The Fraud of Soviet Anti-Semitism
The Fraud of Soviet Anti-Semitism
The Fraud of Soviet Anti-Semitism
STARS
1-1-1962
This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political
& Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
Recommended Citation
Aptheker, Herbert, "The fraud of Soviet anti-Semitism" (1962). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social
Movements. 252.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/252
THE FRAUD OF
"SOVIET
By HERBERT APTHEKER
A NEW C E N T U R Y P A M P H L E T
Z8 ct*~
THE FRAUD OF
"SOVIET ANTI-SEMITISMf'
LbStOpthe ~ '
Haeh '
On June 17, 1962, the Sovier Government announced the
appointment of Veniamin Dymshitz (mentioned on page 8) as
Chairman of the State PIanning CMnmiasion, and as Deputy
Prime Minister of the U,SS.R.
I
THIE FRAUD OF
"SOVIET ANTI-SEM ITISM"
I
remwe all designation of race or nationality from documents-
even drivers' licenses. En our country, under present conditions,
that is a progressive effort, especialIy as it pertains to dauunents
related to employment or police records. But when white
chauvinism has been illegakd and sustained education against
it has been conducted over a prolonged period? and the whole
fabric of social, poIitical and economic life has been changed, such
demands will fade away, and the obvious usefulness, for purposes
of identifiation and statistiml knowledge, of the nationality of
the person wiU be dear and primary. Such characterization then
will be in no way invidious, and data on nationality will be ofFered
as naturally as today one offers the color of his eyes.
Sptemf9
The SoXded CCQtmta
Another common charge is that there exists a "quota" in the
educational institutions d the Soviet Unioh, as there used to exist
in old Russia-and old Poland, Hungary, Rumania-and as exists
pregentlp in msny educational institutions in the United States,
where it is still applied against Jews, let alone the notorious and
rigid W i n a t i o n against Negroes.
This charge, too, is false. Merit in the Soviet Union-unlifte
in the United States-basicaIly d e t d n a enhance into educatiorral
institutions and increasingly, since education is fie-as facilities
grow-everyone is receiving equally more and mare edmtion.
Thus, as of December I, 1960, there were 3,545,- Soviet citizens
in achwls of higher education; of these, rr,qaom were Rmians,
517,oorr were Ukrainians, zgr,mo were JM, 95- were+ B y e b
rusttiam, 88,ocro were Georgians, 74,- were Armenians, etc. Jews,
though standing eleventh in terms of numbers among the nationali-
I
ties within the USSR, stood third in the number of students attend- r
'
ing higher institutions of learning; put another way, thou@ Jews
amounted to only 1 . 1 % of the population of the Soviet Union,
they amounted to 8.2% of the number of students in institutions
of higher learning in that country.
At this point it is sometimes objected-as by Senator Javits,
for example-that while the percentage of Jewish students at such
institutions may be beyond the percentage of Jews in the popu-
lation, still the present percentagr is below what it was in 1935.
And that fact-it is a fact-is supposed to show some kind of quota
system and to be explicable only on the basis of such a system,
refiecting an alleged policy of anti-Semitism. First, if the per-
centage of Jewish students is about 8 times that of the Jewish
population as a whole it surely dms not reflect a quota system
against Jews. Second, the fall in percentage in the past twenty&ve
or thirty years is explained by two things: (a) the msualty rare
among Jews in World War I1 was higher than that for most other
nationality group in the USSR: @) the literacy and cultural a