Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk For Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy?
Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk For Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy?
Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk For Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy?
Pregnancy?
Author(s): Bruce J. Ellis, John E. Bates, Kenneth A. Dodge, David M. Fergusson, L. John
Horwood, Gregory S. Pettit and Lianne Woodward
Source: Child Development, Vol. 74, No. 3 (May - Jun., 2003), pp. 801-821
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3696230
Accessed: 14-08-2016 16:10 UTC
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3696230?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Wiley, Society for Research in Child Development are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Child Development
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Child Development, May/June 2003, Volume 74, Number 3, Pages 801-821
Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk for Early Sexual Activity
and Teenage Pregnancy?
Bruce J. Ellis, John E. Bates, Kenneth A. Dodge, David M. Fergusson, L. John Horwood,
Gregory S. Pettit, and Lianne Woodward
The impact of father absence on early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy was investigated in longitudinal
studies in the United States (N = 242) and New Zealand (N = 520), in which community samples of girls were
followed prospectively from early in life (5 years) to approximately age 18. Greater exposure to father absence was
strongly associated with elevated risk for early sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy. This elevated risk was
either not explained (in the U.S. study) or only partly explained (in the New Zealand study) by familial,
ecological, and personal disadvantages associated with father absence. After controlling for covariates, there was
stronger and more consistent evidence of effects of father absence on early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy
than on other behavioral or mental health problems or academic achievement. Effects of father absence are
discussed in terms of life-course adversity, evolutionary psychology, social learning, and behavior genetic models.
In modern Western societies, adolescent girls face a trialized countries. Approximately 10% of girls in
biosocial dilemma. On the one hand, the biological the United States and 7% of girls in New Zealand
capacity to reproduce ordinarily develops in early between the ages of 15 and 19 years become
adolescence; on the other hand, girls who realize this pregnant each year, with around half of these
capacity before adulthood often experience a variety pregnancies culminating in a live birth (Chees-
of negative life outcomes. Specifically, adolescent brough, Ingham, & Massey, 1999; Dickson, Sporle,
childbearing is associated with lower educational Rimene, & Paul, 2000). Given these costs to
and occupational attainment, more mental and adolescents and their children, it is critical to identify
physical health problems, inadequate social support life experiences and pathways that place girls at
networks for parenting, and increased risk of abuse increased risk for early sexual activity and adoles-
and neglect for children born to teen mothers (e.g., cent pregnancy.
Furstenberg, Brooks-Gunn, & Chase-Lansdale, 1989; Many studies have identified the absence of the
Konner & Shostak, 1986; Woodward & Fergusson, biological father from the home as a major risk factor
1999). Despite these consequences, the United States for both early sexual activity (e.g., Day, 1992;
and New Zealand have the first and second highest Kiernan & Hobcraft, 1997; Newcomber & Udry,
rates of teenage pregnancy among Western indus- 1987) and teenage pregnancy (e.g., Geronimus &
Korenman, 1992; Hogan & Kitagawa, 1985; McLa-
nahan, 1999). This finding is consistent with life-
Bruce J. Ellis, Department of Psychology, University of Canter-
course
adversity models of early sexual activity and
bury; John E. Bates, Department of Psychology, Indiana Uni-
teenage pregnancy, which posit that a life history of
versity; Kenneth A. Dodge, Center for Child and Family Policy,
Duke University; David M. Fergusson and L. John Horwood,familial and ecological stress provokes earlier onset
of sexual
Department of Psychological Medicine, Christchurch School of activity and reproduction (e.g., Belsky,
Steinberg, & Draper, 1991; Coley & Chase-Lansdale,
Medicine; Gregory S. Pettit, Department of Human Development
and Family Studies, Auburn University; Lianne Woodward,
1998; Fergusson & Woodward, 2000a; Robbins,
Department of Education, University of Canterbury.
In the United States, this work was supported by National
Kaplan, & Martin, 1985; Scaramella, Conger, Simons,
Institute of Mental Health grants MH28018 and MH42498 & and
Whitbeck, 1998). Life-course adversity models,
National Institute of Child Health and Human however,
Development grant do not attribute any special causal sig-
nificance
HD30572. In New Zealand, this work was supported by the to father absence. Instead, these models
Health Research Council, National Child Health Research
conceptualize father absence as just one of many
Foundation, the Canterbury Medical Research Foundation, and
factors that can undermine the quality of family
the New Zealand Lottery Grants Board. We thank Jay Belsky,
Ronald Dahl, and Satoshi Kanazawa for comments on earlier environments. According to life-course adversity
drafts of this article. models, it is not father absence per se but various
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Bruce Ellis, Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury,
Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. Electronic mail may
? 2003 by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
be sent to: [email protected]. All rights reserved. 0009-3920/2003/7403-0010
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
802 Ellis et al.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 803
(Day, 1992; Devine, Long, & Forehand, 1993; Miller Method: United States
et al., 1997; Upchurch, Aneshensel, Sucoff, & Levy-
Storms, 1999) and adolescent pregnancy or child-
Participants and Overview
bearing (Hogan & Kitigawa, 1985; Robbins et al.,
1985), after controlling for such confounding The United States data were collected as part of
vari-
the ongoing Child Development Project, a multisite
ables as race, socioeconomic status (SES), neighbor-
hood danger, and parental monitoring and longitudinal
control. study of socialization factors in chil-
All of these studies, however, began when daughters dren's and adolescents' adjustment (see Dodge,
were already in early to late adolescence Bates, & Pettit, 1990; Pettit, Bates, & Dodge, 1997).
and thus
were unable to assess familial and ecological Participating families were initially recruited from
stressors before daughters' risk for involvement three geographical
in areas (Nashville and Knoxville,
sexual activity. The current research is theTennessee, first to and Bloomington, Indiana). At the time
assess prospectively life-course adversity through- of kindergarten preregistration in the summers of
out early and middle childhood, and control 1987
for(Cohort
its 1) and 1988 (Cohort 2), parents of
effects when testing for the relation between matriculating
timing children were solicited at random (in
of father absence and rates of early sexual person at the child's school or by mail) to become
activity
and adolescent pregnancy. involved in the study. About 75% agreed. A total of
3. Does earlier onset of biological father 585 families agreed to participate in the study. Of
absence discriminantly increase risk for early onset these 585 families, 281 of the children were girls. The
of sexual activity and teenage pregnancy-but analyses reported in this article are based on this
female subsample, which was demographically
not for adolescent behavioral and mental health
problems more generally-independent of early and representative of the geographic regions
diverse
(81% White, 17% African American, 2% other; 28%
externalizing problems and life-course adversity?
In other words, is greater exposure to lived
father
with a single mother at the beginning of the
absence a general risk factor for the develop-The Hollingshead (1975) Four-Factor Index
study).
ment of psychopathology, or is it specific toofsexual
Social Status was computed from demographic
development? information provided by the parents of the girls. The
To our knowledge, only Newcomer and Udry mean family score on the index at the beginning of
the study
(1987) have explicitly addressed this question. In a was 38.85 (SD=14.0), indicating a
predominantly
short-term longitudinal study of White adolescents, middle-class sample. Data on girls'
early
Newcomer and Udry found that the effect of father externalizing behavioral problems and on
familial and ecological stressors were collected in
absence on a composite measure of age-graded
minor delinquencies (e.g., smoking, drinking Years 1 through 9 of the study (ages 5-13). Data on
alco-
adolescent
hol, cheating on a test) was statistically significant sexual activity, pregnancy, internalizing
and
and about equal in magnitude to the effect of fatherexternalizing behavioral problems, academic
performance,
absence on onset of first sexual intercourse in girls. and violence were collected in Years 10
through
Newcomber and Udry, however, did not control for 13 of the study (ages 14-17). At the
potentially confounding third variables (e.g.,completion
race, of the study in Year 13, the average age
of the girls was 17.3 years (SD = .34). Of the original
SES, mother's age at first birth) that could account
281 girls, 242 (86%) participated in the Years 10
for the correlation between father absence and
delinquency. The current research examined through
the 13 data collections. This subset was gen-
unique effects of timing of father absence erally
on representative
a of the original sample (16%
African American; 25% from single-mother homes;
variety of psychosocial and educational outcomes,
after controlling for the effects of child mean SES = 39.45). Other analyses have shown that
conduct
problems and familial and ecological stressors
attrition has not significantly biased the sample on
during childhood. either initial child adjustment or family socialization
This set of questions was investigated in variables
two (see Pettit et al., 1997; Pettit, Bates, Dodge,
independent longitudinal studies in the United 1999). Nonetheless, there was a slight but
& Meece,
States and New Zealand. In the U.S. study, a statistically nonsignificant trend for the 242 girls in
community sample of girls was followed prospec-the current analyses to underrepresent girls from
tively from the summer before kindergarten through socially disadvantaged backgrounds (low SES, Afri-
to the 12th grade. In the New Zealand study, a birth can American, single-mother homes).
cohort of girls was followed prospectively from Following recruitment, mothers were interviewed
infancy through to age 18. at home in the summer before daughters' entry into
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
804 Ellis et al.
as thewhen
kindergarten (see Dodge, Pettit, & Bates, 1994), cutoff for late father absence to complete
most children were 5 years of age. The measurement
90-min of father absence before the onset of
audiorecorded interview included both open-ended
first pregnancy in daughters. Father presence was
and structured questions about each of two eras as
defined inbirth father presence in the home through
age
the child's life (a period from 12 months of 13.up
age Classification
to of girls into the father-present
or father-absent groups was based solely on birth
12 months ago, and the past 12 months). Questions
father status and did not take stepfathers into
concerned the child's development and child-care
account
history, family stressors, parental behavior, (33% = early father absent, 12% = late father
exposure
to socializing factors, and current functioning.
absent, 55% = father present).
Reliability was assessed through independent rat-
ings of 41 randomly selected families made bySexual
Adolescent a Outcomes
second coder who sat in with the interviewer.
Additional home interviews with the mothers were Early sexual activity. In Year 12 (age 16), girls were
conducted in Years 7 and 9 of the study (whenasked whether they had ever had sexual intercourse.
daughters were approximately ages 11 and 13).Girls who responded "no" were coded as 0 for early
Questions concerned family changes and adjust-
sexual activity (60%); girls who responded "yes"
ment, child's involvement in after-school care were coded as 1 for early sexual activity (40%). The
age 16 cutoff has been commonly used in past
settings, parenting practices, and neighborhood
characteristics over the past year. studies to demarcate early onset of sexual activity
(e.g., Fergusson & Woodward, 2000b; Kiernan &
In addition, mothers annually completed child
Hobcraft, 1997; Paul, Fitzjohn, Herbison, & Dickson,
behavior-problem questionnaires and provided fam-
2000).
ily demographic data. Behavior-problem question-
naires were also completed by daughters in Years 11
Adolescent pregnancy. In Years 10 through 13 (ages
through 13 of the study (approximate ages 15-17).
14-17), girls were asked annually whether they had
Daughters answered questions about sexual behav-
become pregnant in the last year. Girls who reported
ior and pregnancy at this time. Also at this time,
no pregnancies over this period were coded as 0 for
research staff requested permission to view the
adolescent pregnancy (85%); girls who reported at
participants' academic records. least one pregnancy over this period were coded as 1
for adolescent pregnancy (15%).
Timing of Onset of Father Absence
Covariate Factors
To determine timing of onset of father absence,
To assess the extent to which associations between
household composition data were collected during
timing of father absence and adolescent sexual
Years 1 through 9 of the study (ages 5-13). Because
Hetherington (1972) and Draper and Harpending outcomes could be explained by the effects of early
(1982) suggest that the first 5 years of life constituteexternalizing
a problems and familial and ecological
sensitive period for the effects of father absencestressors,
on the following 10 variables were included
as covariates in the analysis. The measures of
daughters' sexual development, early onset of father
familial and ecological stress were chosen as
absence was defined in this study as absence of the
"birth father" (either the biological father orcovariates
an on the basis of past research indicating
(a) covariation with father absence and (b) predic-
adoptive father present from birth) from the home at
tion to early sexual activity and adolescent preg-
or before age 5. This cutoff was also chosen to allow
comparison with past studies, which have com- nancy (see reviews by Kotchick et al., 2001; Miller,
monly defined early father absence as occurringBenson,
in & Galbraith, 2001). The covariates were
measured repeatedly and prospectively from the
the first 5 years (e.g., Bereczkei & Csanaky, 1996;
Blain & Barkow, 1988; Hetherington, 1972). Girlsbeginning of each study through age 13.
were thus classified as early father absent if they
Externalizing behavior problems (early childhood).
During Years 1 and 2 of the study (ages 5-6),
were either born into single-mother families or born
into intact two-parent families but subsequently
mothers completed the Child Behavior Checklist
experienced birth father absence at or before age(CBCL;
5. Achenbach, 1991). The 33-item externalizing
problems score, which has been reported to have
Late onset of father absence was defined as birth father
excellent psychometric properties (Achenbach,
presence in the home through age 5 but subsequent
1991), was used to index daughters' early externaliz-
absence of the birth father from the home beginning
sometime during ages 6 through 13. We chose ageing
13 problems. A composite externalizing behavioral
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 805
of discipline
problems score was computed by averaging over practices and whether the child had
Years 1 and 2 (A = .81, M = 10.63, SD = 6.47).
ever been harmed by an adult during each era (see
Dodgehow
Mother's age at first birth. Mothers reported et al., 1994). Interviewers then completed
old they were when they first gave birth ratings
to a child
of the degree of restrictive discipline received
(M = 23.23, SD = 4.82). by the child (1 =nonrestrictive, mostly prosocial
Race. Race was coded as a dummy variable:
guidance; 5 = severe, strict, often physical) and whether
0 = Caucasian (83%), 1 = non-Caucasian (17%). Of the target child had been severely harmed (1 = defi-
the 42 non-Caucasian participants, 38 were Africannitely not, 5 = authorities involved). These four ratings
American. (two ratings for each of two life eras) were averaged
SES. SES was computed on the basis of mothers' to derive the early childhood harshness of discipline
and fathers' occupation and years of education score (c = .81, inter-rater agreement = .78, M = 2.05,
SD et
(Hollingshead, 1975; full description in Dodge = .67).
Harshness of discipline (preadolescence). Harshness
al., 1994). Because the rank-ordering of SES between
of discipline was also assessed during the Years 7
families was highly stable over time, a composite
childhood SES score was computed by averaging and 9 interviews. Using a 4-point scale (1 = never,
SES scores from Year 1 (age 5) and Year 9 (age4 13;
=frequently), mothers rated how often they used
a = .84, M = 38.11, SD = 12.78). each of six harsh disciplinary tactics (e.g., scold, slap
or hit with hand, use belt/paddle). A composite
Family life stress (early childhood). Family life stress
was assessed during the Year 1 interview on harshness
the of discipline measure was computed by
basis of questions concerning changes and adjust-
averaging the Year 7 (a = .67) and Year 9 (x = .67)
ments in the home and their perceived impact measures (c across the two measures = .77, M = 2.06,
on the child during each era (see Dodge etSD = .42).
al.,
1994). Interviewers completed ratings of the extent
Parental monitoring (preadolescence). Parental mon-
of stressful, challenging events faced by itoring
the was assessed during the Years 7 and 9 home
interviews with the mothers. Although the two
child and family (1 = minimum challenge, 5 = severe
frequent challenges). The rating from the two eras
measures had slightly different content, both em-
were averaged to yield a score for family ployed
life 5-point frequency scales and focused on
stressors (ac= .64, proportion agreement between
parents' awareness of their children's activities and
companions. A composite measure of parental
independent raters of the same protocol = .79,
M = 3.04, SD = .94). monitoring was computed by standardizing and
Dyadic adjustment (early childhood). During thethen averaging the Year 7 (c = .73, M=4.65,
SD = .34; see Pettit et al., 1999) and Year 9 (c = .67,
Year 1 interview, mothers were asked to recall each
era and answer questions concerning the kinds M of= 4.32, SD = .45; see Pettit, Laird, Dodge, Bates, &
family strife and violence the child was exposedCriss,to 2001) measures (c across the two mea-
sures
(see Ellis et al., 1999). Interviewers then completed = .66).
ratings of the severity of conflict within the parental Neighborhood danger (preadolescence). Neighbor-
hood danger was assessed during the Years 7
dyad (1 = rarely even shout; 5 = physical fights, more
than once). The rating from the two eras were and 9 home interviews with the mother. During
the Year 7 interview, mothers responded to a set
averaged to yield an overall score (c = .74, inter-
rater agreement = .80, M = 2.19, SD = 1.03). Mothers of six items (adapted from the Self-Care Checklist;
were also asked questions concerning levels of help see Posner & Vandell, 1994) describing their
and emotional support from their partners during general appraisal of neighborhood and family safety.
each era (see Ellis et al., 1999). Interviewers then Items were rated on a 6-point scale (very safe to very
completed ratings of level of supportiveness in the unsafe) and averaged to form an overall neighbor-
parental dyad, and the ratings from the two eras hood safety score (a=.90, M=2.01, SD=.86).
were averaged to yield an overall score (a = .88, In addition, immediately following the Year 7
inter-rater agreement = .86, M = 2.37, SD = .57). and Year 9 interviews, the interviewer completed
A composite measure of dyadic adjustment was a 4-point rating of overall neighborhood safety
computed by standardizing and then averaging the (very safe to very unsafe; Ms= 1.82 and 1.71,
measures of "severity of conflict within the parental SDs = .85 and .77, respectively). A composite mea-
dyad" (reverse-scored) and "supportiveness in the sure of neighborhood danger was computed by
parental dyad" (a across the two measures = .55). standardizing and then averaging the mother-report
Harshness of discipline (early childhood). During the and two interviewer-report measures (A across the
Year 1 interview, mothers were asked about their use three measures = .78).
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
806 Ellis et al.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 807
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
808 Ellis et al.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 809
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
810 Ellis et al.
standardized
the measure of GPA, similar tests of linearity were regression coefficient (beta) for the
conducted within an ANOVA framework. Thesetiming of father absence measure.
tests also suggested that a linear model mostTo illustrate the extent of the association between
accurately represented the association. Wethe
thus
timing of father absence and the binary outcome
measures
concluded that the relations between timing of onset after adjustment for covariates, estimates
of father absence and all outcome measures were of the adjusted rates for each outcome were
essentially linear. In all subsequent analyses, there-
computed using the parameters of the fitted logistic
fore, father absence was treated as a continuous regression models. The adjusted rates were com-
(linear) variable, which was coded so that higherputed using the method described by Lee (1981) and
scores indicated earlier onset of father absencecan be interpreted as the hypothetical rates of each
outcome that would have been observed had all
(0 = father presence, 1 = late onset of father absence,
2 = early onset of father absence). sample members experienced their existing mix of
covariate factors but varied in their exposure to
Treating father absence in this manner is concep-
tually similar to analyzing age at onset of father
father absence.
absence. Although age at onset might be a more
appropriate metric for analysis, detailed information
Rates of Early Sexual Activity and Adolescent Pregnancy
on this variable was available only in the New
by Timing of Father Absence
Zealand sample. Thus, for consistency we have used
Do rates of early sexual activity and adolescent
the same three-level classification of timing of onset
pregnancy differ according to timing of onset of
of father absence across the two samples. However,
father absence? We expected a dose-response rela-
further analysis of the New Zealand data indicated
that age at onset of father absence correlated in in which early father-absent girls would
tionship
excess of .97 with the current three-level measure. have the highest rates of early sexual activity and
This suggests that similar conclusions would be
teenage pregnancy, followed by late father-absent
drawn if more accurate assessments of the timing girls,
of followed by father-present girls.
father absence were available in both samples. Figure 1 shows rates of early sexual activity and
teenage pregnancy in both the U.S. and New
The principal data analyses were based on a series
of regression analyses examining the relations
Zealand samples according to timing of father
between the timing of father absence and the 16
absence: Early father absence (beginning ages 0-5),
late father absence (beginning ages 6-13), and father
dependent variables before and after adjustment for
child, family, and ecological factors. For binary
presence (ages 0-13). For each father-absent and
dependent variables, these analyses were conductedfather-present group, the solid lines in the figure
using logistic regression methods in which the logshow the percentage of girls who had sexual
odds of the dependent variable was modeled asintercourse
a by age 16 and the percentage of girls
linear function of the timing of father absence andwho experienced an adolescent pregnancy. Logistic
covariates (where applicable). The full covariate regression of the data in Figure 1 showed that earlier
adjusted model fitted to the data was of the form: onset of father absence was associated with a
corresponding increase in girls' rates of both early
sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy in bot
logit [pr(Yi)] =BOi + B1iX1 + ,BjiZj
samples. For early sexual activity in the U.S. sample
where logit[pr(Yi)] was the log odds of the ith N = 227, B(SE = .16) = .70, X2 = 20.51, p<.0001, odds
dependent variable, X1 was the continuous measure ratio = 2.01; and for early sexual activity in the Ne
of timing of father absence, and Zj was the set ofZealand sample: N = 520, B(SE = .12) = .76,
child, family, and ecological covariates. The para-X2 = 38.04, p<.0001, odds ratio = 2.14. For adolescent
pregnancy in the U.S. sample: N = 242,
meter Bli represents the effect of father absence on
the log odds of the ith dependent variable. B(SE
A = .23) = 1.15, X2=24.97, p<.0001, odds ra-
tio = 3.15; and for adolescent pregnancy in the
measure of effect size is provided by the odds ratio
between the timing of father absence and the
New Zealand sample: N= 520, B(SE = .19)= 1.16,
dependent variable. The odds ratio represents the
X2= 38.28, p<.0001, odds ratio = 3.19. As expected,
multiplicative effect of a one-unit shift in the three-
early father-absent girls had the highest rates of both
early sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy,
level father absence variable. The corresponding
analyses for the continuous dependent variablefollowed by late father-absent girls, followed by
(GPA) were based on standard linear regression,father-present girls (Figure 1). For example, adoles-
and the measure of effect size is provided by the
cent pregnancy rates were approximately 7 times
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 811
1. .. teenage
1 5% ----- ----------------------------- 15% . .... . G . ..... .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .. ........ b
pregnancy
10% . ............................%................................
o10%..... . .................................. ..................
5% - ----------------- ------------------------- ----- ---- - 5% -
0% I I 0% I I I
Early father- Late father- Father pre- Early father- Late father- Father pre-
absent girls absent girls sent girls absent girls absent girls sent girls
aRates prior to adjustment for covariates. bRates after adjustment for covariates.
Figure 1. Rates of early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy, before and after adjustment for covariates.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
812 Ellis et al.
Table 1
Mean Levels of Child Conduct Problems and Familial and Ecological Stressors by Timing of Father Absence, Early Sexual
Pregnancy: United States and New Zealand
United States
Externalizing problems 0.20 - 0.24 - 0.08 2.86 0.22 - 0.13 6.66* 0.48 - 0.09 10.77***
(ages 4-6)
Mother's age at first birth 20.82 22.30 24.84 19.80*** 22.69 23.63 1.98 21.68 23.51 4.24*
Race (% other) 32% 21% 8% 19.28*** 24% 13% 4.33* 41% 13% 16.65***
SES (ages 4-13) -0.58 -0.07 0.40 28.78*** -0.19 0.18 7.71** - 0.59 0.15 17.48***
Family life stress 0.43 0.23 - 0.35 18.55"*** 0.17 - 0.13 5.30* 0.33 - 0.08 4.38*
(ages 1-5)
Dyadic adjustment - 0.79 0.09 0.42 46.26#* - 0.34 0.27 21.72*** - 0.67 0.15 21.72***
(ages 1-5)
Harsh discipline 0.38 - 0.21 - 0.19 9.00*** 0.22 - 0.14 7.52** 0.58 -0.11 15.76***
(ages 4-5)
Harsh discipline 0.25 - 0.25 - 0.08 3.69* 0.07 - 0.06 0.87 0.45 - 0.07 7.83**
(ages 10-13)
Parental monitoring -0.47 - 0.04 0.30 15.10*** - 0.22 0.21 10.14** - 0.66 0.13 18.67***
(ages 10-13)
Neighborhood danger 0.57 - 0.08 - 0.31 29.39*- 0.20 - 0.13 7.68** 0.55 -0.11 18.10***
(ages 10-13)
New Zealand
Conduct problems 0.38 0.20 -0.11 9.25*** 0.16 - 0.08 6.12* 0.52 - 0.05 12.17***
(age 6)
Mother's age at first birth 21.01 22.70 24.43 27.07m 22.29 24.38 30.47*** 21.67 23.88 11.03***
Race (% Maori/Polynesian) 28% 19% 8% 26.52*** 15% 12% .94 29% 11% 10.63***
Father's occupation (at birth) -0.54 -0.20 0.15 18.84*** -0.32 0.16 27.28*** - 0.63 0.05 18.50***
Mother's education (at birth) -0.46 -0.31 0.15 16.43#* -0.32 0.15 26.93*** -0.54 0.05 13.70***
Standard of living (ages 0-10) - 0.77 - 0.23 0.20 38.27*** - 0.24 0.12 15.43*** - 0.64 0.06 19.67***
Family life stress (ages 0-10) 0.73 0.58 -0.23 42.78*** 0.34 -0.16 27.72*** 0.79 -0.07 26.79***
Mom emotional responsiveness -0.49 -0.07 0.11 12.61m* - 0.16 0.08 6.20* -0.24 0.02 2.59
(age 3)
Mom punitiveness (age 3) 0.40 -0.19 -0.05 8.15*** 0.10 -0.05 2.32 0.48 -0.04 10.14**
Marital conflict (ages 0-10) 1.18 0.59 -0.32 111.10m 0.32 - 0.15 23.87*** 0.86 -0.07 31.71***
Note. All variables standardized, except race and mother's age at first birth. F statistic and p values for comparison
way ANOVA. Comparison of percentages by race are based on the x2 test. For the U.S. sample, Ns = 213-243; for th
Ns = 468-520.
*p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 813
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
814 Ellis et al.
Table 2
Rates of Behavioral Problems and Academic Performance by Timing of Father Absence, Before and After Adjustment for Covariates: United States
Externalizing problems
Mother report 25.6% 10.3% 9.8% .58 (.20) 8.55 .003 1.79
(15.8%) (13.3%) (11.1%) .30 (.36) 0.69 .41 1.35
Child report 15.6% 24.1% 11.3% .20 (.20) 1.02 .31 1.22
(17.5%) (14.7%) (12.3%) .28 (.36) 0.61 .44 1.32
Internalizing problems
Mother report 14.1% 24.1% 12.9% .08 (.20) 0.15 .70 1.08
(14.1%) (13.7%) (13.2%) .05 (.31) 0.02 .89 1.05
Child report 15.6% 27.6% 12.8% .14 (.19) 0.52 .47 1.15
(18.9%) (16.3%) (13.9%) .22 (.31) 0.49 .49 1.24
Violent acts 39.0% 29.6% 15.3% .63 (.17) 14.22 <.001 1.88
(28.1%) (23.8%) (20.1%) .25 (.26) 0.94 .33 1.28
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 815
behavioral and mental health problems, as indicated studied throughout their entire childhoods-e
by both the odds ratios (range = 1.36-1.59) abled and the
us to examine child and family variables th
modest decline in rates of these outcome variables preceded risk for involvement in sexual activity a
across the two father-absent and one father-present pregnancy in adolescence. Finally, the use of mu
groups. Most of these associations obtained at leastple informants, in which antecedent child and fam
marginal statistical significance. data were collected from mothers and adolescent
In sum, in the U.S. sample, after statistically sexual outcome data were collected from daughters,
controlling for all covariates, timing of onset of makes it less likely that the current findings are an
artifact of method variance.
father absence remained strongly associated with
early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy but not
with other behavioral problems and academic
Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk for
performance. Although the direction of the effects
indicated that earlier onset of father absence was Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy?
associated with more behavioral and academic Although the current research cannot demon-
problems in the U.S. sample, the size of the strate
effects
causation, three converging lines of evidence
were small and did not approach statistical signifi-
suggest that the answer to this question is yes. First,
cance. By contrast, in the New Zealand sample, in after
both the U.S. and New Zealand samples, there
statistically controlling for all covariates, there
was awas
dose-response relationship between timing of
still a pattern of at least trend associations between
onset of father absence and early sexual outcomes:
timing of father absence and the measures Earlyof
father-absent girls had the highest rates of both
early sexual activity and adolescent pregnancy,
adolescent adjustment, with odds ratios ranging
followed
from 1.36 to 2.09. Although early sexual activity and by late father-absent girls, followed by
teenage pregnancy occupied the upper endfather-present
of this girls. This dose-response relationship
range, and although the odds ratio for teenagesuggests that past research, which has consistently
pregnancy was substantially higher than treated
for anyfather absence as a dichotomous yes-no
variable,
other variable (+.50 or greater), there was not a clear has underestimated the impact of father
absence
divide between the effects of father absence on earlyon daughters' sexual outcomes. This issue
sexual activity and other behavioral and may mentalbe especially relevant to predicting rates of
health outcomes. Specifically, after covariateteenage
adjust-pregnancy, which were 7 to 8 times higher
ment, the odds ratio for early sexual activity (1.57)
among early father-absent girls, but only 2 to 3 times
was about the same as for conduct disorder (1.59),
higher among late father-absent girls, than among
violent offending (1.56), and no school qualifications
father-present girls.
(1.50). Second, in both the U.S. and New Zealand
samples, father absence constituted a unique and
Discussion independent path to early sexual activity and
adolescent pregnancy. Although measures of early
Does father absence uniquely and discriminantly
conduct problems and life-course adversity covaried
with both
increase daughters' risk for early sexual activity and timing of father absence and adolescent
sexual outcomes, these measures either did not
teenage pregnancy, independent of early externaliz-
account
ing behavior problems and exposure to familial for (in the U.S. sample) or only partially
and
ecological stressors during childhood? In addressingfor (in the New Zealand sample) the links
accounted
this question, the current research hadbetweenseveral father absence and early sexual activity and
important strengths. First, the use of a cross-national
teenage pregnancy. The relations between father
research design enabled us to replicate keyabsence
findingsand teenage pregnancy were particularly
across diverse samples in different countries.
robust.Sec-
For example, after controlling for all of the
ond, in conducting two studies, we were able toearly father-absent girls were still about 5
covariates,
times
carry out independent tests of the hypotheses more likely in the U.S. sample and 3 times
using
more likely
different measures and methods. The similarity in in the New Zealand sample to experi-
results across the U.S. and New Zealand ence an adolescent pregnancy than were father-
samples
underscores the robustness and generalizability of In total, these data suggest that father
present girls.
the findings. Nonetheless, it will be important
absence may
to affect daughters' sexual development
through
replicate these findings in non-Western samples processes that operate independently of life-
(see
Waynforth, 2002). Third, the longitudinal course
nature of
adversity and go beyond mere continuation
the research--in which girls were prospectively
of early conduct problems.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
816 Ellis et al.
Third, in the U.S. sample, father absence was and most parsimonious representation of
best fitting
discriminantly associated with early sexual the associations between father absence and the
activity
and teenage pregnancy. This association was outcome variables. Power would have been low,
specific
to sexual outcomes and, after controlling for however,
early to detect nonlinearity in the U.S. sample
conduct problems and familial and ecological (given the use of dichotomous dependent variables
stressors, did not extend to academic, behavioral,
and the relatively small sample size in the late
or mental health problems more generally. In the group). The base rates shown in Table
father-absent
New Zealand sample, however, the picture2was indicate
less nonlinear trends in the U.S. data, with late
clear. After covariate adjustment, there was still a
father-absent girls displaying higher rates of inter-
pattern of at least trend associations between nalizing
timingproblems (both child and mother reports)
of father absence and the measures of adolescent and externalizing problems (child reports only) than
adjustment, with early sexual activity and adoles-
either early father-absent or father-present girls.
These nonlinear trends did not replicate in the
cent pregnancy occupying the upper end of this
New Zealand data (see Table 3). Nonetheless, the
range of associations. Considering the U.S. and New
Zealand findings together, after controlling possibility
for that late father absence places daughters
measures of early conduct problems and life-course
at special risk for some outcome variables deserves
adversity, the effects of father absence on sex further
and consideration in future research with larger
pregnancy (a) were generally stronger than weresample
the sizes.
effects of father absence on other outcome variables
and (b) clearly replicated across the two studies
whereas other effects of father absence were more Implications for the Life-Course Adversity Model
Table 3
Rates of Behavioral and Mental Health Problems by Timing of Father Absence, Before and After Adjustment for Covariates: New Zealand
Conduct disorder 16.9% 15.8% 4.2% .78 (.19) 17.85 <.001 2.19
(12.6%) (8.5%) (5.7%) .46 (.27) 3.03 .082 1.59
Mood disorder 54.2% 49.1% 31.8% .49 (.12) 17.04 <.001 1.64
(48.1%) (40.9%) (34.1%) .31 (.17) 3.29 .070 1.36
Anxiety disorder 59.0% 54.4% 40.0% .41 (.12) 11.72 .001 1.50
(56.5%) (48.8%) (41.0%) .33 (.17) 3.80 .051 1.39
Violent offending 31.3% 14.0% 9.7% .71 (.15) 23.12 <.001 2.03
(21.4%) (15.2%) (10.5%) .44 (.21) 4.28 .039 1.56
Suicide attempt 14.5% 8.8% 5.3% .56 (.19) 8.33 .004 1.74
(10.9%) (8.3%) (6.3%) .32 (.27) 1.40 .237 1.38
No school qualifications 35.8% 37.5% 9.3% .90 (.14) 41.09 <.001 2.45
(23.7%) (18.5%) (14.1%) .40 (.21) 3.62 .057 1.50
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 817
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
818 Ellis et al.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 819
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
820 Ellis et al.
perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 493-519. Robbins, C., Kaplan, H. B., & Martin, S. S. (1985).
Lee, J. (1981). Covariance adjustment of rates based on the Antecedents of pregnancy among unmarried adoles-
multiple logistic regression model. Journal of Chronic cents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 567-583.
Disease, 34, 415-426. Rodgers, J. L., Rowe, D. C., & Buster, M. (1999). Nature,
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. nurture, and first sexual intercourse in the USA: Fitting
D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of behavioural genetic models to NLSY kinship data.
quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31, 29-41.
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Father Absence 821
adolescent
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Temperament. In W. sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and the
Damon (Ed. in Chief) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.),61, 920-933.
Family,
Handbook of child psychology (pp. 105-176). NewWaynforth,
York: D. (2002). Evolutionary theory and reproduc-
Wiley. tive responses to father absence: Implications of kin
Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, selection and the reproductive returns to mating and
health and behaviour. London: Longmans. parenting effort. In C. Tamis-LeMonda & N. Cabrera
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance (Eds.), Handbook of father involvement (pp. 337-357).
over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
American Sociological Review, 55, 609-627. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1997). Life expectancy, economic
Scaramella, L. V., Conger, R. D., Simons, L., & Whitbeck, L.inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chi-
B. (1998). Predicting risk for pregnancy by late adoles- cago neighbourhoods. British Medical Journal, 314, 1271-
cence: A social contextual perspective. Developmental 1274.
Psychology, 34, 1233-1245. Woodward, L. J., & Fergusson, D. M. (1999). Early conduct
Silverstein, L. B., & Auerbach, C. E (1999). Deconstructing problems and later risk of teenage pregnancy in girls.
the essential father. American Psychologist, 54, 397-407. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 127-141.
Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1987). The influence of the World Health Organization. (1993). Composite International
family on premarital sexual attitudes and behavior.Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva, Switzerland: World
Demography, 24, 323-340. Health Organization.
Upchurch, D. M., Aneshensel, C. S., Sucoff, C. A., & Levy-
Storms, L. (1999). Neighborhood and family contexts of
This content downloaded from 134.117.10.200 on Sun, 14 Aug 2016 16:10:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms