Module 53. Process Control
Module 53. Process Control
Module 53. Process Control
National Guard
Black Belt Training
Module 53
Process Control
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
CPI Roadmap
p – Control
8-STEP PROCESS
6. See
1.Validate
1 Validate 2. Identify 3. Set 4. Determine 5. Develop 7. Confirm 8. Standardize
Counter-
the Performance Improvement Root Counter- Results Successful
Measures
Problem Gaps Targets Cause Measures & Process Processes
Through
TOOLS
ACTIVITIES
•KPIs/Metrics
• Implement Mistake Proofing
•Control Charts & SPC
• Develop SOP’s, Training Plan, Process
•Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s)
Controls
•Training Plan
• Implement Solution
•Communication Plan
• Establish Ongoing Process Measurements
•Implementation Plan
• Identify Project Replication Opportunities
•Process Control / Response Plans
• Estimate Final Financial/Operational Benefits
•Visual Process Control Tools
• Transition Project to Process Owner
•Project Replication
• Develop Audit/Response Plan
•Project Commissioning
• Create Final Storyboard
•Storyboards
• Complete Control Tollgate
•Team Feedback Session
2
Note: Activities and tools vary by project. Lists provided here are not necessarily all-inclusive. UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Learning Objectives
Apply the concepts of Control Plans to process
i
improvement t projects
j t
Apply the concepts of Standard Operating Procedures
to process improvement processes
3
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
4
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
5
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Improvement Confirmation
Confirmation in Six Sigma means statistics that will
b k up your decisions.
back d i i
We will be using calculations that you have already
l
learned
d in process capability
b l and d hypothesis
h h testing
This means comparing the mean and standard
deviation of the original data collected with data
collected after the improvement
7
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
National Guard
Black Belt Training
Control Plans
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
9
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
10
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Mistake Proofing
The best approach to process control is Mistake
Proofing Mistake Proofing is a method for avoiding
Proofing.
errors in a process
The simplest definition of "Mistake
Mistake Proofing”
Proofing is that it
is a technique for eliminating errors by making it
impossible to make mistakes in the process
Unfortunately, mistake proofing is not always possible
or economically practical, therefore you must develop
a plan with on-going monitoring
12
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Control Charts
Control charts are essentially a feedback system
Generating control charts requires on-going data
collection on a process to monitor how it performed
b f
before and
d after
f the
h improvements
13
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
15
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
type of
subgroup
attribute
size
data
DEFECTS DEFECTIVES
sample sample
size size
I – MR X–R X–S
Chart Chart Chart
CONSTANT VARIABLE CONSTANT VARIABLE
Individuals Mean & Mean &
& Moving Range Std. Dev.
Range
NP
C Chart U Chart P Chart
Chart
16
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
17
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
18
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
0.5
0.4
Proportion
1
0.3 UCL=0.3045
0.2
_
0.1 P=0.1069
0.0 LCL=0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17
Sample
Tests performed with unequal sample sizes
SHIFTS
Is the change sudden or gradual?
Introduction of a new material, machine, operator, inspector or test
set, new process controls, maintenance, process changes, change
in proportion of materials from different sources.
TRENDS
Tool or fixture wear, deterioration of materials, aging, changes in
maintenance or calibration,
calibration environmental factors
factors, human factors,
factors
production schedules, gradual changes in materials or process,
accumulation of waste products, machine warm-up.
20
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
STRATIFICATION
Could each subgroup be a mixture of data from more than one source?
Non-random
N d sampling,
li miscalculation,
i l l ti iincorrectt chart
h t ttype, non-rational
ti l
subgrouping, reduction in process variability, changes in inspection process.
MIXTURES
Could subgroups be coming from two sources alternately?
Two or more different materials, operators, designs, or testers mixed in the
process, over adjustments of the process, poor sampling procedures, control of
two or more processes on the same chart
21
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Implementation Notes
Use Control Charts where it will be of benefit
Design the improvements and monitor their impact
over time
Train everyone on how to read control charts
Create a control plan to identify “triggers”
triggers to watch
and “responses” to implement
22
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
23
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
24
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
25
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
28
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
29
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
30
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Revise Perodically
31
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
For Key Process Input and Key Process Output variables, the measurement
system
y and measurement system
y capability
p y should be identified
Targets and specification limits for Key Process Input Variables and Key Process
Output variables are recorded
For inputs and outputs, the process capability should be calculated
The specifics of the sampling plan with associated reaction plan for out-of-spec
conditions should be listed
This document is an extension of the Current Controls column of the FMEA
32
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
S O
Key Process
Process Step Potential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects E Potential Causes C Current Controls
Input
V C
Process Current
Cpk /Date Measurement %R&R Sample Sample
Process Process Step Input Output Specification (LSL, Control Reaction Plan
(Sample Size) System %P/T Size Frequency
USL, Target) Method
33
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
34
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
35
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
36
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
37
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Reaction Plans
Holding the Gain
Monitor and respond to problems
Manage the process day-to-day
day to day
Practice continuous improvement
When
h you improve a process and d
hold the gain, it ensures your efforts
have not been in vain
38
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
procedure
In all cases, suspect or
nonconforming service must
be clearly identified and
quarantined
Can be built from the FMEA
39
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
41
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Reaction Types
Compensate
This type of control involves making a process adjustment to bring the
variable back into control without identifying or correcting the factor
aches
Correct
Approa
Impro
In this type of control action, the cause of the variation is identified and
corrected temporarily. The problem may reappear soon.
Prevent
A
44
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Trouble Shooting
A control plan is a logical, systematic approach for
fi di and
finding d correcting
ti roott causes off out-of-control
t f t l
conditions, and will be a valuable tool for process
improvement
A key advantage of the reaction plan form is its use
as a troubleshooting guide for area personnel
A systematic guide of what to look for during upset
conditions is valuable on its own
45
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
9 PAX Flown LTC Knott Daily/Monthly PAX Flown N/A N/A N/A 10,300 N/A
46
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
47
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Maintenance Procedures
Have critical components been identified?
Does the schedule specify who
who, what & when?
Where are the manufacturer’s instructions?
Do we have a trouble shooting guide?
Wh t are the
What th training
t i i requirements
i t for
f maintenance?
i t ?
48
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
49
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
50
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
20 Minutes
52
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
- Example -
Required Deliverable 53
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
National Guard
Black Belt Training
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Complex
Comple activities
acti ities
Areas where “history” is important
Will we need to refer to what we’ve
we ve done or how we did this later?
(Examples: DMAIC project tracking and documentation)
55
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Documentation Hints
Language
Write at a level appropriate to the user
Watch for jargon or techno-ese
Spell out acronyms, abbreviations and symbols the first time they
are used
Be aware of multi-cultural influences
Be clear, concise, and specific
Make sure to quantify
Include process standards
Key measures,
measures customer requirements
Provide reference sources
A name and pphone number,, e-mail address,, etc.
Add cross references when/where applicable
56
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
58
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
59
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
60
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Do We Have SOPs?
List “C” variables and prioritize
61
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
What Is an SOP???
An SOP is specific instructions that detail the task or
activity
ti it that
th t needs
d tto ttake
k place
l eachh ti
time th
the action
ti
in performed. This is to ensure the task is done the
same way each time
It details activities so that a person new to the
position will perform the task the same way as
someone whose been in the job for a longer time
It ensures that task is performed the same way on an
ongoing basis
62
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Documentation/SOP Exercise
Objective: Understand the purpose and application of
d
documentation
t ti b
by d
documenting
ti your best
b t helicopter
h li t
design
“Design”
Design and build the helicopter (done)
Document how to build the helicopter (15 minutes)
Exchange instructions with another group and build
their helicopter (5 minutes)
Compare the actual helicopters
Be prepared to discuss your findings with the class
64
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Revision Planning
Identify criteria for revision
Unde what
Under hat ci
circumstances
c mstances is revision
e ision likel
likely to be needed?
Determine who is responsible
Process
ocess o
owner
e sshould
ou d o
oversee
e see (at least)
east)
Responsible person(s) should have process knowledge
Plan the changes
Impacts on the process, customers, team players, materials,
systems (Tool: “future-focused” cause and effect analysis)
Actions needed to accommodate change: New documents,
measures, training, etc.
Implement the changes
Responsibility and timing!
Validate SOP and Process Map align.
65
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Revising Documentation
Establish identification and revision codes
Examples: 5.0, 5.1, 5.15, 5.2 etc.
Decide what to replace
Whole items (all of a training manual, an entire
document of procedures, etc.)
O one page at a time
Or, i
Establish a system for distribution
Who needs to know?
What media will inform them?
66
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Institutionalization
Cultural attitudes and beliefs
Systems and structures
HR policies
Management Information Systems
Training, etc.
67
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
68
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Continuous Improvement
MOTTO:
We
e can
ca always
a ays do bette
better!
69
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Required Training
Required
q Training
g Responsible
p Status
Office Professional Each Team Members are OPD Training Schedule plan
Development encouraged to provide OPD is asked to be updated to
team members.
IIndividual
di id l PProfessional
f i l Branch
B h Chi
Chieff and
dTTeam Susp Date:
S D t Branch
B h Chi
Chieff and
d
Development Plan members Team member discuss and
finalize by 1 May 09
Required Deliverable 70
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Sample DD 214
w/ checklist
Recommended 71
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
72
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
To Be Process
- Example -
Required Deliverable 73
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
74
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
75
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 1
Example 1: Monthly rejects before and after an improvement project
M thl Rejected
Monthly R j t d Units
U it
Before After
2000
1800
1600
ejected Units
1400
1200
Number of Re
1000
800
600
400
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month
76
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 2
Example 2: Adhesion strength in Newtons before and
after an improvement project
(Larger values are better.)
175 165.8
150 140.6
125
100
Newtons
75
50
25
0
Before After
77
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 3
B D C A E Other
0.09
500
0.08
400
0.07
oportion
300
0.06
200
0 05
0.05
Pro
100 UCL=0.04694
0.04
0 _
B D C A E Other 0.03 P=0.03028
Defect Type
0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
S l
78
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example 4
Example 4: Labor Cost before and after an improvement project
6500
6000
UCL=5601
5500
_
X=5206
5000
LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
Before After
800
Moving Range
e
600
UCL=484.7
400
200 __
MR=148.4
0 LCL=0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
79
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 5
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
Example 5: Contract
Deviation fr om T ar get (M inutes)
100
U C L=83.6
60
40
__
M R=26.27
20 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
nutes)
Before A fter
0 LC L=0
100
Deviation fr om T ar get ( M in
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number U C L=59.5
50
_
Contracts are rated according to complexity. 0 X=-1.0
0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number
80
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 6
Example 6: Rejected Units before and after an improvement project
UCL=0.027143
0.027 Before
After
e
0.026
ejected
_
0 025
0.025
Proportion Re
P=0.024905
0.024
P
0.023
LCL=0.022667
0.022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
81
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 7
Example 7: Bond Strength before and after an improvement project
B d St
Bond Strength
th in
i NNewtons
t
300 UCL=294.6
Individual Value (N)
Before After
200
_
X=147.2
X=147 2
100
0 LCL=-0.3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number
200
UCL=181.2
Moving Ran ge (N)
150
100
__
50 MR=55.4
0 LCL=0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number
82
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 8
Example 8: Defects per Unit before and after an improvement project
0.14
Unit
0.13
Defects Per U
_
0.12 U=0.11898
0.11
D
0.10
0.09
LCL=0.08544
0.08
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
83
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 9
Example 9: Total Cost before and after an improvement project
650000
_
X=632876
600000
LC
C L=579195
5 9 95
F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 D ec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
M onth
Before After
U C L=65948
60000
Moving Range
45000
30000
__
M R=20184
15000
0 LC L=0
F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 D ec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
M onth
84
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example 10
Example 10: Cycle Time
ue (Minutes)
UCL=724.9
700 Before After
650
_
600 X=607 3
X=607.3
Individual Valu
550
500
LCL=489.6
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number
160
UCL=144.6
120
ange
Moving Ra
80
__
40 MR=44.2
0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number
85
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Solutions
86
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 1 Solution
Example 1: Monthly rejects before and after an improvement project
1800
1600
Number of Rejectted Units
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month
87
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Units
After
Monthly rejects before 2000
ber of Rejected U
1800
1200
1000
800
Numb
Same data!
600
400
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB
Month
Example
E l 6
6:
P chart: No. of Rejected Units per No. shipped
Rejected Units UCL=0.027143
0.027
before and after Before
After
0.026
Proportion Rejectted
an improvement _
0.025 P=0.024905
project
0.024
0.023
LCL=0 022667
LCL=0.022667
0.022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Month
88
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example 2 Solution
Example 2: Adhesion strength before and after an improvement project
(Larger values are better.)
175 165.8
150 140.6
125
100
Newtons
75
50
25
0
Before After
89
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 2 and 7 Solution
Example 2: Adhesion Strength in Newtons
175 165.8
Headliner fabric adhesion
ons
150 140.6
Newto
125
b f
before and
d after
ft an 100
improvement project 75
25
0
Before After
Example 7: 200
Before After
_
X=147.2
Bond Strength 100
UCL=181.2
150
100
__
Moving
50 MR=55.4
0 LCL=0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Sample Number
90
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example 3 Solution
Pareto Chart Before and After Project Example 3: Defects before and
B D C A E Other after an improvement project
900 Before After
800
700
600
uency
500
Frequ
p Chart - Defect B
400
Before After
300
0.10
200
0.09
100
0.08
0
B D C A E Other
O h 0.07
Proportion
Defect Type
0.06
0.05
UCL=0.04694
0.04
_
0.03 P=0.03028
0 02
0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
91
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 3 and 8 Solution
P a r e t o C h a r t B e f o r e a n d A f t e r P r o je c t
Example 3: 900 Be fo r e
B
A f te r
D C A E O th e r
800
Frequency
500
improvement 0
B D C A E O th e r
D e fe c t Ty p e
project
j t 0.10
Before
p Chart - Defect B
After
0.09
0.08
0.07
Proportion
Same data! 0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
UCL=0.04694
_
P=0.03028
0.02
LCL=0.01362
0.01
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
Example 8: 0.16
U Chart of Defects - Before and After Project
Before After
Defects per Unit 0.15
UCL=0.15252
0.13
an improvement 0.12
_
U=0.11898
project 0.11
0.10
0.09
LCL=0.08544
0.08
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
92
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 4 Solution
Example 4: Labor Cost before and after an improvement project
Average
g Labor Cost p
per Employee
p y – Technical Group
p
Before After
A verage Salary & Fringes
6500
6000
UCL=5601
5500
_
X=5206
5000
LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
Before After
800
g Range
600
UCL=484.7
400
Moving
200 __
MR=148.4
0 LCL=0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
93
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 4 and 9 Solution
Average Labor Cost per Employee – Technical Group
Example 4: Labor Before After
Average Sala
UCL=5601
5500
_
an improvement 5000
X=5206
LCL=4812
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
project Month
Before After
800
nge
600
Moving Ran
Same 400
200
UCL=484.7
__
MR=148.4
Process! 0
Feb-02 Apr-02 Jun-02 Aug-02 Oct-02 Dec-02 Feb-03 Apr-03 Jun-03 Aug-03 Oct-03 Dec-03
Month
LCL=0
650000
_
X=632876
b f
before and
d after
f an F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 Dec-02 F eb-03
Month
A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
LC L=579195
45000
30000
M ovin
__
M R=20184
15000
0 LC L=0
F eb-02 A pr-02 Jun-02 A ug-02 O ct-02 Dec-02 F eb-03 A pr-03 Jun-03 A ug-03 O ct-03 D ec-03
Month
94
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 5 Solution
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
Deviation fr om T ar get (M inutes)
100
U C L=83.6 Example 5: Contract
50 Before After
0
_
X=13.7 Preparation Time –
-50
LC L=-56.1
Deviation from Target
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number Same data, with control limits
80
U C L=85.82 computed separately for
“Before” and “After” data.
M oving Range
60
40
__
M R=26.27 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
20
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 U C L=59.5
C ontr act Number 50
_
0 X=-1.0
Contracts are rated according to complexity.
-50
LC L=-61.4
A contract rated “A” is the least complex, “B” is moderately
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
complex and “C” is most complex. C ontr act Number
0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
C ontr act Number
95
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Example
p 5 and 10 Solution
Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
50
Before After _
X=13.7
0
-50
LC L=-56.1
Example 5: 5 10 15 20 25 30
C ontr act Number
35 40 45 50
U C L=85.82
80 Contract Preparation Time - Deviation from Target
Contract
on fr om T ar get (Minutes)
Moving Range
Before A fter
60
100
40
__ U C L=59.5
50
M R=26.27
Preparation Time 20
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
LC L=0
0
-50
50
_
X=-1.0
Deviatio
LC L=-61.4
C ontr act Number
A fter
35 40 45 50
Target 75 U C L=74.3
Moving Range
50
__
25 M R=22.7
0 LC L=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
es)
Example
E l 10
10: 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
LCL=489.6
Item Number
Cycle Time 160
UCL=144.6
120
oving Range
80
__
Mo
40 MR=44.2
0 LCL=0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Item Number
96
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
97
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
98
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
Takeaways
Now you should be able to
Explain the importance of Control Plans to a CPI
project
Explain the importance of Control Plans to process
management
Given a process, develop
Gi d l a control
t l plan
l for
f that
th t
process
Explain the impact of SOPs on the process
improvement
Describe how to develop an SOP in a project
99
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
100
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO
References
Advanced Product Quality Planning from the
A t
Automotive
ti Industry
I d t AAction
ti Group
G (AIAG)
(AIAG),
www.aiag.org
Pyzdek,
d k Thomas,
h The
h Complete
C l Guide
G d to Six
S Sigma
S ,
Quality Publishing, Tucson, Arizona, 1999
101
Process Control UNCLASSIFIED / FOUO