0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views2 pages

Numerical Modeling of Antenna Radiation Patterns

The document describes two methods for numerically modeling the main lobe radiation pattern of a directive antenna: (1) using a Gaussian function defined by the 3dB beamwidth in azimuth and elevation and peak antenna gain, and (2) using a sin(x)/x function defined similarly. Both methods allow modeling the antenna pattern and converting to decibel gain. A example visualization compares the patterns produced by the two models.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views2 pages

Numerical Modeling of Antenna Radiation Patterns

The document describes two methods for numerically modeling the main lobe radiation pattern of a directive antenna: (1) using a Gaussian function defined by the 3dB beamwidth in azimuth and elevation and peak antenna gain, and (2) using a sin(x)/x function defined similarly. Both methods allow modeling the antenna pattern and converting to decibel gain. A example visualization compares the patterns produced by the two models.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Numerical modeling of antenna radiation patterns with a Gaussian function

For purposes of this class, we can model the main-lobe radiation pattern of a directive antenna as follows.

Define βφ to be the 3-dB beamwidth in azimuth (author's notation is Δφ)


Define βθ to be the 3-dB beamwidth in elevation (author's notation is Δθ)
Define Go to be the peak antenna gain (Go ≈ 4π/βφ βθ)

The main-lobe pattern can be modeled as

⎡ ⎛ ⎛ θ ⎞ 2 ⎛ φ ⎞ 2 ⎞⎤
G (θ, φ) = G o exp ⎢− 2.773 ⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ ⎟⎥
⎢ ⎜ ⎝ β θ ⎠ ⎜ β φ ⎟ ⎟⎥
⎣ ⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ⎠⎦

where θ = 0 and φ = 0 corresponds to the direction of maximum gain (broadside).

The results are independent of which angular units you use (degrees or radians ) as long as you use the same units for both
the numerator (θ and φ) and the denominator (βθ and βφ).

For antenna orientation with maximum gain not at θ = 0 and φ = 0, then

⎡ ⎛ ⎛ θ − θ ⎞ 2 ⎛ φ − φ ⎞ 2 ⎞⎤
G (θ, φ) = G o exp ⎢ − 2.773 ⎜ ⎜⎜ o
⎟⎟ + ⎜ o ⎟ ⎟⎥

⎢ ⎜ β ⎜ β ⎟ ⎟⎥
⎣ ⎝ ⎝ θ ⎠ ⎝ φ ⎠ ⎠⎦

where θo and φo represent the direction of maximum gain.

To convert the gain values into decibels, use

G dB (θ, φ) = 10 log10 [ G (θ, φ) ]

which simplifies to

⎛ ⎛ θ − θ ⎞2 ⎛ φ − φ ⎞2 ⎞
G dB (θ, φ) = G o (dB) − 12 ⎜ ⎜⎜ o
⎟ +⎜ o ⎟ ⎟
⎜ ⎝ β θ ⎟⎠ ⎜ β φ ⎟ ⎟
⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ⎠
5 5
o
Gaussian model β θ = 10
o
0 φ = 0 0

-5 -5
Gain (dB)

-10 -10

-15 -15

-20 -20

-25 -25

-30 -30
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

θ (deg)

Example result

1
Numerical modeling of antenna radiation patterns with a sin(x)/x function

For purposes of this class, we can model the main-lobe radiation pattern of a directive antenna as follows.

Define βφ to be the 3-dB beamwidth in azimuth (author's notation is Δφ)


Define βθ to be the 3-dB beamwidth in elevation (author's notation is Δθ)
Define Go to be the peak antenna gain

The main-lobe pattern can be modeled as

⎛ sin ( 2.773 θ β θ ) ⎞ ⎛ sin ( 2.773 φ β φ ) ⎞


2 2

G (θ, φ) = G o ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ 2.773 φ β ⎟
⎝ 2.773 θ β θ ⎠ ⎝ φ ⎠
To convert the gain values into decibels, use

G dB (θ, φ) = 10 log10 [ G (θ, φ) ]

5 5
o
Sin(x)/x model β θ = 10
o
0 φ =0 0

-5 -5
Gain (dB)

-10 -10

-15 -15

-20 -20

-25 -25

-30 -30
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

θ (deg)

Example result

5 5
o
Comparison of β θ = 10
o
0 both models φ = 0
0

-5 -5
Gain (dB)

-10 -10

-15 -15

-20 -20

-25 -25

-30 -30
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20

θ (deg)

Results from both models

You might also like