ESS Availability OdeiReyOrozko

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS AT ESS:

EXCEL-BASED MODEL

Odei Rey Orozko


CERN, 2014-04-29
CONTENT

• Overview on Reliability Analysis

• Overall Reliability Goal for ESS

• Overview on the Statistical model

• How the Excel based model works

• Example: Outcome and interpretation


OVERVIEW ON RELIABILITY ANALYSIS

Base
• Reliability Analysis - November 2012 - Rebecca Seviour.
• All systems were listed in one excel file - 600 lines.
• Different types of redundancy and repair cases were assumed to fine-tune the
overall LINAC reliability and availability numbers.
• Mission time = 144 h = 6 days.

Preliminary Reliability Analysis: Excel based model


• Created one excel file per system.
• Removed redundancy and repair assumptions.
• Mission time = 1h according to input from XFWG on reliability (more later).
• Identify failure rate/MTBF data source.
• Identify and redefine structures and formulas behind.
• Created statistical macro that calculates the overall reliability and availability
numbers and creates a structure graph of the system.
OVERVIEW ON RELIABILITY ANALYSIS

Why Excel-Based Model as a Preliminary Analysis?

• Excel is accessible to everyone

• No need of previous knowledge in reliability analysis

• Good starting point for design issues and data


collection

• This preliminary analysis can be used after in more


sophisticated software by experts
OVERALL RELIABILITY GOAL FOR ESS

Preliminary Allocation:

Accelerator Target Controls NSS


1 hour 95.5% 99.9% 99.7% 99% (per
Reliability instrument)
Availability 95% (SNS 97% 99.7% 99%
92%) (averaged
over suite)

• The ESS goal is to achieve an overall reliability of 95%.

• Time interval was chosen to be 1 hour, due to length of user-


experiments.

• Accelerator numbers are already in AD requirements documents. Other


allocations have to be confirmed.

• The Accelerator is considered to be OFF (ie downtime) if beam power is


less than 50% of currently scheduled power for more than 1 minute.
OVERVIEW ON THE STATISTICAL MODEL

• The model differentiates three cases / designs /


structures.

• For each case, a different:

 Approach is used for the calculations.

 Input data-set is needed.


OVERVIEW ON THE STATISTICAL MODEL

INPUT:
Mechanical
CASE 1: SCRF Cavity Tuner Assembly Vacuum Valve

- MTBF
- Percent of Anticipated
Failures
- No. of Equip.
- MTTR
SCRF Cavity / Tuner Assembly / Vacuum Valve / Cryostat
Module Module Module structure

CASE 2:

- No. of Equip.

CASE 3: CRYOSTAT

No input data needed!


OVERVIEW ON THE STATISTICAL MODEL

OUTPUT:
• Failure rate • Mean Down Time (MDT)
• Effective MTBF for Unanticipated • Steady State Availability
Failure • Reliability for Mission Time
• Effective Failure rate
• Effective Total Failure Rate

Which formulas are used on the statistical model?

 Depending on the case, redundancy and repair values


 For example, for Reliability and Availability…
OVERVIEW ON THE STATISTICAL MODEL

FORMULAS FOR AVAILABILITY AND REALIABILITY:


C AS E 1 a n d n o u s e o f a d d i t i o n a l c o m p o n e n t s !
EXAMPLES: MAGNETS

Magnets – DUMP LINES


THANK YOU!

Odei Rey Orozko


[email protected]
HOW THE MACRO WORKS

When clicking the ANALYSIS button:

 Read input data.


• From the user: the corresponding cell in the file.
• From another system’s calculations: file name in column “H”.

 Fills cells in grey where the user must enter the input data.

 Checks if input data is missing.


• If input is missing, error message!
• If not, continue to analysis?

 Analysis: Calculates all numbers according to the statistical model.

 Graph? If yes, creates a structure graph of the system in the second


sheet of the same file.
RELIABILITY / AVAILABILITY MACROS

Case: No use of additional components.

AVAILABILITY MACRO:

RELIABILITY MACRO:
BASIC CONCEPTS: REDUNDANCY

Redundancy:
The use of additional components or sub-systems beyond the
number actually required for the system to operate reliably/available.

For improving the


Reliability/Availability C1 C2

C1 C2

C1 C2
Consider a system with two
elements C1 and C2.
A similar system in parallel is added to
the existing one.
BASIC CONCEPTS: REDUNDANCY

Redundancies can be categorized as ACTIVE or PASSIVE (STAND-BY).


ACTIVE redundancy :
• All redundant components are in operation and sharing the load with the main component.
• Upon failure of one component, the surviving components carry the load.

PASSIVE or STAND BY redundancy:


• All redundant components remain dormant until needed.
• The redundant components systems start operating only when one or more failures occur.

Active Passive

A A

Switch
B B

Reliability/Availability (ACTIVE) << Reliability/Availability (PASSIVE)


BASIC CONCEPTS: REDUNDANCY

ACTIVE << PASSIVE


• Assume Avail(A)=Avail(B)=Avail(C)=Avail(D).
• Components A, B and C start operating at t=0.
• Component D does not start operating until C fails.
• Hence, system with Passive redundancy should have a higher availability.

A
Component A
Active
Component B
B

C
Component C
Passive Switch
Component D
D
t=0 t=Failure of Component C and A

You might also like