DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based On CPS SPWM
DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based On CPS SPWM
Wei Cai, Yanyan Huang, Zhou Fangyuan, Wenjun Qiu, Caixiao Wang, Qiang
Wu, Shi Erlei & Tao Wen
To cite this article: Wei Cai, Yanyan Huang, Zhou Fangyuan, Wenjun Qiu, Caixiao Wang, Qiang
Wu, Shi Erlei & Tao Wen (2013) DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel
Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based on CPS-SPWM, Journal of International Council on
Electrical Engineering, 3:1, 73-78, DOI: 10.5370/JICEE.2013.3.1.073
Wei Cai†, Yanyan Huang*, Zhou Fangyuan*, Wenjun Qiu*, Caixiao Wang*,
Qiang Wu*, Shi Erlei* and Tao Wen*
Abstract – For extending the power and improving the performance of SVG, a topology with several
parallel plugging convertor modules is obtained, which has no common DC bus. In respect that the
parameter difference among converters, reactive power of total output sharing has to be resolved. In this
article, mathematics model with DQ analytic transformation is analyzed. Based on double close-loop
decoupling control, and direct current control, a reactive power balance current sharing method is
proposed. By using CPS-SPWM, the current harmonic of SVG is reduced, which is indicated by
simulation result. Further, in order to apply the method to project application, a 2Mvar platform with a
double FPGA-DSP controller broad is carried out. The simulation and practical performance of SVG are
given. The validity and feasibility of the method is demonstrated by the results.
Keywords: Active and reactive decoupling, Static var generator, DC voltage control, CPS-PWM
73
DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based on CPS-SPWM
74
Wei Cai, Yanyan Huang, Zhou Fangyuan, Wenjun Qiu, Caixiao Wang, Qiang Wu, Shi Erlei and Tao Wen
hand, by the communication cable to connect each 1) Control system first detects the grid voltage and load-
converter, on the other hand, it has single point of failure. side current. Then load current reactive component is
However, to avoid some converter devices contribute to detected through the d-q transformation. After low-pass
excessive lead to premature aging failure, the unified filter to calculate the load all the necessary fundamental
control of the converter status will enable each converter reactive component. This is all the reactive power required
basically controlled in the same state, which made the SVG to compensate for the load.
working in good condition and enable the CPS-PWM 2) Through the bus current and voltage sampling, the
modulation. Hence, the high power converter device is controller calculates the SVG compensate the reactive
commonly controlled in this way, so does in this article. current reference will be multiplied by the scale factor K =
1 / N. Where, N is the number of parallel modules assigned
4. Parallel Multiple Modules SVG Control Strategy in operating status. Thus, each SVG converter module
output required reactive current is obtained, each
Because of the difference of main circuit parameters and computing unit calculates reactive current value of the
control systems delay, there will be circumfluence among reactive current command value as the converter unit to
converters. To stabilize the DC voltage, active power need submit anti-d-q transformation of each SVG converter
controlled respectively. In the reactive power compensation module calculation unit;
only operation mode, SVG does not output the active 3) Each SVG converter module to control active current
current. So, in the case of stabilizing the DC voltage of the of their own to maintain stabilize of DC voltage. As shown
converter and reactor loss only, the average of active in Fig. 2, anti-d-q transformation computing unit is sub-
current is very small. In most of the application situation, mitted the respective d-axis component of each SVG
the assumption is approved. converter module;
Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes a 4) By multiple SVG converter module, anti-d-q trans-
control method for the parallel modules SVG system. The formation unit calculates the three-phase current signal as a
guiding principle is following: Firstly, by using active and modulated signal to the converter.
reactive current decoupling control, reactive current is able 5) By CPS-PWM modulation, the THD will be restrained,
to control without active current influence. Secondly, by and each triangle phase shifting can be carry out by (6).
controlling the parallel SVG converter module active Where, γ is phase shifting angle of CPS-PWM triangle
control link to control the DC voltage, the SVG converter wave.
module converter to absorb the active just to meet the 2π
γ= (6)
consumption needs of the loss. The DC voltage of each n
converter is controlled separately. Finally, each SVG
converter module output reactive power is equal. The
identical module use the same current reference, so that 5. Simulation
each module working nearly in the same state.
In the SimPowerSystems environment of MATLAB, the
θ simulation model is established.
udc 2
udcr idr1 ud∗1 ua∗1
θ id 1 ωL *
u02 =0 ub∗1
iLa iq1 Cinv
ωL uq∗1
iLb uc∗1
K i
iLc qr
udc 2 θ
idr 2 ud∗ 2 ua∗2
udcr
id 2 ωL *
u02 =0 ∗
iq 2 Cinv ub 2
ωL u ∗
q2 uc∗2
Fig. 2. Control diagram of two parallel modules SVG. Fig. 3. CPS-PWM modulation.
The specific control methods are as follows: CPS-PWM modulation simulation is shown in Fig. 3. In
75
DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based on CPS-SPWM
Fig. 4. Simulation model circuit of four parallel multiple Fig. 8. Output current of converter No.1.
converter SVG.
The output current of three phase bridge converter No.1
is as Fig. 8 shown. And the output current of three phase
bridge converter No.2 is as Fig. 9 shown. The total three
phase current waveform of parallel multiple modules SVG
is as Fig. 10 shown. By CPS-PWM modulation, the
performance is improved.
As Fig. 4 shown, the simulation model have four Fig. 9. Output current of converter No.2.
converter subsystem and a central controller subsystem.
The simulation subsystem of CPS-PWM is as Fig. 5 shown.
The simulation subsystem of three phase bridge converter is
as Fig. 6 shown. And the controller subsystems is shown in
Fig. 7.
76
Wei Cai, Yanyan Huang, Zhou Fangyuan, Wenjun Qiu, Caixiao Wang, Qiang Wu, Shi Erlei and Tao Wen
77
DC Voltage Balancing and Current Sharing Control of Parallel Multiple Modules Static Var Generator Based on CPS-SPWM
The out per performance and dc voltage of single module [7] A. Schonknecht and R.W. A. A. De Doncker, “Novel
is given in Fig. 15. The total output performance are topology for parallel connection of soft-switching
strongly improved, which can be seen in Fig. 16. high-power high-frequency inverters” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 550–555, Mar./Apr. 2003.
[8] L. Matakas, Jr., C. Burlacu, and E. Hasada, “High
7. Conclusion power, high performance parallel connected multicon-
verters: Analysis and control” in Proc. ISIE, vol. 1, pp.
This article is present a design of SVG, which using 121–126, 1995.
parallel modular converter structure. By CPS-PWM, the
THD is reduced. By independent DC voltage control, the
DC voltage is stabilized. Base on the strategy, a application WEI CAI received M.S degree in
design is given. Simulation and experimental results show electrical engineering from Guangxi
the effectiveness of control methods. And the device has university. His research interests are
been stable operation of the in engineering project. high power convertor, power quality
control.
Acknowledgements
References
78