0

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS
& DESIGN REPORT OF
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
Mrs. Sunita Joshi Bajracharya

Er. Bikesh Nanda Bajracharya 7488 ‘A’

July, 2021
BACKGROUND

A building project can be completed with help of multi-disciplinary professionals. It comprises

of planning, architectural design, structural design, electrical and mechanical and sanitary design
components.

The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the intended
purpose during its estimated life span, economical in terms of initial and maintenance cost,
durable and also maintaining a good aesthetic appearance. The construction of any building
consists of three phases: a) Design, b) Drawing with proper detailing and c) constructions as per
drawings and details. The design of structure consists of two parts. i) Analysis and ii) Design.
At first the preliminary size of various member for specific structure are fixed and the analysis is
carried out. With the result obtained from analysis, necessary design is carried out.

After the completion of the design, drawings are prepared with all necessary details. The
presentation of the design calculation and drawings should be clear. After completion of the
office works which includes design and drawings, the construction of the building is carried out.
The effort with which design has been carried out becomes worth wile only if the design is
translated to a correspondingly high quality structure.

Nepal lies in seismically active region. It is located in the boundary of the two colliding tectonic
plates – the Indian plates and the Tibetan plates. Records of earthquake are available in Nepal
since 1255 AD. Those records reveal that Nepal has hit by 18 major earthquakes, the 1833 and
1934 earthquakes were the most destructive ones.

However , it would not be economically feasible to design the building so as to ensure that they
remain elastic and damage free because the occurrence of maximum earthquakes is low say one
in 75 years. Thus it is reliable to design the ductile structure and not to design damage free
structure but non- collapsible structure for minimum destruction in lives and properties. The
design should ensure the structure against stability, strength and serviceability with acceptable
levels of seismic safety

Thus the seismic design of the building is done and the brief report has been prepared
BUILDING PARAMETERS

ARCHITECTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL REUIREMENTS

Type of building Residential Building

Number of storie 4 and ½ Storey

Storey height 2.489m

Height of parapet wall 0.9 m

Wall thickness

External wall / some internal walls 230 mm

Internal wall 110 mm

Plaster thickness 12 mm

CONSTRUCTION SITE
Location
Soil type Type II (Medium soil)
Bearing capacity : 130 KN/m2

DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS

Slab thickness 125 mm

Beam 230mm x 350mm

Column 300mm X300mm

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

Cement Ordinary Portland Cement

Grade of concrete M20 for footing and column

M20 for slab, beam

Steel Fe 500 for both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement

 ASSESSMENT OF UNIT LOADS OF MATERIALS

DENSITY OF MATERIALS

Reinforced concrete : 25 KN/m3

3
Brick work : 19.00 KN / m

Finishing load (Screeding) : 1.25 KN / m2

Finishing load (Parquet) : 0.20 KN / m2

Finishing load (Marble) : 0.67 KN / m2

Finishing load (Roof Tile) : 0.83 KN / m2

ASSESSMENT OF LIVE LOAD

Live load
Unit loads on floor
2
Rooms : 2 KN/m

Corridors : 3 KN/m2
2
Stairs : 3 KN/m

Roofs : 1.5 KN/m2

METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Analysis method adopted for EQ resistant design : Equivalent Static Method (ESM)
Level of design : Professionally engineered structure
Total number of design load cases considered : Ten
CALCULATION OF HORIZONTAL BASE SHEAR FORCE:
SEISMIC LOAD CALCULATION AS NBC105:

Calculation of Seismic Weight of Building

Seismic wt. at any floor level = Wi = (total Gravity loads due to beams, slabs, column and
walls
for 1/2 ht. above and 1/2 ht. below the level +25% of Live load )

MATERIAL AND SECTIONAL PROPERTIES

MATERIAL PROPERTY
Grade of concrete M20
Young’s Modulus of Elasticity: It is calculated according to the following formula
Ec = 5000 fck
2
= 5000 20 = 22360.679 N/mm
Grade of steel Fe 500

SECTIONAL PROPERTIES
Moment of Inertia: The beams in the building frames will act as rectangular in the end protions
near the support and will act as T or L beams in the central portion. There for the purpose of
analysis, a general practice is to assume the equivalent moment of Inertia for the whole length of
the beams. The Moment of inertia is calculated for the rectangular portion and multiplying it by
2.0 for T- beams and 1.5 for L- beams

Lateral stiffness: The lateral stiffness of the column is calculated using the following formula
3
D = 12EI / L

LOAD CASES AND COMBINATIONS

Load cases
▪ Dead load(DL)
▪ Live load(LL)
▪ Earthquake load in +ve X – direction (EQPX)
▪ Earthquake load in -ve X – direction (EQNX)
▪ Earthquake load in +ve Y – direction (EQPY)
▪ Earthquake load in -ve Y – direction (EQNY)

Load combination as per NBC 105:2020

 (DL+LL)
 1.5 (DL + LL )
 DL + 0.3LL ± (ELX±0.3ELY)
 DL + 0.3LL ± (0.3ELX±ELY)
Seismic Load Calculation 
Period Of Vibration(NBC 105:2020)

Using Emperical Equations
T1= kH^3/4
Where k,
 = 0.075 for Moment resisting concrete frame
 = 0.085 for Moment resisting structural steel frame
 = 0.075 for Eccentrically braced structural steel frame
 = 0.05 for Structural wall buildings
k= 0.075
H= 12.44
T1= 0.496794

Amplification of Approximate Period
The approximate fundamental time period calculated using emperical equation 
in section 5.1.2 shall be increase by a factor of 1.25.

T= 0.620993 sec

Elastic Site Spectra Calculation According to NBC 105:2020
The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading shall be calculated given by eq. 4.1(1).
C(T)=Ch(T)ZI
where,
Ch(T)= Spectral Shape factor as per 4.1.2
Z= Seismic Zoning factor as per 4.1.4
I=  Importance Factor as per 4.1.5

For Equivalent Static Method:
Now ,
Time Period, T= 0.620993 sec
AS, Ta<T<Tc
Soil Type= D
For Above Soil Type
Ta= 0
Tc= 2
Alpha, α= 2.25
K= 0.8
Spectral Shape Factor = Alpha
Ch(T)= 2.25

Seismic Zoning Factor
Z= 0.35 (For Kathmandu Valley)
As per Table 4.5

Importance Factor
I= 1
As per Table 4.6

Hence , Elastic Site Spectra is
C(T)= Ch(T) Z I
C(T)= 0.7875

Cs(T1) = 0.20 C(T) Cs(T1) = Elastic Site Spectra determined for Serviceability Limit State as per 
4.2
Cs(T1)= 0.1575

Target Spectra,
For Ultimate Limit State, the horizontal base shear coefficient(design coefficient), Cd(T1), shall be 
given by:
(Refer: Table 5‐2, NBC 105)
Rμ= 4

Ωυ= 1.5

Cd(T1)= 0.13125

Seismic Weight (W)= 1386.73 (From etabs)

Horizontal Base Shear:
V= Cd(T1) W
 = 182.0083 KN
For the Serviceability Limit State, the horizontal base shear coefficient(design coefficient), Cd(T1), 
shall be given by:

Ωs= 1.25

Cd(T1)= 0.126

(Refer: Table 5‐2, NBC 105)

Seismic Weight (W)= 1386.73 (From etabs)

Horizontal Base Shear:
V= Cd(T1) W
 = 174.728 KN
11. Analysis and Design

a. Analysis

A Three dimensional linear analysis has been carried out using the standard software ETABS 2016
V16.2.
The Structure is assumed to be fixed at the foundation level. The brick wall is considered as the
filler wall only. The beams are modeled as rectangular beams. The flange effect of the beams has
been neglected. Center to center dimension of the structure has been considered in the analysis. The
rigid end effect has also been considered in the analysis.

b. Design

The design of the members has been done as per philosophy of limit state method. For the design of
the members IS 456:2000 and design aid SP 16 has been used extensively. For the strap footing
design, SAFE 2016 has been used.

Longitudinal reinforcement in columns has been calculated based on critical load combination
among the five load combinations. A symmetric arrangement of the reinforcement has been adopted
from seismic point of view that reversal stress may occur. Longitudinal reinforcement in beams is
also based on critical load combination. It is calculated from the envelope of bending moment
diagram. Spacing of the shear reinforcement has been calculated as per the ductility principle. IS
13920 -1993 have been used for this purpose.
Calculation of the reinforcement for the typical members has been included in the Sample
Calculation Section of this rep.
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

A B C
2.87 (m) 3.2004 (m)

2
2.9209 (m)

1 X

Sunita Joshi.EDB Plan View - GF - Z = 0 (m)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

350 B-230
B-230X X 350

B-23
0X35 X350
0 B-230

C300X300
C300X

C300X300
0 B-23
X35 0X35
300

0
B-23 0

C300X300

C300X300
X35
0 B-2
30X 350
0 30X
B-23 350
B-2

00
C300X300

C300X3
B-2
30 350
X3 30X
50 B-2 B-2
350 3 0X3
30X
C300X

50

C300X300
B- 2

C300X300
300

B-2 0
50 30 35
30 X3 X3 0X
B-2 50 - 23

0
B
C300X300

C300X30
C300X300

B-2
0 30
35 X3
0X 50
B- 23 0
C300X300

23 B- 5
0X 3
0X
C300X

35 23
00

0 B-
C300X3

B- 0
35
0 23 35
300

0X
0
X 0X
30
C300X30
C300X300

35 3
B-2 0 BB--2
0 23
35 0X
C300X300

0X 35
-23 0
B
C300X300

B- 0
23 35
C300X

C300X300

0X B0X 0
35 350 35
0

23 -23
C300X30
C300X300

X0
0 B- 0X 3 0X
23 35 -2
30

B- B
0 B
0

B-
C300X300
C 300X

C300X300

23 50
0X X3
A 35 2 30
0 B-
300

C300X300
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

A
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View

TABLE:  Load Patterns
Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load

Dead Dead 1
Live<=3 Live 0
Live>3 Live 0
RoofLL Live 0
FF Dead 0
WALL Dead 0
PWALL Dead 0
EQX Seismic 0 User Coefficient
EQY Seismic 0 User Coefficient
STAIRCASE DEAD Dead 0
STAIRCASE LIVE Live 0

TABLE:  Mass Source
Name Load Pattern Multiplier

MsSrc1 Dead 1
MsSrc1 Live<=3 0.25
MsSrc1 Live>3 0.5
MsSrc1 FF 1
MsSrc1 WALL 1
MsSrc1 PWALL 1
MsSrc1 STAIRCASE DEAD 1
MsSrc1 STAIRCASE LIVE 0.25
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

3.933 3.933

3.933 3.933

3.933 3.933
9.323
7.458
3.933
9.323
7.458 4.25

9.323
7.458

9.323 9.323

4.25

9.323
4.25 9.323 7.458
7.458

9.323 9.323

4.25
9.323 7.458

4.25 9.323
7.458 C

9.323 9.323

4.25

4.25
9.323
7.458

A
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View Frame Span Loads (WALL)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1. 25
1.25

1.25

1.25

5
1 .2
1.25
5
1.2

5
1.2
5
1.2

5
5 1.2
1.2

25
A 1.
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View Uniform Loads Gravity (FF)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

2
2

2
2

2
A
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View Uniform Loads Gravity (Live<=3)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1.5
1.5

1 .5

1.5

0.75

A
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View Uniform Loads Gravity (RoofLL)

TABLE:  Centers of Mass and Rigidity
Story Diaphragm XCCM YCCM XCR YCR XCCM‐XCR YCCM‐YCR X Y ECCEN X ECCEN Y
m m m m
1F D1 2.8749 1.4346 3.0027 1.456 ‐0.1278 ‐0.0214 6.4008 3.225698 ‐1.99663 ‐0.66342
2F D2 2.8749 1.4346 3.0278 1.4508 ‐0.1529 ‐0.0162 6.4008 3.225698 ‐2.38876 ‐0.50222
3F D3 2.8749 1.4346 3.0367 1.4486 ‐0.1618 ‐0.014 6.4008 3.225698 ‐2.52781 ‐0.43401
4F D4 2.487 1.4176 3.0347 1.4474 ‐0.5477 ‐0.0298 6.4008 3.225698 ‐8.55674 ‐0.92383
RF D5 1.3656 1.4604 2.5528 1.4483 ‐1.1872 0.0121 6.4008 3.225698 ‐18.5477 0.375113
TABLE:  Modal Participating Mass Ratios
Case Mode Period UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.67 0.0004 0.7422 0 0.0004 0.7422
Modal 2 0.616 0.8401 0.0007 0 0.8405 0.7429
Modal 3 0.521 0.0006 0.0909 0 0.8411 0.8338
Modal 4 0.215 0.0001 0.0969 0 0.8412 0.9306
Modal 5 0.206 0.1012 0.0002 0 0.9424 0.9308
Modal 6 0.172 0.00002365 0.0135 0 0.9424 0.9443
Modal 7 0.125 0.0322 0.0022 0 0.9746 0.9465
Modal 8 0.125 0.0023 0.0299 0 0.9769 0.9764
Modal 9 0.109 0.00001149 0.0002 0 0.9769 0.9766
Modal 10 0.094 0.0006 0.0151 0 0.9775 0.9917
Modal 11 0.093 0.0165 0.0007 0 0.994 0.9924
Modal 12 0.083 0.0001 0.0022 0 0.9941 0.9946
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

A B C
2.87 (m) 3.2004 (m)

2 12 13 14
Fz = 256.7204 Fz = 363.1267 Fz = 201.5519
Mx = 3.0754 Mx = 3.362 Mx = 2.1138
My = 1.4993 My = 1.1911 My = -2.3738
2.9209 (m)

1 9 X 10 11
Fz = 262.0079 Fz = 364.6853 Fz = 198.3774
Mx = -2.8742 Mx = -3.2633 Mx = -1.8856
My = 2.2059 My = 0.6294 My = -2.2585

Sunita Joshi.EDB
Plan View - GF - Z = 0 (m) Restraint Reactions ((DL+LL)) [kN, kN-m]
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1 1 1

A B C
-5.1931

RF
8.3779
5.5982 -5.5496
-10.6192

-8.4731
-5.9464 5.9511 4F
9.4905

8.9786
7.6419 1.352 -8.7747

-13.3918
-11.0856

-10.26 -2.0048 11.5166 3F

9.3676

11.9337

6.7659 1.2274 -8.0284

-12.8244
-10.1376

-9.3498 -1.9024 10.655 2F

9.2485

11.7041

6.5014 1.2937 -7.7316

-14.6958
-11.6862

-9.3752 -2.1299 10.8278 1F

9.222

12.0946

4.7799 0.9176 -6.1575

-3.3088 -0.9441 3.3878 GF

X

Sunita Joshi.EDB Elevation View - 1 Moment 3-3 Diagram (1.5(DL+LL)) [kN-m]

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1 1 1

A B C

16.7504
RF
-18.3766

-5.3964 26.5258 5.3759

20.839
4F
-19.8112
-28.0351

-8.3681 -1.5691 9.485

32.3621
26.3522

3F
-28.8755

-31.2447

-7.5332 -1.463 8.7334

31.6844
27.1521

2F
-28.0423

-31.9252

-7.4214 -1.6003 8.6754

28.8033

30.2479

1F
-26.2

-33.3694

-3.781Z -0.8702 4.4619

GF
X

Sunita Joshi.EDB Elevation View - 1 Shear Force 2-2 Diagram (1.5(DL+LL)) [kN]
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.

Input Data

Name StoryResp2

Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories

Load Case EQX Top Story RF

Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story GF

Plot

Maximum Story Displacement

RF

4F

3F

2F

1F

GF
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0

Displacement, mm

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 1 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.

Input Data

Name StoryResp2

Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories

Load Case EQY Top Story RF

Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story GF

Plot

Maximum Story Displacement

RF

4F

3F

2F

1F

GF
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0 30.0

Displacement, mm

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 1 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.

Input Data

Name StoryResp2

Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories

Load Case EQX Top Story RF

Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story GF

Plot

Maximum Story Drifts

RF

4F

3F

2F

1F

GF
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 E-3

Drift, Unitless

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

m
RF 12.4465 Top 0.000769 0.000003
4F 9.9572 Top 0.001324 0.00001
3F 7.4679 Top 0.001956 0.000018
2F 4.9786 Top 0.002316 0.000023
1F 2.4893 Top 0.001761 0.000021
GF 0 Top 0 0

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 2 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Story Response - Maximum Story Drifts

Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case or load combination.

Input Data

Name StoryResp2

Display Type Max story drifts Story Range All Stories

Load Case EQY Top Story RF

Output Type Step Number 1 Bottom Story GF

Plot

Maximum Story Drifts

RF

4F

3F

2F

1F

GF
0.00 0.30 0.60 0.90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.10 2.40 2.70 3.00 E-3

Drift, Unitless

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Story Response Values

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir

m
RF 12.4465 Top 0.000048 0.001099
4F 9.9572 Top 0.000167 0.001925
3F 7.4679 Top 0.000177 0.002615
2F 4.9786 Top 0.000171 0.002933
1F 2.4893 Top 0.000112 0.002102
GF 0 Top 0 0

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 2 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

173 173
173 173
173 173 173
173 173
17373 173 33
1 173 11
77
173 173
173 173 173
173 173
173
173

720
720

720
173
179 173
173 173 173
173 173 173
173 1735
213733 17
173

720
173 173 173

720
173
173
212 173
215 173 173 173
173
173
2717
3 173
186

720
3 720
17 17
3 3 173 173 318
17 25 343
3 2 224 117733 212
173
17 184 316
3 172366 7 3 173
720

720
217
4

720
3147 34
2
254 8
21 17 3 6
173 186 6 3 1 7 18
32 0
319 173
19
0 8 27 1 73

720
205 42
865

21 5 24 6173
720

4 17
49 3 31 3
17 768 6
7 272 19 42
32 1 4 7 87 0 4
6 73 3 31 4
955

17 7 17 32
2
25 4 23 3
5 37 9 2
32 457 17
3
720

42
874

32 34
2 1
17
38
26
1 23218 17
3 44 17
3 27
2
923
2 5 9
0 35 4344 34 5 0 1 18
1390

2 73 5
4 1 3 97 31 73
0 17 3 0 2 7
2 22201 44
1345

3 1 6 3
36
2 2C0 34
62 2 8 7
9 2 3 36
759

45
7 17 46 3 2 43
1
3 37
4 97 24
33 1 1
1398

9
973

31 8 3 29
0 173 57 25 88 1713
1349

17
8 41 242
1497

3
2 45173 B 6 45 6 20
4 3 2 3 22 3
8 36
6 2 1
35 6 22
63 9
8 38
48 2
2 17 24
1588

1153

3
1535

A
32
3 17
1 58 5
9 22
47
7 42
2 4
35
1617
2

Y Z X
1

Sunita Joshi.EDB 3-D View Longitudinal Reinforcing (IS 456:2000)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1 1 1

A B C

173 173 173 RF

173 173 173
720

720
224 173 186 173 173 175 4F
173 173 173 173 173 173
720

720

720
322 173 277 270 173 342 3F
222 173 174 173 173 186
759

874

720

418 173 368 350 173 423 2F

322 211 242 227 189 271
1398
1153

923

429 173 389 366 173 431 1F

354 225 242 221 203 299
1617

1535

1349

GF
X

Sunita Joshi.EDB Elevation View - 1 Longitudinal Reinforcing (IS 456:2000)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

2 2 2

A B C

173 173 173 RF

173 173 173
720

720
215 173 173 173 173 179 4F
173 173 173 173 173 173
720

720

720
319 173 254 266 173 343 3F
215 173 186 174 173 184
720

865

720

420 173 349 347 173 425 2F

320 173 261 237 187 268
1390
973

955

432 173 374 362 173 432 1F

356 173 258 232 201 297
1588

1497

1345

GF
X

Sunita Joshi.EDB Elevation View - 2 Longitudinal Reinforcing (IS 456:2000)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

1 2

A A

173 173 173 RF

173 173 173

720

720
252 173 273 4F
173 173 173
720

720

437 173 497 3F

328 255 326
759

720

578 173 629 2F

452 310 457
1153

973

587 173 638 1F

472 321 482
1617

1588

GF
Y

Sunita Joshi.EDB Elevation View - A Longitudinal Reinforcing (IS 456:2000)

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 7/16/2020

A B C
2.87 (m) 3.2004 (m)

432 173 374 362 173 432

2 356 173 258 232 201 297
638

469
338
482

445
341
2.9209 (m)

173
321

173
246

173
201
Y
587
472

458
326

443
347

429 173 389 366 173 431

1 354
X 225 242 221 203 299

Sunita Joshi.EDB Plan View - 1F - Z = 2.4893 (m) Longitudinal Reinforcing (IS 456:2000)
 SLAB DESIGN

LOAD CALCULATION

Dead Load 3.125 KN/m^2

Floor Finish 1.45 KN/m^2
Partition wall 0 KN/m^2
Live load 2 KN/m^2

Total Load 6.575

Factored load 9.86 KN/m^2 Table : Calculation of Reinforcement of the Floor Slab

Fck 20 Mpa Reinforcement Diameter= 8 mm

fy 500 Mpa

Moment Coefficient Moments KNm Check for

Slab Longer Shorter Ratio for support for mid span Continuous Mid Span effective
Panel ly(mm) lx(mm) ly/lx bita x bita y alfa x alfa y Mbx Mby Max May d(mm)
S1 3200 2921 1.1 0.043 0.037 0.032 0.028 3.62 3.11 2.69 2.36 36.526

check for deflection

designed lx/d= 27.556
max area of steel required Ast= 96.05
max area of steel provided= 334.93
fs= 83.16

pt of max tension steel= 0.316

modication factor 2

max L/d ratio for the critical slab= 23

max ratio of Lx/d with modification= 46

deff= span/46= 3026.89/46 65.8

Dreq= 65.8+15+4= 85 <=125

Hence overall depth of 125mm is ok with slab
Depth Depth Ast max Percentage of Percentage Spacing Spacing Reinforcement bar provided
provided d, provided mm2 steel of steel required provided along x-x along y-y
mm D, mm required Pt mm mm
106 125 96.05 0.091 0.316 523.06 150 8mm Ø @ 150mm c/c 8mm Ø @ 150mm c/c
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
1F B6 6 B-230X350 UDCon10 2770.9 2920.9 1

Section Properties

b (mm) h (mm) b f (mm) d s (mm) d ct (mm) d cb (mm)

230 350 230 0 25 25

Material Properties

E c (MPa) f ck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) f y (MPa) f ys (MPa)

22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored

M u3 Tu V u2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-72.4308 1.1134 78.6585 0

Design Moments, M u3 & M t

Factored Factored Positive Negative

Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-72.4308 1.6516 0 -74.0825

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, M u3 & T u

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required

-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -74.0825 638 0 638 173
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 319 0 75 319

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, V u2 & T u

Shear V e Shear V c Shear V s Shear V p Rebar A sv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
102.9825 43.7189 67.0092 74.0782 571.35

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & V U2

Tu Vu Core b 1 Core d 1 Rebar A svt /s

kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
1.1134 78.6585 200 320 363.95

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 2 of 2 7/16/2020

SAMPLE BEAM DESIGN

BEAM ID: B1
GRID: 1-1/A-B
SECTION: 230X350

S.N. JOINT Position Required Provided

Ast(mm^2)

1 End Top 429 2 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

Bottom 354 2 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

2 Mid Bottom 225 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

3 End Top 389 2 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

Bottom 242 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

BEAM ID: B2
GRID: 1-1/B-C
SECTION: 230X350

S.N. JOINT Position Required Provided

Ast(mm^2)

1 End Top 366 2 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

Bottom 221 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

2 Mid Bottom 203 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

3 End Top 431 2 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

Bottom 299 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

BEAM ID: B6
GRID: A-A/1-2
SECTION: 230X350

S.N. JOINT Position Required Provided

Ast(mm^2)

1 End Top 587 3 -12Ø Th + (3-12Øex)

Bottom 472 3 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)

2 Mid Bottom 321 2 -12Ø Th+ (1-12Øex)

3 End Top 638 3 -12Ø Th + (3-12Øex)

Bottom 482 3 -12Ø Th + (2-12Øex)
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
1F C1 8 C300X300 UDCon9 0 2489.3 1

Section Properties

b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)

300 300 58 30

Material Properties

E c (MPa) f ck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) f y (MPa) f ys (MPa)

22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For P u , M u2 , M u3

Design P u Design M u2 Design M u3 Minimum M 2 Minimum M 3 Rebar Area Rebar %

kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
431.5909 -60.1387 -15.0583 8.6318 8.6318 1617 1.8

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment

Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.734928 2139.3 -6.0233 0 8.6318
Minor Bend(M2) 0.735987 2139.3 -25.9723 0 8.6318

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 1 of 2 7/16/2020

ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*1X5J669TXP5E5A7

Shear Design for V u2 , V u3

Shear V u Shear V c Shear V s Shear V p Rebar A sv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, V u2 30.812 69.9948 29.0396 30.812 332.53
Minor, V u3 40.4825 69.9948 29.0396 40.4825 332.53

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force V Top V u,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, V u2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, V u3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio

N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag A sc P uz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
900 16.2 1416.4357 284.5637 431.5909 0.870103

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma

Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M 3 ) Yes 0.859 300 5.241 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M 2 ) Yes 0.859 300 5.248 12 No 0

Notes:

N/A: Not Applicable

N/C: Not Calculated

N/N: Not Needed

Sunita Joshi.EDB Page 2 of 2 7/16/2020

COLUMN DESIGN

Concrete Grade M20

Steel Grade Fe500

S.N. GRID COLUMN SIZE Area of Reinforcement Reinforcement Lateral Ties

b D Ground First Second Third Top Ground First Second Third Top End Ties Mid Ties
mm mm mm^2 mm^2 mm^2 mm^2 mm^2
1 1A 300 300 1617.0 1153.0 759.0 720.0 720.0 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
2 1B 300 300 1535.0 1398.0 874.0 720.0 720.0 8-16Ø 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
3 1C 300 300 1349.0 923.0 720.0 720.0 0.0 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
4 2A 300 300 1588.0 973.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
5 2B 300 300 1497.0 1390.0 865.0 720.0 720.0 8-16Ø 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
6 2C 300 300 1345.0 955.0 720.0 720.0 0.0 8-16Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 4-16Ø + 4-12Ø 8mmØ @ 100 mm C/C 8mmØ @150 mm C/C
 DESIGN OF RAFT FOUNDATION

Name of Project : Design Example 18.5, Page 561, Reinf concrete A.K.Jain

Given Data:
1 Grade of Steel Fe 500

2 Grade of Concrete M 20
3 Size of Column (X x Y) 300 mm X 300 mm
2
4 Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil 130.00 KN/m

5 Diameter of Bars (Along X-direction) 12 mm

6 Diameter of Bars (Along Y-direction) 12 mm

1 2

Details of Columns
Considering column 1-A as origin (O) Moment about X-axis Mx clockwise +ve
Moment about Y-axis My Anticlock -ve

Column X-cord Y-cord Load Moment My Moment Mx

(in m) (in m) (KN) (KN-m) (KN-m)
A1 0 0 256.72 0 0
A2 2.921 0 262.007
0
B1 0 2.87 363.12 0 0
B2 2.921 2.87 364.68
C1 0 6.0704 201.55 0 0
C2 2.921 6.0704 198.37 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Cantilever length from centre line of columns
Left 0.15 m Top 0.15 m
Right 0.15 m Bottom 0.15 m
To Run the Program Press < Ctrl+w >
Total Vetical Column Load P= 1646.447 KN

Eccentricity along x-direction

Taking moment of column forces about the grid A-A

x = 1.464 m
ex = 1.464 - 1.4604492
= 0.003 m

Eccentricity along y-direction

Taking moment of column forces about the grid 1-1

y = 2.743 m
ey = 2.743 - 3.0352
= -0.292 m

3
Ix = 3.22 X 6.370
12
= 69.39 m4

3
Iy = 6.370 X 3.22
12
= 17.74 m4

A = 6.37 X 3.22
= 20.518 m2

Mxx = P.ey = -480.84 KNm

Myy = P.ex = 5.36 KNm

P/A = 80.24 KN/m2

Soil pressure at different points is as follows

P Myy Mxx
 = + .x + .y
A Iy Ix

Corner C-2
5.36 -480.84
C = 80.24 + 1.61045 + 3.1852
17.74 69.39
= 80.24 + 0.486 + -22.072
= 58.66 KN/m2
Corner 1-C
C = 80.24 - 0.486 + -22.072
= 57.68 KN/m2

Corner 1-A
 = 80.24 - 0.486 - -22.072
= 101.83 KN/m2
Corner 2-A
 = 80.24 - 0.486 + -22.072
= 57.68 KN/m2

Grid 1-B
-B = 80.24 + 0.486 - 0.000
= 79.76 KN/m2

Grid 2-B
-B = 80.24 - 0.486 + 0.000
= 80.73 KN/m2

Maximum Soil Pressure = 101.828 KN/m2 < 130.00 KN/m2

Hence OK
In the X-direction, the raft is divided in two strips :-

(i) Strip 1-1

Width = 0.15 m
Soil Pressure = 101.828 KN/m2
Span = 3.20 m
3 2
Maximum moment = 101.828 X
8
= 130.37 KNm/m

(ii) Strip2-2
Width = 1.6104492 m
Soil Pressure = 69.693 KN/m2
Span = 3.20 m
3 2
Maximum moment = 69.693 X
10
= 71.38 KNm/m

Cantilever Moment along X-direction

Soil Pressure = 101.828 KN/m2
Span = 0.15 m
0.2 2
Maximum moment = 101.828 X
2
= 1.15 KNm/m
At Y direction
(iii) Strip 1-1
Maximum Soil Pressure = 101.828 KN/m2 < 130.00 KN/m2
Span = 2.921 m
3 2
Maximum moment = 101.828 X
8
= 108.60 KNm/m
 Cantilever Moment along X-direction
Soil Pressure = 101.828 KN/m2
Span = 0.15 m
0.2 2
Maximum moment = 101.828 X
2
= 1.15 KNm/m
Therefore,
Maximum Factored Bending Moment = 195.56 KNm/m
2
Limiting Moment of Resistance = 0.133 ck bd

Therefore depth required d = 280 mm

Check for Punching Shear :

Let depth required = 500 mm

Shear Strength of Concrete = ks  c
Where ks = 0.5 + c

c = Short dimension of column = 1

Long dimension of column

Therefore ks = 1
c = 0.25 ck N/mm2
2
= 1.12 N/mm
Hence,
2
Shear Strength of Concrete = 1.12 N/mm

For Corner Column

Perimeter bo = 550 + 550 + 0 + 0
= 1100 mm

Vu 547020
Nominal Shear Stress v = =
b od 550000
= 0.99 N/mm2

For Side Column

Perimeter bo = 800 + 550 + 550 + 0
= 1900 mm

Vu 544680
Nominal Shear Stress v = =
b od 950000
= 0.57 N/mm2
2
v - c = -0.12 N/mm
Hence Effective depth is O.K.
Therefore effective depth required = 500 mm
Adopt effective depth = 500 mm
Overall depth = 540 mm
Development Length :

0.87 y
Development length Ld =
4 bd
where, bd = 1.6 x 1.2 = 1.92
Therefore,
Ld = 57 
For 12 mm bars (along X-direction)
Ld = 684 mm

For 12 mm bars (along Y-direction)

Ld = 684 mm

Reinforcement in long direction

M = 0.87 y Ast (d - yAst/ckb)

1.96E+08 = 435 Ast ( 500 - 0.025 Ast )

10.875 Ast2 - 217500 Ast + 1.96E+08 = 0
Ast = 944 mm2/m

Minimum reinforcement required = 0.12%

= 648 mm2/m
Therefore area of steel required = 944 mm2/m

Provide 12 mm  bars @ 120 mm C/C in long direction

(At top and bottom)

Reinforcement in short direction

M = 0.87 y Ast (d - yAst/ckb)

1.63E+08 = 435 Ast ( 500 - 0.025 Ast )

10.875 Ast2 - 217500 Ast + 1.63E+08 = 0
Ast = 779 mm2/m

Minimum reinforcement required = 0.12%

= 648 mm2/m
Therefore area of steel required = 779 mm2/m

Provide 12 mm  bars @ 150 mm C/C in short direction

(At top and bottom)
 DRAWING

3.22

12 mm  bars@ 150 mm c/c

(top & bottom)
6.37

12 mm  bars @ 120 mm c/c

(top & bottom)

12 mm  bars@ 150 mm c/c

0.540

12 mm  bars@ 120 mm c/c

Note : (1) All dimension in m where not specified

(2) Drawing not to scale

(Reinforcement Details)