Twin Block Final
Twin Block Final
INTRODUCTION
Twin Blocks are constructed to a protrusive bite that effectively modifies the
occlusal inclined plane by means of acrylic inclined planes on occlusal bite
blocks.
The purpose is to promote protrusive mandibular function for correction of
the skeletal Class II malocclusion.
The occlusal inclined plane acts as a guiding mechanism causing the
mandible to be displaced downward and forward.
The unfavorable cuspal contacts of a distal occlusion are replaced by
favorable proprioceptive contacts on the inclined planes of the Twin Blocks
to correct the malocclusion and to free the mandible from its locked distal
functional position.
Twin Blocks are designed to be worn 24 hours per day.
Upper and lower bite blocks interlock at a 70° angle when engaged in full
closure. This causes a forward mandibular posture to an edge-to-edge
position with the upper anteriors.
In the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion, appliance design is
modified by the addition of sagittal screws to advance the upper anterior
teeth.
Control of the vertical dimension is achieved by sequentially adjusting the
thickness of the posterior occlusal inclined planes to control eruption.
Treatment of Class III malocclusion is achieved by reversing the occlusal
inclined planes to apply a forward component of force to the upper arch and
a downward and distal force to the mandible in the lower molar region.
The inclined planes are set at 70° to the occlusal plane with bite blocks
covering lower molars and upper deciduous molars or premolars, with
sagittal screws to advance the upper incisors.
PHILOSOPHY
The basic philosophy behind the twin block therapy was if the mandibular
inclined planes are in a distal relation to that of maxilla then the force acting
on the mandibular teeth will have a distal force vector leading to a class II
growth tendency. The aim of the twin block is to modify these inclined
planes and cause more favourable growth pattern. Secondly, since it could
be worn 24 hours, the masticatory forces can be transmitted via the
appliance to the dentition and then to the bony trabeculae thereby
influencing the rate of growth and the trabecular structure of the supporting
bone.
HISTORY
Orthodontic force
Fixed appliances are designed to apply light orthodontic forces that move
individual teeth. Schwarz (1932) defined the optimum orthodontic force as
28 g/cm2 of root surface.
By applying light forces with archwires and elastic traction, fixed appliances
do not specifically stimulate mandibular growth during treatment. A bracket
or “small handle” is attached to individual teeth. Pressure is then applied to
those teeth by ligating light wires to the brackets.
The resulting forces applied through the teeth to the supporting alveolar
bone must remain within the level of physiological tolerance of the
periodontal membrane to avoid damage to the individual teeth and/or their
sockets of alveolar bone.
Orthopedic force
Orthopedic force levels are not confined by the level of tolerance in the
periodontal membrane but rather by the much broader tolerance of the
orofacial musculature.
The forces of occlusion applied to opposing teeth in mastication are in the
range of 400–500 g and these forces are transmitted through the teeth to the
supporting bone. Occlusal forces form a major proprioceptive stimulus to
growth whereby the internal and external structure of supporting bone is
remodeled to meet the needs of occlusal function. This is effected by
reorganization of the alveolar trabecular system and by periosteal and
endochondral apposition.
The investigations of Graf (1961, 1975) and Witt & Komposch (1971) have
shown that for 1 mm of anterior displacement the forces of the stretched
retractor muscles amount to approximately 100 g. A construction bite of 5–
10 mm will therefore transmit considerable forces to the dentition through
the functional receptors.
Orthopedic forces would exceed the level of tolerance of the periodontal
tissues if applied to individual teeth. However, these forces are spread
evenly in the dental arches by appliances that are not designed to move
individual teeth, but to displace the entire mandible and promote adaptation
within the muscles of mastication.
The muscles are the prime movers in growth, and bony remodeling is related
to the functional requirements of muscle activity. The goal of functional
appliances is to elicit a proprioceptive response in the stretch receptors of the
orofacial muscles and ligaments and as a secondary response to influence the
pattern of bone growth correspondingly to support a new functional
environment for the developing dentition.
Orthopedic traction
Indications
Before Twin Blocks were developed, the author used extraoral traction with
removable appliances as a means of anchorage to retract upper buccal segments to
correct Class II malocclusion In the early years using Twin Blocks, tubes were
added to clasp for extraoral traction on the upper appliance to be worn at night so
as to reinforce the functional component for correction of a Class II buccal
segment relationship.
A vertical orthopedic force to the upper appliance applies an intrusive force to the
upper posterior teeth and palate, and limits downward maxillary growth. Intrusion
of the upper posterior teeth allows the bite to close by a favorable forward rotation
of the mandible, and facilitates correction of mandibular retrusion in vertical
growth discrepancies. The addition of traction is optional in reduced overbite
cases, and many cases respond well to treatment without traction. Traction is
indicated in severe discrepancies with vertical growth which are unfavorable for
functional correction. A vertical component of traction force is particularly
effective in controlling this type of malocclusion.
Vertical extraoral traction force to intrude upper posterior teeth
The Concorde facebow is adjusted so that it lies just below the level of the upper
lip at rest, with the ends of the outer bow sloping slightly upward above the level
of the inner bow. The resulting extraoral traction applies an upward component of
force that helps to retain the upper appliance.
Clinical examination
Photographic Records
Examination of models
Bite registration for Twin Blocks originally aimed for a single activation to
an edge-to-edge incisor relationship with 2 mm interincisal clearance for an
overjet of up to 10 mm. Allowance was made for individual variation if the
patient had difficulty in maintaining an edge-to-edge position on registering
the occlusion. This proved to be successful in correcting the overjet and
reducing the distal occlusion in the majority of cases.
Where the overjet was more than 10 mm, an initial advancement of 7 mm or
8 mm was followed by reactivation of the appliance after occlusion had
corrected to the initial bite registration. Normally, a single further activation
was sufficient to fully correct the overjet and distal occlusion. In the early
stages of using Twin Blocks it was noted that some patients had difficulty in
maintaining the forward posture and occluding correctly on the inclined
planes. These patients usually had a vertical growth pattern with weak
musculature and were unable to maintain the forward mandibular posture
consistently. They could bite registration for Twin Blocks originally aimed
for a single activation to an edge-to-edge incisor relationship with 2 mm
interincisal clearance for an overjet of up to 10 mm. Allowance was made
for individual variation if the patient had difficulty in maintaining an edge-
to-edge position on registering the occlusion. This proved to be successful in
correcting the overjet and reducing the distal occlusion in the majority of
cases. Where the overjet was more than 10 mm, an initial advancement of 7
mm or 8 mm was followed by reactivation of the appliance after occlusion
had corrected to the initial bite registration. Normally, a single further
activation was sufficient to fully correct the overjet and distal occlusion. In
the early stages of using Twin Blocks it was noted that some patients had
difficulty in maintaining the forward posture and occluding correctly on the
inclined planes. These patients usually had a vertical growth pattern with
weak musculature and were unable to maintain the forward mandibular
posture consistently.
They could be identified early in treatment as they tended to posture the
mandible back and meet the blocks together behind the inclined planes. This
difficulty can be avoided by relating bite registration to the patient’s freedom
of movement and by registering the protrusive path of the mandible.
The George bite gauge has a millimeter gauge to measure the protrusive
path of the mandible and to determine accurately the amount of activation
registered in the construction bite. The total protrusive movement is
calculated by first measuring the overjet in centric occlusion and then in the
position of maximum protrusion. The protrusive path of the mandible is the
difference between the two measurements. Functional activation within
normal physiological limit by checking the protrusive path the adjustment
may be related to the patient’s physiological movements.
The young patient usually has more freedom of movement while there is
generally more restriction in the adult. In Class II division 1 malocclusion,
young patients commonly have a protrusive path of 13 mm and will tolerate
activation up to 10 mm. Beyond this range the muscles and ligaments cannot
adapt to altered function and the patient will tend to posture out of the
appliance. If the overjet is larger than 10 mm the initial activation should
only partially reduce the overjet. The appliance is then reactivated during the
course of treatment
The George Bite Gauge has a millimeter gauge to measure the protrusive
path of the mandible
Labial Bow
The appliance prescription includes all the details required for correction of
the individual malocclusion, with specific instructions on appliance design,
including springs and screws to correct individual teeth, or segmental
correction by transverse and/or sagittal correction, to improve archform.
The delta clasp was designed by the author to improve the fixation of
Twin Blocks.
The delta clasp is similar to the Adams clasp (Adams, 1970) in
principle, but incorporates new features to improve retention, reduce
metal fatigue and minimize the need for adjustment.
The retentive loops were originally triangular in shape (from which
the name “delta” is derived), or alternatively the loops may be circular
or ovoid, both types having similar retentive properties.
In the permanent dentition, delta clasps are placed routinely on upper
first molars and on lower first premolars.
They may also be used on deciduous molars. Additional interdental
ball-ended clasps, finger clasps or C-shaped clasps may be placed to
improve retention and provide resistance to anteroposterior tipping.
Ball-ended clasps are routinely employed mesial to lower canines and
in the upper premolar or deciduous molar region to gain interdental
retention from adjacent teeth.
The delta Clasp
Appliances may either be made with heat cure or cold cure acrylic.
Heat cure acrylic has the advantage of additional strength and
accuracy. Making the appliances in wax first allows the blocks to be
formed with greater precision.
Cold cure acrylic has the advantage of speed and convenience, but
sacrifices something in strength and accuracy. It is essential to use a
top-quality cold cure acrylic to avoid problems with breakage,
especially in the later stages of treatment, after trimming the blocks to
allow eruption in treatment of deep overbite.
The inclined planes can lose their definition as a result of wear if a
soft acrylic is used.
1. Class II div 1 malocclusion with well aligned upper and lower arches
2. Class II div 2
3. Class I open bite
4. Class I closed bite
5. Class III
6. Having overjet of 10-12 mm with a deep bite
7. Horizontal growth pattern
8. Patient should preferably be in pubertal growth spurt
9. Have a positive VTO
10. Can also be used in TMJ therapy
11. Anterior and posterior arch length discrepancy
12.Lateral arch constriction
1. Factors that are unfavorable for correction by Twin Blocks include cases
with vertical growth and crowding that may require extractions.
2. Although the majority of Class II malocclusions are suitable for correction
by Twin Blocks, there are some exceptions.
3. Examination of the profile is the most important clinical guideline. If the
profile does not improve when the mandible is advanced, this is a clear
contraindication for functional mandibular advancement, and an alternative
approach should be considered.
4. Maxillary incisors should not be too vertical or lingually inclined (as in class
II div1).
5. Maxillary incisors must be torqued correctly.
6. No skeletal or facial asymmetry.
Upper and lower twin blocks
Ricketts Triangle:
The Facial Wedge The Ricketts triangle defines the face in profile as a wedge-
shaped triangle attached to the undersurface of the cranial base.
• The base of the triangle extends from basion to nasion and defines the cranial
base plane.
• The facial plane extends from nasion tangent to the chin at pogonion to define
the angulation of the face in the anterior plane.
• The mandibular plane is the third leg of the triangle defining the angulation of
the lower border of the mandible.
• The triangle is bisected by the facial axis, extending from pterygoid to gnathion
to define the direction of growth of the chin.
The facial wedge defined by the Ricketts triangle is superimposed on the facial
rectangle to provide a good visual representation of the face with the component
parts orientated in a common framework.
The Ricketts triangle
A facial rectangle is formed to frame the face. The formation of a facial rectangle
helps to define the relative position and angulation of cranial, maxillary,
mandibular and dentoalveolar structures. The rectangular framework makes it
easier to identify areas where growth departs from normal in the facial pattern.
Perhaps the most obvious feature of the analysis is the visual simplification of the
underlying pattern that results from placing the face in a rectangle. It is easier to
recognize the pattern of the jigsaw puzzle when the pieces are fitted together in a
recognizable framework. The same principle lends itself to three-dimensional (3D)
analysis.
Skeletal Planes
Dental Planes
Soft-Tissue Planes
Pre-treatment Post-functional
Angular Parameters Normal Value
Value Value
Mandibular-Plane 26⁰+/-4⁰
Angle (Go-Me to FH
Plane)
Cranio-mandibular
Angle (Ba-N to 53⁰+/-5⁰
mandibular plane)
27⁰+/-3⁰
Facial Axis Angle (Pt-
Ideal(29⁰-30⁰)
Gn to Ptv vertical)
Craniomaxillary Angle
(Ba-N to maxillary 27⁰+/-3⁰
plane)
Maxillary Deflection
(Maxillary plane to FH 0⁰+/-3⁰
plane)
Pre Post Functional
Dental Parameters Normal Value
TreatmenValue Value
Upper incisor to N
25⁰+/-7⁰
vertical
Lower incisor to N
25⁰+/-4⁰
vertical
Pre-treatment Post-functional
Linear Parameters Normal Value
Value Value
Nasal angle
(Angulation of nose to
N vertical)
-2mm at 8
Lower lip to E plane
(↓ 0.2mm/yr)
The primary indication for twin blocks in early mixed dentition is in Class II,
division 1 malocclusion in which prominent upper incisors rest outside the lower
lip and are not protected by the lips.
The deciduous molars and canines may not provide adequate undercuts for
fixation, but this problem is easily overcome.
In mixed dentition, the appliance design is modified by using C- shaped
clasps that may be directly bonded to deciduous teeth with composite to
temporarily fix the appliances in the mouth for 10 days to initiate full-time
appliance wear.
After a few days the clasps can be freed and the composite left in place to
improve undercuts for fixation.
In the initial stage the twin blocks may even be cemented or bonded directly
to the teeth in addition to the application of composite to secure the clasps.
The fixation enables the patient to adjust to wearing the appliance full time
during the critical first few days.
At this stage of development, the procedure of temporary fixation of twin
blocks to the teeth carries minimal risk, especially if first permanent molars
are fissure sealed.
Stages of Treatment
During the active phase of treatment, twin blocks are worn full time.
The objective is to correct arch relationships in the antero-posterior, vertical,
and transverse dimensions.
Normally, overjet and overbite are corrected within 6 months, and the lower
molars have erupted into occlusion within 9 months.
The average wear time for twin blocks is 6 to 9 months.
Appliance Fitting
The patient should now be wearing the appliances comfortably and eating
with them in position. The initial discomfort of a new appliance should
have resolved and the patient should be biting consistently in the
protrusive bite. Patient motivation is reinforced by offering
encouragement for their success on becoming accustomed to the
appliance so quickly, and reassurance on any difficulties. The patient
should now be turning the upper midline screw one quarter turn per
week. In the treatment of deep overbite the upper bite block should be
trimmed clear of the lower molars leaving a clearance of 1–2 mm to
allow these to erupt. At this stage, it is important to detect if the patient is
failing to posture forward consistently to occlude correctly on the
inclined planes.
This would indicate that the appliance has been activated beyond the level
of tolerance of the patient’s musculature. It would then be appropriate to
reduce the activation by trimming the inclined planes, to reduce the
forward mandibular displacement until the patient closes comfortably on
the appliances. The angulation of the inclined planes may be reduced to
45° if the patient is failing to posture consistently forward to occlude the
blocks correctly.
This may be an early sign that progress will be slower than normal, due to
weakness in the patient’s musculature reducing the functional response.
This response is more likely in the patient who has a vertical growth
pattern. Mandibular advancement will then be more gradual, usually
requiring incremental activation of the occlusal plane.
At the first monthly visit positive progress should already be evident with
respect to better facial balance.
Photographs demonstrate this very clearly, and may be repeated at this
stage to record progress. Progress can be confirmed also by noting the
amount of reduction in overjet, as measured intraorally with the mandible
fully retracted. To monitor progress, the overjet should be measured and
noted on the record card at each visit. This allows any lapse in progress
or cooperation to be detected readily.
Retention
Within a few days of fitting of twin block appliances, the position of muscle
balance is altered so greatly that the patient experiences pain when retracting
the mandible.
This has been described as the pterygoid response or the formation of a
tension zone distal to the condyle.
On removal of the appliance, the mandible is retracted and the condyle
compresses the connective tissue and blood vessels that have proliferated in
the tension zone behind the condyle.
Elastic bands
Maintain occlusal contact to intrude posterior teeth
Palatal Spinner
A palatal spinner may be added to the upper appliance to help control an anterior
tongue thrust. The spinner is an acrylic bead that is free to rotate round a trans-
palatal wire positioned in the palate. The objective is to encourage the tongue to
curl upwards and backwards instead of thrusting forwards.
Spinner on tubing
Tongue guard
It is in the form of a recurved wire extending from the premolar region towards the
midline and is recurved to its point of attachment.
Modified anterior inclined plane with palate-free area to control tongue thrust
The most crucial time to establish good cooperation with the patient is in the first
few days after fitting the Twin Blocks, when he or she is learning to adjust to the
new appliance. Twin Blocks have the unique advantage compared to other
functional appliances in that they can be fixed to the teeth. Such temporary fixation
guarantees full-time wear, 24 hours per day and excellent cooperation is
established at the start of treatment. There are two alternative methods of fixation
of Twin Blocks:
The appliances may be fixed to the teeth by spreading cement on the tooth-
bearing areas of the appliance but not on the gingival areas. The appliance is
then inserted and secured in place with cement adhering to the teeth. Zinc
phosphate or zinc oxide cement is suitable for temporary fixation.
Alternatively, a small quantity of glass ionomer cement may be used, taking
care to ensure that the appliance can be freed easily from the teeth.
Twin Blocks cemented in position
Twin Blocks may also be bonded directly to the teeth by applying composite
around the clasps. This is a useful approach in mixed dentition when ball
clasps may be bonded directly to deciduous molars to improve fixation.
Patient maintenance
After 10–14 days, when the patient has adapted to the Twin Block and is
wearing it comfortably, the appliance can be removed by freeing the clasps
with a sickle scaler. Sharp edges of composite can be smoothed over,
leaving some composite attached to the teeth. The altered contour of the
deciduous teeth will improve the retention of the appliance. If cooperation is
doubtful at any stage of treatment, the operator should not hesitate to fix the
appliance in for 10 days to regain control and restore full-time wear. After
10 days full-time wear the patient is more comfortable with the appliance in
the mouth than without it.
It is important that no acrylic is added to the distal incline of the lower Twin
Block, especially in the treatment of deep overbite. Extending occlusal
acrylic of the lower block distally would prevent eruption of the lower first
molar. It is necessary to leave the lower first molars free to erupt so that the
overbite is reduced by increasing the vertical dimension
If the patient’s rate of growth is slow or the direction of growth is vertical
rather than horizontal, to advance the mandible more gradually over a longer
period of time to allow compensatory mandibular growth to occur. This can
be taken into account by reactivating Twin Blocks progressively to extend
the inclined plane of the upper bite block mesially.
Several indications exist for the integration of twin blocks with fixed appliances. A
combined fixed and functional approach is necessary for correction of more
complex malocclusions in which skeletal and dental factors require a combination
of orthopedic and orthodontic techniques.
Depending on the timing of treatment and the features of the individual case,
alternative approaches may be considered to resolve multifactorial problems.
Patients with class II div 2 malocclusion usually have a mild class II skeletal
relationship with horizontal growth patterns and well formed chins.
Minimal mandibular advancement is required to correct the anteroposterior
relationship of Class 2 molar relationship through the placement of an
occlusal table between the teeth and the selective trimming of acrylic to
encourage Eruption of lower molars.
The original twin block appliances were modified from the standard design
by the addition of springs lingual to the upper incisors to advance retroclined
upper incisors.
This addition allowed the mandible to be translated down and forward to
correct the distal occlusion at the same time, the occlusal bite blocks were
trimmed to encourage eruption of the posterior teeth to reduce the overbite.
An edge-to-edge construction bite is registered to correct the distal occlusion
in Class II Division 2 malocclusion. Control of vertical dimension is
achieved by adjusting the thickness of the posterior occlusion inclined
planes.
The leading edge of the inclined plane must be maintained intact, because
this is the functional mechanism instrumental in correcting the malocclusion.
At the same time, relationship is corrected by the labial tipping of the upper
incisor crowns, which freeze the mandible from any possible distally locked
position.
SAGITTAL TWIN BLOCK APPLIANCE
Attracting magnets
The attracting magnets increase the frequency of occlusal contact on the inclined
planes. Indeed patients have observed that on waking, the blocks are in contact ,
probably as a result of attracting magnets. This contact may increase the
effectiveness of appliance at night. Care must be taken to limit the attractive force
magnitude. If the force is too strong, the appliances may be displaced or become a
monobloc, thus losing the advantage of twin block flexibility.
Repelling magnets
• Comfort—patients wear Twin Blocks 24 hours per day and can eat comfortably
with the appliances in place.
• Aesthetics—Twin Blocks can be designed with no visible anterior wires without
losing efficiency in correction of arch relationships.
• Function—the occlusal inclined plane is the most natural of all the functional
mechanisms. There is less interference with normal function because the mandible
can move freely in anterior and lateral excursion without being restricted by a
bulky one-piece appliance.
Facial appearance—from the moment Twin Blocks are fitted the appearance is
noticeably improved. The absence of lip, cheek or tongue pads, as used in some
other appliances, places no restriction on normal function, and does not distort the
patient’s facial appearance during treatment. Improvements in facial balance are
seen progressively in the first 3 months of treatment.
• Safety—Twin Blocks can be worn during sports activities with the exception of
swimming and violent contact sports, when they may be removed for safety.