FAR EASTERN UNIVERSITY – MANILA

Nicanor Reyes St, Sampaloc, Manila, 1008 Metro Manila

School Year 2021 – 2022

FA4: Written Dialogue

By:
Ramina Luzares
Angelo Mañalac
Jerrico Von A. Miguel
Erykah Gheil Orsolino
Rhonel Miko Parro

Submitted to:
Jose Mathew Murillo Roble
 RSQCC Guidelines for Climate Change

Recall - Adaptive capacity in climate change.

Summarize - Climate change is a big deal to us. That is why we have seen the initial
consequences, both positive and bad, such as the numerous benefits for the growth of
communities and citizens, the tangible impact on people's lives, and the fact that it makes us
happy and active but also has a negative effect to our health however, we have an adaptability
option in climate change that will enquire monetary resources, public infrastructure, and
education that will enlighten the public about legal structures in increasing awareness about this
issue.

Question - Is it true that adapting to a new way of life in a changing environment requires
adjusting to a predicted future climate?

Comment - Adaptation is the most effective method for dealing with climate change; it is one of
the methods for dealing with the effects of climate change and avoiding harm. The rate of
climate change accelerates as a result of this challenge. As a result, we should limit greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions because they remove the gas from the environment.

Connect - Adaptation, in our opinion, serves a significant role because it can help in the
reduction of climate risks such as susceptibility and exposure. To strengthen their ability to
adapt to change, people require improved information or actions. We must put forth effort in
order to reduce risk to a level that is manageable. We should be aware of our current position
and understand the shift by being willing and flexible to accept change because it is for our own
good, and climate change is inevitable.

Recall - Eradication of Fossil fuels to lessen the world’s pollution

Summarize - Fossil fuels are one of the main reasons for climate change. If we stop using
fossil fuels, the Earth will become a better world. It is absolutely essential that we take a bold
step in the coming decade to phase out fossil fuels completely and transition to 100 percent
renewable energy sources. (Donaghy, T. 2019)

Question - Can alternative energy effectively replace fossil fuels?

Comment - Eliminating fossil fuels will make our world better. It will take many years to
successfully eliminate it and if we achieve that then it will benefit us. We can use alternative
energy in our everyday life in the future. We will just wait for the companies to invent a product
that will help us in our everyday life and run it through electricity.

Connect - I think it can effectively replace fossil fuels but not for now because we are short in
terms of funds. In the future I think it will become successful because many companies will start
inventing a product that can run through alternative energy. For now, only car companies are
the only companies that have a product that can run without using fossil fuels.
Recall - Plastic waste removal to save the environment

Summarize - Plastics are the main reason for many accumulated waste. It takes years to
decompose a plastic. If we are able to eliminate the use of plastic, we can help our environment
to become better. Thus, removing plastic waste will help lessen the harm in wildlife. “Plastic kills
millions of creatures every year, including birds, fish, and other marine critters.” (Parker, L.
2019)

Question - How plastic accumulation prevention helps in prevention of climate change?

Comment - Plastic waste removal will help in dealing with climate change. Plastic will take
years to be decomposed. If we are able to stop the use of plastic, we can change the world.
There are a lot of alternative ways to replace plastic like using paper bags or eco bags.

Connect - Nowadays, malls replace plastic with eco bags and paper bags. This has already
had an effect on our environment. But some people do not actually have knowledge on how to
properly segregate plastics. They used to burn plastics which release toxic substances that can
harm the environment. We need to enlighten people on how to properly manage segregating
plastics and encourage them not to use plastic.

Recall - Maintaining the Existence of Fossil Fuel Companies

Summarize - Shell, a major oil company, has recently invested heavily in renewable energy.
They realized they had to act quickly based on expert predictions and their own internal
analysis. To achieve its net-zero energy business target by 2050, the company is now
integrating “Powering Progress” which focuses on setting short-term and interim targets. A value
chain approach can help develop sustainable aviation fuels and increase EV charging capacity
at retail locations. Finally, Shell is committed to halving absolute emissions under its
operational control by 2030. (Segal, M. 2021) Lastly, fossil fuels have benefited everyone, and
their changing ways indicate a positive shift.

Question - What is it about fossil fuels that makes it so difficult to give them up?

Comment - My only comment is that, while it is morally correct to oppose fossil fuel companies
because they continue to endanger our planet, but people needed heat, electricity, food,
communication, and transportation, and purchased them. It's hypocritical to condemn fossil
fuels when they still benefit people globally. We're all part of the problem, but I'm aware that
fossil fuel companies are going green. One solution is for businesses to invest in renewable
energy and use profits to develop eco-friendly solutions. Make no mistake, speaking up helped
convince fossil fuel companies to change their ways and accept responsibility for their actions.

Connect - Let's face it: fossil fuels have shaped our world. Fossil fuels have helped advance
civilization while also powering our homes, factories, and cars. Climate change is a shared
responsibility shared by fossil fuel companies and consumers.  However, I am pleased to learn
that there are a positive course of action and policies regarding the use of fossil fuels. The only
way forward is for businesses worldwide to commit to increasing their reliance on renewable
energy and reinvesting their profits in research and development of environmentally friendly
solutions.

Recall - Lack of Motivation in addressing Environmental Crisis

Summarize - We as people of the earth are accountable for whatever action that we do in
protecting our natural habitat. We may have all the rights and means to modify, change or
improve our way of living but we do have to acknowledge that we do have responsibility in
taking care of it and all our actions have to accord with natural law.

Question - Why are humans not motivated enough to help and raise awareness of our
environmental situation ?

Comment - It’s hard to persuade people and take action to such things as environmental crises
when they do not see, feel it, and they’re threatened by it yet, unless you show them empirical
evidence that would at least change their mind in addressing the concern (Markman, 2018). It
shows the fact that we rely hardly on our personal instincts before we take actions instead of
being environmentally aware of the current phenomena

Connect - Many people are too busy with personal matters to help raise awareness about
environmental issues such as eradicating what causes climate change. We are aware of these
movements that promote protection and education, but we do not contribute much to them. Our
generation does not care about these issues; we just like and share posts on social media; this
does not help as its not enough, but at least doing something for a change would be great. It's
an obligation to live, not a right. Let's not wait for a life-altering event to change our future.

Recall - Less developed countries face a significant challenge when it comes to going green.

Summarize - The new vision that everyone wants to accomplish which is going green sounds
fantastic, but it is completely unrealistic. The fight against climate change has included
promoting sustainability. But, because it is difficult, not everyone agrees. The poorer, developing
countries' economies are more reliant on natural resources and endure the consequences of
global warming, making it "a question of survival for them," according to Dr. Schneegans. (Gill,
B. V. 2021). Going green and benefiting the environment as a whole is easy to think about but
hard to implement. Transitioning into this type of environment will be punishing and difficult for
underdeveloped countries because they are used to using cheap alternatives that are
considered "harmful" to the environment.

Question - How can we shift or transition to clean energy quickly and economically, if there are
still countries who are underdeveloped, impoverished etc.?

Comment - That said, I understand how important it is to understand the various aspects that
each individual should implement in their lifestyle to help combat climate change, but it will be
difficult. I must stop using natural gas-powered transportation and stop consuming dairy and
meat products, for example, contribute to climate change via greenhouse gas emissions from
dairy cows and their manure. (WWF, n.d.) As a result, everything I do daily contributes to
environmental destruction, and changing my ways now will be the most difficult challenge I face
but I am ready to do.

Connect - I believe that developing countries will face significant obstacles in transitioning to a
more environmentally friendly way of life and a greener environment, owing to the fact that it is
both costly and difficult to achieve. Climate change is the single greatest obstacle to achieving
sustainable development, threatening to plunge millions of people into severe poverty.

Talking Point 1 : Adaptive capacity in climate change.

Person 1: Are there any advantages in Climate Changes? Even if we adjust our methods, it
appears that we do not notice the improvements since they are still insufficient.

Person 2: It is beneficial to our earth for plants to grow healthier in the presence of increased
carbon dioxide levels in order to absorb nature, allowing us to lessen how people consume.

Person 1: Alright, what about social benefits? Climate changes don't help with the benefits of
our economy and for the environment.

Person 2: Reliable energy production supplies implies it can minimize its reliance on imported
oil and gas while also being less sensitive to rising oil prices since, instead of utilizing fossil
fuels, we will produce energy from renewable sources to protect the environment while also
growing the economy.

Person 1: uhm, I am still not convinced that climate change is really helping. Can you provide
more details about the topic?

Person 2: So far, climate change has aided more good than harm, and it is expected to continue
for the rest of this century. This problem can be solved by utilizing carbon capture, which entails
the reduction of carbon dioxide. This is a fantastic fit for our environment because it pertains to
the amount of carbon that will be reduced from the use of fossil fuels. We have adapted how we
tackle this issue throughout the years, and this modification has helped us to decrease the bad
impacts.

Person 1: What about adaptation, and how may it contribute to better human development
outcomes?

Person 2: The adaptation is for the benefit of everyone's health and to lessen the negative
impacts on persons and the environment. Adaptation entails modifying society and ecosystems
so that negative repercussions of future climate change are less severe, and it aims to capitalize
on any beneficial benefits of global warming
Person 1: What ethical theory fits this issue?

Person 2: “A utilitarian approach can be implemented in many of the ongoing climate change
debates. It is easy to use in a wide variety of settings where transparency is important. And it
has the advantage of prioritizing human well-being looking into our future, complementing
analyses that call on historical responsibility for past emissions,” says Kevin Kuruc, an
economist at the University of Oklahoma. (Rutgers University, 2021)

Talking point 2: Eradication of Fossil fuels to lessen the world’s pollution

Person 1: Is it true that eliminating all fossil fuels will improve our world?

Person 2: Fossil fuels contribute greatly to global warming. One of the major drawbacks of non-
renewable energy sources is that they contribute to ozone depletion. Coal is the most climate-
damaging fuel because it contains the most harmful ignition items. (Met Group, n.d.) Without a
doubt, it will improve our world by reducing CO2 emissions. The use of fossil fuels will be
reduced, resulting in cleaner air for the environment.

Person 1:Is it more harmful to people if they eliminate it immediately rather than slowly burning
it?

Person 2: To be honest, removing it immediately harms people because scorching petroleum

derivatives releases large amounts of carbon dioxide into the air, harming ozone. Ozone-
depleting substances trap heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures. Currently, the
global temperature has risen by 1 degree Celsius. Food shortages, deteriorating health, and
destitution for many people worldwide are risks of warming above 1.5°C. (ClientEarth, 2020) But
they can turn it into renewable energy. Those rays will become their everyday power source.
That will have an impact on our planet, and we must be prepared for that, but once we get past
that hurdle, the world will improve dramatically.

Person 1: If we eliminate it, can we live without those fossil fuels? Can we continue our
everyday lives without it?

Person 2: Yes, we can convert them into renewable energy that we can use in our daily lives.
We can keep living our lives but we will have to make major changes. I believe we can eliminate
fossil fuels if and only if we are ready with substitute resources. We can only switch to
renewable energy if we have enough funds, because it is expensive, and billions of pesos may
not be enough to supply the entire world. The main goal should be to switch to renewable
energy for power, heating, cooling, and transportation. It will be difficult to replace fossil fuels
used in synthetic processing like plastics or composting, but it is possible with biomass (natural
material from plants and creatures). (Sims, R n.d.). The government should encourage people
to use renewable energy instead of fossil fuels and implement this kind of action as an
alternative. 
Person 1: If fossil fuels are totally gone, how about those who bought a product that can only
use gas or oil? And also those companies that produce coal, oil, and gas? I think they will not
allow it and they will find a way to continue their business.

Person 2: They were aware that regulations addressing the harmful effects of fossil fuels,
particularly on business owners, would soon phase them out. Businesses worldwide should
transition to a more eco-friendly alternative. I'm sure many businesses will object right away.
They are unprepared and uncertain about their ability to recover. They are also to blame for
global pollution, as they continue to abuse the production of fossil fuels, but it is preferable if we
simply stopped using them. Even if they lose a lot of money, I believe they will find a way to
benefit people and the environment in the future.

Person 1: So, you are saying that it is safe not using fossil fuels and start using renewable
energy?

Person 2: Yes, removing them will make our planet safer, but we should take whatever risks are
necessary if we burn it immediately. Non-renewable fossil fuels include coal, oil, and gas. When
copied, they emit carbon dioxide, an ozone depleting gas. Almost all of Antarctica's ice will melt
if we burn all remaining fossil fuels, potentially raising ocean levels by up to 200 feet, suffocating
major urban areas (M.B. Griggs, 2015). We can use renewable energy sources like solar energy
to power our homes for longer periods of time. Also, burning all fossil fuels now has many
advantages, but we are not looking forward to it because we only see the disadvantages.

Person 1: Are there any ethical theories that can fit in this issue?

Person 2: In this instance, utilitarianism is the most appropriate theory. As the problem worsens,
this theory examines the ultimate goal or outcome of a course of action, which is the eradication
of fossil fuels. As this theory encompasses the relationship between humans and the world in
which we live, we should take care of it for the greater good of all. As we all know, fossil fuels
are slowly destroying our planet due to the massive pollution they produce, which is why we
must limit their use to protect the environment and ensure cleaner electricity and air. When
fossil fuels are discontinued, the negative impact on human health diminishes. It also has a
significant impact on humans; when humans stop using fossil fuels, their lives and the
environment improve significantly. (Luzares, R. 2021)

Talking Point 3: Plastic waste removal to save the environment

Person 1: How can plastic waste removal help our environment?

Person 2: As can be seen, the majority of trash in the oceans is plastic. We can help support the
marine ecosystem in reducing the number of marine species that perish. Additionally, flooding is
primarily caused by plastic pollution. Plastic bags, bottles, and other items eventually end up in
canals, water reservoirs, and drains. They gradually become partially or completely blocked and
are unable to handle a large surge of water, increasing the risk of significant property damage
and even death. (Felt, C. 2020).

Person 1: Why do some people burn plastics instead of segregating it properly?

Person 2: It is mainly because many people do not know what would happen if they burn
plastics. Burning plastics will release toxic substances that cause thermal desolation. Many
people don't care about what might happen if they continue burning plastics waste. Everyone on
this planet is responsible for keeping the environment clean. Notably, these plastic wastes end
up in landfills, potentially causing a much bigger crisis. Proper waste segregation and disposal
can help save lives as well as reduce toxins released into the environment. (Gupta, A. 2021)

Person 1: Can you please elaborate on what might happen if this thing continues for more
years? I also don’t have any ideas on what will happen if people continue to use plastic and they
will not segregate it properly.

Person 2: Ocean plastic pollution is common and  now a global crisis. It has a major impact on
wildlife. Most animal deaths are due to entanglement or starvation. Many marine animals,
including seals and whales, become entangled in abandoned fishing gear or six-pack rings.
Micro plastics have been found in the tissues of over 100 aquatic species, including fish, shrimp,
and mussels. These microscopic particles are harmless when passed through the digestive
system and excreted. Plastics clog digestive systems and penetrate organs, but they also been
found to cause death. (Parker, L. 2019).

Person 1: Alright. What if plastics are gone? What are we gonna use for our daily living? Also,
what would happen to the world if plastic wasn’t invented?

Person 2: No plastic means less pollution and less deaths. Many marine species die from
plastic pollution. Forests would return to pre-industrial levels, while glaciers and rivers would
improve. Chemicals would not be able to escape into the seas and rivers, nor would they
contribute to air pollution. Plastic production, burning, and usage generate significant amounts
of CO2, which is released into the atmosphere. In addition to massive greenhouse gas
emissions, it also contributes to climate change. (Burns, M. 2019)  We wouldn't have as much
pollution if we didn't use plastic.  Plastic bags are being phased out in favor of eco-friendly
alternatives like eco bags and paper bags. Another example is the use of an eco-friendly plastic
straw.  As you can see, we have the ability to make a difference in the world.

Person 1: What do you think is the ethical theory that will most fit with this kind of issue?
Person 2: In this particular circumstance, a utilitarian approach will be relevant and timely. Due
to the fact that it contributes and requires individuals to take moral responsibility for climate
change. Everyone should make an effort to minimize their use and consumption of all types of
plastic. For instance, disposable plastic straws and bags are items that people use or rely on
because they are inexpensive add-ons to other consumer goods and not necessarily standalone
products. Their pleasure may be deemed lesser to the harm they cause to the environment,
ranging from micro plastic pollution to species extinction, as a result of their widespread
consumption and disposal. (Goodwine, K. 2019).

Talking Point 4: Maintaining the Existence of Fossil Fuel Companies

Person 2: How can you support a company whose number one goal is to provide problems for
everyone?

Person 1: Can you further elaborate what problems they cause? so you're implying that the
majority of people are at fault for exploiting and benefiting from their resources. Now, consider
your premise, if you believe that fossil fuel industries gas, oil, and coal are to blame for climate
change and still people all over the world rely on their products on a daily basis.

Person 2: Individuals must realize that their actions harm the environment and contribute to a
major issue. After reading several articles , it became clear that fossil fuels are a major
contributor to global climate change. Automobiles are one of the most common modes of
transportation used globally, contributing to the problem of fossil fuels. Vehicles pollute and emit
greenhouse gases. The accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is raising global
temperatures. (B. Davis, 2021)

Person 1: You're implying that people should stop buying gas from companies like Shell
because it's bad for the environment. People are unable to stop themselves from acquiring
fossil fuels. I completely understand why they keep using it because fossil fuels are the
cheapest. Stavins argues that effective climate policies target the demand side of the market,
primarily consumers, rather than just corporations. Additionally, oil companies are diversifying
their businesses by producing natural gas, which is a significant step toward the world
transitioning to renewable energy sources. As the world transitions to renewable energy sources
the effect of a change will have a significant impact in the world. (Hyman, E. 2020)

Person 2: Yes, I see they are moving towards greener alternatives, which I applaud but by
switching to greener alternatives now and living sustainably, we can slow down climate change
quickly.

Person 1: Again, not everyone can afford or access clean energy. The high cost of renewable
energy is the primary obstacle. Do you think a Filipino family could instantly switch to a more
eco-friendly energy source or environment? You can't make all these demands without
considering those who can't. Also, Shell wants to achieve its net-zero energy business target by
2050, “Powering Progress” mainly investing in renewable and clean energy.  A value chain
approach can help develop sustainable aviation fuels and increase EV charging capacity at
retail locations. Finally, Shell is committed to halving absolute emissions under its operational
control by 2030. (Segal, M. 2021) 

Person 2: You are unwilling to change your ideology despite the fact that you are aware that it is
harmful to everyone?
Person 1: I am not speaking for everyone who continues to use or benefits from fossil fuels;
rather, what I am attempting to convey is that I have the right to choose the source of my coal,
followed by oil and natural gas, that allows for rapid growth in industrial processes, agriculture,
and transportation. Thus, right-based theory demonstrates my ideology by arguing that a
democratic society must protect individuals while also being permitted to pursue their own
personal goals and and live their lives in a manner consistent with environmental ethics. (United
Nations Population Fund. n.d.). The fact that companies like Shell are now switching to cleaner
alternatives is a great step forward. That is, if we eliminate fossil fuel companies, all their efforts
to find cleaner alternatives will be wasted. Also, if we simply stop using fossil fuels, billions of
people will lose their jobs.

Talking Point 5: Lack of Global Initiatives and Individual Action

Person 2: Do we even have laws or policies in place that our government can follow in the event
of an environmental disaster? Isn't it obvious that no one actually cares about it?

Person 1: That's what I'm talking about; our ignorance is about to kill us all. It may not be now,
but sooner or later, we will suffer and no longer be able to live as we once did.

Person 2: I'm not sure I understand?

Person 1: You're not going to succeed! Unless you read a few articles about the global
environmental crisis. According to the United Nations from the report of Rott (2021) on climate
impacts, our climate crisis is gradually worsening and is unavoidable. It's a silent killer that you
won't notice right now, but we'll be suffering soon. We must act now because the climate
change crisis reduces our chances of survival and we may have difficulty adapting to it. Neither
a large sum of money nor social media awareness will suffice.

Person 2: I think we people are too ignorant to understand that the climate crisis exists because
we do not evidently feel it and we are still threatened by it. Yes, this could be similar to
typhoons, hurricanes, and other natural calamities but I feel like we don’t take it seriously. We
ought to think that it’s common to have these natural disasters. The future has always appeared
to be more uncertain than the present. That is one of the reasons why people place such a
significant importance on the present. (Markman, 2018) We have this mentality that we won’t
live that long and we won’t be able to experience these. It is too selfish for us to think just for
ourselves because of the idea of “We only live once”.

Person 1: We all have the right and freedom to think about ourselves and how we will survive on
a daily basis, but it is not morally acceptable to be selfish. We all live under the same sky, so
why don't we band together and let the world know how bad things have gotten?

The next issue is that people focus on short-term gains that benefit them now rather than
investing in something that benefits everyone in the long run. This human mentality has resulted
in more crises, not just in terms of the environment.
Person 2: Okay, I see what you're saying. Something popped into my head. Do you know of any
environmental agreements or initiatives?

Person 1: Yes! One of the well-known is the Paris Treaty, which is an agreement between
nations in addressing the issue of climate change as per the United Nations. In fact, from the
United Nations report “Zero-carbon solutions are becoming competitive across economic
sectors representing 25% of emissions.”

Person 2: Was it effective? And would this address our lack of motivation in taking action for
climate change?

Person 1: Somehow yes, we may not see the result of the agreement but this is a long term
process to fill in. It’s not easy to address environmental problems especially when politics and
private sectors are involved.

Also, I'd like to add that it's our individual responsibility, but it's also appropriate to take action,
even if it's on a small scale or scope. Let's start at home by practicing the 3Rs or joining a
school-wide environmental awareness movement. Much better if you have a better idea to unite
everyone to bring awareness, you could contribute these to an organization that raises
awareness and promotes environmental protection to help reduce crises in the future.

Talking Point 6: Less developed countries face a significant challenge when it comes to
going green.

Person 2: Everyone, I believe, should take a stand for climate justice, and please do not believe
that you are the problem here. Holding fossil fuel companies accountable is one of several steps
necessary for them to change their policies. International economic and political systems, as
well as infrastructure, are strongly intertwined with fossil fuels, owing to the fact that they all
profit enormously from it, and this is a system that is largely maintained by industry. Always
remember that they are capable of changing their ways yet they do not do it.

Person 1: As previously stated, companies such as Shell are transitioning to a more

environmentally friendly alternative, which is a good thing because it will contribute to the
positive transformation of the environment. The company has been examining ways to expedite
its energy transition strategy and achieve a greater reduction in carbon emissions. Additionally,
they would acquire renewable energy retailer Inspire Energy Capital LLC, as the European
looks to expand its renewable energy business in the US. (Krishna, R. 2021)

Person 2: I am delighted that big companies such as Shell are now changing their ways but we
all know that it is not enough we need everyone in the world to be on board with that plan. We
should take advantage of our important role as students and serve as the voice of our
generation, because we are the future. Greta Thunberg's UN speech was inspiring, and we
should all take note of what she has to say.
Person 1: Could you please elaborate on Greta Thunberg's activism, as I am unfamiliar with
her?

Person 2: She is a Swedish girl who skipped school as a 15-year-old in order to demonstrate
outside the Swedish parliament, calling for increased action against climate change. Could you
believe her commitment?

Person 1:That is truly amazing and inspirational. I believe that we could all learn from her.

Person 2: Yes, her UN speech was full of sincerity and truth. The way she stood firm and
chastised world leaders for not doing enough to combat climate change. Her speech served as
a wake-up call for us all, and I wholeheartedly agree. Her main point was that world leaders
have stolen everyone's dreams, especially the youth's. She also stated that climate change is
killing people and destroying ecosystems. However, world leaders continue to be blind to the
issue and do nothing to solve it; in fact, they contribute to it by supporting businesses that harm
the environment in order to generate revenue and profit from their growth economically.
(Gajanan, M. 2019). I believe that her appeal to world leaders to act will serve as a catalyst for
change.

Person 1: But, after doing some research on my own, I discovered that not all world leaders are
pleased with her speech, as President Vladimir Putin said it is not suitable for all. He is also
correct that forcing African and Asian nations to adopt solar panels and other technologies is
unrealistic at this time. People from third world countries living in Africa or many Asian countries
desire the same level of wealth and comfort as those in Sweden, which President Vladimir Putin
explained to everyone that no one explained to Greta (Reuters. 2020). In fact, Greta Thunberg's
message is about how he called out world leaders who have done nothing. To my knowledge,
she raises valid concerns but offers no solutions. I can say that she has the freedom to express
herself. Also integrating the rights-based theory holds that all humans have certain rights, both
positive and negative, simply by virtue of being human. Adopting rights-based methods to
conservation and climate action will enable cost-effective prices. (Corpuz, V. T., et al, 2020) As
a result, progressing in this environment will be difficult for developing countries, which is why
we need to be more understanding of what they are going through. The only thing we can do is
assist and educate them in this area.

Climate change and its impact

In the long run, climate change and human impact on the environment are serious
issues. Human-made pollutants have become a major environmental issue. Regrettably, this
critical issue has become globally politicized, with no effective solutions. International
agreements and national legislation must be incorporated to reduce human impact on the
planet.

We won't be able to completely eliminate fossil fuel supply, but reducing our reliance on
them will help. Our fossil-fuel solutions must be innovative and immediately implementable. We
can also use technology to ensure fossil fuels' long-term viability. Also, fossil fuel companies
must immediately invest in renewable energy sources. Businesses with significant expertise and
resources may be able to help us transition faster. This solution will be made possible through
our nation's collective action, with a particular emphasis on youth. Significant changes are
required in order for people's morality to have a positive effect on our environment.

We used the utilitarian principle to solve environmental issues because it is a simple way
to determine the morally correct course of action. Equality, the environment, and the well-being
of all humans benefit from a utilitarian global climate policy. (Santa Clara University. 2014)
Among these actions is expanding environmental and moral ethics in academia. It will help our
legislators and state leaders advocate for environmental protection and prevention in the face of
climate change devastation. Utilitarianism ensures that empirical practices help us make moral
and ethical decisions and take action for the planet. (Wolff, B. n.d.)

Insight: Talking Point 1:

We've been dealing with climate change for a long time, and we're familiar with how to prepare
for the changes that are inevitable. While some may believe this is normal because it occurs in
cycles, adapting means taking action in response to both the current effects of climate change
and anticipated future impacts. We require adaptation because it is a necessary step toward
mitigating the detrimental effects of climate change that cannot be avoided.

Insight: Talking Point 2:

We are all aware that fossil fuels are a significant contributor to climate change. Excessive use
of it has the potential to destroy our planet in the future, affecting not only the planet but also all
of us. Numerous businesses are unaware of the consequences of their actions and will regret it
if this disaster continues to deteriorate. I propose that instead of fossil fuels, we should use
renewable energy because it is more reliable and has the potential to have a positive impact on
our planet. As a student, I believe that if we completely stop or eliminate fossil fuels, the world
will become more sustainable and better.

Insight: Talking Point 3

As we can see, plastic pollution has a significant negative impact on our environment. Perhaps
for the time being, people will not feel the effects of plastic pollution, but when the time comes,
we will see just how bad the effects are. As far as I can tell, we must take action on this matter
immediately. We need to educate people about the consequences of continuing to use plastic.
Saving the environment is equivalent to saving one's self.

Insight: Talking Point 4

We are putting too much CO2 into the atmosphere, causing the climate crisis. The majority is
due to land use and fossil fuel use. We are aware of the situation and that we must stop. The
problem is that many people have continued to use them this past few years because it easy
and cheap to obtain. Renewable energy sources, which have proven to be a viable alternative
to fossil fuels, are expected to play an increasing role in the mix of energy generation over the
next century.

Insight: Talking Point 5

Selfishness and the idea of living in the moment prevent us humans from taking action to the
environmental crisis for we think that it won’t affect us now. We may not feel the worst yet but
will worsen as we let ourselves be driven away by ignorance. It is important for us to be fully
aware of empirical evidence and data in proving that we are already experiencing climate
change. It may be slow but it is gradually destroying us in a way that we won’t be able to notice.
It is our responsibility to at least educate ourselves and escape from ignorance that keeps us
away from being accountable and responsible for our natural habitat.

Insight: Talking Point 6

People's behavior must change in order to transition to a greener environment. The majority of
people agree that climate change is real and that action is required now. However, few people
are willing to make the significant lifestyle changes required to combat climate change. In
addition to reducing meat consumption, people should avoid using fossil fuels, avoid products
that contain large amounts of plastic or are single-use, and repair rather than replace broken
appliances. The following factors may help reduce the harmful effects of fossil fuels. While not
every country can adopt this lifestyle, we must understand what motivates them and what they
can do to help the environment. Developing countries cannot be left out of the fight against
climate change.

References:

Bousso, R. D. Z. (2019, October 15). Exclusive: No choice but to invest in oil, Shell CEO says.

U.S. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-shell-climate-

exclusive/exclusive-no-choice-but-to-invest-in-oil-shell-ceo-says-idUSKBN1WT2JL

Davis, B. (2021, May 8). How are fossil fuels harmful to the environment? – MVOrganizing.

MVOrganizing. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://www.mvorganizing.org/how-are-fossil-

fuels-harmful-to-the-environment/#How_are_fossil_fuels_harmful_to_the_environment

Hyman, E. (2020, January 2). Who’s Really Responsible for Climate Change? Harvard Political

Review. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://harvardpolitics.com/climate-change-

responsibility/
United Nations Population Fund. (n.d.). The Human Rights-Based Approach. Retrieved

November 5, 2021, from https://www.unfpa.org/human-rights-based-approach

World Wildlife. (n.d.). Dairy | Industries | WWF. World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved November 5,

2021, from https://www.worldwildlife.org/industries/dairy

Krishna, R. (2021, July 27). Shell to buy Inspire Energy in green energy push. Nasdaq.

Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/shell-to-buy-inspire-energy-

in-green-energy-push-2021-07-27

Gajanan, M. (2019, September 23). “You Have Stolen My Dreams and My Childhood”: Greta

Thunberg Gives Powerful Speech at UN Climate Summit. Time. Retrieved November 5, 2021,

from https://time.com/5684216/greta-thunberg-un-climate-action-summit-climate-speech/

Reuters. (2020, July 6). ‘Go explain to developing countries’: Putin criticises Greta Thunberg’s

UN speech. Hindustan Times. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/explain-developing-countries-russia-s-vladimir-

putin-criticises-greta-thunberg-s-un-speech/story-uX1nci8oZNSAKnSwNDgkNL.html

Markman, A. (2021, September 9).Why people aren't motivated to address climate change.

Harvard Business Review. Retrieved November 6, 2021, from https://hbr.org/2018/10/why-

people-arent-motivated-to-address-climate-change.

Neuman, S. (2021, November 4). Earth has 11 years to cut emissions to avoid dire climate

scenarios, a report says. NPR. Retrieved November 6, 2021, from

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/04/1052267118/climate-change-carbon-dioxide-emissions-global-

carbon-budget.

United Nations. (n.d.). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Climate Change. Retrieved

November 7, 2021, from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-

agreement?fbclid=IwAR1G7FabbN74BsX20nB82FAaI7ikvsoixdKbT-aFCtX4ntwWktsv560QetM
Rott, N. (2021, November 4). The U.N. says climate impacts are getting worse faster than the

world is adapting. NPR. Retrieved November 7, 2021, from

https://www.npr.org/2021/11/04/1052112717/the-u-n-says-climate-impacts-are-getting-worse-

faster-than-the-world-is-adapting.

Parker, L. (2021, May 3). The world’s plastic pollution crisis explained. Environment. Retrieved

November 7, 2021, from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/plastic-

pollution

Donaghy, T. (2019, September 20). 8 reasons why we need to phase out the fossil fuel industry.

Greenpeace USA. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from

https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/research/8-reasons-why-we-need-to-phase-out-the-fossil-fuel-

industry/

ClientEarth Communications. (2021, October 18). Fossil fuels and climate change: the facts.

ClientEarth. Retrieved November 6, 2021, from https://www.clientearth.org/latest/latest-

updates/stories/fossil-fuels-and-climate-change-the-facts/

Felt, C. (2019, January 29). Plastic Waste: Environmental Effects of Plastic Pollution. Thrive

Global. Retrieved November 7, 2021, from https://thriveglobal.com/stories/plastic-waste-

environmental-effects-of-plastic-pollution/

Rutgers University (2021) Utilitarian Approach to Global Climate Policy Leads to Better

Outcomes” Retrieved November 8, 2021, from https://www.labmanager.com/news/utilitarian-

approach-to-global-climate-policy-leads-to-better-outcomes-26690

Strom, C. (2021, April 9). Difference between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation.

Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from

http://www.differencebetween.net/science/difference-between-climate-change-adaptation-and-

mitigation/.
Climate Change (2003) “Adaptation and adaptive capacity, to lessen health impacts” Retrieved

November 6, 2021, from https://www.who.int/globalchange/environment/en/chapter11.pdf

Corfee-Morlot, J. (2019, January 15). 4 Ways to Shift from Fossil Fuels to Clean Energy. World

Resources Institute. Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://www.wri.org/insights/4-ways-

shift-fossil-fuels-clean-energy

Sims, R. (2020, June 2). Climate explained: could the world stop using fossil fuels today? The

Conversation. Retrieved November 6, 2021, from https://theconversation.com/climate-

explained-could-the-world-stop-using-fossil-fuels-today-138605

Griggs, M. B. (2021, April 26). What Would Happen If We Burned All The Fossil Fuels On

Earth? Popular Science. Retrieved November 6, 2021, from https://www.popsci.com/burning-all-

fossil-fuels-could-raise-sea-levels-by-200-feet/

Burns, M. (2019, October 4). What if Plastic Had Never Been Invented? Keeping Our Planet

Alive. Retrieved November 8, 2021, from https://keepingourplanetalive.ca/blogs/blog/what-if-

plastic-had-never-been-invented

Santa Clara University. (2014, August 14). Calculating Consequences:The Utilitarian Approach

to Ethics. Retrieved November 8, 2021, from

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/calculating-consequences-

the-utilitarian-approach/

Met Group. (n.d.). Pros and cons of fossil fuels & why can fossil fuels be good? group.met.com.

Retrieved November 5, 2021, from https://group.met.com/fyouture/pros-and-cons-of-fossil-

fuels/62

Gupta, A. (2021, October 30). importance of waste segregation: why should we segregate

waste. JustEco.Retrieved November 7, 2021, from https://justeco.in/importance-of-waste-

segregation/

Wolff, B. (n.d). Environmental Studies and Utilitarian Ethics. Volume 34(2) December 2008, 6-

11. Retrieved November 8, 2021, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ859824.pdf

Corpuz, V. T., Alcorn , J., Molnar, A., Healy, C., & Barrow , E. (2020, March 11). Adopting

rights-based approaches to enable cost-effective conservation and climate action. IUCN.

Retrieved November 8, 2021, from https://www.iucn.org/news/commission-environmental-

economic-and-social-policy/202003/adopting-rights-based-approaches-enable-cost-effective-

conservation-and-climate-action.

Goodwine, K. (2019). The Ethics of Single-Use Plastics. DePauw University. Retrieved

November 8, 2021, from https://scholarship.depauw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?

article=1104&context=studentresearch

Segal, M. (2021, October 29). Shell Pushes Back on Activist Investor Pressure to Split Fossil

Fuel and Clean Energy Businesses. ESG Today. Retrieved November 12, 2021, from

https://www.esgtoday.com/shell-pushes-back-on-activist-investor-pressure-to-split-fossil-

fuel-and-clean-energy-businesses/

United Nations. (n.d.). THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. United Nations. Department

of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development. Retrieved November 12,

2021, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals

Gill, B. V. (2021, June 11). Poorer nations “more focused on sustainability.” BBC News.

Retrieved November 12, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-

57432580

Rutgers University. (2021, September 13). Utilitarian approach to global climate policy improves

equity, environment and wellbeing. ScienceDaily.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/09/210913135754.htm