Module 4 - To The Young Women of Malolos
Module 4 - To The Young Women of Malolos
Module 4 - To The Young Women of Malolos
Knowledge
To the Young Women of Malolos
About:
Salient points:
- Rizal emphasized the need for maintaining the independence of mind and
reason with the attendant strengthening the will. Moreover, he urged women
to be vigilant over their rights and not to be docile and passive in their attitude
towards the many injustices forced upon them.
- She has to rear her children in the service of the state. The women of Sparta
should serve as a model for rearing children for the service of the state,
according to Rizal.
-a wife has to set the standards of behavior for men around her. Basic things
a wife must instill in the mind of her husband: activity and industry; noble
behavior; and worthy sentiments.
Summary:
1. Filipino mothers should teach their children love of God, country and
fellowmen
2. Filipino mothers should be glad and honored, like Spartan mothers to
offer their sons in defense of their country
3. Filipino women should know how to protect their dignity and honor
4. Filipino women should educate themselves aside from retaining their
good racial values
5. Faith is not merely reciting prayers and wearing religious pictures. It is
living the real Christian way with good morals and manners.
Rizal concluded his essay by stressing the need for good education
and liberty as the keys to achieving progress in the Philippines and in solving
the problem of indolence. Thus, he averred (National Heroes Commission,
1964):
Without education and liberty – the soil and sun of mankind –
no reform is possible, no measure can give the desired result. Since some
day or other he will become enlightened, whether the Government likes it or
not, let his enlightenment be as gift given to him and not as a spoil of
war. We wish the policy to be sincere and consistent or highly civilizing
without petty reservations, without distrust, without fear nor misgivings,
wishing the good for the sake of good, civilization for the sake of civilization,
without ulterior thoughts of gratitude or ingratitude, or if not, a policy of
courageous, open exploitation, tyrannical, and selfish without hypocrisy
or deception, withal a well thought out, and studied system for domination and
compelling obedience, for ruling to get rich, and getting rich to enjoy. If the
government adopts the first, it can rest assured that some day or other
it will reap the fruits and find a people who will be with it at heart and in
interest; there’s nothing like a favour to win friendship or enmity, or it is either
hurled into his face or bestowed on him in spite of himself. If the
government decides in favor of a systematic and regulated exploitation stifling
the desire for independence of the colonist with the jungle of gold and the
sheen opulence, paying with material wealth the lack of freedom let the
government attend more to material interests rather than to the interests
of the four friar corporations; let it send out intelligent employees to develop
industry, just judges, all well paid, so that they would not pilfer and lay aside
all religious pretext. This policy has the advantage in that while it may not
completely lull to sleep the instinct of liberty, yet the day the mother country
loses her colonies she will at least keep the gold amassed and not regret
having reared ungrateful children.
What then had made the people realize their sad plight under the
Spanish tutelage? As a result of racial discrimination, the Filipinos became
aware that they were a distinct people. For the first time, they had come to
realize the colonial policies and their resultant conditions could no longer be
condoned. In effect, they accumulated grievances against the colonial
masters, which culminated in the outbreak of uncoordinated and unsuccessful
revolts.
One question raise by Rizal in this essay was, could Spain prevent the
progress of the Philippines? Should Spain decide to do so, what could she
possibly do: keep the people ignorant; keep the people in poverty; or
exterminate the Filipino race?
Keeping the people ignorant had failed. This can be attested by the
awakening of national consciousness among the people, which had united
them. Despite repression in schools to brutalize Filipino students, writers,
artist, and free thinkers had emerged. With the spread of enlightenment, the
ilustrado class arose.
Can the divide et impera or dive and rule policy still work to foster
enmity between and among the natives? To Rizal, this would no longer be
effective owing to the ease of movement in the archipelago brought about by
improved means of transportation. With the facility of travel in the islands, the
people’s opportunity to exchange ideas can be enhanced. This, in effect, can
lead them to realize their common plight which can foster in them greater
unity as a people.
The third article of Rizal’s essay centered on the reforms and political
changes needed for the Philippines to remain under Spanish rule.
Nevertheless, he stressed that reforms have to be initiated by the government
for them to be peaceful and effective. This was because “any change
originated by the masses would definitely be fatal and violent.” What, then,
are the reforms that the Spanish government should institute in the country;
granting of Spanish citizenship to the people; filling of government positions
through competitive examinations; and reforms in commerce agriculture and
education; and greater security for the individual and other reforms.
The last article of this essay delved on the stages that would lead the
Philippines to independence. A stressed by Rizal in this essay, independence
would be unavoidable should Spain not assimilate the Philippines as one of its
provinces. Inasmuch as the Filipinos are not ready for independence, Rizal
predicted that Spain would be deposed or replaced by another power.
What Rizal envisioned in this essay came true. On May 1, 1898, the
Americans entered the Philippines. Fifty years after Rizal’s death, the
independence of the country was recognized on July 4, 1964. This was in
fulfillment of what predicted in his essay. He was a visionary and very
prophetic when he said that “History does not record in its annals any lasting
domination by one people over another, of different races, of diverse usages
and customs, of opposite and divergent ideas. One of the two had yield and
succumb.”