Scribd
Upload
141 views1 page

RUBRIC For OJT Practicum Final Report New

This document outlines a rubric for evaluating OJT/Practicum final written reports with 6 performance indicators: 1) attainment of student outcomes, 2) alignment of learning activities to field of specialization, 3) reflection of learning and experiences, 4) style and mechanics, 5) format of the report, and 6) timeliness. Reports are scored from 1 to 4 in each category and an overall percentage rating is calculated based on the total score. The rubric provides descriptors to differentiate unsatisfactory, developing, satisfactory, and very satisfactory performance in each of the six evaluated areas.

Uploaded by

Cristine Arpon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
141 views1 page

RUBRIC For OJT Practicum Final Report New

This document outlines a rubric for evaluating OJT/Practicum final written reports with 6 performance indicators: 1) attainment of student outcomes, 2) alignment of learning activities to field of specialization, 3) reflection of learning and experiences, 4) style and mechanics, 5) format of the report, and 6) timeliness. Reports are scored from 1 to 4 in each category and an overall percentage rating is calculated based on the total score. The rubric provides descriptors to differentiate unsatisfactory, developing, satisfactory, and very satisfactory performance in each of the six evaluated areas.

Uploaded by

Cristine Arpon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

RUBRIC FOR OJT/Practicum Final Written Report

Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Very Satisfactory


Performance Indicators Score
1 2 3 4

1. Attainment of Unable to accomplish any Accomplishes at most two of the Accomplishes three of the Accomplishes at least four of the
course’s Student course’s Student Outcome in course’s Student Outcomes in course’s Student Outcomes in the course’s Student Outcomes in
Outcome the learning activities. the learning activities. learning activities. the learning activities.

2. Alignment of
learning activities Activities are completely Some of the activities and tasks Most activities and tasks are All activities and tasks given are
to the field of unrelated and irrelevant. are related and relevant. related and relevant. related and relevant.
specialization
Discussion is insubstantial. Conveys relevance but not Solid understanding is
Descriptions are organized but not
3. Reflection of Relevance of the learning is thoroughly discussed and effectively communicated.
completely concise. Adequate
learning and unclear. Lacks attention to analyzed. Some explanations Descriptions are well-organized.
understanding is expressed.
experiences clear communication and lack depth, unorganized and/or Relevance to career
Relevance to goals is analyzed.
organization. unclear. goals/learning is analyzed.
Serious errors are present in
Frequent errors present in Some errors present in sentence Sentence structure is effective.
sentence structure. Extremely
4. Style and sentence structure. Several structure; Occasional punctuation, Report is free from punctuation,
numerous errors present in
Mechanics errors present in punctuation, spelling and/or capitalization spelling and capitalization
spelling, capitalization and
spelling and/or capitalization. errors are present. errors.
punctuation.
5. Format of the Unable to follow the prescribed Several errors are present in the Minor errors in the format of the Report follows the prescribed
report format. report. report are present. format and is error-free.

Report is submitted at least Report is submitted within one Report is submitted ahead of the
6. Timeliness Report is submitted on time.
one week after the deadline. week after the deadline. deadline.

Total Score

Mean Score = (Total Score / 6)

Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100%

Evaluated by:

AR. ADRIAN R. TOISA


OJT Faculty-In-Charge, Arch. Dept.

You might also like