TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

CLIENT DETAILS
Company / Organisation: Ventia
Client contact: James Cracknell Mobile #: Email Address: [email protected]
Job / Purchase Order #: 59582
Risk Assessment Location: Desktop On Site Date of Assessment: 15/09/2022
Person Conducting Signature: Assessors Qualification:
Assessment: TMD Open# 468
Benjamin Luxford

PROJECT DETAILS / SCOPE OF WORKS

Location: Hope Island Rd, Hope Island
Site Extent #1: Gracemere Dr & The Lakes Dr Site Extent #2: Santa Barbara Rd
Project Commencement: September 2022
Project Conclusion: October 2022
Quantity of Shifts: 30 Shift Duration:
Time of Shift: Dayshift Nightshift Both (Long-term Project Work)
Project Staging: works to be conducted at roundabout of Gracemere Dr & The Lakes Dr
Staging Elements: Slow lane both NB/SB will be closed
Plant & Equipment Required: Truck, UTE
Method for Delivery of Materials & Equipment to Site: Driven to site as required
Required Access & Egress for Plant & Equipment: Entry via safety buffer / Exit via termination using gaps in traffic

SITE CONDITIONS & CHARACTERISTICS

Road #1: Hope Island Rd
Road Configuration: Multilane Posted Speed:70kph Traffic Volume: Unknown
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Near roundabout of Details: Near roundabout of Details:
Gracemere Dr & The Lakes Dr Gracemere Dr & The Lakes Dr
Road #2:
Road Configuration: Posted Speed: Traffic Volume:
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Details: Details:
Road #3:
Road Configuration: Posted Speed: Traffic Volume:
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Details: Details:
Road #4:
Road Configuration: Posted Speed: Traffic Volume:
Formed Footways: Yes No Pedestrian Crossings: Yes No Traffic Signals: Yes No Other:
Details: Details: Details:
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

Site Risk Rating & Risk Assessment Matrix

 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party

Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 Environmental features (weather/smoke)
 Retro-reflective devices to be used
obscuring positioning of signs and devices –  PCBU
 Revise positioning within allowed limits.
traffic unable to react appropriately to changed MEDIUM LOW  TMD
 Where limits are outside tolerances,
conditions.  TMI
TMI shall contact TMD for guidance.

 Shadow, fog, or glare impacting on visibility of  Retro-reflective devices to be used

 PCBU
traffic control devices – traffic unable to react  Revise positioning within allowed limits.
MEDIUM LOW  TMD
appropriately to changed conditions.  Where limits are outside tolerances,
 TMI
TMI shall contact TMD for guidance.
Existing road surface unsafe for worksite –
Workers and traffic exposed to additional
N/A  Road surface in good trafficable condition
geographical risks.

Changes in condition of road surface due to road

work – additional hazards created N/A  Road surface in good trafficable condition
for traffic.

 Trafficable lane to be clearly identified & delineated

  PCBU
 Site access/egress conflicting with traffic flow –  Access/egress area to be identified during pre-start
MEDIUM LOW  TMI
risk of vehicle collisions  Work Crews to contact TC prior to exit/entry
 TC
 Access protocol to be identified during pre-start
Safe access to worksite compromised – site   PCBU
 Work Crews to contact TC prior to exit/entry
traffic unable to exit traffic stream safely without MEDIUM LOW  TMI
 Tapers and Signage for motorist direction & Warning
compromising workers on site.  TC
 PCBU & TMI to conduct site drive through prior to pre-start
to evaluate site conditions
 PCBU & TMI to communicate with any adjacent worksite
Excessive queue lengths or delays due to
prior to any TC Implementation to coordinate work activities  PCBU
adjacent works – negative impact on road LOW if required LOW  TMD
network performance or end queue collisions  TMD to be contacted & advised of situation to provide  TMI
guidance and support
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 PCBU to supply accurate worksite information prior to
Excessive worksite length or amount of work
design  TMD
areas – negative impact on network performance MEDIUM LOW
 TMD assessment of worksite & suitable design  TMI
/ excessive delays.  Worksite kept to minimum lengths required
  Prior notification to residents of upcoming works
Compromised access to adjoining properties –
 TMD to prescribe access egress controls on TGS or site   TMD
restricted access causing loss of business or LOW LOW
operation  TMI
personal access.  Adequate staff to be allocated to manage residential access
 Existing infrastructure for vulnerable road users to be  PCBU
Vulnerable road users unable to pass site safely
maintained at all times.  TMD
on existing pathways – Vulnerable users at risk of LOW LOW
 Traffic Controllers to assist with safe thoroughfare as  TMI
conflict with vehicular traffic. required.  All TC’s
 Prior notification to residents of work  PCBU
Detours for vulnerable road users too long
 TMD to prescribe access egress controls on TGS or site  TMD
creating unnecessary impact – risk of physical or N/A
operation documents  TMI
emotional distress to user.  Adequate staff to be allocated to manage safe thoroughfare  TC
Unfamiliar or illegible paths used for vulnerable  PCBU
 Alternate routes to be adequately delineated and signed to
road user detours – Users at risk of misdirection N/A  TMD
ensure ease of use
from guidance.  TMI
Surfaces not adequate for prams, wheelchairs,  PCBU
 Provisions provided to be to the same standard as existing
elderly, and school children – Users at risk of N/A  TMD
facilities to ensure safe access for all users
slips, trips & falls.  TMI
  Work scheduled to minimise impact
 Suitable alternative to be designed into worksite setup by  PCBU
Safe school crossing practices compromised by
TMD  TMD
works – Users at risk of exposure to vehicular N/A
 Appropriate warning signage to be erected on approach’s  TMI
traffic.  Additional staff where required to assist with safe  All TC’s
thoroughfare
 Work scheduled to minimise impact to network  PCBU
 Temporary stops/routes to be implemented as approved by
Bus stops or routes within work area – public  TMD
N/A network administrator
transport services interrupted  Advance notice to patrons of disruptions
 TMI
 Additional staff as required to manage diversions  TC
Inadequate Lane widths or turning availability for LOW  Lane widths to be maintained where practicable or LOW  PCBU
oversize/over dimension vehicles – worksite alternative routes utilised  TMD
intrusion / TTM device destruction & network  Swept path to be conducted where required to determine  TMI
blockages. suitability of proposed design  TC
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
 Approval and advance notification of detours
 Conflict points identified on TMP/TGS and discussed at pre-
start
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 PCBU
 Emergency services to be notified of works prior to works
Delays to emergency services travelling through  TMD
MEDIUM  Emergency Service vehicles will ALWAYS have priority LOW
the site – negative impact on response times  TMI
through worksite
 TC
 Traffic impact assessment to be conducted prior to selecting
Volume of detoured traffic having an
option  PCBU
unacceptable impact on surrounding areas - risk N/A
 Detours to be designed to prevent vehicle crossovers  TMD
of network blockages. causing delays (i.e., left turn only routes)
 Designer to ensure suitable advance warning & delineation
Removal of options for road users (Lane /Road guidance prior to works  PCBU
Closures) – Risk of driver frustration & non- MEDIUM  Clear signage for road users to see lane closure LOW  TMD
compliance and/or misdirection.  Regular signage checks  TMI

 Designs to include advance warning

 PCBU
Compromised legibility of traffic control devices  Routes to be clearly signed
 TMD
for road users – Risk of trafficable path deviations MEDIUM  Equipment checks to be conducted prior to deployment LOW
 Assets Team
& site intrusion.  Regular sign/device checks
 TMI

Site distance or visibility compromised on  TMD to be consulted if signs need to be adjusted outside of
 PCBU
approach for road users due to signage tolerances due to visibility
MEDIUM LOW  TMD
placement – inappropriate driver reactions or  Regular sign/device checks
 TMI
non-compliance.
 Ensure signage does not conflict with permanent posted
Conflict in signage compromising legibility of  PCBU
signage
worksite - inappropriate driver reactions or non- MEDIUM  Conflicting signs to be covered or removed
LOW  TMD
compliance.  TMI
 Regular sign/device checks
 Designer to assess appropriate speed options (implement
reduction if required)
  Ensure traffic control sign & devices are clearly visible to all  PCBU
Road users traveling at inappropriate speeds for road users  TMI
works undertaken – risk of accident-causing MEDIUM  Vehicles, Workers & TC’s located clear of travel path LOW  TMD
injury, property damage or death.  TC
 All TC’s
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
Works incorrectly scheduled (traffic volumes not  PCBU & TMD to assess work method options
 PCBU
considered) – negative impact to network MEDIUM  Confirm suitable times with asset owner LOW
 TMD
operations / network blockages.  Work scheduled to reduce impact on network
Incorrectly trained/non-accredited staff – work  Evidence of competency to be verified  PCBU
site non-compliance resulting in injury, property MEDIUM  Work inductions to be completed LOW  Op’s Team
damage or death.  Work pre-start meeting to be conducted  TMI
 Fit for Duty check conducted at pre-start  PCBU
 Staff fatigue - work site non-compliance resulting
MEDIUM  Welfare checks during shift LOW  Op’s Team
in injury, property damage or death
 Adequate staff allocated for daily tasks  TMI
Incorrect P.P.E. for shift (inc. adequate food &  PCBU
water) – dehydration/starvation/sun protection LOW  PPE checks prior to & throughout shift LOW  Op’s Team
leading to fatigue.  TMI
 PCBU
 Designer to generate manifest for Op’s & Assets Teams
Incorrect signage & devices – non-compliant  TMD
MEDIUM  Vehicle stock confirmed & loaded LOW
worksite establishment and management.  Op’s Team
 TMI to check available resources prior to implementation
 TMI
Application of incorrect or expired
 Correct specifications to be confirmed prior to design  PCBU
specifications, standards, rules and LOW LOW
 Suitability reviews prior to submission  TMD
policies
Older works contractually governed by
 Specifications to be confirmed with PCBU by TMD prior to  PCBU
older standards, roles, LOW LOW
design  TMD
specifications and/or policies
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT
OTHER. (Residual Risks to be assessed on site by PCBU representative & TMI at pre-start)
Potential Safety Risks; Risk Rating Responsible Party
Control Measures; to be Implemented to mitigate the Residual Risk
Identify all risks associated with the work that (Using above (Who will manage
identified risk (Using above Matrix)
pose a threat to the safety of the site Matrix) controls)
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS

OPTION TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
Two way side-track to be constructed past the
granted for the construction of a side
work area to allow traffic to flow in both
Side-track (Around) track NOT FEASIBLE
directions. Additional access points required
 Would add additional costs to the
for side roads
project
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
 Work area is a multilane road only
direction of travel with adequate
Contraflow (Around) slow lane will be closed, traffic can be NOT POSSIBLE
delineation/separation to permit the use of a
diverted to fast lane.
single side of the carriageway
Affected road area to be closed with access
 Fast lane traffic can be maintained
Detour (Around) permitted via the use of alternative local NOT SUITABLE
past the site
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing  Would expose traffic and workers to
carriageway where work will take place with additional risks
Traffic through the Worksite NOT APPLICABLE
advance warning and speed restrictions  Not physically possible due to patch
imposed repair
 Lane Closure can be performed to
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate allow access past the site whilst work
work areas whilst permitting flow in both is being conducted
Traffic past the Worksite ADOPTED
directions under traffic control using a single  Traffic Controllers will be required to
trafficable lane assist with safe thoroughfare past the
site
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

HEAVY VEHICLE TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS

OPTION TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
Two way side-track to be constructed past
granted for the construction of a side
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
Side-track (Around) track NOT FEASIBLE
directions. Additional access points required
 Would add additional costs to the
for side roads
project
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
 Work area is a multilane road only
direction of travel with adequate
Contraflow (Around) slow lane will be closed, traffic can be NOT POSSIBLE
delineation/separation to permit the use of
diverted to fast lane.
a single side of the carriageway
Affected road area to be closed with access
 Fast lane traffic can be maintained
Detour (Around) permitted via the use of alternative local NOT SUITABLE
past the site
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing  Would expose traffic and workers to
carriageway where work will take place with additional risks
Traffic through the Worksite NOT APPLICABLE
advance warning and speed restrictions  Not physically possible due to patch
imposed repair
 Lane Closure can be performed to
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate allow access past the site whilst work
work areas whilst permitting flow in both is being conducted
Traffic past the Worksite ADOPTED
directions under traffic control using a single  Traffic Controllers will be required to
trafficable lane assist with safe thoroughfare past the
site
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

PUBLIC TRANSPORT TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS

OPTION TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
Two way side-track to be constructed past
granted for the construction of a side
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
Side-track (Around) track NOT FEASIBLE
directions. Additional access points required
 Would add additional costs to the
for side roads
project
Traffic swapped to lanes in the opposite
 Work area is a multilane road only
direction of travel with adequate
Contraflow (Around) slow lane will be closed, traffic can be NOT POSSIBLE
delineation/separation to permit the use of
diverted to fast lane.
a single side of the carriageway
Affected road area to be closed with access
 Fast lane traffic can be maintained
Detour (Around) permitted via the use of alternative local NOT SUITABLE
past the site
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing  Would expose traffic and workers to
carriageway where work will take place with additional risks
Traffic through the Worksite NOT APPLICABLE
advance warning and speed restrictions  Not physically possible due to patch
imposed repair
 Lane Closure can be performed to
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate allow access past the site whilst work
work areas whilst permitting flow in both is being conducted
Traffic past the Worksite ADOPTED
directions under traffic control using a single  Traffic Controllers will be required to
trafficable lane assist with safe thoroughfare past the
site
 TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEME RISK ASSESSEMENT

VULNERABLE ROAD USERS TRAFFIC OPTIONS ANALYSIS

OPTION TREATMENT POSSIBILITIES FEASIBILITY / CONSTRAINTS OPTION ACCEPTANCE
 No designs or approval have been
Two way side-track to be constructed past
granted for the construction of a side
the work area to allow traffic to flow in both
Side-track (Around) track NOT FEASIBLE
directions. Additional access points required
 Would add additional costs to the
for side roads
project
Affected road area to be closed with access
 Fast lane traffic can be maintained
Detour (Around) permitted via the use of alternative local NOT POSSIBLE
past the site
roads
Traffic permitted to utilise the existing  Would expose traffic and workers to
carriageway where work will take place with additional risks
Traffic through the Worksite NOT APPLICABLE
advance warning and speed restrictions  Not physically possible due to patch
imposed repair
 Lane Closure can be performed to
Shoulder, Verge & Lane Closures to isolate allow access past the site whilst work
work areas whilst permitting flow in both is being conducted
Traffic past the Worksite ADOPTED
directions under traffic control using a single  Traffic Controllers will be required to
trafficable lane assist with safe thoroughfare past the
site