Rubric Case Study (Individual) - SBSD 2063 Technology Management

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

SBSD 2063 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

SEM 1 2021/2022

CASE STUDY RUBRIC (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT)

Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60

Completeness Complete in all respects; Complete in all respects; reflects Incomplete in many respects; Incomplete in most respects;
reflects all requirements all requirements reflects few requirements does not reflect reflections

Demonstrates a sophiscated Demonstrates Demonstrates an acceptable Demonstrates an inadequate


understanding of the topic(s) an accomplished understanding of understanding of the topic(s) understanding of the topic(s)
Understanding and issue(s) the topic(s) and issue(s) and issue(s) and issue(s)

Analysis, Presents an insightful and


Presents a thorough analysis of Presents a superficial analysis of
evaluation, and thorough analysis of all issues
most issues identified; includes some of the issues identified; Presents an incomplete
recommendations identified; includes all
most necessary financial omits necessary financial analysis of the issues identified
necessary financial
calculations calculations
calculations
Makes appropriate and Makes appropriate
Makes appropriate connections
powerful connections between but somewhat vague
between
the issues identified and the connections beteween the issues Makes little or no conenction
the issues identified and the
strategic concepts studied in and concepts studied in the between the issues identified
strategic concepts studied in the
the reading; demonstrates reading; demonstrates limited and the strategic concepts
reading; demonstrates good
complete command of the command of the strategic studied in the reading
command of the strategic concepts
strategic concepts and concepts and analytical tools
and analytical tools studied
analytical tools studied studied
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60

Supports diagnosis and Suports diagnosis and opinions


opinions with strong with reasons and evidence; Supports diagnosis and opinions Supports diagonsis
arguments and evidence; presents with limited reasons and and opinions with few reasons
presents a balanced and a fairly balanced view; evidence; presents a somewhat and little evience; argument is
critical view; interpretation is interpretation is both reasonable one- side argument one-side and not objective
both reasonable and objective and objective
Presents detailed, Presents realistic
Presents specific, realistics, and Presents realistic
realistic, and appropriate or appropriate
appropriated recommendations or appropriate recommendations
recommendations clearly recommendations with little, if
supported by the information supported by the information
supported by the information any, support from the
presented and concepts from the presented and concepts from the
presented and concepts from information presented and
reading reading
the reading concepts from the reading
Research Supplements case study with
relevant and extensive Supplements case study with Supplements case study with
research into the present relevant research into the present limited research into the present Supplements case
situation of the company, situation of the company; situation of the company; study, if at all, with incomplete
clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of provides limited documentation research and documentation
documents all sources of information of sources consulted
information
Writing
Writing demonstrates Writing is accomplished Writing lacks clarity
mechanics Writing is unfocused,
a sophicated clarity, in terms of clarity and conciseness or conciseness and contains
rambling, or contains serious
conciseness; includes and contains only a few errors; numerous errors; gives
errors; lacks details and
thorough details and relevant includes sufficient details and insufficient detail and relevant
relevant details and
data and information; relevant data and information; data and information; lacks
information; poorly organized
extremely well-organized well-organized organization
Criterion 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 or below 60

APA guidelines Uses APA guidelines


Reflects incomplete knowledge
accurately and consistently to Uses APA guidelines with minor Does not use APA guidelines
of APA guidelines
cite sources violations to cite sources

Source: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (2019)

You might also like