Research
Research
Research
Fig 2: Authors and co-authors relationship of the researchers who are working on Employee Performance and
Monetary Incentive “N.B.: (1) Authors who have published at least two documents were considered”
Here we can see that the authors niakas, Dimitris; kontodimopoulos, nick; paleologou, Victoria forms the
maximum link in the set of 3. This shows that these authors are working in the same research field(Employee
performance and Monetary Incentive). While we can see other 10 authors are also doing research in this field
but they are forming a link of 2 and are not linked to any other sets.
Fig 3: Authors relationship of the researchers who are working on Employee Performance and Monetary
Incentive(The largest set of connected authors)
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[1286]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:04/Issue:09/September-2022 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
Co-occurrence Analysis (Key-words)
A co-occurrence network, also known as a semantic network, is a text analysis technique that incorporates a
graphic display of potential connections between individuals, groups of people, ideas, living things like bacteria,
and other entities represented in written content.
In our research we have used this analysis to find out the widely used keywords in all the research papers taken
for study. So, while doing the analysis following criteria was decided that minimum number of occurrence of a
keyword should be 2. So doing this, we got 76 keywords that meet the threshold out of the 840 total keywords.
The following diagram shows the visualization of occurrence of keywords. We found that out of the 76
keywords, the largest set of connected keywords in the research papers consists of 74. So now we have two
visual representation in which one shows the link of all the keywords (Fig. 4) while other shows the link of the
largest set of connected keywords. (Fig. 5)
Fig 4: Network visualization of occurrence of keywords for the topic “Enhancing employee performance
through monetary incentive”
Here we can see that maximum keywords that were used in the papers are motivation, incentives, extrinsic
motivation, financial incentives, employee retention, effectiveness etc. This shows that over the years these
keywords are widely used as a research topic. This also shows that the keywords used in a research paper are
widely used/linked to the other research papers in our sample collection. Also, we can see that most of the
keywords are linked to each other but we have two keywords (i.e public service motivation and social
incentives) which are used only in one research paper and are not linked to any of the other keywords. This
analysis will also help in knowing which keywords are used less in comparison to others.
This analysis will also help the future researchers to pickup the keywords for their research topic or which
keyword to exclude. Basically, this will help in limiting or expanding their field of study which may be linked to
our topic.
Fig 5: Network visualization of occurrence of keywords for the topic “Enhancing employee performance
through monetary incentive” (The largest set of connected keywords)
As a result, we now obtain a density representation of terms usage in research publications in Figure 6 (Fig. 6).
The study of co-occurrence and all keywords resulted in the creation of the density visualization map. Only the
most relevant keywords for our topic were chosen for the production of the density visualization map after the
keywords were personally vetted. Employee performance, motivation, and financial incentives were among the
terms that researchers often used, according to an examination of the density visualization map.
Fig 6: Density visualization of occurrence of keywords for the topic “Enhancing employee performance through
monetary incentive” (The largest set of connected keywords)
www.irjmets.com @International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science
[1288]
e-ISSN: 2582-5208
International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science
( Peer-Reviewed, Open Access, Fully Refereed International Journal )
Volume:04/Issue:09/September-2022 Impact Factor- 6.752 www.irjmets.com
Year-wise publication and Growth Trend
Table 2: Year wise Distribution and Cumulative Numbers
Year No. of Papers Cumulative Papers
2004 1 1
2005 2 3
2006 8 11
2007 17 28
2008 22 50
2009 12 62
2010 20 82
2011 17 99
2012 9 108
2013 10 118
2014 8 126
2015 11 137
2016 11 148
2017 19 167
2018 15 182
2019 15 197
2020 15 212
2021 15 227
Total 227
200
Number of Papers
150
100
50
17 22 20 17 19
12 9 10 11 11 15 15 15 15
2 8 8
1
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Years
200
No. of Papers
150
100
50 34
19 24
13 6 10 8 11 1 11 2 12 9 13 11
3 10 2 6 6 1 1 2 7 5
0
Turkey
USA
Israel
Australia
France
Malaysia
Bangladesh
Canada
Nigeria
Philippines
Romania
Thailand
Georgia
Germany
Japan
Nepal
Russia
Spain
UK
China
Maldives
Argentina
Egypt
Pakistan
Taiwan
Countries
10000
Number of Citations
8000
6000
4494
4132
3752 3696
4000
2454 2139 2262
2068 1789
2000 1359 1279 1090
255
654 478 692 293
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Years
Graph 3: Year wise Distribution of Number of Papers, Number of Citations and Average Citations
Also, using google scholar we took out the information of number of citations of all the research papers. Then
after that we arranged those data according to yearly basis and obtained the table. (Table:4) This table shows
us the sum total of number of citations for the year 2004 to 2021 and also the average citation per document
for the year. We can see clearly from the Graph:3 that the maximum number of citations was done for the year
2010. This means that the researches published in 2010 was widely cited by other researchers in their work.
So, we can assume the work of 2010 to be good enough for the research. Also, for the year 2004, the total
number of citation is very less which means the research work of that period is not that good enough as
compared to others.
Also, we have average citation per document on yearly basis. Here (Table:4), we can see that year 2005 had
highest average whereas 2021 had least average citations per document. This can also be properly seen by the
Graph:3.
Country-wise Publication along with Total Citations and Average Citation
Table 5: Country-wise Distribution of Number of Papers, Number of Citations and Average Citations
Countries No. of Papers Citations Average Citations
Argentina 3 51 17.0
Australia 10 807 80.7
Bangladesh 13 2592 199.4
Canada 2 3 1.5
China 19 3743 197.0
7000
Number of Citations
6000
5000 4458
3982 4065
3743
4000
3000 2592 2371 24692539
2182
2000 1424 1249
1061
1000
807 678 770 855
213 117 357
51 3 0 11 83
0
USA
Canada
Israel
Nigeria
Philippines
Turkey
Australia
Malaysia
Bangladesh
France
Romania
Thailand
UK
China
Georgia
Germany
Japan
Russia
Spain
Maldives
Nepal
Pakistan
Egypt
Taiwan
Argentina
Countries
Graph 4: Country-wise Distribution of Number of Papers, Number of Citations and Average Citations