Brijesh Verma

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/320346614

Development of fly ash based new Bio-Composites Material as Wood


Substitute

Research · October 2017

CITATION READS

1 1,235

4 authors, including:

Abhishek Gaikwad Vinod Verma


Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences
23 PUBLICATIONS   76 CITATIONS    7 PUBLICATIONS   24 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Ajeet Kumar Rai


Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences
63 PUBLICATIONS   371 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Development of energy efficient solar cooker View project

Development of an efficient solar air heater View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Abhishek Gaikwad on 12 October 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


International Journal of Mechanical and Production
Engineering Research and Development (IJMPERD)
ISSN (P): 2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001
Vol. 7, Issue 3, Jun 2017, 1-6
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

DEVELOPMENT OF FLY ASH BASED NEW BIO-COMPOSITES

MATERIAL AS WOOD SUBSTITUTE

BRIJESH KUMAR PATEL1, VINOD KUMAR VERMA2, A. K. RAI3 & ABHISHEK GAIKWAD4
1
Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shepherd School of Engineering and Technology,
Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and Sciences,
Deemed University, Allahabad Uttar Pradesh, India
2,3,4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shepherd School of Engineering and Technology,
Sam higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and Sciences,
Deemed University, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh India
ABSTRACT

Fly ash is produce from the thermal power plant from the coal combustion as a problematic solid waste all over
the world. India has some of the largest reserves of coal in world. The fly ash is collected from the renusagar power plant
in Anpara U.P. India and Human Hair is collected from the local shop of shailoon. The composite plates are developed
by using CY-230 resin. Human hair must have high strength. The specimen preparation and testing was carried out as

Original Article
per ASTM standards and mechanical properties like tensile, compressive and flexural stress of bio composite were
evaluated. The experiments are carried out with the aid of Design Experts (Design of Experiment) software. The
developed composites specimens are tested for tensile, flexural strength sand the result are validated with Anova-One
way approach. Finally the properties of developed composite are compared with the corresponding properties of wood
and conventional wood substitute.

KEYWORDS: Ash, Human Hair, Bio Composite & Mechanical Properties

Received: Jan 31, 2017; Accepted: Feb 20, 2017; Published: Apr 13, 2017; Paper Id.: IJMPERDJUN20171

INTRODUCTION

Bio composite material are a material composed of two or more different properties dissimilar material
which exist in a different phases. Composite material are constituted of two phase; the matrix, which continuous
and surrounds the other phase, often called as reinforcing phase. Bio composite material having good strength,
low-cost, high toughness, bio-degrability composite was successfully used for many decades for all engineering
application. Composite was most commonly used in the manufacture of composite materials. Epoxy resin is widely
used as matrix in many fibre reinforced composite. The mechanical behaviour basically depends on the fibre and
fly ash strength and modulus. Epoxy resin has high chemical/ erosion resistance properties, low shrinkage on
curing. The capability to be processed under various condition and high level of cross linking epoxy resin network
to brittle material. Human hair is a material considered useless in most societies and therefore is found in the
municipal waste streams in almost all cities and towns of the world.

Even before, some efforts are made to utilize such wastes in development of composite. P. Gopinath& P.
Suresh (2014) in a work tested the mechanical behaviour of fly ash filled, woven banana fiber reinforced hybrid
composites as wood substitute. The experiments are carried out with the aid of Design Experts (Design of Expert)

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
2 Brijesh Kumar Patel, Vinod Kumar Verma, A. K. Rai & Abhishek Gaikwad

software. And the results are valid with Anova-one way approach. The develop composite was superior than the wood.

SevgiHoyur (2012): Carried a word on production of banana and glass fiber reinforced bio-composite profile and
tested its bending strength and used polyester resign as matrix. In order to gain higher strength on the outer surface, the
glass fiber and polyester binding were used in hand lay-up process. The tested result showed that the highest and lowest
bending strength for a single layer specimen were lower than double layer specimen.

Yetgin et al. (13): Studied the compression and tensile tests for five different adobe mixtures. The important part
of this study consisted of uniaxial compressive tests done with natural fiber mixtures. Thus, the results obtained from
mechanical tests were presented in the form of stress–strain graphs. In addition, mechanical properties were related to the
water content for workability, unit weight and fiber contents and discussions were given. The results show that as fiber
content increases, compressive and tensile strengths decrease, and shrinkage rates decrease.

Gassan and Bledzki [11]: Used the coupling methods to improve the properties of composites. Composites have
high level of moisture absorption, poor wet ability, and insufficient adhesion between untreated fibers and the polymer
matrix leads to debonding with age. To improve the properties of the composites, the natural reinforcing fibers can be
modified coupling methods. The coupling agents have chemical groups which can react with fiber or polymer and thus
improve the interfacial adhesion.

EXPERIMENT DETAIL
Materials

Human hair fiber collected from the local saloon. The fly ash are the wastes from the thermal power plant, are
collected from the Renusagar Power Plant, Renukoot, Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, india. The CY-230 resin of density 1.176
gm/cm3, and catalyst are collected from the Singhal Chemical Corporation, Meerut, U.P., India

Preparation of Mould

The mould is prepared for the tensile, compressive and flexural test of iron sheet on the basis of ASTM. The
mould are welded by the arc welding. The bottom of the mould is made fram a thick wood. The inner side of the mould is
coated with a releasing wax. The top of the mould is cover with a plywood sheet for applying load.

Fabrication of Composites

The resin is mixed with the fly ash in selected ratio and mixed with 2% of hardener. First of all the mould is
coated by a release anti-adhesive agent, preventing sticking the mould part to the mould surface. Layer of the resin, fly ash
mixture and reinforcing fiber fabric are applied. Hand lay-up technique are used for the fabrication and hand roller is use
for rolled on the lamina to avoid entrapped air bubbles and void. This process is repeated with four times. The part is
applied with a load of 200 N for 2 hours and cured at room temperature for 48 hour. The above steps are repeated for
preparation of all samples.

Testing Standards

After fabrication, the specimens are to be tested for tensile strength as per ASTM D638, Compressive strength as
per ASTM D695 and flexural strength as per ASTM D790. The all tested are tested by the universal testing machine.

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11


Development of Fly Ash Based New Bio-Composites Material as Wood Substitute 3

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT

Design of experiments (DOE) is the method of predicting the experimental result with minimum number of runs
for a multivariate complex problem. Design expert is a DOE software which guides in conducting minimum number of
experimental run and analysing the result. Design-Expert 10 is used and mixture design option selected as the weight
percentage one constituent affects is dependent to other constituent. In the mixture design, number of mixture components
is set as only the fly ash and human hair weight percentage are varied and epoxy resin is kept constant percentage. The
following experimental matrix of 5 number of run (Table 1) is obtained for the tensile, compressive and flexural strengths
as responses. And the tested responses are tabulated (Table 1).

Table 1: Experimental Matrix and the Tested Responses


Tensile Compressive Flexural
Epoxy Resin Fly Ash Human Hair
Run Strength Strength Strength
(wt%) (wt%) (wt%)
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
1 40 60 0 4.63 38.6 12.747
2 40 55 5 6.79 37.5 12.728
3 40 50 10 9.29 45.2 20.935
4 40 45 15 10.15 50.8 21.282
5 40 40 20 12.38 48.6 24.943

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The result is obtain Design of Expert software and the result are discuss on the Anova and graph for the tensile,
compressive and flexural strength by the The obtained result show that all tensile, compressive and flexural strength
properties are maximum at the 40 Wt% of fly ash in fly ash, human hair mixture with epoxy resin.

Table 2: Anova for Tensile strength with Design-Experts


Sum of Degree of Mean P-value
Source F value
Squares Freedom Square Prob>f
Model 35.57 1 35.57 171.42 <0.0010 Significant
Linear Mixture 35.57 1 35.57 171.42 <0.0010
Residual 0.62 3 0.21
Cor Total 36.19 4

Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
TENSILE (MPa)
Two Component Mix
Design Points
95% CI Bands 14

X1 = A: FLY ASH
X2 = B: HUMAN HAIR
12

10
TENSILE (MPa)

A: FLY A... 40 45 50 55 60
B: HUMAN... 20 15 10 5 0

Figure 1: Graph for the Tensile Properties of the Developed

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
4 Brijesh Kumar Patel, Vinod Kumar Verma, A. K. Rai & Abhishek Gaikwad

Table 3: Anova for Compressive Strength with Design-Experts


Sum of Degree of Mean P-value
Source F value
Squares Freedom square Prob>f
Model 110.89 1 110.89 11.37 0.0434 Significant
Linear Mixture 110.89 1 110.89 11.37 0.0434
Residual 29.26 3 9.75
Cor Total 140.15 4

Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
COMPRESSIVE (MPa)
Two Component Mix
Desi gn Poi nts
95% CI Bands 60

X1 = A: FLY ASH
X2 = B: HUMAN HAIR

50
COMPRESSIVE (MPa)

40

30

20

A: FLY A... 40 45 50 55 60
B: HUMAN... 20 15 10 5 0

Figure 2: Graph for the Compressive Properties of the Developed

Table 4: Anova for Flexural Strength with Design-Experts


Sum of Degree of Mean P-value
Source F value
Squares Freedom square Prob>f
Model 108.54 1 108.54 24.96 0.0154 Significant
Linear Mixture 108.54 1 108.54 24.96 0.0154
Residual 13.05 3 4.35
Cor Total 121.59 4

Design-Expert® Software
Component Coding: Actual
FLEXURAL (MPa)
Two Component Mix
Design Points
95% CI Bands 35

X1 = A: FLY ASH
X2 = B: HUMAN HAIR
30
FLEXURAL (MPa)

25

20

15

10

A: FLY A... 40 45 50 55 60
B: HUMAN... 20 15 10 5 0

Figure 3: Graph for the Tensile Properties of the Developed

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11


Development of Fly Ash Based New Bio-Composites Material as Wood Substitute 5

Maximum tensile strength of 12.38 MPa and flexural strength of 24.943MPa is obtained at 40 Wt % fly ash and
20 Wt % of human hair and maximum compressive strength of 50.8 MPa at 45 Wt % fly ash and 15 Wt % of human hair.
The graph (figure 1) shows that tensile strength and compressive strength gradually decreases over the entire range while
the flexural strength decreases suddenly.

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is made for result with the same Design-Expert software. For tensile strength
(Table 2) the model F-value of 171.42 implies the model is significant. There is only a 0.10% chance that an F-value this
large could occur due to noise. Values of "Prob> F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant. In this case
Linear Mixture Components are significant model terms. For compressive strength (Table 3) The Model F-value of 11.37
implies the model is significant. There is only a 4.34% chance that an F-value this large could occur due to noise. Values
of "Prob> F" less than 0.0500 indicate model terms are significant. In this case Linear Mixture Components are significant
model terms. For flexural strength (Table 4) The Model F-value of 24.96 implies the model is significant. There is only a
1.54% chance that an F-value this large could occur due to noise. Values of "Prob> F" less than 0.0500 indicate model
terms are significant. In this case Linear Mixture Components are significant model terms.

Table 5: Properties of Developed Composites Compared with


Wood and Conventional Wood Substitutes
Developed Medium Density
Material Teak Wood
Composites Fiber Board
Tensile strength (MPa) 4.63 -12.38 0.6 - 0.7 4.0 - 5.0
Compressive strength (MPa) 37.5 - 50.8 10.0 - 15 40.0-49.0
Flexural strength (MPa) 12.72- 24.94 20.0- 35.0 18.0- 20.0

CONCLUSIONS

The tensile, compressive and flexural strength of the developed composites of different weight percentages of fly
ash, human hair are significant. With the consideration, based on the application and strength required, the weight
percentage of the fly ash in fly ash, human hair could be varied with fixed weight percentage of epoxy resin. And the
properties are comparatively high with the properties of teak wood and medium density fiber boards. Thus the developed
composites would be a high performing, economical wood substitute.

Causal Productions permits the distribution and revision of these templates on the condition that Causal
Productions is credited in the revised template as follows: “original version of this template was provided by courtesy of
Causal Productions (www.causalproductions.com)”.

REFERENCES

1. Ramnath B. V., Manickavasagam V. M. Elanchezhian C., Krishna C. V., Karthik S. and Saravanan H. 2014. Determination of
mechanical properties of intra-layer abaca-jute-glass fiber reinforced composite. Materials & Design, Vol. 60 pp. 643-652.

2. M. Ramesh, Palanikumar K, Hemachandra Reddy K, Mechanical propertiy evaluation of sisal—jute-glass fiber reinforced
polyster composites, Composites Part B, vol 48 pp. 1-9, 2012.

3. M. Sapuan, ALeene, Mohamed Harimi, and Yeo Kiam Beng. “Mechanical property of woven Bananna Fiber Reinforced
Epoxy Composities” Material & Design (Elsever Science) Vol. 28.8 pp. 689-693, (2016)

4. Zhang J., and Kaur J., Rajkhowa R., Li J. L., Liu X. Y. and Wang X. G. 2013. Mechanical properties and structure of silkworm

www.tjprc.org [email protected]
6 Brijesh Kumar Patel, Vinod Kumar Verma, A. K. Rai & Abhishek Gaikwad

cocoons: a comparative study of bombyxmori. Antheraeaassamensis, Antheraeaperrnyi and Antheraeamylitta silkworm


cocoons. Material Science and Engineering: C, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 3206-3213.

5. M. Boopalan, M. Niranjana, M. J. Umapathy, Study on the mechanical properties and the thermal properties of jute and
banana fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composite, Composites Part B 51 (2013) 54-57

6. Sanjay Choudhry, and BhawanaPandey: Mechanical Behaviour of Polypropylene and Humar Hair Fibers and Polyproprylene
Reinforced Polymeric Composites:, Internation Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, ISSn No. 6477, Vol-2, Issu-
1, (2012).

7. D. Dash, S. Samanta, S. S. Gautam, M. Murlidhar. Mechanical Characterization of Natural fiber reinforced composte
materials, Advanced Material manufacturing & Characterization Vol 3 Issue 1, 2013.

8. Valadez-Gonzalez A., Cervantes-Uc J. M., Olayo R. And Herrera-Franco P. J. 1999. Effect of fiber surface treatment on the
fiber-matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part B; Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 309-
320.

9. C. Y. Lai, S. M. Sapuan, M. Ahmad, and N. Yahya, “Mechanical and Electriacl Properties of coconut Coir Fiber-Reinforced
Polypropylene Composites”, Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, Vol 44, pp.619-632, (2005).

A. Karnik, “Performance of TCP congestion control with rate feedback: TCP/ABR and rate adaptive TCP/IP,” M. Eng. thesis,
Indian Institute ofScience, Bangalore, India, Jan. 1999.

10. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, and D. Towsley, “A stochastic model of TCP Renocongestion avoidance and control,” Univ. of
Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, CMPSCI Tech. Rep. 99-02, 1999.

11. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, IEEE Std. 802.11, 1997

Impact Factor (JCC): 6.8765 NAAS Rating: 3.11

View publication stats

You might also like