A

REPORT

ON

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

OF

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING

FOR

.................................................

LIMIT STATE DESIGN

PREPARED BY: Er. SUBASH THAPA

January 2022
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 5

A. 1.1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................... 5

B. 1.2 DESIGN DATA ................................................................................................................................ 6

2.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 SOIL PROPERTY ............................................................................................................................... 7

2.2 STRUCTURAL PROPERTY.................................................................................................................. 7

2.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY ...................................................................................................................... 7

2.4 DESIGN PROCEDURE ....................................................................................................................... 8

3.0 LOADINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 11

A. Dead loads ........................................................................................................................................ 11

Table Dead Load Unit Weight ............................................................................................................... 11

Table Dead load applied ....................................................................................................................... 11

B. Live load............................................................................................................................................. 11

Table Live load applied ......................................................................................................................... 11

3.1 SEISMIC COEFFICIENT AS PER NBC 105:2020 ................................................................................. 12

3.2 EARTHQUAKE LOADS (EL) .............................................................................................................. 13

3.3 LOADS APPLIED IN ETABS .............................................................................................................. 23

4.0 LOAD COMBINATIONS ................................................................................................................ 27

5.0 MODELLING OF STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 28

5.1 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIEWS ......................................................................................................... 28

6.0 ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................... 28

6.1 CENTRE OF MASS AND RIGIDITY .................................................................................................... 29

6.2 STORY STIFFNESS .......................................................................................................................... 29

6.3 MODEL MASS PARTICIPATION ....................................................................................................... 31

6.4 INTER STORY DRIFT ....................................................................................................................... 33

6.5 STORY DISPLACMENT .................................................................................................................... 34

2
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

6.6 CHECK FOR STRONG COLUMN WEAK BEAM .................................................................................. 35

6.7 JOINT REACTION ........................................................................................................................... 36

7.0 DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ...................................................................................... 37

7.1 TWO WAY SLAB DESIGN ................................................................................................................ 37

7.2 COLUMN DESIGN .......................................................................................................................... 40

8.1 BEAM DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 42

8.2 FOOTING DESIGN .......................................................................................................................... 44

9.0 DESIGN SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 51

9.1 COLUMN SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 51

9.2 BEAM SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 52

9.3 FOOTING SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 53

10.0 ETABS RESULT ............................................................................................................................. 55

11.0 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................ 61

3
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: 3d model of structure ..................................................................................................................... 28

Figure 2 Joint Reaction ................................................................................................................................. 36
Figure 3 All Column Reinforcement ............................................................................................................. 55
Figure 4 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 1 ............................................................................................ 56
Figure 5 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 2 ............................................................................................ 56
Figure 6 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 3 ............................................................................................ 57
Figure 7 Beam reinforcement story 1 ............................................................................................................ 58
Figure 8 Beam reinforcement story 2 ............................................................................................................ 58
Figure 9 Beam reinforcement story 3 ............................................................................................................ 59
Figure 9 Beam reinforcement story 4 ............................................................................................................ 60

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Story stiffness .................................................................................................................................. 29

Table 2 Modal Periods and Frequencies ........................................................................................................ 31
Table 3 Modal Participating Mass Ratios Part-I ............................................................................................ 31
Table 4 Modal Participating Mass Ratios Part-II ........................................................................................... 31
Table 5 Modal Participation Factors ............................................................................................................. 32

4
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

1.0 INTRODUCTION
A. 1.1 BACKGROUND
Earthquake is one of the most dreaded natural disasters. Vibration of earth’s surface caused by waves
coming from a source of disturbances inside the earth are described as earthquakes It is a natural
phenomenon, which depends upon various factors. It becomes considerably destructive when it
affects an ever-larger concentration of material property and population.

The occurrence of earthquake is frequent in Nepal. This is because Nepal lies in the Himalayan range
where continental tectonic plates collide causing Indian plate to subduct with Eurasian plate. This
has caused built up of tremendous strain energy causing abrupt failure of rock masses along the
faults, which in their turn cause earthquakes.

Nepal has already witnessed large earthquakes causing heavy loss of life and property. The
earthquakes of 2015 and 1988 are the recent ones. It is believed that the medium earthquake occurs
in Nepal in every 50 years and major earthquake occurs in an interval of 100 years. It is highly
expected that another major earthquake is due in near future. Although it cannot be predicted when it
occurs but it is certain that when it occurs the severity of damage will be significant.

Like many urban areas in developing countries, Nepal’s risk is increased significantly basically in
regard to earthquake hazard. Uncontrolled development process, poor design and construction
practice has further increased the seismic vulnerability. If a large earthquake hits the area, it will
cause heavy loss of life and properties. So, it is highly recommended to design and construct the
structure s in cities like Lalitpur with due consideration to the seismic load to minimize the structural
damage and reduce the casualties when a large earthquake hits the area.

In view of this, the design and detailing of the mentioned building has been conducted with due
consideration of the earthquake load and its summary has been presented herewith.

5
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

B. 1.2 DESIGN DATA

Building Type : Residential/Commercial

Type of structure : Frame Structure

No. of Storey : 3 & half

Concrete Grade : M20

Reinforcement Used : Fe 500

Cement Used : Ordinary Portland Cement

Load Taken
Live Load
Room N/A kN/sqm
Corridor, Staircase, Balcony N/A kN/sqm

Design Philosophy - Limit State Design Confirming IS: 456-2000

Analysis Software Used = ETABS 2019.0.0

Earthquake Load Consideration = NBC: 105:2020

6
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

2.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS

2.1 SOIL PROPERTY
Soil Type * : Medium soil (Type D) (Assumed)
Bearing Capacity * : 120 KN/m2

2.2 STRUCTURAL PROPERTY

Foundation Type : ISOLATED AND STRAP FOOTING

Columns : Square – 14”x14”
Beams : Rectangular – 9”x14” and 9” x 12”
Slabs : 5” thick
Walls : Non-load bearing brick walls and RCC wall
Structural System : RCC Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Building Height : 8.6m above plinth level including stair cover

2.3 MATERIAL PROPERTY

This chapter provides property information for materials, frame sections, shell sections, and links.
Material Properties
This chapter provides property information for materials, frame sections, shell sections, and links.

Materials
Material Properties - Summary
Name Type E ν Unit Weight Design Strengths
MPa kN/m³
HYSD500 Rebar 200000 0 76.9729 Fy=500 MPa, Fu=545 MPa
M20 Concrete 22360.68 0.2 20 Fc=20MPa

Frame Sections
Frame Sections - Summary
Name Material Shape

B-9x14 M20 Concrete Rectangular

C -14x14 M20 Concrete Rectangular

B-9 x12 M20 Concrete Rectangular

7
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

Shell Sections
Shell Sections - Summary
Design Total
Name Element Type Material Deck Material Deck Depth
Type Thickness
mm mm
Slab-5 Slab Shell-Thin M20 127

2.4 DESIGN PROCEDURE

Preliminary design of structural elements

The tentative sizes of the Structural elements are determined through preliminary design so that
after analysis, the presumed dimensions may not deviate considerably, thus making the final
design both safe and economical. The tentative sizes have been determined as follows:

Slab:
From Deflection Criteria [Effective Depth = Effective Shorter Span / (26 * MF)]
Beam:
For Practical rule as 25mm Depth for 300mm of Span covering deflection Criteria

Column:
From evaluation of approximate gravity loading coming up to the critical Column.
To compensate for the possible eccentric Loading and earthquake loads the size is
increased by about 50 % in design.
Loads on structure
The following Loads were assumed to occur in Structural System.
a. Dead Load
b. Live Load
c. Seismic Load
Design Methods of Structural Elements
We have followed Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-2000
for design of Structural Elements. This incorporates the two methods of Structural Design of RC
structures specified as:
Working Stress Method based on the Working loads in conjunction with permissible stresses in the
materials.
Limit State Method based on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design
loads and design strengths of the materials. These design loads and design strengths are obtained by
applying partial safety factors for characteristic loads and strengths of the materials concrete and
steel.

We have followed the limit state method which is incorporated in IS: 456-2000. It is consistent with
the new philosophy of design termed limit state approach which was incorporated in the Russian
Code – 1954, the British code BS 8110 – 1985 and the American Code ACI 318 – 1989.
8
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

Limit State Method

The Limit State method of design covers the various forms of failure. There are several limit
states at which the structure ceases to function, the most important among them being,
The limit state of collapse or total failure of structure.
It corresponds to the maximum load carrying capacity. Violation of collapse implies failure. This
limit state corresponds to Flexure, Compression, Shear and Torsion.
The limit state of serviceability which includes excessive deflection and excessive local damage.
Excessive deflection adversely affects the finishes and excessive local damage results in cracking
of concrete, which impairs the efficiency, or appearance of the structure.

Design Equations in Limit State Method:

Singly Reinforced Sections:
The depth of Neutral Axis xu is obtained as
Xu = [ ( 0.87Ast fy / 0.36 fck b ) ]
For under Reinforced Sections, the neutral Axis depth Xu is limited to a value of X u max < 0.46 d
f o r steel of fy = 500 N /mm2
If the neutral axis depth is less than these limiting values, the ultimate moment is computed by the
equation
Mu = 0.87 fy Ast d [ 1 – { fy Ast / b d fck } ]
If the Neutral Depth is equal to the limiting values, then the section is balanced or limiting and the
moment capacity is evaluated by the equation.
Mu,lim = 0.36 X u, max / d [ 1 – 0.42 X u,max / d ] b d 2 fck
Mu,lim = 0.133 fck b d 2 ( for HYSD bars with fy = 500 N /mm2 ) Area of steel in a
balanced section is given by:
Ast = [ 0.36 f ck b X u,max / 0.87 f y ]
Doubly Reinforced Sections:
The ultimate moment resistance of sections with compression reinforcement (doubly
reinforced Section) is computed by the equation.
[ M u – M u,lim ] = f sc Asc ( d – d ’ )
Where, M u = Moment of Resistance of the doubly reinforced sections
M u,lim = Limiting moment of Resistance of a section without
Compression reinforcement
d = Effective Depth
d’ = Depth of Compression Reinforcement from compression
face
fsc = Design stress in compression reinforcement

The total Area of Tension Reinforcement is obtained as Ast = Ast1 + Ast2

Where,
Ast1 = Total Area of Tensile Reinforcement
Ast2 = Area of Tensile Reinforcement for a singly Reinforced Section for Mu,kimAsc= Asc
fsc / 0.87 fy

9
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 1/18/2021

c. The nominal shear stress Tv in beams of uniform depth is obtained as

Tv = Vu / b d
Where, Vu = Ultimate shear Force due to design loads

b = Breadth of member
d = effective depth

The permissible shear stress Tc in beam depends upon the percentage of longitudinal
reinforcement. Where Tc < Tv, minimum shear Reinforcement is given by

Asv / bSv > = 0.4 / fy

If Tv exceeds Tc, but is less than Tc max, then Shear Reinforcements are designed to take up the
balanced shear Vu – Tc bd
The Strength of Shear Reinforcement Vus is calculated as Vus = 0.87 fi Asv d / Sv

Analysis and Design of the Structural Elements:

The Structure is analyzed and designed by standard software ETABS 2016.0.2 It is one of the
World’s most popular and widely used structural Engineering Software. It is equipped with the
powerful analysis, design, graphics, and visualization capabilities.
Detailing of the Structural Elements:
The Reinforcement detailing of most of the important structural components have been shown
in drawing. They confirm with the relevant sections of the IS Codes IS 456-2000, IS 1893-1984,
SP-16, and SP –34 –1987.

10
 1/18/2022

3.0 LOADINGS

A. Dead loads

Dead loads are assumed to be produced by slab, beams, columns, parapet walls and
floorfinish. The weight of building materials is taken as per IS 875 (Part 1-1987).

Table Dead Load Unit Weight

Materials Unit weight
Reinforced Concrete (for foundation) 25.00 KN/m³
Reinforcement Steel 78.50 KN/m³
Brick Masonry 19.2 KN/m3

Table Dead load applied

9” wall 11.1 KN/m
9” wall with opening 7.8 KN/m
5” wall 0 KN/m
5” wall with opening 3.8 KN/m

Floor finish 1.2KN/m2

B. Live load

Live loads are applied on floor slabs on the basis of usage of rooms, as specified in
IS 875part II.

Table Live load applied

All room 2.0 KN/m2
Balcony/Lobby 3.0 KN/m2
Terrace live 1.5 KN/m2

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 11 of 62

 1/18/2022

3.1 SEISMIC COEFFICIENT AS PER NBC 105:2020

INPUT DATA
Location of Building
Structural System Moment Resisting Concrete Frame
Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting
Structural System (for Ductility and Overstrength Factors) Frame
Seismic Zooing Factor (Table 4-5 NBC 105:2020) Z= 0.35
Importance Fator (Table 4-6 NBC 105:2020) I= 1
Height of Building h= 11.48 m
Method of Analysis Equivalent Static Method
Soil Type D

PERIOD OF VIBRATION
Moment Resisting Concrete Frame kt = 0.075
3/4
Time Period T1 = 1.25*kt*h 0.355 Sec
Lower Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Ta = 0
Upper Period of the Flat Part of the Spectrum Tc = 2
Peak Spectral Acceleration Normalized by PGA ɑ= 2.25
Coeffiecient to control the decending branch of the
Spectrum K= 0.8

Calculation of Spectral Shape Factor: Ch (T)

Since Ta<=T1<=Tc Ch (T)= 2.25

Elastic Site Spectra for the Horizontal Loading (Clause

C(T) = Ch (T) Z I = 0.788
4.1.1 NBC 105:2020)

Elastic Site Spectra for SLS (Clause 4.2. NBC 105:2020) Cs (T) = 0.2 * C(T) = 0.158

HORIZONTAL BASE SHEAR COEFFICIENT FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC METHOD

Ref Table 5.2 NBC 105:2020

Ductility Factor for ULS Rµ = 4
Overstrength Factor for ULS Ωu = 1.5
Overstrength Factor for SLS Ωs = 1.25

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient for ULS

Cdu (T) = C(T)/( Rµ * Ωu) = 0.131

Horizontal Base Shear Coefficient for SLS

CdS (T) = CS(T)/ Ωs = 0.126

Exponent related to the Structural Period k= 1

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 12 of 62

 1/18/2022

3.2 EARTHQUAKE LOADS (EL)

Load patterns
Self-Weight
Name Is Auto Load Type Auto Load
Multiplier
Dead No Dead 1
EQX SLS No Seismic 0 User Coefficient
EQX ULS No Seismic 0 User Coefficient
EQY SLS No Seismic 0 User Coefficient
EQY ULS No Seismic 0 User Coefficient
FF No Super Dead 0
Live No Live 0
STAIR LOAD No Super Dead 0
WL No Super Dead 0

Auto Seismic Loading

Table 1.2 - Load Pattern Definitions - Auto Seismic - User Coefficient (Part 1 of 2)

X Dir X Dir Y Dir Y Dir

Is Auto Ecc Top Bottom
Name X Dir? Plus Minus Y Dir? Plus Minus C K
Load Ratio Story Story
Ecc? Ecc? Ecc? Ecc?
EQX SLS No Yes Yes Yes No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
EQX
Yes Yes No No No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(1/3)
EQX
Yes No Yes No No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(2/3)
EQX
Yes No No Yes No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(3/3)
EQX ULS No Yes Yes Yes No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
EQX
Yes Yes No No No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(1/3)
EQX
Yes No Yes No No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(2/3)
EQX
Yes No No Yes No No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(3/3)
EQY SLS No No No No Yes Yes Yes 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
EQY
Yes No No No Yes No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(1/3)
EQY
Yes No No No No Yes No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(2/3)
EQY
Yes No No No No No Yes 0.1 Story4 Base 0.126 1
SLS(3/3)
EQY ULS No No No No Yes Yes Yes 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
EQY
Yes No No No Yes No No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(1/3)
EQY
Yes No No No No Yes No 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(2/3)
EQY
Yes No No No No No Yes 0.1 Story4 Base 0.131 1
ULS(3/3)

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 13 of 62

 1/18/2022

Weight Base
Used Shear
kN kN

3468.1779 436.9904
3468.1779 436.9904
3468.1779 436.9904

3468.1779 454.3313
3468.1779 454.3313
3468.1779 454.3313

3468.1779 436.9904
3468.1779 436.9904
3468.1779 436.9904

3468.1779 454.3313
3468.1779 454.3313
3468.1779 454.3313

User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX ULS using the user
input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple

Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms

Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Base Shear Coefficient, C C = 0.131

Base Shear, V V = CW

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W V
Direction Used C
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313
X + Ecc. Y 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313
X - Ecc. Y 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313

Applied Story Forces

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 14 of 62

 1/18/2022

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story4 11.4808 61.5118 0
Story3 8.6106 150.2398 0
Story2 5.7404 161.8355 0
Story1 2.8702 80.7443 0
Base 0 0 0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 15 of 62

 12/26/2021

User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQY ULS using the user
input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple

Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms

Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Base Shear Coefficient, C C = 0.131

Base Shear, V V = CW

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W V
Direction Used C
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313
Y + Ecc. X 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313
Y - Ecc. X 0 0 3468.1779 454.3313

Applied Story Forces

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 16 of 62

 12/26/2021

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story4 11.4808 0 61.5118
Story3 8.6106 0 150.2398
Story2 5.7404 0 161.8355
Story1 2.8702 0 80.7443
Base 0 0 0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 17 of 62

 12/26/2021

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story3 8.9154 0 71.6503
Story2 5.9436 0 149.3566
Story1 2.9718 0 102.1853
Base 0 0 0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 18 of 62

 12/26/2021

User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX SLS using the user
input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple

Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms

Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Base Shear Coefficient, C C = 0.126

Base Shear, V V = CW

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W V
Direction Used C
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
X 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904
X + Ecc. Y 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904
X - Ecc. Y 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904

Applied Story Forces

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 19 of 62

 12/26/2021

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story4 11.4808 59.164 0
Story3 8.6106 144.5054 0
Story2 5.7404 155.6585 0
Story1 2.8702 77.6624 0
Base 0 0 0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 20 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQY SLS using the user
input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS.
Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Multiple

Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms

Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces

Base Shear Coefficient, C C = 0.126

Base Shear, V V = CW

Calculated Base Shear

Period
W V
Direction Used C
(kN) (kN)
(sec)
Y 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904
Y + Ecc. X 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904
Y - Ecc. X 0 0 3468.1779 436.9904

Applied Story Forces

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 21 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
Story4 11.4808 0 59.164
Story3 8.6106 0 144.5054
Story2 5.7404 0 155.6585
Story1 2.8702 0 77.6624
Base 0 0 0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 22 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

3.3 LOADS APPLIED IN ETABS

Wall Load

STORY-1 STORY-2

STORY-3 STORY-4

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 23 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Live Load

STORY-1 STORY-2

STORY-3 STORY-4

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 24 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Floor Finish

STORY-1 STORY-2

STORY-3 STORY-4

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 25 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Stair Load

STAIR DEAD STAIR LIVE

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 26 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

4.0 LOAD COMBINATIONS

Different load combinations are generated as per NBC 105:2020 since earthquake load is
considered from same code. The various load combinations are:

1) For Parallel system 1) For Non- Parallel system

1.2DL + 1.5LL 1.2DL + 1.5LL
DL+ λLL +Ex DL+ λLL +Ex + 0.3 Ey
DL+ λLL -Ex DL+ λLL +Ex-0.3Ey
DL+ λLL +Ey DL+ λLL -Ex -0.3Ey
DL +λLL -Ex DL +λLL -Ex + 0.3Ey
DL+ λLL +0.3Ex + Ey
DL+ λLL +0.3Ex-Ey
DL+ λLL -0.3Ex -Ey
DL +λLL -0.3Ex + Ey

Where,
λ = 0.6 for storage facilities
=0.3 for other usage
In the building, considering the grids placement the Load Combination acceptable is Non-
Parallel System as the lateral Load resisting elements are not in a regular grid.

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 27 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

5.0 MODELLING OF STRUCTURE

The structure is modelled in ETABS version 2019.0.0, different data for modelling are
shown in the following sections.
5.1 THREE DIMENSIONAL VIEWS

Figure 1: 3d model of structure

6.0 ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 28 of 62

 STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
6.1 CENTRE OF MASS AND RIGIDITY
Cum Cum
Diaphrag Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM XCCM YCCM XCR YCR
Story Mass X Mass Y
m kg kg m m m m m m
kg kg
Story4 D1 23945.49 23945.49 2.1971 5.0365 23945.49 23945.49 2.1971 5.0365 3.1647 5.3651
Story3 D1 77981.07 77981.07 4.3534 5.3995 101926.56 101926.56 3.8468 5.3142 4.566 5.7465
Story2 D1 125999.62 125999.62 4.5262 5.1848 227926.18 227926.18 4.2224 5.2427 4.5345 5.5555
Story1 D1 125729.54 125729.54 4.4578 4.8698 353655.72 353655.72 4.3061 5.1101 4.5639 5.3809

6.2 STORY STIFFNESS

Table 1 Story stiffness
Output Case Step Shear X Drift X Stiff X Shear Y Drift Y Stiff Y
Story Irregular Modifier
Case Type Type kN mm kN/m kN mm kN/m
Step By
Story4 EQX ULS LinStatic 61.5118 5.929 10375.29 0 0.215 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX ULS LinStatic 211.7515 7.171 29529.909 0 0.485 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX ULS LinStatic 373.587 9.97 37469.547 0 0.402 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX ULS LinStatic 454.3313 7.324 62031.338 0 0.201 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQX ULS LinStatic 61.5118 5.841 10530.425 0 0.36 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX ULS LinStatic 211.7515 7.051 30033.368 0 0.207 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX ULS LinStatic 373.587 9.708 38480.59 0 0.602 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX ULS LinStatic 454.3313 7.24 62755.889 0 0.497 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQX ULS LinStatic 61.5118 6.016 10224.659 0 0.791 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX ULS LinStatic 211.7515 7.291 29043.052 0 1.176 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX ULS LinStatic 373.587 10.232 36510.272 0 1.274 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX ULS LinStatic 454.3313 7.409 61323.328 0 0.871 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.253 0 61.5118 5.462 11262.446 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.662 0 211.7515 6.809 31098.498 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.5 0 373.587 9.41 39699.786 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.386 0 454.3313 7.031 64616.737 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.208 0 61.5118 5.213 11798.745 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.048 0 211.7515 6.746 31389.394 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.522 0 373.587 9.392 39777.741 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.461 0 454.3313 7.066 64298.533 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 0.715 0 61.5118 5.71 10772.781 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 1.374 0 211.7515 6.872 30812.944 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 1.492 0 373.587 9.429 39622.136 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY ULS LinStatic 0 1.233 0 454.3313 6.996 64938.105 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQX SLS LinStatic 59.164 5.702 10375.29 0 0.207 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX SLS LinStatic 203.6694 6.897 29529.909 0 0.466 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX SLS LinStatic 359.328 9.59 37469.547 0 0.387 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX SLS LinStatic 436.9904 7.045 62031.338 0 0.193 0 No 1
Step

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 29 of 62

 STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
Output Case Step Shear X Drift X Stiff X Shear Y Drift Y Stiff Y
Story Irregular Modifier
Case Type Type kN mm kN/m kN mm kN/m
Step By
Story4 EQX SLS LinStatic 59.164 5.618 10530.425 0 0.346 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX SLS LinStatic 203.6694 6.781 30033.368 0 0.199 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX SLS LinStatic 359.328 9.338 38480.59 0 0.579 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX SLS LinStatic 436.9904 6.963 62755.889 0 0.478 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQX SLS LinStatic 59.164 5.786 10224.659 0 0.76 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQX SLS LinStatic 203.6694 7.013 29043.052 0 1.131 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQX SLS LinStatic 359.328 9.842 36510.272 0 1.225 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQX SLS LinStatic 436.9904 7.126 61323.328 0 0.838 0 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.243 0 59.164 5.253 11262.446 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.637 0 203.6694 6.549 31098.498 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.481 0 359.328 9.051 39699.786 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.371 0 436.9904 6.763 64616.737 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.2 0 59.164 5.014 11798.745 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.046 0 203.6694 6.488 31389.394 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.502 0 359.328 9.033 39777.741 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.443 0 436.9904 6.796 64298.533 No 1
Step
Step By
Story4 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 0.687 0 59.164 5.492 10772.781 No 1
Step
Step By
Story3 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 1.322 0 203.6694 6.61 30812.944 No 1
Step
Step By
Story2 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 1.435 0 359.328 9.069 39622.136 No 1
Step
Step By
Story1 EQY SLS LinStatic 0 1.186 0 436.9904 6.729 64938.105 No 1
Step

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 30 of 62

 STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
6.3 MODEL MASS PARTICIPATION
Period Frequency CircFreq Eigenvalue
Case Mode
sec cyc/sec rad/sec rad2/sec2
Modal 1 0.714 1.4 8.7982 77.4083
Modal 2 0.696 1.437 9.032 81.5771
Modal 3 0.575 1.738 10.923 119.311
Modal 4 0.275 3.64 22.8723 523.1405
Modal 5 0.264 3.793 23.8331 568.0182
Modal 6 0.204 4.908 30.8361 950.8637
Modal 7 0.17 5.876 36.9221 1363.2416
Modal 8 0.168 5.959 37.4422 1401.9153
Modal 9 0.152 6.558 41.2039 1697.7602
Modal 10 0.118 8.475 53.2504 2835.6015
Modal 11 0.116 8.621 54.1656 2933.9078
Modal 12 0.105 9.555 60.0346 3604.1473

Table 2 Modal Periods and Frequencies

Table 3 Modal Participating Mass Ratios Part-I

Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ SumUX SumUY SumUZ RX RY RZ SumRX
sec
Modal 1 0.714 0.6548 0.1091 0 0.6548 0.1091 0 0.0372 0.1595 0.052 0.0372
Modal 2 0.696 0.1436 0.6576 0 0.7984 0.7668 0 0.1702 0.0351 0.0258 0.2074
Modal 3 0.575 0.0246 0.0628 0 0.823 0.8296 0 3.531E-06 0.0074 0.7593 0.2074
Modal 4 0.275 0.0741 0.0164 0 0.8971 0.8459 0 0.0939 0.4132 0.0138 0.3013
Modal 5 0.264 0.0195 0.0663 0 0.9166 0.9122 0 0.3979 0.1185 0.0101 0.6992
Modal 6 0.204 3.929E-05 0.0105 0 0.9166 0.9227 0 0.0644 0.0028 0.0593 0.7636
Modal 7 0.17 0.0293 0.0189 0 0.946 0.9416 0 0.064 0.0943 0.0037 0.8275
Modal 8 0.168 0.0274 0.0286 0 0.9733 0.9702 0 0.0947 0.0936 0.0013 0.9223
Modal 9 0.152 0.0016 0.0052 0 0.975 0.9754 0 0.0106 0.0085 0.0436 0.9329
Modal 10 0.118 0.0204 0.0011 0 0.9954 0.9765 0 0.004 0.056 0.0042 0.9368
Modal 11 0.116 0.0017 0.0231 0 0.9971 0.9996 0 0.0628 0.0045 0.0001 0.9996
Modal 12 0.105 0.0029 0.0004 0 1 1 0 0.0004 0.0067 0.0267 1

Table 4 Modal Participating Mass Ratios Part-II

SumRY SumRZ
0.1595 0.052
0.1946 0.0778
0.202 0.8371
0.6152 0.8509
0.7337 0.861
0.7365 0.9204
0.8309 0.9241
0.9244 0.9253
0.9329 0.969

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 31 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
SumRY SumRZ
0.9889 0.9732
0.9933 0.9733
1 1

Table 5 Modal Participation Factors

ModalMas
Period UX UY UZ RX RY RZ ModalStiff
Case Mode s
sec kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
kN-m-s2
Modal 1 0.714 -1.5E-05 6E-06 0 -0.009588 -0.019853 -0.019699 1E-06 8E-05
Modal 2 0.696 -7E-06 -1.5E-05 0 0.020508 -0.009311 0.013877 1E-06 8E-05
Modal 3 0.575 -3E-06 5E-06 0 -9.3E-05 -0.004262 0.075267 1E-06 0.00012
Modal 4 0.275 5E-06 -2E-06 0 -0.015229 -0.03195 0.010138 1E-06 0.00052
Modal 5 0.264 3E-06 5E-06 0 0.031352 -0.017112 -0.008689 1E-06 0.00057
Modal 6 0.204 -1.179E-07 2E-06 0 0.012609 0.002648 0.021038 1E-06 0.00095
Modal 7 0.17 3E-06 3E-06 0 0.012573 -0.015264 0.005255 1E-06 0.00136
Modal 8 0.168 -3E-06 3E-06 0 0.015296 0.015205 0.003081 1E-06 0.0014
Modal 9 0.152 -1E-06 -1E-06 0 -0.005116 0.004574 0.018045 1E-06 0.0017
Modal 10 0.118 -3E-06 1E-06 0 0.003135 0.011759 -0.005612 1E-06 0.00284
Modal 11 0.116 -1E-06 -3E-06 0 -0.012454 0.00332 -0.000983 1E-06 0.00293
Modal 12 0.105 -1E-06 3.87E-07 0 0.000978 0.00406 0.014107 1E-06 0.0036

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 32 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

6.4 INTER STORY DRIFT

Fig: Inter Story Drift by EQX ULS

Fig: Inter Story Drift by EQX SLS

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 33 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

6.5 STORY DISPLACMENT

Fig: Story Displacement by EQX ULS

Fig: Story Displacement by EQX SLS

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 34 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

6.6 CHECK FOR STRONG COLUMN WEAK BEAM

fy= 500 Mpa

fck= 20 Mpa

Beam
b= 230 mm
d= 355 mm
Ast(top)= 628 mm2
Ast(bot)= 515 mm2
Mu(hog)= 78.33 kN-m
Mu(sag)= 66.99 kN-m
∑Mb= 145.32 kN-m

Column
b= 305 mm
D= 305 mm
Clear Cover= 40 mm

Fatored
Axial Load= 280 kN
Area of rebar= 1608 mm2
pt= 1.276 %
Pu/fck*b*D= 0.111
Mu/fck*b*D2= 0.12 (from Table of fy=500 , d/D= 0.11 pt/fck= 0.06)
Mu= 107.3733 kNm
∑Mc= 214.7466 kNm

Result:
1.2∑Mb= 174.38369
∑Mc= 214.7466 kNm
∑Mc >1.2∑Mb

Conclusion:
Hence, Strong column weak beam check is satisfied.

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 35 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

6.7 JOINT REACTION

Figure 2 Joint Reaction

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 36 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

7.0 DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

7.1 TWO WAY SLAB DESIGN

Design Data

Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 N/mm2

Length of short span, Lx = 3.276 m fy = 500 N/mm2

Length of long span, Ly = 4.521 m
Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 15 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Thickness of slab is 127 mm ; Effective depth, d = 108 mm
Effective span, lx = 3.276 m (or) 3.154 m whichever is less; d = 3.154 m
ly = 4.521 m (or) 4.399 m whichever is less; d = 4.399 m
2
(ly / lx) = 1.39 < Here, (ly / lx) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
;

Load Calculations
Dead Load of slab = 0.127 x 25 = 3.18 KN/m2 Dust Load on slab = 0 KN/m2
Finishes load on slab = 1.20 KN/m2 Other load on slab = 0 KN/m2
Live Load on slab = 3.0 KN/m2 (Worst Load Case)
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.38 KN/m2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 3.0 KN/m2
Factored Design Load w = 11.07 KN/m2

Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)

One Short Edge Discontinuous For this support condition,

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 37 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Short span coefficient for (ly / lx) = 1.39, Long span coefficient,
For negative moment, ax = 0.0546 For negative moment, ay = 0.037
For positive moment, ax = 0.0408 For positive moment, ay = 0.028

Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w lx2 & My = ay w lx2

Ast,
Mu Mu / bd2 pt Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 152 mm2
req
KNm N/mm2 % mm2
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 4.49 0.38 0.1077 116
At supports, 6.01 0.52 0.1487 161 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c
For Long span, for short span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )
At mid span, 3.08 0.31 0.0875 95 Provide Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c
At supports, 4.07 0.41 0.1164 126 for long span (Ast pro. = 335 mm2 )

Check for Deflection

Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.31 %
fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 100.4

Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,

Modification factor = 2
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio = 52
Effective depth required = 61 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 38 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

SLAB SUMMARY

Thickness Rebar size

5" 8 mm dia on both axis

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 39 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
7.2 COLUMN DESIGN

8.0

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc
Story1 C3 3 C -14*14 402 DL+ λLL + EQY ULS 0

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 2 of 2)

Length (mm) LLRF
2971.8 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355 355 58 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
231.8753 62.8263 -8.7172 4.6375 4.6375 1455 1.57

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment

Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.655786 2616.2 4.3818 0 4.6375
Minor Bend(M2) 0.615309 2616.2 25.1305 0 4.6375

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s

kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 19.5438 63.1117 30.0901 19.5438 337.85
Minor, Vu3 36.8377 63.2847 30.0901 32.4996 337.85

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless

Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 40 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless

Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
929 14.6 1381.7626 300.8315 231.8753 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.88 304.8 5.629 12 No
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.88 304.8 5.281 12 No

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 2 of 2)

Ma
Moment (kN-m)
0
0

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 41 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

8.1 BEAM DESIGN

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc
Story1 B10 22 B-9x14 400 DL+ λLL + EQX ULS 4368.8

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 2 of 2)

Length (mm) LLRF
4521.2 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 41 41

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored

Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN

-36.4903 2.3016 38.3874 0

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative

Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m

-36.4903 3.4599 0 -39.9501

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, M u3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required

-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²

Top (+2 Axis) -39.9501 331 0 331 154

Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 165 0 0 165

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 42 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
44.8062 0 62.735 20.6055 552.59

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, T u & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s

kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
2.3016 38.3874 166.6 293.6 275.31

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 43 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

8.2 FOOTING DESIGN

SAMPLE OF ISOLATED FOOTING

Column size 355 355

fck 20 Mpa
steel grade fy 500 Mpa
Load 280 KN
Self weight 28 KN
Total Load 308 KN
Soil Bearing capacity 125 KN/m^2
Therefore, Area of footing 2.46 m2
Size of Footing L B

1.5697 1.5697
Provide Size 2.6 2.6 m

Adopted Size 2 2,600.00 mm

Now,
Soil reaction for factored load qu 62.1 KNm^2
0.06 N/mm^2

Depth of Footing
Vu= (qu*B)*((B-b/2)-d)
Assuming 0.2% steel for M20 concrete
Tc 0.32 N/mm^2

Minimum Depth required (d) = 182.54

Adopted Depth (d) 400

Check for bending

For
Mulim 0.138*fck*b*d^2 Fe415
N-mm
Therfore, Mulim 1,148,160,000.00

(qu*B)*((B-
Now, Mu = b)^2)/8)
101785824.9 N-mm

Depth provided
is sufficient

Check for two way shear

Perimeter of critical section 4(b+d)

3020 mm

Area of critical section 1208000 mm^2

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 44 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
Therefore, two way shear stress = 0.318 N/mm^2

Maximum shear permitted 0,25*sqrt(fck)

1.118 N/mm^2

Depth also
sufficient for
two way shear

Now calculation of reinforcement

Mu= (0.87*fy*Ast*d*(1-
(Ast/(bd))*(fy/fck))

Area of steel 593.44

41006.5583
Now final area of steel 593.44

Spacing of bars required 495.5045637

150 mm
Diameter (mm) 12

Adopted Total depth 450 mm

Length and breadth of Footing 2.6 m
Adopted Bars 12 @ 150 C/C

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 45 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

SAMPLE OF STRAP FOOTING DESIGN

BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL (qu)= 120

N/mm^
fck = 20 2
N/mm^
fy = 500 2
CLEAR COVER FOR THE FOOTING = 50 mm

A. SIZE OF FOOTING

SERVICE LOAD= 522 KN

AREA OF FOOTING REQUIRED= 4.785 m^2
ADOPTED WIDTH OF FOOTING(B)= 1.68 m
2.8482
COMBINED LENGTH OF FOOTING(L1+L2)= 1 m
2.0781
CG OF LOAD X= 6 m

FOOTING LENGTH L1= 1.512 m

1.3358
FOOTING LENGTH L2= 7 m

B.DESIGN OF STRAP BEAM

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 46 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
163.63
SOIL PRESSURE= 6 KN/M2

Table for BMD 0.00 0.0

0.15 -3.1
181.
1.16 7
4.67 -61.3
5.34 0.0
Table for S
.F .D
0 0.15 0.15 1.51 4.00 4.67 4.67 5.34
-
318.
0 41.2 8 55.8 55.8 239 -183.6 0

S4=239

S1=41.2 S3=55.8 S3'=55.8

0
0

S5=-183.6
S2=-318.8

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM

M2=181.7

M1=-3.1 0.0

M3=-61.3

MOMENT DIAGRAM

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 47 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

274.90
SOIL PRESSURE= 9 KN/M
FACTORED LOAD AT A= 360 KN
FACTORED LOAD AT B= 423 KN

41.2 41.236
SHEAR FORCE AT 1= 4 KN 4 KN
318.76
SHEAR FORCE AT 2= -319 KN 4 KN
55.7 55.756
SHEAR FORCE AT 3= 6 KN 5 KN
239. 239.37
SHEAR FORCE AT 4= 4 KN 8 KN
183.62
SHEAR FORCE AT 5= -184 KN 2 KN

C. POINT OF ZERO SF
318.763636
4 55.76
=
1.36
x 2 .-X

X = 1.16

3.09 3.0927
MOMENT AT 1= 3 KNM 3 KNM
181.71
MOMENT AT 2= -182 KNM 4 KNM
61.3 61.323
MOMENT AT 3= 2 KNM 8 KNM

181.71
MAXIMUM MOMENT 4 KNM

D SIZE OF STRAP BEAM

430.23
DEPTH OF BEAM REQUIRED FOR MAXIMUM MOMENT 3 mm
Assume
BEAM
DEPTH = 20 INCHES
0.50
= 8 m d= 468.13 mm
508.
= 1 mm OK

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 48 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
BEAM
WIDTH = 14 INCHES
0.35
= 6 m
355.
= 7 mm

E. Area of Steel Calculation

Area of Steel is given by formula, BM = 0.87* fy* At*{d-fy*At/(fck*b)}

AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED (Ast) DUE TO MOMENT M1= 15.22

ADOPT THE REBAR SIZE 16.00
NO. OF REBARS REQUIRED = 0.07575
NO. OF REBAR PROVIDED 3.00 OK

AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED (Ast) DUE TO MOMENT M2= 1061.53

ADOPT THE REBAR SIZE 20.00
NO. OF REBARS REQUIRED = 3.38068
NO. OF REBAR PROVIDED 4.00 OK

AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED (Ast) DUE TO MOMENT M3= 316.15

ADOPT THE REBAR SIZE 20.00
NO. OF REBARS REQUIRED = 1.00685
NO. OF REBAR PROVIDED 4.00 OK

1 MAIN NEGATIVE LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT @ TOP

AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED (Ast) = 1061.53
ADOPT THE REBAR SIZE 20
NO. OF REBARS REQUIRED = 3.38068
NO. OF REBAR PROVIDED 4
AREA OF STEEL PROVIDED (Ast) = 1256 OK
CHECK FOR PROVIDED STEEL OK
DEVELOPMENT LENGTH FOR THE ADOPTED BARS = 1200 mm

4 MAIN POSITIVE LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT @ BOTTOM

MAXIMUM NEGATIVE BENDING MOMENT= 61.32 knm
AREA OF STEEL REQUIRED (Ast) = 316.15 mm^2
ADOPT THE REBAR SIZE 16
NO. OF REBARS REQUIRED = 1.5732
NO. OF REBAR PROVIDED 4 OK
AREA OF STEEL PROVIDED (Ast) = 803.84 mm^2
DEVELOPMENT LENGTH FOR THE ADOPTED BARS = 960 mm
ETABS v19.0.0 Page 49 of 62
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

A.CHECK FOR SHEAR

SHEAR REQUIREMENT NEAR COLUMN B
PERCENTAGE OF TENSILE STEEL PROVIDED (p)= 0.48
SHEAR FORCE (Vu) = 239.378 Kn
NOMINAL SHEAR STRESS (τv) = 1.43762 Kn/m^2
SHEAR STRENGTH OF CONCRETE (τc) = 0.50
CHECK FOR ONE WAY SHEAR
τv>τc
τv<τc
τv>τc Shear Reinforcement required
Extra Shear force for shear reinforcement= 156.812 kn
Diameter of shear reinforcement 8 mm
Using 2 legged stirrups
SPACING 130.483 mm

OUTPUT
widt dept Rebar
h h dia Top Bottom
Strap beam(Joint A1,A2)
355.
7 by 508.1 16 4 4
Shear Reinforcement 8mm bars @4" c/c near support mid 6" c/c
14 " 20 "
Footing Slab
F1 1.68 by 1.51 F2 1.68 1.34
Footing Slab thickness 600 mm 12 Spacing 150

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 50 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

9.0 DESIGN SUMMARY

9.1 COLUMN SUMMARY

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 51 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

9.2 BEAM SUMMARY

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 52 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

9.3 FOOTING SUMMARY

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 53 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 54 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

10.0 ETABS RESULT

A. Column Results

Figure 3 All Column Reinforcement

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 55 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Figure 4 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 1

Figure 5 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 2

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 56 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Figure 6 Column Reinforcement at Elevation 3

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 57 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

B. Beam Results

Figure 7 Beam reinforcement story 1

Figure 8 Beam reinforcement story 2

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 58 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Figure 9 Beam reinforcement story 3

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 59 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

Figure 10 Beam reinforcement story 4

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 60 of 62

STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021

11.0 CONCLUSION
Residential building with simple configuration has been fully designed using a computer
program, ETABSv16.2.0 All the required design details of slab, beam, column and footing
and staircase have been presented.
Possible best-approaches have been adopted for most-economical design, yet fulfilling all the
requirements for important building. Due considerations have been given to the probable
increase in load and strength as a partial factor of safety.
Also, double tie-beams, on regular tie-beam at plinth level and one at top level of footing-pad
is specified as the building is being constructed in high seismicity area. During construction,
it is mandatory to follow IS13920, regarding provision of stirrups and ties, development
lengths, splices and other detailing. Band at sill and lintel are provided to increase lateral
strength of wall and to improve opening weakness on wall.
Strict Control over quality of materials and workmanship is required for expected
performance of building in future. Hence, following shall be considered during construction
works to obtain expected results.
A. General:
a. All works to be carried out in accordance with current best practice, Building
Regulations, the project specification and relevant Nepal Building Code(NBC), Indian
Standards and Codes of Practice. Materials and components to be appropriate for their
intended use.
b. The construction-works shall only be carried-out by trained mason with supervision of
Engineer.
c. During construction, the contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the structure
in a stable condition and ensuring no part shall be damaged under construction
activities.
d. Workmanship and materials are to be in accordance with the relevant current
Standards including all amendments and the local statutory authorities, except where
varied by the contract document.
e. All coarse aggregate used shall be crushed stone aggregate. The nominal size of coarse-
aggregate for RC bands and splints shall not exceed 12.5mm.
f. Clean sand, with minimum silt and free from clay and organic materials shall be used.
g. Ordinary Portland cement conforming to IS 269:1976 shall be used for all cement
works.
h. At least 48 hours’ notice shall be provided for all engineering inspections.

B. Structural:
1. Cast-In-Situ concrete/micro-concrete shall have minimum 28 days’ compressive cube
strength of 20N/mm² for all structural members unless otherwise stated.
2. The concrete compressive strength shall be measured on 150*150*150mm cube at 28
days, for various structural elements.
3. Reinforcing steel shall be TOR having minimum yield strength of 415N/mm².
However, TMT rebar with ultimate strain not less than 14.5% can also be used.
4. Cover to main reinforcing steel be in accordance with IS 456:1978 & as specified in
the structural drawings.
5. Clear Cover of Concrete shall not be less than that given below:
a. Concrete surface at soil = 50mm
b. Concrete on PCC, Bricks, STONE, etc = 25mm
ETABS v19.0.0 Page 61 of 62
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS REPORT 09/6/2021
6. Unless otherwise specified, all horizontal & vertical construction joints shall be
roughened.
7. A minimum of 48 hours’ notice shall be given to the Engineer before applying plaster,
concrete/micro concrete is poured, in order that the formwork and/or reinforcement
may be inspected.
8. All R.C.C work shall be continuously cured for 14-days.
9. All cement plaster works shall be continuously cured for 7 days.

THANK YOU

ETABS v19.0.0 Page 62 of 62