Concept Paper

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction………………………………………….……….…….... 1

Background of the study…………………….……………...2

Preliminary Literature Review………….……….………3

Statement of the Problem………………….……………...4

Methodology……………………………………….………………..4

Timeline……………………………………………………….………..5

References…………………………………………………………...5
MAHAYAG SCHOOL OF ARTS AND TRADE

POBLACION MAHAYAG ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR

GRADE 11 MSAT STUDENTS PERFORMANCE


IN FACE-TO-FACE CLASSES VERSUS
ONLINE/BLENDED LEARNING

Submitted to:

Christine R. Dela Cruz

By:
Limutan, Gerah Liza B.

Peregrino, Jenny L.

Motios, Janice T.

Amdon, Glecyl T.

Fronda, Joshcelo

Dago-oc, Jonard

November 2022
INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic urges government officials to implement

extreme protocols such as lock-downs that lead to the closure of

establishments and schools to limit or control its transmission. As a result,

they stop the face-to-face classes and established the blended learning.

Face-to-face classes are the traditional form where there is a physical

interaction with the students and teachers. Blended/online learning is an

alternative form where students and teachers do not meet physically, and

learning commences is through self-directed learning.Their similarities mainly

focus on the learning's or the knowledge acquired, while the differences

emphasize their pros and cons towards the ways of how they executed them.

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

During the first half of 2020, the world was challenged by the corona

virus pandemic on an unprecedented scale. In response, many people

adopted the practice of social distancing, and schools suspended classes and

activities, which gives a big impact to the students as well as to the teachers.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not there are

differences in academic achievement between blended and face-to-face

learning. The risk of the Covid-19 pandemic leading to MCO (Movement

Control Order) last March 2020 made history on MCO 2.0, forcing online

teaching and learning sessions to continue in institutions of higher learning for

the new semester of 2021.

Online teaching and learning have their own issues such as an

unconducive student environment, student commitment to online learning,


insufficient internet facilities and devices, problems with effectiveness in

teaching and learning delivery, problems with lecturers' digital device skills as

well as a lack of cooperation between students and parents. These difficulties

might have an indirect impact on students' academic performance.According

to Kok (2021), the implementation of face-to-face teaching and learning, as

opposed to online, is the focus of student choice during the Covid-19

epidemic. As stated by Kok (2021), students' readiness for online learning is

moderate. Agustin et al. (2020) found out that students prefer face-to-face

learning over online learning, especially when there are some limits

encountered by students during the learning process while using the Whats

App application.

PRELIMINARY LITERATURE REVIEW

The purpose of this literature review is to provide the reader on the

information on the Academic Difference of Students from the blended learning

to the return of face-to-face classes.

Distance learning programs like blended can reach large audiences

at long distances and can increase enrollments (Farrior & Gallagher, 2000).

Investigators have explored many aspects of distance learning environments

and have researched many of the issues that should be considered when

using distance learning as a means of educational delivery. Crowley et al.

(1999) found that there were administration issues, technology issues, and

communication issues. Miller and King (2003) found that there were low

completion rates with distance education students, with as many as one-third


of the students dropping-out before completing the class. The high dropout

rate was attributed to “lack of feedback; feelings of isolation; frustrations with

the technology; anxiety; and confusion” (p. 286). Cuellar (2002) found that the

cons of on-line courses were increased time commitment, cost, and lack of

support for online learning and teaching. However, Cuellar also identified

many positive outcomes, such as, increased flexibility, no geographical

barriers, personalized learning, and collaboration and interactions among

students.

Based on the study of Fatih and Hafize (2008), the level of

achievement of students who take online classes is better when compared to

the face-to-face method. The findings of the study were obtained using the

Man-Whitney U Test in which achievement scores for both learning methods

were considered. A study by Suzanne and Heather (2014) also discovered

that online learning was more satisfying than face-to-face learning. Chalerm et

al (2020) conducted a similar study, which evaluated the test scores of

students who have taken online and offline tests. The findings indicated a

significant difference in scores between the two approaches, with the online

examination scoring significantly higher. They also proposed that more

studies need to be done to discover new effects and assessments to maintain

the level of knowledge in the long term.


STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study aims to determine the difference of performance of the

Grade 11 MSAT Student from the modular learning to face-to-face learning.

And it sought to answer the following query:

1. What is the academic performances of the grade 11 MSAT students

during the blended learning and after the return of face-to-face classes?

2. Is there a significant difference on the academic performances of the

students before and after the lock-downs?

3. How did the corona virus affects the performances of the grade 11

students?

METHODOLOGY

The researchers will provide a letter to be approved by our principal.

If the principal approves our study, we the researchers will automatically

conduct our survey to the Grade 11 MSAT students to gather the needed

data. After gathering data, the researchers will analyze the data for the

interpretation. And after analyzing the data, the researchers will discuss the

results.
TIMELINE

The table below is the proposed timeline of the study.

Title 3 days

Introduction 3 days

Preliminary Literature Review 1 week

Statement of the Problem/Objective 4 days

Methodology 1 week

Timeline 2 days

References 1 day

REFERENCES

https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/angeles-university-foundation/medical-

laboratory-science/face-to-face-classes-versus-modular-distance-learning-

compare-and-contrast/19107659

https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-021-02575-

https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/13273/a-comparison-of-student-

performance-in-online-and-face-to-face-learning-for-statistics-subject.pdf

You might also like