0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views33 pages

Lec 4

The document discusses constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), which are a type of search problem where the goal is to assign values to variables while satisfying constraints. It covers CSP examples like map coloring, N-queens, and Sudoku. Standard search techniques like depth-first search and breadth-first search are not efficient for CSPs. Backtracking search is introduced as the basic algorithm, along with improvements like variable ordering, filtering, and constraint propagation techniques like forward checking and arc consistency.

Uploaded by

Vân Anh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views33 pages

Lec 4

The document discusses constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), which are a type of search problem where the goal is to assign values to variables while satisfying constraints. It covers CSP examples like map coloring, N-queens, and Sudoku. Standard search techniques like depth-first search and breadth-first search are not efficient for CSPs. Backtracking search is introduced as the basic algorithm, along with improvements like variable ordering, filtering, and constraint propagation techniques like forward checking and arc consistency.

Uploaded by

Vân Anh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

CS 188: Artificial Intelligence

Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Instructor: Anca Dragan


University of California, Berkeley
[These slides adapted from Dan Klein and Pieter Abbeel]
Constraint Satisfaction Problems

N variables
domain D
constraints
x2

x1

states goal test successor function


partial assignment complete; satisfies constraints assign an unassigned variable
What is Search For?
o Assumptions about the world: a single agent, deterministic actions, fully
observed state, discrete state space

o Planning: sequences of actions


o The path to the goal is the important thing
o Paths have various costs, depths
o Heuristics give problem-specific guidance

o Identification: assignments to variables


o The goal itself is important, not the path
o All paths at the same depth (for some formulations)
o CSPs are specialized for identification problems
Constraint Satisfaction Problems

o Standard search problems:


o State is a “black box”: arbitrary data structure
o Goal test can be any function over states
o Successor function can also be anything

o Constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs):


o A special subset of search problems
o State is defined by variables Xi with values
from a domain D (sometimes D depends on i)
o Goal test is a set of constraints specifying
allowable combinations of values for subsets of
variables

o Allows useful general-purpose algorithms with


more power than standard search algorithms
CSP Examples
Example: Map Coloring
o Variables:

o Domains:

o Constraints: adjacent regions must have


different colors
Implicit:

Explicit:

o Solutions are assignments satisfying all


constraints, e.g.:
Constraint Graphs
Example: N-Queens
o Formulation 1:
o Variables:
o Domains:
o Constraints
Example: N-Queens

o Formulation 2:
o Variables:

o Domains:

o Constraints:
Implicit:

Explicit:
Example: Cryptarithmetic
X1

o Variables:

o Domains:

o Constraints:
Example: Sudoku
§ Variables:
§ Each (open) square
§ Domains:
§ {1,2,…,9}
§ Constraints:

9-way alldiff for each column


9-way alldiff for each row
9-way alldiff for each region
(or can have a bunch of
pairwise inequality
constraints)
Real-World CSPs
o Assignment problems: e.g., who teaches what class
o Timetabling problems: e.g., which class is offered when and where?
o Hardware configuration
o Transportation scheduling
o Factory scheduling
o Circuit layout
o Fault diagnosis
o … lots more!

o Many real-world problems involve real-valued variables…


Solving CSPs
Standard Search Formulation
o Standard search formulation of CSPs

o States defined by the values assigned


so far (partial assignments)
o Initial state: the empty assignment, {}
o Successor function: assign a value to an
unassigned variable
o Goal test: the current assignment is
complete and satisfies all constraints

o We’ll start with the straightforward,


naïve approach, then improve it
Search Methods
o What would BFS do?

{}
{WA=g} {WA=r} … {NT=g} …

[Demo: coloring -- dfs]


Search Methods
o What would BFS do?

o What would DFS do?


o let’s see!

o What problems does naïve search have?

[Demo: coloring -- dfs]


Video of Demo Coloring -- DFS
Backtracking Search
Backtracking Search
o Backtracking search is the basic uninformed algorithm for solving CSPs
o Idea 1: One variable at a time
o Variable assignments are commutative, so fix ordering -> better branching factor!
o I.e., [WA = red then NT = green] same as [NT = green then WA = red]
o Only need to consider assignments to a single variable at each step

o Idea 2: Check constraints as you go


o I.e. consider only values which do not conflict previous assignments
o Might have to do some computation to check the constraints
o “Incremental goal test”

o Depth-first search with these two improvements


is called backtracking search (not the best name)
o Can solve n-queens for n » 25
Backtracking Example

[Demo: coloring -- backtracking]


Video of Demo Coloring – Backtracking
Backtracking Search

o Backtracking = DFS + variable-ordering + fail-on-


violation
o What are the choice points?
Improving Backtracking

o General-purpose ideas give huge gains in speed

o Ordering:
o Which variable should be assigned next?
o In what order should its values be tried?

o Filtering: Can we detect inevitable failure early?


Filtering

Keep track of domains for unassigned variables and cross off bad options
Filtering: Forward Checking
o Filtering: Keep track of domains for unassigned variables and cross off bad
options
o Forward checking: Cross off values that violate a constraint when added to the
existing assignment

NT Q
WA
SA NSW
V

[Demo: coloring -- forward checking]


Video of Demo Coloring – Backtracking with Forward
Checking
Filtering: Constraint Propagation
o Forward checking propagates information from assigned to unassigned
variables, but doesn't provide early detection for all failures:

NT Q
WA
SA
NSW
V

o NT and SA cannot both be blue!


o Why didn’t we detect this yet?
o Constraint propagation: reason from constraint to constraint
Consistency of A Single Arc
o An arc X ® Y is consistent iff for every x in the tail there is some y in the head
which could be assigned without violating a constraint

NT Q
WA
SA
NSW
V

Delete from the tail!


Forward checking?
Enforcing consistency of arcs pointing to each new assignment
Arc Consistency of an Entire CSP
o A simple form of propagation makes sure all arcs are consistent:

NT Q
WA SA
NSW
V

o Important: If X loses a value, neighbors of X need to be rechecked!


o Arc consistency detects failure earlier than forward checking
Remember: Delete
o Can be run as a preprocessor or after each assignment from the tail!
o What’s the downside of enforcing arc consistency?
Enforcing Arc Consistency in a CSP

o Runtime: O(n2d3), can be reduced to O(n2d2)


o … but detecting all possible future problems is NP-hard – why?
Limitations of Arc Consistency

o After enforcing arc


consistency:
o Can have one solution left
o Can have multiple solutions
left
o Can have no solutions left
(and not know it)

o Arc consistency still runs


inside a backtracking search! [Demo: coloring -- forward checking]
[Demo: coloring -- arc consistency]
Video of Demo Coloring – Backtracking with Forward
Checking – Complex Graph
Video of Demo Coloring – Backtracking with Arc
Consistency – Complex Graph

You might also like