0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views

Lect.4 - Fundamentals of Particle Swarm Optimization

The document discusses collective intelligence and self-organization emerging from the interaction of simple agents following basic rules. It describes particle swarm optimization, where agents or "particles" in a swarm adjust their position and velocity based on their own experience and the experiences of neighboring particles, in order to locate optimal solutions through collaboration rather than centralized control. Particle swarm optimization is inspired by flocking behavior in nature and provides an efficient global optimization algorithm with few parameters and easy implementation.

Uploaded by

Amany El-zonkoly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views

Lect.4 - Fundamentals of Particle Swarm Optimization

The document discusses collective intelligence and self-organization emerging from the interaction of simple agents following basic rules. It describes particle swarm optimization, where agents or "particles" in a swarm adjust their position and velocity based on their own experience and the experiences of neighboring particles, in order to locate optimal solutions through collaboration rather than centralized control. Particle swarm optimization is inspired by flocking behavior in nature and provides an efficient global optimization algorithm with few parameters and easy implementation.

Uploaded by

Amany El-zonkoly
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

“The emergent collective intelligence of

groups of simple agents.”


(Bonabeau et al, 1999)
 Composed of many individuals
 Individuals are homogeneous
 Local interaction based on simple rules
 Self-organization ( No centralized
Control)
 Inspired from the nature social behavior and dynamic
movements with communications of insects, birds and
fish
 In 1986, Craig Reynolds described this process in 3
simple behaviors:

Separation Alignment Cohesion


avoid crowding local move towards the average move toward the average
flockmates heading of local position of local
flockmates flockmates
 Application to optimization: Particle Swarm
Optimization

 Proposed by James Kennedy & Russell Eberhart (1995)

 Combines self-experiences with social experiences


 Uses a number of agents (particles)
that constitute a swarm moving
around in the search space looking
for the best solution

 Each particle in search space adjusts


its “flying” according to its own
flying experience as well as the
flying experience of other particles
 Inspired by social behavior of bird
flocking and fish schooling
 So what is the best strategy to locate
the food?
 Suppose a group of birds is searching
food in an area
 Only one piece of food is available
 Birds do not have any knowledge about
the location of the food
 But they know how far the food is from
their present location
 The best strategy is to follow the bird
nearest to the food
 A flying bird has a position and a velocity at any time
 In search of food, the bird changes his position by
adjusting the velocity
 The velocity changes based on his past experience
and also the feedbacks received from his neighbor
 Each solution is considered as bird, called particle
 All the particles have a fitness value. The fitness values can
be calculated using objective function
 All the particles preserve their individual best performance
 They also know the best performance of their group
 They adjust their velocity considering their best
performance and also considering the best performance of
the best particle
 Collection of flying particles (swarm) - Changing
solutions

 Search area - Possible solutions

 Movement towards a promising area to get the global


optimum

 Each particle keeps track:


• its best solution, personal best, pbest

• the best value of any particle, global best, gbest


 Each particle adjusts its travelling speed dynamically
corresponding to the flying experiences of itself and
its colleagues
 Each particle modifies its position according to:
• its current position
• its current velocity

• the distance between its current position and


pbest

• the distance between its current position and


gbest
My best
perf.
pi
Here I The best
am! x perf. of my
pg
neighbours

v
Random
position
Regular
position
Velocity
• It's also common to see PSO
geographical
algorithms using population
topologies, or
"neighborhoods", which can be
smaller, localized subsets of
the global best value.

• Although some variants use a


“geographical” social
neighbourhood, that is to say
compute distances and take
the nearest particles, the most
widely used neighbourhood is
a “social” one: just a list of
neighbours, regardless where
they are.
• Usually, in practice, social
neighbourhoods are defined
just once, at the very
beginning, which is consistent
with the principle “simple
rules for simple agents”.

• The use of neighborhoods


often help the algorithm to
avoid getting stuck in local
minima.
global
 Advantages
• Insensitive to scaling of design variables
• Simple implementation
• Easily parallelized for concurrent processing
• Very few algorithm parameters
• Very efficient global search algorithm

 Disadvantages
• Tendency to a fast and premature convergence in mid optimum
points
• Slow convergence in refined search stage (weak local search
ability)

You might also like