Pharmaco Kinetics
Pharmaco Kinetics
Importance of PK
ADME processes
2
Definition :
the study of the rates of the transfer process associated with
drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion
(What the body do to the drug).
3
Pharmacokinetics
Drug in GIT
Absorpti
on
Drug in blood
Distribution
Drug in tissues
Drug metabolites Drug in urine/bile
Drug at receptor
Pharmacodynamics
5
The phenomena where the concentration of a drug is
greatly reduced before it reaches the circulatory system
reducing drug bioavailability.
7
8
This refers to the circulation of drugs from the liver to
the bile, then to the small intestine, followed by
reabsorption again through the enterocyte (often by the
bacterial help) and transport back to circulation and liver.
Drugs may be toxic as they reach unexpectedly high
concentrations.
Enterohepatic circulation increase plasma
concentration of drugs like oral contraceptive, estrogen
9
10
Also called multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1)
An important efflux protein of the cell membrane that pumps
many foreign substances out of cells.
Found in:
intestinal epithelium (decrease drug bioavailability)
liver cells (remove drug in bile)
proximal tubule of the kidney (remove drug in urine)
endothelial cells composing the blood–brain barrier
(preventing entry to the brain)
Some cancer cells (preventing drug entry causing cancer
multi-drug resistant).
11
12
13
After absorption to blood stream, drug is rapidly
distributed into the interstitial and intercellular fluids
14
Plasma proteins bound to many drugs. This bounded
drugs have no action at receptor site and only
unbounded fraction has a pharmacological action
15
16
Metabolism of drug occur mainly in the liver
17
18
Excretion is the irreversible removal of drug from
the body and commonly occurs via the kidney or
biliary tract.
Kidney is the main organ for excretion of drugs and
their metabolites
19
is the discipline that applies pharmacokinetic concepts
and principles in humans in order to design
individualized dosage regimens which optimize the
therapeutic response of a medication while
minimizing the chance of an adverse drug reaction.
20
Receptor sites of drugs are generally inaccessible to our
observations or are widely distributed in the body, and
therefore direct measurement of drug concentrations at
these sites is not practical.
we cannot directly sample drug concentration in this tissue.
However, we can measure drug concentration in the blood
or plasma, urine, saliva, and other easily sampled fluids.
21
Differences in an individual's ability to metabolize and
eliminate the drug (e.g., genetics)
Drug interactions
22
is the study of the sources of variability in the drug
pharmacokinetic behavior among individuals who are the
target patient population.
24
1. Design and Evaluation of Dosage Forms
2. Evaluation of Drug Formulation
3. Pharmacological Testing
4. Toxicological Testing
5. Evaluation of Organ Function
6. Dosing Regimen Design
25
is defined as the use of assay procedures for
determination of drug concentrations in plasma, and
the interpretation and application of the resulting
concentration data to develop safe and effective drug
regimens.
26
If performed properly, this process allows for the
achievement of therapeutic concentrations of a drug
more rapidly and safely than can be attained with
empiric dose changes.
27
is defined as the use of assay procedures for determination
of drug concentrations in plasma, and the interpretation and
application of the resulting concentration data to develop
safe and effective drug regimens.
28
1. Some drug have narrow therapeutic window (NTW)
31
Plasma concentration is the simplest widely used
method to evaluate the therapeutic and toxic effect of
the drug.
The changes in drug concentration are as following:
A- An increase in the amount of drug in the body
(absorption)
B- A decrease in the amount of drug in the body
(metabolism and excretion)
C- No change in the amount of drugs in the body
(distribution)
32
33
Some drugs are administered IV, so these agents have
no absorptive phase associated with their
pharmacokinetic profile.
34
1-Concentration response plot: increase concentration
increase response till reaching maximal response (
Most drugs)
35
The response not related to the dose, the cause may be:
a- counterclockwise hysteresis due to increased sensitivity
or formation of active metabolite
36
37
• Three new drug for treating diabetes were
introduced in the market. The following table represent
the relation between the plasma concentration and the
drug effects as indicated by the decrease in blood glucose
level
• For each drug determine the pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamics interface after plotting the
concentration effect graph
38
39
Rate:The velocity with which a reaction or a process occurs
is called as its rate.
Drug A Drug B
40
The rate of forward reaction is expressed as: -dA/dt
Negative sign indicates that the concentration of drug A
decreases with time t. As the reaction proceeds, the
concentration of drug B increases and the rate of
reaction can also be expressed as: dB/dt
dC/dt = -KCn
rate constant = K
order of reaction = n
41
If n = 0, equation becomes:
dC/dt = -Ko where
42
Zero-order process can be defined as the one whose
rate is independent of the concentration of drug
undergoing reaction i.e. the rate of reaction cannot
be increased further by increasing the concentration
of reactants. Finally
C = Co – Kot
43
If a graph constructed by plotting the concentration of
drug versus time, it will yield a straight line.
44
45
Half-life (t½) or half-time is defined as the time
period required for the concentration of drug to
decrease by one-half.
t1/2 = Co / 2 Ko
Half-life (t½) is dependent on drug concentration.
46
1. Metabolism/protein-drug binding/enzyme or carrier-
mediated transport under saturated conditions. The rate
of metabolism, binding or transport of drug remains
constant as long as its concentration is in excess of
saturating concentration.
47
Example: The administration of a 1000 mg of drug X
resulted in the following concentrations:
Time Conc. (mg/L)
0 100
4 90
6 85
10 75
12 70
49
From the equation displayed on the figure (intercept =
100, slope = -2.5)
Slope = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
The elimination rate constant is 2.5 mg/hr
50
If n = 1, equation becomes:
dC/dt = - K Cn
where K = first-order rate constant (in
time-1or per hour)
51
By integration:
C = C o – e –Kt
ln C = ln Co - K t
N.B.: 2.303 log N = ln N
log C = log Co – Kt /2.303
The first-order process is also called as
monoexponential rate process. Thus, a first-order
process is characterized by logarithmic or exponential
kinetics i.e. a constant fraction of drug undergoes
reaction per unit time.
52
Slope = t1/2 = ln 2/K
t1/2 = 0.693 / K
. 53
From equation shows that, in contrast to zero-order
process, the half-life of a first-order process is a
constant and independent of initial drug
concentration i.e. irrespective of what the initial drug
concentration is, the time required for the concentration
to decrease by one-half remains the same.
Most pharmacokinetic processes including
absorption, distribution and *elimination follow
first-order kinetics.
54
First order Zero order
Elimination rate depend on the amount of the drug Elimination rate is constant
dA/dt =-KA (dA/dt) = -K0
Elimination rate constant K (Constant) Elimination rate constant K0 (Constant)
Depend on the amount of the drug remaining Doesn’t depend on the amount of the drug
dA/dt = -KA dA/dt = -K
Ln A = ln Ao – Kt A= Ao-Kt
- Curved line on the rectangular coordinate Linear line on the rectangular coordinate graph
graph paper paper
Linear line on semi log paper -
T 1/2 = ln 2/K = 0.693/K T 1/2 = 0.5 Ao/K
Constant Depends on the amount remaining
K hr-1 K (mg/hr)
Intercept: Log Ao Intercept: Ao
K0 & k is constant in zero and 1st order for the
same drug and the same patient
55
the drug distributes instantaneously and
homogenously throughout the compartment. Drug
elimination also occurs from the compartment
immediately after injection. 56
The one-compartment open model offers the simplest
way to describe the process of drug distribution and
elimination in the body. This model assumes that the
drug can enter or leave the body (ie, the model is
"open"), and the body acts like a single, uniform
compartment.
57
1. Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd)
2. Elimination rate constant (K)
3. Elimination half life (t1/2)
4. Clearance (Cl)
Vd= 10 L
Vd= 100 L
58
is a hypothetical volume that relates drug serum
concentrations to the amount of drug in the body.
Thus, the dimension of volume of distribution is in
volume units, such as L or mL.
At any given time after drug has been absorbed from
extravascular sites and the serum and tissue drug
concentrations are in equilibrium, the serum
concentration for a drug (C) is equal to the quotient of
the amount of drug in the body (A) and the volume of
distribution: C = A/Vd
59
The volume of distribution can be: very small if the drug
is primarily contained in the blood (warfarin V = 5–7 L),
or very large if the drug distributes widely in the body and
is mostly bound to bodily tissues (digoxin V = 500 L).
Volume of distribution is an important pharmacokinetic
parameter because it determines the loading dose (LD) that
is required to achieve a particular steady-state drug
concentration immediately after the dose is administered:
LD = Css Vd
60
- Lipid solubility of drug
- Degree of plasma protein binding
- Affinity for different tissue proteins
- Fat : lean body mass
- Disease like Congestive Heart Failure (CHF),
uremia, cirrhosis
61
Demographic data of patient
age, weight, gender, etc.
Medical condition
renal failure, liver failure, heart failure, etc.
NB :
most patients will not actually attain steady state after a
loading dose, but, hopefully, serum drug concentrations
will be high enough so that the patient will experience
the pharmacological effect of the drug.
62
1. Plot log(C) vs. time
2. Plot the best-fit line
3. Extrapolate to the Y-axis intercept (to estimate
initial concentration, C0)
4. Estimate Vd:
!
Vd =
"
7
Log Co
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.2
6
Log Co
5.8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time 63
The half-life describes how quickly drug serum
concentrations decrease in a patient after a medication
is administered
dimension of half-life is time (hour, minute, day, etc.).
With first-order elimination, the rate of elimination is
directly proportional to the serum drug concentration.
There is a linear relationship between rate of
elimination and serum drug concentration.
The elimination rate constant (K) represents the
fraction of drug eliminated per unit of time.
64
In first-order elimination, the rate of elimination is directly proportional
to the serum drug concentration.
The elimination rate constant (K) represents the fraction of drug
eliminated per unit of time.
For first-order kinetics:
dC/dt = - K C
By integration:
C = C o – e –Kt
ln C = ln Co - K t
N.B.: 2.303 log N = ln N
log C = log Co – Kt/2.303
65
Slope =
66
* The half-life and elimination rate constant are
known as dependent parameters because their values
depend on the clearance (TBC) and volume of
distribution (Vd) of the agent:
t1/2 = (0.693 ⋅ Vd)/Cl as K = TBC/Vd.
67
Clearance is the volume of serum or blood
completely cleared of the drug per unit time.
TBC = K . Vd
$%& ' ( /*+&
MD = Css ⋅ TBC
Clearance (TBC) is the most important
pharmacokinetic parameter because it determines
the maintenance dose (MD) that is required to obtain
a given steady-state serum concentration (Css)
This range of steady-state concentrations is known
as the therapeutic range for the drug.
68
an initial guideline for drug concentrations in a
specific patient
For example, the therapeutic range for theophylline
is generally accepted as 10–20 μg/mL for the treatment
of asthma. If it were known that the theophylline
clearance for a patient equaled 3 L/h and the desired
steady-state theophylline serum concentration was 10
μg/mL, the theophylline maintenance dose to achieve
this concentration would be 30 mg/h.
69
Fraction of dose remaining is given by the following
equation (F = X(t)/X0), where X(t): the amount at
any time & X0: the amount at zero time.
One half life later, 1/2 of the dose will remain. After
additional half life (1/4 of the dose will remain)… and
so on. A simple equation that relates the fraction
remaining of intravenous bolus dose (Q) which is left
71
◦ Calculate the plasma concentration at 3 h
2. Duration of Action
Example 2: Continuing with the drug used in
Example 1, if the therapeutic range is between 5 and
0.3 mg/L, how long are the plasma concentrations in
the therapeutic range?
72
As indicated in the diagram C0 =1 mg/L. Thus, at
time zero the plasma concentration is in the therapeutic
range. The plasma concentration will remain
therapeutic until it falls to the MEC (0.3 mg/L). At
what time does this occur?
1 90.0
2 68.0
4 40.0
6 21.5
8 12.0
10 7.0
75
Calculate the biological half-life of the drug
elimination (t½), the overall elimination rate constant
(K), the volume (Vd), the coefficient of distribution and
the duration of action (td)
76
K Slope 2.303
1
(0.13481) (2.303) 0.286 hr
the biological half-life of the drug elimination (t½):
77
the coefficient of distribution = Vd/wt =83 L/ 72
kg= 1.15 L/kg
The duration of action (td). td is the time needed for
the concentration to get to 50 ng/ml :
78
Example 5:
An adult male patient was given the first dose of an antibiotic at
6:00 AM. At 12:00 noon the plasma level of the drug was measured
and reported as 5 µg/ml. The drug is known to follow the one
compartment model with a half-life of 6 hours. The recommended
dosage regimen of this drug is 250 mg q.i.d. the minimum inhibitory
concentration is 3 µg/ml. Calculate the following:
• Apparent volume of distribution
• Duration of action of the first dose
• Total body clearance
• Fraction of the dose in the body 5 hours after the injection
• Total amount in the body 5 hours after the injection
• Cumulative amount eliminated 5 hours after the injection
• Total amount in the body immediately after injection of a second
dose at 12:00 noon
• Duration of action of first dose only if dose administered at 6:00
AM was 500 mg.
79
Elimination rate constant:
Initial concentration:
• The conc. at 12:00 noon (6 hrs after the first dose)
is 5 µg/ml:
80
Apparent volume of distribution: C(t=6hrs)= 5 ug/ml. Since
the half-life is 6 hrs, C0 = 10 ug/ml.
81
Fraction of the dose in the body 5 hours after the
injection
82
The main advantage for giving a drug by IV infusion
is that
(1) IV infusion allows precise control of plasma drug
concentrations to fit the individual needs of the patient.
83
(3) The IV infusion of drugs, such as antibiotics, may
be given with IV fluids that include electrolytes and
nutrients.
84
At steady state, the rate of drug leaving the body is equal
to the rate of drug (infusion rate) entering the body.
at steady state, the rate of change in the plasma drug
concentration, dA/dt = 0, The steady state principle is also
known the plateau principle.
Rate of in = rate of out
Infusion rate = elimination rate
R Or K0 = K Ass = K.Vd Css = TBC. Css
This relationship shows that the plasma concentration at
steady state is proportional to the rate of infusion (i.e. the
higher the rate of infusion, the higher the SS plasma conc.)
and inversely proportional to drug clearance (i.e. the higher
the drug clearance, the lower the SS plasma conc.).
85
During infusion (Before steady state)
Or Cp= K0/TBC
88
89
Fraction achieved of steady state concentration (Fss)
t
1 t 0. 5 Fss 1e
Kt
OR Fss 1
2
Time needed to achieve steady state: time needed to get to a certain fraction of
steady state depends on the half-life of the drug (not the infusion rate)
90
• Example: What is the minimum number of half-lives
needed to achieve at least 95% of steady state?
92
when immediate drug effect is required and immediate
achievement of therapeutic drug concentrations is necessary
such as in emergency situations
In this ease, administration of a loading dose will be necessary.
93
To achieve a target steady state conc (Css) the following
equations can be used:
– For the infusion rate:
95
The rate of infusion of a drug is sometimes changed
during therapy because of excessive toxicity or an
inadequate therapeutic response. If the object of the
change is to produce a new plateau, then the time to go
from one plateau to another whether higher or lower
depends solely on the half-life of the drug.
96
K can be estimated using post infusion data by:
– Plotting log(Conc) vs. time
– From the slope estimate K:
97
If you did not reached steady state (C* = CSS(1-e-kT)):
98
Example:
Following a two-hour infusion of 100 mg/hr plasma
was collected and analysed for drug concentration.
Calculate k and V.
99
Post infusion data
1.2
1
y = -0.0378x + 1.1144
R2 = 0.9664
Log(Conc) mg/L
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hr)
10
0
• From the slope, K is estimated to be:
10
1
CONTENTS
• Dosage regimen
• Objectives of dose regimen
• Therapeutic drug monitoring
• Multiple dosage regimen
• Multiple dosing with respect to I.V.
• Multiple dosing with respect to Oral route.
• Concept of loading dose, maintenance dose.
• Drug accumulation
102
Dosage regimen
It is defined as the manner in which a drug is
taken.
For certain analgesics, hypnotics, anti-emetics etc. a
single dose may provide an effective treatment.
But the duration of most illness is longer than the
therapeutic effect produced by a single dose.
10
4
When the duration of treatment of disease is larger than
the therapeutic effect of drug, Multiple dosage regimen
are given e.g. antibiotics
10
5
When an oral multiple dosing regimen is followed,
plasma conc. will increase, reach a maximum and
begin to decline. A 2nd dose will be administered
before all of the absorbed drug from 1st dose is
eliminated.
Consequently plasma conc. resulting from 2nd dose
will be higher than from 1st dose. This increase in conc.
with dose will continue to occur until a steady state is
reach at which rate of drug entry into the body = rate
of exit
10
6
10
7
Multiple dosing with respect to I.V.
On repeated drug administration, the plasma conc.
will be added upon for each dose interval giving a
plateau or steady state with the plasma conc.
fluctuating between a minimum and maximum
10
8
10
9
when the drug dose is administered at the beginning
of the dosing interval and the drug concentration
increases from Cpmin ss to Cpmax ss, the drug
concentration has to return back to Cpmin at the end of
the dosing interval.
11
0
For a drug that is eliminated by first-
order process during multiple IV administration
of similar doses, D, administered every fixed dosing
interval, τ, the amount of drug in the body after
administration of the first dose is D. The amount of the
drug in the body before administration of the second
dose is De− kτ. If this continued, At steady state the
amount of the drug in the body after drug
administration, A∞ max = D (1+e− kτ+ De− 2kτ.+ De−
3kτ+De−4 kτ.
11
1
After single rapid IV injection,
DB = D0e-k t
If the τ is the dosing interval, then amount
of drug
remaining in the body after several hr,
DB= D0e-k τ
The fraction of the Dose remaining in the
body
f = DB/D0 = e -k τ 11
2
This is an infinite series that can be solved as
A∞ max 234
1
A∞ min A∞ max . 7 89
11
3
'
=>∞ ?@A EF
BCD
=>∞ ?GH =>∞ ?@A . E
' (
=>∞ IJ =>∞ ?GH
BC
similar group of expressions can be written to relate the
maximum and minimum plasma drug concentration at
steady state dur-ing multiple extravascular drug
administration when the drug absorption is rapid:
K'
=>∞ ?@A 2 EF
BCD
K' (
And & ∞ IJ & ∞ ILM
BC
11
4
There are two main parameters that can be adjusted in
developing a dosage regimen:
(1) The size o f the drug dose
115
Drug Accumulation –
11
6
•The degree of fluctuation depends on the dosage size,
the dosing interval, the absorption rate if given IM, or
oral, and the disposition rate of the drug.
11
7
3. the drug has to be repeatedly admin-istered for a
period equal to five to six half-lives to achieve steady
state. The longer the drug half-life the longer it takes to
reach steady state.
11
8
The loading dose is a dose larger than the
maintenance dose administered at the initiation of
therapy to achieve faster approach to steady state
11
9
The loading dose is calculated from the desired plasma
drug concentration and the Vd of the drug. The
desired drug concentration is usually a drug concentration
within the therapeutic range:
Loading dose = Cp desired × Vd
Oral Loading Dose
Loading dose=(Cp desired ×Vd)/F
The average steady-state plasma drug
concentration is dependent on the dosing rate
(FD/τ) and the total body clearance of the drug.
Again, the loading dose does not affect the
steady-state concentration. 12
0
Is the difference between the MEC and the MTC is
large or small (therapeutic index)? (if small
therapeutic index exists, frequent administration of
small doses will be necessary to avoid large
fluctuation in plasma concentration)
Is there a compliance problem with the drug? So,
reducing frequency may be recommended
Is there a delayed response or tolerance to the action
of the drug as therapy progress? This will require
periodic evaluation of the pharmacological
response.
12
1
Is the drug used in situations that require an
immediate effect? This will require the
administration of loading dose.
Does the drug have a long or short half-life? This
will determine the frequency of administration
(dosing interval Ʈ)
Is the elimination of the drug affected by age or by
disease state? this will determine the dose according
to the patient condition.
12
2
this equation represents the relationship between
the rate of dosing (FD/τ) and the Average
concentration in the body during dosing interval at
steady state:
123
Average concentration at steady state:
12
4
- The time required to reach to a certain fraction of the
steady-state level is given by:
12
5
Drug kinetic following
single oral dose
Dr. Mahmoud Samy
Lecturer of Clinical Pharmacy
Outlines
Calculate plasma drug concentration at any given time after
the administration of an extravascular dose of drug.
Employ residual method & extrapolation techniques to
characterize the absorption phase
Absorption Elimination
Drug in the body
process (Ka) (X) process (K)
dX
KaXa KX
dt
X: drug amount in the body, Xa: drug amount in
the GI available for absorption, K: elimination
rate constant, and Ka: absorption rate constant
Mathematical model
Assuming first-order absorption and first-order
elimination, the amount of drug (Ao or Xo or D)
in the body is described by:
KaFA
Cp
Vd ( Ka K )
e
Kt
e Kat
F (Bioavailability): Fraction of the dose that
reach systemic circulation
At time zero, no drug in blood (Cpo= zero)
Determination of the Model
Parameters
K
Elimination half life
Ka
Absorption half life
tmax and Cmax
Clearance
Volume of distribution
AUC
Oral absorption
KaFXo
Cp
Vd ( Ka K )
e Kt
e Kat
This portion measure This portion measure
the elimination process the absorption process
Terminal phase (elimination)
Because in the
Elimination phase no
significant absorption
occur (only elimination
process), the plasma
concentration
equation can be
simplified into:
KaFXo
Cp
Vd ( Ka K )
e Kt
Method of residuals
The method of residuals is a graphical method used
to determine the drug absorption rate constant and
has the following assumptions:
The absorption rate constant is larger than the elimination rate
constant ,that is, Ka>K.
Both drug absorption and elimination follow first-order kinetics
The drug pharmacokinetics follow one-compartment model
The idea of the method of residuals is to characterize the
drug elimination rate from the terminal elimination phase
of the plasma drug concentration—time profile after a
single oral administration.
Then the contribution of the drug absorption rate and the
drug elimination rate during the absorption phase can be
separated
Method of residuals
1. The plasma drug concentration is plotted against their
corresponding time values on the semi-log scale
2. The slope of the line that represents the elimination phase is
calculated. The slope of this line is equal to –k/2.303. The
terminal line is back extrapolated to the y-axis
Terminal line
Method of residuals
2- Construct the residual line by taking the difference
between the terminal line and the observed conc.
Residual line
Method of residuals
3- Estimate the absorption rate constant from the slope of
the residual line
Residual line
Example
After oral administration of a single dose of an
antibiotic, the following concentrations were
measured: Time (h)
Drug Concentration
(mg/L)
0 0
0.2 88
0.5 185
1.0 277
2.0 321
2.5 311
4.0 246
6.0 161
8.0 102
21
Determination of the Model
Parameters
Cmax (Conc at t = tmax)
KaFD
C max
Vd(Ka K )
e Kt max e Kat max
At Cmax, sometimes called peak concentration, the
rate of drug absorbed is equal to the rate of drug
eliminated. Therefore, the net rate of concentration
change is equal to zero
Determination of the Model Parameters
AUC FD
AUC
KVd
Volume of Distribution
FD
Vd
K . AUC
Clearance FD
Cl
AUC
Example 2
The presented table gives the Time Conc
plasma drug concentrations that (hr) (mg/L)
were obtained following the oral 0.25 3.77
administration of 500 mg dose of 0.5 6.53
drug X. Assuming that drug X 0.75 8.49
follows normal pharmacokinetics, 1.5 11.32
determine the following: 2 11.7
Elimination rate constant 3 10.92
Absorption rate constant 10 2.96
Volume of distribution (normalized for 24 0.18
bioavailability)
30 0.05
Example 2
Determine elimination phase
1.5
1
Elimination phase
log (Conc) mg/L
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.5
-1
-1.5
time (hr)
Example 2:
Determine K
1.5
Terminal line equation:
y = -0.0883x + 1.359
1 2
R = 0.9998
K =-slope*2.303 =0.0883*2.303
log (Conc) mg/L
0.5
K= 0.2 hr-1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.5
-1
-1.5
time (hr)
Example 2:
Extrapolate the terminal line to cross the y-axis
1.5
y = -0.0883x + 1.359
1 2
R = 0.9998
log (Conc) mg/L
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.5
-1
-1.5
time (hr)
Example 2:
Draw the residual line
1.5
1
log (Conc) mg/L
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.5
-1
-1.5
time (hr)
Example 2:
Determine Ka
1.5
1
log (Conc) mg/L
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
-0.5
Residual line equation:
y = -0.3814x + 1.3372
-1 2
R = 0.9988
Ka =-slope*2.303 =0.03814*2.303
-1.5
Ka= 0.878 hr-1
time (hr)
Example 2
Volume of distribution (normalized for
bioavailability):
From the terminal line best fit line,
intercept = 1.359.
Ka F D
Intercept
10
Vd ( Ka K )
Vd Ka D 0.878 * 500
Intercept 1.359 28.3 L
F 10 ( Ka K ) 10 (0.878 0.2)
Effect of Ka on tmax, Cmax, and
AUC
Changing Ka ( K unchanged)
Increasing the
absorption rate
constant (Ka) results
in:
Shorter tmax
Higher Cmax
Unchanged AUC
Effect of K on tmax, Cmax, and
AUC
Changing K ( Ka unchanged)
Increasing the
elimination rate
constant (K) results
in:
Shorter tmax
Lower Cmax
Lower AUC
32
Effect F on tmax, Cmax, and AUC
300
F=1
Increasing the bioavailability
250 results in:
Unchanged tmax
Concentration
200
Higher Cmax
150
F = 0.5 Higher AUC
100
50 F = 0.25
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
time
Example
A 500-mg dose of the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole
is administered as an oral tablet to a human subject.
Eighty percent of the drug is absorbed, and the
balance is excreted unchanged in feces. The drug
distributes into an apparently homogeneous body
volume of 12 L, and has an absorption half-life of 15
hr and overall elimination half-life of 12 h.
1) Calculate the following:
(i) AUC0→∞,(ii) tmax and (iii) C max.
2) Recalculate the values in Problem 1 if all parameter
values remained unchanged, but the elimination half-
life was increased to 18 h.
Example
Estimate k and ka:
e lim in 1
k 0.693 t 1/ 2 0.693 12 0.058 hr
k a 0.693 t1abs
/2 0 .693 15 0.046 hr 1
Estimate AUC:
FD 0.8 500
AUC 575 mg hr/L
KVd 0.058*12
Example
Estimate tmax:
tmax = Ln Ka – LnK / Ka – K
= ((-3.07911- (-2.84731))/ (0.046-0.058)=19.32 hr
2 . 303 Ka
t max log
(Ka K) K
2 . 303 0 . 046
log 19 . 32 hr
( 0 . 046 0 . 058 ) 0 . 058
Example
Estimate Cmax:
KaFXo
C max
Vd ( Ka K )
e Kt max e Kat max
C max
12(0.046 0.058)
e
0.046 0.8 * 500 0.058*19.32 0.046*19.32
e
C max 10.9 mg/L
Example
Recalculate the values in Problem 1 if all parameter values remained
unchanged, but the elimination half-life was increased to 18 h
k 0.039 hr 1
t max 23 . 5 hr
Summary
Ka > K: Normal Kinetics (the slope
of the terminal phase represent K)
K > Ka: Flip-Flop Kinetics (the slope
of the terminal phase represent Ka)
Distinguishing between Normal and
Flip-Flop kinetics
3
Introduction
Given that the therapeutic effect is a function
of the drug concentration in a patient's blood,
these two properties of non-intravenous
dosage forms are, in principle, important in
identifying the response to a drug dose:
1. Onset of response is linked to the rate of drug
absorption whereas the time-dependent
2. Extent of response is linked to the extent of
drug absorption & elimination.
4
Bioavailability
‘‘The relative amount (the extent) of an
administered dose that reaches the
general circulation and the rate at which
this occurs’’ (American Pharmaceutical
Association, 1972)
The rate and the extent of drug that
reach systemic circulation
5
Bioavailability studies importance:
Bioavailability studies provide an estimate of the fraction
of the orally administered dose that is absorbed into the
systemic circulation when compared to the bioavailability
for an intravenous dosage form that is completely
available
6
Bioavailability studies importance:
Bioavailability studies designed to study the food
effect on drug absorption
7
Factors affecting the bioavailability
Bioavailability following oral doses may vary
because of either patient-related or drug &
dosage-form-related factors
Patient factors can include age, disease, genetic,
the nature and timing of meals, and
gastrointestinal physiology
The drug & dosage form factors include 1) the
chemical form of the drug (e.g. salt vs. acid), 2) its
physical properties (e.g. crystal structure, particle
size), and 3) an array of formulation (e.g. non-
active ingredients) and manufacturing (e.g. tablet
hardness) variables
8
Factors affecting bioavailability
1. Gastric emptying: Although not true in all cases,
increased gastric emptying generally enhances
bioavailability of orally administered drugs.
Gastric emptying depends on the following
factors:
Volume of liquid & food intake
pH of the stomach
Intake of other drugs
Age and weight of the patients
Physical activity of the patients taking drug
Various disease states
9
Factors affecting bioavailability
2. Presystemic and systemic metabolism —
Presystemic metabolism, which occurs during
first-pass metabolism, can decrease the
bioavailability of a drug. The following types of
metabolism are commonly seen:
First-pass metabolism: First-pass metabolism occurs when an
absorbed drug passes directly through the liver before reaching
systemic circulation after oral administration.
Intestinal metabolism: Drug metabolizes in the intestine itself or
during the passage through the intestinal wall.
Hydrolysis of the drug in the stomach fluids.
Transporters such as p-glycoprotein may influence the
bioavailability of a drug.
10
Factors affecting bioavailability
3. Complexation with other agents in the
gastrointestinal tract
4. Formulation factors, such as inert ingredients, the
manufacturing process and/or use of surfactants,
& dosage form (the bioavailability of the IV >IM >
S.C and in case of oral dosage form the
bioavailability of the solution > suspension >soft
capsule > hard capsule > tablet).
5. Drug related factors: Chemical and physical
properties; Lipophilicity & hydrophilicity.
11
Bioavailability assessment methods
1. Direct measure of bioavailability:
Based on Plasma Drug Concentrations
12
To assess the bioavailability
14
Absolute bioavailability
The systemic availability of the drug after
extravascular administration of the drug and is
measured by comparing the area under the drug
concentration–time curve after extravascular
administration to that after IV administration.
15
IV bolus
100
80
Concentration
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 16
Oral dosage form (product A)
100
80
Area under concentration
Concentration
60 curve (AUC)
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 17
Absolute bioavailability
For the same dose
100 (IV vs. Oral), the
bioavailability is given
80
by: AUC oral
F
Concentration
60 AUC IV
AUCoral DoseIV
40 F
AUC IV Doseoral
20
zero to 1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 18
Example
If the AUC for an oral dose of a drug
administered by tablet is 4.5 mg/ml/hr, and
the intravenous dose is 11.2 mg/ml/hr,
calculate the bioavailability of the oral
dose of the drug?
F = 4.5 / 11.2 = 0.4 or 40%
19
Relative bioavailability
The systemic availability of a drug from
one drug product (A) compared to another
drug product (B).
It can be more or less than 1.
20
Oral dosage form (product A)
100
80
Area under concentration
Concentration
60 curve (AUC)
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 21
Oral dosage form (product B)
100
80
Concentration
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 22
Relative bioavailability
100 For the same dose
(IV vs. Oral), the
80
bioavailability is given
Concentration
by:
60
AUCoral ( A)
40 F
AUCoral ( B )
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time 23
Practice Problem
The bioavailability of a new investigational drug
was studied in 12 volunteers. Each volunteer
received either a single oral tablet containing
200 mg of the drug, 5 mL of a pure aqueous
solution containing 200 mg of the drug, or a
single IV bolus injection containing 200 mg of
the drug. The average AUC values are given in
the table below. From these data, calculate
the relative bioavailability of the drug from the tablet
compared to the oral solution
the absolute bioavailability of the drug from the tablet.
24
Practice Problem
Drug Product Dose (mg) AUC (ug. hr/mL)
Oral tablet 200 50
Oral solution 200 75
IV bolus injection 200 150
25
Area Under the Conc. Time Curve
(AUC) calculation
Two methods:
Model dependent: can be used only for one
compartment IV bolus
Model independent: Can be used for any drug
with any route of administration
26
AUC calculation: Model dependent
27
AUC calculation: Model
independent
28
)ﺷﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺣﺭﻑ( Trapezoidal rule
ﻣﺳﺎﺣﺔ ﺷﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻣﻧﺣﺭﻑ=)ﻣﺟﻣﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺩﺗﻳﻥ×(2/ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ
29
AUC calculation: Model
independent
Area under tail (area between the last
observed concentration and infinity)
use the following equation:
C* C*
area
K
30
Trapezoidal rule
AUC = Sum of all trapezoids + area
under tail
31
Trapezoidal method
32
Example
IV Bolus (250 mg) Oral Suspension Oral Capsule
Time (500 mg) (500 mg)
Conc. (mg/ml) Conc. (mg/ml) Conc. (mg/ml)
1 6.3 5.0 3.1
2 5.0 7.0 4.7
3 4.0 7.4 5.2
4 3.2 7.0 5.3
6 2.0 5.4 4.5
8 1.3 3.7 3.4
12 0.5 1.6 1.7
34
Calculation of the AUC after administration of 500
mg oral suspension by the trapezoidal rule:
Area of trapezoid 1= ½*(0+5) (1-0)=2.5 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 2= ½*(5+7) (2-1)=6 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 3= ½*(7+7.4) (3-2)= 7.2 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 4= ½*(7.4+7) (4-3)= 7.2mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 5= ½*(7+5.4) (6-4)= 12.4mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 6= ½*(5.4+3.7) (8-6)= 9.1 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 7= ½*(3.7+1.6) (12-8)= 10.6 mg.h/L
Area of tail= Clast/k = 1.6/0.231=6.93 mg.h/L
Total AUC =2.5 + 6.0 + 7.2 + 7.2 + 12.4 + 9.1 + 10.6 +
6.93 = 61.93 mg. h/L
35
Calculation of the AUC after administration of 500
mg oral capsule by the trapezoidal rule:
Area of trapezoid 1= ½*(0+3.1) (1-0)=1.55 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 2= ½*(3.1+4.7) (2-1)=3.9 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 3= ½*(4.7+5.2) (3-2)= 4.95 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 4= ½*(5.2+5.3) (4-3)= 5.25 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 5= ½*(5.3+4.5) (6-4)= 9.8 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 6= ½*(4.5+3.4) (8-6)= 7.9 mg.h/L
Area of trapezoid 7= ½*(3.4+1.7) (12-8)= 10.2 mg.h/L
Area of tail= Clast/k = 1.7/0.231=7.36 mg.h/L
Total AUC =1.55 + 3.9 + 4.95 + 5.25 + 9.8 + 7.9 + 10.2
+7.36 = 50.9 mg. h/L
36
Answer
The absolute BA of the suspension (note that the doses
for the IV and the oral suspension are different):
61.93 250
F susp = × = .
34.63 500
The absolute BA of the capsule (Note that the doses for
the IV and the oral capsule are different):
.
F cap = × = .
.
b. The BA of the capsule relative to the suspension (the
dose is similar):
50.9 500
F relative = × = . %
61.93 500
&'() .,
F relative = = = . %
&*+*) .-
37
Bioequivalence
38
Bioequivalence
Pharmaceutical alternatives: Drug products that
contain the same therapeutic moiety but differ in dosage
form, strength, salt or ester of the active therapeutic
moiety.
39
Bioequivalent products: Pharmaceutical equivalent
products with no significant difference in the rate and
extent to which the active ingredient becomes available at
the site of action when administered under similar
conditions in an appropriately designed study.
Therapeutic equivalents: Drug products for the same
active ingredient that can be substituted with the full
expectation that the substituted product will produce the
same clinical effect and safety profile as the prescribed
product. Drug products are considered to be
therapeutically equivalent if they are pharmaceutical
equivalents and bioequivalents.
Clinical Equivalence: The drug products provide identical
in vivo pharmacological response as measured by control
of the disease or symptoms.
40
Criteria for waiver of the BA or BE
41
Criteria for waiver of the BA or BE
42
Criteria for waiver of the BA or BE
43
Pharmacokinetic approach to demonstrate
product bioequivalence:
Study Design
Repeated measures, cross-over and carry-over
designs:
The administration of two or more treatments one after
the other in a specified or random order to the same
group of patients is called a crossover design or
change-over design
Advantages
They provide good precision for comparing treatments
because all sources of variability between subjects are
excluded from the experimental error. It is economic on
subjects. This is particularly important when only a few
subjects can be utilized for the experiments.
44
Washout period
The time interval between the 2 treatments is
called as WASHOUT PERIOD.
45
2. Subjects:
Selection of subjects:
Aim to minimize variability and permit detection of differences
between pharmaceutical products.
The studies should normally be performed with healthy volunteers
24 volunteers (12 in each group).
They should be screened for suitability by means of clinical
laboratory tests, review of medical history, and medical examination.
Standardization of the study:
Standardization of the diet, fluid intake and exercise is
recommended.
The subjects should not take other medicines during a suitable
period before and during the study.
Genetic pheno-typing:
46
Characteristics to be investigated
In most cases evaluation of bioavailability and
bioequivalence will be based upon the measured
concentrations of the parent compound.
In some situations, measurements of an active or
inactive metabolite are carried out.
The plasma concentration versus time curves is mostly
used to assess extent and rate of absorption.
The use of urine excretion data may be advantageous in
determining the extent of drug input in case of products
predominately excreted renally.
Specificity, accuracy and reproducibility of the methods
should be sufficient.
47
Chemical analysis
Reference and test product
Data analysis
Statistical analysis
Acceptance range for pharmacokinetic parameters:
1.AUC-ratio:
It should lie within an acceptance interval of 0.80-1.25.
2.Cmax-ratio:
It should lie within an acceptance interval of 0.80-1.25.
The wider interval must be 0.75-1.33.
For tmax if there is a clinically relevant claim for rapid
release or action or signs related to adverse effects.
48
Two-compartment
Pharmacokinetic
Model
Dr. Mahmoud Samy
Lecturer of Clinical Pharmacy
Outlines
Pharmacokinetic Model
This model assumes that the drug can enter or leave the
body (ie, the model is "open"), and the body acts like a
single, uniform compartment.
6
One compartment open model
The simplest kinetic model that describes drug
disposition in the body is to consider that the
drug is injected all at once into a box, or
compartment, and that the drug distributes
instantaneously and homogenously throughout
the compartment.
7
One compartment model
8
absorption Central elimination
compartment
Oral dose
elimination
Central
compartment
IV dose
One compartment:
10
One compartment:
11
Two-compartment model
While if the drug is distributed rapidly to some tissues
and organs and slowly to other tissues and organs, the
two-compartment pharmacokinetic model can be used to
describe the pharmacokinetic behavior of the drug in this
case.
In a two-compartment model, drug can move between the
central ( plasma compartment and highly perfused organ)
to and from the tissue compartment (peripheral
compartment).
In this model, in most cases, there is no elimination from
tissue compartment and the drug need to be transported
again to the plasma in order to be eliminated
absorption
Peripheral
Central compartment
compartment
Oral dose
elimination
Central Peripheral
IV dose compartment compartment
elimination
Typical plasma concentration (Cp) versus time profiles for a
drug that obeys a two-compartment model following
intravenous bolus administration
k21
Central Peripheral
IV dose compartment compartment
(X1) (X2)
k12
k10
elimination
Assumptions of the model
Upon drug absorption there is instantaneous
distribution of drug throughout the central
compartment (sampling compartment) having a
volume V1 (Vc)
Transfer of drug from the central compartment to
the peripheral compartment is by a first-order
process
Transfer of drug from of drug from the peripheral
compartment to the central compartment is by a
first-order process
Drug concentrations in the two compartments
following a single i.v. bolus injection
A. At zero time, there is no
drug in the peripheral
compartment
B. The amount of the drug in
the central compartment
decreases rapidly due to
drug distribution and
elimination
C. Some drug in peripheral
compartment come back to
the central compartment
but the net transfer from
central to the peripheral till
equilibrium (maximum
conc. In the peripheral
compartment)
Drug concentrations in the two compartments
following a single i.v. bolus injection
D. Elimination occur
from central
compartment, so
amount of drug in it
decrease slowly
leads to increase the
rate of transfer from
the peripheral to the
central compartment,
so the net drug
transfer from the
peripheral to the
central compartment.
Parameters of the two-compartment
pharmacokinetic model
Vc is the volume of the central compartment and has units of volume.
This term relates the administered dose to the initial plasma drug
concentration (central compartment concentration) after administration of
a single IV dose: Cp0= Dose/Vc
Vdss: is the volume of distribution of the drug at steady state and has
units of volume. This term relates the amount of the drug in the body and
the plasma drug concentration at steady state: Amount of the drug in the
body at steady state = Vdss Cpss
Vdβ : is the volume of distribution during the elimination phase and has
units of volume. This term relates the amount of the drug in the body
and the plasma drug concentration during the elimination phase (β-
phase): Amount of the drug in the body during the elimination phase =
Vdβ Cpβ-phase.
K12
X1 X2
Central K21 peripheral
K10
dX 1
K 21 X 2 K12 X 1 K10 X 1
dt
dX 2
K12 X 1 K 21 X 2
dt
Distribution rate from X1 to X2 = K12 X 1
Distribution rate from X2 to X1 = K 21 X 2
Elimination rate = K10 X 1
X 0 ( K 21 ) t X 0 ( K 21 ) t Amount in the
X1 e e central compartment
X 0 ( K 21 ) t X 0 ( K 21 ) t Conc in the central
C1 e e compartment
VC ( ) VC ( )
VC is the volume of the central compartment
Xo ( K 21) Xo ( K 21 )
A B
Vc ( ) Vc ( )
Postdistribution
phase to
determine:
1. Determine β from
the graph by using
the slope
2. The y-axis
intercept of the
extrapolated line is
B
Determination of the distribution rate constant
(α) and the coefficient (A)
Determination of the distribution rate constant (α) and
the coefficient (A)
Method of residuals: The
difference between
measured concentrations
and those obtained by
extrapolation of the post-
distribution line is plotted
vs time
1. Determine α from the
graph by using the slope
2. The y-axis intercept of
the extrapolated line is A
Volume of distribution of the central
compartment (VC)
Volume of distribution of the central
compartment (VC). This is a proportionality
constant that relates the amount of drug
and the plasma concentration immediately
(i.e. at t=0) following the administration of
a drug. (Cp0= Dose/Vc) -------(Cp0 = A+B)
Vc=
Determination of micro rate constants: the inter-
compartmental rate constants (K21 and K12) and
the pure elimination rate constant (K10)
αβ
K1 = K 10
K 21
K21= Aβ Bα
K 21
(A B)
K12 = + −( + )
Volume of distribution during the
terminal phase (Vb or Vβ)
This is a proportionality constant that
relates the plasma concentration and the
amount of drug remaining in the body at a
time following the attainment of distribution
equilibrium, or at a time on the terminal
linear portion of the plasma concentration
time data. .
V = =
Volume of distribution at steady
state (Vss)
This is a proportionality constant that relates the
plasma concentration and the amount of drug
remaining in the body at a time, following the
attainment of practical steady state. This volume
of distribution is independent of elimination
parameters such as K10 or drug clearance.
Xss ( K 21 K 12 )
Vss Vc
Css K 21
Vss= ( + )
The area under the plasma
concentration-time curve (AUC)
Model independent: Trapezoid method
Model dependent:
AUC= +
Total Body Clearance, CLT
AUC= +
AUC = 4.62/8.94 + 0.64/0.19 = 3.8 mg.h/L
Answer
TBC = Dose/ AUC
CLT= 75/ 3.8 = 19.3 L/h
Vc=
Vc= 75/ (4.62+.64) =14.26 L
k10= TBC/Vc = 19.3/14.2 = 1.353 h-1
Vss= ( + )
Vdss = 6.7 (1+0.77/0.310) =88.3 L
What will be the amount of drug remaining in
the body after 15 hours?
Cp = Ae−αt + Be−βt
Cp(mg/L)= 120 e-1.38* 15 + 25 e-0.087*15= 6.87 mg/L
Amount of the drug in the body during the
elimination phase = Cp × Vdβ
Amount15 h = Cp15 h × Vdβ = 6.78 mg/L
× 30.7 L = 208 mg
Problem 1
After the administration of a single IV bolus dose of
100 mg lidocaine, the plasma conc-time profile can
be described from the following equation :
Cp(mg/l)= 2.6 e-5t + 0.52 e-0.4t
K10
Oral dose
elimination
dX 1
K a X a K 21 X 2 K12 X 1 K10 X 1
dt
dX 2
K12 X 1 K 21 X 2
dt
Two Compartment Extravascular
Two Compartment Extravascular
If the drug is rapidly absorbed, the decline in the plasma
concentration–time profile after the end of the absorption
phase will be biexponential, reflecting the distribution
and the elimination phases.
Deep peripheral
X3
k31 k13
k21
Central Shallow
IV dose compartment Peripheral
(X1) compartment
k12 (X2)
k10
elimination
t t t
Triexponential Equation: C1 Ae Be Ce
Metabolites and
urinary excretion
kinetics
Dr. Mahmoud Samy
Lecturer of Clinical Pharmacy
Outlines
Metabolite pharmacokinetics
Renal excretion PK of drugs
Methods to compute PK parameters
from urinary data
Determination of the Drug
Bioavailability from the Cumulative
Amount Excreted in Urine
Drug Metabolism
Drug metabolism, also referred to as drug
biotransformation or drug detoxification, usually
involves enzymatic modification of the chemical
structure of a drug to form one or more
metabolites
Dose X
Therefore,
/
= . =
Determination of the renal clearance
Cp tmid is the drug plasma concentration
at the midpoint of the urine collection
interval.
rate (μg/h)
excretion
Renal
Determination of the renal excretion rate
Slope of the drug renal excretion rate versus
time plot on the semilog scale is equal to
−k/2.303 and the y-intercept is equal to ke Dose.
2–4 81 0.70
Time
Volume Concentration
interval
(mL) (mg/L)
(h)
0–1 0.6 43.3
1–2 0.45 46.4
2–4 1.34 23.6
4–6 1.42 14.4
8–10 1.28 7.34
12–14 1.30 3.38
The rate method:
1- Calculate amount of drug eliminated
Amount = volume*conc
Collection Urine
Urine Volume Cpt-mid
Interval (h) Concentration
(mL) (ug/mL) (ug/mL)
0–1 67 2.1 Not determined
1–2 70 1.01 Not determined
2–4 100 0.50 0.5 ug/ml at time 3
4–8 250 0.05 Not determined
Calculate the average renal execretion rate of the drug during the first urine collection
interval (0-1 hr).
Calculate the average renal execration rate of the drug during the third urine collection
interval (2-4 hr).
Calculate the renal clearance of this drug in this patient.
The half life of this drug is 1 hr. what is the elimination rate constant of this drug?
The slope of renal excretion rate vs time plot on a semilog graph paper?
The rate method (Example)
Time
Volume Concentration
interval
(mL) (ug/mL)
(h)
0–1 67 2.1
1–2 70 1.01
2–4 100 0.50
4–8 250 0.05
The rate method:
1- Calculate amount of drug eliminated
Amount = volume*conc
= = . .
Cl R= Ke.Vd = 3; < 3 /
=25/0.5 = 50 mL/hr
Answer
The half life of this drug is 1 hr. what is the
elimination rate constant of this drug?
T1/2= 1hr k= 0.693/1= 0.693 hr -1
3
Linear Pk
4
Linear Pk
In this situation, steady-state serum
concentrations increase or decrease
proportionally with dose.
5
Nonlinear Pk
For drugs that exhibit nonlinear or dose
dependent kinetics or concentration dependent,
the fundamental pharmacokinetic parameters such
as clearance, the apparent volume of distribution,
and the elimination half life may vary depending on
the administered dose.
7
Nonlinear Pk
Administration of
different doses of
drugs with nonlinear
kinetics may not
result in parallel
plasma
concentration
versus time profiles
expected for drugs
with linear
pharmacokinetics
8
9
Nonlinear Pk Causes
This is because one or more of the kinetic processes
(absorption, distribution and/or elimination) of the drug may
be occurring via a mechanism other than simple first-order
kinetics.
Saturable absorption: For example, the extent of
absorption of amoxicillin decreases with an increase in
dose
Saturable binding: plasma protein binding of
disopyramide is saturable at the therapeutic concentration,
the fraction of disopyramide bound varies between 35% at
high doses & 95% at low doses. This means that small
increase in doses result in disproportionally increase in the
effect
10
Nonlinear Pk Causes
Saturable Active secretion: As for nonlinearity in
renal excretion, it has been shown that the
antibacterial agent dicloxacillin has saturable
active secretion in the kidneys, resulting in a
decrease in renal clearance as dose is increased
Linear PK Nonlinear PK
( first order kinetic) (zero order kinetic)
1-Known as dose-independent or 1-Known as dose-dependent or
concentration-independent PK. concentration-dependent PK.
2-The absorption, distribution and 2-At least one of the PK processes
elimination of the drug follow first-order (absorption, distribution or elimination)
kinetics is saturable (zero order kinetic).
3-The pharmacokinetic parameters such 3-The pharmacokinetic parameters
as the half-life, total body clearance and such as the half-life, volume of
volume of distribution are constant and distribution, total body clearance are
do not depend on the drug conc conc-dependant
4-The change in drug dose results in 4-The change in drug dose results in
proportional change in the drug more than proportional or less than
concentration. proportional change in the drug conc.
14
Difference between linear & nonlinear PK:
16
Michaelis–Menten kinetics
Michaelis-Menten kinetics model that describe
saturable enzyme system
Used to predict Cp resulting from administration of
drug with saturable metabolism where a drug at low
concentration is cleared by first-order kinetics and at
high concentrations by zero order kinetics
Conditions that alter M-M parameters
Enzyme Induction or inhibition (Vm)
Hepatic disease
17
Michaelis- Menten kinetics
18
Michaelis- Menten kinetics
19
Michaelis- Menten kinetics
The rate of metabolism, or the rate of elimination if metabolism is
the only pathway of elimination, is defined by the Michaelis–
Menten equation:
∗
R( )=
where R is the rate of drug administration or the metabolic rate;
( )= =DD.S
Vm is the maximum metabolic rate (unit: amount/time)
Km :Substrate concentration at 50% Vm ( mg / L ), the Michaelis–
Menten constant (unit: same as the concentration [amount/volume]),
and Css plasma conc at steady state .
. !
t1/2= ( + ) TBC =
20
Phenytoin & its key pharmacokinetic
parameters
Phenytoin is antiepileptic drug that follow
EXCLUSIVE non-linear kinetic
Therapeutic concentration 20- 10mg / L
F ( bioavailability ) 1.0
S ( salt form ) 0.92
Vd 0.7 L/ kg
Cl ( clearance ), t1/2 Dose dependant
Vm 7mg / kg / day
Km 4mg /L (average) Constant
PPB %95-90
Plasma concentration below 5 mg/L not effective 21
Phenytoin
Phenytoin side effect is Other long term side effect
concentration dependent
22
Phenytoin dosage forms
Phenytoin Na
Phenytoin acid
(s=.92)
Chewable tablet Capsules
Suspension Parenteral solution
N.B:
Change between different brands should consider
the difference in bioavailability.
Poor solubility, so it is formulated in microcrystal
form
23
Rationale for TDM
Saturable elimination at therapeutic range
Lack of predictability
Narrow therapeutic index
Significant drug interaction
Large intersubject variability
25
Patient 1st visit : no
individualized data available
26
Patient 1st visit : no
individualized data available
Use population date Km= 4 mg/L, Vm=7
mg/kg/day & Vd = 0.7 L/Kg/day
Mathematically: M-M Equation
#$ (#∗%)*+,)% -**
R ( ) =
%&' .# %)*+,)% -**
<=
/012 34 05678791:01738(/;) = ?=DD.S
>
29
Patient 2nd visit : one dose &
one level available
30
Patient 2nd visit : one dose &
one level available
Use the given dosing rate & the measured
serum level to calculate Vm Michaelis
Menten equation assume Km = 4
mg / L
#$ (#∗%)*+,)% -**
R ( )= DD.S =
%&' .# %)*+,)% -**
31
Example 1
S.B. is a 70 kg , 37 Y.O. male with seizure disorde
r that only partially been controlled with 300mg /
day capsules of phenytoin. His plasma phenytoin
conc. has been measured twice over the past
year & both times it was 8 mg / l. Calculate a daily
dose which will achieve a steady state
concentration of 15 mg / l.
32
Answer
R = 300 mg / day , Cpss = 8 mg/L , S = 0.92 F = 1
#$ (#∗%)*+,)% -**
R ( )= DD.S =
%&' .# %)*+,)% -**
(#∗@
300 ∗ 0.92 =
A @
Vm = ( 12 * 300 * 0.92 )/ 8 = 414 mg / day
AEA ∗EF
DD ∗ 0.92 = =355 mg/day
A EF
33
Example 2
B.U. is a 9 Y.O. 30 kg male who has been admitted to
the emergency dep. for treatment of uncontrolled
seizure activity. His friend relates that he has been
taking 180 mg chewable tablet of phenytoin QD for 6
weeks, serum levels of phenytoin was found to be 3 mg
/ l . Assume that this is a steady state level. Calculate
Vmax for this patient.
In the above case, what is the new dose of phenytoin
required to yield a steady state plasma concentration of
15 mg / l ?
34
Answer
R =180 mg / day , Cpss = 3 mg/L S =
1.0 F = 1.0
#$ (#∗%)*+,)% -**
R ( )= DD.S =
%&' .# %)*+,)% -**
(#∗G
180 ∗ 1 =
A G
Vm = ( 7 * 180 * 1 ) / 3 = 420 mg / day
AHI∗EF
DD∗ 1 = = 332 mg / day
A EF
35
Orbit graph
1. On the left side of the x-axis, a steady-state total
phenytoin concentration is plotted.
2. On the y-axis, the phenytoin dosage rate (in mg/kg/d) is
plotted.
3. A straight line is drawn between these two points,
extended into the right sector, and through the orbs
contained in the right sector.
4. If the line intersects more than one orb, the innermost
orb is selected, and the midpoint of the line contained
within that orb is found and marked with a point.
5. The midpoint within the orb and the desired steady-state
phenytoin total concentration (on the left portion of the x-
axis) are connected by a straight line.
Orbit graph
6. The intersection of this line with the y-axis is the new
phenytoin dose required to achieve the new phenytoin
concentration.
7. If a line parallel to the y-axis is drawn down to the x-axis
from the midpoint of the line contained within the orb, an
estimate of Km (in μg/mL) is obtained.
8. Similarly, if a line parallel to the x-axis is drawn to the left
to the y-axis from the midpoint of the line contained
within the orb, an estimate of Vmax (in mg/kg/d) is
obtained.
Example
TD is a 50-year-old, 75-kg (5 ft 10 in) male with
simple partial seizures who requires therapy with
oral phenytoin. He has normal liver and renal
function. The patient was prescribed 400 mg/d of
extended phenytoin sodium capsules for 1
month, and the steady-state phenytoin total
concentration equals 6.2 μg/mL. The patient is
assessed to be compliant with his dosage
regimen. Suggest an initial phenytoin dosage
regimen designed to achieve a steady-state
phenytoin concentration within the therapeutic
range.
phenytoin dose =
0.92 ⋅ phenytoin sodium dose =
0.92 ⋅ 400 mg/d = 368 mg/d;
368 mg/d / 75 kg = 4.9 mg/kg/d
Patient 3rd visit : two doses &
two levels available
40
Patient 3rd visit : two doses &
two levels available
Use the two dosing rate & the two
measured serum levels to calculate the new
Vm & Km by Michaelis-Menten equation
#$ (#∗-**
R ( )= DD.S =
%&' .# -**
41
Example 3
RM is a 32 year old, 80kg male who is being seen in the
Neurology Clinic. Prior to his last visit he had been taking
300mg of Phenytoin daily; however, because his
seizures were poorly controlled and because his plasma
concentration was only 8mg/L, his dose was increased
to 350mg daily. Now he complains of minor CNS side
effects and his reported plasma Phenytoin concentration
is 20mg/L. Renal and hepatic function are normal.
Assume that both of the reported plasma concentrations
represent steady state and that the patient has compiled
with the prescribed dosing regimens. Calculate RM’s
apparent Vm and Km and a new daily dose of Phenytoin
that will result in a steady state level of about 15mg/L.
42
Answer
R1* Km R1* CSS (1) Vm * CSS (1)
R 2 * Km R 2 * CSS (2) Vm * CSS (2)
R1 300 mg / day, CSS (1) 8 mg / L
R 2 350 mg / day, CSS (2) 20 mg / L
300 * Km 300 * 8 Vm * 8 37.5 * Km 300 Vm (1)
350 * Km 350 * 20 Vm * 20 17.5 * Km 350 Vm (2)
Eqn (1)- Eqn(2):
20 * Km 50 0 50
Km 2.5 mg / L
20
Eqn (1):
44
Direct Linear Plot
Direct linear plot is a linear transformation method that is
used to estimate Vmax and Km.
This method requires knowledge of two different dosing
rates and their corresponding steady-state plasma drug
concentrations.
The plot is constructed by plotting the dosing rate in the
y-axis and the steady-state drug concentration on the left
side of the x-axis. A line is drawn between each dosing
rate and its corresponding steady-state concentration.
The two lines for the two dosing rates are extrapolated
until they intersect.
The x-coordinate of the point of intersection corresponds
to Km, while the y-coordinate of the point of intersection
corresponds to Vmax/F as presented in following Figure.
45
Direct Linear Plot
46
Example 3
A 32-year-old, 75 kg female has been taking 200 mg of phenytoin daily.
Because her average phenytoin plasma concentration was only 6 mg/L, her
phenytoin dose was increased to 350 mg/day. The steady-state average
phenytoin concentration was 21 mg/L (Vd of phenytoin is 0.75 L/kg and F =
1).
a. Using the direct linear plot, calculate the phenytoin Vmax and Km in this
patient.
b. Calculate the dose required to achieve an average steady-state
phenytoin plasma concentration around 15 mg/L.
c. Calculate phenytoin half-life & TBC at steady state while the patient was
taking 350 mg/day.
d. Because of poor seizure control, phenobarbitone (enzyme inducer) was
added to the patient’s medications. After several weeks, phenytoin plasma
concentration was 14 mg/L while taking 360 mg/day phenytoin. Comment
on the decrease in phenytoin plasma concentration.
47
Answer
48
Answer
From the direct linear plot Vmax = 500 mg/day; Km
9 mg/L
The dose required to achieve a steady-state
concentration of 15 mg/L can be determined
graphically and mathematically.
Graphically from Figure, the dose is
approximately 315 mg/day (Approximately 350
mg). Mathematically,
(#∗-** FII∗EF
Dosing rate= = =312.5 mg/day
.# -** K EF
49
C- Steady state when the dose was 350
mg/day = 21 mg/L.
. !
t1/2= ( + )
. ! ( .L M ∗LN )
t1/2= ( + OP) = 2.18 days
N
N
TBC = = =16.67 L/Day
OP
51
Answer
54
Linear Transformation method
This method is based on a linear transformation of M-M
Equation that relates the dosing rate and the achieved
steady-state drug concentration and includes the
Michaelis-Menten parameters, Vmax and Km:
#$ <= (#∗-**
R ( ) = =
%&' > .# -**
<= <=
S6 + T99 = U6 ∗ T99
> >
Rearrangement and dividing by F Css
X
= Y (#
= −W6 +
> -** <
55
Linear Transformation method:
This is a straight-line equation.
A plot of the dosing rate (D/τ) versus the dosing rate
divided by the average steady-state concentration yields
a straight line with a slope equal to −Km and y-intercept
equal to Vmax/F.
The parameters Vmax and Km estimated from the slope
and the y-intercept of the plot can be used to calculate
the dosing rate required to achieve a certain Cpss or,
conversely, to calculate the expected Cpss from
administration of a given dosing rate.
56
Linear Transformation method:
57
Practical problem 2
A 25 kg, 14-year-old female was admitted to the hospital because of
frequent episodes of seizures. She was diagnosed as having epileptic
seizures and she was started on IV phenytoin. She received a loading dose
of 5 mg/kg followed by 80 mg phenytoin IV given every 12 h. At steady
state, the average plasma phenytoin concentration was found to be 8 mg/L.
The phenytoin dose was increased to 100 mg phenytoin IV given every 12
h. At steady state, the plasma phenytoin concentration was 13.3 mg/L.
Because the patient’s condition was stable, the IV phenytoin was replaced
with phenytoin oral suspension, which is known to have 100%
bioavailability. The patient went home with a prescription for 225 mg
phenytoin suspension at bed time every day. (The volume of distribution of
phenytoin is 0.8 L/kg.)
a. Graphically estimate phenytoin Vmax and Km in this patient.
b. What is the expected average steady-state phenytoin concentration in
this patient while taking the 225 mg phenytoin suspension at night?
c. Calculate phenytoin CLT and half-life in this patient while taking the
phenytoin suspension (225 mg phenytoin at bed time) at steady state.
58
Answer
a. Vmax = 340 mg/day Km = 8.8 mg/L
b. Cpss = 17.2 mg/L
c. Half-life = 1.1 day CLT = 13.0 L/day
59
Drug Distribution
&
Protein binding
3
Drug Distribution & Protein binding
B. Extent of Distribution
1. Lipid Solubility:
Very high lipid solubility can result in a drug partitioning into highly vascular lipid-
rich areas. Subsequently these drugs slowly redistribute into body fat where they
may remain for long periods of time.
2. Effects of pH:
The rate of movement of a drug out of circulation will depend on its degree of
ionization and therefore its pKa.
3.Plasma protein binding:
Extensive plasma protein binding will cause more drug to stay in the
central blood compartment. Therefore drugs which bind strongly to
plasma protein tend to have lower volumes of distribution. (↑ protein
binding = ↓ V)
Albumin comprises 50 % of the total proteins binds the widest range
of drugs.
Acidic drugs commonly bind to albumin, while basic drugs often
bind to α1-acid glycoproteins and lipoproteins.
4
General rules
Rule 1: Plasma proteins represent silent binding site (depot)
for drugs: the BOUND drug is inactive; the FREE,
UNBOUND drug can leave the blood and act and can be
acted upon. As long as a drug is bound to plasma protein, it
cannot act (as it cannot reach the site of action), it cannot be
eliminated (as it can not reach enzymes and transporters,
and cannot be filtered at the glomeruli).
5
The percentage of protein binding
The percentage of protein binding of a drug in plasma
can be determined experimentally as follows:
( )×
% Protein binding =
!
6
Dosing regimen
&
Disease state in special
populations
Dr. Mahmoud Samy
Lecturer of Clinical Pharmacy
Introduction
The design of a dosing regimen involves selection of the
appropriate dose and dosing interval for each individual
patient.
Few factors have to be considered before calculating the
dosing regimen:
Therapeutic Range of the Drug
Required Onset of Effect
Drug Product (availability of modified-release products
for the drug of interest)
Progression of the Patient’s Disease State
Estimation of the Patient Pharmacokinetic Parameters
8
Variables that can affect total body clearance
(TBC) within individual
Changes in eliminating organ function leads to
changes in total body clearance
TBC = Rcl + Mcl + Other organ clearance
Factors affecting metabolic clearance including:
Age, Genetics, Liver disease, Plasma protein
binding & other drug that induce or inhibit metabolic
enzymes.
Factors affecting renal clearance including: it is
related to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) which
measured by creatinine clearance.
9
Effect of age on volume of distribution (Vd):
In very young infant, hydrophilic drugs have
large Vd as infant has higher proportion of their
body weight as water (80 %)
10
Effect of age on drug metabolism & renal
function
Effect of age on drug metabolism
In neonates ( < 1 months), they have slow metabolic rate
so drugs have longer t1/2
In Children (3 – 12 y), they have normal metabolic rate
In elderly ( > 65 y), they have slow metabolic rate so
drugs have longer t1/2
11
The general approach for dose adjustment in renal
dysfunction patients has the following assumptions:
The kidney dysfunction does not affect the
concentration-effect relationship, that is, the therapeutic
range does not change due to the change in kidney
function (Linear PK).
12
General Requirements
This approach requires knowledge of:
The average drug dose in patients with normal kidney
function (Normal Dose).
14
Fraction (f)
The fraction of the IV dose excreted unchanged in urine (f) can be
determined from the ratio of the total amount of the drug excreted in
urine and the IV dose or the bioavailable oral dose:
GH
Fraction (f) =
I<JH (KL)
GH
Fraction (f) =
C I<JH (M=?@)
Also, the fraction excreted unchanged in urine can be determined
from the ratio of the renal excretion rate constant to the elimination
rate constant or the ratio of the renal clearance to the total body
clearance as follows:
BH NOP
Fraction (f) = =
B QRN
15
Kidney function (KF)
The initial dose estimation for renally eliminated drugs in
renal dysfunction patients is usually based on the patient’s
creatinine clearance.
N=NO .?K@S=H
KF =
N=NO ;<=>?@
16
Creatinine Clearance from urine collection
The creatinine clearance can be determined from the
24 h urine collection and calculation of the average
creatinine excretion rate.
CrCl (in mL/min) = (UCr ⋅ Vurine) / (SCr ⋅ T)
where:
UCr is the urine creatinine concentration in mg/dL,
Vurine is the volume of urine collected in mL,
SCr is the serum creatinine collected at the midpoint of
the urine collection in mg/dL,
T is the time in minutes of the urine collection.
Disadvantages: Tedious method, Time consuming,
Affected by diet & muscle mass, Not accurate
17
Cockroft and Gault method
The Cockoroft and Gault method can be used to
estimate the creatinine clearance in adults from 18 years
and older with stable serum creatinine.
Male:
0UV 4W9 X Y95WZ/ ([\)
Creatinine clearance (ml/min) =
]987^ _894/5`5`9 X a2
Female:
0UV 4W9 X Y95WZ/ ([\)
Creatinine clearance (ml/min) = V. cd X
]987^ _894/5`5`9 X a2
18
Problem 8.1
A patient admitted to the hospital because of acute myocardial
infarction was started on oral antiarrhythmic medication. He was
given 600 mg every 12 h from an oral formulation that is known to
be rapidly absorbed but only 80% bioavailable. At steady state,
the maximum and minimum plasma concentrations were 30 and
10.5 μg/mL, respectively
a. Calculate mathematically the half-life and the volume of
distribution of this drug in this patient.
Regimen 285/12h
CI
|}∞ ^4X =
•€(0 H{B• )
V.cX2cd
Cpmax ss = = 23.58 mg/l
2U.j(0 9{ .VU0jX 02 )
x9 |ƒ89`46 GH
Fraction (f) = = =
x „…| I<JH (KL)
GH 0cV
Fraction (f) = = = 0.6
I<JH (KL) ‚VV
†‡†ˆ‰Š‹ˆŒ‡•
KF= = 40/120= 0.3333
†‡†ˆ Ž•‡•Šˆ
f= 0.6
/ 0/2 `g8^46
T1/2failure =
[3 (xe 0) y0]
a.d
T1/2failure = = 12.5hr
[V.j(.‚‚‚ 0) y0]
K= 0.693/12.5= 0.05544 hr-1
What will be the steady-state maximum and minimum
plasma concentrations if this patient continues taking 300 mg
q12 h IV despite the change in his kidney function?
–—
Cp∞ max = {™š )
˜ (
‚VV
Cpmax ss = = 52.5 mg/l
00.aj(0 9{ .VddUUX 02 )
Cpmin ss = 52.5e-.05544x12
Cpmin ss = 26.9 mg /L
Dose Adjustment in Hepatic Dysfunction
Dose adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction is not an easy
task. This is because there is no single clinical test that can be used
for the assessment of liver function. Also, different metabolic
enzyme systems are affected to different degrees by the reduction in
liver function.
The Child-Pugh classification has been used in clinical practice
for categorizing patients according to the severity of their liver
function impairment.
This classification utilizes five different laboratory tests and clinical
conditions to assess the severity of liver disease: serum albumin,
total bilirubin, prothrombin time, ascites, and encephalopathy.
Each of these parameters is classified and is given a score of 1, 2,
or 3 depending on the value of the parameter
The total Child-Pugh score is calculated from the sum of the scores
for all the five parameters.
29
Child-Pugh’s Classification for Patients
with Liver Diseases
Parameters Score
1 2 3
Serum albumin (g/dL) >3.5 2.8–3.5 < 2.8
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) < 2.0 2.0–3.0 > 3.0
Prothrombin time <4 4–6 >6
(seconds over control)
Ascites Absent Mild Moderate
Encephalopathy None Moderate Severe
31
Answer
Lidocaine is an antiarrhythmic drug that is completely metabolized. So
the patient’s liver condition may affect the clearance of lidocaine. It is
wise to calculate the Child-Pugh score for his patient to determine if dose
reduction is necessary.
Serum albumin 3.2 g/dL Score = 2
Bilirubin 4.5 mg/dL Score = 3
Prothrombin time 8 s > control Score = 3
Ascites Mild Score = 2
Encephalopathy Absent Score = 1
Total Child-Pugh score = 11
According to the Child-Pugh score, the starting dose of lidocaine in
this patient should be 50% of the average recommended dose of
lidocaine. Lidocaine dose can be adjusted after the start of therapy
according to the therapeutic and the adverse effects of lidocaine.
32
Alteration in Drug Pharmacokinetics in Obese
Patients
Medications that have high lipid solubility tend to partition
into adipose tissue, and the volume of distribution in
obese patients for these drugs can be dramatically larger
than in normal weight patients.
33
Ideal body weight (IBW)
Ideal body weight (IBW) were preferred in moderate to
highly lipophilic drugs when used.in obese patients.
IBW (male) = 50 + 2.3 X height in inches > 60 inches
34
Example of Hydrophilic drugs
The aminoglycoside antibiotics (gentamicin) are
hydrophilic drugs that are mainly distributed in the
extracellular fluid (ECF) and usually have an average Vd
of about 0.26.L/kg.
It is recommended that in obese patients (patients
whose TBW is >130% of the IBW) the Vd for
aminoglycosides should be calculated based on
following Equation.
In this equation, the difference between TBW and IBW
that represents the adipose tissues is multiplied by a
factor of 0.4 to account for the lower extracellular fluids
in adipose tissues:
Vd (L) = 0.26 (L/kg)[IBW + 0.4 (TBW – IBW)]
35
Example of Lipophilic drugs
Also, lipophilic drugs such as phenytoin usually have
high affinity to fat and are distributed to adipose tissues
more than their distribution to lean tissues.
36