c
α e c Γ (c + 1)
gamma function)
Q = inflow (gal/min)
V = TQ / 4
where
14 +
Curve B: 1
4 + P
18 + P
Curve G:
4+ P
f = fraction of seeded dilution water volume in sample to volume of seeded dilution water in seed control
c = concentration of constituent
t = time (days)
T = temperature (°C)
kT = k20 (θ)T – 20
θ = 1.056 (T = 21–30°C)
Biotowers θ = 1.035
6.8.3.4 Absorbance
I0
A = log I
where
I0 = initial detector reading for the blank (i.e., distilled water) after passing through a solution of known depth
I = final detector reading after passing through solution containing constituents of interest
6.8.3.5 Transmittance
I
T = I # 100
a
where T = transmittance (%)
1 fV2 − v2 p
hL =
C 2g
where
= frequently 0.7 for clean screen and 0.6 for clogged screen
V = 1.4h L g + v 2
6.8.4.2 Bar Rack Head Loss–Kirschmer Method (Clean Racks)
w 1.33 v 2
h L = βc b m
2g sin
θ
1.33
h L = βc b m
w
h v sin θ
where
Q
A=
2h L Cg
2
1 dQ n
C=
2h L g A
6.8.5.2 Clarifiers
Hydraulic Loading Rate
v0 = Q/A
where
and
θ = V/Q
Scour Velocity
0.5
8β ( s − 1) gd
vc =
f
where
QR, Xw
RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Qw, Xw
SLUDGE
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS
SLUDGE
A2O, UCT
SLUDGE
BARDENPHO
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
AEROBIC
RETURN SLUDGE
SLUDGE
BIOCHEMICAL SIDESTREAM
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill. From Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse by George Tchobanoglous, Franklin L.
Burton, H. David Stensel (Metcalf & Eddy), 2003, Figs. 8-29 & 8-30, p. 800 & 801; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
©2021 NCEES 454
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
where
S0 Q0 S0
F/M = VX = = BOD
θX MLSS
where
Process Efficiency
S0 − Se
E ^% h = # 100
S0
VX VX
θc = =
Q w X w + Qe Xe _Q − Q w i Xe + Q w X w
where
Sludge Production
R = QR /Q
where
R = recycle ratio (dimensionless)
M
Vs =
Ps S s g w
where
SV # 1, 000
SVI =
MLSS
where
rsu Q _ S0 − Se i S0 − Se
U= X = VX
=
τX
_ F / M iE
U=
100
where
Secondary/Final Clarifiers
Secondary Clarifier Flow:
Q = Q0 + Q R
where
The surface overflow rate for activated sludge system final clarifiers is based only on influent wastewater flow (Q0) and
does not include return activated sludge flow (QR).
The solids loading rate for activated sludge system final clarifiers is based on the influent wastewater flow (Q0) plus the
return activated sludge flow (QR). Solids loading rate criteria typically assumes the return/recycle sludge flow rate (QR) is
100% of the average design flow at the design mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration.
Weir Loadings
WOR = QH/L
where
Flow ≤ 1 MGD: weir overflow rates should not exceed 10,000 gpd/ft
Flow > 1 MGD: weir overflow rates should not exceed 15,000 gpd/ft
Settling
Refer to Drinking Water Distribution and Treatment – Settling and Sedimentation.
vh = Q/Ax
where
Methanol Addition
Cm = 2.47(NO3-N) + 1.53(NO2-N) + 0.87(DO)
where
Biomass produced:
A = 1.3s a _ f P − 1 i
S Sa
where
P = pressure (atm)
p + 101.35
P = (SI units)
101.35
p + 14.7
P = (U.S. customary units)
14.7
p = gauge pressure (kPa or lbf/ft2 gauge)
Minimum = 3 ponds
Depth = 3−8 ft
Se n
= e −kD / q
S0
Organic loading rate per surface area (lb/day-ft2):
Q0 S0 _8.34 i
AM
where
where
k = treatability constant; functions of wastewater and medium (min–1); range 0.01–0.1; for municipal
wastewater and modular plastic media 0.06 min–1 at 20°C
kT = k20(1.035)T−20
where
E1 = efficiency of BOD removal for process at 20°C, including recirculation and sedimentation (%)
F = recirculation factor
where
R = recirculated flow
I = raw inflow
6.8.5.7 Blowers
Power Requirements
WRT1 P2 0 . 283
PW = >d n − 1H
Cne P1
where
C = 550 ft-lbf/(sec-hp)
6.8.6 Nitrification/Denitrification
6.8.6.1 Overall Nitrification Reaction
+ − +
NH 4 + 1.863 O2 + 0.098 CO2 " 0.0196 C5H7NO2 + 0.98 NO3 + 0.0941 H2O + 1.98 H
Wastewater:
− −
C10H19O3N + 10 NO3 " 5 N2 + 10 CO2 + 3 H2O + NH3 + 10 OH
Methanol:
− −
5 CH3OH + 6 NO3 " 3 N2 + 5 CO2 + 7 H2O + 6 OH
Acetate:
− −
5 CH3COOH + 8 NO3 " 4 N2 + 10 CO2 + 6 H2O + 8 OH
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, George, Burton,
Franklin L., Stensel, H. David., Metcalf & Eddy, 2003, Table 8-24, p. 802; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
1. Ferric chloride
FeCl3 + PO43– → FePO4 (↓) + 3 Cl–
2. Ferrous chloride
3 FeCl2 + 2 PO43– → Fe3(PO4)2 (↓) + 6 Cl–
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, George, Burton,
Franklin L., Stensel, H. David., Metcalf & Eddy, 2003, Table 14-7, p. 1456; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
6.8.9 Digestion
6.8.9.1 Aerobic Design
Typical Design Criteria for Aerobic Digesters
Design criteria for aerobic digesters
Parameter Value
Sludge retention time (day)
At 20°C 40
At 15°C 60
3
Solids loading (lb volatile solids/ft -day) 0 .1 –0 .3
Oxygen requirements (lb O 2 /lb solids destroyed)
Cell tissue ~2.3
BOD5 in primary sludge 1.6–1.9
Energy requirements for mixing
Mechanical aerators (hp/103 ft3) 0.7–1.50
3 3 3
Diffused-air mixing (ft /10 ft -min) 20–40
Dissolved-oxygen residual in liquid (mg/L) 1–2
Reduction in volatile suspended solids (VSS) (%) 40–50
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, George,
Metcalf & Eddy, 1991, Table 12-24, p. 837; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Tank Volume
Qi ` Xi + FSi j
V=
X d d k d Pv + θ n
1
c
where
F = fraction of the influent BOD5 consisting of raw primary sludge (expressed as a decimal)
FSi can be neglected if primary sludge is not included on the sludge flow to the digester.
40
30
20
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
TEMPERATURE ˚C × SLUDGE AGE, DAYS
VOLATILE SOLIDS REDUCTION IN AN AEROBIC DIGESTER AS A FUNCTION
OF DIGESTER LIQUID TEMPERATURE AND DIGESTER SLUDGE AGE
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, George, Burton,
Franklin L., Stensel, H. David., Metcalf & Eddy, 2003, fig. 14-31, pp. 1537-1538; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Anaerobic Digestion
Design parameters for anaerobic digesters
Parameter Standard-rate High-rate
Solids residence time (day) 30–90 10–20
Volatile solids loading (kg/m3/day) 0.5–1.6 1.6–6.4
Digested solids concentration (%) 4–6 4–6
Volatile solids reduction (%) 35–50 45–55
3
Gas production (m /kg VSS added) 0.5–0.55 0.6–0.65
Methane content (%) 65 65
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Environmental Engineering, Tchobanoglous, George, Rowe, Donald R.,
Peavy, Howard S., 1984, Table 5-13, p. 288; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
Standard Rate
V1 + V2
Reactor Volume = t r + V2 t s
2
High Rate
First stage
Second stage
V1 + V2
Reactor Volume = tt + V2 t s
2
where
tr = time to react in a high-rate digester = time to react and thicken in a standard-rate digester
ts = storage time
6.8.10 Disinfection
6.8.10.1 Ultraviolet Light
Refer to Drinking Water Distribution and Treatment – Ultraviolet Light (UV).
6.8.10.2 Chlorination
NH3 + HOCl → H 2 O + NH 2 Cl (Monochloramine)
6.8.10.3 Dechlorination
Sodium sulfite:
Sodium bisulfite:
Sodium metabisulfite:
Sulfur dioxide:
where
where
Q = 1, 020 P _1 − 0.01 P i
where
To estimate the amount of water needed to fight a fire in an individual, nonsprinklered building, ISO uses the formula:
where
Ci = 18F (Ai)0.5
= 0.8 for Construction Class 3 (noncombustible construction) and Construction Class 4 (masonry
noncombustible construction)
= 0.6 for Construction Class 5 (modified fire-resistive construction) and Construction Class 6
(fire-resistive construction)
©2021 NCEES 470
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
Ai = effective area
3. Ferric sulfate
4. Ferric chloride
6.9.2.2 Mixing
Rapid Mix and Flocculator Design
P = γH L
G= µV tµ
Gt = 104 to 105
where
t = time (sec or s)
CD = drag coefficient = 1.8 for a flat blade with a L:W > 20:1
AP = area of blade perpendicular to the direction of travel through the water (ft2)
vr = vp × slip coefficient
F = 0.5C D ρ f Av 2p
where
vp = 2πrN
where
P = KT (n)3(Di)5ρf
where
6.9.2.3 Flocculation
QγH 62 . 4H = P
G= µV
= µt µV
where
Source: Source: Adapted in part from Kawamura, Susumu. Integrated Design and Operation of Water Treatment Facilities. 2nd ed.
New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000. As found in Crittenden, et. al. MWH Water Treatment Principles and Design. 3rd ed.
New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2012, Fig. 9-16, p. 633.
Linearized Form:
w 1
log qe = log V = log K f + n log Ce
q max bCe
qe =
1 + bCe
where
RL > 1 (unfavorable)
RL = 1 (linear)
RL = 0 (irreversible)
Q out
©2021 NCEES 475 Ce
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
where
where
(Q W , C in ) (Q A , A out )
WATER INLET AIR OUTLETS
(Q W , C out )
WATER OUTLET AIR INLETS (BLOWER)
(Q A , A in )
Aout = H'Cin
QW • Cin = QA H'Cin
QW = QA H'
where
Aout = concentration in the effluent air (kmol/m3); in this formulation of the equation Ain and Cout are assumed
to be negligible, for simplicity
T = temperature (K)
Rs = stripping factor
L
HTU = K a C
L
where
_Q a /Q i _Q a /Q i Q
=S = = e a o H'
_Q a /Q i min _1/H' i Q
where
7. Recarbonation
where
where
2 `ρ ρ − ρ w j V p g
vt =
C d Aρ w
where
g _ρ p − ρ w i d 2 gρ w _ SG − 1 i d 2
vt = =
18µ 18µ
Q
Approach velocity = horizontal velocity =
Ax
Q
Hydraulic loading rate =
A
V
Hydraulic residence time = =θ
Q
where
SG = specific gravity
where
Q Q g _ρ s − ρ i d 2
v0 = = =
A WL 18µ
where
Basin Depth:
H = v0 t
H
INLET
ZONE SEDIMENTATION
VH ZONE OUTLET
ZONE
Vt
h
VH
SLUDGE ZONE
Flow-through Velocity:
Q
vt = HW
Removal Ratio:
= h= vt t = vt
r H v0 t v0
where
nd n
n
R = /d
Dhn Rn + Rn + 1
h=1 H 2
where
R = TSS removal (%) based on plotted percent removal as a number against time and depth
where
Clarification Area:
Q
A=v
s
where
Horizontal Velocities
Water Treatment—horizontal velocities should not exceed 0.5 ft/min
Dimensions
1. Rectangular Tanks
a. Length-to-width ratio = 3:1 to 5:1
b. Basin width is determined by the scraper width (or multiples of the scraper width)
c. Bottom slope is set at 1%
2. Circular Tanks
a. Diameters up to 200 ft
b. Diameters must match the dimensions of the sludge scraping mechanism
c. Bottom slope is less than 8%
where
where
Q = flow rate
Ax = cross-sectional area
V = tank volume
Hydraulic
Overflow Rate
Residence Depth
Type of Basin Average Peak Time (ft)
2 3 2•
(gpd/ft ) (m /m day) (gpd/ft ) (m3/m2•day)
2 (hr)
Water Treatment
Clarification following coagulation and flocculation:
Alum coagulation 350−550 14−22 4−8 12−16
Ferric coagulation 550−700 22−28 4−8 12−16
Upflow clarifiers
Groundwater 1,500−2,200 61−90 1
Surface water 1,000−1,500 41−61 4
Clarification following lime-soda softening
Conventional 550−1,000 22−41 2−4
Upflow clarifiers
Groundwater 1,000−2,500 41−102 1
Surface water 1,000−1,800 41−73 4
A = mL of sample
B = mL of odor-free water
where
Rose Equation
Monosized Media:
1.067 _v s i2 LC D
hf =
ψ gη 4 d
Multisized Media:
L _1 − η i v s2 f ij' xij
hf = / dij
η3 g
1−η
f ' = friction factor = 150 d Re n + 1.75
where
vs = Q/Aplan
dij, d = diameter of filter media particles; arithmetic average of adjacent screen openings (m)
Bed Expansion
Monosized:
L0 _1 − η 0 i
Lf =
v B 0.22
1 −c v m
t
Multisized:
xij
L f = L0 _1 − η 0 i /
v B 0 . 22
1 −dv n
t, i, j
v B 0 . 22
ηf =c v m
t
where
P = P f − Pp
where
Ptm = P f − P p
where
Q p = Fw A
where
tf = time needed to filter 500 mL at the end of the 15-minute test period
φ = osmotic coefficient
SELECTIVELY
PERMEABLE
v = number of ions formed from one molecule of electrolyte MEMBRANE
WASTE BRINE
where
C = concentration (kmol/m3)
©2021 NCEES 489
Chapter 6: Water Resources and Environmental
Js = Kp (Cin – Cout)
Water Flux
Jw = Wp (∆P – ∆π)
where
6.9.9 Ultrafiltration
εr 2 # ∆P
Jw =
8µδ
where
ε = membrane porosity
µ = absolute viscosity
δ = membrane thickness
8H +B8OCl −B
= 3 # 10 −8 mole/L at 25cC
6HOCl@
Ki =
Chlorination Chart
DESTRUCTION FORMATION OF DESTRUCTION OF FORMATION OF
OF CHLORINE CHLORO-ORGANIC CHLORAMINES AND FREE CHLORINE
RESIDUAL BY AND CHLORAMINE CHLORO-ORGANIC AND PRESENCE OF
REDUCING COMPOUNDS COMPOUNDS CHLORO-ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS COMPOUNDS NOT
DESTROYED
5
FREE AND
CHLORINE RESIDUALS (mg/L)
COMBINED
4 RESIDUALS
B
3
COMBINED FREE RESIDUAL
RESIDUALS
2
1 C COMBINED
BREAKPOINT RESIDUAL
A
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
CHLORINE DOSE (mg/L)
Source: Republished with permission of McGraw-Hill, from Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, George, Burton,
Franklin L., Stensel, H. David., Metcalf & Eddy, 2003, Fig. 12-6, p. 1238; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
I
OC
80
CI
% OF AVAILABLE CHLORINE
AS
60
40
20
0
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
pH
CTcalc = C × t10
where
t10 = time it takes 10% of the water to flow through the reactor measured during peak hourly flow (min)
= can be determined from traces study data or the following relationship, t10(approx) = θ × BF
where
BF = baffling factor
Baffling Factors
Baffling Baffling
Baffling Description
Condition Factor
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking: Technical Guidance Manual. Washington,
DC: EPA, 2003, Table 4-2, p. 32. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking: Technical Guidance Manual. Washington,
DC: EPA, 2003, Table 7-1, p. 62. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
6.9.12 Typical Removal Credits and Inactivation Requirements for Various Treatment Technologies
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking: Technical Guidance Manual. Washington,
DC: EPA, 2003, Table 7-2, p. 62. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking: Technical Guidance Manual. Washington,
DC: EPA, 2003, Table B-1, p. 103. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
CT VALUES* FOR
4-LOG INACTIVATION OF VIRUSES BY FREE CHLORINE
pH
Temperature (°C) 6−9 10
0.5 12 90
5 8 60
10 6 45
15 4 30
20 3 22
25 2 15
*Although units did not appear in the original tables, units are min∙mg/L
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. LT1ESWTR Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking: Technical Guidance Manual. Washington,
DC: EPA, 2003, Table B-2, p. 104. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=20002649.txt.
Source: Copied from Environmental Protection Agency 141.720 2010 ed., p. 623; full source below
Source: Copied from Environmental Protection Agency 141.720 2010 ed., Page 623; full source below
CFR Title 40. Chapter I. Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter D. Water Programs, Part 141. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations,
Subpart W. Enhanced Treatment for Cryptosporidium, Subjgrp 28. "Requirements for Microbial Toolbox Components," Section 141.720. Inactivation
toolbox components, 7–1–10 edition, p. 623, www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol22/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol22-sec141-720.pdf.
D = I#t
where
I = UV intensity (mW/cm2)
N D ^ t h = N D ^0 h e kIt
−
where
ND ^0h = total number of dispersed microorganisms prior to UV light application (at time t = 0)
Inactivation of both dispersed and particle-associated microorganisms with an applied density to the bulk liquid medium:
Np ^0h
N ^t h = ND ^0h e
−kd
+ _ −kd
i
kd 1 − e
where
d = UV dose (mJ/cm2)
UV Dose Table for Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, and Virus Inactivation Credit
Cryptosporidium UV Giardia lamblia UV Virus
Log Credit
dose (mJ/cm2) dose (mJ/cm2) UV dose (mJ/cm2)
(i) 0.5 1.6 1.5 39
(ii) 1.0 2.5 2.1 58
(iii) 1.5 3.9 3.0 79
(iv) 2.0 5.8 5.2 100
(v) 2.5 8.5 7.7 121
(vi) 3.0 12 11 143
(vii) 3.5 15 15 163
(viii) 4.0 22 22 186
Source: CFR Title 40. Chapter I. Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter D. Water Programs, Part 141.
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, Subpart W. Enhanced Treatment for Cryptosporidium, Subjgrp 28. "Requirements for Microbial
Toolbox Components," Section 141.720. Inactivation toolbox components, 7–1–10 edition, p. 624,
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol22/pdf/CFR-2010-title40-vol22-sec141-720.pdf
.