CHAPTER 5:

MALICIOUS SOFTWARES

Information Security
Nguyễn Đăng Quang
Fall 2021
 Identify types of malicious
software
Identify viruses vs worms

Malware Detection and

Prevention approaches
GOALS Understand the features of bots
& CC mechanism.
Understand the features of
APTs
Practice basic static & dynamic
malware analysis
 Programs exploiting system
vulnerabilities

MALICIOUS Known as malicious software or malware

 Program fragments that need a host program
SOFTWARE  e.g. viruses, and backdoors, browser plug-ins, extensions, scripts
 Independent self-contained programs
 e.g. worms, bots, APTs

Sophisticated threat to computer systems

 MALWARE TERMINOLOGY
Virus: attaches itself to a program
Worm: propagates copies of itself to other computers
Logic bomb: “explodes” when a condition occurs
Trojan horse: fakes/contains additional functionality
Backdoor (trapdoor): allows unauthorized access to functionality
Mobile code: moves unchanged to heterogeneous platforms
Auto-rooter Kit (virus generator): malicious code (virus) generators
Spammer and flooder programs: large volume of unwanted “pkts”
Keyloggers: capture keystrokes
Rootkit: sophisticated hacker tools to gain root-level access
Zombie: software on infected computers that launch attack on others (aka bot)
VIRUSES
Piece of software that infects programs
 Modifying them to include a copy of the virus to make it executes
secretly when host program is run.

Specific to operating system and hardware

 taking advantage of their details and weaknesses

A typical virus goes through phases of:

 dormant: idle
 propagation: copies itself to other programs
 triggering: activated to perform functions
 execution: the function is performed
VIRUS STRUCTURE
infection mechanism enables replication
Components: trigger: event that makes payload activate
payload: what it does, malicious or benign

Prepended/postpended/embedded

When infected program invoked, executes virus code

then original program code

Can block initial infection (difficult) or propagation (with

access controls)
 Memory-resident: infect
running program

Macro virus: embedded in

documents, run/spread when
opened

CATEGORIES
Boot sector virus: run/spread
when booted

Polymorphic virus: encrypted

part of the virus using a
randomly generated key.
BOOT SECTOR VIRUS
MACRO AND SCRIPTING VIRUSES
Became very common in mid-1990s since
 platform independent
 infect documents
 easily spread

Exploit macro capability of Office apps

 executable program embedded in office doc
 often a form of Basic

More recent releases include protection

Recognized by many anti-virus programs
 COMMON TECHNIQUE FOR SPREADING
First, a macro that contains virus is created then attached to a
Word Document.
When the infected document is opened, the macro (virus) executes.
The virus performs malicious activities. It can copy itself to the
global macro file so that whenever the user opens/creates a new
document, the global macro will be copied into the document, and
that's another way that the macro virus can spread.
 ROOTKIT
Memory resident virus.

It typically modifies some of the code and even data structures of the OS in
order to perform malicious activities.

Ex: Hide the malware file when listing directory with ls command or modify
output of ps command to hide the running of malware.
WORMS
Independent malicious program that does not require
host programs.
Use network connections to spread from one system to
the other.
A major advance malware since 1990s that develops
together with the internet.
Later evolved into botnets in around 2005.
MORRIS WORM
One of best known worms
Released by Robert Morris in 1988
 Affected 6,000 computers; cost $10-$100 M

Various attacks on UNIX systems

 cracking password file to use login/password to logon to other
systems
 exploiting a bug in the finger protocol
 exploiting a bug in sendmail

If succeed have remote shell access

 sent bootstrap program to copy worm over
MORE RECENT WORM ATTACKS
Code Red
 July 2001 exploiting MS IIS bug
 probes random IP address, does DDoS attack
 consumes significant net capacity when active
 360,000 servers in 14 hours
Code Red II variant includes backdoor: hacker controls the worm
SQL Slammer (exploited buffer-overflow vulnerability)
 early 2003, attacks MS SQL Server
 compact and very rapid spread
Mydoom (100 M infected messages in 36 hours)
 mass-mailing e-mail worm that appeared in 2004
 installed remote access backdoor in infected systems
 STATE OF WORM TECHNOLOGY

Multiplatform: not limited to Windows

Multi-exploit: Web servers, emails, file sharing …
Ultrafast spreading: do a scan to find vulnerable hosts
Polymorphic: each copy has a new code
Metamorphic: change appearance/behavior
Transport vehicles (e.g., for DDoS)
Zero-day exploit of unknown vulnerability (to achieve max surprise/distribution)
MALWARE PREVENTION &
DETECTION APPROACHES
 APPROACHES
Prevention: Limit contact to the untrusted outside world.

Detection: use a monitor to watch out signs of malware infection → main

countermeasure .

Removal: once malware infection is detected, it must be removed and apply

patches to the system.
GENERATIONS OF ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE

Simple
scanners

Full-
Features
AV Heuristic
Analysis software scanners

Activity
traps
MODERN MALWARE
MODERN MALWARE
Modern malware have advanced capabilities:
 robust command control infrastructures,
 the abilities to evade analysis and detection.

This section covers:

 Botnets & APTs,
 Basic malware analysis and detection techniques
The majority (early 2000) were designed for
experimenting or demonstrating some capabilities:
 Defacing web pages, large-scale DoS,
 How fast/large a worm/malware can spread → mostly
for fun & fame.

MALWARE IN THE PAST

 MODERN MALWARE
Take control of resources for profits and political gains.
Tend to be technically sophisticated:
 Utilized popular peer-to-peer protocols to set up communications,
 Utilized cloud computing to support malicious activities,
 Latest crypto algorithms to perform authentication & encryption to protect their own
communications from analysis.
BOTNET

The most prevalent modern-day malware.

Bot is a zombie.
Botnet is a network of bots controlled by an attacker to perform
coordinated malicious activities.
With a network of bots, the aggregated combination of power
can be very large.
Are now the key platform for most of the internet-based attacks
and frauds.
IDENTIFY BOTS & DEFINITIONS

a) Spamming 1. Used by botmasters to

fraudulently increase revenue
from advertisers.

b) Click fraud 2. Used to gather valuable

financial information.

3. Infected machines send out

c) Phishing
emails
DDOS USING BOTNETS
Attacker

Bots/Zombies

.....

SYN Flood, . . .

Victim
 AMPLIFIED DISTRIBUTED REFLECTIVE ATTACKS
Attacker

Botnet
Open
DNS request for txt records DNS
(spoof victim’s IP) server

Victim
Large DNS txt RR
1500+ bytes
BOTNET COMMAND AND CONTROL

Botnet is a network of compromised computers

that the Botmaster uses for malicious purposes.
The Botmaster needs to communicate with the
bots to command and control → C&C for short.
Without C&C, a botnet is not a network, but just
a collection of isolated infected machines
BOTNET C&C PROBLEM

Creating, Spreading is easy.

How can the botmaster know which computers
have been affected → how to contact and use
them?
 Hard-coded email?
 Hard-coded IP?
BOTNET C&C – NAIVE APPROACH

Have the victims contact the botmaster…

Problems:
 Botmaster’s address must be hardcoded in botcode → not stealthy
 The address will be easily recognized and be banned by the network
administrator
 Efficient and reliable:
Able to reach to a set of bots within a time
BOTNET C&C limit
DESIGN Stealthy:
CONSIDERATIONS Hard to detect (blended with regular traffic)
Resilient:
Hard to disable or block.
DNS BASED BOTNET C&C

Many botnets use DNS for C&C.

DNS is always allowed in a network.
The Botmaster releases malware where the
domain name of the C&C servers are coded.
Dynamic DNS is preferred by botmaster
because they allow the frequent changes of the
mapping between domain name and IP
address.
HOW TO DETECT & STOP BOTNET CC
QUIZ
Which of the following C&C schemes provide:
 Efficient/reliable communications
 Stealth communication (hard to detect)
 Resilient communication (hard to disrupt)

❑A Gmail account is used for C&C, email address is hardcoded in botcode.

❑P2P protocol is used for C&C, query string is hardcoded in botcode.
❑A news website has been set up for C&C, commands can be parsed from
news articles. The website and the parsing logic have to be hardcoded in the
botcode.
 APT tends to target specific organizations,
while botnets tend to have bots all over the
internet.
Advanced: special malware (a special
version of a common malware),
ADVANCED Persistent: Long-term presence, multi-step,
PERSISTENT “low and slow”,

THREAT (APT) Threat: Target at high-value organization

and information
APT LIFECYCLE
MALWARE ANALYSIS
 GOAL OF MALWARE ANALYSIS
Produces information about a malware → can be used for detection and
response to malware.
Steps:
1. Identify suspect binary files that might contains malicious code for full
analysis,
2. Analyze suspect files to develop host-based signatures and monitor
network traffic to develop network signatures,
3. Figure out exactly how the malware works
MALWARE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
Basic static:
Examining the executable file without viewing the actual
instructions to confirm malicious/not malicious
Basic dynamic:
Running the malware and observing its behavior on the
system in order to remove the infection
Advanced static:
Loading the executable into a disassembler and looking
at the program instructions in order to discover what the
program does
Advanced dynamic :
debugger to examine the internal state of a running
malicious executable
BASIC STATIC TECHNIQUES

1 2 3
Using antivirus Using hashes to Gleaning
tools to confirm identify malware. information from a
maliciousness. file’s string,
functions, and
headers.
ANTIVIRUS SCANNING
Antivirus tools rely mainly on a database of identifiable pieces of
known suspicious code (file signatures), as well as behavioral and
pattern-matching analysis (heuristics) to identify suspect files.
Rare malware often goes undetected by antivirus software because it’s
simply not in the database.
Because the various antivirus programs use different signatures and
heuristics, it’s useful to run several different antivirus programs against
the same piece of suspected malware.
VirusTotal (http://www.virustotal.com/) generates a report that
provides the total number of engines that marked the file as malicious,
the malware name, and, if available, additional information about the
malware.
HASING: A FINGERPRINT FOR
MALWARE
Hashing is a common method used to uniquely identify
malware.
The malicious software is run through a hashing program
that produces a unique hash that identifies that malware
(a sort of fingerprint).
The MD5 hash function is the one most commonly used for
malware analysis, though the Secure Hash Algorithm 1
(SHA-1) is also popular
Packing refers to the process of
compressing and encrypting part
of an executable program. ➔
that part becomes data, instead
of an instruction set.
https://bit.ly/2iFbcTH

PACKED AND OBFUSCATED MALWARE

http://www.virustotal.com
PEViewer
Upx Unpacker
Dependency Walker
PE Explorer

TOOLS
PORTABLE EXECUTABLE (PE) FILE FORMAT
The PE file format is a data structure that contains the information
necessary for the Windows OS loader to manage the wrapped
executable code.
Nearly every file with executable code that is loaded by Windows is
in the PE file format.
PE files begin with a header that includes information about the code,
the type of application, required library functions, and space
requirements. The information in the PE header is of great value to the
malware analyst
DEPENDENCY
WALKER
LINKED LIBRARIES AND FUNCTIONS
Imports are functions used by one program that are actually stored in
a different program, such as library codes that contain functionality
common to many programs.
Libraries code can be connected to the main executable by static or
dynamic linking.
Knowing how the library code is linked is critical to understanding of
the malware because the information we can find in the PE file header
depends on how the library code has been linked.
Dependency walker (http://dependencywalker.com) can be used to
list dynamically linked functions in an executable
PROGRAM’S DLLS
PE FILE HEADERS AND SECTIONS

sections description
.text code section
.rdata contains the import and export information, which is the same
information available from both Dependency Walker & PEViewer

.data Program’s global data

.rsrc the resources used by the executable that are not considered part
of the executable, such as icons, images, menus, and strings.
BASIC STATIC TECHNIQUE
DEMO
BASIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Dynamic analysis is any examination performed after
executing malware.
Dynamic analysis techniques are the second step in the
malware analysis process.
Dynamic analysis is typically performed after basic static
analysis has reached a dead end.
It can involve monitoring malware as it runs or examining
the system after the malware has executed.
BASIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
TECHNIQUES
Running malware in VMware.
Monitoring with process monitor (procmon)
Faking a network
 ApateDNS: ApateDNS spoofs DNS responses to a user-specified IP
address by listening on UDP port 53 on the local machine.
 Netcat: Network monitoring
 Wireshark: Network sniffing
 INetSim: Linux-based software suite for simulating common Internet
services