CHAPTER I New 12
CHAPTER I New 12
CHAPTER I New 12
INTRODUCTION
This study investigates the adjective clause errors in essay writing made by English
Department students in academic year 2017/2018. This introductory chapter covers the
background of the study, research problem, theoretical review, significance of study, scope of
the study and the definition of key terms.
Many studies have found that the errors made by the students who used adjective clause as a
result influenced their ability to use adjective clause correctly. One of them is a study done by Amelia
et al (2017) about the level of students’ ability in using the adjective clause in second year students of
English Department STKIP PGRI West Sumatera shows that the students’ in good level was 41,66%,
middle level was 41,66%, low level was 16,66%, and there were 37,5% students who failed to use the
adjective clause. This study indicates that the students in the university level also need more attention
in grammar, especially adjective clause before they write on an essay.
Then, Kpornu (2017) has studied about “Analysing Common Errors in The Use of English
Adjective Clause: A Case Study of St. Peter’s Catholic Basic School Ngleshie Amanfro” who stated
that the results of students’ errors were classified into two main categories: error types and causes of
errors. The common errors committed by the participants were misuse or wrong use of relative
pronouns, omission of relative pronouns, blend or use both relative pronouns and personal pronouns
and simple addition.
Saputra, et al (2019) also investigated the types and factors cause of errors in using adjective
clauses under title “English Department Students Error in The Use of Adjective Clause” that found
the types of error made by the first semester students of English Department Students of STKIP
Muhammadiyah Sampit in using adjective clauses classified into four categories. The highest error
made by the students was misordering with frequency 85 (80,95%). The second error made by the
students was omission with frequency 9 (8,57%). The third error made by the students was
misinformation with frequency 9 (8,57%). The fewest error made by the students was addition with
frequency 2 (1,90%). Based on the analysis of the data, the factors that cause error in using adjective
clauses classified into two factors. They are teacher and students’ factor. Teachers’ factor is caused by
the competence of the teacher. Students’ factor is cause by overgeneralization and translation.
Since adjective clause is one of the materials given to English Department students and many
researchers found that many of students were confused in studying of adjective clauses when they
made a sentence. The indicator that students have problem to implement adjective is most of them
were confused in putting the right introductory word of adjective clause. This is a job for teacher to
explain hardly about adjective clause because adjective clauses are necessary. It is important to know
what is the problem that causing it and how to solve this problem. Considering adjective clause is
used in writing skill, this research tries to investigate possible linguistic problems by analysing the
adjective clause errors of the students’ essay writing at English Department.
Relative Pronoun
Relative pronoun is a pronoun that joins a clause and its noticeable feature of an
adjective clause of its functions. Some relative pronouns that introduce the adjective clause
are who, whom, which, and that. The use of relative pronoun will depend on the noun or
pronoun which is modified in a sentence (Wijayanto: 2009).
1. Who
This pronoun is used to explain a person as the subject of a sentence. The pronoun who
replaces the use of he, she, and they in a sentence. Beside introducing person, the relative
pronoun can be used to explain an animal.
Example: Anna, who came to my house last night, will come to my birthday party.
In this sentence, the relative pronoun who refers ti Anna as a subject of the sentence.
2. Whom
Whom is also used to introduce person and the animals. But whom used to explain a person
as an object of the verb.
Example: Andy likes the girl whom he met at a singing contest.
The pronoun whom in this sentence explains about the girl that functions as the object of this
sentence.
3. Which
This pronoun introduces things in a sentence. It refers to the objects, animals, and ideas, but
this pronoun is not used to explain a person.
Example: The novel, which he borrowed yesterday, is about a true love story.
Which in this sentence explains about the novel.
4. That
Murphy (1985) and Azhar (1999) in Wijayanto (2009) and Prihandini (2011) state that the
use of relative pronouns “that” is the same with which and who. This pronoun refers to a
person, object, idea, or animal.
Example: The mountains that rise along the shores of Loch Ness shroud the lake of the fog.
That in this sentence refers to the mountains.
Walter (2000) states that there are five usage of adjective clauses. They are replacement
of subject, object of verbs, possessive, and objective of prepositions. The following
explanation discusses them.
1. Replacement of Subject
An adjective clause is called replacement of subject or object of the main clause is
the same as subject of dependent clause (second sentence). We use relative pronouns
“who” or “that” to indicate a person and “which” or “that” to indicate ideas and
things.
Example:
The boy is my son.
He is wearing a brown jacket.
The boy who is wearing a brown jacket is my son.
2. Replacement of object of Verb
An adjective clause is called replacement of a verb if a noun (subject or object) in the
main clause is the same as the object of the dependent clause, we use the relative
pronoun “which” or “that” to indicate things. We also can use “where” to indicate
place and “when” to indicate time.
Example:
a. Whom
The man was doctor Haryadi.
I met him in the hospital.
The man whom I met yesterday was doctor Haryadi.
b. Which
The bag was expensive.
I bought it last year.
The bag which I bought last year was expensive.
c. Where
The house is new.
Mr. Joko lives there.
The house where Mr. Joko lives is new.
3. Possessive
The relative pronoun (whose) can replace a possessive.
Example:
I was glad to meet Mr. John.
He shared about his experience.
I was glad to meet Mr. John, whose shared his experience.
4. Replacement of object of Preposition
An adjective clause is called objects of prepositions if a noun (subject or object) of
the first sentence (main clause) is the same as object of preposition of the second
sentence (dependent clause).
Example:
She is my cousin.
I tell you about her.
She is my cousin whom I tell you about (informal).
2) Addition
Addition errors are the opposite of omissions. They are characterized by the
presence of an item, which must not appear in a well-formed utterance. There are
three types of addition errors, namely: double marking, regularization, and simple
addition.
a) Double Marking
Many addition errors are more accurately described as the failure to delete
certain items which are required in some linguistics construction. For example:
He doesn’t knows my name. Which the correction of the sentence above is; He
doesn’t know my name.
b) Regularisation
Regularization errors that fall under the addition category are those in
which a marker that is typically added to a linguistic item is erroneously added to
exceptional items of the given class that do not take a marker. It means that
regularization error occurs when learners add morpheme to the exceptional
words, for example: Sheeps → Sheep, Putted → Put
c) Simple Addition
It is addition error that is double marking or regularization. No particular
features characterize all addition errors that are the use of an item should not
appear in well-form utterances. For example: The fishes doesn’t live in the
water. Here, the student makes a wrong sentence. He adds “does” for fishes. The
well-formed sentence is the fishes don’t live in the water.
3) Misformation
Misformation errors are characterized by the use of the wrong form of the
morphemes or structure. While in omission errors them is not supplied at all, in
misformation errors the students supplies something, although it is incorrect. There
three types of misformation namely:
a) Regularization errors
It is that all number the misformation category is those in which a regular
marker is used in place of an irregular one. as in runned for ran or gooses for
geese
b) Archi forms
The selection of one number of a class of forms to represent others in the
class is a common characteristic of all stages of second language acquisition. We
have called the form selected by the students an archi-form. For example, a
learner may select one member of the class of the class of personal pronoun to
function for several others in the class, me hungry, give me that!
c) Alternating forms
As the student’s vocabulary and grammar grow, the use of archi forms often
gives way to the apparently fairly free alternation of various members of a class
with each other. For example: Those dog. I seen her yesterday.
4) Misordering
Misordering errors are characterized by the incorrect placement of a
morpheme on utterance. This type of errors can be caused by the word-for word
translation of native language surface structure. For Example: I don’t know what is
that. Here, the learner misorders the word “is” and the well-formed sentence is I
don’t know what that is.
REFERENCE
Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching 4th Edition. London: Longman.
Richards and Schmidt. 2002. Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics.
London: Longman.
Esmalde, Vicente S. 2020. Surface Strategy Taxonomy in Error Analysis: Basis for
Grammatical Competence Enhancement Program (GCEP). International Journal of
Science and Research (IJSR). Volume 9 Issue 7, July 2020.
Istiqamah NA, Annisa. Prof. Dr. Samudji, M.A.and Riskia Setiarini S.S., M.Hum. 2012.
Dulay's Surface Strategy Taxonomy on the Selected Texts of the Bilingual Biology
Textbook: A Study of Error Analysis in Translation. English Department, Faculty of
Letters: Jember University.
Suhono. 2016. Surface Strategy Taxonomy On The Efl Students’ Composition: A Study Of
Error Analysis. Vol. 1, No. 2, November 2016: Lampung.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University
Press.