Obligations 101
Obligations 101
Obligations 101
Pure Obligations
If the obligation is not subject to a period or condition. Period is future and certain event.
There is room for uncertainty in periods. This is because it is known that the period is going to
happen BUT we will not know when it is going to happen ex. Death. A case when it would happen,
but it is certain that the event will happen.
It is a certain event that will happen but the happening of such or exact date thereof is not known.
Conditional Obligations
If the obligation is subject to a future and uncertain event.
Different if the event upon which the obligation is hinged is who between A and B will die
first. thrust here is no longer the fact of death taking place, but which of them dies first. It
becomes then a future and uncertain event, a condition.
In this case, It is not the occurrence of death which is the incident constituting the condition
or period. It is only an element. What we are looking here is who would die first.
Uncertainty lies with the order.
If the period and condition is resolutory: it will have no relation to the creation or
demandability of the obligation because in both cases, the obligation is already existing and
demandable. It will only affect the existence of the obligation in so far as extinguishment is
concerned.
Note: YES, it is possible that a past event will be constituted as a condition. The past event may be a
condition if the same is unknown to the parties. What actually constitutes the condition is the
acquisition of the knowledge of the parties of the happening of the past event.
Suspensive
GR:
Article 1186. The condition shall be deemed fulfilled when
the obligor voluntarily prevents its fulfillment.
Exception: The condition will not be deemed fulfilled if the debtor acts out of the enforcement of
his right.
Ex. In reserva troncal, the reservatarios must survive the reservista. The rights of the reservatarios
are subject to the a suspensive condition – reservatarios shall survive the reservista. The reservista
acquires full ownership of the property, thus may dispose of the property. The 3rd person who
would acquire the property would acquire it subject to reserva troncal.
The problem would arise if we are dealing with a registered property. Under our torrens system,
the buyer in good faith would have to rely on what appears of the title. If the buyer is in good faith
and has no knowledge about the reserva affecting the titled property and title does not show that it
is subject to reserva troncal, the buyer can acquire the property free of the lien imposed by the
reserva truncal. Thus, the reservatarios must ask the Register of Deeds for the annotation of his
rights on the title of the property.
Rules in case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the
object during the pendency of the obligation
Article 1189. When the conditions have been imposed with the
intention of suspending the efficacy of an obligation to give,
the following rules shall be observed in case of the
improvement, loss or deterioration of the thing during the
pendency of the condition:
1. If the thing is lost without the fault of the debtor, the
obligation shall be extinguished;
2. If the thing is lost through the fault of the debtor, he
shall be obliged to pay damages; it is understood that
the thing is lost when it perishes, or goes out of
commerce, or disappears in such a way that its
existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered;
3. When the thing deteriorates without the fault of the
debtor, the impairment is to be borne by the creditor;
4. If it deteriorates through the fault of the debtor, the
creditor may choose between the rescission of the
obligation and its fulfillment, with indemnity for
damages in either case;
5. If the thing is improved by its nature, or by time, the
improvement shall inure to the benefit of the creditor;
6. If it is improved at the expense of the debtor, he shall
have no other right than that granted to the
usufructuary.
(Loss) A thing is considered loss when it perishes, or goes out of commerce, or disappears in such a
way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered.
Effect if the suspensive condition is fulfilled: It will give rise to the birth of the obligation.
We consider the obligation to be existing upon the constitution of the obligation because we
recognize the rule of retroactivity under Art. 1187. Provision provides that the effects of a
conditional obligation to give, once the condition has been fulfilled, shall retroact to the day of the
constitution of the obligation.
Reason for this rule: Condition is only accidental to the obligation. Had the parties known
beforehand that the condition would be fulfilled, they would have bound themselves under a pure
obligation.
As for the fruits and income received by debtor during the pendency:
In case of reciprocal obligation, the fruits and interests are deemed mutually compensated.
In case of unilateral obligation, the debtor owns the fruits and interests because the
obligation is gratuitous, unless from the nature and circumstances of the obligation it can be
inferred a different intention was intended by parties.
In case of obligations to do and not to do, the court will determine.
Resolutory
The happening of the condition will terminate the obligation.
Prohibited: when potestative and suspensive condition is dependent of the will of the debtor.
Potestative condition is one which is dependent on the will of the parties. It is only when the
potestative condition is dependent on the will of the debtor that is prohibited when
combined with a suspensive condition.
Note: The IMPOSSIBILITY should exists at the time of the constitution of the condition.
If the impossibility takes place after the constitution of the condition, it will not affect the
validity of the obligation, but it will simply extinguish the same thing (extinguished, but it
may still have consequences unlike if from the very beginning it is already void from the
start.)