Bongalon vs. People GR169533 March 20, 2013 Case Digest

Bongalon vs.
People GR169533 March 20, 2013

FACTS:
Version of the Prosecution
The Prosecution showed that on May 11, 2002, Jayson Dela Cruz (Jayson) and Roldan, his older brother, both
minors, joined the evening procession for the Santo Niño at Oro Site in Legazpi City; that when the procession
passed in front of the petitioner’s house, the latter’s daughter Mary Ann Rose, also a minor, threw stones at
Jayson and called him "sissy"; that the petitioner confronted Jayson and Roldan and called them names like
"strangers" and "animals"; that the petitioner struck Jayson at the back with his hand, and slapped Jayson on the
face;4 that the petitioner then went to the brothers’ house and challenged Rolando dela Cruz, their father, to a
fight, but Rolando did not come out of the house to take on the petitioner; that Rolando later brought Jayson to
the Legazpi City Police Station and reported the incident; that Jayson also underwent medical treatment at the
Bicol Regional Training and Teaching Hospital;5 that the doctors who examined Jayson issued two medical
certificates attesting that Jayson suffered the following contusions, to wit: (1) contusion .5 x 2.5 scapular area,
left; and (2) +1x1 cm. contusion left zygomatic area and contusion .5 x 2.33 cm. scapular area, left.
Version of the Accused
On his part, the petitioner denied having physically abused or maltreated Jayson. He explained that he only
talked with Jayson and Roldan after Mary Ann Rose and Cherrylyn, his minor daughters, had told him about
Jayson and Roldan’s throwing stones at them and about Jayson’s burning Cherrylyn’s hair. He denied shouting
invectives at and challenging Rolando to a fight, insisting that he only told Rolando to restrain his sons from
harming his daughters.7
To corroborate the petitioner’s testimony, Mary Ann Rose testified that her father did not hit or slap but only
confronted Jayson, asking why Jayson had called her daughters "Kimi" and why he had burned Cherrlyn’s hair.
Mary Ann Rose denied throwing stones at Jayson and calling him a "sissy." She insisted that it was instead
Jayson who had pelted her with stones during the procession. She described the petitioner as a loving and
protective father.
RTC RULING:
After trial, the RTC found and declared the petitioner guilty of child abuse as charged, to wit:9
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing considerations, judgment is hereby rendered finding the accused
GEORGE BONGALON @ "GI" GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of Violation of Republic Act No. 7610
("Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act."), and is hereby
ordered to undergo imprisonment of six (6) years and one (1) day to eight (8) years of prision mayor in its
minimum period.
SO ORDERED.
CA RULING:
On appeal, the petitioner assailed the credibility of the Prosecution witnesses by citing their inconsistencies. He
contended that the RTC overlooked or disregarded material facts and circumstances in the records that would
have led to a favorable judgment for him. He attacked the lack of credibility of the witnesses presented against
him, citing the failure of the complaining brothers to react to the incident, which was unnatural and contrary to
human experience.
The CA affirmed the conviction, but modified the penalty, viz:
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the decision dated October 20, 2003 of the Regional Trial Court, Branch
9 of Legazpi City is hereby AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION in that accused-appellant George Bongalon is
sentenced to suffer the indeterminate penalty of (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day of prision
correccional, as minimum term, to six (6) years, eight (8) months and 1 day of prision mayor as the maximum
term.
Further, accused-appellant is ordered to pay the victim, Jayson de la Cruz the additional amount of ₱5,000 as
moral damages.
SUPREME COURT RULING:
Child abuse, the crime charged, is defined by Section 3 (b) of Republic Act No. 7610, as follows:
Section 3. Definition of terms. –
xxxx
(b) "Child Abuse" refers to the maltreatment, whether habitual or not, of the child which includes any of the
following:
(1) Psychological and physical abuse, neglect, cruelty, sexual abuse and emotional maltreatment;
(2) Any act by deeds or words which debases, degrades or demeans the intrinsic worth and dignity of a child as
a human being;
(3) Unreasonable deprivation of his basic needs for survival, such as food and shelter; or
(4) Failure to immediately give medical treatment to an injured child resulting in serious impairment of his
growth and development or in his permanent incapacity or death.
Although we affirm the factual findings of fact by the RTC and the CA to the effect that the petitioner struck
Jayson at the back with his hand and slapped Jayson on the face, we disagree with their holding that his acts
constituted child abuse within the purview of the above-quoted provisions. The records did not establish
beyond reasonable doubt that his laying of hands on Jayson had been intended to debase the "intrinsic worth
and dignity" of Jayson as a human being, or that he had thereby intended to humiliate or embarrass Jayson. The
records showed the laying of hands on Jayson to have been done at the spur of the moment and in anger,
indicative of his being then overwhelmed by his fatherly concern for the personal safety of his own minor
daughters who had just suffered harm at the hands of Jayson and Roldan. With the loss of his self-control,
he lacked that specific intent to debase, degrade or demean the intrinsic worth and dignity of a child as a human
being that was so essential in the crime of child abuse.
It is not trite to remind that under the well-recognized doctrine of pro reo every doubt is resolved in favor of the
petitioner as the accused. Thus, the Court should consider all possible circumstances in his favor.18
What crime, then, did the petitioner commit?
Considering that Jayson’s physical injury required five to seven days of medical attention,19 the petitioner was
liable for slight physical injuries under Article 266 (1) of the Revised Penal Code
WHEREFORE, we SET ASIDE the decision of the Court of Appeals; and ENTER a new judgment: (a) finding
petitioner George Bongalon GUlLTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of SLIGHT PHYSICAL
INJURIES under paragraph 1, Article 266, of the Revised Penal Code; (b) sentencing him to suffer the penalty
of 10 days of arresto menor; and (c) ordering him to pay Jayson Dela Cruz the amount of ₱5,000.00 as moral
damages, plus the costs of suit.

Bongalon vs. People GR169533 March 20, 2013 Case Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bongalon vs. People GR169533 March 20, 2013 Case Digest

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bongalon vs. People GR169533 March 20, 2013 Case Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bongalon vs.

People GR169533 March 20, 2013

You might also like