Unit 3 Notes
Unit 3 Notes
The realm of managers is expanding. As a leader, you’ll be a role model in the organization,
setting the tone not just for what gets done but how it gets done.
Henri Fayol
1. Specialization/Division of Labor
2. Authority/Responsibility Managers
● must have the authority to issue commands, but with that authority comes the
responsibility to ensure that the work gets done.
3. Discipline
But good discipline is the result of effective leadership: workers must understand
the rules and management should use penalties judiciously if workers violate the
rules.
4. Unity of Command
● An employee should receive orders only from one boss to avoid conflicting
instructions.
5. Unity of Direction
● Each unit or group has only one boss and follows one plan so that work is
coordinated
● The interests of one person should never take precedence over what is best for
the company as a whole.
7. Remuneration
8. Centralization
9. Line of Authority
● The line of authority moves from top management down to the lowest ranks. This
hierarchy is necessary for the unity of command, but communication can also
occur laterally if the bosses are kept aware of it. The line should not be
overextended or have too many levels.
10. Order
11. Equity
Fairness (equity), dignity, and respect should pervade the organization. Bosses must
treat employees well, with a “combination of kindliness and justice.”
13. Initiative
● Allowing everyone in the organization the right to create plans and carry them out
will make them more enthusiastic and will encourage them to work harder.
● Harmony and team spirit across the organization build morale and unity.
• Organization charts are a vital tool of management and can be classified into three
broad categories: hierarchical, matrix, and flat (or horizontal).
● is a system of task, reporting, and authority relationships within which the work of
the organization is done.
• Organizational structures
- the basis by which an organization groups tasks together. There are five
common approaches: functional, divisional, matrix, team, and network.
• Centralization occurs
• Decentralization occurs
Administrative Hierarchy
Departmentalization Organization
refers to work organizations that are divided into separate departments each with
specialized functions.
Thus each unique product or service the company is producing will have its own
department.
Within each department, functions such as marketing, manufacturing, and other roles
are replicated.
Functional structures tend to be effective when an organization does not have a large
number of products and services requiring special attention.
When a company has a diverse product line, each product will have unique demands,
deeming divisional (or product-specific) structures more useful for promptly addressing
customer demands and anticipating market changes.
Functional structures are more effective in stable environments that are slower to
change. In contrast, organizations using product divisions are more agile and can
perform better in turbulent environments.
The type of employee who will succeed under each structure is also different.
There are two basic perspectives about who reports to whom and who has authority
and responsibility.
1. Chain of command
2. Unity of command
● holds that no subordinate should receive direction from more than one superior.
In the session on departmentalization you will realize that the matrix structure
breaks this principle.
Mechanistic Structures
- employees are given specific job descriptions delineating their roles and
responsibilities.
- often rigid and resist change, making them unsuitable for innovativeness and
taking quick action.
- they also limit individual autonomy and self-determination, which will likely lead to
lower levels of intrinsic motivation on the job.
- employees are asked to perform duties based on the specific needs of the
organization at the time as well as their own expertise levels.
- pyramids/hierarchies
- committees/juries
- matrix organizations
- ecologies.
● A pyramid/hierarchy
- has a leader who is responsible for making all decisions that affect the
organization. This leader manages other organizational members.
● Committees/juries
● In ecologies
Matrix Organizations
Employees reporting to department managers are also pooled together to form project
or product teams.
Product managers have control and say over product-related matters, while department
managers have authority over matters related to company policy
Using the matrix structure may increase communication and cooperation among
departments because project managers will need to coordinate their actions with those
of department managers.
Matrix structure increases the frequency of informal and formal communication within
the organization.
Matrix structures also have the benefit of providing quick responses to technical
problems and customer demands.
The existence of a project manager keeps the focus on the product or service provided.
In a matrix, each employee reports to two or more managers. This situation is ripe for
conflict.
Because multiple managers are in charge of guiding the behaviors of each employee,
there may be power struggles or turf wars among managers.
From the employee’s perspective, there is potential for interpersonal conflict with team
members as well as with leaders.
The presence of multiple leaders may create role ambiguity or, worse, role
conflict—being given instructions or objectives that cannot all be met because they are
mutually exclusive.
The necessity to work with a team consisting of employees with different functional
backgrounds increases the potential for task conflict at work.
Solving these problems requires a great level of patience and proactivity on the part of
the employee.
Boundaryless Organizations
● Modular Organization
The idea behind this format is to retain only the value-generating and
strategic functions in-house, while the rest of the operations are
outsourced to many suppliers.
● Strategic alliances
Boundaryless organizations
may involve eliminating the barriers separating employees; these may be intangible
barriers, such as traditional management layers, or actual physical barriers, such as
walls between different departments.
Structures such as self-managing teams create an environment where employees
coordinate their efforts and change their own roles to suit the demands of the situation,
as opposed to insisting that something is “not my job.”
Learning Organizations
● is one whose design actively seeks to acquire knowledge and change behavior
as a result of the newly acquired knowledge.
Learning organizations:
there are many procedures and systems in place that facilitate learning at all
organizational levels.
experimentation and testing which are potentially better operational methods are
encouraged.
Planning
The reason is simple: if you don’t know where you’re going, you can’t really move
forward.
Successful managers decide where they want to be and then figure out how to get
there.
In planning, managers set goals and determine the best way to achieve them.
Planning
● environmental scanning
● forecasting
● setting objectives
● charting alternative courses of action to achieve objectives
● decision making
● implementation
● review of plans where necessary
Plans differ
● in usage
Strategic Plan
● Strategic planning
To begin this process, you should ask yourself a couple of very basic questions:
● Write a mission statement that tells customers, employees, and others why your
organization exists.
● Identify core values or beliefs that will guide the behavior of members of the
organization.
● Establish goals and objectives, or performance targets, to direct all the activities
that you’ll perform to achieve your mission.
● Develop and implement tactical and operational plans to achieve goals and
objectives.
Mission Statement
Core Values
- the small set of guiding principles that you identify as crucial to your company
fundamental beliefs about what’s important and what is and isn’t appropriate in
conducting company activities
matching the strengths of your business with the opportunities available to it.
A SWOT Analysis
Descriptive plans:
Plans can also be presented graphically and show what is to be achieved and how in
charts.
The planning process begins at the top of the organization, where upper-level managers
create a strategic plan, but it doesn’t end there. The execution of the strategic plan
involves managers at all levels.
Tactical Plans
- Are plans that are broken down into more manageable, shorter-term components
These plans specify the activities and allocation of resources (people, equipment,
money) needed to implement the overall strategic plan over a given period.
Operational Plans
Contingency Planning
With contingency planning, managers identify those aspects of the business that are
most likely to be adversely affected by change. Then, they develop alternative courses
of action in case an anticipated change does occur.
Crisis Management
Organizations also face the risk of encountering crises that require immediate attention.
Rather than waiting until such a crisis occurs and then scrambling to figure out what to
do, many firms practice crisis management.
Set Goals and Objectives
Goals
- are major accomplishments that the company wants to achieve over a long
period (say, five years).
Objectives
- are shorter-term performance targets that direct the activities of the organization
toward the attainment of a goal.
● specific
● measurable
● achievable
● realistic
● Timely
Steps in goal-setting:
If goals are not being met, it is management’s responsibility to restart the process and
change them as needed.
Classical Theories
The classical theories include: the ideal bureaucracy of Max Weber, the organizing
principles of Henri Fayol, and the human organization principle of Rensis Likert.
Bureaucracy
Management Functions
A second classic view was presented at the turn of the century by Henri Fayol. He
was the first to classify the essential elements of management – now commonly called
management functions – as planning, organizing, command, coordination, and control.
In addition, he presented a list of 14 principles of organizing that he considered an
indispensable code for managers. Fayol’s principles have served as the basis for the
development of generally accepted means of organizing - i.e., unity of command and
unity of direction. Combining these two principles with division of labor, authority and
responsibility results in a system of tasks and reporting relationships that are essential
to organizing. Fayol’s principles thus provide the framework for the organization
chart and the coordination of work.
Human Organization
Rensis Likert called his approach to organization structure the human organization.
Likert’s approach centered on the principles of supportive relationships, employee
participation, and overlapping work groups. Management’s function is to ensure
that the work groups are linked for effective coordination and communication.
• The principle of overlapping work groups advocates that work groups are linked
to managers, who serve as linking pins between groups. Each manager (except the
highest ranking) is a member of two groups: a work group that he or she supervises
and a management group composed of the manager’s peers and their supervisor.
Likert believed that work groups should be able to overlap horizontally as well as
vertically where necessary to accomplish tasks.
Contingency Theories
• The most appropriate structure and system of management is dependent upon the
contingencies of the situation for each particular organization.
• Contingency Theory takes the view that there is no one best, universal structure.
Burns and Stalker identified two divergent systems of management practice and
structure – the ‘mechanistic’ system and the ‘organic’ system. These represented
the form which such systems could take when adapted to technical and commercial
change.