MST Week 3 Lesson 2 Mathematics Instruction For Efective Classroom
MST Week 3 Lesson 2 Mathematics Instruction For Efective Classroom
MST Week 3 Lesson 2 Mathematics Instruction For Efective Classroom
Lesson 2
Introduction:
Question, “What does the research say about teaching and learning mathematics? Here
are some statement about teaching and learning mathematics:
Structure teaching of mathematical concepts and skills around problems to be solved
(Checkly,1997; Wood & Sellars, 1996; Wood & Sellars, 1997)
Encourage students to work cooperatively with others (Johnson & Johnson, 1975;
Davidson, 1990)
Use group problem-solving to stimulate students to apply their mathematical thinking
skills (Artzt Armour-Thomas, 1992)
Students interaction in ways that both support and challenge one another’s strategic
thinking (Artzt, Armour-Thomas, & Curcio, 2008)
Activities structured in ways allowing students to explore, explain, extend, and evaluate
their progress (National Research Council, 1999).
There are three critical components to effective mathematics instruction (Shellard &
Moyer, 2002):
1. Teaching for conceptual understanding
2. Developing children’s procedural literacy
3. Promoting strategic competence through meaningful problem-solving
investigations
Students in the middle grades are experiencing important crossroads in their
mathematical education. They are “forming conclusions about their mathematical
abilities, interest, and motivation that will influence how they approach mathematics in
later years” (Protheroe, 2007, p.52).
Instruction at the middle grades should build on students’ emerging capabilities for
increasingly abstract reasoning, including:
Thinking hypothetically
Comprehending cause and effect
Reasoning in both concrete and abstract terms (Protheroe, 2007)
A. Classroom Observations
Classroom observations are most effective when following a clinical supervision
approach (Cogan, 1973;Holland, 1998). During a classroom observation cycle, the classroom
observer and the teacher meet for a preconference, during which the terms of the classroom
observation are established. A focusing question is selected, and the classroom observer
negotiates entry into the teacher’s classroom. Focusing questions provide a focus for classroom
observation and data collection, and could emerge from “big
idea” questions such as:
› What instructional strategy are you looking to expand?
› What are the expected outcomes of the classroom observation?
During the observation, data is collected by the classroom observer while the teacher
teaches the lesson. The observer collects data regarding only the focusing question that was
agreed upon during the preconference. The tool for data collection must match the purpose of
the observation.
After the observation, the classroom observer and teacher meet for a postconference.
During that time, the teacher looks at the data that is collected, and the observer asks the
teacher what he/she notices from the data. Based on the teacher’s responses, a conversation
Math, Science and Technology
Lesson 2
focusing on the questions addressed during the preconference. It is entirely possible (and,
indeed, likely) that the focusing question is not answered, but the post conference conversation
results in an additional list of questions that can guide continuing classroom observations and
post-observation discussions.
understandings that will be required of them as they study algebra in high school.
Teachers teach their students how to use manipulatives, and support the use of
manipulatives to solve meaningful problems that are aligned with the lesson’s
objectives.
D. Classroom observations: What kinds of questions to ask?
Teachers should ask questions that promote higher-level thinking. That does not mean
that a teacher should not be asking questions at the lower end of Bloom’s Taxonomy of
cognitive rigor. In fact, it is important that a teacher begins a lesson with questions at the Recall
and Understand levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. However, in order to solve meaningful problems,
students must be challenged with higher level questions that follow the lower-level questions.
Students will find difficulty applying their mathematical ideas or analyzing a mathematical
situation if they are not asked higher-level questions in classroom activities and discussions.
The National Center for Educational Achievement (NCEA, 2009) examined higher
performing schools in five states (California, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Texas) and
determined that in terms of instructional strategies, higher performing middle and high schools
use mathematical instructional strategies that include classroom activities which:
Have a high level of student engagement
Demand higher-order thinking
Follow an inquiry-based model of instruction – including a combination of cooperative
learning, direct instruction, labs or hands-on investigations, and manipulatives
Connect to students’ prior knowledge to make meaningful real-world applications
Integrate literacy activities into the courses – including content-based reading strategies
and academic vocabulary development
Additionally, NCEA researchers found that it was important for teachers to create
classrooms that foster an environment where students “feel safe trying to answer questions,
make presentations, and do experiments, even if they make a mistake” (p. 24).
Students find the mean, median and mode Students are conducting an experiment,
of a set of numbers. collecting the data and making predictions.
The students in Mr. Jones class are sitting Students are sharing ideas while working
in in
rows and are all quietly working on their pairs or small groups.
assignment.
Students have done their work on chart
At the end of class Ms. Stark collects paper and are holding the chart paper while
everyone’s worksheet and grades them. explaining to the class how they reached
their conclusions.
Students are in groups. One student in the
group works out the problem while the Students are acting out a problem in front
others of the class. Others in the class participate in
closely observe. a
discussion of the problem.
Mr. Johnson will only allow calculators in
his Students are using calculators to
classroom during the second half of the year. determine
Math, Science and Technology
Lesson 2
He believes that students need to learn all patterns when multiplying integers.
their facts before they use calculators.
Mr. Osborne tells his students that their
Ms. Brown is showing her students how text book is only one resource that he uses in
they can use a formula to easily find the his classroom. Tonight their homework is out
value of any term in a sequence. of that resource.
During the first week of school Ms. Students are using color tiles to build the
Fitzwater holds up the text book and says, “I terms in a sequence.
hope you are all ready to work very hard this
Some students are working in groups,
year. This is a very thick book and we will be
covering every single thing in it.” some in pairs and some individually. Not all
students
Mr. Swanson believes that all students are working on exactly the same thing.
should get the same instruction at the same
time. To accomplish this he only uses whole Students read about the history of the
group instruction. Pythagorean Theorem. After reading, they
solve problems using the theorem. Students
In Mr. McBride’s class he spends 99% of then write about what they did compared to
class time on skills and computation because the original uses of the Pythagorean
his students have difficulty understanding Theorem.
word problems.
Things to do:
Using a sheet of paper, read the Article, “The Effective Mathematics Classroom” and write a 300 words
of reflection about the article.
Rubrics: