MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: JOANNE A. FAMILARA Name of Rater: GREGORIO A. AMPARO

Position: HEAD TEACHER Position: PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review: FEBRUARY 06, 2023
Rating Period:

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge applications of Tool (COT) rating sheets or
n and content knowledge Inter-observer agreement
forms done through on-
Services Pedagogy within and across
site/ face-to-face/ in-person
curriculum teaching Efficiency
classroom observation
areas.

Timeliness
2. Evaluated with 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality 8
colleagues the coaching and mentoring
effectiveness of sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/ FGDs/ other
teaching strategies
collegial discussions that
that promote learner
highlights the objective
achievement in 2. Minutes/Notes of
literacy and coaching and mentoring
numeracy. sessions/meetings/FGDs/
other collegial discussions
that highlights the objective
3. Reflection notes of Efficiency
teachers on the coaching
and mentoring
Timeliness
sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/ FGDs/other
collegial discussions that
that highlights the objective
with proof/s of attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
 and Coaching Form
(PMCF), with annotations
highlighting the objective

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Developed and 7% 1. Classroom Quality
Educatio applied effective Observation Tool (COT)
n teaching strategies rating sheets or Inter-
Services to promote critical observer agreement
and creative forms done through on-
thinking, as well as site/ face-to-face/ in- Efficiency
other higher-order person classroom
thinking skills. observation

Timeliness
2. Learning 4. Worked with 7% 1. Classroom Quality
Environment colleagues to model Observation Tool (COT)
and and share effective rating sheets or Inter-
Diversity of techniques in the observer agreement
Learners management of forms done through on-
classroom structure site/ face-to-face/ in-
to engage learners, person classroom
individually or in observation
groups, in
meaningful Efficiency
exploration,
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.

Timeliness
5. Exhibited 7% 1. Classroom Quality
effective and Observation Tool (COT)
constructive rating sheets or Inter-
behavior observer agreement
 management skills forms done through on- Efficiency
by applying positive site/ face-to-face/ in-
and non-violent person classroom
discipline to ensure observation
learning-focused
environments. Timeliness
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
6. Worked with 7% 1. Classroom Quality
colleagues to Observation Tool (COT)
share rating sheets or Inter-
differentiated, observer agreement
developmentally forms done through on-
appropriate site/ face-to-face/ in-
opportunities to person classroom Efficiency
address learners’ observation
differences in
gender, needs,
strengths,
interests and
experiences.
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and 7% 1. Classroom Quality
Educatio and Planning applied effective Observation Tool (COT)
n strategies in the rating sheets or Inter-
Services planning and observer agreement
management of forms done through on-
developmentally site/ face-to-face/ in-
sequenced person classroom
teaching and observation Efficiency
learning process
to meet
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Reviewed with 7% 1. Approved LAC Plan Quality
 colleagues, 2. Minutes of LAC, FGD
teacher and session, or other
learner feedback collegial discussions,
to plan, facilitate, with proof of attendance
and enrich 3. Performance Efficiency
teaching practice. Monitoring and
Coaching Form Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
9. Advised and 7% 1. Proof/s of Quality
guided attendance in coaching
colleagues in the and mentoring
selection, sessions/meetings/LA
organization, C sessions/ FGDs/
development and other collegial
use of discussions that
appropriate highlights the objective
teaching and
learning 2. Minutes/Notes of
resources, coaching and
including ICT, to mentoring sessions/
address learning meetings/FGDs/ other
goals. collegial discussions
that highlights the
objective
Efficiency
3. Reflection notes of Timeliness
teachers on the
coaching and
mentoring sessions/
meetings/LAC
sessions/ FGDs/ other
collegial discussions
that highlights the
objective with proof/s
 of attendance

4. Performance
Monitoring and
Coaching Form
(PMCF), with
annotations
highlighting the
objective

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. 10. Worked 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
Education Assessment collaboratively coaching and mentoring
Services and with colleagues to sessions/meetings/LAC
Reporting review the design, sessions/ FGDs/ other
selection, collegial discussions that
organization and highlights the objective
2. Minutes/Notes of coaching
use of a range of
and mentoring
effective
sessions/meetings/FGDs/
diagnostic, other collegial discussions that
formative and highlights the objective
summative 3. Reflection notes of teachers
assessment on the coaching and Efficiency
strategies mentoring Timeliness
consistent with sessions/meetings/LAC
curriculum sessions/ FGDs/other collegial
requirements. discussions that that highlights
goals. the objective with proof/s of
attendance
4. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form (PMCF),
with annotations highlighting
the objective

11. Interpreted 7% 1. Approved LAC/FGD Plan Quality

 collaboratively 2. Any proof of communication
monitoring and with colleagues (e.g. text/chat)
evaluation 3. Results of collaborative
strategies of interpretation
attainment data to 4. Minutes of LAC, FGD
support learner session, or other meetings, Efficiency
progress and with proof of attendance Timeliness
achievement.
5. Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form (PMCF),
with annotations highlighting
interpretation of monitoring
and evaluation strategies of
attainment data

Weight Mid-year Review Rating

Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performance Review
KRA Ratin
Target Remarks Rating Remarks Results
g
12. Applied skills 7% Any one (1) of the following Quality
in the effective documents highlighting the
communication of objectives:
learner needs,
● Sample of the
progress and learners’ test results
achievement to signed by parents
key stakeholders, and corresponding
including evidence of
parents/guardians improvement
. ● Attendance sheets/
minutes of parent-
teacher conference
● Record of dialogue
and/or parent-
teacher
conferences and
corresponding
evidence of
improvement Efficiency
● Anecdotal record
communicated to Timeliness
and signed by the
learners and/or
 parents with
corresponding
evidence of
improvement
● Sample of
accomplished
rubrics given to
performance task
and corresponding
evidence of
improvement
● Sample agreement
of learners at risk
signed by parents
and corresponding

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
evidence of
improvement
● Signed report cards
of students at risk
with corresponding
evidence of
improvement
● Accomplished home
visitation forms
signed by the
learners and/or
parents
● Proof of
communication with
wider school-
community
stakeholders
● Others (please
specify)

Basic 5. Personal 13. Manifested 7% A reflection/ journal entry in Quality

Education Growth and learner-centered
Services Professional philosophy in the following documents
Development various aspects that highlights the
of practice and manifestation of learner-
support centered teaching
colleagues in
philosophy in any of the
enhancing their
own learner- following:
centered 1. Performance Monitoring
teaching and Coaching Form
philosophy. 2. Sample lesson plans of
colleague/s with
annotations about
enhancing their learner-
centered teaching
philosophy
Efficiency
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
3. Minutes of LAC session/s Timeliness
about enhancing teacher’s
learner-centered teaching
philosophy through lesson
planning
4. Approved LAC plan
5. Lesson exemplar used
during a Learning Action Cell
(LAC) session
14. Reflected 7% 1. Certification from the ICT Quality
on the Coordinator/ School Head/
Philippine Focal Person in charge of e-
Professional SAT
Standards for 2. IPCRF-DP
Teachers to 3. Performance Monitoring Efficiency
and Coaching Form (PMCF)
plan personal
4. Mid-year Review Form
professional
(MRF)
development 5. Updated IPCRF-DP from
goals and Phase II
assist Timeliness
 colleagues in
planning and
achieving their
own goals.

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any proof that the master Quality
Education various related teacher:
Services works/ ● Served as facilitator/
activities that speaker
contribute to ● Served as
the teaching- demonstration
teacher
learning Efficiency
● Served as a member
process.
of the technical
working group
● Served as OIC in the
absence of the
principal
Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
● Represented the Timeliness
principal in meetings
and conference
● Observed classes of
Teachers I-III
● Assisted the school
selection committee
in the evaluation of
credentials when
hiring or promoting
teachers
● Served in a
committee
● Served as adviser to
co-curricular
activities
● Served as
coordinator/
chairperson
● Authored/contributed
to a book or journal
 ● Coached and
mentored learners in
competitions
● Mentored pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted research
within the rating
period
● Others (please
specify)
with annotation on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority