Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern Literatures

ISSN: 0039-7709 (Print) 1931-0676 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vsym20

Building A Translation, the Re-Construction

Business: Poem 145 of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz

Margaret Sayers Peden

To cite this article: Margaret Sayers Peden (1984) Building A Translation, the Re-Construction
Business: Poem 145 of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern
Literatures, 38:2, 143-158, DOI: 10.1080/00397709.1984.10733556

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00397709.1984.10733556

Published online: 02 Sep 2013.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 607

View related articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at

https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vsym20
 MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN

BUILDING A TRANSLATION,
THE RE-CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS:
POEM 145 OF SOR JUANA INES DE LA CRUZ

A MORE SERIOUS TITLE for this paper, which will address aspects of the
process of translation, would be "Reading Poem 145 of Sor Juana Ines
de la Cruz: Variations on a Sonnet." Metaphorically speaking, however,
each of the "variations" can be considered as the product of a builder in
the re-construction business.
For Walter Benjamin a translation had to fit itself into its own lan-
guage "with loving particularity ... just as the broken pieces of a vase,
to be joined again, must fit at every point, though none may be exactly
like the other." 1 You will understand why a translator would not be
thrilled with this figure-the marks of the patching are all too readily
observable, the translator's work distressingly exposed. I like to think of
the original work as an ice cube. During the process of translation the
cube is melted. While in its liquid state, every molecule changes place;
none remains in its original relationship to the others. Then begins the
process of forming the work in a second language. Molecules escape,
new molecules are poured in to fill the spaces, but the lines of molding
and mending are virtually invisible. The work exists in the second
language as a new ice cube-different, but to all appearances the same.
The reference in my title, the role of the translator as a builder in the
re-construction business, derives not from reading on translation but
from the play "La mueca" by the Argentine psychiatrist!dramatist
Eduardo Pavlovsky. One of Pavlovsky's characters, El Sueco, voices his-
and perhaps the author's-esthetic: "Hay que violentar para embellecer;
hay que destruir para crear." One must do violence before one can make
beauty; one must destroy before one can create. This is scarcely an
original idea; rather, a recyclable constant that arises periodically clad in
the robes of a new esthetic. What struck me, however, was how perfectly
it described the act of literary translation. We cannot translate until we
"do violence" to the original literary work. We must destroy-de-struct
(and we must make the obligatory disclaimer: no reference is intended to
the terminology of Derrida, who has pre-empted a word I should like to
use) before we can re-~struct. The translation as edifice seems par-
ticularly appropriate for two series of translations with which I have
143
144 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

recently been obsessed. The first is Pablo Neruda's Odas elementales. In

terms of the metaphor, the ode may be seen as one of the log cabins we
sometimes find in our architecturally underprivileged land: pared to
essentials, elegant in its simplicity, elemental. To translate the ode we act
as a member of a Preservation Society would act. Carefully, we mark the
logs by number, dismantle them, and re-construct them in new territory,
artfully restoring the logs to their original relationships and binding them
together with a minimal application of mortar. My quarrel with many
early translators of Neruda's odes is that once the cabin of an ode (or a
similar poem from one of Neruda's later periods) was constructed, the
translator continued to slather on plaster, covering the simplicity of the
logs with swirling lines and flourishes that completely obscured the
original structure.
The second series of translations that seem particularly receptive to
architectural metaphor are the sonnets of Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz. This
is undoubtedly because the sonnet is inherently an architectural form.
Sor Juana's sonnets are baroque edifices in miniature. To translate them,
the artisan must peel away the ornamental gold leaf, remove the con-
voluted detail of the ornate facade, and strip away baroque accretions
until she reaches the structural frame. All the debris-the components of
the original edifice-must be transported to a new language, to be
restored to its original baroque splendor with the least possible signs of
damage.
Two questions arise immediately. Is it possible? And, is it worth the ef-
fort? The second question is the easier to answer. Yes! To answer the
first would necessitate a digression longer than the present occasion
allows, for it touches the basic question of translatability. Here I should
simply like to test the efficacy of an architectural model for de-struction
and re-construction by applying it to a number of translations of a single
sonnet by Sor Juana, Poem 145, commonly titled "A su retrato" (To
Her Portrait). I wish to reiterate that the sonnet is particularly suited to
such analysis and I am aware the term "architecture" would be highly in-
appropriate when applied to many other types of poems-a poem that
depends on musicality, say, or word play, for its being.
"A su retrato" is one of Sor Juana's most widely anthologized poems,
and pursues themes common to her writing and to the writing of her age:
the treachery of illusion and the inevitability of disillusion.
145
Este, que ves, engafio colorido,
que del arte ostentando los primores,
con falsos silogismos de colores
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 145

es cauteloso engafio del sentido:

este, en quien la lisonja ha pretendido
excusar de los afios los horrores,
y venciendo del tiempo los rigores,
triunfar de la vejez y del olvido,
es un vano artificio del cuidado,
es una flor al viento delicada,
es un resguardo inutil para el hado:
es una necia diligencia errada,
es un afan caduco y, bien mirado,
es cadaver, es polvo, es sombra, es nada.
The trot de-structs the sonnet:
This, that you see, colored (false appearance) fraud (hoax, decep-
tion),
which of art showing (exhibiting, bragging) the beauty (ex-
quisiteness),
with false (treacherous, deceitful) syllogisms of colors
is cautious (wary, prudent) fraud (hoax, deception) of the sense
(reason):
this, on which flattery (adulation) has attempted (claimed,
sought)
to excuse (avoid, prevent, exempt) from years the horrors (fright,
dread),
and conquering (defeating, subduing) from time the rigors (severity,
cruelty),
triumph from [over] old age (decay) and forgetfulness (oversight,
oblivion),
is a vain (empty, futile) artifice (trick, cunning) of care (fear,
anxiety),
is a flower on the wind (air, gale, breeze) delicate (refined, tender),
is a useless (fruitless, frivolous) guard (defense) for fate (destiny):
is a foolish (stupid, injudicious) diligence (activity, affair) erring
(mistaken),
is a worn out (senile, perishable) anxiety (trouble, eagerness), and,
well considered
is cadaver (dead body), is dust (powder), is shadow (shade, ghost,
spirit), is nothing (nothingness, naught, nonentity; very little)
Here one sees the validity of EI Sueco's "hay que violentar"; the trot is
an act of pure violence performed on a literary work. It destroys the in-
tegrity of the sonnet, reducing it to an assemblage of words and lines that
146 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

may convey minimal meaning, but no artistry. The devastation from this
de-struction is so total that, concurrently, we want to de-struct the sonnet
in a different way, within its own language, reducing it not to word
clusters strung along a narrative line but to its architectural frame: its
essential communication. We thus isolate the content that transmits Sor
Juana's philosophical views on the fleeting joy of beauty represented in a
portrait: the illusion that seems to triumph over time by eternalizing
beauty in the oils of the canvas, and the deceit inherent in this counterfeit
beauty. Beauty, Sor Juana warns, is not eternal. Nor life itself, as we
read in the famous, beautiful, and didactic last line of the sonnet. As
beauty yields before time, life itself yields to death: cadaver evolves into
po/vo, po/vo into sombra, sombra into nada. The diagram below
removes the ornamental-and to a degree functional-s-facade to reveal
the structural frame:

Este, que Yes, engafio colorido,

que del arte ostentando los primores,
con falsos silogismos de colores

excusar de los afios los horrores,

y venciendo del tiempo los rigores,
triunfar de la vejez y del olvido,

errada,
1 - - - - - ' - - - -........---'::;......-......

bien micado/

es cadaver, es polvo, es sombra, es nada:

F
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 147

The de-structed sonnet reveals the promise-and then the striking in-
terruption-of parallelism in the two quatrains. Each begins with the
word este-the pronoun substituting for the word "portrait" which, in-
terestingly, never appears in the sonnet. It is the repetition of este as the
first word in line 5 that leads the reader to expect a symmetry in the
quatrains. (Peripherally, though the first eight lines of an Italianate son-
net are thought of as an octave, the abba, abba pattern of the rhyme
scheme, as well as the indentation of line 5 in Sor Juana's sonnet, as
reproduced in her Obras camp/etas, tend to suggest two quatrains.)
The first quatrain is self-contained; every phrase refers to the first
word and could be read in this way: "este, que ves"; "este, que es
engano colorido"; "este, del arte ostentando los primores"; "este, con
falsos silogismos de colores"; "este es engafio del sentido." In contrast
to the first, closed quatrain, the second is open: now este promises a
closure that is not forthcoming. In lieu of the suggested, but failed, sym-
metry with "este ... es," the second quatrain presents a secondary struc-
tural parallelism in the two verb clauses dependent on "en quien la lisonja
ha pretendido" and introduced by excusar and triunfar (on which flat-
tery has sought ... to excuse ... and to triumph ... ). Actually, the sec-
ond quatrain can be read as a long aside to, or restatement of, the first
quatrain. The subject este is never completed by the verb, which is the es
of line 9-and all following lines. The effect of this distancing between
subject and verb is to impel the reader toward the lines of the sestet.
148 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

On first view, the six lines of the sestet (conventionally, but not func-
tionally, broken by a semi-colon), appear to be parallel, the es of each
line repetitively completing the este.oi lines 1 and 5. Este ... is, equally,
artificio, flor, and on through nada. The parallelism is deceptive,
however. There is an important break at the end of the penultimate line,
indicated by "y, bien mirado . . . " (and, well-considered . . .). The
qualities attributed to the portrait before the break are negative-
artificio, flor delicada (artifice, delicate flower)-but not vital. Follow-
ing the break, we are privy to the author's deepest beliefs and emotions.
It is not merely beauty that is transitory; life itself resolves into nada.

A comparison of the architecture of the translations to the original

reveals to what degree, in the process of re-construction, they have been
able to duplicate the original frame. The graphs isolate and replicate, as
nearly as possible, the structural components bared in the graph of Sor
Juana's sonnet. It becomes immediately visible that some damage-from
minimal to great-occurs in every moving process:

This coloured counterfeit that thou beholdest,

vainglorious with the excellencies of art,
is, in fallacious syllogisms of colour,
nought but a cunning dupery of sense;

this in which flattery has undertaken

to extenuate the hideousness of years,
and, vanquishing the outrages of time,
to triumph o'er oblivion and old age,

is a foolish sorry labour lost,

is conquest doomed to perish and, weil takel

is corpse and dust, shadow and nothingness.

(Samuel Beckett)?
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 149

This II artifice of colors that you see

Which boasts the fairest vanities of art,
Ere its false logic and its gloss depart
Will dupe the senses I and the memory.
[Here] flattery immune to time's outrage
Has cancelled out the horrors of the years,
And foiling their dread ravages appears
To vanquish both forgetfulness and age.

I1tTSl a shallow I counterfeit I of pride,

A fragile I flower I that opened in the wind,

A paltry I refuge I when fate closed the doo r,

~ a foolish I caution I put aside,

And outworn ~ that time has bent and thinned;

It is a corpse, dust, shadow, nothing more. U

(John A. Crow)"

What [here] you see in deceiving tints,

Vaunting its crafty artistry
In specious syllogisms of color,

This which flattery would fain pretend

Could expiate the horrors of the years,
The cruelties of time obliterate,
And triumph over age and nothingness,

'Tis but
150 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

'Tis merely

'Tis merely

'Tis a corpse, dust, shadow, nothing at all.

(Kate Flores)4

This II that you see, the false presentment pi anned

With finest art and all the colored shows
And reasonings of shade, doth but disclos e
[is] The poor deceits I by earthly senses fanned!
[Here] where in constant flattery expand
Excuses for the stains that old age knows,
Pretexts against the years' advancing snow s,
The foot prints of old seasons to withstand;

'Tis but vain artifice I of scheming minds;

'Tis but I a I flower I fading on the winds;
'Tis but I a useless I protest I against Fate;
'Tis but stupidity I without a thought,
A lifeless I shadow.] if we meditati
1/
'Tis death, 'tis dust, 'tis shadow.l] yeaJI 'tis II
nought.]]
(Roderick Gill)5

This that you gaze upon, a painted lie,

Blazoning forth the niceties of art
With false syllogisms the hues impart,
Is a shrewd snare, the sense being ta'en thereby.
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 151

This, wherein the flatteries try to cover

The horrors of the years, and to erase
The rigors Time has stamped upon the face,
Age and forgetfulness to triumph over:

Is corpse-is dust-is shadow-and is nought!

(Muna Lee)6

This 11 that you see before you testifies

To the great skill and craft of one well-taught
In art. Its clever syllogisms wrought
Of multicolored paint, [ 1deceive your eyes; I
[Its] deft and cunning loveliness defies
The years to come, with toil and trouble fraught,
Challenging all that time shall bring to naught,
And all that withers when the flower dies.
What of it? Fate will not for long restrain
Her hand. The I flower, I after all, will fade, in stress
Of winter wind, nor ever grow again.
And then, I think, the artist will confess
That this his handiwork is all in vain;

Is dead, is dust, is II painted I nothingness. II

(Frederick Bliss Luquiens)?
152 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

This trickery of paint which you perceive

With all the finest hues of art enwrought,
Which is false argument of colours taught
[ ]
By subtle means the senses to deceive-

This by which foolish woman would believe

She could undo the evil years have brought
And conquering in the war against time fought
Could triumph over age, and youth retrieve-

tossed against the wind,

~----="-----'---~

the power of fate to appease,

1-----'---.......1

iewed in rightful mind,

Is dust, a corpse, a shade-is less than these.

(B.G.P.)8

This that you gaze on, colorful deceit,

that so immodestly displays art's favors,
with its fallacious arguments of colors
is to the senses cunning counterfeit,

this on which kindness practiced to delete

from cruel years accumulated horrors,
constraining time to mitigate its rigors,
and thus oblivion and age defeat,

is but artifice a sop to vanity,

MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 153

I--_~_-l-'----":'-l
to counter destiny,

is but

is but

is but a cadaver, ashes, shadow, void.

(Margaret Sayers Peden)?

This [portrait) so attractive to the eyes,

[This painting] that beguiles with cunning art,
A synthesis of colors that impart
A false impression of the things we prize;
This [painted thing] in which the artist's skill
Has tried to check the ravages of age,
The rigors of the passing years assuage,
And save me from oblivion's ruthless will:

'Tis but

A frail

Inanimated dust, a thing of naught.

{G. W. Umphrey)!"

These comparisons are not meant to suggest that a translation can, or

even should, slavishly follow in a second language the syntactical ar-
rangement of the first. What these graphs do illustrate is the importance
to the re-constructed edifice of a sound structure. When the frame disap-
pears, the edifice collapses of its own weight.
154 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

Even when a translator has mounted a viable frame, the process of re-
construction has only begun. The outlines of the edifice must be fleshed
out and the distinguishing marks of its original beauty restored. Now the
translator must sift through the rubble of his or her de-struction and
rescue such materials as meter, rhyme, vocabulary, rhetorical tone,
poetic figure, and period.
We might begin with period, as it subsumes other elements like vo-
cabulary and rhetorical tone. Certainly the problems of period are perti-
nent to the sonnet. Today very few people read, very few poets write,
sonnets. At the same time, the sonnet has survived in almost inviolable
form. We may conceive of a sonnet without rhyme, but we cannot call a
poem a sonnet in English unless it is written in fourteen lines of iambic
pentameter. The translator of Sonnet 145, then, is faced with a form en-
crusted with centuries of tradition, one whose formalism dictates a sym-
pathetic formality in lexicon and tone. Each of the translations I have
gathered reflects this deference to the sonnet in general and to Sor
Juana's century in particular. In elevating the language of the poem,
each translator knowingly proceeds against the grain of contemporary
poetry.
Each of the nine translators has paid homage to a more formal period
in the choice of vocabulary. The translations are sprinkled with words
like "dupery," "vainglorious," "expiate," "specious syllogisms,"
"fallacious," and "mitigate," as well as consciously antiquated phrases
such as "Thou beholdest," "sorry labour lost," "doth but disclose,"
and "on which kindness practiced to delete." No translator constructed
Sor Juana's sonnet using modern vocabulary or contemporary rhetoric.
Seven of the nine translators felt sufficiently constrained by the tradition
of form to elect rhyme and meter in their re-constructions. Though
rhyme and meter are not content, they are components that cannot be ar-
tificially separated from content, anymore than plaster takes form
without a substructure of lathe or pebble. Conversely, when the frame of
the translation is slapdash, it is usually the result of subordination of
structure to the ornamentation of meter or rhyme. When end-words like
"pride," "bent and thinned," "wall," "snows," "mind," "door,"
"skill," and "power" intrude into the translations, we know they have
no counterpart in the Spanish but are aberrations caused by the exigen-
cies of meter and rhyme.
The rhyme scheme of the Petrarchan or Italianate sonnet (typically
abba, abba, cdcdcd in Sor Juana's sonnets) demands almost impossible
acrobatics from the English-language translator. We are aware of the
reasons. I do not consider it crucial that two translators rejected rhyme. I
do object, however, to their philosophical decision to ignore, or slight,
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 155

meter, to align a poem in an external frame that suggests a sonnet but

does not replicate the rhythm of a sonnet's lines. SB's translation, with
some effort, can be scanned as a five-beat, non-metrical line. The KF
cannot be scanned metrically.
Like the difficulties of rhyme, those of meter are contained within
linguistic peculiarities. The English and Spanish lines are built from dif-
ferent rhythms. The Spanish speaker counts syllables; the English
speaker counts stresses, or beats. Syllabic count does exist in English, but
is uncommon. One might think that the Spanish hendecasyllabic line
(count of 11) would correspond without great difficulty of adaptation
with the five feet (count of 10) of iambic pentameter. This is not the case.
For reasons I cannot explain, an hendecasyllabic line translated into
English almost inevitably adjusts to four feet. Thus it becomes necessary
for the translator to "pad" the lines, to add intrusive foreign materials,
in order to make the Spanish edifice conform to English style. No further
comment is necessary on the numerous pitfalls that await the unwary
translator in this endeavor.
Poetic figures in sonnet 145 are most notable in the sestet and take the
form of metaphor, not simile: este (the portrait) is "artificio del
cuidado," "flor al viento" and, of course, "cadaver, polvo, sombra,
nada." When the metaphor is material, that is, an object like a flower, or
even a cadaver, the original figure is successfully paralleled in the trans-
lations: "a fragile flower," "a brittle blossom"-"a cadaver," or "a
corpse." When the metaphor is an abstraction we find the translations
much less precise. For example, "Un resguardo imitil" becomes vari-
ously, and variantly, "a shield against a sure Fate," "a useless bribe,"
"a ploy to counter destiny," "a frail defence," "a paltry sanctuary," "a
paltry refuge," "against fate an unavailing wall," and in translation
number six, something completely indecipherable.
The questions proliferate. How do these translations conform to the
traditional classifications of translation: literal, approximation, or adap-
tation/imitation? How much is lost if the English-language reader does
not hear-cannot, of course, hear-the allusions to G6ngora in the son-
net's last line? Did faint echoes of Villon's "ou sont les neiges d'antan"
somehow suggest RG's "the years' advancing snows"? What would a
concordance of cognates reveal? Why does only one translator make use
of the crutch of the cognate slant rhyme of favors/colors/horrors/rigors
(for primores/colores/horrores/rigores)? What is the effect of allitera-
tion in the English (as in "brittle blossom," "discreet delusion")? Why
do the re-constructions of the secondary parallelism in the second
quatrain range from perfect recreation to total disregard? Most impor-
156 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

tantly of all, how is the key line of Sonnet 145 translated? This last ques-
tion is one we cannot ignore.
In my first comments on the poem's structure I pointed out how every-
thing impels the reader toward that last line. As it is the essential line, it is
the line the translator must translate with greatest care. Perversely, it is
the most difficult, technically. Among the reasons are the fact that the
words are stated so as to allow no interpretation, and when inflexibility
of meaning is added to the demands of meter and rhyme the difficulty is
raised to the tenth power. In addition, there are the problems of the word
nada itself; it is one of the beautiful words in the Spanish language, and
one of the most difficult to translate. The trot offers "nothing,"
"nothingness," "naught," "nonentity," and "very little" -none of
which is strikingly mellifluous. Neither, with the possible exception of
"naught," does any lend itself easily to rhyme. SB, unperturbed by
problems of rhyme, chose "nothingness," a not unpleasant word if one
can forgive it the awkwardness of being naturally dactyllic in a line that
demands an iamb. lAC rhymes "nothing more" with door, which might
be cited as a prime example of necessity being the "portal" to invention.
KF, like SB, indifferent to rhyme, ends with "nothing at all." RG and
ML find rhyme for "nought" in "thought" (RG) and "wrought" (ML),
RG waxing more elaborately" 'tis 'tis 'tis ... yea, 'tis nought,"
and ML, more simply, "Is ... is is and is nought!" FBL forces
the meter of nothingness for rhyme with "stress" and "confess." BGP's
solution is "less than these," rhyming with "appease." MSP deserts the
"nothing" words for an equally difficult to rhyme "void," resorting to
the near, or slant, rhyme of "bowed" and the true rhyme of "ill-
employed." And GWU makes "naught" the choice of the majority,
rhyming both with "thought" and "wrought."

What may we have learned from this exercise? Facetiously, that the
moving and re-construction trade is not without its perils. More seri-
ously, to the serious critic of translation-not the reviewer who crawls
through a translation on his hands and knees, dictionary in hand, nosing
out words for which he does not find a hundred per cent correspondence
from language to language-I have offered a formula. Thus the reader/
critic may approach the reading of a sonnet translation-and perhaps
those of other formal poetry as well-by measuring basic structure as
well as evaluating ornamentation. I remind the translator always to be
alert to the total structure of the sonnet. This is particularly pertinent in
Sonnet 145 which consists of a single sentence. It is easy to think of this
poem in terms of units contained within the rhyme scheme (two
quatrains of abba rhyme, plus a sestet) or as units determined by
MARGARET SAYERS PEDEN 157

typography. As he conserves the integrity of the design, the translator

must also monitor how rhyme and meter distort and stress the structure,
how words, rhetorical figures, even concepts, can be twisted out of shape
by the very effort to adorn the edifice with beauty and symmetry.
Reading nine translations of Sonnet 145 we have seen the poem de-
structed, and observed the failures and successes of its re-construction.
Those failures and successes reveal to us the strengths and weaknesses of
the original poem as well.
We have isolated the techniques by which Sor Juana impels the poem
toward the last line; seen-though not every translator judged it impor-
tant-the imperious repetition that both postpones and attracts the
didactic last line. What we might not have seen, were it not for the
magnifying lens the translations focus upon the poem, are lines where the
poem itself is "soft." We have noted that the metaphors of the sestet are
laxly translated. With the exception of the material figure of the flower,
and the crutch offered by the cognate "artifice," the translations oflines
9 through 13 bear virtually no resemblance to each other. To a degree the
discrepancies can be ascribed to the translators, but they are not totally
at fault. The imprecision lies in the original lines. Sor Juana, too, was
directed by rhyme: note, for example, the displacement of the adjective
delicada, the near redundancy of necia and errada. Sor Juana's eye is
fixed on nada. She is marking time in the five lines preceding the final
line, letting rhyme and rhythm and repetition bear her toward the
culmination of the poem. The seemingly sound architecture of the sestet
is actually trompe l'oeil. The sonnet, reduced to its fundament, is con-
tained in the first word and the last line: "Este ... es cadaver, es polvo,
es sombra, es nada." Any further reduction would lead to a blank page.
All translations should be followed by a blank page. That blank page
awaits the ideal translation of Poem 145, the reconstituted vase, the
reformed ice cube, the perfectly re-constructed baroque edifice.

University of Missouri, Columbia

1. "The Task of the Translator," translated by James Hynd and M. Valko Delos, 2
(1969), 90.
2. An Anthology of Mexican Poetry, edited by Octavio Paz and translated by Samuel
Beckett (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965), p. 85.
3. An Anthology of Spanish Poetry (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press,
1979),p.119.
4. Angel Flores. An Anthology of Spanish Poetry from Garcilaso to Garcia Lorca
(Garden City: Anchor Books [Doubleday], 1961), p. 147.
5. Ermilo Abreu Gomez. "The Poet Nun." Americas, 3, 10 (October 1951), 17.
158 SUMMER 1984 SYMPOSIUM

6. Arturo Torres-Rioseco. The Epic of Latin American Literature (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1942), p, 38.
7. "Spanish American Literature." The Yale Review, 17 (1928),539.
8. Translations from Hispanic Poets (New York: Hispanic Society of America, 1938),
p.220.
9. Nimrod, 16,2 (Spring/Summer 1983), 82.
10. Fantasy, 10 (1942),43.