Laboratory Report Experiment 4 - Group 7
Laboratory Report Experiment 4 - Group 7
College of Engineering
Laboratory Experiment
MEASUREMENT OF VISCOSITY
Experiment 4
Submitted by:
Group 7
Submitted to:
Instructor
24 March 2021
1
I. ABSTRACT
The viscosity of a fluid is a measurement of its resistance to flow. A
highly viscous fluid has high resistances and moves more slowly compared
to low-viscosity fluid. This experiment aims to familiarize the instruments
that are used in measuring the viscosity and to determine the relationship
between the time of efflux and viscosity of the given compound. In this
experiment, we measured the viscosity of distilled water as well as three other
organic compounds; ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, and benzene using the
Ostwald Viscometer. Distilled water after three trials at constant temperature
and density had a consistent 0.894 cP viscosity whereas the other organic
compounds’ viscosity at constant temperature and their respective densities
are as follows: 1.087507 cP, 0.920255 cP, and 1.268057 cP. These organic
compounds are highly viscous therefore flows slowly compared to distilled
water. The flow rate is inversely proportional to the time of efflux. As for the
second part of the experiment, we measured the viscosity of catsup and
condensed milk but this time using a different simulation called the Portable
Viscosity tester (Vt-03). After three trials and at constant temperatures, catsup
had the highest average viscosity of 0.065 cP and condensed milk’s highest
average viscosity is 0.118 cP both recorded at the lower scale rotor 03 of the
equipment. Condensed milk’s viscosity is higher than catsup therefore it has
a higher resistance and takes longer to flow. Since there are no theoretical
values to be compared to, no percentage errors were recorded in this
experiment. When manufacturers collect data on a material's viscosity, they
can predict how the material will behave in the real world and that is the
importance of knowing the viscosities of certain fluids.
Keywords: Ostwald Viscometer, Portable Viscotester (Vt-03), time of
efflux, Viscosity, flow rate
2
II. INTRODUCTION
FORMULA
Poiseuille Law:
𝜋𝑃𝑟 2 𝑡 Where:
𝜇=
8𝐿𝑉
P = pressure head
𝜋𝑃𝑟 2 𝑡 r = radius of the capillary tube
𝜇𝑢𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛 ( 8𝐿𝑉 ) 𝑢𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛
= L = length of the capillary tube
𝜇𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝜋𝑃𝑟 2 𝑡
( 8𝐿𝑉 ) 𝑟𝑒𝑓
V = volume of the fluid
T = time of efflux
Density:
𝐶1 Where:
𝜌=
𝑇
𝐶2(1 + (1 − 𝐶3)𝐶4 ) 𝝆 = Density
C1, C2, C3, C4 = Values
retrieved from Perry’s ChE
Handbook
T = Temperature
Viscosity: Where:
(𝜌𝑡)𝑢𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝝁 = Viscosity
𝜇= 𝑥 𝜇𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
(𝜌𝑡)𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
𝝆 = Density of unknown
substance
t = time of efflux
6
IV. PROCEDURE
In this experiment, the researchers have identified the effects of
temperature in the viscosity of liquids, specifically of Distilled Water, Milk
and different organic compounds including Benzene, methanol, and ethanol.
This experiment quantified different factors that are in play with regards to the
relationship of viscosity and time of efflux. Here are the following steps that
are undertaken to complete this experiment:
A. Collection of Pre-fabricated Result. In this part of the experiment, the
researcher will define the steps executed to collect the pre-fabricated data.
Here are the following steps that are executed to collect and analyze the
data:
a. Measurement of Viscosity using Ostwald Viscometer. In this
simulation, the instructor has collected data regarding the time of efflux
of each sample at constant temperature. This data will in turn allow us
to determine the viscosity of the given sample in the u-tube capillary.
Here are the following steps executed to collect significant data:
1. Open the simulation.
2. Select a liquid to be examined.
3. Click the fill liquid button on the middle right corner contained
under the variable section
4. Click the start button to initiate the experiment.
5. After step 4, immediately start the time on the lower left side of
the simulation to measure the time of efflux
6. Repeat steps 1 – 4 using a difference sample to gather the other
results.
b. Measurement of Viscosity using Portable Viscotester (Vt-03).
Succeeding from the previous part, the instructor will determine the
density of liquids at a particular temperature. Here are the following
steps that are executed to collect and analyze the data:
7
1. Insert the threaded end of the rotor into the connector hole
2. Turn the rotor in counter-clockwise until it is completely mounted.
3. Fill the cup with starch solution up to the dip mark as indicated in
each motor.
4. Level the instrument as indicated in the level indicator of the
instrument.
5. Release the clamp and turn on the power.
6. Read the viscosity according to the rotor used.
7. Repeat the procedure using the condensed milk and ketchup.
B. Data Analysis. For this part, the researcher will use the initial
experimental results from part i and ii to be graphed, comparing the
characteristics of each sample. From the obtained value, we can
determine the relationship of viscosity and time of efflux from varying
liquid samples. But due to the scarcity of data provided by the
simulation, there will be no analysis of error performed in the analysis
of data.
8
In Figure 1, the viscosity values were plotted against their respective time
of effluxes. It can be deduced that the higher the viscosity, the longer time of efflux.
Based on the graph, the liquids ranked from the least to greatest viscosity would be
distilled water, Methyl Alcohol, Ethyl Alcohol then Benzene with values of 0.894
cP, 0.920255 cP, 1.086507 cP, and 1.268057 cP, respectively. In the same order,
their efflux timings were 0.420 min, 0.549 min, 0.651 min, and 0.684 min.
9
discussing the behavior of the liquids, a higher viscosity leads to more resistance to
flow and a slower laminar flow rate based on observations from the simulation. The
slow flow rate of the liquid caused more time to elapse as it was being drained down
the tube from the first position to the second. This means that the lower the velocity
the liquid was travelling at, the longer the time it took for efflux. The flow rate and
the time of efflux have an inversely proportional relationship to each other.
highest at 0.065 cP. The second highest viscosity was at rotor number 3 with 0.027
cP and lastly was 0.024 cP at rotor number 4. Rotor number 5 is used preferably for
higher viscosities while rotor number 3 is used for lower viscosities. These are part
of the apparatus and do not really have a relationship with the substance’s viscosity.
The same procedure was done for Condensed Milk’s viscosity in the
Portable Viscosity tester (Vt-03). This time the constant temperature used was 34
C to gather the data as shown in Figure 3. Three trials were also conducted and its
computed averages were plotted in a bar graph with the same rotor numbers 5, 4
and 3. At rotor number 5, the Condensed Milk’s viscosity was highest at 0.0118 cP.
The second highest viscosity was at rotor number 4 with 0.117 cP and lastly was
0.103 cP at rotor number 3. Comparing the viscosities of Condensed Milk and
Catsup, the Condensed Milk has a higher viscosity in all three rotor numbers.
11
The simulations that were used for this experiment functions in only one
way and that is by finding the viscosities of the given fluids. There were no
theoretical values recorded for the given liquids therefore only experimental
values were obtained, which resulted in no percentage errors. The viscosities
noted for each sample seem accurate upon observing their respective time of
effluxes. Thus, the simulations used were accurate and precise. It is
recommended for future similar experiments to have more trials to be recorded
to ensure a much more accurate and precise results and deeper discussions, and
for the given temperature values to be different in each trial in order to emphasize
the relationship between viscosity and temperature.
12
III. BIBLIOGRAPHY
IV. NOMENCLATURE
In this experiment, the researchers have determined the relationship
between several factors that affect the viscosity of a sample. Analyzing this
experiment, we have utilized several formulas which were used to determine the
unknown. These equations consist of the following variables and terminology
that are presented and defined in this table below:
Density g/mL
𝝆
Pressure Pa
P
o
Temperature C
T
Viscosity of reference cP
μreference
14
APPENDICES
15
APPENDIX A.1
RAW DATA
16
DISTILLED
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Average
WATER
Temperature
30 30 30 30
(oC)
Density (g/mL) 0.996565 0.996565 0.996565 0.996565
COMPOUND
Temperature (oC) 30 30 30
CATSUP
Temperature (oC) 35 35 35 35
CONDENSED MILK
Temperature (oC) 34 34 34 34
APPENDIX A.2
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
DENSITY
METHANOL Solution:
T = 30°C + 273.15 = 303.15 K
MWMetOH = 32.042 g/mol
C1 = 2.3267
C2 = 0.27073
C3 = 512.5
C4 = 0.24713
BENZENE Solution:
VISCOSITY
[0.781392][0.651]
𝝁𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒚𝒍 𝒂𝒍𝒄𝒐𝒉𝒐𝒍 = × [0.894] = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖𝟔𝟓𝟎𝟕 𝒄𝑷
[0.996565][0.420]
[0.784790][0.549]
𝝁𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒍 = × [0.894] = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓𝟓 𝒄𝑷
[0.996565][0.420]
[0.867961][0.684]
𝝁𝒃𝒆𝒏𝒛𝒆𝒏𝒆 = × [0.894] = 𝟏. 𝟐𝟔𝟖𝟎𝟓𝟕 𝒄𝑷
[0.996565][0.420]
Temperature MW
COMPOUND C1 C2 C3 C4
(K) (g/mol)
Methyl
303.15 32.042 2.3267 0.27073 512.5 0.24713
Alcohol
Density Density
COMPOUND Exponent Denominator
(mol/dm3) (g/cm3)
Ethyl Alcohol 1.813399 0.096028 16.961705 0.781392
Methyl
1.801513 0.094996 24.492527 0.784790
Alcohol
Benzene 1.802442 0.092326 11.111754 0.867961
21
APPENDIX A.3
SIMILARITY REPORT
22