Module 53. Process Control

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 101

UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

National Guard
Black Belt Training

Module 53

Process Control

UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

CPI Roadmap
p – Control
8-STEP PROCESS
6. See
1.Validate
1 Validate 2. Identify 3. Set 4. Determine 5. Develop 7. Confirm 8. Standardize
Counter-
the Performance Improvement Root Counter- Results Successful
Measures
Problem Gaps Targets Cause Measures & Process Processes
Through

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control

TOOLS
ACTIVITIES
•KPIs/Metrics
• Implement Mistake Proofing
•Control Charts & SPC
• Develop SOP’s, Training Plan, Process
•Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s)
Controls
•Training Plan
• Implement Solution
•Communication Plan
• Establish Ongoing Process Measurements
•Implementation Plan
• Identify Project Replication Opportunities
•Process Control / Response Plans
• Estimate Final Financial/Operational Benefits
•Visual Process Control Tools
• Transition Project to Process Owner
•Project Replication
• Develop Audit/Response Plan
•Project Commissioning
• Create Final Storyboard
•Storyboards
• Complete Control Tollgate
•Team Feedback Session

2
Note: Activities and tools vary by project. Lists provided here are not necessarily all-inclusive. UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Learning Objectives
‹ Apply the concepts of Control Plans to process
i
improvement t projects
j t
‹ Apply the concepts of Standard Operating Procedures
to process improvement processes

3
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Phase Tasks


After developing and implementing a pilot:
1. Validate the measurement system for the
KPOV(s) and critical KPIV(s)
We discussed these tools earlier
2. Implement the improvements
3. Create a process control system to make sure that the
improved process stays in control
‹ D
Documentt ththe appropriate
i t procedures
d ffor monitoring
it i th the process,
including how to react if it goes out of control
‹ Development of the process control system really gets started early
in yyour p
project
j but is implemented
p in the Control Phase

4. Process Documentation and Standard Operating Procedures


5. Project closure and commissioning
We will discuss this tool later

4
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Measurement System Analysis


‹ When collecting data as part of our control system,
we mustt verify
if th
thatt th
there iis nott excessive
i
measurement system variation present.
‹ This
h really
ll should
h ld have
h been
b done
d prior to conducting
d
significant analysis but now is your absolute last
chance
‹ To validate the measurement system, you should use
the same process that you learned in the MSA
modules in Measure

5
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Determine Process Capability


‹ Process capability is the measure for how a process is
performing
‹ Verify that our process is doing better, we need to re-
calculate that number now
‹ Recalculate during the pilot phase to confirm the
capability has improved, then calculate it again after
the improvement has gone live in the workplace
„ The second "real-world" calculation should only happen
after enough time has passed to allow sufficient
sampling and the process is in control
„ For the purpose of this training, that means after you
have completed the Control tasks
6
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Improvement Confirmation
‹ Confirmation in Six Sigma means statistics that will
b k up your decisions.
back d i i
‹ We will be using calculations that you have already
l
learned
d in process capability
b l and d hypothesis
h h testing
‹ This means comparing the mean and standard
deviation of the original data collected with data
collected after the improvement

7
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

National Guard
Black Belt Training

Control Plans

UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Cultural Issues and Control


‹ If data has been used to develop the solution, if it fails, it is
usually not due to technical issues
‹ Acceptance by the people in the process (cultural issues) often
determines success or failure
‹ Force Field Analysis helps to identify and mitigate cultural risk
‹ Driving forces are things that can or will drive the organization
to implement the change
‹ Restraining forces are things that can or will drive the
organization to reject the change
‹ Key: Strengthen driving forces and/or weaken restraining
forces

9
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Exercise: Cultural Issues


‹ For your training project, complete a Force Field analysis
for the implementation and control plans

__________________ Project Implementation and Control

Driving Forces Restraining Forces

10
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Maintaining the Improvement


‹ There are the three approaches you can use to
maintain
i t i your process improvement.
i t
‹ They are not sequential, however there is somewhat
off a h
hierarchy:
h
„ Risk Management
„ Mi t k Proofing
Mistake P fi
z Both should be considered before or in tandem with a control
charting strategy, because they are strategies for avoiding
potential problems altogether
„ Control Charts can only monitor for potential
problems All th
three
ee app
approaches
oaches must
m st have
ha e
Control Plans to sustain the gains
11
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Mistake Proofing
‹ The best approach to process control is Mistake
Proofing Mistake Proofing is a method for avoiding
Proofing.
errors in a process
‹ The simplest definition of "Mistake
Mistake Proofing”
Proofing is that it
is a technique for eliminating errors by making it
impossible to make mistakes in the process
‹ Unfortunately, mistake proofing is not always possible
or economically practical, therefore you must develop
a plan with on-going monitoring

12
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Charts
‹ Control charts are essentially a feedback system
‹ Generating control charts requires on-going data
collection on a process to monitor how it performed
b f
before and
d after
f the
h improvements

13
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Review of Control Charts


‹ Focuses attention on measuring
g and tracking
g
process variation over time
‹ Distinguishes
g between special
p and common
causes of variation
‹ Used as a tool for p
process control ((can monitor
inputs and outputs over time)
‹ Tracks pprocess improvements
p in q
quality,
y, cost
and/or throughput
‹ Establishes a normative and uniform language
g g
for comparing performance among processes
14
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Steps to Create Control Charts


‹ Determine where to use control charts
‹ Determine the control chart type, and then the sampling
method
‹ Collect data
‹ Calculate statistics
‹ Track data, remove causes for out-of-control points, and
recalculate statistics. Repeat until stable.
‹ Develop action plan for out-of-control conditions
‹ Run the process over time

15
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Creating Control Charts

ATTRIBUTE type CONTINUOUS


off data

type of
subgroup
attribute
size
data
DEFECTS DEFECTIVES

subgroup size 1 2-7 8+

sample sample
size size
I – MR X–R X–S
Chart Chart Chart
CONSTANT VARIABLE CONSTANT VARIABLE
Individuals Mean & Mean &
& Moving Range Std. Dev.
Range

NP
C Chart U Chart P Chart
Chart

Number of Incidences Number of Proportion Choose Appropriate


Incidences per Unit Defectives Defective Control Chart

16
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Input vs. Output Measures


X Y

17
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Chart Advantages

‹ Systematic and efficient method for turning data into


actionable information
‹ Lets p
people
p make decisions from FACTS
‹ Highlights special cause impacts to a process
‹ Provides
o des warning
a go
of deg
degradation
ada o bebefore
o e making
a g dedefect
ec
products / services
‹ Establishes controls for continuous improvement and
shows
h evidence
id off iimprovements
t
‹ Involves everyone and builds worker knowledge of the
process

18
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Show Control Chart Stages


g

P Chart of Bad by Stage


Before After
0.6 1

0.5

0.4

Proportion
1
0.3 UCL=0.3045

0.2
_
0.1 P=0.1069

0.0 LCL=0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17
Sample
Tests performed with unequal sample sizes

Select stages under Options button in Minitab


19
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Watch for Patterns


OUTLIERS
‹ Wrong process settings, error in measurement, subgrouping or
plotting, incomplete operation, machine and tool breakdowns,
power surge.

SHIFTS
‹ Is the change sudden or gradual?
‹ Introduction of a new material, machine, operator, inspector or test
set, new process controls, maintenance, process changes, change
in proportion of materials from different sources.

TRENDS
‹ Tool or fixture wear, deterioration of materials, aging, changes in
maintenance or calibration,
calibration environmental factors
factors, human factors,
factors
production schedules, gradual changes in materials or process,
accumulation of waste products, machine warm-up.
20
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Watch for Patterns


CYCLES
‹ Does the time period of the cycle suggest a cause?
‹ Environmental factors, worn locations on tools or fixtures, human factors, gage
changes, voltage fluctuations, shift changes, systematic rotation of equipment or
materials, merging of subassemblies or processes.

STRATIFICATION
‹ Could each subgroup be a mixture of data from more than one source?
‹ Non-random
N d sampling,
li miscalculation,
i l l ti iincorrectt chart
h t ttype, non-rational
ti l
subgrouping, reduction in process variability, changes in inspection process.

MIXTURES
‹ Could subgroups be coming from two sources alternately?
‹ Two or more different materials, operators, designs, or testers mixed in the
process, over adjustments of the process, poor sampling procedures, control of
two or more processes on the same chart

21
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Implementation Notes
‹ Use Control Charts where it will be of benefit
‹ Design the improvements and monitor their impact
over time
‹ Train everyone on how to read control charts
‹ Create a control plan to identify “triggers”
triggers to watch
and “responses” to implement

Beware: Graphs can be misleading

22
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

What Is a Control Plan?


‹ Control plans provide a written summary description of the
systems
t used
d iin minimizing
i i i i process and
d service
i variation
i ti
‹ Control plans do not replace information contained in
detailed instructions
‹ In a grand sense the control plan describes the actions that
are required at each phase of the process including
receiving, in-process, outgoing, and periodic requirements
to assure that all process outputs will be in a state of
control
‹ Ultimately, the control plan is a living document reflecting
current methods of control and measurement systems used

23
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Minimum Requirements


1. Identify the process that is being controlled
2. Identify measures (numbers) to be monitored
3. Identify “trigger
trigger point”
point values for each measure where
action should be taken
4 Identify action to be taken when a “trigger
4. trigger point”
point is
reached
5 Identify who is responsible for taking action when a
5.
“trigger point” is reached

24
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Elements of Process Control Plans


‹ Holds the performance gains made
‹ Assists in highlighting opportunities for further
improvement activities
‹ Is a living document
„ Adjusted as conditions change and further
improvements made
„ Has formal provision for periodic review
‹ Is interesting and easy to understand – use pictures
and colors

25
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Why Is a Process Control Plan Necessary?


‹ Processes have a tendency to degrade over time
‹ Also, at this stage, the process is generally moving
beyond the hands of the CPI team
‹ Those who are responsible for continuing the process
need a clear understanding of how to implement it
consistently and steps to take if it gets out of control
‹ The improved process needs to be communicated to
all involved p
parties through
g documentation and
training
‹A data collection plan is also necessary to test the
i
improvedd process andd confirm
fi that
h the
h solutions
l i are
indeed having positive impact 26
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Existing Control Documentation


‹ Many processes already have in place what are called
"
"quality
lit plans"
l " to
t ensure each
h service
i characteristic
h t i ti or sub-
b
process stays in conformance with their overall process
‹ You should take into consideration any existing quality
plans as part of establishing a process control system for
your project
„ The existing plan may include process procedures and
tolerances, as well as items to be monitored for control and
response
p plans
p in the event of a process
p breakdown. These
can inform your own control plan
„ Your improved sub-process may have an impact on the
quality plan,
plan so you need to include changes to it as part of
your documentation
27
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Process Control Plan Header


‹ Control Plan Number (for Doc. Control)
‹ Date revised and effective date
‹ Contact person who “owns”
owns Control Plan
‹ Team personnel that created Plan
‹ Service or Product numbers/processes that Plan
applies to
‹ Other identification notes

28
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Process Control Plan Body – 1


‹ Following the layout of the new Process Map, list the
process operation
ti steps
t and
d ffor each:
h
„ Number of the step
„ N
Name off step
t ((operation
ti or action
ti tto b
be ddone))
„ Tools and/or guides used to assist operation
„ Characteristics of the process step (KPIVs)
„ Characteristics of the step outcomes (KPOVs)
„ Any special notation for a characteristic ?
(Safety or environmental issue?)

29
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Process Control Plan Body – 2


‹ Proposed specs for each KPIV and KPOV including the
t l
tolerances
‹ Evaluation or measurement technique - how to monitor the
variable meets the specification or tolerance
„ For each characteristic called out
„ Attribute or Variable
„ How measurement will be done (tool and SOP)
„ Sample size and frequency
‹ Control/monitoring method
‹ Reaction plan for when KPIV/KPOV goes
p g out of spec
p

30
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Strategy


‹ The intent of an effective control plan strategy is to:
„ Operate our processes consistently on target with
minimum variation
„ Minimize process tampering (over-adjustment)
(over adjustment)
„ Assure that the process improvements that have been
identified and implemented
p become institutionalized
„ Provide for adequate training in all procedures
„ Include required maintenance schedules

Revise Perodically

31
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Documenting the Control Plan


Process Current
Cpk /Date Measurement %R&R Sample Sample
Process Process Step Input Output Specification (LSL, Control Reaction Plan
(Sample Size) System %P/T Size Frequency
USL, Target) Method

‹ For Key Process Input and Key Process Output variables, the measurement
system
y and measurement system
y capability
p y should be identified
‹ Targets and specification limits for Key Process Input Variables and Key Process
Output variables are recorded
‹ For inputs and outputs, the process capability should be calculated
‹ The specifics of the sampling plan with associated reaction plan for out-of-spec
conditions should be listed
‹ This document is an extension of the Current Controls column of the FMEA

32
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

FMEA In Control Planning


‹ The FMEA should be a primary source for the identification of key
variables to control and for an initial evaluation of current control plans

S O
Key Process
Process Step Potential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects E Potential Causes C Current Controls
Input
V C

Process Current
Cpk /Date Measurement %R&R Sample Sample
Process Process Step Input Output Specification (LSL, Control Reaction Plan
(Sample Size) System %P/T Size Frequency
USL, Target) Method

33
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Development


‹ Continuous variables:
determine optimal operating
window (specifications)
‹ Discrete/attribute
/ variables:
Process
Cpk /D
Process Process Step Input Output Specification (LSL,
(Sample
US T
USL, Target))

determine optimal setting,


procedure, material, etc.
‹ Uncontrollable
U t ll bl noise
i
variables: determine
acceptable operating windows
f compensating
for i variables
i bl

34
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Development Control Methods


‹ For Controllable
Variables: „ Statistical
St ti ti l P
Process C
Control
t l
„ Inspection and Test Methods z Choice of control chart(s)
and sampling plan
„ Standard Operating Procedures
z Procedures
P o ed e fo for identif
identifying
ing
(“SOPs”), Checklists
and responding to out-of-
„ Mistake-proofing systems and control points and
devices undesirable trends
z Color tags z Procedures for preventing
z Single use devices recurrence of special causes
„ Automated process control
p
on Cpk /Da te Me a sure m e nt %R&R Curre nt Control Sa m
L, (Sa m ple Size ) Te chnique P/T Me thod S

35
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Development Control Methods


‹ For Noise (Uncontrollable
Input) Variables:
„ Compensate with changes to
KPIVs (based on known
relationships not tweaking or
relationships,
opinion!)
„ Define shutdown conditions
on Cpk /Date Measurement %R&R Current Control Sam

„ Use alternative quality control L, (Sample Size) Technique P/T Method S

procedures (inspection, sorting,


rework, etc.)

36
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Methods Takeaways


‹ Changes in the process require changes to the control
method
th d
‹ Control methods identify person responsible for
controll off each
h criticall variable
bl and
d details
d l about
b how
h
to react to out-of-control conditions (see next slide)
‹ Control methods include a training plan and process
auditing system
‹ Complicated methods can be referenced by document
number and location

37
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Reaction Plans
Holding the Gain
‹ Monitor and respond to problems
‹ Manage the process day-to-day
day to day
‹ Practice continuous improvement

When
h you improve a process and d
hold the gain, it ensures your efforts
have not been in vain

38
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Reaction Plan and Procedures


‹ Actions should be the
responsibility of people
closest to the process
‹ The reaction plan can
simply refer to an SOP and
identify the person R
Current
Sample Sample

responsible for the reaction


Control Reaction Plan
Size q y
Frequency
M th d
Method

procedure
‹ In all cases, suspect or
nonconforming service must
be clearly identified and
quarantined
‹ Can be built from the FMEA
39
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Building a Reaction Plan


1.Examine Each Key Step in the Process
„ Entire SIPOC

2.Apply Preventive Planning


„ What could go wrong?
„ How would we respond – contingency?
„ Who would be responsible?

3.Set “Trigger” Measures


„ What
Wh would ld warrant response??

4.Document the Plan


„ Key ingredient for Process Management
40
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Examples of Reaction Plans


‹ Adjust the machine and recheck
‹ Separate service and quarantine
‹ Return to supplier / previous process step
‹ Notify supervisor
‹ Resource shift

NOTE: Area personnel will typically have a list of items to


check when a characteristic wanders out of control

41
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Reaction Types
‹ Compensate
„ This type of control involves making a process adjustment to bring the
variable back into control without identifying or correcting the factor
aches

which caused the situation


oved

‹ Correct
Approa
Impro

„ In this type of control action, the cause of the variation is identified and
corrected temporarily. The problem may reappear soon.

‹ Prevent
A

„ In this type of action, the cause of the variation is identified and


permanently corrected. The cause will not happen again or at least will
not occur as often.

Typically, unsuccessful control programs utilize only compensating


actions. Focus control plan response on preventative action. Examples
i l d roott cause analysis,
include l i personnell training,
t i i preventative
t ti
maintenance, controller tuning and replacing defective equipment.
42
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

How to Take Preventative Action


‹ When an undocumented out-of-control condition occurs, a cross-
functional team consisting mainly of area personnel
personnel, process
engineers, and supervisors identify the variable to be controlled
and follow these steps:
1. Prepare or update a process flow diagram of the system
2. A cause/effect (fishbone) diagram is prepared illustrating
possible causes of variation in the process
„ Four basic areas to center on are: manpower, materials, methods, and
machinery
3. The team selects the most likely causes from the list
3
4. Starting with the most likely causes, root causes of the
variation are identified. Ask “WHY?” five times!

Find root causes, not likely causes!


43
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

How to Take Preventative Action (Cont.)


5. Prepare a Reaction Plan for each out-of-control condition
„ Causes
C are placed
l d in
i the
th order
d that
th t they
th should
h ld be
b checked,
h k d the
th mostt likely
lik l
or easiest to check first
„ The team determines compensating actions to take should no cause be
identified

6. The Reaction Plan is reviewed by the team and the process


experts for modifications. The team determines how the plan
will be documented and how to train the work force
7. Corrective action (permanent ones!) assignments are made and
followed up to prevent recurrence!
8. Define a plan to collect data on how often the reaction plan is
used and how well it works. Review results q quarterlyy

44
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Trouble Shooting
‹ A control plan is a logical, systematic approach for
fi di and
finding d correcting
ti roott causes off out-of-control
t f t l
conditions, and will be a valuable tool for process
improvement
‹ A key advantage of the reaction plan form is its use
as a troubleshooting guide for area personnel
„ A systematic guide of what to look for during upset
conditions is valuable on its own

45
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

R&R Leave Program Example


PROJECT NAME DIVISION DIVISION CHIEF DATE
USCENTCOM R&R Leave Program Human Relations Readiness Division, HRPD COL Donna Alberto 3/31/2007
BRANCH CHIEF PROCESS OWNERS RESPONSIBLE CONTROL MANAGER
LTC Frazlier Pope Army G-1, USCENTCOM, CFLCC, TRANSCOM Stewart Goesch MONTHLY REPORT

Applicable Control Charts and Metrics


Control
Responsible Upper Lower
Action Control Action Target
Individual Freq. Process Step Control Control Current Reaction Plan
Number Value
Limit Limit
LTC Rivera; LTC Project PAX 90,
100% If pax projection accuracy drops below 85%, CFLCC will
1 PAX Projections Coperhaven; LTC Daily/Monthly 60, 30, 6 days and
Accurate
100% 85% 88% automatically reduce PAX estimates by 5-10%
5 10%
K
Knott 48 h
hrs out
Mike Phillips If pax seat fill accuracy drops below 85% (e.g. over
(with Dave Order 100% 15% excess seats continuously ordered), G-1 will
2 Aircraft/Seat Orders
Hamilton & LTC
Daily/Monthly
Seats/Aircraft Accurate
100% 85% 92% automatically reduce PAX seat estimates forwarded to
Knott) AMC by 5-10%
If Fill Rate drops below 65%, recommend switch to 2-1-
3 Fill Rate Stewart Goesch Daily/Monthly Monitor Fill Rate 80% 75% 65% 64% 2-1 for 17-30 days and then monitor for improvements
If Number of Unfilled Seats reaches 3811, recommend
Monitor Unfilled
4 Unfilled Seats Stewart Goesch Daily/Monthly
Seats
2,500/Mo 4,000/Mo 0 3,811 switch to 2-1-2-1 for 17-30 days and then monitor for
improvements
If Avg Cost Per PAX exceeds $2,500 and we are
ordering 2 aircraft, switch to 2-1-2-1 for 17-30 days and
Monitor Cost Per then monitor for improvements; if we are ordering one
5 Average Cost Per PAX Stewart Goesch Daily/Monthly
PAX
$1,894 $2,500 $1,515 $2,609 aircraft, and the total numbers are less than 100,
attempt to sell back mission and utilize commercial air
$1554/PAX
If holdover count exceeds 0, first utilize extra seats on
Mike Phillips (with 50 aircraft $178/PAX, then consider utilization up to 100
6 Holdovers Dave Hamilton & LTC Daily/Monthly Monitor Holdovers 0
(24-48 hrs)
0 55 seats commercial, then holdover for 24 hrs, and fly out
Knott)
FIFO on very next mission
Mike Phillips (with Order Second If substained pax average projected over 370 PAX /day,
7 Second Aircraft Orders Dave Hamilton & LTC Daily/Monthly
Aircraft
355 370 330 222 g second aircraft
consider ordering
Knott)
Mike Phillips (with Attempt sell back-any msn with less than 50 PAX
8 Aircraft Sell Backs Dave Hamilton & LTC Daily/Monthly Sell Back Aircraft 355 50 0 75 projected
Knott)

9 PAX Flown LTC Knott Daily/Monthly PAX Flown N/A N/A N/A 10,300 N/A

46
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Questions for Control Plan Evaluation


‹ Key Process Input Variables (KPIVs):
„ How are th
H they monitored?
it d?
„ How often are they verified?
„ Are optimum target values and specifications known?
„ How much variation is there around the target value?
„ What causes the variation in the KPIV?
„ How often is the KPIV out of control?
„ Which KPIVs should have control charts?

‹ Uncontrollable (Noise) Inputs


„ What are they?
„ Are they impossible or impractical to control?
„ Do we know how to compensate for changes in them?
„ How
H robust
b t iis th
the system
t tto N
Noise?
i ?

47
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Questions for Control Plan Evaluation


‹ Standard Operating Procedures
„ Do th
D they exist?
i t?
„ Are they simple and understood?
„ Are they being followed?
„ Are they current?
„ Is personnel training performed and documented?
„ Is there a process audit schedule?

‹ Maintenance Procedures
„ Have critical components been identified?
„ Does the schedule specify who
who, what & when?
„ Where are the manufacturer’s instructions?
„ Do we have a trouble shooting guide?
„ Wh t are the
What th training
t i i requirements
i t for
f maintenance?
i t ?

48
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Questions for Control Plan Evaluation


‹ What special equipment is needed for measurement? What is
the measurement capability?
‹ Who does the measurement? How often is a measurement
taken? How are routine data recorded?
‹ Who plots the control chart (if one is used) and interprets the
information?
‹ What key procedures are required to maintain control?
‹ What is done with a service or product that is off spec?
‹ How is the process routinely audited?
‹ Who makes the audit? How often? How is it recorded?

49
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Check List


‰ Process maps detail process steps, ‰ Sampling, inspection and testing
information flow and important plans include how often, where and
variables to who results reported
‰ Key service variables identified with ‰ Operating procedures identify
importance to customer, desired actions, responsibilities, maintenance
target value and specification range schedules and service segregation
defined requirements
‰ Long and short term capability trend ‰ Training materials describe all
charts track variation reduction aspects of process operation
progress and responsibilities
‰ Key and critical input variables ‰ Mil/spec documentation
identified with targets, statistically standards met, if required
determined control limits & control ‰ Process improvement efforts fully
strategies defined documented and available for
‰ Reaction plan in place for out-of-
out of reference
spec processes ‰ Control plan is reviewed and
‰ Measurement systems are capable updated quarterly and resides in the
with calibration requirements operating area
specified

50
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Plan Roadmap Review


1. Collect existing documentation for 7. Pay particular attention to
process adequacy of training, maintenance,
operating and reaction plans
2. Determine scope of process for
current control plan 8. Assign tasks to team members to
p
complete missingg plan
p elements
3 Fo
3. Form
m teams to update
pdate
documentation more than one 9. Verify compliance with area
quarter old documentation requirements
4 Short term capability studies should
4. 10 (Re)train personnel
10.
be replaced with long term
11. Collect sign-off signatures from
capability results
safety & environmental,
5 Fill in Control Plan Summary based
5. maintenance operations and
maintenance,
on review of updated process engineering
documentation
12. Verify control plan effectiveness in
6 Identify missing or inadequate
6. six months with long term
components — gaps capability study
51
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Exercise: Control Plan for GGA Budget


‹ Draft a sample “Control” system, as follows:
a.Select two measures to monitor the GGA budget
process; note if Input, Process or Output measures
b For each measure
b.For measure, define a “trigger”
trigger point
c. Identify short-term responses to problems; note
responsibility
p y
d.Describe response to serious, persistent problems
‹ Prepare
p to share ideas with the group
g p

20 Minutes

52
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Process Control Plan Template

PROJECT NAME DIVISION DIVISION CHIEF DATE


LD09014 Improve Tollgate Templates LSS PMO LTC Garrett Heath 12/18/2007
BRANCH CHIEF PROCESS OWNERS RESPONSIBLE CONTROL MANAGER

Applicable Control Charts and Metrics


Control
Responsible Upper Lower
Action Control Action Target
Individual Freq. Process Step Control Control Current Reaction Plan
Number Value
Limit Limit
If process cycle time for updating templates rises
1 Process Cycle Time Green Belt Quarterly Updating Tollgates 4 Min 5 Min N/A
4 Min, 40 above 8 minutes, PMO will re-examine process to
Sec identify constraints.
Conduct VOC Survey to
100% PMO willl adjust tollgate templates to address issues
2 address issues in FMEA Green Belt Quarterly
Satisfaction
100% 85% N/A raised by VOC.
(Improve Phase) Tollgate Templates
Conduct VOC Survey to
Access to Tools 100% PMO will adjust
j tools and references access to
3 address
dd issues
i in
i FMEA G
Green Belt
B lt Q t l
Quarterly
and References Satisfaction
100% 85% N/A issues raised by VOC.
(Improve Phase)

- Example -

Required Deliverable 53
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

National Guard
Black Belt Training

SOP and Documentation

UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Selecting What to Document


‹ Activities critical to customer satisfaction
‹ Processes/tasks that involve many people
„ Especially changing team players, multiple functions

‹ Complex
Comple activities
acti ities
‹ Areas where “history” is important
„ Will we need to refer to what we’ve
we ve done or how we did this later?
(Examples: DMAIC project tracking and documentation)

‹ Legal and audit requirements


„ Examples:
l Hiring process; financial
f l procedures
d

‹ Where flexibility is essential

55
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Documentation Hints
‹ Language
„ Write at a level appropriate to the user
„ Watch for jargon or techno-ese
„ Spell out acronyms, abbreviations and symbols the first time they
are used
„ Be aware of multi-cultural influences
„ Be clear, concise, and specific
‹ Make sure to quantify
‹ Include process standards
„ Key measures,
measures customer requirements
‹ Provide reference sources
„ A name and pphone number,, e-mail address,, etc.
„ Add cross references when/where applicable

56
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Documentation Hints (Cont.)


‹ Use graphics when/where applicable
„ I
Incorporate
t process maps or examples
l off fforms
‹ Test and validate documentation
„ You may want to ask an objective party
‹ Make it accessible and flexible
„ On line, hard copy or both
On-line,
„ Someone should “own” documentation
„ Have an update and improvement mechanism
„ B aware off audit
Be dit considerations
id ti
‹ Use documentation to train others
‹ Say
S what
h you do,
d but
b do
d what
h you say!!
57
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Documentation Exercise – What Went Wrong?


‹ Three children are told by their parents they can play
after dinner outside.
outside Their only instructions were “Be
Be
home before dark.” One returns at 7:15, one returns
at 8:15 and the third returns at 9:15. Why did the
secondd and
d third
h d get punished?
h d?
‹ Three new employees are hired to three “Cookie”
stores same company
stores, company, different locations
locations. One is
told to follow the instructions to mix dough based on
the instructions in the drawer under the counter, one
is told to follow the instructions posted on the wall,
the third is instructed to follow directions on the box.
Onlyy one
O o e batch
batc cacamee out co
correctly.
ect y What at happened?
appe ed

58
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Project Documentation Package


‹ Trouble Shooting Guides ‹ Process Maps
‹ Reaction Plans ‹ FMEAs

‹ Training ‹ Measurement Systems


Analysis
‹ Maintenance Schedules
‹ Project Scope
‹ SOPs
‹ Customers
‹ Capability Analysis
‹ Project
j Summaryy

59
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

CNX Variables of Cause and Effect


‹ Divide Cause and Effect Inputs into three groups:
„ C (Controllable) -Is this something you can control?
Examples may be a staffing, new hires, telemarketing
scripts speed of delivery vehicle or delivery routes
scripts,
„ N (Noise) -Contributors to the problem that we cannot
control (examples may be weather effects, time a
customer calls in an order, traffic problems,
„ X-A variable we may have experimented with already
‹ For Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), focus on
the “C” variables

60
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Do We Have SOPs?
‹ List “C” variables and prioritize

‹ Determine if a procedure is in place for each. If yes,


then get a copy for the team and include with the
Control Plan

‹ If none in place, the team needs to develop this

61
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

What Is an SOP???
‹ An SOP is specific instructions that detail the task or
activity
ti it that
th t needs
d tto ttake
k place
l eachh ti
time th
the action
ti
in performed. This is to ensure the task is done the
same way each time
‹ It details activities so that a person new to the
position will perform the task the same way as
someone whose been in the job for a longer time
‹ It ensures that task is performed the same way on an
ongoing basis

62
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Steps to Write an SOP


‹ Brainstorm with team to identify all of the steps required to
carry outt a ttaskk or activity.
ti it IInclude
l d iindividuals
di id l that
th t may
not be on team, but are expected to carry out this task
after project is completed. Remember, this helps with buy-
in later
‹ Organize these activities into the proper time sequence and
confirm
f with
h team and d outside
d group
‹ Write the SOP to include additional requirements that
needed to be explained to get a uniform output each time
‹ Review draft with team/group
‹ Meet with Process Owners and secure necessary approvals
63
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Documentation/SOP Exercise
‹ Objective: Understand the purpose and application of
d
documentation
t ti b
by d
documenting
ti your best
b t helicopter
h li t
design
„ “Design”
Design and build the helicopter (done)
„ Document how to build the helicopter (15 minutes)
„ Exchange instructions with another group and build
their helicopter (5 minutes)
„ Compare the actual helicopters
„ Be prepared to discuss your findings with the class

64
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Revision Planning
‹ Identify criteria for revision
„ Unde what
Under hat ci
circumstances
c mstances is revision
e ision likel
likely to be needed?
‹ Determine who is responsible
„ Process
ocess o
owner
e sshould
ou d o
oversee
e see (at least)
east)
„ Responsible person(s) should have process knowledge
‹ Plan the changes
„ Impacts on the process, customers, team players, materials,
systems (Tool: “future-focused” cause and effect analysis)
„ Actions needed to accommodate change: New documents,
measures, training, etc.
‹ Implement the changes
„ Responsibility and timing!
„ Validate SOP and Process Map align.
65
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Revising Documentation
‹ Establish identification and revision codes
„ Examples: 5.0, 5.1, 5.15, 5.2 etc.
‹ Decide what to replace
„ Whole items (all of a training manual, an entire
document of procedures, etc.)
„ O one page at a time
Or, i
‹ Establish a system for distribution
„ Who needs to know?
„ What media will inform them?

66
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Institutionalization
‹ Cultural attitudes and beliefs
‹ Systems and structures
„ HR policies
„ Management Information Systems
„ Training, etc.

Fundamental changes in daily behavior, attitude


and practice make the change “permanent”

67
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Standard Operating Procedures Tips


‹ Establish in conjunction with the control plan
‹ Use illustrations
‹ Use flow diagrams
‹ Use work instructions that really work
‹ Use reaction plans that really work
‹ Focus on the quality of documentation, not the quantity
‹ Use workers to help with the instruction
‹ Clearly lay out authorities, roles, and responsibilities

68
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Continuous Improvement

Putting the new process in


place is not a “one time” activity
Achieving – and sustaining – our
vision requires evaluating and
i
improving
i our processes on an
ongoing basis

MOTTO:
We
e can
ca always
a ays do bette
better!

69
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

SOP and Training Plan Template


SOPs Requiring Revision
- Example -
SOPs Requiring Revision Responsible Status
FY09 SOP Update Lead: Branch Chief, Completed
1 Oct 08 – 28 Feb 09 AO: Team Lead
Next SOP Update schedule Lead: TSC Chief, Complete before FY10 NSPS
1 Sep 09 – 30 Sep 10 AO: Team Lead Cycle
Next SOP Update schedule Lead: TSC Chief, Complete before FY11 NSPS
1 Sep 09 – 30 Sep 10 AO: Team Lead Cycle

Required Training
Required
q Training
g Responsible
p Status
Office Professional Each Team Members are OPD Training Schedule plan
Development encouraged to provide OPD is asked to be updated to
team members.
IIndividual
di id l PProfessional
f i l Branch
B h Chi
Chieff and
dTTeam Susp Date:
S D t Branch
B h Chi
Chieff and
d
Development Plan members Team member discuss and
finalize by 1 May 09
Required Deliverable 70
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Visual Process Control Tools Template


• SOP is posted computer desktop for easy reference access.
• Mistake proofing system in place - copy of DD214 w/checklist is
posted on the counselor’s desk - Example -

Sample DD 214
w/ checklist

Recommended 71
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Mistake Proofing (Poke Yoke) Template


- Example -

‹ Solution: Make use of existing bar codes on shipping paperwork to


mistake proof receiving function
function.
„ Validate with suppliers (shipping company) that all shipping containers will
have barcode label ($0)
„ Purchase RF (wireless) bar coding equipment and software ($100/gun * 20
guns)
„ Train all longshoreman on use and care of equipment ($50/hr * 20 hrs)
„ Install error metrics for error tracking ($100)
Recommended

72
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Future State Process Map Template


“As Is” Process

To Be Process

- Example -

Required Deliverable 73
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Chart Exercise


Did the Process Improve?

74
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Exercise: What Does the Data Say?

• Each of the following 10 examples contain


presentations of data “before” and “after”
an improvement project was conducted

• For each example, answer the question:


Did the p
process improve?
p
• You may answer …
YES NO or CAN’T TELL
YES,

75
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 1
Example 1: Monthly rejects before and after an improvement project

M thl Rejected
Monthly R j t d Units
U it
Before After
2000

1800

1600
ejected Units

1400

1200
Number of Re

1000

800

600

400

200

0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month

76
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 2
Example 2: Adhesion strength in Newtons before and
after an improvement project
(Larger values are better.)

175 165.8

150 140.6

125

100
Newtons

75

50

25

0
Before After

77
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 3

Example 3: Defects before and after an improvement project

Pareto Chart Before and After Project

B D C A E Other

900 Before After


p Chart - Defect B
800
Before After
700
0.10
600
Frequency

0.09
500
0.08
400
0.07

oportion
300
0.06
200
0 05
0.05
Pro
100 UCL=0.04694
0.04
0 _
B D C A E Other 0.03 P=0.03028
Defect Type
0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
S l

78
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example 4
Example 4: Labor Cost before and after an improvement project

Average Salary & Fringes per Employee – Technical Group


Before After
A verage Salary & Fringes

6500

6000

UCL=5601
5500
_
X=5206
5000
LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month

Before After
800
Moving Range
e

600
UCL=484.7
400

200 __
MR=148.4
0 LCL=0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month

79
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 5
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
Example 5: Contract
Deviation fr om T ar get (M inutes)

100
U C L=83.6

50 Before After Preparation Time –


0
_
X=13.7 D i ti ffrom T
Deviation Targett
-50
LC L=-56.1
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number Same data, with control limits
80
U C L=85.82 computed separately for
“Before” and “After” data.
M oving Range

60

40
__
M R=26.27
20 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target

nutes)
Before A fter
0 LC L=0
100

Deviation fr om T ar get ( M in
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number U C L=59.5
50

_
‹ Contracts are rated according to complexity. 0 X=-1.0

‹ A contract rated “A” is the least complex, “B” is -50


LC L=-61.4
moderately complex and “C” is most complex. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number

‹ A target preparation time is established for each type of Before A fter


contract. The deviation from the target is measured and 100

charted in these graphs. 75 U C L=74.3


M oving Range

‹ The first 26 points show baseline (contract preparation 50

time before the improvement project was conducted). 25


__
M R=22.7

0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number

80
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 6
Example 6: Rejected Units before and after an improvement project

P chart: No. of Rejected Units per No. shipped

UCL=0.027143
0.027 Before
After
e
0.026
ejected

_
0 025
0.025
Proportion Re

P=0.024905

0.024
P

0.023
LCL=0.022667

0.022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month

81
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 7
Example 7: Bond Strength before and after an improvement project

B d St
Bond Strength
th in
i NNewtons
t
300 UCL=294.6
Individual Value (N)

Before After
200
_
X=147.2
X=147 2
100

0 LCL=-0.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number

200
UCL=181.2
Moving Ran ge (N)

150

100
__
50 MR=55.4

0 LCL=0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number

82
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 8
Example 8: Defects per Unit before and after an improvement project

U Chart of Defects - Before and After Project


0.16
Before After
UCL=0 15252
UCL=0.15252
0.15

0.14
Unit

0.13
Defects Per U

_
0.12 U=0.11898

0.11
D

0.10

0.09
LCL=0.08544
0.08
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
83
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 9
Example 9: Total Cost before and after an improvement project

Total Monthly Cost - Product Development


Before After
700000
U C L=686558
Value
Individual V

650000
_
X=632876

600000

LC
C L=579195
5 9 95
F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 D ec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
M onth

Before After
U C L=65948
60000
Moving Range

45000

30000
__
M R=20184
15000

0 LC L=0
F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 D ec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
M onth
84
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example 10
Example 10: Cycle Time
ue (Minutes)

UCL=724.9
700 Before After
650
_
600 X=607 3
X=607.3
Individual Valu

550

500
LCL=489.6
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number

160
UCL=144.6
120
ange
Moving Ra

80
__
40 MR=44.2

0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number

85
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Solutions

86
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 1 Solution
Example 1: Monthly rejects before and after an improvement project

Monthly Rejected Units


Before After
2000

1800

1600
Number of Rejectted Units

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month

87
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example 1 and 6 Solution


Example 1: Monthly Rejected Units
Before

Units
After
Monthly rejects before 2000

ber of Rejected U
1800

and after an 1600

improvement project 1400

1200

1000

800

Numb
Same data!
600

400

200

0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month
Example
E l 6
6:
P chart: No. of Rejected Units per No. shipped
Rejected Units UCL=0.027143
0.027
before and after Before
After
0.026
Proportion Rejectted

an improvement _
0.025 P=0.024905
project
0.024

0.023
LCL=0 022667
LCL=0.022667
0.022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month

88
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example 2 Solution
Example 2: Adhesion strength before and after an improvement project
(Larger values are better.)

175 165.8

150 140.6

125

100
Newtons

75

50

25

0
Before After

89
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 2 and 7 Solution
Example 2: Adhesion Strength in Newtons
175 165.8
Headliner fabric adhesion

ons
150 140.6

Newto
125
b f
before and
d after
ft an 100
improvement project 75

(Larger values are better). 50

25

0
Before After

Same data! Bond Strength in Newtons

300 UCL 294 6


UCL=294.6
Individual Value (N))

Example 7: 200
Before After
_
X=147.2
Bond Strength 100

before and after an 0 LCL=-0.3


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
improvement project. Sample Number
200
g Range (N)

UCL=181.2
150
100
__
Moving

50 MR=55.4

0 LCL=0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number
90
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example 3 Solution
Pareto Chart Before and After Project Example 3: Defects before and
B D C A E Other after an improvement project
900 Before After
800
700
600
uency

500
Frequ

p Chart - Defect B
400
Before After
300
0.10
200
0.09
100
0.08
0
B D C A E Other
O h 0.07

Proportion
Defect Type
0.06

0.05
UCL=0.04694
0.04
_
0.03 P=0.03028

0 02
0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample

91
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 3 and 8 Solution
P a r e t o C h a r t B e f o r e a n d A f t e r P r o je c t

Example 3: 900 Be fo r e
B

A f te r
D C A E O th e r

800

Defects before 700


600

Frequency
500

and after an 400


300
200
100

improvement 0
B D C A E O th e r
D e fe c t Ty p e

project
j t 0.10
Before
p Chart - Defect B
After

0.09

0.08

0.07

Proportion
Same data! 0.06

0.05

0.04

0.03
UCL=0.04694

_
P=0.03028

0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample

Example 8: 0.16
U Chart of Defects - Before and After Project

Before After
Defects per Unit 0.15
UCL=0.15252

before and after 0.14


Defects Per Unit

0.13

an improvement 0.12
_
U=0.11898

project 0.11

0.10

0.09
LCL=0.08544
0.08
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample

92
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 4 Solution
Example 4: Labor Cost before and after an improvement project
Average
g Labor Cost p
per Employee
p y – Technical Group
p
Before After
A verage Salary & Fringes

6500

6000

UCL=5601
5500
_
X=5206
5000
LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month

Before After
800
g Range

600
UCL=484.7
400
Moving

200 __
MR=148.4
0 LCL=0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month

93
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 4 and 9 Solution
Average Labor Cost per Employee – Technical Group
Example 4: Labor Before After

ary & Fringes


6500

Cost before and after 6000

Average Sala
UCL=5601
5500
_
an improvement 5000
X=5206

LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
project Month

Before After
800

nge
600

Moving Ran
Same 400

200
UCL=484.7

__
MR=148.4

Process! 0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
LCL=0

(Data set #4 is subset Total Monthly Cost - Product Development


of data set #9). 700000
Before After
U C L=686558
Individual V alue

650000
_
X=632876

Example 9: Total Cost 600000

b f
before and
d after
f an F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 Dec-02 F eb-03
Month
A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
LC L=579195

improvement project 60000


Before After
U C L=65948
ng Range

45000

30000
M ovin

__
M R=20184
15000

0 LC L=0

F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 Dec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
Month

94
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 5 Solution
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
Deviation fr om T ar get (M inutes)

100
U C L=83.6 Example 5: Contract
50 Before After
0
_
X=13.7 Preparation Time –
-50
LC L=-56.1
Deviation from Target
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number Same data, with control limits
80
U C L=85.82 computed separately for
“Before” and “After” data.
M oving Range

60

40
__
M R=26.27 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
20

Deviation fr om T ar get ( M inutes)


Before A fter
0 LC L=0 100

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 U C L=59.5
C ontr act Number 50

_
0 X=-1.0
‹ Contracts are rated according to complexity.
-50
LC L=-61.4
‹ A contract rated “A” is the least complex, “B” is moderately
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
complex and “C” is most complex. C ontr act Number

‹ A target preparation time is established for each type of 100


Before A fter

contract. The deviation from the target is measured and


75 U C L=74.3
M oving Range

charted in these graphs.


50
‹ The first 26 points show baseline (contract preparation __
25
time before the improvement project was conducted). M R=22.7

0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number

95
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Example
p 5 and 10 Solution
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target

Deviation f r om T ar get (Minutes)


100
U C L=83.6

50

Before After _
X=13.7
0

-50
LC L=-56.1

Example 5: 5 10 15 20 25 30
C ontr act Number
35 40 45 50

U C L=85.82
80 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target

Contract

on fr om T ar get (Minutes)
Moving Range
Before A fter
60
100

40
__ U C L=59.5
50
M R=26.27

Preparation Time 20

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
LC L=0
0

-50
50
_
X=-1.0

Deviatio
LC L=-61.4
C ontr act Number

– Deviation from 100


Before
5 10 15 20 25 30
C ontr act Number

A fter
35 40 45 50

Target 75 U C L=74.3

Moving Range
50

__
25 M R=22.7

0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
es)

C ontr act Number


vidual Value (Minute

Same data! 700


UCL=724.9

650 Before After


_
600 X=607.3
550
500
Indiv

Example
E l 10
10: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
LCL=489.6
Item Number
Cycle Time 160
UCL=144.6
120
oving Range

80
__
Mo

40 MR=44.2

0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number

96
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Control Chart tips


p
Binomial data needs to be reported and charted with sample size.
Example: Number of rejects out of number shipped
Items cannot be compared to each other by merely looking at bar graphs
of averages (bar graph = bad; control chart = good).
To measure process improvement, look at impact on the process in total
(total number of defects, total cost, etc.).
Some process changes merely move defect type or cost into
another form.
Measure and chart the “actual thing”!
To measure process improvement,
Avoid ratios and other computed values such as “average cost
per employee”. What matters is impact on total actual cost.
Avoid charting deviation from nominal
nominal, forecast
forecast, budget
budget, etc
etc.

97
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

The only thing worse than no


data is misleading data.

98
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

Takeaways
Now you should be able to
‹ Explain the importance of Control Plans to a CPI
project
‹ Explain the importance of Control Plans to process
management
‹ Given a process, develop
Gi d l a control
t l plan
l for
f that
th t
process
‹ Explain the impact of SOPs on the process
improvement
‹ Describe how to develop an SOP in a project

99
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

What other comments or questions


q
do you have?

100
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

References
‹ Advanced Product Quality Planning from the
A t
Automotive
ti Industry
I d t AAction
ti Group
G (AIAG)
(AIAG),
www.aiag.org
‹ Pyzdek,
d k Thomas,
h The
h Complete
C l Guide
G d to Six
S Sigma
S ,
Quality Publishing, Tucson, Arizona, 1999

101
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO

You might also like