Physics Notes - University of Teax at Austin Part 2
Physics Notes - University of Teax at Austin Part 2
3 Centripetal acceleration
weight v
cable
m T
Suppose that the cable is such that it snaps whenever the tension in it exceeds
a certain critical value Tmax . It follows that there is a maximum velocity with
which the weight can be whirled around: namely,
r Tmax
vmax = . (7.17)
m
If v exceeds vmax then the cable will break. As soon as the cable snaps, the weight
will cease to be subject to a centripetal force, so it will fly off—with velocity v max —
along the straight-line which is tangential to the circular orbit it was previously
executing.
140
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.4 The conical pendulum
θ
h l
T
r
m
mg
The object is subject to two forces: the gravitational force m g which acts ver-
tically downwards, and the tension force T which acts upwards along the string.
The tension force can be resolved into a component T cos θ which acts vertically
upwards, and a component T sin θ which acts towards the centre of the circle.
Force balance in the vertical direction yields
T cos θ = m g. (7.18)
In other words, the vertical component of the tension force balances the weight
of the object.
Since the object is executing a circular orbit, radius r, with angular velocity ω,
it experiences a centripetal acceleration ω2 r. Hence, it is subject to a centripetal
force m ω2 r. This force is provided by the component of the string tension which
141
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
T sin θ = m ω2 r. (7.19)
For instance, if the length of the string is l = 0.2 m and the conical angle is
θ = 30◦ then the angular velocity of rotation is given by
9.81
ω= = 7.526 rad./s. (7.24)
0.2 × cos 30◦
This translates to a rotation frequency in cycles per second of
ω
f= = 1.20 Hz. (7.25)
2π
142
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
eθ
er
and θ. Here, r is the radial distance of the object from the origin, whereas θ is
the angular bearing of the object from the origin, measured with respect to some
arbitrarily chosen direction. We imagine that both r and θ are changing in time.
As an example of non-uniform circular motion, consider the motion of the Earth
around the Sun. Suppose that the origin of our coordinate system corresponds to
the position of the Sun. As the Earth rotates, its angular bearing θ, relative to the
Sun, obviously changes in time. However, since the Earth’s orbit is slightly ellipti-
cal, its radial distance r from the Sun also varies in time. Moreover, as the Earth
moves closer to the Sun, its rate of rotation speeds up, and vice versa. Hence, the
rate of change of θ with time is non-uniform.
Let us define two unit vectors, er and eθ . Incidentally, a unit vector simply a
vector whose length is unity. As shown in Fig. 61, the radial unit vector er always
points from the origin to the instantaneous position of the object. Moreover, the
tangential unit vector eθ is always normal to er , in the direction of increasing θ.
The position vector r of the object can be written
r = r er . (7.26)
In other words, vector r points in the same direction as the radial unit vector e r ,
and is of length r. We can write the object’s velocity in the form
v = ṙ = vr er + vθ eθ , (7.27)
143
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
144
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
Im(z)
z
x Re(z)
145
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
i ei θ
Im(z)
ei θ
eθ er
cos θ
sin θ
θ
- sin θ cos θ Re(z)
Figure 63: Representation of the unit vectors er and eθ in the complex plane.
146
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.5 Non-uniform circular motion
ar = r̈ − r θ̇2 = r̈ − r ω2 , (7.41)
aθ = r θ̈ + 2 ṙ θ̇ = r ω̇ + 2 ṙ ω. (7.42)
Thus, we now have expressions for the object’s radial and tangential accelerations
in terms of r and θ. The beauty of this derivation is that the complex analysis
has automatically taken care of the fact that the unit vectors e r and eθ change
direction as the object moves.
Let us now consider the commonly occurring special case in which an object
executes a circular orbit at fixed radius, but varying angular velocity. Since the
radius is fixed, it follows that ṙ = r̈ = 0. According to Eqs. (7.38) and (7.39), the
radial velocity of the object is zero, and the tangential velocity takes the form
vθ = r ω. (7.43)
Note that the above equation is exactly the same as Eq. (7.6)—the only difference
is that we have now proved that this relation holds for non-uniform, as well as
uniform, circular motion. According to Eq. (7.41), the radial acceleration is given
by
ar = −r ω2 . (7.44)
The minus sign indicates that this acceleration is directed towards the centre
of the circle. Of course, the above equation is equivalent to Eq. (7.15)—the only
difference is that we have now proved that this relation holds for non-uniform, as
well as uniform, circular motion. Finally, according to Eq. (7.42), the tangential
acceleration takes the form
aθ = r ω̇. (7.45)
The existence of a non-zero tangential acceleration (in the former case) is the
one difference between non-uniform and uniform circular motion (at constant
radius).
147
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.6 The vertical pendulum
v’ θ r cos θ
T
r
B
mg cos θ
mg v
A
mg
Consider Fig. 64. Suppose that the object moves from point A, where its
tangential velocity is v, to point B, where its tangential velocity is v . Let us,
first of all, obtain the relationship between v and v . This is most easily achieved
by considering energy conservation. At point A, the object is situated a vertical
distance r below the pivot, whereas at point B the vertical distance below the
pivot has been reduced to r cos θ. Hence, in moving from A to B the object gains
potential energy m g r (1 − cos θ). This gain in potential energy must be offset by
a corresponding loss in kinetic energy. Thus,
1 1 2
m v2 − m v = m g r (1 − cos θ), (7.46)
2 2
148
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.6 The vertical pendulum
which reduces to
2
v = v2 − 2 r g (1 − cos θ). (7.47)
Let us now examine the radial acceleration of the object at point B. The ra-
dial forces acting on the object are the tension T in the rod, or string, which
acts towards the centre of the circle, and the component m g cos θ of the object’s
weight, which acts away from the centre of the circle. Since the object is execut-
ing circular motion with instantaneous tangential velocity v , it must experience
an instantaneous acceleration v 2 /r towards the centre of the circle. Hence, New-
ton’s second law of motion yields
m v 2
= T − m g cos θ. (7.48)
r
Equations (7.47) and (7.48) can be combined to give
m v2
T= + m g (3 cos θ − 2). (7.49)
r
Suppose that the object is, in fact, attached to the end of a piece of string,
rather than a rigid rod. One important property of strings is that, unlike rigid
rods, they cannot support negative tensions. In other words, a string can only pull
objects attached to its two ends together—it cannot push them apart. Another
way of putting this is that if the tension in a string ever becomes negative then
the string will become slack and collapse. Clearly, if our object is to execute
a full vertical circle then then tension T in the string must remain positive for
all values of θ. It is clear from Eq. (7.49) that the tension attains its minimum
value when θ = 180◦ (at which point cos θ = −1). This is hardly surprising, since
θ = 180◦ corresponds to the point at which the object attains its maximum height,
and, therefore, its minimum tangential velocity. It is certainly the case that if the
string tension is positive at this point then it must be positive at all other points.
Now, the tension at θ = 180◦ is given by
m v2
T0 = − 5 m g. (7.50)
r
Hence, the condition for the object to execute a complete vertical circle without
the string becoming slack is T0 > 0, or
v2 > 5 r g. (7.51)
149
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
Suppose that the object is attached to the end of a rigid rod, instead of a piece
of string. There is now no constraint on the tension, since a rigid rod can quite
easily support a negative tension (i.e., it can push, as well as pull, on objects
attached to its two ends). However, in order for the object to execute a complete
vertical circle the square of its tangential velocity v 2 must remain positive at all
values of θ. It is clear from Eq. (7.47) that v 2 attains its minimum value when
θ = 180◦ . This is, again, hardly surprising. Thus, if v 2 is positive at this point
then it must be positive at all other points. Now, the expression for v 2 at θ = 180◦
is
2
(v )0 = v2 − 4 r g. (7.52)
Hence, the condition for the object to execute a complete vertical circle is (v 2 )0 >
0, or
v2 > 4 r g. (7.53)
Note that this condition is slightly easier to satisfy than the condition (7.51). In
other words, it is slightly easier to cause an object attached to the end of a rigid
rod to execute a vertical circle than it is to cause an object attached to the end of
a string to execute the same circle. The reason for this is that the rigidity of the
rod helps support the object when it is situated above the pivot point.
Consider a smooth rigid vertical hoop of internal radius r, as shown in Fig. 65.
Suppose that an object of mass m slides without friction around the inside of this
hoop. What is the motion of this object? Is it possible for the object to execute a
complete vertical circle?
Suppose that the object moves from point A to point B in Fig. 65. In doing so,
it gains potential energy m g r (1 − cos θ), where θ is the angular coordinate of
the object measured with respect to the downward vertical. This gain in potential
energy must be offset by a corresponding loss in kinetic energy. Thus,
1 1 2
m v2 − m v = m g r (1 − cos θ), (7.54)
2 2
150
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
v’ θ r cos θ
R
r
B
mg cos θ
mg v
A
mg
which reduces to
2
v = v2 − 2 r g (1 − cos θ). (7.55)
Here, v is the velocity at point A (θ = 0◦ ), and v is the velocity at point B
(θ = θ◦ ).
Let us now examine the radial acceleration of the object at point B. The radial
forces acting on the object are the reaction R of the vertical hoop, which acts
towards the centre of the hoop, and the component m g cos θ of the object’s
weight, which acts away from the centre of the hoop. Since the object is executing
circular motion with instantaneous tangential velocity v , it must experience an
instantaneous acceleration v 2 /r towards the centre of the hoop. Hence, Newton’s
second law of motion yields
m v 2
= R − m g cos θ. (7.56)
r
Note, however, that there is a constraint on the reaction R that the hoop can
exert on the object. This reaction must always be positive. In other words, the
hoop can push the object away from itself, but it can never pull it towards itself.
Another way of putting this is that if the reaction ever becomes negative then
151
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
the object will fly off the surface of the hoop, since it is no longer being pressed
into this surface. It should be clear, by now, that the problem we are considering
is exactly analogous to the earlier problem of an object attached to the end of a
piece of string which is executing a vertical circle, with the reaction R of the hoop
playing the role of the tension T in the string.
Let us imagine that the hoop under consideration is a “loop the loop” segment
in a fairground roller-coaster. The object sliding around the inside of the loop
then becomes the roller-coaster train. Suppose that the fairground operator can
vary the velocity v with which the train is sent into the bottom of the loop (i.e.,
the velocity at θ = 0◦ ). What is the safe range of v? Now, if the train starts at
θ = 0◦ with velocity v then there are only three possible outcomes. Firstly, the
train can execute a complete circuit of the loop. Secondly, the train can slide
part way up the loop, come to a halt, reverse direction, and then slide back down
again. Thirdly, the train can slide part way up the loop, but then fall off the loop.
Obviously, it is the third possibility that the fairground operator would wish to
guard against.
Using the analogy between this problem and the problem of a mass on the end
of a piece of string executing a vertical circle, the condition for the roller-coaster
train to execute a complete circuit is
v2 > 5 r g. (7.57)
Note, interestingly enough, that this condition is independent of the mass of the
train.
R = m g cos θ. (7.59)
Note that this equation can only be satisfied for positive R when cos θ > 0. In
other words, the train can only turn around without falling off the loop if the
152
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
mg cos θ
m
R
r cos θ r
θ v
mg
turning point lies in the lower half of the loop (i.e., −90◦ < θ < 90◦ ). The
condition for the train to fall off the loop is
2
v = −r g cos θ. (7.60)
Note that this equation can only be satisfied for positive v 2 when cos θ < 0. In
other words, the train can only fall off the loop when it is situated in the upper
half of the loop. It is fairly clear that if the train’s initial velocity is not sufficiently
large for it to execute a complete circuit of the loop, and not sufficiently small
for it to turn around before entering the upper half of the loop, then it must
inevitably fall off the loop somewhere in the loop’s upper half. The critical value
of v2 above which the train executes a complete circuit is 5 r g [see Eq. (7.57)].
The critical value of v2 at which the train just turns around before entering the
upper half of the loop is 2 r g [this is obtained from Eq. (7.55) by setting v = 0
and θ = 90◦ ]. Hence, the dangerous range of v2 is
2 r g < v2 < 5 r g. (7.61)
For v2 < 2 r g, the train turns around in the lower half of the loop. For v2 > 5 r g,
the train executes a complete circuit around the loop. However, for 2 r g < v2 <
5 r g, the train falls off the loop somewhere in its upper half.
153
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
Suppose that the skier has reached angular coordinate θ. At this stage, the
skier has fallen though a height r (1 − cos θ). Thus, the tangential velocity v of
the skier is given by energy conservation:
1
m v2 = m g r (1 − cos θ). (7.62)
2
Let us now consider the skier’s radial acceleration. The radial forces acting on the
skier are the reaction R exerted by the mountain, which acts radially outwards,
and the component of the skier’s weight m g cos θ, which acts radially inwards.
Since the skier is executing circular motion, radius r, with instantaneous tangen-
tial velocity v, he/she experiences an instantaneous inward radial acceleration
v2 /r. Hence, Newton’s second law of motion yields
v2
m = m g cos θ − R. (7.63)
r
Question: Civil engineers generally bank curves on roads in such a manner that
a car going around the curve at the recommended speed does not have to rely
on friction between its tires and the road surface in order to round the curve.
Suppose that the radius of curvature of a given curve is r = 60 m, and that
the recommended speed is v = 40 km/h. At what angle θ should the curve be
banked?
154
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
R car
centre of curvature
mg
θ
banked curve
Answer: Consider a car of mass m going around the curve. The car’s weight, m g,
acts vertically downwards. The road surface exerts an upward normal reaction R
on the car. The vertical component of the reaction must balance the downward
weight of the car, so
R cos θ = m g.
The horizontal component of the reaction, R sin θ, acts towards the centre of
curvature of the road. This component provides the force m v2 /r towards the
centre of the curvature which the car experiences as it rounds the curve. In other
words,
v2
R sin θ = m ,
r
which yields
v2
tan θ = ,
rg
or ⎛ ⎞
2
v
θ = tan−1 ⎝ ⎠ .
rg
Hence, ⎛ ⎞
−1 ⎝ (40 × 1000/3600)2 ⎠
θ = tan = 11.8◦ .
60 × 9.81
Note that if the car attempts to round the curve at the wrong speed then m v 2 /r =
m g tan θ, and the difference has to be made up by a sideways friction force
exerted between the car’s tires and the road surface. Unfortunately, this does not
always work—especially if the road surface is wet!
155
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
Question: A car of mass m = 2000 kg travels around a flat circular race track of
radius r = 85 m. The car starts at rest, and its speed increases at the constant rate
aθ = 0.6 m/s. What is the speed of the car at the point when its centripetal and
tangential accelerations are equal?
Answer: The tangential acceleration of the car is aθ = 0.6 m/s. When the car
travels with tangential velocity v its centripetal acceleration is a r = v2 /r. Hence,
ar = aθ when
v2
= aθ ,
r
or √
√
v = r aθ = 85 × 0.6 = 7.14 m/s.
Question: An amusement park ride consists of a vertical cylinder that spins about
a vertical axis. When the cylinder spins sufficiently fast, any person inside it is
held up against the wall. Suppose that the coefficient of static friction between
a typical person and the wall is μ = 0.25. Let the mass of an typical person be
m = 60 kg, and let r = 7 m be the radius of the cylinder. Find the critical angular
velocity of the cylinder above which a typical person will not slide down the
wall. How many revolutions per second is the cylinder executing at this critical
velocity?
In the radial direction, the person is subject to a single force: namely, the
156
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
mg f
reaction R due to the wall, which acts radially inwards. If the cylinder (and,
hence, the person) rotates with angular velocity ω, then this force must provided
the acceleration r ω2 towards the axis of rotation. Hence,
R = m r ω2 .
Answer: Let m be the mass of the pilot. Consider the radial acceleration of the
pilot at the top of the loop. The pilot is subject to two radial forces: the gravita-
tional force m g, which acts towards the centre of the loop, and the reaction force
R, due to the plane, which acts away from the centre of the loop. Since the pilot
157
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
mg
Answer: When the bullet strikes the bob, and then sticks to it, the bullet and bob
move off with a velocity v which is given by momentum conservation:
m v = (M + m) v .
158
7 CIRCULAR MOTION 7.7 Motion on curved surfaces
Hence,
mv
v = .
M+m
Consider the case where the bob is suspended by a rigid rod. If the bob and
bullet only just manage to execute a vertical loop, then their initial kinetic energy
(1/2) (M + m) v 2 must only just be sufficient to lift them from the bottom to the
top of the loop—a distance 2 l. Hence, in this critical case, energy conservation
yields
1 2
(M + m) v = (M + m) 2 g l,
2
which implies
2
v = 4 g l,
or √ √
(M + m) 4gl 1.31 × 4 × 9.81 × 0.6
v= = = 635.6 m/s.
m 0.01
Consider the case where the bob is suspended by a flexible rod. The velocity v
of the bob and bullet at the top of the loop is obtained from energy conservation:
1 2 1 2
(M + m) v = (M + m) v − (M + m) 2 g l.
2 2
If the bob and bullet only just manage to execute a vertical loop, then the tension
in the rod is zero at the top of the loop. Hence, the acceleration due to gravity
g must account exactly for the required acceleration v 2 /l towards the centre of
the loop:
v 2
= g.
l
It follows that, in this critical case,
2
v = 5 g l,
or √ √
(M + m) 5gl 1.31 × 5 × 9.81 × 0.6
v= = = 710.7 m/s.
m 0.01
159
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION
8 Rotational motion
8.1 Introduction
Up to now, we have only analyzed the dynamics of point masses (i.e., objects
whose spatial extent is either negligible or plays no role in their motion). Let us
now broaden our approach in order to take extended objects into account. Now,
the only type of motion which a point mass object can exhibit is translational mo-
tion: i.e., motion by which the object moves from one point in space to another.
However, an extended object can exhibit another, quite distinct, type of motion
by which it remains located (more or less) at the same spatial position, but con-
stantly changes its orientation with respect to other fixed points in space. This
new type of motion is called rotation. Let us investigate rotational motion.
Consider a rigid body executing pure rotational motion (i.e., rotational motion
which has no translational component). It is possible to define an axis of rotation
(which, for the sake of simplicity, is assumed to pass through the body)—this axis
corresponds to the straight-line which is the locus of all points inside the body
which remain stationary as the body rotates. A general point located inside the
body executes circular motion which is centred on the rotation axis, and orien-
tated in the plane perpendicular to this axis. In the following, we tacitly assume
that the axis of rotation remains fixed.
Figure 67 shows a typical rigidly rotating body. The axis of rotation is the line
AB. A general point P lying within the body executes a circular orbit, centred
on AB, in the plane perpendicular to AB. Let the line QP be a radius of this
orbit which links the axis of rotation to the instantaneous position of P at time
t. Obviously, this implies that QP is normal to AB. Suppose that at time t + δt
point P has moved to P , and the radius QP has rotated through an angle δφ.
160
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.2 Rigid body rotation
A
rigid body
P’ δφ
Q P
B axis of rotation
161
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.3 Is rotation a vector?
For a body rotating with constant angular velocity, ω, the angular acceleration
is zero, and the rotation angle φ increases linearly with time:
φ(t) = φ0 + ω t, (8.4)
where φ0 = φ(t = 0). Likewise, for a body rotating with constant angular accel-
eration, α, the angular velocity increases linearly with time, so that
ω(t) = ω0 + α t, (8.5)
and the rotation angle satisfies
1 2
φ(t) = φ0 + ω0 t + αt . (8.6)
2
Here, ω0 = ω(t = 0). Note that there is a clear analogy between the above equa-
tions, and the equations of rectilinear motion at constant acceleration introduced
in Sect. 2.6—rotation angle plays the role of displacement, angular velocity plays
the role of (regular) velocity, and angular acceleration plays the role of (regular)
acceleration.
Consider a rigid body which rotates through an angle φ about a given axis. It
is tempting to try to define a rotation “vector” φ which describes this motion.
For example, suppose that φ is defined as the “vector” whose magnitude is the
angle of rotation, φ, and whose direction runs parallel to the axis of rotation.
Unfortunately, this definition is ambiguous, since there are two possible directions
which run parallel to the rotation axis. However, we can resolve this problem by
adopting the following convention—the rotation “vector” runs parallel to the axis
of rotation in the sense indicated by the thumb of the right-hand, when the fingers
of this hand circulate around the axis in the direction of rotation. This convention
is known as the right-hand grip rule. The right-hand grip rule is illustrated in
Fig. 68.
162
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.3 Is rotation a vector?
sense of rotation
The rotation “vector” φ now has a well-defined magnitude and direction. But,
is this quantity really a vector? This may seem like a strange question to ask,
but it turns out that not all quantities which have well-defined magnitudes and
directions are necessarily vectors. Let us review some properties of vectors. If a
and b are two general vectors, then it is certainly the case that
a + b = b + a. (8.7)
There is a direct analogy between rotation and motion over the Earth’s surface.
After all, the motion of a pointer along the Earth’s equator from longitude 0 ◦ W to
163
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.3 Is rotation a vector?
x
y
z-axis x-axis
x-axis z-axis
164
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.3 Is rotation a vector?
longitude 90◦ W could just as well be achieved by keeping the pointer fixed and ro-
tating the Earth through 90◦ about a North-South axis. The non-commutative na-
ture of rotation “vectors” is a direct consequence of the non-planar (i.e., curved)
nature of the Earth’s surface. For instance, suppose we start off at (0◦ N, 0◦ W),
which is just off the Atlantic coast of equatorial Africa, and rotate 90 ◦ northwards
and then 90◦ eastwards. We end up at (0◦ N, 90◦ E), which is in the middle of the
Indian Ocean. However, if we start at the same point, and rotate 90 ◦ eastwards
and then 90◦ northwards, we end up at the North pole. Hence, large rotations
over the Earth’s surface do not commute. Let us now repeat this experiment
on a far smaller scale. Suppose that we walk 10 m northwards and then 10 m
eastwards. Next, suppose that—starting from the same initial position—we walk
10 m eastwards and then 10 m northwards. In this case, few people would need
much convincing that the two end points are essentially identical. The crucial
point is that for sufficiently small displacements the Earth’s surface is approxi-
mately planar, and vector displacements on a plane surface commute with one
another. This observation immediately suggests that rotation “vectors” which cor-
respond to rotations through small angles must also commute with one another.
In other words, although the quantity φ, defined above, is not a true vector, the
infinitesimal quantity δφ, which is defined in a similar manner but corresponds
to a rotation through an infinitesimal angle δφ, is a perfectly good vector.
165
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.4 The vector product
Suppose, for example, that a rigid body rotates at constant angular velocity
ω1 . Let us now combine this motion with rotation about a different axis at con-
stant angular velocity ω2 . What is the subsequent motion of the body? Since we
know that angular velocity is a vector, we can be certain that the combined mo-
tion simply corresponds to rotation about a third axis at constant angular velocity
ω3 = ω1 + ω2 , (8.9)
where the sum is performed according to the standard rules of vector addition.
[Note, however, the following important proviso. In order for Eq. (8.9) to be
valid, the rotation axes corresponding to ω1 and ω2 must cross at a certain
point—the rotation axis corresponding to ω3 then passes through this point.]
Moreover, a constant angular velocity
^ + ωy y
ω = ωx x ^ + ωz ^z (8.10)
We saw earlier, in Sect. 3.10, that it is possible to combine two vectors multi-
plicatively, by means of a scalar product, to form a scalar. Recall that the scalar
product a·b of two vectors a = (ax , ay , az ) and b = (bx , by , bz ) is defined
166
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.4 The vector product
ax b |a x b| = a b sin θ
θ
a
Figure 70: The vector product.
167
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.5 Centre of mass
Now that we have defined the vector product of two vectors, let us find a use
for this concept. Figure 71 shows a rigid body rotating with angular velocity ω.
For the sake of simplicity, the axis of rotation, which runs parallel to ω, is as-
sumed to pass through the origin O of our coordinate system. Point P, whose
position vector is r, represents a general point inside the body. What is the veloc-
ity of rotation v at point P? Well, the magnitude of this velocity is simply
v = σ ω = ω r sin θ, (8.15)
where σ is the perpendicular distance of point P from the axis of rotation, and
θ is the angle subtended between the directions of ω and r. The direction of
the velocity is into the page. Another way of saying this, is that the direction of
the velocity is mutually perpendicular to the directions of ω and r, in the sense
indicated by the right-hand grip rule when ω is rotated onto r (through an angle
less than 180◦ ). It follows that we can write
v = ω × r. (8.16)
Note, incidentally, that the direction of the angular velocity vector ω indicates
the orientation of the axis of rotation—however, nothing actually moves in this
direction; in fact, all of the motion is perpendicular to the direction of ω.
168
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.5 Centre of mass
σ v
P
θ r
O
mi = ρ(ri ) Vi , (8.18)
where ρ(r) is the mass density of the object, and Vi is the volume occupied by
the ith element. Here, it is assumed that this volume is small compared to the
total volume of the object. Taking the limit that the number of elements goes
to infinity, and the volume of each element goes to zero, Eqs. (8.17) and (8.18)
yield the following integral formula for the position vector of the centre of mass:
1
rcm = ρ r dV. (8.19)
M
Here, the integral is taken over the whole volume of the object, and dV =
dx dy dz is an element of that volume. Incidentally, the triple integral sign in-
dicates a volume integral: i.e., a simultaneous integral over three independent
Cartesian coordinates. Finally, for an object whose mass density is constant—
which is the only type of object that we shall be considering in this course—the
above expression reduces to
1
rcm = r dV, (8.20)
V
169
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.5 Centre of mass
where V is the volume of the object. According to Eq. (8.20), the centre of mass
of a body of uniform density is located at the geometric centre of that body.
geometric centre
a
a
Figure 72: Locating the geometric centre of a cube.
For many solid objects, the location of the geometric centre follows from sym-
metry. For instance, the geometric centre of a cube is the point of intersection
of the cube’s diagonals. See Fig. 72. Likewise, the geometric centre of a right
cylinder is located on the axis, half-way up the cylinder. See Fig. 73.
axis
geometric centre
h/2
170
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.5 Centre of mass
y z
geometric centre
a x h
a z cm
x
a a
171
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
Consider an extended object which is made up of N elements. Let the ith element
possess mass mi , position vector ri , and velocity vi . The total kinetic energy of
the object is written
1
K= mi vi2 . (8.26)
i=1,N
2
Suppose that the motion of the object consists merely of rigid rotation at angular
velocity ω. It follows, from Sect. 8.4, that
vi = ω × r i . (8.27)
Let us write
ω = ω k, (8.28)
where k is a unit vector aligned along the axis of rotation (which is assumed
to pass through the origin of our coordinate system). It follows from the above
equations that the kinetic energy of rotation of the object takes the form
1
K= mi |k × ri |2 ω2 , (8.29)
i=1,N
2
or
1
K= I ω2 . (8.30)
2
172
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
Here, the quantity I is termed the moment of inertia of the object, and is written
I= mi |k × ri |2 = mi σi2 , (8.31)
i=1,N i=1,N
where σi = |k × ri | is the perpendicular distance from the ith element to the axis
of rotation. Note that for translational motion we usually write
1
K= M v2 , (8.32)
2
where M represents mass and v represents speed. A comparison of Eqs. (8.30)
and (8.32) suggests that moment of inertia plays the same role in rotational
motion that mass plays in translational motion.
The moment of inertia of a uniform object depends not only on the size and
shape of that object but on the location of the axis about which the object is
rotating. In particular, the same object can have different moments of inertia
when rotating about different axes.
173
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
axis I = M b2
M
ring
Figure 75: The moment of inertia of a ring about a perpendicular symmetric axis.
b is its radius. Each element of the ring shares a common perpendicular distance
from the axis of rotation—i.e., σ = b. Hence, Eq. (8.34) reduces to
I = M b2 . (8.35)
174
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
z
Iz = I x + I y
Let us use the perpendicular axis theorem to find the moment of inertia of a
thin ring about a symmetric axis which lies in the plane of the ring. Adopting the
coordinate system shown in Fig. 77, it is clear, from symmetry, that Ix = Iy . Now,
we already know that Iz = M b2 , where M is the mass of the ring, and b is its
radius. Hence, the perpendicular axis theorem tells us that
2 Ix = I z , (8.40)
or
Iz 1
Ix = = M b2 . (8.41)
2 2
Of course, Iz > Ix , because when the ring spins about the z-axis its elements are,
on average, farther from the axis of rotation than when it spins about the x-axis.
The second useful theorem regarding moments of inertia is called the parallel
axis theorem. The parallel axis theorem—which is quite general—states that if I
is the moment of inertia of a given body about an axis passing through the centre
175
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
ring
Figure 77: The moment of inertia of a ring about a coplanar symmetric axis.
of mass of that body, then the moment of inertia I of the same body about a
second axis which is parallel to the first is
I = I + M d2 , (8.42)
where M is the mass of the body, and d is the perpendicular distance between
the two axes.
In order to prove the parallel axis theorem, let us choose the origin of our
coordinate system to coincide with the centre of mass of the body in question.
Furthermore, let us orientate the axes of our coordinate system such that the z-
axis coincides with the first axis of rotation, whereas the second axis pieces the
x-y plane at x = d, y = 0. From Eq. (8.20), the fact that the centre of mass is
located at the origin implies that
x dx dy dz = y dx dy dz = z dx dy dz = 0, (8.43)
where the integrals are taken over the volume of the body. From Eq. (8.34), the
expression for the first moment of inertia is
2
(x + y2 ) dx dy dz
I=M , (8.44)
dx dy dz
since x2 + y2 is the perpendicular distance of a general point (x, y, z) from the
z-axis. Likewise, the expression for the second moment of inertia takes the form
[(x − d)2 + y2 ] dx dy dz
I = M . (8.45)
dx dy dz
176
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.6 Moment of inertia
I = I + M d2 , (8.47)
Let us use the parallel axis theorem to calculate the moment of inertia, I , of
a thin ring about an axis which runs perpendicular to the plane of the ring, and
passes through the circumference of the ring. We know that the moment of inertia
of a ring of mass M and radius b about an axis which runs perpendicular to the
plane of the ring, and passes through the centre of the ring—which coincides
with the centre of mass of the ring—is I = M b2 . Our new axis is parallel to this
original axis, but shifted sideways by the perpendicular distance b. Hence, the
parallel axis theorem tells us that
I = I + M b 2 = 2 M b2 . (8.48)
axis 2 axis 2
I=Mb I=2Mb
M M
ring ring
b b
where the integrals are taken over the area of the disk, and the redundant z-
integration has been suppressed.
Let us divide the disk up into thin annuli. Con-
sider an annulus of radius σ = x2 + y2 and radial thickness dσ. The area of this
annulus is simply 2π σ dσ. Hence, we can replace dx dy in the above integrals by
2π σ dσ, so as to give
b 3
0 2π σ dσ
I = M b . (8.50)
0 2π σ dσ
The above expression yields
b
2 π σ4 /4 1
I=M 0
b = M b2 . (8.51)
[2 π σ /2]0
2 2
• The moment of inertia of a thin rod of mass M and length l about an axis
passing through the centre of the rod and perpendicular to its length is
1
I= M l2 .
12
• The moment of inertia of a thin rectangular sheet of mass M and dimensions
a and b about a perpendicular axis passing through the centre of the sheet
is
1
I= M (a2 + b2 ).
12
178
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.7 Torque
• The moment of inertia of a solid cylinder of mass M and radius b about the
cylindrical axis is
1
I = M b2 .
2
• The moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell of mass M and radius b about
a diameter is
2
I = M b2 .
3
• The moment of inertia of a solid sphere of mass M and radius b about a
diameter is
2
I = M b2 .
5
8.7 Torque
Let us choose the origin O of our coordinate system to coincide with the pivot
point of the wheel—i.e., the point of intersection between the wheel and the axis
of rotation. Let r be the position vector of point P, and let θ be the angle sub-
tended between the directions of r and f. We can resolve f into two components—
namely, a component f cos θ which acts radially, and a component f sin θ which
acts tangentially. The radial component of f is canceled out by a reaction at the
pivot, since the wheel is assumed to be mounted in such a manner that it can only
rotate, and is prevented from displacing sideways. The tangential component of
f causes the wheel to accelerate tangentially. Let v be the instantaneous rotation
velocity of the wheel’s circumference. Newton’s second law of motion, applied to
179
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.7 Torque
f sinθ f
O r
P
b
M v̇ = f sin θ, (8.52)
Let us now convert the above expression into a rotational equation of motion.
If ω is the instantaneous angular velocity of the wheel, then the relation between
ω and v is simply
v = b ω. (8.53)
Since the wheel is basically a ring of radius b, rotating about a perpendicular
symmetric axis, its moment of inertia is
I = M b2 . (8.54)
I ω̇ = τ, (8.55)
where
τ = f b sin θ. (8.56)
Equation (8.55) is the angular equation of motion of the wheel. It relates the
wheel’s angular velocity, ω, and moment of inertia, I, to a quantity, τ, which is
known as the torque. Clearly, if I is analogous to mass, and ω is analogous to
180
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.7 Torque
f
τ=fl
θ
b P
velocity, then torque must be analogous to force. In other words, torque is the
rotational equivalent of force.
It is clear, from Eq. (8.56), that a torque is the product of the magnitude of
the applied force, f, and some distance l = b sin θ. The physical interpretation
of l is illustrated in Fig. 80. If can be seen that l is the perpendicular distance of
the line of action of the force from the axis of rotation. We usually refer to this
distance as the length of the lever arm.
181
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.7 Torque
Since force is a vector quantity, it stands to reason that torque must also be
a vector quantity. It follows that Eq. (8.57) defines the magnitude, τ, of some
torque vector, τ. But, what is the direction of this vector? By convention, if a
torque is such as to cause the object upon which it acts to twist about a certain
axis, then the direction of that torque runs along the direction of the axis in the
sense given by the right-hand grip rule. In other words, if the fingers of the right-
hand circulate around the axis of rotation in the sense in which the torque twists
the object, then the thumb of the right-hand points along the axis in the direction
of the torque. It follows that we can rewrite our rotational equation of motion,
Eq. (8.55), in vector form:
dω
I = I α = τ, (8.58)
dt
where α = dω/dt is the vector angular acceleration. Note that the direction of α
indicates the direction of the rotation axis about which the object accelerates (in
the sense given by the right-hand grip rule), whereas the direction of τ indicates
the direction of the rotation axis about which the torque attempts to twist the
object (in the sense given by the right-hand grip rule). Of course, these two
rotation axes are identical.
Although Eq. (8.58) was derived for the special case of a torque applied to a
ring rotating about a perpendicular symmetric axis, it is, nevertheless, completely
general.
Consider a rigid body which is free to pivot in any direction about some fixed
point O. Suppose that a force f is applied to the body at some point P whose
position vector relative to O is r. See Fig. 81. Let θ be the angle subtended
182
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.7 Torque
f
torque
θ
r
O
pivot
between the directions of r and f. What is the vector torque τ acting on the
object about an axis passing through the pivot point? The magnitude of this
torque is simply
τ = r f sin θ. (8.59)
In Fig. 81, the conventional direction of the torque is out of the page. Another
way of saying this is that the direction of the torque is mutually perpendicular
to both r and f, in the sense given by the right-hand grip rule when vector r is
rotated onto vector f (through an angle less than 180◦ degrees). It follows that
we can write
τ = r × f. (8.60)
In other words, the torque exerted by a force acting on a rigid body which pivots
about some fixed point is the vector product of the displacement of the point of
application of the force from the pivot point with the force itself. Equation (8.60)
specifies both the magnitude of the torque, and the axis of rotation about which
the torque twists the body upon which it acts. This axis runs parallel to the
direction of τ, and passes through the pivot point.
183
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.8 Power and work
Consider a mass m attached to the end of a light rod of length l whose other end
is attached to a fixed pivot. Suppose that the pivot is such that the rod is free
to rotate in any direction. Suppose, further, that a force f is applied to the mass,
whose instantaneous angular velocity about an axis of rotation passing through
the pivot is ω.
Let v be the instantaneous velocity of the mass. We know that the rate at which
the force f performs work on the mass—otherwise known as the power—is given
by (see Sect. 5.8)
P = f·v. (8.61)
However, we also know that (see Sect. 8.4)
v = ω × r, (8.62)
where r is the vector displacement of the mass from the pivot. Hence, we can
write
P =ω×r·f (8.63)
(note that a·b = b·a).
a × b · c = a · b × c. (8.64)
This theorem is easily proved by expanding the vector and scalar products in
component form using the definitions (8.11) and (8.13). It follows that Eq. (8.63)
can be rewritten
P = ω · r × f. (8.65)
However,
τ = r × f, (8.66)
where τ is the torque associated with force f about an axis of rotation passing
through the pivot. Hence, we obtain
P = τ·ω. (8.67)
184
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.8 Power and work
In other words, the rate at which a torque performs work on the object upon
which it acts is the scalar product of the torque and the angular velocity of the
object. Note the great similarity between Eq. (8.61) and Eq. (8.67).
dW = τ·dφ. (8.70)
Integration yields
W= τ·dφ. (8.71)
Note that this is a good definition, since it only involves an infinitesimal rotation
vector, dφ. Recall, from Sect. 8.3, that it is impossible to define a finite rotation
vector. For the case of translational motion, the analogous expression to the
above is
W = f·dr. (8.72)
Here, f is the force, and dr is an element of displacement of the body upon which
the force acts.
Although Eqs. (8.67) and (8.71) were derived for the special case of the ro-
tation of a mass attached to the end of a light rod, they are, nevertheless, com-
pletely general.
Consider, finally, the special case in which the torque is aligned with the an-
gular velocity, and both are constant in time. In this case, the rate at which the
torque performs work is simply
P = τ ω. (8.73)
185
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.9 Translational motion versus rotational motion
Force f = Ma Torque τ ≡ r × f = Iα
Work W = f·dr Work W = τ·dφ
Power P = f·v Power P = τ·ω
Kinetic energy K = M v /2 Kinetic energy
2
K = I ω2/2
Likewise, the net work performed by the torque in twisting the body upon which
it acts through an angle Δφ is just
W = τ Δφ. (8.74)
It should be clear, by now, that there is a strong analogy between rotational mo-
tion and standard translational motion. Indeed, each physical concept used to
analyze rotational motion has its translational concomitant. Likewise, every law
of physics governing rotational motion has a translational equivalent. The analo-
gies between rotational and translational motion are summarized in Table 3.
Baseball players know from experience that there is a “sweet spot” on a baseball
bat, about 17 cm from the end of the barrel, where the shock of impact with the
ball, as felt by the hands, is minimized. In fact, if the ball strikes the bat exactly
on the “sweet spot” then the hitter is almost unaware of the collision. Conversely,
if the ball strikes the bat well away from the “sweet spot” then the impact is felt
as a painful jarring of the hands.
186
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.10 The physics of baseball
pivot
J’ J’
bat
b
centre of mass
h
l v
ball
J J
The collision between the bat and the ball can be modeled as equal and oppo-
site impulses, J, applied to each object at the time of the collision (see Sect. 6.5).
At the same time, equal and opposite impulses J are applied to the pivot and the
bat, as shown in Fig. 82. If the pivot actually corresponds to a hitter’s hands then
the latter impulse gives rise to the painful jarring sensation felt when the ball is
not struck properly.
187
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.10 The physics of baseball
analyze the effect of the collision with the ball on the motion of the bat’s centre
of mass. The centre of mass of the bat acts like a point particle of mass M which
is subject to the two impulses, J and J (which are applied simultaneously). If v
is the instantaneous velocity of the centre of mass then the change in momentum
of this point due to the action of the two impulses is simply
M Δv = −J − J . (8.75)
The minus signs on the right-hand side of the above equation follow from the fact
that the impulses are oppositely directed to v in Fig. 82.
Consider the rotational motion of the bat shown in Fig. 82 about a perpendic-
ular (to the bat) axis passing through the pivot point. This motion satisfies
dω
I = τ, (8.76)
dt
where I is the moment of inertia of the bat, ω is its instantaneous angular velocity,
and τ is the applied torque. The bat is actually subject to an impulsive torque (i.e.,
a torque which only lasts for a short period in time) at the time of the collision
with the ball. Defining the angular impulse K associated with an impulsive torque
τ in much the same manner as we earlier defined the impulse associated with an
impulsive force (see Sect. 6.5), we obtain
t
K = τ dt. (8.77)
It follows that we can integrate Eq. (8.76) over the time of the collision to find
I Δω = K, (8.78)
188
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.10 The physics of baseball
where Δω is the change in angular velocity of the bat due to the collision with
the ball.
Now, the torque associated with a given force is equal to the magnitude of the
force times the length of the lever arm. Thus, it stands to reason that the angular
impulse, K, associated with an impulse, J, is simply
K = J x, (8.79)
where x is the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the impulse to the
axis of rotation. Hence, the angular impulses associated with the two impulses,
J and J , to which the bat is subject when it collides with the ball, are J h and 0,
respectively. The latter angular impulse is zero since the point of application of
the associated impulse coincides with the pivot point, and so the length of the
lever arm is zero. It follows that Eq. (8.78) can be written
I Δω = −J h. (8.80)
The minus sign comes from the fact that the impulse J is oppositely directed to
the angular velocity in Fig. 82.
Now, the relationship between the instantaneous velocity of the bat’s centre of
mass and the bat’s instantaneous angular velocity is simply
v = b ω. (8.81)
Hence, Eq. (8.75) can be rewritten
M b Δω = −J − J . (8.82)
Let us crudely model the bat as a uniform rod of length l and mass M. It
follows, by symmetry, that the centre of mass of the bat lies at its half-way point:
189
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
i.e.,
l
b= . (8.84)
2
Moreover, the moment of inertia of the bat about a perpendicular axis passing
through one of its ends is
1
I = M l2 (8.85)
3
(this is a standard result). Combining the previous three equations, we obtain
3h h
J =− 1− J=− 1− J, (8.86)
2l h0
where
2
h0 = l. (8.87)
3
Clearly, if h = h0 then no matter how hard the ball is hit (i.e., no matter how
large we make J) zero impulse is applied to the hitter’s hands. We conclude that
the “sweet spot”—or, in scientific terms, the centre of percussion—of a uniform
baseball bat lies two-thirds of the way down the bat from the hitter’s end. If
we adopt a more realistic model of a baseball bat, in which the bat is tapered
such that the majority of its weight is located at its hitting end, we can easily
demonstrate that the centre of percussion is shifted further away from the hitter
(i.e., it is more that two-thirds of the way along the bat).
In Sect. 4.7, we analyzed the motion of a block sliding down a frictionless incline.
We found that the block accelerates down the slope with uniform acceleration
g sin θ, where θ is the angle subtended by the incline with the horizontal. In this
case, all of the potential energy lost by the block, as it slides down the slope, is
converted into translational kinetic energy (see Sect. 5). In particular, no energy
is dissipated.
There is, of course, no way in which a block can slide over a frictional surface
without dissipating energy. However, we know from experience that a round
190
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
object can roll over such a surface with hardly any dissipation. For instance, it
is far easier to drag a heavy suitcase across the concourse of an airport if the
suitcase has wheels on the bottom. Let us investigate the physics of round objects
rolling over rough surfaces, and, in particular, rolling down rough inclines.
Consider, now, what happens when the cylinder shown in Fig. 83 rolls, with-
out slipping, down a rough slope whose angle of inclination, with respect to the
horizontal, is θ. If the cylinder starts from rest, and rolls down the slope a verti-
cal distance h, then its gravitational potential energy decreases by −ΔP = M g h,
where M is the mass of the cylinder. This decrease in potential energy must be
offset by a corresponding increase in kinetic energy. (Recall that when a cylin-
der rolls without slipping there is no frictional energy loss.) However, a rolling
cylinder can possesses two different types of kinetic energy. Firstly, translational
191
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
vt
centre of mass
cylinder
v
b
vt
surface
192
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
centre of mass
cylinder
f b
R
Mg
slope
as the cylinder falls is converted into rotational kinetic energy, whereas, in the
latter case, all of the released potential energy is converted into translational
kinetic energy. Note that, in both cases, the cylinder’s total kinetic energy at the
bottom of the incline is equal to the released potential energy.
193
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
Let us, now, examine the cylinder’s rotational equation of motion. First, we
must evaluate the torques associated with the three forces acting on the cylin-
der. Recall, that the torque associated with a given force is the product of the
magnitude of that force and the length of the level arm—i.e., the perpendicular
distance between the line of action of the force and the axis of rotation. Now, by
definition, the weight of an extended object acts at its centre of mass. However,
in this case, the axis of rotation passes through the centre of mass. Hence, the
length of the lever arm associated with the weight M g is zero. It follows that
the associated torque is also zero. It is clear, from Fig. 84, that the line of action
of the reaction force, R, passes through the centre of mass of the cylinder, which
coincides with the axis of rotation. Thus, the length of the lever arm associated
with R is zero, and so is the associated torque. Finally, according to Fig. 84, the
perpendicular distance between the line of action of the friction force, f, and the
axis of rotation is just the radius of the cylinder, b—so the associated torque is
f b. We conclude that the net torque acting on the cylinder is simply
τ = f b. (8.96)
It follows that the rotational equation of motion of the cylinder takes the form,
I ω̇ = τ = f b, (8.97)
where I is its moment of inertia, and ω̇ is its rotational acceleration.
Now, if the cylinder rolls, without slipping, such that the constraint (8.89) is
satisfied at all times, then the time derivative of this constraint implies the follow-
ing relationship between the cylinder’s translational and rotational accelerations:
v̇ = b ω̇. (8.98)
It follows from Eqs. (8.95) and (8.97) that
g sin θ
v̇ = , (8.99)
1 + I/M b2
194
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
M g sin θ
f = . (8.100)
1 + M b2 /I
Since the moment of inertia of the cylinder is actually I = (1/2) M b 2 , the above
expressions simplify to give
2
v̇ = g sin θ, (8.101)
3
and
1
f = M g sin θ. (8.102)
3
Note that the acceleration of a uniform cylinder as it rolls down a slope, without
slipping, is only two-thirds of the value obtained when the cylinder slides down
the same slope without friction. It is clear from Eq. (8.95) that, in the former
case, the acceleration of the cylinder down the slope is retarded by friction. Note,
however, that the frictional force merely acts to convert translational kinetic en-
ergy into rotational kinetic energy, and does not dissipate energy.
Now, in order for the slope to exert the frictional force specified in Eq. (8.102),
without any slippage between the slope and cylinder, this force must be less than
the maximum allowable static frictional force, μ R(= μ M g cos θ), where μ is the
coefficient of static friction. In other words, the condition for the cylinder to roll
down the slope without slipping is f < μ R, or
This condition is easily satisfied for gentle slopes, but may well be violated for ex-
tremely steep slopes (depending on the size of μ). Of course, the above condition
is always violated for frictionless slopes, for which μ = 0.
Suppose, finally, that we place two cylinders, side by side and at rest, at the top
of a frictional slope of inclination θ. Let the two cylinders possess the same mass,
M, and the same radius, b. However, suppose that the first cylinder is uniform,
whereas the second is a hollow shell. Which cylinder reaches the bottom of
the slope first, assuming that they are both released simultaneously, and both
roll without slipping? The acceleration of each cylinder down the slope is given
by Eq. (8.99). For the case of the solid cylinder, the moment of inertia is I =
195
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
(1/2) M b2 , and so
2
v̇solid =g sin θ. (8.104)
3
For the case of the hollow cylinder, the moment of inertia is I = M b2 (i.e., the
same as that of a ring with a similar mass, radius, and axis of rotation), and so
1
v̇hollow = g sin θ. (8.105)
2
It is clear that the solid cylinder reaches the bottom of the slope before the hollow
one (since it possesses the greater acceleration). Note that the accelerations of
the two cylinders are independent of their sizes or masses. This suggests that a
solid cylinder will always roll down a frictional incline faster than a hollow one,
irrespective of their relative dimensions (assuming that they both roll without
slipping). In fact, Eq. (8.99) suggests that whenever two different objects roll
(without slipping) down the same slope, then the most compact object—i.e., the
object with the smallest I/M b2 ratio—always wins the race.
Answer: The tire turns through φ = 5.3 × 2 π = 33.30 rad. in t = 2.3 s. The
relationship between φ and t for the case of rotational motion, starting from rest,
with uniform angular acceleration α is
1 2
φ= αt .
2
Hence,
2 φ 2 × 33.30
α= 2
= 2
= 12.59 rad./s2 .
t 2.3
196
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
Given that the tire starts from rest, its angular velocity after t seconds takes
the form
ω = α t = 12.59 × 2.3 = 28.96 rad./s.
Question: The net work done in accelerating a wheel from rest to an angular
speed of 30 rev./min. is W = 5500 J. What is the moment of inertia of the wheel?
Answer: The moment of inertia of a rod of mass M and length L about an axis,
perpendicular to its length, which passes through its midpoint is I = (1/12) M L 2 .
This is a standard result. Using the parallel axis theorem, the moment of inertia
about a parallel axis passing through one of the ends of the rod is
2
L 1
I =I+M = M L2 ,
2 3
197
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
so
3 × 1.22
I = = 1.44 kg m2 .
3
The instantaneous angular velocity of the rod is
π
ω = 60 × = 1.047 rad./s.
180
Hence, the rod’s rotational kinetic energy is written
1 2
K= I ω = 0.5 × 1.44 × 1.0472 = 0.789 J.
2
ω
T
weight
mg
Answer: Let v be the instantaneous downward velocity of the weight, ω the in-
stantaneous angular velocity of the pulley, and T the tension in the cable. Apply-
ing Newton’s second law to the vertical motion of the weight, we obtain
m v̇ = m g − T.
198
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
Question: A uniform rod of mass m = 5.3 kg and length l = 1.3 m rotates about a
fixed frictionless pivot located at one of its ends. The rod is released from rest at
199
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
an angle θ = 35◦ beneath the horizontal. What is the angular acceleration of the
rod immediately after it is released?
x
pivot
θ
l/2
rod
l
mg
Answer: The moment of inertia of a rod of mass m and length l about an axis,
perpendicular to its length, which passes through one of its ends is I = (1/3) m l 2
(see question 8.3). Hence,
5.3 × 1.32
I= = 2.986 kg m2 .
3
The angular equation of motion of the rod is
I α = τ,
where α is the rod’s angular acceleration, and τ is the net torque exerted on the
rod. Now, the only force acting on the rod (whose line of action does not pass
through the pivot) is the rod’s weight, m g. This force acts at the centre of mass
of the rod, which is situated at the rod’s midpoint. The perpendicular distance x
between the line of action of the weight and the pivot point is simply
l 1.3 × cos 35◦
x = cos θ = = 0.532 m.
2 2
Thus, the torque acting on the rod is
τ = m g x.
It follows that the rod’s angular acceleration is written
τ m g x 5.3 × 9.81 × 0.532
α= = = = 9.26 rad./s2 .
I I 2.986
200
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
Question: A car engine develops a torque of τ = 500 N m and rotates at 3000 rev./min..
What horsepower does the engine generate? (1 hp = 746 W).
Answer: Let v be the velocity of the cylinder’s centre of mass, ω the cylinder’s
angular velocity, f the frictional force exerted by the surface on the cylinder, M
the cylinder’s mass, and I the cylinder’s moment of inertia. The cylinder’s trans-
lational equation of motion is written
M v̇ = f.
Note that the friction force acts to accelerate the cylinder’s translational motion.
Likewise, the cylinder’s rotational equation of motion takes the form
I ω̇ = −f b,
201
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
cylinder
b v
surface
since the perpendicular distance between the line of action of f and the axis
of rotation is the radius, b, of the cylinder. Note that the friction force acts to
decelerate the cylinder’s rotational motion. If the cylinder is slipping with respect
to the surface, then the friction force, f, is equal to the coefficient of friction, μ,
times the normal reaction, M g, at the surface:
f = μ M g.
Finally, the moment of inertia of the cylinder is
1
I= M b2 .
2
Now, the cylinder stops slipping as soon as the “no slip” condition,
v = b ω,
202
8 ROTATIONAL MOTION 8.11 Combined translational and rotational motion
203
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM
9 Angular momentum
9.1 Introduction
Two physical quantities are noticeable by their absence in Table 3. Namely, mo-
mentum, and its rotational concomitant angular momentum. It turns out that
angular momentum is a sufficiently important concept to merit a separate discus-
sion.
204
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.2 Angular momentum of a point particle
l = r p sin θ
p
l particle
origin r
O
Figure 85: Angular momentum of a point particle about the origin.
For the special case of a particle of mass m executing a circular orbit of ra-
dius r, with instantaneous velocity v and instantaneous angular velocity ω, the
magnitude of the particle’s angular momentum is simply
l = m v r = m ω r2 . (9.9)
205
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.3 Angular momentum of an extended object
Consider a rigid object rotating about some fixed axis with angular velocity ω.
Let us model this object as a swarm of N particles. Suppose that the ith particle
has mass mi , position vector ri , and velocity vi . Incidentally, it is assumed that
the object’s axis of rotation passes through the origin of our coordinate system.
The total angular momentum of the object, L, is simply the vector sum of the
angular momenta of the N particles from which it is made up. Hence,
L= mi ri × vi . (9.10)
i=1,N
Now, for a rigidly rotating object we can write (see Sect. 8.4)
vi = ω × r i . (9.11)
Let
ω = ω k, (9.12)
where k is a unit vector pointing along the object’s axis of rotation (in the sense
given by the right-hand grip rule). It follows that
L=ω mi ri × (k × ri ). (9.13)
i=1,N
Let us calculate the component of L along the object’s rotation axis—i.e., the
component along the k axis. We can write
Lk = L · k = ω mi k · ri × (k × ri ). (9.14)
i=1,N
Now,
mi |k × ri |2 = Ik , (9.16)
i=1,N
206
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.3 Angular momentum of an extended object
where Ik is the moment of inertia of the object about the k axis. (see Sect. 8.6).
Hence, it follows that
Lk = Ik ω. (9.17)
According to the above formula, the component of a rigid body’s angular mo-
mentum vector along its axis of rotation is simply the product of the body’s mo-
ment of inertia about this axis and the body’s angular velocity. Does this result
imply that we can automatically write
L = I ω? (9.18)
Unfortunately, in general, the answer to the above question is no! This conclusion
follows because the body may possess non-zero angular momentum components
about axes perpendicular to its axis of rotation. Thus, in general, the angular
momentum vector of a rotating body is not parallel to its angular velocity vector.
This is a major difference from translational motion, where linear momentum is
always found to be parallel to linear velocity.
Lx = Ix ωx , (9.19)
Ly = Iy ωy , (9.20)
Lz = Iz ωz , (9.21)
where Ix is the moment of inertia of the object about the x-axis, etc. Here, it is
again assumed that the origin of our coordinate system lies on the object’s axis
of rotation. Note that the above equations are only valid when the x-, y-, and
z-axes are aligned in a certain very special manner—in fact, they must be aligned
along the so-called principal axes of the object (these axes invariably coincide
with the object’s main symmetry axes). Note that it is always possible to find
three, mutually perpendicular, principal axes of rotation which pass through a
given point in a rigid body. Reconstructing L from its components, we obtain
^ + I y ωy y
L = I x ωx x ^ + Iz ωz ^z, (9.22)
207
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.3 Angular momentum of an extended object
where x ^ is a unit vector pointing along the x-axis, etc. It is clear, from the above
equation, that the reason L is not generally parallel to ω is because the moments
of inertia of a rigid object about its different possible axes of rotation are not
generally the same. In other words, if Ix = Iy = Iz = I then L = I ω, and the
angular momentum and angular velocity vectors are always parallel. However, if
Ix = Iy = Iz , which is usually the case, then L is not, in general, parallel to ω.
Although Eq. (9.22) suggests that the angular momentum of a rigid object is
not generally parallel to its angular velocity, this equation also implies that there
are, at least, three special axes of rotation for which this is the case. Suppose, for
instance, that the object rotates about the z-axis, so that ω = ω z ^z. It follows
from Eq. (9.22) that
L = Iz ωz ^z = Iz ω. (9.23)
Thus, in this case, the angular momentum vector is parallel to the angular velocity
vector. The same can be said for rotation about the x- or y- axes. We conclude
that when a rigid object rotates about one of its principal axes then its angular
momentum is parallel to its angular velocity, but not, in general, otherwise.
How can we identify a principal axis of a rigid object? At the simplest level,
a principal axis is one about which the object possesses axial symmetry. The
required type of symmetry is illustrated in Fig. 86. Assuming that the object
can be modeled as a swarm of particles—for every particle of mass m, located
a distance r from the origin, and subtending an angle θ with the rotation axis,
there must be an identical particle located on diagrammatically the opposite side
of the rotation axis. As shown in the diagram, the angular momentum vectors
of such a matched pair of particles can be added together to form a resultant
angular momentum vector which is parallel to the axis of rotation. Thus, if the
object is composed entirely of matched particle pairs then its angular momentum
vector must be parallel to its angular velocity vector. The generalization of this
argument to deal with continuous objects is fairly straightforward. For instance,
symmetry implies that any axis of rotation which passes through the centre of a
uniform sphere is a principal axis of that object. Likewise, a perpendicular axis
which passes through the centre of a uniform disk is a principal axis. Finally, a
perpendicular axis which passes through the centre of a uniform rod is a principal
axis.
208
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
axis of rotation
ω
l1 l2 l2
v1 v2 l
m m l1
r θ θ r
Let us assume that the internal forces acting within the system are central forces—
i.e., the force fij , acting between particles i and j, is directed along the line of
centres of these particles. See Fig. 87. In other words,
209
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
f Fi
ij
mi
line of centres
ri Fj
mj
rj f
ji
Taking the vector product of this equation with the position vector r i , we obtain
j=i
ri × ṗi = ri × fij + ri × Fi . (9.27)
j=1,N
210
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
Consider the first expression on the right-hand side of Eq. (9.30). A general
term, ri × fij , in this sum can always be paired with a matching term, rj × fji , in
which the indices have been swapped. Making use of Eq. (9.24), the sum of a
general matched pair can be written
However, if the internal forces are central in nature then fij is parallel to (ri − rj ).
Hence, the vector product of these two vectors is zero. We conclude that
for any values of i and j. Thus, the first expression on the right-hand side of
Eq. (9.30) sums to zero. We are left with
dL
= τ, (9.33)
dt
where
τ= ri × Fi (9.34)
i=1,N
is the net external torque acting on the system (about an axis passing through
the origin). Of course, Eq. (9.33) is simply the rotational equation of motion for
the system taken as a whole.
Suppose that the system is isolated, such that it is subject to zero net external
torque. It follows from Eq. (9.33) that, in this case, the total angular momentum
of the system is a conserved quantity. To be more exact, the components of the to-
tal angular momentum taken about any three independent axes are individually
conserved quantities. Conservation of angular momentum is an extremely useful
concept which greatly simplifies the analysis of a wide range of rotating systems.
Let us consider some examples.
Suppose that two identical weights of mass m are attached to a light rigid rod
which rotates without friction about a perpendicular axis passing through its mid-
point. Imagine that the two weights are equipped with small motors which allow
them to travel along the rod: the motors are synchronized in such a manner that
the distance of the two weights from the axis of rotation is always the same. Let
211
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
axle
m m
d d
rod weight
us call this common distance d, and let ω be the angular velocity of the rod. See
Fig. 88. How does the angular velocity ω change as the distance d is varied?
Note that there are no external torques acting on the system. It follows that the
system’s angular momentum must remain constant as the weights move along the
rod. Neglecting the contribution of the rod, the moment of inertia of the system
is written
I = 2 m d2 . (9.35)
Since the system is rotating about a principal axis, its angular momentum takes
the form
L = I ω = 2 m d2 ω. (9.36)
If L is a constant of the motion then we obtain
ω d2 = constant. (9.37)
In other words, the system spins faster as the weights move inwards towards the
axis of rotation, and vice versa. This effect is familiar from figure skating. When
a skater spins about a vertical axis, her angular momentum is approximately a
conserved quantity, since the ice exerts very little torque on her. Thus, if the
skater starts spinning with outstretched arms, and then draws her arms inwards,
then her rate of rotation will spontaneously increase in order to conserve angular
momentum. The skater can slow her rate of rotation by simply pushing her arms
outwards again.
212
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
bullet
M
v b
m
d
pivot
rod
Suppose that a bullet of mass m and velocity v strikes, and becomes embedded
in, a stationary rod of mass M and length 2 b which pivots about a frictionless
perpendicular axle passing through its mid-point. Let the bullet strike the rod
normally a distance d from its axis of rotation. See Fig. 89. What is the instanta-
neous angular velocity ω of the rod (and bullet) immediately after the collision?
Taking the bullet and the rod as a whole, this is again a system upon which
no external torque acts. Thus, we expect the system’s net angular momentum to
be the same before and after the collision. Before the collision, only the bullet
possesses angular momentum, since the rod is at rest. As is easily demonstrated,
the bullet’s angular momentum about the pivot point is
l = mvd : (9.38)
i.e., the product of its mass, its velocity, and its distance of closest approach to the
point about which the angular momentum is measured—this is a general result
(for a point particle). After the collision, the bullet lodges a distance d from the
pivot, and is forced to co-rotate with the rod. Hence, the angular momentum of
the bullet after the collision is given by
l = m d2 ω, (9.39)
where ω is the angular velocity of the rod. The angular momentum of the rod
after the collision is
L = I ω, (9.40)
213
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
θ
v
d r r
O ground
214
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
Answer: Neglecting any friction between the skates and the ice, we expect the
skater to spin with constant angular momentum. The skater’s initial angular
momentum is
L1 = I1 ω1 ,
where I1 is the skater’s initial moment of inertia. The skater’s final angular mo-
mentum is
L2 = I2 ω2 ,
where I2 is the skater’s final moment of inertia, and ω2 is her final angular veloc-
ity. Conservation of angular momentum yields L1 = L2 , or
I1
ω2 = ω2 .
I2
215
9 ANGULAR MOMENTUM 9.4 Angular momentum of a multi-component system
ω2 = 8 × 11 = 88 rad./s.
216
10 STATICS
10 Statics
10.1 Introduction
Probably the most useful application of the laws of mechanics is the study of situ-
ations in which nothing moves—this discipline is known as statics. The principles
of statics are employed by engineers whenever they design stationary structures,
such as buildings, bridges, and tunnels, in order to ensure that these structures
do not collapse.
is the resultant of all the external forces acting on the system. Note that F i is the
external force acting on the ith component of the system.
217
10 STATICS 10.2 The principles of statics
What conditions must be satisfied by the various external forces and torques
acting on the system if it is to remain stationary in time? Well, if the system
does not evolve in time then its net linear momentum, P, and its net angular
momentum, L, must both remain constant. In other words, dP/dt = dL/dt = 0.
It follows from Eqs. (10.1) and (10.3) that
F = 0, (10.5)
τ = 0. (10.6)
In other words, the net external force acting on system must be zero, and the net
external torque acting on the system must be zero. To be more exact:
The components of the net external force acting along any three independent
directions must all be zero;
and
The magnitudes of the net external torques acting about any three indepen-
dent axes (passing through the origin of the coordinate system) must all be
zero.
218
10 STATICS 10.2 The principles of statics
It is clear that the above principles are necessary conditions for a general phys-
ical system not to evolve in time. But, are they also sufficient conditions? In other
words, is it necessarily true that a general system which satisfies these conditions
does not exhibit any time variation? The answer to this question is as follows: if
the system under investigation is a rigid body, such that the motion of any com-
ponent of the body necessarily implies the motion of the whole body, then the
above principles are necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of an
equilibrium state. On the other hand, if the system is not a rigid body, so that
some components of the body can move independently of others, then the above
conditions only guarantee that the system remains static in an average sense.
219
10 STATICS 10.3 Equilibrium of a laminar object in a gravitational field
Fi = mi g, (10.11)
Consider a general laminar object which is free to pivot about a fixed perpendic-
ular axis. Assuming that the object is placed in a uniform gravitational field (such
as that on the surface of the Earth), what is the object’s equilibrium configuration
in this field?
Let O represent the pivot point, and let C be the centre of mass of the ob-
ject. See Fig. 90. Suppose that r represents the distance between points O and
C, whereas θ is the angle subtended between the line OC and the downward
220
10 STATICS 10.3 Equilibrium of a laminar object in a gravitational field
d
O
θ r
h
Mg
Figure 90: A laminar object pivoting about a fixed point in a gravitational field.
vertical. There are two external forces acting on the object. First, there is the
downward force, M g, due to gravity, which acts at the centre of mass. Second,
there is the reaction, R, due to the pivot, which acts at the pivot point. Here, M
is the mass of the object, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Two conditions must be satisfied in order for a given configuration of the object
shown in Fig. 90 to represent an equilibrium configuration. First, there must be
zero net external force acting on the object. This implies that the reaction, R, is
equal and opposite to the gravitational force, M g. In other words, the reaction
is of magnitude M g and is directed vertically upwards. The second condition
is that there must be zero net torque acting about the pivot point. Now, the
reaction, R, does not generate a torque, since it acts at the pivot point. Moreover,
the torque associated with the gravitational force, M g, is simply the magnitude
of this force times the length of the lever arm, d (see Fig. 90). Hence, the net
torque acting on the system about the pivot point is
τ = M g d = M g r sin θ. (10.13)
221
10 STATICS 10.3 Equilibrium of a laminar object in a gravitational field
Incidentally, we can use the above result to experimentally determine the cen-
tre of mass of a given laminar object. We would need to suspend the object from
two different pivot points, successively. In each equilibrium configuration, we
would mark a line running vertically downward from the pivot point, using a
plumb-line. The crossing point of these two lines would indicate the position of
the centre of mass.
U = −M g h = −M g r cos θ. (10.14)
(Note that the gravitational potential energy of an extended object can be calcu-
lated by imagining that all of the mass of the object is concentrated at its centre
of mass.) It can be seen that θ = 0◦ corresponds to a minimum of this poten-
tial, whereas θ = 180◦ corresponds to a maximum. This is in accordance with
Sect. 5.7, where it was demonstrated that whenever an object moves in a con-
servative force-field (such as a gravitational field), the stable equilibrium points
correspond to minima of the potential energy associated with this field, whereas
the unstable equilibrium points correspond to maxima.
222
10 STATICS 10.4 Rods and cables
Let us first locate the centre of mass of the rod, which is situated at the rod’s
mid-point, a distance l/2 from reference point A (see Fig. 91). There are three
forces acting on the rod: the gravitational force, M g, and the two tension forces,
T1 and T2 . Each of these forces is directed vertically. Thus, the condition that zero
net force acts on the system reduces to the condition that the net vertical force is
zero, which yields
T1 + T2 − M g = 0. (10.15)
Consider the torques exerted by the three above-mentioned forces about point
A. Each of these torques attempts to twist the rod about an axis perpendicular
to the plane of the diagram. Hence, the condition that zero net torque acts on
the system reduces to the condition that the net torque at point A, about an
axis perpendicular to the plane of the diagram, is zero. The contribution of each
force to this torque is simply the product of the magnitude of the force and the
length of the associated lever arm. In each case, the length of the lever arm is
equivalent to the distance of the point of action of the force from A, measured
along the length of the rod. Hence, setting the net torque to zero, we obtain
l
x 1 T1 + x 2 T2 − M g = 0. (10.16)
2
Note that the torque associated with the gravitational force, M g, has a minus sign
in front, because this torque obviously attempts to twist the rod in the opposite
direction to the torques associated with the tensions in the cables.
223
10 STATICS 10.4 Rods and cables
x2
x1 T1 T2
A
l/2
Mg
Consider a uniform rod of mass M and length l which is free to rotate in the
vertical plane about a fixed pivot attached to one of its ends. The other end of
the rod is attached to a fixed cable. We can imagine that both the pivot and the
cable are anchored in the same vertical wall. See Fig. 92. Suppose that the rod is
level, and that the cable subtends an angle θ with the horizontal. Assuming that
the rod is in equilibrium, what is the magnitude of the tension, T , in the cable,
and what is the direction and magnitude of the reaction, R, at the pivot?
224
10 STATICS 10.4 Rods and cables
wall
cable
pivot T
R
φ θ
l
Mg
rod
As usual, the centre of mass of the rod lies at its mid-point. There are three
forces acting on the rod: the reaction, R; the weight, M g; and the tension, T .
The reaction acts at the pivot. Let φ be the angle subtended by the reaction with
the horizontal, as shown in Fig. 92. The weight acts at the centre of mass of the
rod, and is directed vertically downwards. Finally, the tension acts at the end of
the rod, and is directed along the cable.
Resolving horizontally, and setting the net horizontal force acting on the rod
to zero, we obtain
R cos φ − T cos θ = 0. (10.21)
Likewise, resolving vertically, and setting the net vertical force acting on the rod
to zero, we obtain
R sin φ + T sin θ − M g = 0. (10.22)
The above constraints are sufficient to ensure that zero net force acts on the rod.
Let us evaluate the net torque acting at the pivot point (about an axis perpen-
dicular to the plane of the diagram). The reaction, R, does not contribute to this
torque, since it acts at the pivot point. The length of the lever arm associated
with the weight, M g, is l/2. Simple trigonometry reveals that the length of the
lever arm associated with the tension, T , is l sin θ. Hence, setting the net torque
225
10 STATICS 10.5 Ladders and walls
One important point to note about the above solution is that if φ = θ then the
lines of action of the three forces—R, M g, and T —intersect at the same point,
as shown in Fig. 92. This is an illustration of a general rule. Namely, whenever a
rigid body is in equilibrium under the action of three forces, then these forces are
either mutually parallel, as shown in Fig. 91, or their lines of action pass through
the same point, as shown in Fig. 92.
Suppose that a ladder of length l and negligible mass is leaning against a vertical
wall, making an angle θ with the horizontal. A workman of mass M climbs
226
10 STATICS 10.5 Ladders and walls
wall
S ladder
workman
x R
l
Mg ground
θ
f
a distance x along the ladder, measured from the bottom. See Fig. 93. Suppose
that the wall is completely frictionless, but that the ground possesses a coefficient
of static friction μ. How far up the ladder can the workman climb before it slips
along the ground? Is it possible for the workman to climb to the top of the ladder
without any slippage occurring?
There are four forces acting on the ladder: the weight, M g, of the workman;
the reaction, S, at the wall; the reaction, R, at the ground; and the frictional
force, f, due to the ground. The weight acts at the position of the workman, and
is directed vertically downwards. The reaction, S, acts at the top of the ladder,
and is directed horizontally (i.e., normal to the surface of the wall). The reaction,
R, acts at the bottom of the ladder, and is directed vertically upwards (i.e., normal
to the ground). Finally, the frictional force, f, also acts at the bottom of the ladder,
and is directed horizontally.
Resolving horizontally, and setting the net horizontal force acting on the ladder
to zero, we obtain
S − f = 0. (10.28)
Resolving vertically, and setting the net vertically force acting on the ladder to
zero, we obtain
R − M g = 0. (10.29)
Evaluating the torque acting about the point where the ladder touches the ground,
we note that only the forces M g and S contribute. The lever arm associated with
the force M g is x cos θ. The lever arm associated with the force S is l sin θ. Fur-
227
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
thermore, the torques associated with these two forces act in opposite directions.
Hence, setting the net torque about the bottom of the ladder to zero, we obtain
R = M g, (10.31)
and
x
f=S= M g. (10.32)
l tan θ
Now, the condition for the ladder not to slip with respect to the ground is
f < μ R. (10.33)
Suppose that three identical uniform rods of mass M and length l are joined
together to form an equilateral triangle, and are then suspended from a cable, as
shown in Fig. 94. What is the tension in the cable, and what are the reactions at
the joints?
Let X1 , X2 , and X3 be the horizontal reactions at the three joints, and let Y1 , Y2 ,
and Y3 be the corresponding vertical reactions, as shown in Fig. 94. In drawing
this diagram, we have made use of the fact that the rods exert equal and opposite
228
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
cable
Y1 Y3
T
A l B
X1 X3
X1 X3
θ θ
Mg
Y1 Y3
Y2
rod θ
Mg Mg
X2 X2
C
Y2
reactions on one another, in accordance with Newton’s third law. Let T be the
tension in the cable.
Setting the horizontal and vertical forces acting on rod AB to zero, we obtain
X1 − X3 = 0, (10.36)
T + Y1 + Y3 − M g = 0, (10.37)
respectively. Setting the horizontal and vertical forces acting on rod AC to zero,
we obtain
X2 − X1 = 0, (10.38)
Y2 − Y1 − M g = 0, (10.39)
respectively. Finally, setting the horizontal and vertical forces acting on rod BC
to zero, we obtain
X3 − X2 = 0, (10.40)
−Y2 − Y3 − M g = 0, (10.41)
respectively. Incidentally, it is clear, from symmetry, that X1 = X3 and Y1 = Y3 .
Thus, the above equations can be solved to give
T = 3 M g, (10.42)
229
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
Y2 = 0, (10.43)
X1 = X2 = X3 = X, (10.44)
Y1 = Y3 = −M g. (10.45)
Now, it is clear, from symmetry, that there is zero net torque acting on rod AB.
Let us evaluate the torque acting on rod AC about point A. (By symmetry, this is
the same as the torque acting on rod BC about point B). The two forces which
contribute to this torque are the weight, M g, and the reaction X2 = X. (Recall
that the reaction Y2 is zero). The lever arms associated with these two torques
(which act in the same direction) are (l/2) cos θ and l sin θ, respectively. Thus,
setting the net torque to zero, we obtain
which yields
Mg Mg
X=− =− √ , (10.47)
2 tan θ 2 3
√
since θ = 60◦ , and tan 60◦ = 3. We have now fully determined the tension in
the cable, and all the reactions at the joints.
Question: Suppose that two uniform rods (of negligible thickness) are welded
together at right-angles, as shown in the diagram below. Let the first rod be
of mass m1 = 5.2 kg and length l1 = 1.3 m. Let the second rod be of mass
m2 = 3.4 kg and length l2 = 0.7 m. Suppose that the system is suspended from
a pivot point located at the free end of the first rod, and then allowed to reach
a stable equilibrium state. What angle θ does the first rod subtend with the
downward vertical in this state?
Answer: Let us adopt a coordinate system in which the x-axis runs parallel to the
second rod, whereas the y-axis runs parallel to the first. Let the origin of our
230
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
pivot
x
y
l1
l2
coordinate system correspond to the pivot point. The centre of mass of the first
rod is situated at its mid-point, whose coordinates are
Likewise, the centre of mass of the second rod is situated at its mid-point, whose
coordinates are
(x2 , y2 ) = (l2 /2, l1 ).
It follows that the coordinates of the centre of mass of the whole system are given
by
m1 x1 + m2 x2 1 m2 l2 3.4 × 0.7
xcm = = = = 0.138 m,
m1 + m2 2 m1 + m2 2 × 8.6
and
m1 y1 + m2 y2 m1 l1 /2 + m2 l1 5.2 × 1.3/2 + 3.4 × 1.3
ycm = = = = 0.907 m.
m1 + m2 m1 + m2 8.6
The angle θ subtended between the line joining the pivot point and the overall
centre of mass, and the first rod is simply
−1 xcm
θ = tan = tan−1 0.152 = 8.65◦ .
ycm
When the system reaches a stable equilibrium state then its centre of mass is
aligned directly below the pivot point. This implies that the first rod subtends an
angle θ = 8.65◦ with the downward vertical.
231
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
rod θ
pin l1
cable
l2
m1 m2
l
Answer: Consider the torque acting on the rod about the pin. Note that the
reaction at the pin makes no contribution to this torque (since the length of the
associated lever arm is zero). The torque due to the weight of the rod is m g l/2
(i.e., the weight times the length of the lever arm). Note that the weight of the
rod acts at its centre of mass, which is located at the rod’s mid-point. The torque
due to the weight of the first mass is m1 g l1 . The torque due to the weight of
the second mass is m2 g l2 . Finally, the torque due to the tension in the cable is
−T l sin θ (this torque is negative since it twists the rod in the opposite sense to
the other three torques). Hence, setting the net torque to zero, we obtain
l
mg + m1 g l1 + m2 g l2 − T l sin θ = 0,
2
or
[m/2 + m1 (l1 /l) + m2 (l2 /l)] g
T =
sin θ
[0.5 × 15 + 36 × (0.5/3) + 24 × (2.3/3)] × 9.81
=
sin 40◦
= 486.84 N.
232
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
S ladder
person
l x R
Mg ground
mg θ
f
Answer: The angle θ subtended by the ladder with the ground satisfies
θ = cos−1 (d/l) = cos−1 (1.2/10) = 83.11◦ .
Let S be the normal reaction at the wall, let R be the normal reaction at the
ground, and let f be the frictional force exerted by the ground on the ladder,
as shown in the diagram. Consider the torque acting on the ladder about the
point where it meets the ground. Only three forces contribute to this torque:
the weight, m g, of the ladder, which acts half-way along the ladder; the weight,
M g, of the person, which acts a distance x along the ladder; and the reaction, S,
at the wall, which acts at the top of the ladder. The lever arms associated with
these three forces are (l/2) cos θ, x cos θ, and l sin θ, respectively. Note that the
reaction force acts to twist the ladder in the opposite sense to the two weights.
Hence, setting the net torque to zero, we obtain
l
mg cos θ + M g x cos θ − S l sin θ = 0,
2
233
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
which yields
(m g/2 + M g x/l) (0.5 × 40 × 9.81 + 80 × 9.81 × 7/10)
S= = = 90.09 N.
tan θ tan 83.11◦
The condition that zero net vertical force acts on the ladder yields
R − m g − M g = 0.
Hence,
R = (m + M) g = (40 + 80) × 9.81 = 1177.2 N.
Mg mg bridge
Answer: Let R and S be the reactions at the bridge supports. Here, R is the
reaction at the support closest to the truck. Setting the net vertical force acting
on the bridge to zero, we obtain
R + S − M g − m g = 0.
Setting the torque acting on the bridge about the left-most support to zero, we
get
M g l/3 + m g l/2 − S l = 0.
234
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
Here, we have made use of the fact that centre of mass of the bridge lies at its
mid-point. It follows from the above two equations that
S = M g/3 + m g/2 = 5000 × 9.81/3 + 1000 × 9.81/2 = 2.13 × 104 N,
and
R = M g + m g − S = (5000 + 1000) × 9.81 − 2.13 × 104 = 3.76 × 104 N.
X2 mg Y3 X3
Y2 strut
wall
Answer: Let us call the vertical reactions at the joints X1 , X2 , and X3 . Let the
corresponding horizontal reactions be Y1 , Y2 , and Y3 . See the diagram. Here, we
have made use of the fact that the strut and the rod exert equal and opposite
reactions on one another, in accordance with Newton’s third law. Setting the net
vertical force on the rod to zero yields
X1 + X3 − m g = 0.
235
10 STATICS 10.6 Jointed rods
Setting the net torque acting on the rod about the point where it is connected
to the wall to zero, we obtain
m g l/2 − X3 l = 0,
where l is the length of the rod. Here, we have used the fact that the centre of
gravity of the rod lies at its mid-point. The above equation implies that
X3 = X = m g/2 = 15 × 9.81/2 = 73.58 N.
We also have X1 = m g − X = 73.58 N. Setting the net torque acting on the strut
about the point where it is connected to the wall to zero, we find
Y3 h sin θ − X3 h cos θ = 0,
where h is the length of the strut. Thus,
X 73.58
Y3 = Y = = = 127.44 N.
tan θ tan 30◦
236
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION
11 Oscillatory motion
11.1 Introduction
We have seen previously (for instance, in Sect. 10.3) that when systems are per-
turbed from a stable equilibrium state they experience a restoring force which acts
to return them to that state. In many cases of interest, the magnitude of the
restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. In
this section, we shall investigate the motion of systems subject to such a force.
Let us reexamine the problem of a mass on a spring (see Sect. 5.6). Consider
a mass m which slides over a horizontal frictionless surface. Suppose that the
mass is attached to a light horizontal spring whose other end is anchored to an
immovable object. See Fig. 42. Let x be the extension of the spring: i.e., the dif-
ference between the spring’s actual length and its unstretched length. Obviously,
x can also be used as a coordinate to determine the horizontal displacement of
the mass.
The equilibrium state of the system corresponds to the situation where the
mass is at rest, and the spring is unextended (i.e., x = 0). In this state, zero net
force acts on the mass, so there is no reason for it to start to move. If the system
is perturbed from this equilibrium state (i.e., if the mass is moved, so that the
spring becomes extended) then the mass experiences a restoring force given by
Hooke’s law:
f = −k x. (11.1)
Here, k > 0 is the force constant of the spring. The negative sign indicates that
f is indeed a restoring force. Note that the magnitude of the restoring force
is directly proportional to the displacement of the system from equilibrium (i.e.,
f ∝ x). Of course, Hooke’s law only holds for small spring extensions. Hence,
the displacement from equilibrium cannot be made too large. The motion of this
237
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.2 Simple harmonic motion
system is representative of the motion of a wide range of systems when they are
slightly disturbed from a stable equilibrium state.
Newton’s second law gives following equation of motion for the system:
m ẍ = −k x. (11.2)
This differential equation is known as the simple harmonic equation, and its solu-
tion has been known for centuries. In fact, the solution is
where a, ω, and φ are constants. We can demonstrate that Eq. (11.3) is in-
deed a solution of Eq. (11.2) by direct substitution. Substituting Eq. (11.3) into
Eq. (11.2), and recalling from calculus that d(cos θ)/dθ = − sin θ and d(sin θ)/dθ =
cos θ, we obtain
Figure 95 shows a graph of x versus t obtained from Eq. (11.3). The type
of motion shown here is called simple harmonic motion. It can be seen that the
displacement x oscillates between x = −a and x = +a. Here, a is termed the
amplitude of the oscillation. Moreover, the motion is periodic in time (i.e., it
repeats exactly after a certain time period has elapsed). In fact, the period is
2π
T= . (11.6)
ω
This result is easily obtained from Eq. (11.3) by noting that cos θ is a periodic
function of θ with period 2 π. The frequency of the motion (i.e., the number of
oscillations completed per second) is
1 ω
f= = . (11.7)
T 2π
238
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.2 Simple harmonic motion
It can be seen that ω is the motion’s angular frequency (i.e., the frequency f
converted into radians per second). Finally, the phase angle φ determines the
times at which the oscillation attains its maximum amplitude, x = a: in fact,
φ
tmax =T n+ . (11.8)
2π
Here, n is an arbitrary integer.
Table 4 lists the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of the mass at various
phases of the simple harmonic cycle. The information contained in this table can
easily be derived from the simple harmonic equation, Eq. (11.3). Note that all
of the non-zero values shown in this table represent either the maximum or the
minimum value taken by the quantity in question during the oscillation cycle.
239
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.2 Simple harmonic motion
executes simple harmonic motion about its equilibrium state. In physical terms,
if the initial displacement is positive (x > 0) then the restoring force overcom-
pensates, and sends the system past the equilibrium state (x = 0) to negative
displacement states (x < 0). The restoring force again overcompensates, and
sends the system back through x = 0 to positive displacement states. The motion
then repeats itself ad infinitum. The frequency of the oscillation is determined by
the spring stiffness, k, and the system inertia, m, via Eq. (11.5). In contrast, the
amplitude and phase angle of the oscillation are determined by the initial condi-
tions. Suppose that the instantaneous displacement and velocity of the mass at
t = 0 are x0 and v0 , respectively. It follows from Eq. (11.3) that
Here, use has been made of the well-known identities cos(−θ) = cos θ and
sin(−θ) = − sin θ. Hence, we obtain
a = x02 + (v0 /ω)2 , (11.11)
and
−1 v0
φ = tan , (11.12)
ω x0
since sin2 θ + cos2 θ = 1 and tan θ = sin θ/ cos θ.
1 2 m a2 ω2 sin2 (ω t − φ)
K = m ẋ = . (11.13)
2 2
Recall, from Sect. 5.6, that the potential energy takes the form
1 2 k a2 cos2 (ω t − φ)
U= kx = . (11.14)
2 2
Hence, the total energy can be written
a2 k
E=K+U= , (11.15)
2
240
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.3 The torsion pendulum
fixed support
torsion wire
disk
since m ω2 = k and sin2 θ + cos2 θ = 1. Note that the total energy is a constant of
the motion, as expected for an isolated system. Moreover, the energy is propor-
tional to the amplitude squared of the motion. It is clear, from the above expres-
sions, that simple harmonic motion is characterized by a constant backward and
forward flow of energy between kinetic and potential components. The kinetic
energy attains its maximum value, and the potential energy attains it minimum
value, when the displacement is zero (i.e., when x = 0). Likewise, the potential
energy attains its maximum value, and the kinetic energy attains its minimum
value, when the displacement is maximal (i.e., when x = ±a). Note that the
minimum value of K is zero, since the system is instantaneously at rest when the
displacement is maximal.
Consider a disk suspended from a torsion wire attached to its centre. See Fig. 96.
This setup is known as a torsion pendulum. A torsion wire is essentially inexten-
sible, but is free to twist about its axis. Of course, as the wire twists it also causes
the disk attached to it to rotate in the horizontal plane. Let θ be the angle of
rotation of the disk, and let θ = 0 correspond to the case in which the wire is
untwisted.
241
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.4 The simple pendulum
to restore the wire to its untwisted state. For relatively small angles of twist, the
magnitude of this torque is directly proportional to the twist angle. Hence, we
can write
τ = −k θ, (11.16)
where k > 0 is the torque constant of the wire. The above equation is essentially
a torsional equivalent to Hooke’s law. The rotational equation of motion of the
system is written
I θ̈ = τ, (11.17)
where I is the moment of inertia of the disk (about a perpendicular axis through
its centre). The moment of inertia of the wire is assumed to be negligible. Com-
bining the previous two equations, we obtain
I θ̈ = −k θ. (11.18)
Equation (11.18) is clearly a simple harmonic equation [cf., Eq. (11.2)]. Hence,
we can immediately write the standard solution [cf., Eq. (11.3)]
θ = a cos(ω t − φ), (11.19)
where [cf., Eq. (11.5)]
k
ω= . (11.20)
I
We conclude that when a torsion pendulum is perturbed from its equilibrium state
(i.e., θ = 0), it executes torsional oscillations about this state at a fixed frequency,
ω, which depends only on the torque constant of the wire and the moment of
inertia of the disk. Note, in particular, that the frequency is independent of the
amplitude of the oscillation [provided θ remains small enough that Eq. (11.16)
still applies]. Torsion pendulums are often used for time-keeping purposes. For
instance, the balance wheel in a mechanical wristwatch is a torsion pendulum in
which the restoring torque is provided by a coiled spring.
242
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.4 The simple pendulum
fixed support
pivot point
l
θ
T
mg
Fig. 97. This setup is known as a simple pendulum. Let θ be the angle subtended
between the string and the downward vertical. Obviously, the equilibrium state of
the simple pendulum corresponds to the situation in which the mass is stationary
and hanging vertically down (i.e., θ = 0). The angular equation of motion of the
pendulum is simply
I θ̈ = τ, (11.21)
where I is the moment of inertia of the mass, and τ is the torque acting on the
system. For the case in hand, given that the mass is essentially a point particle,
and is situated a distance l from the axis of rotation (i.e., the pivot point), it is
easily seen that I = m l2 .
The two forces acting on the mass are the downward gravitational force, m g,
and the tension, T , in the string. Note, however, that the tension makes no con-
tribution to the torque, since its line of action clearly passes through the pivot
point. From simple trigonometry, the line of action of the gravitational force
passes a distance l sin θ from the pivot point. Hence, the magnitude of the grav-
itational torque is m g l sin θ. Moreover, the gravitational torque is a restoring
torque: i.e., if the mass is displaced slightly from its equilibrium state (i.e., θ = 0)
then the gravitational force clearly acts to push the mass back toward that state.
243
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.4 The simple pendulum
Suppose that we restrict our attention to relatively small deviations from the
equilibrium state. In other words, suppose that the angle θ is constrained to take
fairly small values. We know, from trigonometry, that for |θ| less than about 6 ◦ it
is a good approximation to write
sin θ θ. (11.24)
l θ̈ = −g θ, (11.25)
244
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.5 The compound pendulum
Pivot point P
d
θ
C Centre of mass
Mg
Consider an extended body of mass M with a hole drilled though it. Suppose that
the body is suspended from a fixed peg, which passes through the hole, such that
it is free to swing from side to side, as shown in Fig. 98. This setup is known as a
compound pendulum.
Let P be the pivot point, and let C be the body’s centre of mass, which is located
a distance d from the pivot. Let θ be the angle subtended between the downward
vertical (which passes through point P) and the line PC. The equilibrium state of
the compound pendulum corresponds to the case in which the centre of mass lies
vertically below the pivot point: i.e., θ = 0. See Sect. 10.3. The angular equation
of motion of the pendulum is simply
I θ̈ = τ, (11.27)
where I is the moment of inertia of the body about the pivot point, and τ is the
torque. Using similar arguments to those employed for the case of the simple
pendulum (recalling that all the weight of the pendulum acts at its centre of
mass), we can write
τ = −M g d sin θ. (11.28)
245
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
Note that the reaction, R, at the peg does not contribute to the torque, since
its line of action passes through the pivot point. Combining the previous two
equations, we obtain the following angular equation of motion of the pendulum:
I θ̈ = −M g d sin θ. (11.29)
Finally, adopting the small angle approximation, sin θ θ, we arrive at the simple
harmonic equation:
I θ̈ = −M g d θ. (11.30)
It is clear, by analogy with our previous solutions of such equations, that the
angular frequency of small amplitude oscillations of a compound pendulum is
given by
M g d
ω= . (11.31)
I
246
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
a a sinθ
θ
x
a cos θ
Since the object is executing uniform circular motion, we expect the angle θ to
increase linearly with time. In other words, we can write
θ = ω t, (11.34)
where ω is the angular rotation frequency (i.e., the number of radians through
which the object rotates per second). Here, it is assumed that θ = 0 at t = 0, for
the sake of convenience.
From simple trigonometry, the x- and y-coordinates of the object can be writ-
ten
x = a cos θ, (11.35)
y = a sin θ, (11.36)
respectively. Hence, combining the previous equations, we obtain
x = a cos(ω t), (11.37)
y = a cos(ω t − π/2). (11.38)
Here, use has been made of the trigonometric identity sin θ = cos(θ − π/2). A
comparison of the above two equations with the standard equation of simple har-
monic motion, Eq. (11.3), reveals that our object is executing simple harmonic
247
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
motion simultaneously along both the x- and the y -axes. Note, however, that
these two motions are 90◦ (i.e., π/2 radians) out of phase. Moreover, the am-
plitude of the motion equals the radius of the circle. Clearly, there is a close
relationship between simple harmonic motion and circular motion.
Answer: We are told that the amplitude of the oscillation is a = 0.07 m. Moreover,
when converted to cycles per second (i.e., hertz), the frequency of the oscillation
becomes
4000
f= = 66.6666 Hz.
60
Hence, the angular frequency is
ω = 2 π f = 418.88 rad./sec.
248
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
equilibrium position, the velocity of the block is 0.75 m/s. What is the period of
oscillation of the block?
Answer: Let x1 and x2 represent the extensions of the first and second springs,
respectively. The net displacement x of the mass from its equilibrium position is
then given by
x = x1 + x2 .
249
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
k1 k2
m
f = keff x = k1 x1 .
Here, keff is the effective force constant of the two springs. The above equations
can be combined to give
k1 x1 k1 k1 k2
keff = = = .
x1 + x 2 1 + k1 /k2 k1 + k2
Thus, the problem reduces to that of a block of mass m = 3 kg attached to a
spring of effective force constant
k1 k2 1200 × 400
keff = = = 300 N/m.
k1 + k2 1200 + 400
The angular frequency of oscillation is immediately given by the standard formula
keff 300
ω= = = 10 rad./s.
m 3
Hence, the period of oscillation is
2π
T= = 0.6283 s.
ω
250
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
251
11 OSCILLATORY MOTION 11.6 Uniform circular motion
Now, ω = g/l for small amplitude oscillations of a simple pendulum. Rear-
rangement off this formula gives
Answer: The moment of inertia of the disk about a perpendicular axis passing
through its centre is I = (1/2) M r2 . From the parallel axis theorem, the moment
of inertia of the disk about the pivot point is
3 × 0.8 × 0.8
I = I + M d2 = + 3 × 0.25 × 0.25 = 1.1475 kg m2 .
2
The angular frequency of small amplitude oscillations of a compound pendulum
is given by
M g d 3 × 9.81 × 0.25
ω=
= = 2.532 rad./s.
I 1.1475
Hence, the answer is 2.532 rad./s.
252
12 ORBITAL MOTION
12 Orbital motion
12.1 Introduction
We have spent this course exploring the theory of motion first outlined by Sir
Isaac Newton in his Principia (1687). It is, therefore, interesting to discuss
the particular application of this theory which made Newton an international
celebrity, and which profoundly and permanently changed humankind’s outlook
on the Universe. This application is, of course, the motion of the Solar System.
Humankind has always been fascinated by the night sky, and, in particular, by
the movements of the Sun, the Moon, and the objects which the ancient Greeks
called plantai (“wanderers”), and which we call planets. In ancient times, much
of this interest was of a practical nature. The Sun and the Moon were impor-
tant for determining the calendar, and also for navigation. Moreover, the planets
were vital to astrology: i.e., the belief—almost universally prevalent in the an-
cient world—that the positions of the planets in the sky could be used to foretell
important events.
Actually, there were only seven “wandering” heavenly bodies visible to ancient
peoples: the Sun, the Moon, and the five planets—Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
and Saturn. The ancients believed that the stars were fixed to a “celestial sphere”
which formed the outer boundary of the Universe. However, it was recognized
that the wandering bodies were located within this sphere: e.g., because the
Moon clearly passes in front of, and blocks the light from, stars in its path. It
was also recognized that some bodies were closer to the Earth than others. For
instance, ancient astronomers noted that the Moon occasionally passes in front
of the Sun and each of the planets. Moreover, Mercury and Venus can sometimes
be seen to transit in front of the Sun.
The first scientific model of the Solar System was outlined by the Greek philoso-
253
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
pher Eudoxas of Cnidus (409–356 BC). According to this model, the Sun, the
Moon, and the planets all execute uniform circular orbits around the Earth—
which is fixed, and non-rotating. The order of the orbits is as follows: Moon,
Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn—with the Moon closest to the Earth.
For obvious reasons, Eudoxas’ model became known as the geocentric model of
the Solar System. Note that orbits are circular in this model for philosophical
reasons. The ancients believed the heavens to be the realm of perfection. Since
a circle is the most “perfect” imaginable shape, it follows that heavenly objects
must execute circular orbits.
The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for
three main reasons:
1. If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the
Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot “feel” this motion. Nor does
this motion give rise to any obvious observational consequences. Hence, the
Earth must be stationary.
2. If the Earth is executing a circular orbit around the Sun then the positions of
the stars should be slightly different when the Earth is on opposite sides of
the Sun. This effect is known as parallax. Since no stellar parallax is observ-
able (at least, with the naked eye), the Earth must be stationary. In order
to appreciate the force of this argument, it is important to realize that an-
cient astronomers did not suppose the stars to be significantly further away
from the Earth than the planets. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just
beyond the orbit of Saturn.
3. The geocentric model is far more philosophically attractive than the helio-
254
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
epicycle
deferant
planet
P
centre of deferant
Earth
+
C E
equant
centric model, since in the former model the Earth occupies a privileged
position in the Universe.
The geocentric model was first converted into a proper scientific theory, ca-
pable of accurate predictions, by the Alexandrian philosopher Claudius Ptolemy
(85–165 AD). The theory that Ptolemy proposed in his famous book, now known
as the Almagest, remained the dominant scientific picture of the Solar System for
over a millennium. Basically, Ptolemy acquired and extended the extensive set
of planetary observations of his predecessor Hipparchus, and then constructed a
geocentric model capable of accounting for them. However, in order to fit the
observations, Ptolemy was forced to make some significant modifications to the
original model of Eudoxas. Let us discuss these modifications.
255
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
to displace the Earth slightly from the common centre of the deferants. More-
over, Ptolemy assumed that the Sun, Moon, and planets rotate uniformly about
an imaginary point, called the equant, which is displaced an equal distance in the
opposite direction to the Earth from the centre of the deferants. In other words,
Ptolemy assumed that the line EP, in Fig. 100, rotates uniformly, rather than the
line CP.
Figure 101 shows more details of the Ptolemaic model.2 Note that this dia-
gram is not drawn to scale, and the displacement of the Earth from the centre
of the deferants has been omitted for the sake of clarity. It can be seen that the
Moon and the Sun do not possess epicyles. Moreover, the motions of the inferior
planets (i.e., Mercury and Venus) are closely linked to the motion of the Sun. In
fact, the centres of the inferior planet epicycles move on an imaginary line con-
necting the Earth and the Sun. Furthermore, the radius vectors connecting the
superior planets (i.e., Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) to the centres of their epicycles
are always parallel to the geometric line connecting the Earth and the Sun. Note
that, in addition to the motion indicated in the diagram, all of the heavenly bodies
(including the stars) rotate clockwise (assuming that we are looking down on the
Earth’s North pole in Fig. 101) with a period of 1 day. Finally, there are epicycles
within the epicycles shown in the diagram. In fact, some planets need as many
as 28 epicycles to account for all the details of their motion. These subsidiary
epicycles are not shown in the diagram, for the sake of clarity.
256
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
Stars
29.46 y
11.86 y
1.88 y
Mars
1y
1y
1y
1y
27 1/3 d
Venus
Earth Mercury Sun
88 d
225 d
Moon
Jupiter
1y
Saturn
1y
257
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
Ptolemy’s model of the Solar System was rescued from the wreck of ancient
European civilization by the Roman Catholic Church, which, unfortunately, con-
verted it into a minor article of faith, on the basis of a few references in the Bible
which seemed to imply that the Earth is stationary and the Sun is moving (e.g.,
Joshua 10:12-13, Habakkuk 3:11). Consequently, this model was not subject to
proper scientific criticism for over a millennium. Having said this, few medieval
or renaissance philosophers were entirely satisfied with Ptolemy’s model. Their
dissatisfaction focused, not on the many epicycles (which to the modern eye seem
rather absurd), but on the displacement of the Earth from the centre of the defer-
ants, and the introduction of the equant as the centre of uniform rotation. Recall,
that the only reason planetary orbits are constructed from circles in Ptolemy’s
model is to preserve the assumed ideal symmetry of the heavens. Unfortunately,
this symmetry is severely compromised when the Earth is displaced from the
apparent centre of the Universe. This problem so perplexed the Polish priest-
astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473–1543) that he eventually decided to re-
ject the geocentric model, and revive the heliocentric model of Aristarchus. After
many years of mathematical calculations, Copernicus published a book entitled
De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the revolutions of the celestial spheres)
in 1543 which outlined his new heliocentric theory.
Copernicus’ model is illustrated in Fig. 102. Again, this diagram is not to scale.
The planets execute uniform circular orbits about the Sun, and the Moon orbits
about the Earth. Finally, the Earth revolves about its axis daily. Note that there is
no displacement of the Sun from the centres of the planetary orbits, and there is
no equant. Moreover, in this model, the inferior planets remain close to the Sun
in the sky without any special synchronization of their orbits. Furthermore, the
occasional retrograde motion of the superior planets has a more natural explana-
tion than in Ptolemy’s model. Since the Earth orbits more rapidly than the supe-
rior planets, it occasionally “overtakes” them, and they appear to move backward
in the night sky, in much the same manner that slow moving cars on a freeway
appears to move backward to a driver overtaking them. Copernicus accounted
for the lack of stellar parallax, due to the Earth’s motion, by postulating that the
stars were a lot further away than had previously been supposed, rendering any
parallax undetectably small. Unfortunately, Copernicus insisted on retaining uni-
258
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
29.46 y
11.86 y
Stars
1.88 y
1y
Mars
225 d
Venus
88 d
Mercury Moon
Sun
Earth
27 1/3 d
Jupiter
Saturn
259
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
form circular motion in his model (after all, he was trying to construct a more
symmetric model than that of Ptolemy). Consequently, Copernicus also had to
resort to epicycles to fit the data. In fact, Copernicus’ model ended up with more
epicycles than Ptolemy’s!
1. The planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun at one focus.
2. A line from the Sun to any given planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time
intervals.
3. The square of a planet’s period is proportional to the cube of the planet’s
mean distance from the Sun.
Note that there are no epicyles or equants in Kepler’s model of the Solar System.
Figure 103 illustrates Kepler’s second law. Here, the ellipse represents a plan-
etary orbit, and S represents the Sun, which is located at one of the focii of the
ellipse. Suppose that the planet moves from point A to point B in the same time
it takes to move from point C to point D. According the Kepler’s second law,
260
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.2 Historical background
C
B
S
A
D
Table 5: Kepler’s third law. Here, a is the mean distance from the Sun, measured in Astronomical
Units (1 AU is the mean Earth-Sun distance), and T is the orbital period, measured in years.
the areas of the elliptic segments ASB and CSD are equal. Note that this law
basically mandates that planets speed up when they move closer to the Sun.
Table 5 illustrates Kepler’s third law. The mean distance, a, and orbital period,
T , as well as the ratio a3 /T 2 , are listed for each of the first six planets in the Solar
System. It can be seen that the ratio a3 /T 2 is indeed constant from planet to
planet.
Since we have now definitely adopted a heliocentric model of the Solar Sys-
tem, let us discuss the ancient Greek objections to such a model, listed earlier.
We have already dealt with the second objection (the absence of stellar parallax)
by stating that the stars are a lot further away from the Earth than the ancient
Greeks supposed. The third objection (that it is philosophically more attractive
to have the Earth at the centre of the Universe) is not a valid scientific criticism.
What about the first objection? If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and also
261
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.3 Gravity
orbiting the Sun, why do we not “feel” this motion? At first sight, this objec-
tion appears to have some force. After all, the rotation velocity of the Earth’s
surface is about 460 m/s. Moreover, the Earth’s orbital velocity is approximately
30 km/s. Surely, we would notice if we were moving this rapidly? Of course, this
reasoning is faulty because we know, from Newton’s laws of motion, that we only
“feel” the acceleration associated with motion, not the motion itself. It turns out
that the acceleration at the Earth’s surface due to its axial rotation is only about
0.034 m/s2 . Moreover, the Earth’s acceleration due to its orbital motion is only
0.0059 m/s2 . Nowadays, we can detect such small accelerations, but the ancient
Greeks certainly could not.
Kepler correctly formulated the three laws of planetary motion in 1619. Al-
most seventy years later, in 1687, Isaac Newton published his Principia, in which
he presented, for the first time, a universal theory of motion. Newton then went
on to illustrate his theory by using it to deriving Kepler’s laws from first principles.
Let us now discuss Newton’s monumental achievement in more detail.
12.3 Gravity
There is one important question which we have avoided discussing until now.
Why do objects fall towards the surface of the Earth? The ancient Greeks had
a very simple answer to this question. According to Aristotle, all objects have
a natural tendency to fall towards the centre of the Universe. Since the centre
of the Earth coincides with the centre of the Universe, all objects also tend to
fall towards the Earth’s surface. So, an ancient Greek might ask, why do the
planets not fall towards the Earth? Well, according to Aristotle, the planets are
embedded in crystal spheres which rotate with them whilst holding them in place
in the firmament. Unfortunately, Ptolemy seriously undermined this explanation
by shifting the Earth slightly from the centre of the Universe. However, the coup
de grace was delivered by Copernicus, who converted the Earth into just another
planet orbiting the Sun.
So, why do objects fall towards the surface of the Earth? The first person,
after Aristotle, to seriously consider this question was Sir Isaac Newton. Since
262
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.3 Gravity
2
f = G m 1 m2 / r
m2
−f
r
f
m1
the Earth is not located in a special place in the Universe, Newton reasoned,
objects must be attracted toward the Earth itself. Moreover, since the Earth is just
another planet, objects must be attracted towards other planets as well. In fact,
all objects must exert a force of attraction on all other objects in the Universe.
What intrinsic property of objects causes them to exert this attractive force—
which Newton termed gravity—on other objects? Newton decided that the crucial
property was mass. After much thought, he was eventually able to formulate his
famous law of universal gravitation:
Every particle in the Universe attracts every other particle with a force directly
proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the
square of the distance between them. The direction of the force is along the
line joining the particles.
Incidentally, Newton adopted an inverse square law because he knew that this
was the only type of force law which was consistent with Kepler’s third law of
planetary motion.
263
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.3 Gravity
Let r1 and r2 be the vector positions of the two objects, respectively. The vector
gravitational force exerted by object 2 on object 1 can be written
r2 − r1
f12 = G . (12.2)
|r2 − r1 |3
Likewise, the vector gravitational force exerted by object 1 on object 2 takes the
form
r1 − r2
f21 = G = −f21 . (12.3)
|r1 − r2 |3
Let us use Newton’s law of gravity to account for the Earth’s surface gravity.
Consider an object of mass m close to the surface of the Earth, whose mass and
radius are M⊕ = 5.97 × 1024 kg and R⊕ = 6.378 × 106 m, respectively. Newton
proved, after considerable effort, that the gravitational force exerted by a spher-
ical body (outside that body) is the same as that exerted by an equivalent point
mass located at the body’s centre. Hence, the gravitational force exerted by the
Earth on the object in question is of magnitude
m M⊕
f=G , (12.5)
R⊕2
and is directed towards the centre of the Earth. It follows that the equation of
motion of the object can be written
m M⊕
m r̈ = −G ^z, (12.6)
R⊕2
264
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.4 Gravitational potential energy
where ^z is a unit vector pointing straight upwards (i.e., away from the Earth’s
centre). Canceling the factor m on either side of the above equation, we obtain
where
G M⊕ (6.673 × 10−11 ) × (5.97 × 1024 )
g⊕ = = = 9.79 m/s2 . (12.8)
2
R⊕ (6.378 × 10 )6 2
Thus, we conclude that all objects on the Earth’s surface, irrespective of their
mass, accelerate straight down (i.e., towards the Earth’s centre) with a constant
acceleration of 9.79 m/s2 . This estimate for the acceleration due to gravity is
slightly off the conventional value of 9.81 m/s2 because the Earth is actually not
quite spherical.
We saw earlier, in Sect. 5.5, that gravity is a conservative force, and, therefore,
has an associated potential energy. Let us obtain a general formula for this energy.
Consider a point object of mass m, which is a radial distance r from another point
object of mass M. The gravitational force acting on the first mass is of magnitude
f = G M/r2 , and is directed towards the second mass. Imagine that the first
mass moves radially away from the second mass, until it reaches infinity. What
265
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.4 Gravitational potential energy
Table 6: The mass, M, radius, R, and surface gravity, g, of various bodies in the Solar System. All
quantities are expressed as fractions of the corresponding terrestrial quantity.
is the change in the potential energy of the first mass associated with this shift?
According to Eq. (5.33),
∞
U(∞) − U(r) = − [−f(r)] dr. (12.10)
r
There is a minus sign in front of f because this force is oppositely directed to the
motion. The above expression can be integrated to give
GMm
U(r) = − . (12.11)
r
Here, we have adopted the convenient normalization that the potential energy
at infinity is zero. According to the above formula, the gravitational potential
energy of a mass m located a distance r from a mass M is simply −G M m/r.
Consider an object of mass m moving close to the Earth’s surface. The potential
energy of such an object can be written
G M⊕ m
U=− , (12.12)
R⊕ + z
where M⊕ and R⊕ are the mass and radius of the Earth, respectively, and z is the
vertical height of the object above the Earth’s surface. In the limit that z R ⊕ ,
the above expression can be expanded using the binomial theorem to give
G M⊕ m G M⊕ m
U− + z, (12.13)
R⊕ R⊕2
266
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.4 Gravitational potential energy
267
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.5 Satellite orbits
Suppose that the satellite’s orbit lies in the Earth’s equatorial plane. Moreover,
suppose that the satellite’s orbital angular velocity just matches the Earth’s angu-
lar velocity of rotation. In this case, the satellite will appear to hover in the same
place in the sky to a stationary observer on the Earth’s surface. A satellite with
this singular property is known as a geostationary satellite.
Virtually all of the satellites used to monitor the Earth’s weather patterns are
geostationary in nature. Communications satellites also tend to be geostationary.
Of course, the satellites which beam satellite-TV to homes across the world must
be geostationary—otherwise, you would need to install an expensive tracking
antenna on top of your house in order to pick up the transmissions. Incidentally,
the person who first envisaged rapid global telecommunication via a network of
geostationary satellites was the science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke in 1945.
268
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
Let us now see whether we can use Newton’s universal laws of motion to derive
Kepler’s laws of planetary motion. Consider a planet orbiting around the Sun. It
is convenient to specify the planet’s instantaneous position, with respect to the
Sun, in terms of the polar coordinates r and θ. As illustrated in Fig. 105, r is the
radial distance between the planet and the Sun, whereas θ is the angular bearing
of the planet, from the Sun, measured with respect to some arbitrarily chosen
direction.
Let us define two unit vectors, er and eθ . (A unit vector is simply a vector
whose length is unity.) As shown in Fig. 105, the radial unit vector er always
points from the Sun towards the instantaneous position of the planet. Moreover,
the tangential unit vector eθ is always normal to er , in the direction of increasing
θ. In Sect. 7.5, we demonstrated that when acceleration is written in terms of
polar coordinates, it takes the form
a = ar er + aθ eθ , (12.22)
where
ar = r̈ − r θ̇2 , (12.23)
aθ = r θ̈ + 2 ṙ θ̇. (12.24)
269
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
eθ
er
Planet
θ
Sun
These expressions are more complicated that the corresponding cartesian expres-
sions because the unit vectors er and eθ change direction as the planet changes
position.
Now, the planet is subject to a single force: i.e., the force of gravitational
attraction exerted by the Sun. In polar coordinates, this force takes a particularly
simple form (which is why we are using polar coordinates):
G M m
f=− er . (12.25)
r2
The minus sign indicates that the force is directed towards, rather than away
from, the Sun.
m a = f. (12.26)
270
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
δθ
P’
P
S
r
l = m r vθ = m r2 θ̇, (12.32)
yielding
l
h= . (12.33)
m
Clearly, h represents the angular momentum (per unit mass) of our planet around
the Sun. Angular momentum is conserved (i.e., h is constant) because the force
of gravitational attraction between the planet and the Sun exerts zero torque on
the planet. (Recall, from Sect. 9, that torque is the rate of change of angular mo-
mentum.) The torque is zero because the gravitational force is radial in nature:
i.e., its line of action passes through the Sun, and so its associated lever arm is of
length zero.
The quantity h has another physical interpretation. Consider Fig. 106. Sup-
pose that our planet moves from P to P in the short time interval δt. Here, S
271
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
represents the position of the Sun. The lines SP and SP are both approximately
of length r. Moreover, using simple trigonometry, the line PP is of length r δθ,
where δθ is the small angle through which the line joining the Sun and the planet
rotates in the time interval δt. The area of the triangle PSP is approximately
1
δA = × r δθ × r : (12.34)
2
i.e., half its base times its height. Of course, this area represents the area swept
out by the line joining the Sun and the planet in the time interval δt. Hence, the
rate at which this area is swept is given by
δA 1 2 δθ r2 θ̇ h
lim = r lim = = . (12.35)
δt→0 δt 2 δt→0 δt 2 2
Clearly, the fact that h is a constant of the motion implies that the line joining the
planet and the Sun sweeps out area at a constant rate: i.e., the line sweeps equal
areas in equal time intervals. But, this is just Kepler’s second law. We conclude
that Kepler’s second law of planetary motion is a direct manifestation of angular
momentum conservation.
Let
1
r= , (12.36)
u
where u(t) ≡ u(θ) is a new radial variable. Differentiating with respect to t, we
obtain
u̇ θ̇ du du
ṙ = − 2 = − 2 = −h . (12.37)
u u dθ dθ
The last step follows from the fact that θ̇ = h u2 . Differentiating a second time
with respect to t, we obtain
d du d2 u d2 u
r̈ = −h = −h θ̇ 2 = −h2 u2 2 . (12.38)
dt dθ dθ dθ
Equations (12.27) and (12.38) can be combined to give
d2 u G M
+ u = . (12.39)
dθ2 h2
272
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
The above formula can be inverted to give the following simple orbit equation
for our planet:
1
r= . (12.41)
A cos(θ − θ0 ) + G M /h2
The constant θ0 merely determines the orientation of the orbit. Since we are only
interested in the orbit’s shape, we can set this quantity to zero without loss of
generality. Hence, our orbit equation reduces to
1+e
r = r0 , (12.42)
1 + e cos θ
where
A h2
e= , (12.43)
G M
and
h2
r0 = . (12.44)
G M (1 + e)
Formula (12.42) is the standard equation of an ellipse (assuming e < 1), with
the origin at a focus. Hence, we have now proved Kepler’s first law of planetary
motion. It is clear that r0 is the radial distance at θ = 0. The radial distance at
θ = π is written
1+e
r1 = r 0 . (12.45)
1−e
Here, r0 is termed the perihelion distance (i.e., the closest distance to the Sun)
and r1 is termed the aphelion distance (i.e., the furthest distance from the Sun).
The quantity
r1 − r 0
e= (12.46)
r1 + r 0
is termed the eccentricity of the orbit, and is a measure of its departure from
circularity. Thus, e = 0 corresponds to a purely circular orbit, whereas e →
273
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
Planet e
Mercury 0.206
Venus 0.007
Earth 0.017
Mars 0.093
Jupiter 0.048
Saturn 0.056
According to Eq. (12.35), a line joining the Sun and an orbiting planet sweeps
area at the constant rate h/2. Let T be the planet’s orbital period. We expect the
line to sweep out the whole area of the ellipse enclosed by the planet’s orbit in
the time interval T . Since the area of an ellipse is π a b, where a and b are the
semi-major and semi-minor axes, we can write
πab
T= . (12.47)
h/2
Incidentally, Fig. 107 illustrates the relationship between the aphelion distance,
the perihelion distance, and the semi-major and semi-minor axes of a planetary
orbit. It is clear, from the figure, that the semi-major axis is just the mean of the
aphelion and perihelion distances: i.e.,
r0 + r 1
a= . (12.48)
2
Thus, a is essentially the planet’s mean distance from the Sun. Finally, the rela-
tionship between a, b, and the eccentricity, e, is given by the well-known formula
b
= 1 − e2 . (12.49)
a
This formula can easily be obtained from Eq. (12.42).
focus
b
r a
0
r1
It follows, from Eqs. (12.47), (12.49), and (12.50), that the orbital period can be
written
2π
T=√ a3/2 . (12.51)
G M
Thus, the orbital period of a planet is proportional to its mean distance from
the Sun to the power 3/2—the constant of proportionality being the same for all
planets. Of course, this is just Kepler’s third law of planetary motion.
Question: Callisto is the eighth of Jupiter’s moons: its mass and radius are
M = 1.08 × 1023 kg and R = 2403 km, respectively. What is the gravitational
acceleration on the surface of this moon?
275
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
Question: A rocket is located a distance 3.5 times the radius of the Earth above
the Earth’s surface. What is the rocket’s free-fall acceleration?
Answer: Let R⊕ be the Earth’s radius. The distance of the rocket from the centre
of the Earth is r1 = (3.5 + 1) R⊕ = 4.5 R⊕ . We know that the free-fall acceleration
of the rocket when its distance from the Earth’s centre is r0 = R⊕ (i.e., when it is
at the Earth’s surface) is g0 = 9.81 m/s2 . Moreover, we know that gravity is an
inverse-square law (i.e., g ∝ 1/r2 ). Hence, the rocket’s acceleration is
2
r0 9.81 × 1
g1 = g0 = = 0.484 m/s2 .
r1 (4.5) 2
Question: A satellite moves in a circular orbit around the Earth with speed v =
6000 m/s. Determine the satellite’s altitude above the Earth’s surface. Determine
the period of the satellite’s orbit. The Earth’s mass and radius are M ⊕ = 5.97 ×
1024 kg and R⊕ = 6.378 × 106 m, respectively.
Answer: The acceleration of the satellite towards the centre of the Earth is v 2 /r,
where r is its orbital radius. This acceleration must be provided by the accelera-
tion G M⊕ /r2 due to the Earth’s gravitational attraction. Hence,
v2 G M⊕
= .
r r2
The above expression can be rearranged to give
G M⊕ (6.673 × 10−11 ) × (5.97 × 1024 )
r= = = 1.107 × 107 m.
v2 (6000) 2
276
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
Question: The distance of closest approach of Halley’s comet to the Sun is 0.57 AU.
(1 AU is the mean Earth-Sun distance.) The greatest distance of the comet from
the Sun is 35 AU. The comet’s speed at closest approach is 54 km/s. What is its
speed when it is furthest from the Sun?
Question: A planet is in circular orbit around a star. The period and radius of the
orbit are T = 4.3 × 107 s and r = 2.34 × 1011 m, respectively. Calculate the mass
of the star.
277
12 ORBITAL MOTION 12.6 Planetary orbits
Answer: Let ω be the planet’s orbital angular velocity. The planet accelerates
towards the star with acceleration ω2 r. The acceleration due to the star’s gravi-
tational attraction is G M∗ /r2 , where M∗ is the mass of the star. Equating these
accelerations, we obtain
G M∗
ω2 r = .
r2
Now,
2π
T= .
ω
Hence, combining the previous two expressions, we get
4 π2 r3
M∗ = .
G T2
Thus, the mass of the star is
4 × π2 × (2.34 × 1011 )3
M∗ = = 4.01 × 1030 kg.
(6.673 × 10 ) × (4.3 × 10 )
−11 7 2
Answer: The energy which must be given to the probe should just match the
probe’s gain in potential energy as it travels from the Earth’s surface to outer
space. By definition, the probe’s potential energy in outer space is zero. The
potential energy of the probe at the Earth’s surface is
G M⊕ m (6.673 × 10−11 ) × (5.97 × 1024 ) × 120
U=− = = −7.495 × 109 J.
R⊕ (6.378 × 10 )6
Thus, the gain in potential energy, which is the same as the minimum launch
energy, is 7.495 × 109 J.
278
13 WAVE MOTION
13 Wave motion
13.1 Introduction
Probably the simplest type of wave is that which propagates down a stretched
string. Consider a straight string which is stretched such that it is under uniform
tension T . Let the string run along the x-axis. Suppose that the string is subject
to a small amplitude displacement, in the y-direction, which can vary along its
length. Let y(x, t) be the string’s displacement at position x and time t. What is
the equation of motion for y(x, t)?
279
13 WAVE MOTION 13.2 Waves on a stretched string
y −>
T
δθ 2
δθ1
Consider the y-component of the string segment’s equation of motion. The net
force acting on the segment in the y-direction takes the form
280
13 WAVE MOTION 13.2 Waves on a stretched string
Here, ∂2 y(x, t)/∂x2 is the second derivative of y(x, t) with respect to x, keeping t
constant.
Suppose that the string has a mass per unit length μ. It follows that the y
equation of motion of our string segment takes the form
∂2 y(x, t)
μ δx = fy (x, t), (13.5)
∂t2
Here, ∂2 y(x, t)/∂t2 —the second derivative of y(x, t) with respect to t, keeping
x constant—is the y-acceleration of the string segment at position x and time t.
Equations (13.4) and (13.5) yield the final expression for the string’s equation of
motion:
∂2 y T ∂2 y
= . (13.6)
∂t2 μ ∂x2
Equation (13.7) also describes a sinusoidal pattern which propagates along the
x-axis without changing shape. We can see this by examining the motion of the
wave peaks, y = +y0 , which correspond to
k x − ω t = n 2 π, (13.18)
282
13 WAVE MOTION 13.2 Waves on a stretched string
Figure 109: A sinusoidal wave propagating down the x-axis. The solid, dotted, dashed, and dot-
dashed curves show the wave displacement at four successive and equally spaced times.
In other words, the wave peaks all propagate along the x-axis with uniform speed
ω
v= . (13.20)
k
It is easily demonstrated that the wave troughs, y = −y0 , propagate with the
same speed. Thus, it is fairly clear that the whole wave pattern moves with speed
v—see Fig. 109. Equations (13.14), (13.17), and (13.20) yield
v = fλ : (13.21)
i.e., a wave’s speed is the product of its frequency and its wavelength. This is true
for all types of (sinusoidal) wave.
283
13 WAVE MOTION 13.3 General waves
284
13 WAVE MOTION 13.4 Wave-pulses
x −>
Figure 110: A wave-pulse propagating down the x-axis. The solid, dotted, and dashed curves show
the wave displacement at three successive and equally spaced times.
13.4 Wave-pulses
As is easily demonstrated, the most general solution of the wave equation (13.23)
is written
F(x − v t), (13.29)
285
13 WAVE MOTION 13.4 Wave-pulses
G(x + v t) (13.30)
What is the relationship between these new wave-pulse solutions and our pre-
vious sinusoidal wave solutions? It turns out that any wave-pulse can be built up
from a suitable linear superposition of sinusoidal waves. For instance, if F(x − v t)
represents a wave-pulse propagating down the x-axis, then we can write
∞
F(x − v t) = F̄(k) cos [k (x − v t)] dk, (13.31)
0
where we have assumed that F(−p) = F(p), for the sake of simplicity. The above
formula is basically a recipe for generating the propagating wave-pulse F(x − v t)
from a suitable admixture of sinusoidal waves of definite wavelength and fre-
quency: F̄(k) specifies the required amplitude of the wavelength λ = 2 π/k com-
ponent. How do we determine F̄(k) for a given wave-pulse? Well, a mathematical
result known as Fourier’s theorem yields
2 ∞
F̄(k) = F(p) cos (k p) dp, (13.32)
π 0
The above expression essentially tells us the strength of the wavenumber k com-
ponent of the wave-pulse F(x − v t). Note that the function F̄(k) is known as the
Fourier spectrum of the wave-pulse F(x − v t).
Figures 111 and 112 show two different wave-pulses and their associated
Fourier spectra. Note how, by combining sinusoidal waves of varying wavenum-
ber in different proportions, it is possible to build up wave-pulses of completely
different shape.
286
13 WAVE MOTION 13.4 Wave-pulses
Figure 111: A propagating wave-pulse, F(x − v t), and its associated Fourier spectrum, F̄(k).
287
13 WAVE MOTION 13.4 Wave-pulses
Figure 112: A propagating wave-pulse, F(x − v t), and its associated Fourier spectrum, F̄(k).
288
13 WAVE MOTION 13.5 Standing waves
Up to now, all of the wave solutions that we have investigated have been propa-
gating solutions. Is it possible to construct a wave solution which does not prop-
agate? Suppose we combine a sinusoidal wave of amplitude y0 and wavenumber
k which propagates in the +x direction,
The standing wave shown in Fig. 113 can be thought of as the interference
pattern generated by combining the two traveling wave solutions y1 (x, t) and
y2 (x, t). At the anti-nodes, the waves reinforce one another, so that the oscillation
amplitude becomes double that associated with each wave individually—this is
termed constructive interference. At the nodes, the waves completely cancel one
another out—this is termed destructive interference.
289
13 WAVE MOTION 13.5 Standing waves
node
anti−node
Figure 113: A standing wave. The various curves show the wave displacement at different times.
where T and μ are the tension and mass per unit length of the string, respectively.
The above two equations can be combined to give
n
T
.
f= (13.41)
2L μ
Thus, the standing waves that can be excited on a guitar string have frequencies
f0 , 2 f0 , 3 f0 , etc., which are integer multiples of
1
T
.
f0 = (13.42)
2L μ
These frequencies are transmitted to our ear, via sound waves which oscillate in
sympathy with the guitar string, and are interpreted as musical notes. To be more
exact, the frequencies correspond to notes spaced an octave apart. The frequency
f0 is termed the fundamental frequency, whereas the frequencies 2 f0 , 3 f0 , etc. are
termed the overtone harmonic frequencies. When a guitar string is plucked an
admixture of standing waves, consisting predominantly of the fundamental har-
monic wave, is excited on the string. The fundamental harmonic determines the
musical note which the guitar string plays. However, it is the overtone harmonics
which give the note its peculiar timbre. Thus, a trumpet sounds different to a
guitar, even when they are both playing the same note, because a trumpet excites
a different mix of overtone harmonics than a guitar.
The wavelength and frequency of the wave, as seen by a stationary observer, are
λ = 2 π/k and f = ω/2 π, respectively. Consider a second observer moving with
uniform speed vo in the +x direction. What are the wavelength and frequency of
the wave, as seen by the second observer? Well, the x-coordinate in the moving
observer’s frame of reference is x = x − v0 t (see Sect. 4.9). Of course, both
291
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
observers measure the same time. Hence, in the second observer’s frame of ref-
erence the wave takes the form
where
ω = ω − k vo . (13.45)
Here, we have simply replaced x by x + vo t in Eq. (13.43). Clearly, the moving
observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength (i.e., the same k) but a
different frequency (i.e., a different ω) to that seen by the stationary observer.
This phenomenon is called the Doppler effect. Since v = ω/k, it follows that the
wave speed is also shifted in the moving observer’s frame of reference. In fact,
v = v − vo , (13.46)
where v is the wave speed seen by the moving observer. Finally, since v = f λ,
and the wavelength is the same in both the moving and stationary observers’
frames of reference, the wave frequency experienced by the moving observer is
vo
f = 1− f. (13.47)
v
Thus, the moving observer sees a lower frequency wave than the stationary ob-
server. This occurs because the moving observer is traveling in the same direction
as the wave, and is therefore effectively trying to catch it up. It is easily demon-
strated that an observer moving in the opposite direction to a wave sees a higher
frequency than a stationary observer. Hence, the general Doppler shift formula
(for a moving observer and a stationary wave source) is
vo
f = 1∓ f, (13.48)
v
where the upper/lower signs correspond to the observer moving in the same/opposite
direction to the wave.
292
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
that the first is emitted at time t = 0, and the second at time t = T , where
T = 1/f is the wave period in the frame of reference of the source. At time t, the
first wave crest has traveled a distance d1 = v t towards the observer, whereas
the second wave crest has traveled a distance d2 = v (t − T ) + vs T (measured
from the position of the source at t = 0). Here, we have taken into account the
fact that the source is a distance vs T closer to the observer when the second wave
crest is emitted. The effective wavelength, λ , seen by the observer is the distance
between neighbouring wave crests. Hence,
λ = d1 − d2 = (v − vs ) T. (13.49)
Since v = f λ , the effective frequency f seen by the observer is
f
f = , (13.50)
1 − vs /v
where f is the wave frequency in the frame of reference of the source. We con-
clude that if the source is moving towards the observer then the wave frequency
is shifted upwards. Likewise, if the source is moving away from the observer
then the frequency is shifted downwards. This manifestation of the Doppler effect
should be familiar to everyone. When an ambulance passes us on the street, its
siren has a higher pitch (i.e., a high frequency) when it is coming towards us than
when it is moving away from us. Of course, the oscillation frequency of the siren
never changes. It is the Doppler shift induced by the motion of the siren with
respect to a stationary listener which causes the frequency change.
The general formula for the shift in a wave’s frequency induced by relative
motion of the observer and the source is
⎛ ⎞
1 ∓ v o /v
f = ⎝ ⎠ f, (13.51)
1 ± vs /v
where vo is the speed of the observer, and vs is the speed of the source. The
upper/lower signs correspond to relative motion by which the observer and the
source move apart/together.
Probably the most notorious use of the Doppler effect in everyday life is in
police speed traps. In a speed trap, a policeman fires radar waves (i.e., electro-
magnetic waves of centimeter wavelength) of fixed frequency at an oncoming
293
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
car. These waves reflect off the car, which effectively becomes a moving source.
Hence, by measuring the frequency increase of the reflected waves, the policeman
can determine the car’s speed.
Answer: The fundamental standing wave on a stretched wire is such that the
length L of the wire corresponds to half the wavelength λ of the wave. Hence,
λ = 2 L = 1.80 m.
294
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
295
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
296
13 WAVE MOTION 13.6 The Doppler effect
in the frame of reference of the source. We have chosen a minus sign in the
numerator of the above formula because the observer is moving away from the
source, leading to a downward Doppler shift. We have chosen a minus sign in
the denominator of the above formula because the source is moving towards the
observer, leading to a upward Doppler shift. Hence,
⎛ ⎞
1 − 33/343 ⎠
f =⎝ × 500 = 514.95 Hz.
1 − 42/343
297