Population Geography
Population Geography
Population Geography
John I. Clarke, who is credited with bringing out the first textbook on the sub-discipline in
1965 suggested that population geography is mainly concerned with demonstrating how
spatial variation in population and its various attributes like composition, migration
and growth are related to the spatial variation in the nature of places.
Daniel Noin in 1979, in his book Geographie de la population, while agreeing with the
scheme of Trewartha, expressed that distribution of population, components of its growth and
characteristics are the main concerns of population geography. More recently, while
discussing the methodological problems in population geography, R.J. Proyer suggested that
population geography deals with the analysis and explanation of interrelationship between
population phenomena and the geographical character of places as they both vary over space
and time.
The early works of George (1951) and the influential statement of Trewartha before the
annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers in 1953 are often considered as
the turning point in the emergence of population geography as a separate field within
geographical studies. Growing availability of population statistics has played a crucial role in
the emergence of population geography. The UN agencies began publishing demographic
statistics on a regular basis soon after the end of the Second World War.
The UN also played a significant role in making the census data uniform and comparable
across different countries by issuing guidelines and principles for census taking. The political
and societal conditions, both during and after the wars, necessitated a geographical study of
the ethnic composition of population of different regions.
The need for a more detailed account of other demographic characteristics resulted in a
switch over from macro to micro level studies, which, in turn, facilitated population mapping.
Population mapping has a long tradition in geography. In the earlier periods such maps were
largely confined to distribution and density aspects. The growing availability of population
data after the Second World War facilitated mapping of the other demographic attributes
pertaining to different regions of the world.
The most significant authors who worked on defining population geography were French
geographers P. George (1951, 1959), Beaujen-Garnier (1965, 1966); North-american
geographers: G. Trewarta (1953, 1969), W. Bunge (1962), J. Clance (1965, 1971), W.
Zelinski (1966); in Great Britain. Those authors and their works had the significant influence
on the development of population science in the world and also in Serbia. Although the
development of population geography was different in different countries and scientific
research centers, we can clearly defined four stages.
First stage lasted untill 1960s and was characterised by works of G.Trewarta, H.
Doerres Ju.G. Sauškin, D.N. Anučin, J. Beaujeu-Gariner. G. Trewarta argued that the
population is the point of reference from which all other elements are observed and from
which all derive significance and meaning. This view was adopted and shared by authors
dealing with population items, explicitly or implicitly.
Second stage lasted from 1960s till 1970s and the most significant authors dealing
with population problems were W. Zelinsky, W. Bunge; H.Bobek, W. Hartke, K.Ruppert,
F.Schaffer; D.I. Valentej, K.Korčak. This phase was characterized by the application of
quantitative methods and efforts for understanding the spatial structure of the population.
Many scientists see this development phase as a particularly prosperous period, because it
carried more intensive relations of geography and demography through the introduction of
statistical, mathematical and demographic methods and techniques in studies of population
geography.
Third phase lasted from 1970s to 1980s, and was characterized by close relations
between population geography and formal demography. Development and application of GIS
and computer data, have made population studies more complex and applicable in practice,
through population policy and population projections. The most significant authors in this
period were L. Kosinski, A. Jagelski, Hägerstrand.
And at last, fourth stage started in 1980s and in many countries lastes until
present days. In population geography appeared new tendencies associated with the critique
of positivism, the establishment of humanistic approaches and modifications of general
geographic concepts. In this period, spatial analysis and quantitative scientific methods were
reaffirmed, and because of that some population studies were redefined in spatial
demography, a time dimension advocated in historical demography. In this context, we
emphasize the work of D. Plane and P. Rogerson. Population geography is viewed differently
from one country to another. Its definition differs from too narrow to overly broad. But two
research areas were of particular interest to geographers - population distribution and
migration. Both items acquired an international dimension. Recently, eminent population
geographers exchanged various view points in an attempt to provoke new thinking on subject
and define the answers of new fields research in population geography. Population geography
in the XXI Century is no longer a field comprised of spatial applications of fertility, mortality
and migration only. Contemporary population geography is theoretically sophisticated,
integrating spatial analysis, GIS and geo-referenced data. Future progress in the field of
population geography will derive from more research at the intersections of population
processes and societal issues and concerns.
To conclude, the main concern of population geography revolves round the following
three aspects of human population:
1. Size and distribution, including the rural-urban distribution of population.
2. Population dynamics – past and present trends in growth and its spatial manifestation;
components of population change, viz., fertility, mortality and migration.
In addition to the above, as government policies and measures in a country have significant
bearings on population and its various attributes, a population geographers also concerns
himself with policies and programmes designed to regulate population size and its attributes.
There exists a very intimate association between population size and economic development.
Expanding population is generally viewed as a deterrent to economic progress in a country.
Of late, deteriorating environmental quality the world over is also being attributed to rapid
growth in population.
However, the nature of the precise link between population growth and environmental
degradation, on the one hand, and economic development and environmental degradation, on
the other, varies a great deal from one part of the earth to another depending upon various
social and economic parameters. These and similar other issues, therefore, also form part of
the overall concern of a population geographer.
Relationship of Population Geography with other sciences: