Iso 20022 Prog Flow Transl
Iso 20022 Prog Flow Transl
This document describes the multi-format ISO 20022 Business Message containing an embedded equivalent MT.
19 August 2022
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................................2
Preface .................................................................................................................................................3
1 Overview of In-flow Translation ..............................................................................................4
2 Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items ................................................5
2.1 Mapping to MT Blocks.............................................................................................................7
2.2 Translation Reporting ............................................................................................................11
2.2.1 Translation Result – TROK .........................................................................................12
2.2.2 Translation Result – TRNR .........................................................................................13
2.2.3 Translation Result – TRFR .........................................................................................18
2.2.4 Translation Result – TRNK .........................................................................................20
2.2.5 Translation Result – TRAK .........................................................................................21
2.2.6 Translation Result with Multiple Translation Result codes .........................................24
3 Handling Multi-format MX in Applications ...........................................................................30
4 Pilot Services and Translation ..............................................................................................31
Appendix A........................................................................................................................................32
Appendix B........................................................................................................................................33
Appendix C........................................................................................................................................41
Legal Notices ....................................................................................................................................42
19 August 2022 2
Preface
Preface
About this document
This document describes the in-flow translation from ISO 20022 Business Messages to their
equivalent MT.
Intended audience
This document describes In-flow translation service. It should be read by:
Related documentation
19 August 2022 3
Overview of In-flow Translation
In-flow Translation occurs only in one direction i.e., ISO 20022 MX to MT. The CBPR+
translation rules are published on MyStandards (Translation Rules). In-flow translation is
activated by default for all new or existing participants on the various FINplus services and
covers all eligible messages. Participants can request deactivation of in-flow translation for
part or all of their BIC8s in each FINplus service through e-order forms to be made available
end August 2022.
A configuration screen offering more granularity in the deactivation of in-flow translation
(BICs, request types, currencies) will be made available in the fourth quarter of 2022.
19 August 2022 4
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
The ISO 20022 Business Application Header is mandatory in the translation rules specified in
this document.
The format includes network specific items and information provided by the creator of the
message.
The translation towards a FIN MT is described in section "Multi-format MX".
19 August 2022 5
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Translation scope
The translation scope is the ISO 20022 MX message format only and the source of the
translated messages are based on the CBPR+ usage guidelines (CBPR + UG). Translation
copes with the CBPR+ usage guidelines schemas, the MT formats and rules (CBPR+
Translation Rules) . The network-related parts are not translated, except those that are
important business wise (Network Validation Rules).
19 August 2022 6
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
This can be safely done because the three characters "~", "^" and "[" are not part of any MT
character set.
Example of the RequestPayload that is provided to your messaging interface:
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>...</Document>
<!--{1:F01BANKBEBBXXXX0000000000}{2:O1030840190320SENDBEBBXXXX00000000001
903200841U}{3:{121:uetr value}}{4:^~:20:trn^~:32A:190320EUR5000,50^~...^~
-}{5:{CHK:ABCD12345678}}-->
<!-- TranslationResult=CODE -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
Other info as applicable (e.g. list of fields that could not be
translated fully) -->
</SwInt:RequestPayload>
The first comment contains the translated MT, while the other comments contain information
about the translation itself.
As shown the whitespace between the markup of the start <!-- and of the end of the
comment --> and the content of the comment should be ignored.
Your messaging interface may interpret these characters and make the resulting MT format
available as it would do for a normally received MT over FIN.
The following sections describe each comment.
19 August 2022 7
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Note The Logical Terminal Address may be derived differently for pilot services which
translate to FIN Test and Training, see section Pilot services and translation.
19 August 2022 8
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Note The BIC in the Message Input Reference may be derived differently for pilot
services which translate to FIN Test and Training, see section Pilot services and
translation.
Note The output date and time is generated at the time the translation is invoked. The
business wise important timestamp is the input date and time, which is translated
correctly into the block 2 fields, based on the time zone of the sender BIC.
The value contains the field number and an example of a value if applicable.
19 August 2022 9
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Block 4 - text
Block 5 - Trailers
19 August 2022 10
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Note The list of trailers reflects those that are available at the time of publication of this
document.
TRAK Almost success where the resulting MT is valid but not all elements of the ISO 20022
message end up in the translated MT
19 August 2022 11
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
• A code indicating the type of issue encountered; the codes start with a letter ‘T’
• The path of the element on which the issue was detected
• A short description of the issue
It is expected that in most cases the code will be TROK, TRAK or TRNR
19 August 2022 12
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>...</Document>
<!
{1:F01BANKBEBBXXXX0000000000}{2:O1030840190320SENDBEBBXXXX000000000019032
00841U}{3:{121:uetr value}}{4:^~:20:trn^~:32A:190320EUR5000,50^~...^~
}{5:{CHK:ABCD12345678}}-->
<!-- TranslationResult= TROK -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
Other info as applicable (e.g. list of fields that could not be
translated fully) -->
</SwInt:RequestPayload>
In case of ‘TRNR’ code, the ISO 20022 message has truncation or character replacement for ‘Non-
reference fields. The values from the non-reference fields in the ISO message are either truncated or
replaced by a dot(.) to comply with MT validation rules . E.g., special character ‘#’ is supported in ISO
20022 MX message but will be replaced by a ‘dot(.)’ while translating to MT as it does not support this
special character.
In another example, if any one of the’ address’ line element is empty out of the three line elements or if
any of the address line element has spaces then that specific line will be truncated in the translated
MT.(Refer to example below)
19 August 2022 13
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
In the case of a TRNR code, the message description contains path of the element where the error occurred
along with the short description.
Refer TRNR section in Appendix B.
From the translated MT, itis recommended to use the references of field:20 and :21 to reconcile the
messages, in case the translation result code is other than TRFR.
It is not recommended to use the translated MT for the purposes such as compliance checking, since
truncated data may not serve the purpose.
Example of xml message that would trigger code ‘TRNR’ .
a) Highlighted yellow field in the below sample indicates “empty spaces”
19 August 2022 14
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<Dbtr>
<Nm>ABC COMPANY INC</Nm>
<PstlAdr>
<AdrLine>CANARY WHARF </AdrLine>
<AdrLine> </AdrLine>
<AdrLine> GB</AdrLine>
</PstlAdr>
</Dbtr>
<DbtrAgt>
<FinInstnId></FinInstnId>
</DbtrAgt>
<CdtrAgt>
<FinInstnId></FinInstnId>
</CdtrAgt>
<Cdtr>
<Nm>XYZ EXPORTS INC </Nm>
<PstlAdr>
<BldgNb>7</BldgNb>
<BldgNm>TIMES SQUARE BUILDING</BldgNm>
<Flr>45</Flr>
<PstCd>NY 10036</PstCd>
<TwnNm>MANHATTAN</TwnNm>
<Ctry>US</Ctry>
</PstlAdr>
</Cdtr>
<RmtInf>
<Strd>
<RfrdDocInf>
<LineDtls>
<Id></Id>
</LineDtls>
</RfrdDocInf>
</Strd>
</RmtInf>
….</Document>
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with TRNR error code:
19 August 2022 15
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<!--
{1:F01CCLAUS30XIFT0000000000}{2:O1030912220204CCLAUS30XIFT00000000002202040912N}{3:{111:001}{1
21:ccf4b192-1f7b-4241-940f-
9fb62972c827}}{4:^~:20:TEST/CAM/26/001^~:23B:CRED^~:32A:210826EUR3000,^~:33B:EUR3000,^~:
50K:ABC COMPANY INC^~CANARY WHARF ^~ GB^~52A:CCLAUS33^~:57A:CCLAUS33^~: 59F:1/XYZ EXPORTS
INC ^~2/7,TIMES SQUARE BUILDING,45^~3/US/MANHATTAN,NY
10036^~:59F:/324349849854^~1/XYZ EXPORTS INC^~2/7,TIMES SQUARE BUILDING,45^~3/US/MANHATTAN,NY
10036^~:70:/ROC/E21TEST/CAM/26/001///SRI/+^~:71A:OUR^~:71G:EUR450,^~-
}{5:{CHK:54DDC5E310BB}{TNG:}} -->
19 August 2022 16
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
b) Example to indicate truncation in case there is insufficient space to map the fields further in Field
72
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<PrvsInstgAgt1>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</PrvsInstgAgt1>
<PrvsInstgAgt2>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</PrvsInstgAgt2>
<PrvsInstgAgt3>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</PrvsInstgAgt3>……
<IntrmyAgt1>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</IntrmyAgt1>
<IntrmyAgt2>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</IntrmyAgt2>
<IntrmyAgt3>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>PQVBBEBA</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</IntrmyAgt3>……….
</Document>
19 August 2022 17
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
In the translated MT there is no room left to map Previous instructing agent3 field hence resulting in data
truncation.
<!--
{1:F01PQVBBEB0XXXX0000000000}{2:O1032110220623PQVBBEB0XXXX00000000002206232110N}{3:{121:662cc3
be-c2ff-4955-87ea-
5bb9e612eb8d}{433:/AOK/EXCLUDED}}{4:^~:20:SK04044506270810^~:23B:CRED^~:32A:220528EUR110,^~:33
B:EUR100,^~:50F:/NOTPROVIDED^~1/A21,INC.^~2/CENTURION
PKWY^~3/US/JACKSONVILLE,32034,FLORIDA^~:52D:NOTPROVIDED^~:56A:PQVBBEBA^~:57D:NOTPROVIDED^~:59:
DELTA
LLOYD^~:70:/ROC/KK04044506271305^~:71A:OUR^~:71G:EUR120,^~:72:/INTA/PQVBBEBA^~/INTA/PQVBBEBA^~
/SVCLVL/BKTR^~/REC/Instruction Information^~/INS/PQVBBEBA^~/INS/PQVBBEBA^~-
}{5:{CHK:368634105C0C}{TNG:}} -->
In case of ‘TRFR’ code, the ISO 20022 message has truncation or character replacement for ‘Reference
fields’. The values from the reference fields in the ISO message are either truncated or replaced by a
dot(.) to comply with MT validation rules . Truncated fields contain as last character a "+“ (plus).
For e.g., special character ‘#’ is supported in ISO 20022 MX message but will be replaced by a ‘dot(.)’
while translating to MT as it does not support this special character.
In the case of a TRFR code, the message description contains the path of the element where the error
occurred along with the short description. It is not recommended to perform reconciliation based on the
translated MT for ‘TRFR’ codes. This is not an issue for the messaging interface as such since all
reconciliation is based on the ISO 20022 MX and not on the translated MT.
Example of xml message that would trigger code ‘TRFR’
19 August 2022 18
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<PmtId>
<InstrId>instrpacs009-001</InstrId>
<EndToEndId>e2eidentification-001-120122</EndToEndId>
<UETR>9d96eb82-07a0-4dbf-be11-ad0b81c21f9n</UETR>
</PmtId>
…………..
</Document>
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with ‘TRFR’ error code:
<!--
{1:F01CCLAUS30XIFT0000000000}{2:O2021626220112CCLAUS30XIFT00000000002201121626N}{3:
{121:9d96eb82-07a0-4dbf-be11-ad0b81c21f9n}}{4:^~:20:instrpacs009-
001^~:21:e2eidentificati+^~:32A:220110EUR5678,^~:52A:CCLAUS33^~:58A:CCLAUS33^~-
}{5:{CHK:BF2EA40CE21C}{TNG:}} -->
<!-- TranslationResult=TRFR -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "TRFR",
"message": "TRUNC_R.T0000T Field content has been truncated.\r\nValue
'e2eidentificationpacs-001-120122' has been altered.",
"path": "MT202/Block4/RelatedReference"
}
]
}
-->
19 August 2022 19
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<ChrgsInf>
<Amt Ccy="EUR">99999999999999.</Amt>
<Agt>
<FinInstnId>
<BICFI>CCLAUS33</BICFI>
</FinInstnId>
</Agt>
</ChrgsInf>
………
</Document>
19 August 2022 20
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with TRNK error code:
<!-- -->
<!-- TranslationResult=TRNK -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "TRNK",
"message": "FAILURE.T13005 Length of total charges in ChargesInformation/Amount
exceeds 14 digits. 71G is not translated to the target message.",
"path": "MT103CORE/Block4"
}
]
}
-->
**Note: Due to the complex hierarchy of XML elements with parent or child / sub-elements, the
TRAK result code may also be generated in scenarios others than the one defined in the above
table. SWIFT will update this document if such scenarios are identified.
19 August 2022 21
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<PmtId>
<InstrId>Instrid-001</InstrId>
<EndToEndId>e2eid/02/03/2022/001</EndToEndId>
<TxId>txnid-001-25042022</TxId>
<UETR>0a0ad3df-1c22-4331-a917-feb3d5ada296</UETR>
</PmtId>………
</Document>
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with TRAK error code:
<!-- -->
<!-- TranslationResult=TRAK -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "TRAK",
"message": "IGNORED.T0000M Input content is ignored.\r\nValue '<pacs:TxId>txnid-001-
25042022</pacs:TxId>' has been dropped.",
"path": "MT103CORE"
}
]
}
-->
19 August 2022 22
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
b.) Example of TRAK generated as for Structured Remittance information data not mapped to field
70 :
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<PmtId>
<InstrId>Instrid-001</InstrId>
<EndToEndId>e2eid/02/03/2022/001</EndToEndId>
<TxId>txnid-240623</TxId>
<UETR>c6776e2c-c1b4-46ef-950e-07a3aec76be4</UETR>
</PmtId>
………
<UltmtCdtr>
<Nm>MARTHA CUBA</Nm>
<Id>
<PrvtId>
<Othr>
<Id>CUST/19121958</Id>
</Othr>
</PrvtId>
</Id>
</UltmtCdtr>
<InstrForCdtrAgt>
<Cd>PHOB</Cd>
<InstrInf>+511239912</InstrInf>
</InstrForCdtrAgt>
<RmtInf>
<Strd>
<RfrdDocInf>
<Tp>
<CdOrPrtry>
<Cd>CINV</Cd>
</CdOrPrtry>
</Tp>
<Nb>12345</Nb>
<RltdDt>2022-06-24+01:00</RltdDt>
</RfrdDocInf>
</Strd>
</RmtInf>
………….
</Document>
19 August 2022 23
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with TRAK error code for
Structured remittance information (SRI+):
<!--
{1:F01PQVBBEB0XXXX0000000000}{2:O1031023220624PQVBBEB0XXXX00000000002206241023N}{3:{121:c6776e
2c-c1b4-46ef-950e-07a3aec76be4}{433:/AOK/EXCLUDED}}{4:^~:20:Instrid-
001^~:23B:CRED^~:23E:PHOB/+511239912^~:32A:220528EUR110,^~:33B:EUR100,^~:50F:/NOTPROVIDED^~1/M
r. Debtor^~2/EAST 45TH
ST,45^~3/US/MANHATTAN,834009^~:52D:NOTPROVIDED^~:57D:NOTPROVIDED^~:59F:1/Mr. Creditor
^~2/cable Walk ,56^~3/US/California,800001^~:70:/ULTB/MARTHA
CUBA/CUST/19121958///R^~OC/e2eid/02/03/2022/001///SRI/+^~:71A:OUR^~-
}{5:{CHK:5B0FAAE104E8}{TNG:}} -->
There is a possibility where in a single multi format MX message there could be multiple translation
result codes for example, TRNR, TRNK. In this case, priority should be given to the codes listed in the
below order:
19 August 2022 24
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
TROK - Translation OK
Example - if the translation code results as ‘TRFR’ and ‘TRNK’ in the same message then the priority
should be given to ‘TRNK’, and the embedded MT should not be considered for further processing.
a.) Example of xml message that would trigger multiple translation result codes - TRNK and TRFR:
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<CdtTrfTxInf>
<PmtId>
<InstrId>instrpacs009-001</InstrId>
<EndToEndId>e2eidentificationpacs009-001</EndToEndId>
<UETR>a5d94492-9ee4-46ba-baba-9cc74c51c589</UETR>
</PmtId>
<IntrBkSttlmAmt Ccy="EUR">5678.</IntrBkSttlmAmt>
<IntrBkSttlmDt>2061-02-09+01:00</IntrBkSttlmDt>
………
</Document>
19 August 2022 25
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with two translation result codes
such as TRNK and TRFR:
<!-- -->
b.) In another example, if the translation code results as ‘TRFR’ and ‘TRNR’ in the same message
then the priority should be given to ‘TRFR’
Example of xml message that would trigger multiple translation result codes- TRFR and TRNR:
19 August 2022 26
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<GrpHdr>
<MsgId>Msgidentification001</MsgId>
<CreDtTm>2022-01-07T11:04:48+01:00</CreDtTm>
</GrpHdr>
<TxInfAndSts>
<OrgnlGrpInf>
<OrgnlMsgId>OrgMsgidentification001</OrgnlMsgId>
<OrgnlMsgNmId>pacs.008.001.08</OrgnlMsgNmId>
</OrgnlGrpInf>
……..
</Document>
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with two translation result codes
such as TRFR and TRNR
<!--
{1:F01CCLAUS30XIFT0000000000}{2:O1991050220113CCLAUS30XIFT00000000002201131050N}{3:
{121:c332bcb5-39e8-4880-8a83-
da309c1fe32f}}{4:^~:20:Msgidentificati+^~:21:OrginstrId001^~:79:/REJT/99^~/AC04/^~/
MREF/OrgMsgidentific+^~/TREF/Orge2eid001^~/TEXT//UETR/c332bcb5-39e8-4880-8a83-
da309c1fe32f^~-}{5:{CHK:10707D1565B2}{TNG:}} -->
<!-- TranslationResult=TRFR -->
<!-- TranslationInfo version 1.0.0.1
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "TRFR",
"message": "TRUNC_R.T0000T Field content has been truncated.\r\nValue
'Msgidentification001' has been altered.",
"path": "MT199/Block4/TxnRefNum"
},
{
"code": "TRNR",
"message": "TRUNC_N.T0000T Field content has been truncated.\r\nValue
'OrgMsgidentification001' has been altered.",
19 August 2022 27
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
"path": "MT199/Block4/Narrative"
}
]
}
-->
c.) In another example, if the translation code results as ‘TRAK’ and ‘TRNR’ in the same message
then the priority should be given to ‘TRNR’
Example of xml message that would trigger multiple translation result codes- TRAK and TRNR:
<SwInt:RequestPayload>
<AppHdr ...>...</AppHdr>
<Document...>…..
<GrpHdr>….</GrpHdr>
<CdtTrfTxInf>
<PmtId>
<InstrId>Instrid-001</InstrId>
<EndToEndId>e2eid/02/03/2022/001</EndToEndId>
<TxId>txnid-001-25042022</TxId>
<UETR>0a0ad3df-1c22-4331-a917-feb3d5ada296</UETR>
</PmtId>
………
<Dbtr>
<Nm>ABCCOMPANYINC</Nm>
<PstlAdr>
<AdrLine>CANARY WHARF </AdrLine>
<AdrLine> </AdrLine>
<AdrLine> GB</AdrLine>
</PstlAdr>
</Dbtr>
<Cdtr>
<Nm>XYZ EXPORTS INC </Nm>
<PstlAdr>
<BldgNb>7</BldgNb>
<BldgNm>TIMES SQUARE BUILDING</BldgNm>
<Flr>45</Flr>
<PstCd>NY 10036</PstCd>
<TwnNm>MANHATTAN</TwnNm>
<Ctry>US</Ctry>
</PstlAdr>
</Cdtr>
…..</ CdtTrfTxInf>
</Document>
19 August 2022 28
Translation of Network Messaging Protocol Related Items
Based upon the above xml message, the multiformat message resulted with two translation result codes
such as TRAK and TRNR
<!--
{1:F01PQVBBEB0XXXX0000000000}{2:O1031613220530PQVBBEB0XXXX00000000002205301613N}{3:{121:0a0ad3
df-1c22-4331-a917-feb3d5ada296}{433:/AOK/EXCLUDED}}{4:^~:20:Instrid-
001^~:23B:CRED^~:32A:220528EUR110,^~:33B:EUR100,^~:50K:ABCCOMPANYINC^~CANARY
WHARF ^~ GB^~:52D:NOTPROVIDED^~:57D:NOTPROVIDED^~:59F:1/XYZ EXPORTS
INC ^~2/7,TIMES SQUARE BUILDING,45^~3/US/MANHATTAN,NY
10036^~:70:/ROC/e2eid/02/03/2022/001^~:71A:OUR^~-}{5:{CHK:34E336C3B5E2}{TNG:}} -->
The result details are in a JSON format as illustrated in the above examples.
A messaging interface may use the translation result details to offer some functionality to its users. As a
minimum the information must be stored together with the message and be available to allow for correct
interpretation and appropriate processing of the translated MT.
The list of codes is published in the SWIFTNet Link Error Codes.
19 August 2022 29
Handling Multi-format MX in Applications
19 August 2022 30
Pilot Services and Translation
19 August 2022 31
Appendix A
Note All translation rules from ISO 20022 to MT approved by the CBPR+ working
group are available and published on MyStandards
19 August 2022 32
Appendix B
This selection of samples is arranged in order of the Translation result and error codes as per the
table below and also available to download from MyStandards portal in samples library under
MT/ISO 20022 Translation section CBPR+ Landing page Each zip file aligns to the Translation
result and error codes, and contains the message samples as a Sender and a Receiver.
“In-flowTranslationResultCode_error/warning_code_messagetype.txt”
For example, TRNK_T1000E_pacs.008.txt
The message will not work “as is” in the Readiness Portal or in the FINplus Pilot future environment.
In order to test in FINplus Pilot future environment with other Bank(s) or to conduct loop back testing
with self, it is essential that users replace the DUMMY BIC in the samples provided with their own
BICs in the Application Header and Document section as a ‘Sender’ of messages. The samples
don’t include request header and cryptography/signatures added by the messaging interface.
You will need an editor to view the txt file, such as NotePad, NotePad++ or you can use a web
browser.
This selection of Translation result and error codes will increase as the In-flow Translation service
evolves; and new samples will be added if applicable.
19 August 2022 33
Appendix B
TRNK T13001 FAILURE, The amount is not MT compliant. It should consist out of 15 digits, Pacs.008,
including the comma. pacs.009,
pacs.004,
pacs.008 (swift
go), camt.057,
camt.054,
camt.053,
camt.052
TRNK T20038 FAILURE/Entry Status is not "booked". Translation is not foreseen. STOP camt.054
Translation.
TRNK T20053 FAILURE, Translation is not executed when more than 1 transaction in the pacs.008,
message. STOP Translation. pacs.009,
pacs.004,
pacs.008 (swift
go),, camt.054
TRNK T20054 FAILURE, Commodities currencies {XAU, XAG, XPD, XPT} not allowed in pacs.008,
Field 32A and 32B. STOP Translation. pacs.009,
pacs.004,
pacs.008 (swift
go),, camt.054
TRNK T20056 FAILURE/Transaction Status is different from "rejected". Translation is not pacs.002
foreseen. STOP Translation
TRNK T20104 FAILURE/Either the opening booked balance (OPBD) is missing or more camt.053
than one occurrence of OPBD on the page.
19 August 2022 34
Appendix B
TRNK T20107 FAILURE/Either the closing booked balance (CLBD) is missing or more than camt.053
one occurrence of CLBD on the page
TRNK T20110 FAILURE/Number of Entries is over the maximum allowed to guarantee camt.052,
smooth translation to MT. camt.053
TRNK T20111 FAILURE/The first two characters of the three character currency code in camt.053
fields 60a, 62a, 64 and 65 must be the same for all occurrences of these
fields. Source message is not compliant with the network validation rule
defined on the target message.
TRNK T20113 FAILURE/MX Entry amount has more than 14 digits. camt.052,
camt.053
TRNK T20114 FAILURE/At least the following must be present: Report/Entry is present OR camt.052
-Report/TransactionsSummary/TotalCreditEntries/(NumberOfEntries AND
SUM) is present OR -
Report/TransactionsSummary/TotalDebitEntries/(NumberOfEntries AND
SUM) is present Translation camt.052 to MT941 is out of scope (ie., no
balance translation).
TRNK T20116 FAILURE/All entry amounts must be expressed in Account Currency camt.052,
camt.053
TRNK T20197 FAILURE/Not expected scenario. Investigation needed. Option B or C is not pacs.008,
allowed to translate the ClearingSystemMemberID or Account in absence of pacs.009,
BIC and Name and Address. pacs.004,
camt.054,
camt.057,
pacs.008 (swift
go),
19 August 2022 35
Appendix B
TRAK – Translation Almost OK. the ISO 20022 MX message has successfully translated to MT but not
all elements of the ISO messages are translated to MT
TRNR / T0000M Input content is not mapped to target message. pacs.008, pacs.009,
TRFR Incompatible=Field content is not copied as it is incompatible pacs.002, pacs.004,
camt.029,camt.056,
camt.052,camt.053,
camt.054, camt.057
19 August 2022 36
Appendix B
TRNR / T0000E TRUNC_X/Empty line is removed as it would create a validation pacs.008, pacs.009,
TRFR error. Empty lines are caused by leading or trailing spaces in the pacs.002, pacs.004,
input data. camt.029,camt.056,
camt.052,camt.053,
camt.054,
camt.057,swiftgo
pacs.008
TRNR / T0000L TRUNC_X, Illegal characters at the beginning of the line have pacs.008, pacs.009,
TRFR been replaced. pacs.002, pacs.004,
camt.029,camt.056,
camt.052,camt.053,
camt.054,
camt.057,swiftgo
pacs.008
TROK T11005 WARNING/As per SWIFT User Handbook, Message Reference pacs.008, pacs.009,
Guides for Category 1 and Category 2, a Fedwire Routing pacs.004, camt.054,
Number in combination with a BIC (option A) must be used camt.057, pacs.008
without the 9-digit code. As the Clearing channel has no impact (swiftgo)
on the agent or has a value different from "RTGS", translation to
"//FW" might be misleading. So the ClearingSystemMemberID is
not translated.
TROK T11006 WARNING/As per SWIFT User Handbook, Message Reference pacs.008, pacs.009,
Guides for Category 1 and Category 2, for some clearing systems pacs.004, camt.054,
the use of a clearing identification in combination with a BIC (MT camt.057, pacs.008
option A) is not allowed: CHIPS Participant Identifier (“CP”), (swift go),
Russian Central Bank Identification Code (“RU”), Swiss Clearing
Code (“SW”). For that reason if the
ClearingSystemMemberIdentifier is present, it is not translated to
MT.
TROK T11007 WARNING/If the Clearing Channel is "RTGS" and BIC is present, pacs.008, pacs.009,
then ClearingSystemMemberId, if present, is not translated. Only pacs.004,camt.054,
the Clearing Channel resulting in "//RT". camt.057, pacs.008
(swift go),
TROK T12001 WARNING/Not possible to create a valid FATF ID because the pacs.008, pacs.009,
country of the issuer is missing. Dummy value is provided in pacs.004, camt.054,
Subfield1. Country from the address is used instead of country of camt.057, pacs.008
issuer. (swift go),
TROK T12002 WARNING/Not possible to create a valid FATF ID because the pacs.008, pacs.009,
country of the issuer is missing. Dummy value is provided in pacs.004, camt.054,
19 August 2022 37
Appendix B
TROK T12003 WARNING/Not possible to create a valid FATF ID because pacs.008, pacs.009,
PrivateIdentification/Other/SchemeName/Code is not in the list of pacs.004, camt.054,
codes allowed in Party Identifier (50F subfield 1). camt.057, pacs.008
(swift go),
TROK T12004 WARNING/Not possible to create a valid FATF ID. Dummy value pacs.008, pacs.009,
provided in Subfield1. pacs.004, camt.054,
camt.057, pacs.008
(swift go),
TROK T12005 WARNING/Not possible to create a valid FATF ID for option F pacs.008, pacs.009,
Subfield2 Line 6/ or 7/. Information not translated from pacs.004, camt.054,
PrivateIdentification/Other. camt.057, pacs.008
(swift go),
TROK T12010 WARNING, Not possible to create a valid FATF ID because pacs.008, pacs.009,
OrganisationIdentification/Other/SchemeName/Code is not a valid pacs.004, camt.054,
code. camt.057, pacs.008
(swift go)
TROK T14001 WARNING/Invalid data to fill MT Reference. Dummy value pacs.008, pacs.009,
provided. pacs.002, pacs.004,
camt.029,camt.056,
camt.052,camt.053,
camt.054,camt.057,
pacs.008 (swift go)
19 August 2022 38
Appendix B
TROK T20027 WARNING/Invalid BIC in /FIN53/. Code /FIN53/ not translated. pacs.008, pacs.009
TROK T20083 WARNING/Original Message Name Identification value is not camt.029, camt.056
expected. Dummy value "202" is translated.
TROK T30001 WARNING/No BIC found in tag AppHdr/Fr (business application pacs.008, pacs.009,
header). Please specify the BIC in the business application pacs.002, pacs.004,
header (BAH). Dummy values are used instead camt.029, camt.056,
camt.052, camt.053,
camt.054, camt.057,
pacs.008 (swift go)
19 August 2022 39
Appendix B
TROK T30002 WARNING/No BIC found in tag AppHdr/To (business application pacs.008, pacs.009,
header). Please specify the BIC in the business application pacs.002, pacs.004,
header (BAH). Dummy values are used instead camt.029, camt.056,
camt.052, camt.053,
camt.054, camt.057,
pacs.008 (swift go)
TROK T15002 WARNING/"SDVA" code in ServiceLevel and "HOLD" or "CHQB" pacs.008, pacs.009
code in InstructionForCreditorAgent generates an invalid MT.
Code in conflict with SDVA (HOLD or CHQB) is deleted and
therefore missing in translated message.
TROK T15003 WARNING/"INTC" code or "CORT" code in CategoryPurpose and pacs.008, pacs.009
"HOLD" or "CHQB" code in InstructionForCreditorAgent
generates an invalid MT. Code in conflict with INTC or CORT
(HOLD or CHQB) is deleted and therefore missing in translated
message.
TROK T20224 WARNING, ClearingChannel cannot be translated twice to two pacs.008, pacs.009.
agents. It has been removed from the second agent. pacs.008 (swift go)
TROK T20225 WARNING, ClearingChannel cannot be translated twice to two pacs.008, pacs.009.
agents. Investigations is needed specially for translation to option pacs.008 (swift go)
B or C (if only the ClearingChannel is available without data for
the ClearingSystemMemberID).
19 August 2022 40
Appendix C
19 August 2022 41
Legal Notices
Legal Notices
Copyright
S.W.I.F.T. SC ("SWIFT") or its licensors © 2022. All rights reserved.
Restricted Distribution
Do not distribute this publication outside your organisation unless your subscription or order
expressly grants you that right, in which case ensure you comply with any other applicable
conditions.
The laws of Belgium shall govern the terms and conditions for the use of this publication,
and the courts of Brussels shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes arising from
or in connection with the use of or any information in this publication.
The English version of SWIFT documentation is the only official and binding version.
Trademarks
SWIFT is the trade name of S.W.I.F.T. SC. The following are registered trademarks of SWIFT:
3SKey, Innotribe, MyStandards, Sibos, SWIFT, SWIFTNet, SWIFT Institute, the Standards Forum
logo, the SWIFT logo, SWIFT gpi with logo, the SWIFT gpi logo, and UETR. Other product,
service, or company names in this publication are trade names, trademarks, or registered
trademarks of their respective owners.
19 August 2022 42